China’s Military is Growing - Fast

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
  • With major advances in missile technology, naval forces and intelligence, China is well on its way to becoming what President Xi Jinping calls a “world-class” military power by 2049.
    #China2030 #Asia #BloombergQuicktake
    --------
    Like this video? Subscribe: th-cam.com/users/Bloomberg?sub_...
    Become a Quicktake Member for exclusive perks: th-cam.com/users/bloombergjoin
    Subscribe to Quicktake Explained: bit.ly/3iERrup
    QuickTake Originals is Bloomberg's official premium video channel. We bring you insights and analysis from business, science, and technology experts who are shaping our future. We’re home to Hello World, Giant Leap, Storylines, and the series powering CityLab, Bloomberg Businessweek, Bloomberg Green, and much more.
    Subscribe for business news, but not as you've known it: exclusive interviews, fascinating profiles, data-driven analysis, and the latest in tech innovation from around the world.
    Visit our partner channel QuickTake News for breaking global news and insight in an instant.

ความคิดเห็น • 8K

  • @doniel2008
    @doniel2008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4384

    Funny. A country with 800 military bases around the globe is looking at one with just one overseas base and says "you're growing too fast".

    • @user-nn5tr5ei2c
      @user-nn5tr5ei2c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +668

      And China spends a fraction of America's military spending. It's pure irony.

    • @jediwarlock1
      @jediwarlock1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      @@user-nn5tr5ei2c At the cost of more innocent Chinese civilian workers. The irony indeed...

    • @tailung9841
      @tailung9841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +741

      @@jediwarlock1 Chinese workers love the CPC and are happy with everything. We don't need your fake tears. Get out.

    • @mylet2658
      @mylet2658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@tailung9841 get on Chinese TH-cam spread your propaganda their, wait you can't you will get thrown in jail going on TH-cam how did you break through the wall 🧱

    • @blokin5039
      @blokin5039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@mylet2658 The Chinese should put you and your family in jail

  • @chetshu4175
    @chetshu4175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2325

    2:21 She is right. China's military expense has grown faster since 1999, the year when NATO bombed the China's embassy in Serbia, the Yugoslavia back then.

    • @user-rf3sv6hb7p
      @user-rf3sv6hb7p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +210

      and Hainan Island incident occured in 2001,

    • @HristovVojnikUOtadzbini
      @HristovVojnikUOtadzbini 2 ปีที่แล้ว +471

      Hello to China from Serbia 🤗🇷🇸🇨🇳

    • @lvjinbin28
      @lvjinbin28 2 ปีที่แล้ว +623

      USA: why China felt threatened after We bombed their embassy?

    • @chetshu4175
      @chetshu4175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      @@lvjinbin28 Not felt threatened, but felt too weak to threaten the US

    • @octaneho3576
      @octaneho3576 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      @@lvjinbin28 we felt anger

  • @Jay_Bless
    @Jay_Bless 2 ปีที่แล้ว +987

    I have respect for countries that have grown strong despite western sanctions and blackmail.

    • @yyongfan
      @yyongfan ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Thank you for very much.

    • @danthe360man
      @danthe360man ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Clown

    • @destiny2020
      @destiny2020 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      absolute right

    • @wisenG771
      @wisenG771 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danthe360man you’re the only clown here obviously

    • @arabian_desert
      @arabian_desert 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Wise, man.

  • @F22ERaptor
    @F22ERaptor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    Whether you like China or not or whether you disagree or agree with their tactics, one cannot deny that they have grown to be a modern nation. They still have a ways to go, but lifting millions out of poverty is perhaps the best achievement any country can accomplish.

    • @user-en8wo3hn9o
      @user-en8wo3hn9o 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      more like redefining the poverty line lol

    • @adamelghalmi9771
      @adamelghalmi9771 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@user-en8wo3hn9o not really. with a gdp per capita of about 10,300 and growing, the poverty line has probably risen in china compared to other countries. it's not really this evil megamind that the US portrays it as. visit sometime, i'm from iraq originally and migrating to china is the reason i now live in switzerland retired at 34. plenty of oppurtunity, you americans never take it though

    • @user-en8wo3hn9o
      @user-en8wo3hn9o 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      keep swallowing those ccp lies buddy @@adamelghalmi9771 😂

    • @liongjiahwong5478
      @liongjiahwong5478 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@adamelghalmi9771not 10,300. Check again.

    • @adamelghalmi9771
      @adamelghalmi9771 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@liongjiahwong5478 u been listening to BBC saying china's poor haven't you?

  • @howaterbrd9563
    @howaterbrd9563 2 ปีที่แล้ว +684

    Chinese military budget is still 25%of the US', China hasn't fought in a war this century. China is not the problem, Western aggression is.

    • @greek2068
      @greek2068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      True

    • @stevencrook3979
      @stevencrook3979 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does anyone believe the military budget published by the Chinese regime?

    • @rutherfordn7560
      @rutherfordn7560 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Ah yes, they haven’t fought a war, but it’s ok to illegally annex other nations
      *Cough cough* Tibet *cough cough*

    • @lelum2007
      @lelum2007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      exactly mate - western world is so inhumane and greedy for money and power and when another country doing it - it`s wrong lol

    • @Alephkilo
      @Alephkilo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Duhh they were involved in the Korean War and they also fought a war with India..

  • @johndonald2904
    @johndonald2904 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1254

    You forgot to give the reason why. Because they are surrounded by hundreds of military bases.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ... who wants them there, because the alternative is even worse. Ask the Philippines how they fared with their territorial integrity after asking the Americans to leave.

    • @touchme211
      @touchme211 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Bases dont appear without the residing country accepting it.

    • @iamtanec
      @iamtanec 2 ปีที่แล้ว +325

      @@touchme211 If so then don't complain about your neighbor increasing their defense capabality.

    • @harishthotakura857
      @harishthotakura857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@iamtanec lol

    • @tailung9841
      @tailung9841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@touchme211 Wrong, Japan and South Korea and tonnes of other countries around the world never asked for or wanted U.S. military bases. The USA forced these countries to bow down to them, to build military bases against their will. If they disobey the USA, they will be sanctioned and threatened.

  • @dumbfrog123
    @dumbfrog123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +451

    25 years ago China's share of the world GDP was about 3%; now, it is about18.5%.
    In the past 2000 years, China's share of the world GDP was around 25%. The US surpassed China in GDP in the year 1890. It seems like China will reclaim it back within 10 years.
    China was almost colonized by the West and Japan. Learned from the past 150 years, China needs a strong military to protect its wealth.

    • @transfig8724
      @transfig8724 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The reform and open really developed China's economy.

    • @alithelin1234
      @alithelin1234 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Gdp is a bourgeoiuse concept, not a measurement of real economy. China is already global economic power in real economic measurement and manufacturing

    • @pixelmasque
      @pixelmasque ปีที่แล้ว

      some figures show China is already 20% larger in GDP than america (both who reports and cia).

    • @frank-js9nf
      @frank-js9nf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      China was invaded by some western countries and Japan in short time ,but china was never colonized, during the invade period ,the central government still dominate and governed the whole country of china

    • @michaelg4158
      @michaelg4158 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      You're right to use "almost colonized". In fact CN was too big to be swallowed, you need a very big stomach to swallow it all. Only parts of it were colonized but not the whole country unlike IN which was wholly colonized by British papaji and renamed it to British India.

  • @SoulAndDust
    @SoulAndDust ปีที่แล้ว +66

    USA: "A day without hypocrisy, is a day wasted".

    • @Dark-yv1es
      @Dark-yv1es 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Double standard too

  • @boyifyoudont1836
    @boyifyoudont1836 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3097

    US with over 800 bases world wide: “this is fine”
    US seeing a single eastern country trying to open a base: “you’re out of control, you’re prepping for war”

    • @sta11ed15
      @sta11ed15 2 ปีที่แล้ว +230

      True

    • @junebug8485
      @junebug8485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +334

      america doesnt want competitors thats why

    • @voto75
      @voto75 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      @@junebug8485 We stop it before it grows

    • @redlizerad8268
      @redlizerad8268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@voto75 smart idea lol

    • @kinewe1161
      @kinewe1161 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@voto75 Avoid becoming a monster like America, right?

  • @kinhuang8460
    @kinhuang8460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1704

    If you are familiar with China history of the past 200 years , you definitly understand why China has been developing its military power.

    • @andyinfante5547
      @andyinfante5547 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s because of Mao Zedong and his Great Leap Forward. Xi just rehash all the pride in a military China policy

    • @user-tn2ou3ph1z
      @user-tn2ou3ph1z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +154

      We Chinese have a saying that
      backward will be beaten so we
      are also developing military
      strength under the premise of
      economic development is to
      resist the United States

    • @user-rp9ps1eq9k
      @user-rp9ps1eq9k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      All of european peaple know what was the colonization
      But you cant wake up some who pretend hes sleep!

    • @user-tn2ou3ph1z
      @user-tn2ou3ph1z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      @SUPER POWER PAKISTAN 那是你们自己的想法 不是我们的想法 貌似印度才有侵略别国的想法吧

    • @Interstellar987
      @Interstellar987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup! Alot of Americans don't even know 10% of the history in Asia or the Middle East. They listen to Western media and think they know about the past 500 years.

