How the US & China Are Preparing to Fight Total War

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • Get Nebula using my link for 40% off an annual subscription: go.nebula.tv/r...
    Watch part 2 exclusively on Nebula covering the Myanmar Civil War: nebula.tv/vide...
    Please Subscribe: / @reallifelore
    RealLifeLore on Spotify: spoti.fi/47yMfzp
    RealLifeLore on Facebook: / reallifelore
    Select video clips courtesy of Getty Images
    Select video clips courtesy of the AP Archive
    Special thanks to MapTiler / OpenStreetMap Contributors and GEOlayers 3
    www.maptiler.c...
    www.openstreet...
    aescripts.com/...

ความคิดเห็น • 11K

  • @Schadowofmorning
    @Schadowofmorning 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10976

    We've come full circle: once people called aircraft carriers "islands that move" now people call islands "natural aircraft carriers".

    • @LoisoPondohva
      @LoisoPondohva 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +921

      It's kinda weird lol.
      Each time i hear that phrase my brain goes "so... an airbase?"

    • @JasperKlijndijk
      @JasperKlijndijk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +586

      Unsinkable, unmovable aircraft carrier

    • @ExplosiveLandmine
      @ExplosiveLandmine 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +235

      @@JasperKlijndijkuntil it’s nuked

    • @thorgot911
      @thorgot911 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +275

      ​@@JasperKlijndijkoh the US can sink an island, and they have before in the past.

    • @VChong1991
      @VChong1991 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

      ​@@ExplosiveLandmineICBMs can be intercepted. Hypersonic missles could not be intercepted. You have no hypersonic missles 🤭

  • @Bigdog5400
    @Bigdog5400 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3922

    Fun historical fact, one of the main reasons the PLA couldn’t pursue the ROC during their retreat to Taiwan was because the ROC retained greater control over the Chinese Navy. Following the ROC’s retreat, the PLA in China didn’t have a functioning navy, as the ROC had essentially “stolen” it.

    • @TheGodfather4695
      @TheGodfather4695 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

      Mhm that makes sense. Thanks for info.

    • @namantherockstar
      @namantherockstar 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      USA inspires me.. My parents said if i get 70K followers They'd buy me a professional camera for recording..begging u guys , literally
      Begging..

    • @blazing_pyro67
      @blazing_pyro67 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Thanks that's very important information that got left out. I was wondering exactly that so I came to the comments thankfully it was the 1st comment I read. K

    • @jukeboxfandango
      @jukeboxfandango 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +190

      @@namantherockstar - someone's really desperate to get their channel monetized I see

    • @stvdagger8074
      @stvdagger8074 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +106

      There was also the Battle of Hainan. In addition to retreating to Taiwan, about 200,000 RoC troops retreated to the Island of Hainan, which is just East of Vietnam. In 1950, the Communist regime invaded that island, using more than 300 junks to move troops across the strait. Although the RoC ships and aircraft inflicted about 4,000 casualties on the communist troops, as the strait was much more narrower than the one between Taiwan and the mainland, they could not stop the majority of the troops getting ashore. The RoC troops had to evacuate or surrender. While this was successful, Mao and his Generals realized that the wider strait and the likelihood of intervention by the US Navy meant that using an extemporized fleet of junks would probably fail to invade Taiwan.

  • @_monolithic_
    @_monolithic_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4201

    Take a drink every time RLL uses some form of the words "massively," "vastly," or "dramatically." Godspeed.

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +372

      Do I look like a Russian General to you? I’d be dead!

    • @xtremeyoylecake
      @xtremeyoylecake 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

      I’d be in the hospital for my blood alcohol level being too high!

    • @kennethmadsen6474
      @kennethmadsen6474 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

      I don't have that much alcohol at hand

    • @hairyneil
      @hairyneil 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

      @@kennethmadsen6474 me either and I'm a distillery

    • @eriks8382
      @eriks8382 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

      “You see…”

  • @mikebrmike
    @mikebrmike 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Australia's cancelled submarine order with France wasn't for nuclear submarines... It was for diesel electric. Going with AUKUS meant they'd gain nuclear submarine capability

    • @robertamann2093
      @robertamann2093 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      you sir are correct, and you and the rest of us sucker's will pay for this crazy plan.

    • @flavio7180
      @flavio7180 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It was much more about security cooperation. France is one of the few countries that possesses and produces nuclear submarines, just like the US and the UK, but Australia went with the AUKUS agreement since it's much more important for Australian security if tensions with China rise.

    • @mikebrmike
      @mikebrmike 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@flavio7180 France builds them for their own navy but they aren't for sale... Only their conventional submarines are for export

    • @SnowmanTF2
      @SnowmanTF2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Plus the order with France was hardly going smoothly, it kept hitting snags/delays. With costs on path to be more than double the initial bid, might have been closer to three times the bid already but it has been a while since I looked into it.

    • @SilverforceX
      @SilverforceX หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Australia gains nothing. Those are US virginia subs, crewed by mostly US, and under US command. Australia just pays huge amount for protection racket.

  • @rechiecanonigo3800
    @rechiecanonigo3800 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2007

    As a citizen living in the Philippines, this is scary AF but all true. The research to make this video especially the
    Philippine related parts of the video are all extremely accurate.

    • @joeycarmona2317
      @joeycarmona2317 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      Do you think, in your opinion, the fear of war gets worse as the years go by?

    • @rechiecanonigo3800
      @rechiecanonigo3800 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +227

      @@joeycarmona2317 yes it will get worse as China will get more aggressive trying to overthrow Taiwan. Apparently those chips are as valuable as gold and oil combined.

    • @eksbocks9438
      @eksbocks9438 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

      The part that people usually forget is how a war can be dragged on as well. Kind of like the situation in Ukraine.
      My suggestion is make sure your home country has adequate supplies and hardware for the long haul.
      Wishing you guys well over there. The Philippines has always been close friends with our country.
      ✌️🇺🇲🇵🇭

    • @buzz5969
      @buzz5969 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Philippines has been Pro China a long time flip flopping back and forth taking anything from any country they can get for free, except China gives nothing for free and expects paybacks.🇺🇸✌🏻🍻

    • @enzoh7763
      @enzoh7763 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      ​@@eksbocks9438 ,,
      GOOD friends. WOULDN'T put their FRIEND'S In Danger .
      EVER .
      So who is the good friends ?

  • @maonutrition3177
    @maonutrition3177 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1570

    First time seeing the Myanmar civil war being acknowledged as a major piece of the geopolitical chess board in a video. Good job!

