Ottoman , Persian and Indian warhammers.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @adelmolla4216
    @adelmolla4216 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How long is the warhammer? You've listed 3 Eastern heavy armor. Could you maybe write them down for me? I would like to investigate myself these armors. Great video and thank you for sharing your knowledge!

    • @adelmolla4216
      @adelmolla4216 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The first one I couldn,t quute catch it but the second one is "Zirah Baktar" (Plated Mail) and the third is "Krug" armor (Mirror armor)

  • @tongwu2311
    @tongwu2311 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really like your content, it's hard to find anyone on TH-cam introducing Persian weapons.
    But man, you really need to upgrade your camera equipment, the 720P video quality looks like it was recorded 10 years ago.

    • @baytal-asad
      @baytal-asad  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you. I am working on figuring out what is happening with my phone and it's quality

  • @00zyx987abc123
    @00zyx987abc123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Having watched a couple of polo games in Pakistan, I picture the war hammer of the Indian subcontinent in the hands of light cavalrymen. Spun and swung from horseback, a hammer strike, with it without concussion, with or without cracking the steel, a hit to the helmet would knock a man down. A strike of the hook would rip off a helmet or pauldron; hooking a man's shoulder or armpit would drive him to the ground.
    A charge of light horsemen with was hammers would leave a breach of prostrate, disoriented, infantry ripe for tactical exploitation.

  • @delphinazizumbo8674
    @delphinazizumbo8674 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Murad IV used a 130lb mace

    • @surgeonsergio6839
      @surgeonsergio6839 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🤣

    • @isamartell
      @isamartell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Where did you hear this from?

    • @delphinazizumbo8674
      @delphinazizumbo8674 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      history book@@isamartell

    • @isamartell
      @isamartell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@delphinazizumbo8674 Do you have a reference for the book? 130 lb is a lot to be a mace.

    • @delphinazizumbo8674
      @delphinazizumbo8674 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      turkish museum has it online@@isamartell

  • @LongMax
    @LongMax 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have never understood the shape of the curved reverse tip on hammers; it seems to me that this is something more for the convenience of everyday carrying it in your hand as a cane, than for deep penetration using a blow at some special angle. A simple straight sharper one is much more dangerous, more practical, simply lighter in weight and easier to manufacture, no?

    • @isamartell
      @isamartell 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I believe the prying open armor works better with the curve.

  • @simonphoenix3789
    @simonphoenix3789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    putting a steel bar for a handle seems like it would be detrimental to the purpose and advantage of a hammer or an axe. The point is to put all the weight on one end. having a heavy steel handle ruins that to some degree even if it means the handle is sturdier.

    • @isamartell
      @isamartell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The weight is proportional and it’s not noticeable.
      The steel is a lot better as it won’t break if use use the haft to block.
      Many historical examples have steel hafts.

    • @LongMax
      @LongMax 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This does not have to be a steel rod, of course it can be a steel pipe, in which case the difference in weight from a wooden handle reinforced with steel splints is not so significant.

    • @PJDAltamirus0425
      @PJDAltamirus0425 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LongMax This. steel rods thin enough not to mess up wieght distributions , as shown in Tod's test of the longsword warhammer, were bendy is period. With the pipe and wood combination, you get the cut resistances from the pipe and low handle wieght.