  • @MrMangoman48
    @MrMangoman48 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Do not stop please China 🇨🇳

  • @xwendy6463
    @xwendy6463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    I am so glad that most of the people understand the real situation in this world

    • @MrGanbat84
      @MrGanbat84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Yes we understand very well, US is so aggressive and hegemony

    • @snsproduc
      @snsproduc ปีที่แล้ว

      how do you feel now?

    • @xwendy6463
      @xwendy6463 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@snsproduc Let me tell you how I feel now. China is using its power to protect itself and its sovereignty while the US is using its power to control the world and hurt developing countries just for its own interests.

    • @icutthings649
      @icutthings649 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrGanbat84 well china have concentration camps PS I'm not even american

    • @ntal5859
      @ntal5859 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed, the USA loves making wars and telling everyone who should lead their own country.

  • @smashsmash5866
    @smashsmash5866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1844

    I don't see anything wrong having a strong military when you have a strong growing fast economy. They need to protected.

    • @shyrusangoluan5509
      @shyrusangoluan5509 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      until they use it to invade...

    • @user-to2su6ro1e
      @user-to2su6ro1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +508

      @@shyrusangoluan5509 Did China invade other countries? please let me know. It seems that one superpower is more interested in invading other countries but I can't remember it's name.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@user-to2su6ro1e India and Maritime SE Asia want you out of their lands. Tibet and East Turkestan too depending on who counted their existence. Russia is keeping an eye on you as you look to become an Arctic power via Siberia. And the Vietnamese hates you with their _thousand_ years of humiliation across multiple dynasties.

    • @JiTiAr35
      @JiTiAr35 2 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      @@user-to2su6ro1e Tibet

    • @Mykeepersbrother
      @Mykeepersbrother 2 ปีที่แล้ว +455

      @@JiTiAr35 plz give back TEXAS CALIFORNIA to Mexico. Plz give back Hawaii to its original dynasty.

  • @MrGod47
    @MrGod47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    This is one of stupidest conclusion I've ever seen, "Taiwan might be China's Vietnam"?? What on earth are you talking about? This proves so-called 'Dr. Zeno' has very poor understanding of Chinese history and East Asian history. More like "Vietnam was China's Vietnam", China literally fought with Vietnam several times in history already, sometimes won, sometimes lost, and Vietnam literally was part of China and China's vassal in history, China also helped Vietnam fighting against French and Americans to achieve their independence in Vietnam War at 20th century.
    Vietnam is far bigger than Taiwan and has far stronger fighting will, and it's actually a global recognized independent country and UN member unlike Taiwan, while Taiwan is just an island of China which currently is still controlled by "Republic of China" due to Chinese Civil War, hence the so-called "de facto independence" of Taiwan. The whole historical and political contexts are totally different.
    Moreover, the situation of China reclaiming the sovereignty of Taiwan island has already happened several times before, from Ming to Qing to ROC all had similar situation, this is not really new thing.

    • @user-xo3hq1jm8c
      @user-xo3hq1jm8c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In essence, there is no difference between Taiwan and any other province. the transformation of dynasties does not bring each province together sequentially (only from south to north or from north to south). It is sighing that outsiders have been left vacant simply because of a strait, as well as years of separatist propaganda.

  • @transfig8724
    @transfig8724 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    As a Chinese, I can say that China's economy and military is really growing fast now. I love my country!

    • @Aly-nq9ot
      @Aly-nq9ot ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but your country is the most polluted area in the world, your water is undrinkable, the air is unbreathable, your birth rate is low, your education is disrupted, financials are a mess, food is toxic...i dont see any bright future in this!

    • @transfig8724
      @transfig8724 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Aly-nq9ot In fact some of the developed countries like Germany and Japan have a low birth rate.

    • @transfig8724
      @transfig8724 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​@@Aly-nq9ot China is now the world's second-largest economy.China has payed lots of effort to fight against poverty. It is now developing in a really high speed. You can see from them video that China's economy and military is growing really fast in the recent years.If you still don't believe that, you can go to China, and ask our people, how much did China changed. Also, look around and see how amazing China is now.

    • @transfig8724
      @transfig8724 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Aly-nq9ot About the food, there are lots of great food in China. If the food is toxic, how would China become such a big country? Go ahead and have a try in China and you will know the truth.

    • @transfig8724
      @transfig8724 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Aly-nq9ot I'm a Chinese and I'm proud of it. It is obvious that China has a very bright future and China is heading towards it in a great speed.

  • @yuluoxianjun
    @yuluoxianjun 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    When USA say you have extremely dangerous weapons,you'd better really have,or...

    • @AAAA-te3rq
      @AAAA-te3rq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      washing powder warning

  • @meowxsquared8678
    @meowxsquared8678 2 ปีที่แล้ว +923

    U.S: (Has over 800 bases overseas)
    China: (Built 1 in Djoubouti)
    Also U.S: *"WE FEEL THREATHENED"*

    • @herman9255
      @herman9255 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No one mentioned even the Djoubouti base is part of a UN mission.

    • @felixliu8102
      @felixliu8102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      absolutely correct

    • @TomTom-zd9ew
      @TomTom-zd9ew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      lol

    • @lassebuch4576
      @lassebuch4576 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it is just the beging, it isn't that hard to build more bases, so they have the right to feel threathened

    • @domitravel795
      @domitravel795 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@lassebuch4576 If the US may do this, others nations may do it also.

  • @TheRealIronMan
    @TheRealIronMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1686

    Friendly reminder in 2021 China's military spending was 1.7% of their GDP while the US was at 3.7%, China's military is growing as the same level as their GDP growth rate, the US military is growing fast without the actual growth rate to back it up, its like the Cold War but this time the US is in the same position as USSR previously did.

    • @kwabenabudulartey7003
      @kwabenabudulartey7003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      If you have cheap labour and you produce inferior goods you are bound to produce more to help your economy.

    • @furikuri23
      @furikuri23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kwabenabudulartey7003 The US must love buying inferior goods then LOL.

    • @Jim_Colbert
      @Jim_Colbert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +487

      @@kwabenabudulartey7003 your phone or computer that you use to type this comment also inferior goods made in china..😅😅

    • @TheRealIronMan
      @TheRealIronMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +376

      @@kwabenabudulartey7003 India has even cheaper labor and produce way more inferior goods, India and China started at the exact same level 30 years ago, now the average wage in China is 6 times more than India, explain that lol

    • @praddumnvats6759
      @praddumnvats6759 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@TheRealIronMan as an Indian i agree it's true..but china lacks the variety of Indian population..which in turn makes it Europe like lol

  • @eliasfarias2302
    @eliasfarias2302 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Twenty years ago the Chinese military was planting 17 billion trees per year, now likely more. No wonder the universe has blessed them with prosperity

  • @NuestraPatriaGrande
    @NuestraPatriaGrande ปีที่แล้ว +57

    China is growing its military slower than Europe and especially the US. The reason for this is that China wants a strong military to support its trade in the world. China is the main trading partner of 140 countries. The US military uses up close a trillion dollars annually on its military to maintain its primacy as the unipolar power of the world.The differences in the military architecture of China and that of Western countries is simply that China´s military is defensive in nature and The West is offensive in nature. One is there to patrol the world and China wants to provide safe passage to itself and others in trade and to ward off piracy. China has a larger fleet for the maneuvers it needs just as the US has a stronger fighting force to stop any geopolitical challenge to its hegemony. The present problem in the US today is that our elites calculate China´s rise as it calculates other rising powers in Western history. China lost a lot by being closed off to the rest of the world. It was invaded by the mongols, Japan, and the US with its allies. It was not until 1949 that the Chinese began a hard struggle to modernize and avoided a US invasion by developing its own atomic bomb by 1964.China wants its territories back and Taiwan is indispensable because it was a part of China and because it presents an existential threat to China´s security in it become a vassal state of the US. It was on the condition that the US accepted that Taiwan is a rebellious autonomous region of China, That China established normal relations with the US in 1972. The US uses the Taiwan situation to agitate the nationalistic fervor of the Chinese. Elites in the US want to provoke a war is it has alrteady done in Ukraine. The US/NATO strategy has failed against Russia and it will fail miserably against China. A wiser approach would be to learn a lot about the Chinese tendencies to close themselves off as a means of avoiding conflict. The Chinese culture approaches conflicts from the perspective of establishing trust and resolving disputes by allowing time to resolve the or solve problems through negotiations with a win-win attitude. This requires knowing your competitor well enough to present a win-win offer. China has survived through many crises and wars. It already has the largest economy as it did prior to its closing off and invasions by Japan and The West. China is a mature civilization. The US can have its hegemony with China´s help. What the world will not accept are unilateral illegal sanctions, invasion of other countries, interventions in the sovereign affairs of other countries and economic black mail.

    • @zix_zix_zix
      @zix_zix_zix 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "China is growing its military slower than Europe and especially the US" - I disagree. Slower than Europe?? First of all, the Europeans do not even want to grow their military. EU political leaders are primarily concerned with other issues and consider military expenditure a waste of their money. Actually, defense budgets in EU have actually been shrinking because of the high inflation affecting the European economy. Also, the US military is clearly NOT growing faster then the PLA either; they Americans are trying to catch up but the capabilities of their industrial base are not on par with the Chinese. PLA Navy's rate of development is absolutely insane.

    • @NuestraPatriaGrande
      @NuestraPatriaGrande 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The U.S. has almost 1 trillion dollars in defense spending! The Chinese defense spending is less than 1 quarter of the U.S. defense budget! Europe has recently increased their defense spending! You are right with respect to manufacturing. The problem for the U.S. and the West in general is that the cost of production is cheaper for China. This enables China to do more for less!! China is developing nation! As China continues to grow the West will fall behind in tech, innovation,and manufacturing !