    • @DumbestDumbFool
      @DumbestDumbFool 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and I just realized the genocide happening both in rohingya and palestine are the tip of US-China cold war... all these death because China want US to back off and take Taiwan back is... sad... watching this video made me realizes what superpower truly is, how much power they have in other countries, it's scary. And I always find it funny how many people hate americans, but they are the only one keeping both russia and china from invading everything around them, people really need to know politics to appreciate what US has done to keep peace but at the same time instigate all these fear, though I know for sure the "fear mongering" by Russian and Chinese governments are just tools for them to prepare for invasion and still gain the support of their citizens. Huh, writing this comment made me realize another thing huh, fear out of negligence to learn truly is the stupidest part of humans. We all are truly blessed to learn about these wider angle of politics through this channel instead of listening to "higher ups"

    • @thetest8777
      @thetest8777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Same never heard of it until now 😕
      Pretty sure us will seize those gas ship tankers

    • @Gutbomber
      @Gutbomber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well it is wedged at a place between nations and could be used as a port for the Chinese and there is like some Chinese already there.

    • @sbeast64
      @sbeast64 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      There was a genocide, then a military coup, then a civil war, and many crimes against humanity have been committed since. Total mess =(

    • @Gutbomber
      @Gutbomber 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @sbeast64 True, always sort of having been like that. They also came into my mom's country and sacked it when my dad's country was being founded. You also got many cultures there in Burma .

  • @Patriotic_kurd
    @Patriotic_kurd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1294

    Real life lore never fails to scare us 💀

    • @steffanal-towaiji5592
      @steffanal-towaiji5592 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      yea ture

    • @saunaaKarki
      @saunaaKarki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

      Whatever gives them views..

    • @gabrielgyorffy1373
      @gabrielgyorffy1373 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i mean now he doesnt back a few years he never failed to spread misinformation just like kurzgesagt

    • @soundscape26
      @soundscape26 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

      That's what gives him the most views basically.

    • @gabrielgyorffy1373
      @gabrielgyorffy1373 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@soundscape26 that or misinformation

  • @Mikearice1
    @Mikearice1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Stuff like this is why I think TH-cam is better for being informed about world events and geopolitics than watching broadcast or cable TV, at least here in the States.

    • @robichard
      @robichard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Much, much, much better !

    • @chew5461-l7f
      @chew5461-l7f หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      But you can't tell this is a very biased video??

    • @zenferns
      @zenferns หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@chew5461-l7fhow?

    • @justaweeb9086
      @justaweeb9086 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And that kind of mindset will have the blindfold pulled over your eyes again before you realize it. Believe nothing, consider everything

    • @TFNARMY_2009
      @TFNARMY_2009 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@chew5461-l7f I mean if you consider Bias truth, then sure you’re right.

  • @dominiksitarek1448
    @dominiksitarek1448 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +309

    I cant tell you how grateful I am for you keeping background sounds to the bare minimum, so many long from channels render themselves unwatchable/unlistenable for long periods of time due to have obnoxious sound effects for key dates and a very loud background track which does not fit the tone of the topic. Thanks again.

    • @DJ-GASM
      @DJ-GASM 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Cough Infographics

    • @Maas_Grande
      @Maas_Grande 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed. I've tried to politely ask some creators to tone down the music, they continue, and I just can't watch.

    • @neoiskim
      @neoiskim 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The north of the Great Wall is not Chinese territory. It was ruled by Mongols, Manchurians, and Koreans. Qin Shi Huang built the Great Wall to block the so-called Northern Orangkai. Later, China was conquered by the Mongolia and also Kim(金) Dynasty founded by descendants of korean Kim Ham-bo.
      Manjuwonryugo (滿洲源流考), compiled during the Qianlong Emperor of the Qing Dynasty, also reveals that the national name 金(kim) Dynasty is also derived from the family name 金(kim)of King of Silla(ancient korea).
      Also china wad ruled by the Manchurians for 300 years(Qing dynasty)
      Professor Sugihara, who presented "Japan's Bronze Age from Korea", said, "The Bronze Age came to Japan from 100 BC to AD50, the end of the Korean Bronze Age society." In Japan, the Iron Age and the Bronze Age were passed down at the same time during the Yayoi period, and the Bronze Age was used only for ancestral rites, so it seems that it went straight to the Iron Age without going through the Bronze Age."
      Around 100 BC ~ Ancient civilization began in Japan when Koreans landed with iron weapons in Japan, where primitive people lived during the Stone Age. Japanese history is the history of the Korean people.
      Japanese civic group claims, "It is the same as the annexation of Korea and Japan, reunification of East and West Germany." 2018-11-2008:30 A report was sent to the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in Korea to demand "correct the fabrication of facts in Korea." // Japanese Yayoi are Koreans.. Chinese = Vietnamese gene... Korean Japanese = Siberian gene. "Our direct ancestors are members of the ancient Asian and Tungus ethnic group that migrated from Siberia in the Neolithic Age, and linguistically belong to the Altai ethnic group." "In addition to the Yayoi (Yamato people) of the Doraein line who crossed from the Korean Peninsula, there are also the Ainu lineal descendants of the Jomon people of the indigenous people of the Japanese archipelago."

    • @GottaBeAHero
      @GottaBeAHero 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Knowing which sounds, when to use them, and at what volume is a surprisingly rare talent I'm starting to notice. I Guess not everyone can be Redban lol

    • @somponesakdy826
      @somponesakdy826 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@neoiskimChina CCP haven’t realized that they are stuck with their greatness four thousand years history will not bring them a peace of mind. They should deal with goods or problems with friends and foes in current times. Otherwise they will kill the golden goose (USA) like they are doing right now. Thirty years they were using US DOLLARS TO DEVELOP their country and Army, because their ambition to be great empire (Mongol) they rush to kill their golden egg goose.

  • @thegruffalo5383
    @thegruffalo5383 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +749

    Note: Tindal isn’t being built from scratch. It already is (arguably) the most important and largest fighter base in Australia. The US is facilitating MAJOR base upgrades to support the stated B-52s and other visiting aircraft for joint exercises such as Pitch Black and Talisman Sabre. It’s pretty nifty ngl

    • @StevenCampbell1955
      @StevenCampbell1955 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Tindal is a mere speck on the world war platform. It needs to be ungraded immediately with an expansion suitable to its importance to the new geopolitical situation. Australian military forces have always been focused on defending Tasmania or possibly that big red rock in the middle, but has never been placed in an area where those military forces could project or defend Australia. A time for conscription is near and well past time that the present forces are paid a decent wage reflecting their specialities, their commitment and to attract new enlistments .What other big corporation has such poor conditions for their employees? In Australia, any young person can go to the big mines or big engineering companies to earn three times the wages for much less commitment.

    • @noahway13
      @noahway13 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      As an American, and like most Americans, I see Australia as our biggest ally in the world. We are siblings, from mother England. Australians seem very similar in spirit. We'll bend over backwards to help people, but once you cross a certain line... watch out. And Australia has stood shoulder to shoulder with us in *every* war and conflict and skirmish since World War II. Even in Mogadishu. No one else can make that claim. We are blood brothers.

    • @youandme666100
      @youandme666100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      as an australian i’m actually ashamed of our government and there level of ass kissing towards the american government, i will never fight in a war for those fools and to be honest after the australian government’s treatment of it’s citizens over the last 3-5 years i’ll be surprised if anyone here wants to stand up and defend australia on the front line of any war 😂…
      australian IS NOT the lucky country any more - it’s basically china, let’s not forget how the people of melbourne were treated during lock downs, let’s also not forget the lies our government have feed us over the last few years and how citizens had their human rights taken from them for not submitting to the “science” of what they pushed…
      the australian people are well aware of the bullshit spewing from our governments and i wouldn’t be surprised if they tried forcing a draft and found that half the draftees point there weapons at there own leaders before they do the enemy 🙏🏻

    • @Numinus1
      @Numinus1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@noahway13shouldn't England also be your biggest ally then? Just wondering

    • @_Da_Bois
      @_Da_Bois 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@Numinus1US and Australia were both colonies of the UK so I think that’s where the brotherly ally phrase came from.

  • @WinterSkyyy
    @WinterSkyyy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +384

    At about 30 mins in, you referred to the Australia -France submarine deal as "nuclear." It wasnt, it was for Australia to buy French diesel-electric submarines:)

    • @mktj1
      @mktj1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      I caught that too. RLL sloppy.

    • @ShinyWasTakenTwice
      @ShinyWasTakenTwice 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

      @@mktj1 Pretty much everybody is sloppy when it comes to global politics that include Australia for some reason

    • @AgitatedTaco
      @AgitatedTaco 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Imagine watching a real life lore video in the 1930s 😳

    • @JV-lq3tx
      @JV-lq3tx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Though Australia's conventional sub was based on the France's Barracuda class which is nuclear.

    • @djanitatiana
      @djanitatiana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      It wasn't quite as controversial as certain media portray. Lefties winged a little but in general Australia knows the problems we've had with Chinese aggression could get a lot worse.

  • @Fede-z7d
    @Fede-z7d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    It’s crazy the amount of free high quality videos, this channel it’s at my top along with science channels like Vsuace & Veritasium

    • @kaizenyasou6963
      @kaizenyasou6963 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yep

    • @ScootsMcPoot
      @ScootsMcPoot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is all bs do not believe half of these channels. It's all propaganda

    • @robertamann2093
      @robertamann2093 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      not free our taxpayer dollars pay for this CIA sponsored NGO, and others like it. you are listening to AI voice and content, pretty slick but fake none the less genius 😅

    • @danielrittscher456
      @danielrittscher456 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simon whistler has some great stuff as well

  • @johannvonbabylon
    @johannvonbabylon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1484

    I'm a big fan of your work RLL but I gotta say, your geopolitics videos are the biggest factor in me turning into a doomer.

    • @weepo2651
      @weepo2651 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      I mean he is friends with second thought which is just the worse

    • @SacredCASHcow
      @SacredCASHcow 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      ​@@supervegito2277all it takes is one or two idiots like putin to cause all this chaos

    • @JKroning
      @JKroning 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      @@supervegito2277 A single major actor in a WWIII scenario has more conventional explosive power than all of the forces in WWII combined, I woudn't count on us surviving this Big One.

    • @miggybowman85
      @miggybowman85 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@spankpaddle8972 he’s covering what’s going on currently. You gotta cover the good times, and the bad times unfortunate as it is

    • @OiiRobbi3x
      @OiiRobbi3x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Lol try Whatifalthist he will make you implode like a black hole of doom.

  • @justinholt7059
    @justinholt7059 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +439

    I would like to point out that he mentioned that China had the largest navy in terms of "surface" vessels but the US still has pretty much 10x the tonnage of the chinese

    • @NachoBrochacho.
      @NachoBrochacho. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      and Missiles

    • @christopherg7483
      @christopherg7483 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      came here to say this myself

    • @2shay550
      @2shay550 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

      I think the Chinese count inflatable rafts as surface vessels 😅

    • @garrettwilson3032
      @garrettwilson3032 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      @@2shay550 Yeah, and they put toy aircraft carriers in the harbor to say that they have more of those too

    • @eftheusempire
      @eftheusempire 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Number of vessels and tonnage is irrelevant compared to what weapons and defense systems they are carrying. Looking at the wrong data broham

  • @NinjagoGuy416
    @NinjagoGuy416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +159

    I KNEW he would tie in the latest Modern Conflicts episode to this one! I’m such a big fan of those documentaries, it’s literally the only reason I’m subscribed to Nebula. I would highly recommend the episode about Russia’s war with Chechnya; it’s one of my favorites 😊

    • @andreykov
      @andreykov 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      В Чечне действовала Алькаида и это привело к боевым действиям. Точно так же, как 11 сентября Алькаида совершила теракт, который допустили спецслужбы, наблюдавшие за этими террористами. Это был повод начать войну. Изначально Алькаида была создана американскими спецслужбами для контроля территорий и для противостояния СССР. Здесь вам этого не расскажут.

    • @liudmylab2328
      @liudmylab2328 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Чеченцы знают, что 300 тысяч чеченцев на их территории убила российская армия, которая туда вторглась
      People of Chechnya know that 300 000 of their sityzens where killed by russian army that invaded

    • @RisingInTheFlesh
      @RisingInTheFlesh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@andreykovyeah, it's no secret that the West has funded terror groups to deter USSR. It's just harder to find info on it

    • @Luluios
      @Luluios 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andreykov.

  • @tankeater
    @tankeater หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    16:08 I'm an ARMY Combat Infantry Veteran that was a Mortarman. Having those 3 guns so close together, sent shivers down my spine!!! TRAIN LIKE YOU FIGHT! 1 well placed round, will leave a crater in that entire area from all their rounds exploring.

    • @yuansizhu6271
      @yuansizhu6271 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We see 3 teams of them as 3 units. However maybe the higher leader sees them together as 1 unit... I don't know.

    • @tankeater
      @tankeater หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yuansizhu6271 in the ARMY it's 4 guns, 2nd gun is your Base Gun and FDC is your comms and Fire Direction Comtrol, known as a Mtr Platoon with up to 24 men in the Platoon. It's a specialty unit.