    • @zix_zix_zix
      @zix_zix_zix 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@NuestraPatriaGrande According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) fact sheet, the US had a military budget of 877.0 bn in 2022, while the PRC had 292.0 bn respectively; that's NOT "less than 1 quarter of the U.S. defense budget", as you claimed; it is actually exactly one third of the US defense budget. I am only mentioning this in the interest of accuracy. European leaders stated that they would increase their military spending because of the Russian threat, but only small countries located near the Russian border have actually made true and substantial new investments in defense. For the big EU countries, these announcements are made mostly for political posturing purposes. Therefore, although overall the defense budget has indeed increased, those increases are unlikely to produce any tangible results, because it is "too little too late". For example, Boris Pistorius, in 2024, Germany’s Minister of Defense, would have EUR 51.8 billion available to him - EUR 1.7 billion more than last year. Together with both the Special Fund of EUR 100 billion that was part of the Zeitenwende announced by Chancellor Olaf Scholz to overhaul Germany’s foreign and security policy and shares from other ministries,, German defense spending for 2024 can be understood as follows: The announced individual contributions from the defense budget (EUR 51.8 billion), the Special Fund (EUR 19.2 billion), and shares from other budgets (about EUR 7 billion) correspond to a total of about EUR 78 billion. This is smaller than 2% of the GDP (2% would require EUR 85 billion in defense spending).

    • @NuestraPatriaGrande
      @NuestraPatriaGrande 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do not doubt your reported figures. The Chinese budget ios much less thjan the US budget. But China is defense oriented while the US is offensive. China will havea blue water navy eventually, as it is not competing with the US. In 5-10 years China may prevent the US from stealing cargo and oil in the high seas or steal Syrian oil from Northern Syria. Until then it will bear the loss.@@zix_zix_zix

  • @yunanan39
    @yunanan39 2 ปีที่แล้ว +494

    There's funny when western say China will invade Taiwan while they still admit Taiwan is part of China

    • @derekgraham5241
      @derekgraham5241 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Regardless of the foreign press or perceived sovereignty, as you state, it would be an invasion and people would die needlessly

    • @derekgraham5241
      @derekgraham5241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ヒナ🌸 name them, please.

    • @derekgraham5241
      @derekgraham5241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ヒナ🌸 thanks for the prompt response. I’ll check them out. You do realize they’re the exception, not the rule tho. :)

    • @derekgraham5241
      @derekgraham5241 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ヒナ🌸 lol, that's one example, do you have any that aren't loose?
      My initial quote is that China looks to invade at the cost of innocent lives.
      What's your defense of that?

    • @levelazn
      @levelazn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@derekgraham5241 ask u.s president candidate andrew yang or chef eddie huang who are both technicallly "taiwanese american" if they identify as chinese

  • @prathapkoththigoda9471
    @prathapkoththigoda9471 2 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    Do another one. Title is "USA military had never stopped growing and invading other countries"

    • @kobe24j
      @kobe24j 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They won't because BBC is a American dog!

    • @JM-gj7de
      @JM-gj7de 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We need a video about your inferiority complex, too. Your tears are delectable.

    • @zaitinmak5671
      @zaitinmak5671 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      USA is always ahead when it comes to military , INVASION infrastructure and creation of REFUGEES 😥 😢 😱

    • @cirle1552
      @cirle1552 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      All of this documentaries and constant talking about statistics military budget about China shows how scared and paranoid they are, in not so far future China will be the biggest economy and military power in the world.

    • @kobe24j
      @kobe24j 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@cirle1552 economy yes, but military no. We don't want to be a warmongering country like US. We just need enough military to protect ourselves!

  • @MrLchao
    @MrLchao 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When you go from zero bases to 1 base, that is a 100% increase.... lol

  • @WanderingSword
    @WanderingSword ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Americans say China lack combative experience. Let's see US battlefield experience post WW2. Korea, stalemate. Vietnam, lost. Afghan, lost. Iraq, lost. That's 1 tie, 3 loses, 0 win. In each of those wars, the US was superior to its rivals in every conceivable way, except will. It is a well known secret that America cannot stomach a long war. The Talibans using AK's and IED's were able to repel the US and their GPS-guided munitions and all sort of stealth figthers. In history, there has ever been such a technologically dominant military force that is defeated with such consistency.

    • @xuany5019
      @xuany5019 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Americans say: As long as we don't speak out, no one will think we have lost. We can selectively report facts.

    • @broflo3875
      @broflo3875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol. Tell me you have no idea what you're talking about without telling me you have no idea what you're talking about.
      Each of those wars have different reasons for ending the way they did. Mostly political. NOTHING to do with any sort of lack of perceived success. In ALL of those wars, the US reigned supreme on the battlefield. There wasn't one battle in Afghanistan where "The Talibans using AK's and IED's were able to repel the US and their GPS-guided munitions and all sort of stealth figthers". That sentence in itself proves you have no idea what you're talking about.
      Furthemore, the US has "stomached" plenty of long wars. The Chinese haven't (in recent history). The Chinese military is joke. The US would decimate them 100%.

    • @WanderingSword
      @WanderingSword 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@broflo3875 you done tripping on stupidity yet? enough with the excuses

    • @broflo3875
      @broflo3875 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WanderingSword Never made an excuse for anything. Your knowledge of history and warfare are severely lacking and, as I stated earlier, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. The US military in itself has rarely been defeated on the battlefield since WW2. Go ahead and name me 3 battles in Iraq or Afghanistan that were relatively evenly matched where the US waived the white flag in surrender. Show me 3 battles where the Taliban, Al Qaeda, or any other force just out fought and out skilled US troops. Don't worry.....I'll wait.

    • @user-0-JonyTao
      @user-0-JonyTao 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Americans have a serious problem. Most soldiers are focused on the benefits of the military, more concerned about their own value, which leads them to fear death. They are only brave in absolute advantage. As soon as they encounter setbacks, they will have thoughts of giving up. Many Chinese soldiers come from poor families, their thinking is relatively simple and straightforward. Influenced by Chinese cultural values, soldiers consider dying on the battlefield as an honor. China has an old saying, '只解沙场为国死,何须马革裹尸还' Understand the history of Chinese warfare, and you will understand.@@broflo3875

  • @joey3291
    @joey3291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +938

    One of the best jokes I ever heard: US starts wars all over the world against terrorism

    • @cantaloupemelonz1533
      @cantaloupemelonz1533 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      LOL

    • @molinarabina4635
      @molinarabina4635 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah thats their propaganda to stole the gold and resoureces usa, nato uk they are all imported terrorist

    • @user-jx1ef5jg6v
      @user-jx1ef5jg6v 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      其实是为了石油

    • @BLAZE-sj6lf
      @BLAZE-sj6lf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      United Snakes regime is the number terrorist organization on earth. PERIOD.

    • @god1808
      @god1808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      lol

  • @tigermo538
    @tigermo538 2 ปีที่แล้ว +735

    Blumberg's tape has two sides, China threat theory and China collapse theory, playing side A today🤣🤣🤣

    • @BOIOLA08
      @BOIOLA08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      To be honnest ccp propaganda does the same with the west. 🤣😂

    • @lvjinbin28
      @lvjinbin28 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@BOIOLA08 when CCP propaganda said USA would collapse?

    • @AKDHFR
      @AKDHFR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BOIOLA08 yea none of upper news are trustable today, my source probably from based on scientific or the dark web.

    • @BOIOLA08
      @BOIOLA08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@lvjinbin28 it says it is in mortal decline all the time. 😉

    • @BOIOLA08
      @BOIOLA08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lvjinbin28 it's all a big game.

  • @nicholascharles9625
    @nicholascharles9625 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Saying America won world War 2 as if the soviet union never existed

  • @VancouverVince
    @VancouverVince ปีที่แล้ว +2

    China should set up nukes in Cuba and Venezuela pointed at Imperial America. LOLOL

  • @kennethwang2004
    @kennethwang2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +737

    4:15 “ We (USA) have hundreds of bases overseas. China has one. so they're really promoting their military power regionally, And so that's one way that they can out-compete the U.S.” what does it mean? China has become one-hundredth of the U.S.A military, but we (U.S.A.) still think China is so aggressive.

    • @keikaku9298
      @keikaku9298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      I believe it means that even though US military in absolute terms is more than China military, at a local level China military can dominate US military. At least that's how I read it.

    • @blackjames1104
      @blackjames1104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      This is just hypocritical USA‘s justice

    • @chengxu2990
      @chengxu2990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +144

      China only spent 1.7% of gdp on the military, while USA spent 4.3% of gdp on the military. and Yes, USA still think China is aggressive

    • @GoToMan
      @GoToMan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@chengxu2990 it’s not about the budget, it’s about the actions

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Right, the PLA budget doesn't include support for the paramilitary fishing fleets ramming and fouling the boats of their neighbors, nor all the "internal security" intelligence and propaganda programs where the spending might exceed that of the military.

  • @liuzhen1220
    @liuzhen1220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1340

    Let me tell you a fact, China's military spending only accounts for 1.7% of GDP, which is comparable to that of Central American Honduras. China's military spending is really low compared to other influential countries in the world.
    Australia's military spending accounts for 2.1% of GDP.
    India's military expenditure accounts for 2.9% of GDP
    US military spending accounts for 3.7% of GDP

    • @adityakarve6808
      @adityakarve6808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      India's is at 2.1% currently I think, and it's dropping.
      Our budget is more or less unchanged, while our GDP grows.
      Kudos to China nonetheless, hope we catch up with you guys soon.

    • @dailydoseofgaming3593
      @dailydoseofgaming3593 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@adityakarve6808 don't comment until we do something. Keep working silently.

    • @adityakarve6808
      @adityakarve6808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      @@dailydoseofgaming3593 what are you on about? I'm stating a fact. India's defence budget to GDP was 2.9% in 2010 I believe. It is was at 2.1% in 2020-2021.
      We have already 'done something'.

    • @liuzhen1220
      @liuzhen1220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      @@adityakarve6808 The military spending data analysis I used is from the World Bank 2020 database~
      It is true that China's military spending has been greatly increased due to economic prosperity, but since the end of the Cold War, China has carried out several large-scale disarmament and strictly controlled the proportion of military spending to GDP. From the data, China's military expenditure is at a very low level. It is obviously unfair when the Western media evaluates the increase of China's military expenditure. We need to pay attention to the increase in China's consumption level and the increase in the salary of military personnel. When it comes to high-end military components, made in China does not mean cheaper.
      China's current military spending is undoubtedly based on a very reasonable position, and it can even be said that it is low. Setting China as an imaginary enemy will instead prompt China to increase the ratio of military expenditure to GDP, and further arouse the arms race in Asia. After all, who would have thought that Australia would one day have more than 10 nuclear-powered submarines.

    • @apvial
      @apvial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Let me tell you another fact: the CCP is LYING about their military spend. It's MUCH higher.

  • @user-eu4fu9ih5u
    @user-eu4fu9ih5u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I really admire China for its development
    You are deserve of a so light future

    • @TF-fu4uv
      @TF-fu4uv ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @seanpruitt6801
      @seanpruitt6801 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes we will see about that when you are under communism

    • @user-eu4fu9ih5u
      @user-eu4fu9ih5u ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seanpruitt6801 as we see poor people who are under capitalism

    • @willdanger6833
      @willdanger6833 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-eu4fu9ih5u Yes because Communism has always worked. BTW China is not a communist country.

    • @user-eu4fu9ih5u
      @user-eu4fu9ih5u ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willdanger6833 yes
      In my opinion china is a communist country but not exactly like Soviet union or north Korea
      Their economic is much open than them

  • @BS-qp8rp
    @BS-qp8rp ปีที่แล้ว +5

    To protect all the hard working from chinese people, china needs to fight the threat from the US and the west!

  • @vajpuabtais6188
    @vajpuabtais6188 2 ปีที่แล้ว +873

    China military spending is high but mostly on soldiers that are at home. US military is biggest but a great amount of the money go to maintaining those 800+ overseas bases and structures.

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Yes. Trump was right to close them unless host countries paid up. All that trade surplus that runs against the US? Yeah, thats what Germany, Korea, Japan should pay the US.

    • @dannyn.6933
      @dannyn.6933 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@TheBooban Silly notion. I would rather our NATO allies step up their investments into military spending. I can respect that many Americans are upset that our spending is not necessarily the most efficient, but by keeping our troops and assets there, we are able to assert a significant amount of influence across the globe.
      Our logistical network remains second to none. No other countries has a worldwide logistical network comparable to the United States. Look at Russia whom we can consider as the third or fourth most powerful country in the world, and they're struggling to invade a country that was once apart of their country, and literally borders their production hubs. We were literally able to easily invade a landlocked mountain country across the world. To get rid of that to go back to an isolationist strategy is basically ceding our influence to countries that can potentially do what we do (ie. China or to a lesser extent the EU).
      Things are looking excellent though. Regardless of whether Russia emerges victorious in the invasion of Ukraine, they've already lost in the grand scheme of things. A clear and firm enemy is making Western countries geopolitically unify in ways we haven't seen in decades.

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      they should at least try to get rid some of that base.

    • @jameskchim8
      @jameskchim8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Just carry on wasting money on those 800+ bases and policing the world and let the US and its infrastructure crumble away, they forgot about their own people. What happened to America first?

    • @wulfw.8452
      @wulfw.8452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Exactly colonies needs to pay up.

  • @owenhoong88
    @owenhoong88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +277

    I'm from Malaysia, when we wanted to build a bridge and looking for suitable partners for collaboration, the Chinese came and said we can work overtime without extra pay, we can work 7 days a week without leave. The whole fricking bridge was built by Chinese. Tells you how the Chinese threatened the world. Not their military seriously. Because if you already lose jobs opportunity with the Chinese, there's no point talking about military

    • @vimalalwaysrocks
      @vimalalwaysrocks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      reminds me of how they built the 1000 bed covid hospital in 10days.

    • @Wingly113
      @Wingly113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      which bridge?

    • @irritatedanglosaxon1705
      @irritatedanglosaxon1705 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @Ivan Lee all bridges

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@vimalalwaysrocks The same one that took in patients while full of roof leaks and uneven surfaces that other countries would have done cheaper and more effectively with trucks and tents?

    • @admiralwei
      @admiralwei 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@nur-azhar Nope! ASEAN countries do not stand either on US or China side (includes Singapore). They pursuit tighten relationships with US on military side and China on economy side. Singapore clearly told US that they don't want to choose side between US and China.

  • @BTS-zq2vy
    @BTS-zq2vy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    At least they are developing mainly a defense force and not forces to invade and occupy other countries

  • @mydogluka7164
    @mydogluka7164 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A modern army that guards peace as strong as any, even the enemy will respect them !

  • @MatthewCahn
    @MatthewCahn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +829

    China still spends a fraction of America's defense spending on their military. We should be more worried about their science, infrastructure, healthcare, and education spending which far outstrips that of the United States.

    • @JohnDoe-oq4zs
      @JohnDoe-oq4zs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Healthcare in China is literally one of the worst in the world!

    • @lordjustice6994
      @lordjustice6994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +240

      @@JohnDoe-oq4zs def not true. In terms of affordability and quality it is leaps and bounds better than the US healthcare system (aka insurance industry)

    • @cwaddle
      @cwaddle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Its a socialism vs capitalism. The Soviet never made it work but Chinas socialism might make them productive in some ways. We will find out

    • @yourmommashouse
      @yourmommashouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Uh oh, this one is broken ☝🏻 Our misdirection dept will be right with you.

    • @Maelstromme
      @Maelstromme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      US spends the most per capita on Healthcare and Education in the world. Our issue is bureaucratic waste and an overcomplicated system, as well as pharmaceutical and higher education monopolies driving up the price.

  • @sqian2004
    @sqian2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +213

    ...and guess who's the reason for China increasing its military spending? Yes, it's the USA's presence in the south China sea

    • @BOIOLA08
      @BOIOLA08 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, the US is present there building islands and occupying other countries reefs... World be ware!

    • @sqian2004
      @sqian2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@BOIOLA08 XD "other countries' reefs'", I LOL-ed. You know, when a land conflict happens, that means that legally that land's belonging is undefined yet. It's up to the two countries in conflict to decide how to settle their territories through negotiations and benefits trading, and NOT UP TO THE UNITED STATES' INTERFERENCE.

    • @BOIOLA08
      @BOIOLA08 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sqian2004 no it doesn't mean that. In China's case (9 dash line or more recently 4 dah) it is settled. The “Permanent Court of Arbitration” ruled illegal the chinese claim. The US only enforces freedom of navigation. As for Ukraine your argument (not to mention the russian argument) is absolutely riddicullous.

    • @sqian2004
      @sqian2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@BOIOLA08 The "permanent court of arbitration"(PCA) is NOT the "International court of justice" of the United Nations, so it is valid legally only when both parties agree to hand the case to PCA. China never agreed to hand the case to PCA, thus PCA accepting the case and making a single-sided decision is in essence illegal :)

    • @BOIOLA08
      @BOIOLA08 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sqian2004 it's legal. Not binding is another matter. Therefor applying your argument, if everyone has to agree and the countries that believe in freedom of navigation, do not agree, then there will never be a solution. ;)

  • @havanascp9602
    @havanascp9602 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Policing the world means. Destroying the world lol

  • @havanascp9602
    @havanascp9602 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    China Russia invest in hypersonic missiles. Usa let’s keep building carriers. Lol

  • @willorwell
    @willorwell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    "Taiwan might be China's Vietnam." I guess we still haven't learnt anything about why the US failed in Vietnam.

    • @VectorGaming4080
      @VectorGaming4080 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The problem is Taiwan is far more important to the security and stability of the world than Vietnam ever was.

    • @isoboy2125
      @isoboy2125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The irony is that US is involved in both.

    • @user-mr3kc9rf9x
      @user-mr3kc9rf9x ปีที่แล้ว +5

      看来你不了解中国和台湾的关系😂,没关系~你的国家并没有和台湾建立外交关系,这是为什么呢?你需要了解~

    • @user-xm6kj5kp9u
      @user-xm6kj5kp9u ปีที่แล้ว

      台湾一直是中国的领土,相反你们在指手画脚地评论中国的内战

    • @gattlinggun9881
      @gattlinggun9881 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      G00D FANTASY AMER!CA LGBTQ TR4NSGENDER GENERAT!0N!!!
      🤭🤭🤭

  • @nikolatasev4948
    @nikolatasev4948 2 ปีที่แล้ว +646

    If one country wants to be able to fight in its own back yard, and another wants to be able to fight anywhere on the globe, I think one of these two has a better justification for their military spending.