  • @nicholas_pumper_art
    @nicholas_pumper_art 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +533

    US military terminology: "deployed" implies impermanent presence, which could be work trips and so on. I think the word you are looking for as far as US presence in SK and Japan is "stationed", which is a large majority of those numbers you mention. These are troops, and their families, who have picked up their belongings and moved there on a "permanent" basis, with the expectation to move out after 2-6 years.
    Meanwhile we have troops "deployed" in eastern Europe, as we have not STATIONED them as in moved all their belongings, but rather packed up a bag and flown them there for a few weeks or months.

    • @MylesKillis
      @MylesKillis 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Seeing as he also says stationed at times id say he meant what he said. Especially since the people who are in those areas aren't on American soil. So its considered being deployed.

    • @laughingseal2282
      @laughingseal2282 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nationalist citizens of these countries see it as an occupation.

    • @firemantimmy5367
      @firemantimmy5367 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      In the navy, we refer to our ships stationed in Japan as “FDNF-J” which means Forward-Deployed Naval Forces, Japan. They’re near interchangeable.

    • @agps4418
      @agps4418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Now you know. that's just what this guy said. Take his videos with grains of salt.
      i'm an indonesian, and i still can't get over how stupid his video about java island was. it was inaccurate and misleading

    • @sullathehutt7720
      @sullathehutt7720 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@MylesKillis
      No.
      Okinawa, South Korea, Italy, etc is a duty station. The HQ of the MEF or equivalent force is there. You're in a training cycle, not a deployment cycle. It doesn't matter if you're "not on American soil."
      A deployment is to like Afghanistan or Kosovo. You are conducting forward operations there. Not just training. You are in harm's way in a totally different posture.

  • @adammistretta5442
    @adammistretta5442 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +389

    Minor correction at 8:20. China has 3 aircraft carriers, but only “designed and built” one of them, the Fujian. Of the other 2, one (Liaoning) was 60-70 percent built in Ukraine for the Soviet Navy and then sold to China to be completed for the PLAN and the other (Shandong) was built entirely in China but still based on the Soviet design. Just nitpicking for accuracy’s sake

    • @joshwilliams8863
      @joshwilliams8863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Came to the comments to say the same thing.

    • @miyojewoltsnasonth2159
      @miyojewoltsnasonth2159 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      *@adammistretta5442* I appreciate nitpicking for the sake of accuracy. Thank you.
      *Reply to:* _"Minor correction at __8:20__. China has 3 aircraft carriers, but only “designed and built” one of them, the Fujian. Of the other 2, one (Liaoning) was 60-70 percent built in Ukraine for the Soviet Navy and then sold to China to be completed for the PLAN and the other (Shandong) was built entirely in China but still based on the Soviet design. Just nitpicking for accuracy’s sake"_

    • @KevinEnjoyer
      @KevinEnjoyer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Aye. Although this is a hilarious flex, China saying the Liaoning is combat ready. Remember, this ship is the same as the Kuznetsov, which is a floating laughingstock of a CV that can't even move by itself.

    • @fakedthunder
      @fakedthunder 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@KevinEnjoyerbut that’s mostly russias own fault because they can’t do maintenance for shit, India also has a carrier of that very same model and they operate it without issue

    • @MrDibara
      @MrDibara 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@fakedthunder _Seriously... _*_WHAT THE FUCK went wrong with the Admiral Kuznetsov?_* 😑
      China and India be here making Russia look like amateurs! What, did Russia start thinking aircraft carriers are not worth it?

  • @kingcobra2608
    @kingcobra2608 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +219

    The submarine deal between France and Australia was not for nuclear powered submarine, but for conventional powered submarines.

    • @jordanrussell345
      @jordanrussell345 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So France was wanting to sell their leftover junk to Australia and Australia backed out for a better deal? Poor France.

    • @alexross26
      @alexross26 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      nobody wants conventional anymore. too limited and high maintenance. The reactors on nuclear subs are incredibly safe (at least now) and come with incredible benefits such as logistics and longevity.

    • @Zack-fu4lo
      @Zack-fu4lo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@alexross26 the problem was that france offered australia nuclear. australia was the one that insisted on having it be conventional. probably the australian gov at the times fault

    • @dragginmedown
      @dragginmedown 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zack-fu4loyeah our government are pussies for anything nuclear

    • @KlausBahnhof
      @KlausBahnhof 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@alexross26 Those nuclear submarines are a colossal waste of money and will be effectively under US control. They're intended to patrol the South China Sea, not to defend Australia's coastline. Paul Keating was correct in his criticisms.

  • @Timothy.365
    @Timothy.365 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    What an outstanding presentation! Well researched, excellent visuals, absolutely first class story telling. You make 50 minutes go by in a flash! The complexity of geopolitics is hard enough to understand, but your channel makes any university professor envious! Bravo 👏

  • @tomw4643
    @tomw4643 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +304

    A good report - - -In fact, as a former strategic planning analyst, I find it fascinating that our media technology and information access has progressed to the point of providing an hour-long detailed accounting of the US forces, deployment, capabilities, locations, weapon systems and likely combat tactics in such detail prior to a possible engagement with our potential future enemy. In WWI and even in the Cold War, people were shot or imprisoned for revealing such information at this level of detail. It can be argued that this is simply an elaborate warning sign in the best traditions of the MAD Doctrine but it might be equally valid for China (PRC) to interpret all this as details of the US offensive capabilities for a first-strike invasion of PRC. This latter interpretation is one that Russia has believed for most of the last 75 years.

    • @clarkd1955
      @clarkd1955 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Was there any information here that reasonably wouldn’t be known by the CCP? I think not.

    • @tinthaung7118
      @tinthaung7118 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Just an AI bot. Come on.🤪

    • @tonyfiling-h8b
      @tonyfiling-h8b 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I agree too. People that put this stuff out, sound the alarm for what we could possibly do. Whoever put this on here, way to go buddy. Think China cared more for this than the intended audience.

    • @IvanJohnson-w2k
      @IvanJohnson-w2k 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      ​@@kw1178everything in this video is obviously known by Chinese intelligence already. You think the MSS is stupid

    • @hyua6841
      @hyua6841 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You think China doesn't already know all this?@@tonyfiling-h8b

  • @frankdasnake
    @frankdasnake 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Dude you are a fucking tank. Just casually dropping another gripping, hour-long film with excellent and consistent production quality. Respect...