    • @pastasoo
      @pastasoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      China's army lacks the mass transports to engage in invasions across the globe. On the other hand, there is a country in the west with 100x more transports ready to invade any country on a whim. It really goes to show whose army is a defensive one.

    • @LegendNinja41
      @LegendNinja41 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      facts.

    • @nolanvargas9573
      @nolanvargas9573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      This is exactly what I was thinking. “China can outcompete the United States regionally” okay so China can beat us…In China?

    • @kenllacer
      @kenllacer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      The only downside is that people like me who live right next to China and Russia's backyard get the short end of the stick whenever tensions arise. It's not nice to live next door to countries like China, Russia, and perhaps even the US. It's almost like being a moon orbiting Jupiter.

    • @GoogleGebruiker
      @GoogleGebruiker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@pastasoo that's why they treathen Taiwan right? Or try to intimidate India?

  • @yctai6151
    @yctai6151 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    if US is expensive, US need to out source!

  • @user-df2uu3qp3y
    @user-df2uu3qp3y ปีที่แล้ว +10

    *The art of war teaches us to rely not on the likelihood of the enemy's not coming, but on our own readiness to receive him; not on the chance of his not attacking, but rather on the fact that we have made our position unassailable.*
    *Sun Tzu*

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Prepare for the rain that is not coming

  • @dylanteo2185
    @dylanteo2185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +379

    we learn the same lesson being colonized by Western nations, China's lesson was harder being invaded and divided by Western nation and Japan in the early 1900s. Western nations taught to prevent being subjugated again, strong military protection is needed.

    • @danielloh2166
      @danielloh2166 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      u are Malaysian or Singaporean?

    • @cantaloupemelonz1533
      @cantaloupemelonz1533 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Will China emulate the West? That's what scares people.

    • @quinnishappy5309
      @quinnishappy5309 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes I mean look at Hong kong a super economy until china got its hands on it. Look at Japan which ruled china until western powers dismantled the empire, and now look Japan top economic power. Look at South Korea, after the Korean war, super economic power.
      If china had been colonized by the west you would by history standards be a much better place than you are.

    • @user-dc9oq2pr6v
      @user-dc9oq2pr6v 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielloh2166 LONG LIVE THE CCP!

    • @lihenry8081
      @lihenry8081 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      💯💯💯

  • @rwksasc
    @rwksasc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +195

    No worries. China does not spend 750 billion dollars a year on the military.

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Currency manipulation and lack of disclosure means no one really knows how much China spends on its military.

    • @jasonlewis460
      @jasonlewis460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      TRUTH

    • @donchen4906
      @donchen4906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@texaswunderkind really? do you really thing US military will fully disclose what they spent? like spending 6million on 9 goats?

    • @apvial
      @apvial 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@donchen4906 Many many more checks and balances inn the US. China is a black box

    • @jacklazarus432
      @jacklazarus432 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well, strictly, they don't need to. In order to contest the near-periphery of their territory (i.e. Taiwan) they don't need to upkeep a global system of infrastructure, a Two Ocean Navy with limited deployability and readiness, and the myriad of other spending obligations that the US is shackled by (which is not helped by the Mil-Industrial Complex ballooning prices)

  • @ericc9570
    @ericc9570 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When the American thinks about you day or night 24/7 , you've arrived , well done

  • @momak6977
    @momak6977 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Western propaganda everywhere

  • @chriswestwood3289
    @chriswestwood3289 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    Why is it a problem? We are attacking China every single day. If me as Chinese leader, I would spend double of American budget to match up.

    • @hussainashraf5179
      @hussainashraf5179 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      problem is china wants saudi arab to ditch the petro dollar system and if that happen america would go bankrupt

    • @fearson7831
      @fearson7831 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      CCP is a threat

    • @chriswestwood3289
      @chriswestwood3289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fearson7831 yes it's threat to capital greedy.

    • @fearson7831
      @fearson7831 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chriswestwood3289 what about the genocide and atrocities they are currently committing?

    • @chriswestwood3289
      @chriswestwood3289 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fearson7831 So you do believe in what media feeds you. What a fool. If there is genocide, after more than 70 years of ruling by "evil CPC", these minorities would've disappeared long time ago, just like first nation in America. The opposite is true - there is no genocide. All are part of belittling China campaign by US. 99% of the information floating in western world is false and misinformation. If China is so brutal, you won't see Chinese travellers around the world like those of North Korean. If China is so bad, it cannot be the second largest economy in the world. If China is so evil, there should not have any western companies in China. Don't you think? Wake up, if you are a decent human. You do realize that China is constantly under attack, since 1800, not just today or because of the CPC ruling.

  • @maize09blue
    @maize09blue 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1034

    Sun Tzu's "winning without war" is working well for China. China is advancing in technology, social global influence, economy, ideology, and structural race, amongst others, without ever wasting time, energy and money towards a current war.
    The US and other western powers have been pre-occupied with war for the better part of the last 3-4 decades. Significant resources and time have poured in towards those conflicts, thus slowing advancements in areas highlighted above. To advance faster and more efficient than your counterparts without being involve in conflict is making China far stronger than any Western nations wasting energy on current wars/conflicts they likely may never win.
    This is also the reason why, in my opinion, China is more hesitant in starting a war when compared to western nations. They are winning for not fighting. It would be wiser to allow your rivals to fight themselves into resource exhaustion and let yourself grow in the process.

    • @pastasoo
      @pastasoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      China fights with BRI while America fights with bombs and sanctions.

    • @redakteur3613
      @redakteur3613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      China isn’t developing fast enough. The West is Well-Developed and China in its current state can’t grow and can’t be any counterpart with this political system. It isn’t growing anymore and its growth in past 14 years was less than the USA. Chine grew but year by year the USA got richer and richer at a faster rate. They use absolutely different technic because ideology and bla bla bla is seen like a threat, and China is seen like a rival

    • @bryanlowsengteck3784
      @bryanlowsengteck3784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@redakteur3613 usa is full of homeless people and U keep barking2 bla...... Non stop 🛑 haha doggy 🐶

    • @kidink4562
      @kidink4562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +111

      @@redakteur3613 were do you get your data from

    • @redakteur3613
      @redakteur3613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@kidink4562 Wikipedia GDP statistic
      Plus China’s economy shouldn’t grow slower than 5% per year because of credit burden - and it f
      grows slower now, that’s why their housing market is falling apart

  • @kishaniramsey5913
    @kishaniramsey5913 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    China must never grow arrogant like the UasSA and the West. Apply Sun Tzu's theory is important. Even during peace time the armed forces must be maintained and the weaponries be upgraded constantly. Not to fail like the West. Maintaining peace and prosperity for everyone Chinese and others must be an important foreign policies and minimise enemies. This way Chinese's prosperity and development will continue forward,

  • @roguesheep1747
    @roguesheep1747 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The war on terror ? A war brings terror

    • @kingwing3203
      @kingwing3203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The the United States of America has launched wars everywhere, slaughtering millions of people, causing tens of millions of people to be displaced and economic losses of hundreds of billions.

  • @user-pt8og3ls5x
    @user-pt8og3ls5x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    When you are growing strong you are evil, a threat, a peace breaker... When you are too strong you are a peacekeeper, order maintainer.

    • @midnightvibes5485
      @midnightvibes5485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Western "Democracies" be like.

    • @robertoshea9825
      @robertoshea9825 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@midnightvibes5485 Western double standard

    • @MamacitaBonita
      @MamacitaBonita 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      China likes Panda Express. Orange chicken yummy!!!!

    • @enriquezhao5674
      @enriquezhao5674 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Guess no one like second place

    • @jannemahonen4508
      @jannemahonen4508 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you like to be rather ruled by CCP than the west then Goodluck.

  • @ramennoodles337
    @ramennoodles337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    US: having 800+ bases across the world
    China: Trying to build one
    US: We feel threatened

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol

    • @wangherr4090
      @wangherr4090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      哈哈哈哈,真实,true~

    • @0doubledseven589
      @0doubledseven589 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How many shipping ports does Chyna control. Don't forget about the infrastructure and base Chyna is building in Africa. They will not forget about the silkroad initiative

    • @inglam
      @inglam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@0doubledseven589 learn to type first

    • @RA-ms3je
      @RA-ms3je ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@0doubledseven589 and how does that concern you?? . We Africans are not complaining and never elected you our mouthpiece

  • @joekerr7828
    @joekerr7828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not fast enough....
    China needs to have at least 10K nukes, half of them facing the US !

  • @ziguanqiao2022
    @ziguanqiao2022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    how many country has China inveded?how many the USA and uk?

  • @junbaosu8031
    @junbaosu8031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    US have more than 300 military base around world, those base circled China, this is the reason of developing military in China

    • @sleepyjoe4529
      @sleepyjoe4529 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      300? try 800 not counting CIA blacksites

    • @marx4360
      @marx4360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A pithy explanation

    • @Cheesecake99YearsAgo
      @Cheesecake99YearsAgo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@marx4360 a short and direct response to the threat from the US

    • @bobbeagle6931
      @bobbeagle6931 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@Cheesecake99YearsAgo If you lived in Asia, you would singing a different tune.

    • @waisinglee1509
      @waisinglee1509 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow...I am amazed that your comment got any likes.

  • @harryw4480
    @harryw4480 2 ปีที่แล้ว +757

    "Taiwan will be able to mobilize a great amount of military reserve."
    The "military reserve" actually means college students who had gone through a 4-month summer training camp who barely knows how to fire a shot.

    • @KennyNGA
      @KennyNGA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Well you see in ukraine how effective it is

    • @flyingtanks9313
      @flyingtanks9313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      @@KennyNGA ukrainians train for much more

    • @Black-Peter
      @Black-Peter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      @@flyingtanks9313 also Ukraine has kind been in a war on there Eastside

    • @octaneho3576
      @octaneho3576 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Black-Peter thats right

    • @davyliyang
      @davyliyang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KennyNGA Yep, China better take notes.

  • @dubdub9464
    @dubdub9464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your content is so touching

  • @user-fp3gy2dx4t
    @user-fp3gy2dx4t ปีที่แล้ว +12

    希望未来的世界,是美国 中国 印度 欧盟 俄罗斯形成的多极世界,和平友好,正常的商业性竞争

    • @wangjutao
      @wangjutao 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      想都不要这样想。要是这样下去20年,你看看西方世界还能剩下什么?和平对西方来说意味着死亡,你说它们会跟我们和平么?

    • @limitspace-rp9zr
      @limitspace-rp9zr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      正解

  • @BaneHydra
    @BaneHydra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +782

    The part about China producing "weapons that cost less to build than what they destroy" is really critical. A lot of the US budget is spent on horrendously overpriced equipment that purely exists to shovel money into the pockets of defense contractors, there were stories of troops in Afghanistan getting ridicoulusly expensive planes/helicopters that they had no idea what to do with and couldn't actually use, that are now in the hands of the Taliban, still in factory condition. The private defense corporations make generous donations to individual US lawmakers, and in return they pay them billions upon billions of taxpayer money to make overpriced weaponry, regardless of need or efficiency.

    • @freedumb_3.0
      @freedumb_3.0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Expensive food.

    • @quinnishappy5309
      @quinnishappy5309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      no it really isnt. If the budget is 3.5% of GDP and you have trained well paid well practised and experienced military it doesnt matter about your slight overspending to the pockets of a few,(as if in China this doesnt happen) Hypersonics dont outcompete traditional ballistics and are far more expensive than them to use whilst being more fragile. You are overly sensitive to narratives about the west but not if China and its exacting corruption and manipulation. But overall its lack of combatants in practise of actual war, which as we see in Russia invasion causing real problems against the Ukrainians.

    • @user-wr8sm6jp6j
      @user-wr8sm6jp6j 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@quinnishappy5309 You said that hypersonic weapons are the same as ordinary ballistic missiles, then I ask you, why does the United States spend huge sums of money to develop hypersonic missiles? corruption? The corruption of the US military is probably not much better than that of China. At least, the corrupt generals in China have been sent to prison, and the US is suspended at most.

    • @woodjames8895
      @woodjames8895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@quinnishappy5309 You call it "slightly"??😂

    • @quinnishappy5309
      @quinnishappy5309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@woodjames8895 Its not the military budget that has the USA in debt.

  • @benganchan1420
    @benganchan1420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    While america spent 20 years in afghanistan and spent $2,200,000,000,000 for the military misadventure there , china uses up $1,000,000,000,000 in 12 years to build 39,000 km of high speed rail to connect all 180 1st,2nd tier cities in 32 provinces

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Which has been losing money (even when including the overall effects from growth in fapiao receipts) because passengers and mail don't pay that much, and is now bleeding itself to near shutdown with the collapse of regular travels under surprise COVID lockdowns. What China really would have benefitted from was a buildout of freight-capable rail.

    • @briancheng8311
      @briancheng8311 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@doujinflip you don't know jack sh*t about china clearly you never been there keep watching fake news boi

    • @dongshengdi773
      @dongshengdi773 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      building infrastructure to Nowhere . Best Examples are ghost cities of China .

    • @Davionknight1
      @Davionknight1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@doujinflip You are looking solely at the rail operator's P&L which isn't exactly why China embarked on HSR. Covid lockdowns are only temporary, they played the wrong card with a non-MRNA vaccination strategy which delayed their opening up.
      In under 20 years, China went from importing trains for their newly built subway system to exporting HSR technology, which translates to know-how and job creation. Real estate, tourism, industries and businesses grew alongside rail corridors. Factor in the number of cars off the roads and carbon emissions.
      The investment and pace of building infrastructure is something unique, in that only China can pull this off with its population density and single-party rule to cut through red tape.

    • @cinpeace353
      @cinpeace353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@doujinflip lol, you have no idea.

  • @johnlee-yo8jc
    @johnlee-yo8jc ปีที่แล้ว

    Surprisingly objective from Bloomberg.

  • @markthompson6540
    @markthompson6540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    loosing industrial capacity is one of the major downfalls of the western world.

  • @ksgrmdsdl2383
    @ksgrmdsdl2383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +244

    5:35 When you said United States could have built 10 of those but fought war in Afghanistan, I felt it. It cannot get as brutally honest as that, especially from a Western media.

    • @michaeldormehl5128
      @michaeldormehl5128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It impressive how hard the afgans resist civilization no? 2000 years from now they'll be doing the exact same thing

    • @voto75
      @voto75 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah , and they always tell the truth

    • @cyberpunk2978
      @cyberpunk2978 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      No... US couldn't build 10 of those. Because Petro dollar and regime change are easy money compare to infrastructure construction.

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I don't think usa can even build one of those. Usa doesn't have the mass infrastructure building capability that china does. It will cost usa 100x more to build what china has built and take 100x as long. And that's if they can get past all the red tape of their government and laws to begin with. Same as usas military. They are always Rip off, but at least usa has domestic military industrial capability and political will for military projects. Usa doesn't have massive infrastructure construction ability like china where it can build 40,000 km of high speed rail in 10-15 years and for fraction of the price or the political will, or the economy of scale to compete vs china. Even if they had the private domestic companies, their laws and system of government doesn't allow such speed or priced to match or compete with china's.
      That's why even now, Biden has tried to do build back better world to rival BRI yet no one has taken the deal. Everyone knows it's bs and a bad deal/debt trap(for real lol) and rather deal with china.

    • @davidmckeon5995
      @davidmckeon5995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      and to think how many innocent american lives were sacrificed to have an excuse to fight arab countries..

  • @krelldragon151
    @krelldragon151 2 ปีที่แล้ว +300

    A strong country must have a strong military . The strongest country must have the most trimmest military. This documentary implies others cannot have a big military except the US. Chinese ought to have a military 4x the US. So that it won’t get bullied with all sorts of economic and military means .

    • @stasb.3832
      @stasb.3832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nerd

    • @divinedragon17
      @divinedragon17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@stasb.3832 you sounds like a bully back in highschool

    • @fahimrind9714
      @fahimrind9714 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      no it doesn't say that, it's an american video for american viewers informing them of the geopolitical struggles their country is going to face. Why should any chinese person complain about that, have you seen the turds chinese state media churns out on a regular basis? Get a hold of yourself

    • @simonsong1743
      @simonsong1743 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@fahimrind9714 Your geopolitical struggles all the way extend to China, yet you expect people in China shouldn't pay attention on what you are doing.

    • @gothicgolem2947
      @gothicgolem2947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How does this documentary imply that in any way? And a strong Chinese military won’t stop sanctions if they do something like Russia and most of the world turns against them

  • @TelpPov
    @TelpPov ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One country that builds 40% of the ships in the world. A country that is a hallow shell of itself used to have that capability.

  • @Nasserattaf
    @Nasserattaf ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Who knows how many tanks and other military vehicles they have in store? Probably way more than the we know since they have so many people to work on them.

  • @matthummel1279
    @matthummel1279 2 ปีที่แล้ว +133

    Love how as a US taxpayer we are somehow paying the biggest military bill in history while also losing the arms race. Great job by Washington as always.

    • @chunh6741
      @chunh6741 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aren't you proud that your tax money is going to product the entire globe.

    • @CoreIation
      @CoreIation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ??? What are you listening to? We can't absolutely dominate everywhere so we are losing?

    • @femiairboy94
      @femiairboy94 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@CoreIation why must you dominate? Why not build infrastructure for poor countries and benefit. Win-win

    • @shisidishaoxia
      @shisidishaoxia ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@femiairboy94

    • @alfredoelbombo3423
      @alfredoelbombo3423 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      the largest part of your military bill goes into the pockets of the weapon lobby but not into the weapons

  • @yummyfunnydiscovery
    @yummyfunnydiscovery 2 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    What has China exported in the past? Trade, infrastructure or war? When one country is dominant, you see what happened in the last 20 years, is it really world peace? The world needs multi-polar development, rather than being dictated by one country.

    • @jdanon203
      @jdanon203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      A multi-polar world is all fine and dandy, but Russia and China are trash countries which is why as much as they fashion themselves as superpowers, no one wants to hitch their wagon to those regimes or emigrate there compared to western countries. I mean China and Russia are both still in imperial expansion mode in the year 2022 and are trying to annex land and sea from their neighbors. The modern day superpower does not do that, and I thought the humans would have learned their lessons after the two world wars, but China and Russia won't be happy until they destroy humanity and the planet with their nukes because they are petulant little babies when they don't get their way.