  • @josephallsen3135
    @josephallsen3135 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    I have to give major props to the creators of this. You were very clear in the points you made. You did not talk down to your audience while not being overly technical. Your premises were clear. You spent what I feel is about the correct amount of time on explaining the supporting evidence while not getting sidetracked into informational rabbit holes. I was able to follow your thesis and if I want to question your premises; they are presented very clearly so that I could very easily research them myself.
    You communicated your points with the right amount of clarity and were engaging without patronizing or boring the audience.
    Setting aside the politics of the topic; from a communication and writing perspective this is a standard that a lot could be learned from. BRAVO! A+ 100 out of 100.

    • @DrDoGood
      @DrDoGood 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No one gets 100% in my class. Nope, not happening.

  • @KatrinaRussell
    @KatrinaRussell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Wow, what a most excellent production.
    Will definitely follow on nebula.

  • @NATUREN3ST
    @NATUREN3ST 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +177

    I am concerned that Guam will have too many US bases and tip over, and capsize.

    • @Artyomi
      @Artyomi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      We need to inform the pentagon of your findings immediately, and just in case pull out all bases and troops from Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Okinawa, Diego Garcia, and all the other islands used as “natural aircraft carriers”

    • @MrPlainsflyer
      @MrPlainsflyer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Now that would be funny😂

    • @zachplaysallday-zpad5731
      @zachplaysallday-zpad5731 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ayo??

    • @jesseguerra4131
      @jesseguerra4131 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      didn’t a georgian politician say that?

    • @MrPlainsflyer
      @MrPlainsflyer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @jesseguerra4131 yes, lol, though I don't know if he was joking or just mentally impaired

  • @dsmichael8080
    @dsmichael8080 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I'm Singaporean and I really doubt Singapore will want to play any part in an offensive against China. Singapore has very close ties to China and would not risk angering China. However, it is true that we do cooperate with the US to a certain extent.

    • @aredtomato8957
      @aredtomato8957 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I believe ASEAN is smart enough to not get themselves involved in other people's internal affairs. Lol. It's obvious the US is the root cause of all problems we have today. Take a look at how the west blocks UN aid to Gaza people. Then saying how they care for Muslim in China LOL 😂😂😂

    • @BacaiRob
      @BacaiRob 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      政府是政府,美军在那里,谁能阻止?李显龙能指挥在新加坡的美军?

    • @shanerooney7288
      @shanerooney7288 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      To be an enemy of the US is dangerous,
      but to be a friend is fatal.

    • @robmiller1808
      @robmiller1808 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@shanerooney7288 BS.

    • @strayedarticle2838
      @strayedarticle2838 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@shanerooney7288China is the #1 trading partner of the US, and loaned them several trillion for all those wars in the middle east. That doesn't stop the US from surrounding China with 400 military bases and instigating conflicts with them.

  • @aib42
    @aib42 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    @RealLiftLore FYI, Small mistake at 30:28, you state “Prior Nuclear Submarine deal they had made with France” in reference to the canceled Australian deal to purchase French submarines. The Australian submarine deal with France was for conventional Diesel Submarines, not nuclear powered submarines.

    • @markallen6433
      @markallen6433 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Super important point, it was the lack of nuclear power that made the French deal worthless for the Aussie fleet needs, which were essentially generated by Chinese posturing and aggression, and caused them to reconsider, as well as the fact that the US and UK chose to release very important sub tech to the Aussies in an effort to button up the pacific. This would have never happened without the Chinese belligerence of the last decade, but here we are.

    • @markallen6433
      @markallen6433 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DK-ei4ed no. Read the other comments in this thread.

    • @DeanOlsen-s4k
      @DeanOlsen-s4k 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they are now going to buy u.s nuclear subs

  • @mariam-bk510
    @mariam-bk510 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really like the way ReaLifeLore always provides informative, objective and convincing analysis without any political bias. From the beginning to the end, he only tried to analyse the reasons and intentions behind each move by the US and China, without concluding who is right or wrong, unlike other channels which insert a lot of personal political opinions into their stories.

  • @jessbakica5233
    @jessbakica5233 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    I knew you where planning something big when an episode didn’t come out last week, love these big episodes ❤

  • @Titanium_Cranium
    @Titanium_Cranium 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +356

    Greetings from Scotland. I've been loving this channel so much since I found it a few months ago. The production quality and clear explanations of complex political situations are amazing. You also manage to make what can be quite dry subjects seem very exciting in a way I haven't encountered before.
    I feel like Neo after his first download except instead of kung foo I'm like:
    "I know geopolitics!"
    Thanks for all your hard work producing such high quality content.

    • @GanLinLiang
      @GanLinLiang 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Actually, Scotland and England have always been two countries. But China's civil war never ended.

    • @Titanium_Cranium
      @Titanium_Cranium 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@GanLinLiangWhat has my country's relationship with it's Southern neighbour got to do with my comment about this channel? I'm well aware of our own history.

    • @BajsgBsjsj
      @BajsgBsjsj 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because of Americans@@GanLinLiang

    • @rongyaowang1075
      @rongyaowang1075 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are such a shameless villain! Deliberate slander and slander! Where is your conscience? People like you have no bottom line! You are as shameless as the blogger! Slander China? Will you make progress yourself? What is your purpose? You know best!

    • @bigdogg9644
      @bigdogg9644 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely

  • @mr.bennett108
    @mr.bennett108 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

    I love these videos because they're essentially that kid in world history class who wrote a presentation so bomb even the jocks were silently enthralled. 10/10

    • @c.d.j300
      @c.d.j300 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I'd be the class clown the nerd inspired to take history class seriously enough to ace it... (Commenting from experience).

    • @agps4418
      @agps4418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Take his videos with grains of salt.
      i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading.

    • @Azuria969
      @Azuria969 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nice try 无毛 ccp pawn, you wont get your salary today

    • @DarrellWilkerson4.6
      @DarrellWilkerson4.6 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@agps4418hes often wrong 😂 hes got a strong bias and his research is questionable at times.

    • @dopaminedreams1122
      @dopaminedreams1122 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@agps4418 eh, everyone has different perspectives and sources, your idea of bias or untrue may not line up with someone elses, doesnt mean he doesnt research his videos and otherwise present largely accurate information

  • @rrutter81
    @rrutter81 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    One of your best videos. (commenting for the algorithm)

  • @krishnatripathi9576
    @krishnatripathi9576 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +187

    The Research is so much yet so true. It easily explains why it takes him time to make videos with good quality. Respect.

    • @agps4418
      @agps4418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Take his videos with grains of salt.
      i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading.

    • @Chris.in.taiwan
      @Chris.in.taiwan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Fun fact: among other projects the US funded the east - west Powerline construction, which includes a high voltage powerline going across over 3000 meter or 10.000 feet high mountainous terrain. The hike through the area is very unforgiving. Can't imagine how difficult it must have been to build that infrastructure.