    • @mylet2658
      @mylet2658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      China exports Fetynal across the globe

    • @unscinfinity3337
      @unscinfinity3337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      yeah that's true but a authoritarian regime who commits genocide shouldn't be the one to have such power. Also diid you forget about tibet,india and north korea? and soon taiwan

    • @joek7031
      @joek7031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@unscinfinity3337 F out here with your western propaganda..

    • @jasonlewis460
      @jasonlewis460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@unscinfinity3337 dont forget the native indigenous people.

  • @bhubestakesoponsatien1143
    @bhubestakesoponsatien1143 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They have too , see what US is surrounding China , just the tiny Japanese island etc…

  • @thegoldenchild7527
    @thegoldenchild7527 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember when everyone try to learn how to operate my space shuttles

  • @kraja2510
    @kraja2510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I hope China and Russia will become super power of the world and bring peace.. usa and nato need to get thrown out of any peace deals

  • @donl1279
    @donl1279 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    US spent 4x budget on military than China, which is also problematic.

    • @isoboy2125
      @isoboy2125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With less than a third of China's population. 🙃

    • @jahlahbrine843
      @jahlahbrine843 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@isoboy2125 nope The largest country population of China in the world

    • @SC-bc2yh
      @SC-bc2yh ปีที่แล้ว

      It spends more on mugs

    • @tylersoto7465
      @tylersoto7465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China can produce things a lot cheaper and larger scale. US military is stretch out to over 800 military bases in the world so that's why US military is getting stressed and that US society is degrading fast and economy worn out etc , policing the world for peace and stability is expensive to keep . China does have the advanced economic industry, infrastructure, resources and technology to police the world by using it's big defensive navy by building dozens of small navy bases to defend the area around them keeping the peace and stability in the world and building air force bases too can help with places inland that ships cant reach etc

  • @geoff9858
    @geoff9858 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Global Guardian... 😂😂😂 Global Hagemon is the more correct term.

  • @william254
    @william254 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Someone is feeling threatened because they can't keep up.

  • @annoyedcat9291
    @annoyedcat9291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    Basically, the US wants to maintain its hegemony while China is a rising power that is challenging that status quo

    • @user-fh6ki8sq7p
      @user-fh6ki8sq7p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      If you see someone saying contradicting, double standard things, there must be a hidden, single standard behind their words. This concept works all the times :)

    • @forgaoqiang
      @forgaoqiang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      simple answer

    • @quinnishappy5309
      @quinnishappy5309 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It really isnt, if you knew anything about it in the slightest bit, you would find that is all just a narrative from china.

    • @quinnishappy5309
      @quinnishappy5309 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@annoyedcat9291 I cant understand what youre trying to tell me what I said. I wrote you my thoughts you dont have to recollect them in some badly formed sentences that dont make any sense.
      China has many narratives, that its going to over throw the USA and the west, it cant, it doesnt have the capabilities to do so economically or militarily.
      It tries to push anti European colonialist negative narratives into the modern world which was 100s of years ago whilst 70 years ago it killed tens of millions of its won people.
      If china was in power you wont be able to have this conversation, luckily for us their corruption and incompetence will see the CCP out within 15 years.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      US had its way with Mitsubishi of Japan. Mitsubishi paid a hefty fine and handed its crown jewel to US.
      Japan had the US semi-conductor industry on its knees. 😁😁
      US had its way with Alstom of France. US jailed the executive, Altom paid a hefty fine, and GE acquired the subsidiary at below market.
      Huawei CFO was a different story altogether. Huawei is still standing.

  • @hhydar883
    @hhydar883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +259

    I think its not their military US should be worried about but their economic advancements. They are so bloody hardworking. I wish my country was like this.

    • @MidoriLetsPlay
      @MidoriLetsPlay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What country are you from?

    • @WaiKoH
      @WaiKoH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@MidoriLetsPlay I’m from Italy and I own a big property portfolio and only Chinese people I like to deal business with as they are easy going and work hours that Western people can’t do. 11am to 12am and look after kids as they work. I’m now selling a property to a Chinese family who started with almost nothing.

    • @LeMerch
      @LeMerch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      You don’t think the US or Europe is hard working?? Hahaha ok

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@LeMerch yea lol. this guy confuses "hard working" with "illegal and inuhaminitarian labour"

    • @gebys4559
      @gebys4559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Actually China is one of the least productive countries. Hence why ridiculous hours were not much gets done. Similiar contrast is seen in Europe were "hardworking" countries like Germany average 30h/week whilst "lazy" countries like Greece do 45h/week.

  • @user-nv5zi7tg6h
    @user-nv5zi7tg6h 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the 7% increase in PLA budget is for the unexpected costly maintenance of their MADE IN CHINA hardwares😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @asleytamkei4323
    @asleytamkei4323 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why should they not dominate in their own backyard?. QUESTIONS, AND QUESTIONS AND MORE SAME QUESTIONS. Duh!

  • @gloria1559
    @gloria1559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Solve inside problems before exaggerating outside threats.

    • @freemanol
      @freemanol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Easier to scare people than to fix real problems

    • @brianhsieh7984
      @brianhsieh7984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agreed China should totally do that.

    • @youmemeyou
      @youmemeyou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brianhsieh7984 did your brain cells forgot it should be US instead of China?

    • @tinaandro1178
      @tinaandro1178 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      With the inside problems I agree but I don't think they are exaggerating the threat although I hope so.China will not attack US but they might attack Taiwan ( tensions are really bad atm between them) and because of the Agreement US will be involved which puts them on the battlefield.There are also a lot of protests happening because of China in some Asian countries and now we all have a problem...I really hope they are exaggerating but to be honest I didn't believe anyone saying Russia will attack and now...In my opinion it's better to expect the best but prepare for the worst.

    • @brianhsieh7984
      @brianhsieh7984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@youmemeyou Forget*
      LOL the irony

  • @dengxiaopinggaming5500
    @dengxiaopinggaming5500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    I'm so impressed what China has become, it's like watching an empire grow in real time.

    • @eddiefly1839
      @eddiefly1839 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      just getting worse and worse

    • @zhui937
      @zhui937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@eddiefly1839 in your dreams

    • @eddiefly1839
      @eddiefly1839 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@zhui937 Just you wait young padawan

    • @eddiefly1839
      @eddiefly1839 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Artonix2000 okey? Idc about that. Meant that its a dictator ship leading country that hates human rights.

    • @amari2509
      @amari2509 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      impressive they are using naz! ww2 strats 🤣🤣

  • @wallacesouza2678
    @wallacesouza2678 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    putting our time and effort in activities and
    investments that will yielda profitable return in the
    future is what we should be aiming for. success
    depends on the actions or steps you take to achieve
    it.

    • @jessicahart490
      @jessicahart490 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have incurred so much losses trading on my
      own..I trade well on demo. But I think the real
      market is manipulated. Can anyone help me
      out or at least tell me what I'm doing wrong

  • @user-ft1nl4hl6s
    @user-ft1nl4hl6s ปีที่แล้ว +18

    China's GDP is actually larger than the official figure because several wealthy provinces underreported in order to pay less tax
    So the military expenditure is actually more than the official one. Considering the purchasing power, China's military expenditure is actually similar to the US or even a little more.

    • @andrewdonis7995
      @andrewdonis7995 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You can say the same for the United States and every other world power. GDP #’s and military size are definitely bigger than what they claim.

    • @user-ft1nl4hl6s
      @user-ft1nl4hl6s ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrewdonis7995 According to China's system, there is no doubt that the gap between China's actual GDP and the official GDP is the largest.

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China literally fakes everything, including their GDP numbers. Even Chinese Communist Leaders admit to this.

  • @bl5752
    @bl5752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +245

    Yet... the US's military spending is still more than the next 9 highest military spending combined (including China). So what's the point of this video? The Second or Third most powerful military is still nothing compared to America's military might (nor does anyone have more bases). Also, the US has its NATO allies, among others, meaning it still has more military capacity than any other nation in history. Also, talking about the potential for "wartime production" is ridiculous. Every serious military analyst since the 1980s can tell you that any global war would be a Come As You Are War, meaning there would be no time for mass production because any global conflict between nuclear powers would quickly spiral into a nuclear war. This whole report is ridiculous. People trying to rationalise global war as if nuclear weapons don't exist.

    • @panglilla868
      @panglilla868 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      The point here is to
      Make you feel the fear and want to support the one side narrative by western medias, the fact is that China never invaded any other country.

    • @kiebee5411
      @kiebee5411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The military spending is mostly irrelevant side by side. China spends about 500 billion in PPP terms, which is all that matters when it manufactures its own equipment, and similarly has no where near the commitments of the US.

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      China builds a state of the art destroyer (type 055) for 600m and in record time. The US needs 3B to do the same.

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Taiwan is not protected by the US nuclear umbrella so your comment is ridiculous.

    • @svenvdw4894
      @svenvdw4894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@panglilla868 Tibet, Vietnam...

  • @jerrylin2044
    @jerrylin2044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +154

    The US is too focused on other countries problems instead of itself, while China doesn’t have this problem to worry about, at least not as much.