    • @gyapa
      @gyapa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you just have an opinion and your own biases just like the video creator. Saying "trust me bro I'm Indonesian" means nothing. @@agps4418

    • @vioo-qn6nw
      @vioo-qn6nw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      USA regime propaganda nothing else, bro. Brian Berletic does much more accurate job of explaining what is actually going on

  • @1lyxbollyvykn714
    @1lyxbollyvykn714 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    me, living in latin america, a region ignored from global stage, without any voice or significant alliance outside of the continent, I am quite happy to live here because if both sides choose to start a war, we'll be ignored by every other superpower, we never had anything to lose from the beginning, why matter now

    • @sandrinowitschM
      @sandrinowitschM 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Hey uhm... So are you guys still willing to take in a few German war refugees? Asking for a Freund.

    • @mikami5799
      @mikami5799 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      clearly you don’t know that there were fleets of Chinese fishing boat fishing in latin American water...

    • @Cincy32
      @Cincy32 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China has been arming indigenous rebel groups in southern Chile.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are being exploiting by US cooperates in daily basis, latin america is natural resource rich but economy weak, due to its “american backyard”status.

    • @jaehongsong4904
      @jaehongsong4904 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh, yes it will matter. USA and China colliding will mean the end of our modern economy. Rich countries will survive, but majority of poor countries will go bankrupt

  • @AgitatedTaco
    @AgitatedTaco 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Imagine watching a real life lore video in the 1930s 😳

    • @krisshaw9464
      @krisshaw9464 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I would be like ahhhhhhhĥĥhĥhĥhĥĥĥ this is gonna suck u gotta be kidding me I can't believe all this is really gonna happen I must know more to the time machine quickly I must know more

    • @graceneilitz7661
      @graceneilitz7661 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well… then you would already know that war was coming and you wouldn’t have to worry about world ending nuclear weapons.
      Nukes because a thing in 1945, with the second and third nukes ever created being used in war.

    • @M78ccc
      @M78ccc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@graceneilitz7661 It is ridiculous that these nuclear weapons were used in Japan. Americans killed 200000 Japanese people with nuclear weapons, but now they want to use Japan to confront China and let the Japanese continue to sacrifice their lives for the United States

  • @ravenouself4181
    @ravenouself4181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Context: The ROC, with support from the USA, came up with the "11-dash line". The 9-dash line is a reduced area. Interestingly, the PRC and ROC are not the only ones with absurd and overlapping claims in the South China Sea.

  • @jaylewis1383
    @jaylewis1383 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

    Just a footnote: B-52s are designed to carry nuclear bombs, but they also are very good at laying sea mines. The US has upgraded its nautical mines, and a B-52 unit did a concept test off Hawaii earlier this year. Look where RAAF Tindal is, and at the sea lanes where the Chinese move their oil supplies. The B-52s can do a lot of damage without escalating to a nuclear exchange.

    • @nanbutinanquibotiqui
      @nanbutinanquibotiqui 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Chinese can also do a lot of damage to the B52s. America's aircraft carriers (today's dinosaurs) are sitting ducks for China's DF carrier killer hypersonic missiles. Don't think that the US military is invincible. Just remember the Titanic. And the US just lost the Afghanistan war and will soon lose the Ukraine war as was widely reported. The US fled Vietnam without winning the war in 1975. It was forced to a truce in the Korean war after the Chinese army pushed the US military out of North Korea. Don't think that the US military is superior - not at all. The US is good at talking big and bullying other countries.

    • @cooper1819
      @cooper1819 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The sea lanes are also use by Japan & Korea, and also commercial ships that move goods to South East Asia and beyond. Anyway, for oil, could easily come from Central Asia & Russia, via land & deserts right? BTW, these days nuclear bombs are carried by intercontinental ballistic missile and supersonic missiles, not planes.

    • @mobiusflammel9372
      @mobiusflammel9372 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cooper1819We are eyeing mod 13 for the B61, meant to be carried by the Raider. At the very least the US likes to keep the option of being able to drop nukes from planes if it needs to, even if it’s not the most likely method of delivery.

    • @michaelj.jordan1732
      @michaelj.jordan1732 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Soft, try us😂

    • @danielcalvo4635
      @danielcalvo4635 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol poor men you believe everything they tell you 😂
      Look question: is it possible that Russia provides China w all the resources they via inland transport!?!? Russia has petrol and anything you want basically...

  • @SithAssassin
    @SithAssassin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +209

    I want to thank you for the amazing amount of effort that goes into these videos

    • @chuckb1448
      @chuckb1448 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I agree, I just wish he talked a second slower lol, he's pouring out info super fast

    • @vioo-qn6nw
      @vioo-qn6nw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA regime propaganda nothing else. Brian Berletic does much more accurate job of explaining what is actually going on

    • @MichaelBrown-wx6zq
      @MichaelBrown-wx6zq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Idk we've gotten this same content like 4 times now.

    • @thesincitymama
      @thesincitymama 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@chuckb1448 I agree - I changed the playback speed in the video settings to 0.75 (did you know we can do that?)

    • @chuckb1448
      @chuckb1448 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@thesincitymama nope, I didn't know that

  • @mithrigar
    @mithrigar 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Prior submarine agreement with France was for diesel submarines, not nuclear

  • @CollectiveWest1
    @CollectiveWest1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very informative but one minor correction - the French submarine deal with Australia was non-nuclear i.e. diesel-powered submarine technology. In the vast spaces of the Pacific, nuclear-powered submarines are likely to be more useful.

  • @justinolive6171
    @justinolive6171 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +256

    Minor correction: the French submarine contract before the AUKUS deal was for diesel-electric submarines, not for nuclear-powered subs. That's partly why China had some justification for flipping out and threatening that Aus is now a nuclear target

    • @SuperFranzs
      @SuperFranzs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why did you have to remind me of that one court hearing with the World's stupidest woman.

    • @leihtory7423
      @leihtory7423 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      nah france offered their nuclear submarines.
      australia rejected. australia told france to design and build a diesel electric sub.
      france spent billions of dollars converting their nuke subs to diesel electric. build new tool machines & facilities to construct what aus wanted.
      then australia changed its mind again and wants nuclear submarines.
      now usas-australia-uk submarine deal involves having to pay france for their money spent on diesel sub design.

    • @Sparks00psn
      @Sparks00psn 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      Nuclear means nuclear powered by a reactor, not that they launch nukes.

    • @Spaceshps
      @Spaceshps 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, Why purchasing an inferior products from a country losing 3 major wars + 30 other minor wars with the British empire.
      Australia has a right to go for Supreme product from USA!