    • @garyp4374
      @garyp4374 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      they have been brainwashing adults to buy their toys for 20 years and now the dumbing down of the world is complete and they're making trillions of dollars out of it which is why they released the virus so everybody was trapped at home and could only spend money with them

    • @Trgn
      @Trgn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's just Western elites trying to cover up failure, incompetency, misleading their own people, shifting away attention and from bearing any responsibility by blaming it on external countries. Before China it was Japan, Russian, Iran, North Korea bla bla. And their citizenz are of no better culture, enjoying and festering in any toxic, warmonger politics they are fed with, to feel dignified and fake superior. It's a heavily brainwashed toxic culture and society. West dooming itself but still try to blame on others like they always do, so funny

    • @Trgn
      @Trgn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@garyp4374 You a fine example of US education. I see. Try learn any another language to see the world better perhaps haha

    • @Trgn
      @Trgn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garyp4374 Pandemic could start anywhere. By your logic US must also released Spanish flu and Swine flu to the world right? Seem conspiracy is gaining more ground in the West and no rationality left.

    • @garyp4374
      @garyp4374 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Trgn do not insult me i am not american

  • @ilhambenih
    @ilhambenih 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While US teenagers dancing tiktok and identified themselves as iphone, more Chinese teenagers are studying rocket sciences 😅

    • @user-vv2xs9qj3o
      @user-vv2xs9qj3o 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly 💯😅
      So called modernity

  • @lazy-i1091
    @lazy-i1091 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s been growing for the past 25 years and will continue to grow until 2049. That’s not fast.

  • @oceanman3996
    @oceanman3996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    The screen you are looking at right is most likely made in China 🇨🇳

    • @mansoorkhan9461
      @mansoorkhan9461 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes 😳 Hawaeii

    • @letisriva8581
      @letisriva8581 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes iPhone

    • @tianshunzhao239
      @tianshunzhao239 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Be confident, the whole product

    • @Roero
      @Roero 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The cutting edge chips China need for developing critical military weapons (and much more then weapons) are made only thanks to US tech

    • @Syae22
      @Syae22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep

  • @shuaige3360
    @shuaige3360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    You « forgot » to say that China spend quite small percentage of their GDP in military… and that they basically only increase the military spending at the same speed as the GDP increase.

    • @user-uv7uz5bu7c
      @user-uv7uz5bu7c 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China's military expenditure is very low after apportioning it to 2 million soldiers

    • @RySu-ux1ev
      @RySu-ux1ev 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-uv7uz5bu7c new data, just 1 million

    • @hidefreek6905
      @hidefreek6905 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-uv7uz5bu7c Military needs upkeep cost after all.

    • @opporancisis5834
      @opporancisis5834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they literally said that in the beginning of the video

  • @omenani
    @omenani 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    China is also now competitive in space, with thier own space station, and the only other country besides the U.S with an active rover on Mars.

  • @krevula
    @krevula ปีที่แล้ว

    The military is growing but when last were they in an actual war? That is a big difference. How effective are their military leaders?

  • @hylacinerea970
    @hylacinerea970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +893

    while the belt and road initiative is very important strategically it’s not all about military power. it’d be more apt to call it economic power. china understands what it does best is exporting things, if it creates infrastructure to secure and expand that trade, it supplies the country with long term growth. it also fosters an image of china as philanthropic. china’s next largest service sector is construction, those laborers must be kept busy somewhere, somehow, to keep the ball rolling

    • @dsw86
      @dsw86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      I believe China will do well keeping up the belt and road initiative. Just can't be standing down to Russia. There are key trade routes through eastern Europe (Ukraine especially) and central Asia. Russia can be a friend at times but they do impose a limit on Chinese expansion. This Russian war tips the scales in China's favour, so don't mind keeping that ball rolling.

    • @Rex-ww4cw
      @Rex-ww4cw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +102

      @@lilyandwill111 it's been proven over and over that it's not a debt trap. Use your brain

    • @xxPlaceboxx
      @xxPlaceboxx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@Rex-ww4cw No it hasn't. It just proved that the debt isn't used to take over ports in other countries. Loans from China are incredibly predatory with high-interest rates benefiting china over the country their there to help. So it is a debt trap. There has not been any significant progress in the belt and road initiative. UsE yOUr BRaiN

    • @Rex-ww4cw
      @Rex-ww4cw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      @@xxPlaceboxx maybe you should actually look at the belt and road project directly. Train in Kenya that's part of the belt and road initiative already in action. B&R already built a high quality highway from East Pakistan to West Pakistan. This is just 2 of the hundred project that's ongoing for the belt and road initiative. Where exactly is the "Not been any significant progress in belt and road initiative" at ? UsE yOuR bRaIn🤡🤡

    • @prokaki1234
      @prokaki1234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      @@xxPlaceboxx no one force those country to sign those loan agreement. Its the leader who wanted the loan. Xi did not put a gun on their head to sign it

  • @ronaldronald8819
    @ronaldronald8819 2 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    I am sorry to say, The Chinese are way smarter and effective in achieving their goals. The Chinese have a long term vision. Something the U.S. because of their political deficiencies and power struggles are not even able of formulating.

    • @dovecat
      @dovecat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That’s one of the benefits of being a dictatorship

    • @freemanol
      @freemanol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Pros and cons. Corruption is definitely harder to tackle in an opaque system. But the rest of us should not blindly think that more democracy is the answer to all problems.

    • @emie6117
      @emie6117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@BristolBerg Inflation actually isn't an issue in Chinese markets right now. At least not comparable to the US, there are no supply chain deficiencies nor the consumer spending to cause over inflation.
      The property market, yes. But the property market's predominant issue is debt, which isn't as concerning as it may seem, as the majority of it is debt denominated in the RMB.

    • @darkchocolate3390
      @darkchocolate3390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      China's long term vision is overrated. Building things just for the sake of building doesn't make you smart. Also having a backwards policy that is going to cut their population in half is also not long term thinking.

    • @teeskcirtap
      @teeskcirtap 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      you're giving them too much credit....CCP military positions are bought, not earned, they can have any vision they want, but when rubber meets the road....

  • @relentless1989
    @relentless1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember what Sigmund Freud said about size 😅

  • @alfonzocecic9070
    @alfonzocecic9070 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelente documental

  • @yu-jd5jg
    @yu-jd5jg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    From recent China's History, especially since 1840 onwards, China was constantly being invaded by outside countries because the Qing Dynasty near to its end was very weak. So-called China's 100 years of shame. When you are poor you will face hunger and when you are weak others will bully you. The last few decades saw China with the efforts of its 1.4B hardworking Chinese under the leadership of the CPC keep moving forward, towards a more prosperous stronger united future. With a modern military well-equipped well-trained well-disciplined ever-ready to defend the beloved Motherland and its people

    • @ajidwork5393
      @ajidwork5393 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      US manufactured weapon of genocide now is smiling ....hahah and investot now dancing...

    • @lilyroseblume167
      @lilyroseblume167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They should shame about
      corona virus and
      the still dictature in our
      alredy 22 century and the same for Putin. VIVA democraci and peace
      all over the gl🌍be🙏
      Dictature come frome narcissistic people. Narcissists are soul helness.

    • @thoughtfull9398
      @thoughtfull9398 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      its enough to be able to defend. russia and china is building to attack. yes attack, look at ukraine, chechnia, syria,

    • @zll9846
      @zll9846 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      History has fully proved that backwardness will be beaten. Strengthening the construction of national defense forces is a solid backing for the party to lead the people in building the motherland.

  • @oceanrem6531
    @oceanrem6531 2 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    I am not quite sure "Taiwan will be China's Vietnam." Remember, During the Vietnam war, military supplies from both China and Soviet Union continued to pour into Vietnam without any interruption. Furthermore, China warned the U.S. (through a third country) that if the U.S. ever cross the 17th parallel, then China would intervened (just like during the Korean War). As a result, the U.S. was fighting a protracted defensive war. Taiwan, unfortunately, is an island. If there is going to be an invasion, Taiwanese are pretty much on their own. Given what is going on in Ukraine, I am not sure the U.S. would intervene militarily (remember sinking one aircraft carrier = roughly 5000 lives). The question for the U.S. is simple: is Taiwan worth World War III? Probably not. The most the U.S. and its allies would do is to impose the most severe economic sanctions against China.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      American whipped the Vietcong's butts and there was nothing China could do about it.

    • @TKDLION
      @TKDLION 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Taiwan makes our computer chips, so I'm not sure that we could afford to let Taiwan fall to China.

    • @drbalbon7332
      @drbalbon7332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Taiwan wouldn't be another Ukraine though. The US can't be forced in most situations but given it has and of itself committed to helping Taiwan it will have no choice but to do the honorable thing in the event that China invades, otherwise the country ceases to be a power really. After the disaster of Afghanistan a gentle approach won't be tolerated.

    • @linustehminus
      @linustehminus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@bighands69 oh? is that why we lost the war?

    • @4Serviceplan
      @4Serviceplan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      China are coward little boys

  • @Nerinav1985
    @Nerinav1985 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Analyze this:
    Six centuries ago, during the Ming dynasty, China was a economic and military superpower.
    Under the leadership of the legendary admiral Zheng He, an armada of giant Chinese ships travelled all over Asia.
    They visited and traded with Arabia, Africa and India - but never colonized them.
    It's not in the Chinese DNA to dominate other nations.
    History is a witness.

  • @user-zu5dv5ki7d
    @user-zu5dv5ki7d ปีที่แล้ว +3

    China's development is peaceful,As long as you don't attack her

    • @user-zu5dv5ki7d
      @user-zu5dv5ki7d ปีที่แล้ว +1

      America's shadow is behind all the wars in the world

    • @usul573
      @usul573 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd like to think so. Though China has territorial disputes with something like 10 countries and the increased military spending and more aggressive rhetoric have a lot of people very nervous.