    • @Partyrockers540
      @Partyrockers540 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let’s face it if a war between the us and china it would be one of the worse wars in history

  • @mothjoke
    @mothjoke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Your work never ceases to amaze me. Great job

  • @lifetimevic
    @lifetimevic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Correction. The Australian/ France deal was for non nuclear submarines.

    • @squa_81
      @squa_81 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was very funny seeing memes in france about submarines on sale on leboncoin (french ebay) for seemingly no reason

    • @stevecariggillio4139
      @stevecariggillio4139 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Nuclear powered* not armed.

    • @lifetimevic
      @lifetimevic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@stevecariggillio4139 nope. The French deal was for diesel submarines. That got torn up when aukus deal was signed fobbing Australia nuclear powered subs. The video said the French were giving us nuclear powered subs and they were giving us diesel powered subs.

    • @1mol831
      @1mol831 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lifetimevicwhy does Australia need submarines though. Australia doesn’t have geopolitical rivals unless they want to create rivals. It’s in one of the most friendly neighbours.

    • @abdiganiaden
      @abdiganiaden 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1mol831 they are obviously a giant island, they want to protect all that resources they stole from natives.

  • @luck4Is
    @luck4Is 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I've been watching RealLifeLore videos since 2018, but never before I felt so attached to it until the end.
    Great job, even though it has 1-hour length I simply couldn't stop watching it.

  • @FacterinoCommenterino
    @FacterinoCommenterino 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Today's Fact: The world's largest video game collection is owned by a man in Texas and contains over 20,000 games.

    • @Yengozi
      @Yengozi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Give a fact about me

    • @JohnIsaacXIV
      @JohnIsaacXIV 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@YengoziYou like anime? That’s a fact?

    • @shadowsapphire100183
      @shadowsapphire100183 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Another fun fact: cats are proof the world is round. If it were flat, they would have knocked everything off by now.

    • @shaanhussain9660
      @shaanhussain9660 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shadowsapphire100183HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHQHA no

    • @shadowsapphire100183
      @shadowsapphire100183 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @shaanhussain9660 well, I suppose you could say the world is flat in a sense. I don't believe the oceans are carbonated like soda after all.

  • @KurtisC93
    @KurtisC93 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +298

    This video is highly detailed with regards to the multi-pronged defense/deterrence strategy currently being implemented by the United States in the West Pacific. What isn't mentioned by RLL, but is also very important, is the increased military cooperation between the US and a few other countries of strategic significance, specifically India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam. That's in addition to Thailand, another longtime American ally that directly borders Myanmar and has coastlines on both the Pacific and Indian Oceans. If the Tatmadaw remains in control of Myanmar and helps China to circumvent their Achilles heel in the Malacca Strait, the US _could_ use its relations with Bangladesh, Thailand, and potentially India to navally blockade Burmese ports in the Bengal Bay, thereby eliminating a major alternate route for Chinese energy imports.

    • @josejf2089
      @josejf2089 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Russia is a big country in energy and food, so

    • @user-rh7wk9dj9b
      @user-rh7wk9dj9b 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Blockade China with what? Hollywood movies?

    • @GolemRising
      @GolemRising 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@josejf2089 The infrastructure to move it does not currently exist, and would take years to build. Also, Russia is currently loosing its own war and does not have much in the way of extra oil or food to send elsewhere.

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@user-rh7wk9dj9bBy stopping ships away from the mainland from accessesing Chinese ports.
      With the help of various countries of course.
      You see that is where China dropped the ball. Their aggressive antics has made countries decide that as bad as the US is? They aren't nearly as bad as a world with the CCP.
      If Xi wasn't such a power hungry control freak, and took pages from Deng who was an amazing leader? China would be well on their way to being the dominate country economically, militarily, and geopoliticaly..

    • @1mol831
      @1mol831 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      If China doesn’t act what excuse would USA do to continue? USA does have time frame limitations, China is probably waiting until US gets tired of staying in the area and doing nothing and eventually another president comes up and focuses on other things. So either USA strikes first, which the other countries would probably stay neutral as they really have nothing to gain by adding their country to the conflict, or China can wait until USA disengages.
      Or USA can block the strait, though it would harm everyone’s interest

  • @89Ayten
    @89Ayten 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Imagine if China was building all of these military installations in Mexico, and in South America. I'm sure the United States would handle it well.

    • @nightruler666
      @nightruler666 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Ask germany how well the zimmermann telegram worked out

    • @EMR2023
      @EMR2023 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They should of done something the minute it happened if they didn’t like that but they didn’t have the balls to. If China did that now in Mexico it’d be a war they loose.

    • @EMR2023
      @EMR2023 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lose*

    • @tinthaung7118
      @tinthaung7118 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That’s one goal China aims for too. Hopefully USA won’t overlook that threat. Mexico cartel is Chinese ally.

    • @wyatt95929
      @wyatt95929 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Maybe China should be nicer to its neighbors and it wouldn't be an issue lol. America has great relations with Mexico and Canada for a reason.

  • @davidsosa9455
    @davidsosa9455 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Excellent work, congratulations.

  • @tawnkramer
    @tawnkramer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +135

    Appreciate all your work to layout this information so beautifully and clearly. It’s amazing how little time our mainstream media spends on issues this important. Silently we are positioning for a global conflict that could claim many of our sons and daughters.

    • @ThatWolfArrow
      @ThatWolfArrow 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's the ww1 alliance daisy chain all over again.

    • @josephlynch7655
      @josephlynch7655 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The media spends a lot of time covering this subject. I see it all the time

    • @Sharer01
      @Sharer01 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      没戏,你们没钱也没制造业

    • @tawnkramer
      @tawnkramer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sharer01 I’m sorry. Google translate isn’t doing a good job on translating your text. I hope that it says you value your sons and daughters too. Because I know you do. Let’s choose option A, peace.

    • @AL-lh2ht
      @AL-lh2ht 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet this guy say china attacks all of US Asian assets somehow forgot that means china attacks like a dozen countries. Literally that means japan, Philippines, South Korea, Australia, and every nations they defense agreements with, would forced to declare war with China.
      You think japan being bombed and they would do nothing? Come on.

  • @markday092009
    @markday092009 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +130

    Sir, you are doing so much good for putting out information like this. Your videos are absolutely amazing. Thank you for your work and dedication!

    • @vioo-qn6nw
      @vioo-qn6nw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA regime propaganda nothing else. Brian Berletic does much more accurate job of explaining what is actually going on

  • @WhoTookRoKam
    @WhoTookRoKam 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I think of everything I’ve learned from this video the one that stands out the most is: The US is literally everywhere

  • @digitalnomad5643
    @digitalnomad5643 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brilliant presentation. Finally, someone giving a truthful account of the history of the RoC and the PRC, instead of dishing out one-sided propaganda.

  • @fencserx9423
    @fencserx9423 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    The problem with the provocation argument is that china is very likely not ready yet. They likely need at least 5 years before they have the capabilities to be capable of overcoming the western response as it stands right now. Basically the bet is that moving now is a loss, and we’re preparing to ensure that moving later is still a loss

    • @MUISHAGGY572
      @MUISHAGGY572 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Yeah but BRICS is more than ready and the US wouldn't want to go against that.

    • @arnold3768
      @arnold3768 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Being an aggressor can present quite a dilemma huh :D
      "To invade or not to invade - that is the question" - CCP

    • @kampfer91
      @kampfer91 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No , the last thing you would wanna do is underestimate the enemy , China is ready but they choose not to act yet . We all make fun of Chinese military hardware just to stroke ours ego of western military stronk but with how technology advance , how China keep building up military force while USA and her western allies only care how to add more women to the army while keep burning theirs money on pointless conflicts . A real commander will always be ready for the worst ....

    • @dylanbh1
      @dylanbh1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

      @@MUISHAGGY572lmao yea everyone fears world renowned super power South Africa 🤣🤣

    • @erwina4738
      @erwina4738 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MUISHAGGY572 Brics is economic partnership so doesnt matter. If anything India would side with US and fight China. Brazil would do nothing and Russia is a joke. Even if all of Brics went to war with US you get US allies are much more powerful than Brics aside from China.

  • @nikos.1644
    @nikos.1644 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The amount of information presented in such a high quality way essentially for free is unbelievable.
    How much research must have gone into this?!

    • @remyphilly5168
      @remyphilly5168 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lots bud. Lots

    • @rdsc.455
      @rdsc.455 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Propaganda is always distributed and force fed into the minds of masses FREE. Both sides are hell bent upon to unleash .

    • @toasty4000000
      @toasty4000000 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Information and all the relevant videos and infographics, across an hour long video? It's crazy, crazy good

  • @karenedonald
    @karenedonald 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    well done, great info. i am a Brit , 20 years in Indonesia

  • @kosjeyr
    @kosjeyr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    When I was in the USAF, I was at Kadena. Also known as the halfway point between Taiwan and Tokyo. You said the main Wing of Kadena but there's a 2nd which I was at. The 353d SOW. It was the 353d SOG when I was there. Has a history going back to WWII as the 3rd Air Commando Group.

  • @gallaghergibson8024
    @gallaghergibson8024 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Small correction: the Franco-Australian submarine deal was not for nuclear submarines. It was for diesel submarines. Which explains the strategic reasoning behind breaking the agreement with the French: what they're getting from AUKUS is way more effective.

  • @TANCHENGYAN-i6p
    @TANCHENGYAN-i6p 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    completely amazing..presentation, graphics ...everything!!.

  • @eurtunwagens2359
    @eurtunwagens2359 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Excellent analysis. Just, one poin: I'm almost sure, you've said that the narrowest point of width of Malacca straight is 1.5 miles. I'd thought it is 24 miles.

  • @JS-ix6zt
    @JS-ix6zt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What’s crazy is we sacrificed the American manufacturing base and middle class desperately trying to stop any China Russia alliance and now we allowed that alliance to form regardless

  • @ahima1982
    @ahima1982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    very informative video, just a slight correction. The capabilities China is building up is Anti Access/Area Denial, often called A2/AD, not A2D2, which wouldn't match the words it stands for.

  • @aymonfoxc1442
    @aymonfoxc1442 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Great video. It's length (which I enjoyed) is unequivocally justified by the breadth and depth of research required to fully comprehend the issues surrounding such a large and important subject.

    • @agps4418
      @agps4418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take his videos with grains of salt.
      i'm an indonesian, and i can tell you his video about java island was stupid. it was inaccurate and misleading.
      this is after all just a content from a creator in a views-and-ad based platform

    • @louisd6410
      @louisd6410 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@agps4418there are a lot of mistakes and bias in the video, they got the ROC claim wrong. They even claimed mongolia

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@agps4418That's fair but it's a vast subject and a lot for one video to cover. I think it's good that people get introduced to the complexities of the South China Sea, Taiwan, and competing interests. Honestly, Java is a hard island for anybody to understand, yet alone outsiders.

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@louisd6410If I recall correctly, both sides have claimed Mongolia is Chinese but Mao couldn't pursue this because Mongolia was protected by the USSR. There's good reason for Mongolian 'communism'.

    • @agps4418
      @agps4418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aymonfoxc1442 not true, it's a simple thing: in reality, java is populous because facilities are better there and living cost is much cheaper than the rest of the country, this is due to the past president's programs. in his video, he said, java is populous simply because of food. totally inaccurate. the same thing is potentially happening with all his videos.

  • @troybond
    @troybond 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    wow the work that went into this video must be staggering

  • @m3po22
    @m3po22 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    Compared to last time I saw a video from you, I think you've vastly improved your vocal inflections to be much more natural. Great job.

    • @traviswilkins2864
      @traviswilkins2864 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's still a bit bothersome IMO. I haven't watched the others but the inflections still drive me crazy despite the solid content.

    • @ObamanableSnowman
      @ObamanableSnowman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Wow really? His inflections are pretty good in my opinions, I think that it helps tell the stories. I think y’all shouldn’t be providing recommendations about this to him, because most people who follow him like it.

    • @traviswilkins2864
      @traviswilkins2864 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ObamanableSnowman this is true. He’s obviously extremely successful. I don’t know why I felt the need to share my opinion 😅

    • @rizzlr
      @rizzlr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@traviswilkins2864 its okay to share your opinion. dont let anybody police what you say

    • @rizzlr
      @rizzlr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ObamanableSnowman they never recommended anything. it was an observation/opinion that was shared. Stop tryna censor people's opinions while in the same turn sharing your own.

  • @evandipasquale9255
    @evandipasquale9255 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    I mean no wonder china/usa relations are tense. If China had military bases anywhere near the United States main land then we'd already be at war. But the United States has basically built a pacific blockade around China. Doesn't exactly send a friendly message to china, but we can only imagine what china would do without our military presence.

    • @Illumirage
      @Illumirage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Imagine defending China....

    • @evandipasquale9255
      @evandipasquale9255 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Illumirage yeah there kinda in a poor spot, being surrounded by Russia, India and Japan/South Korea

    • @Illumirage
      @Illumirage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @evandipasquale9255 they've been Sabre rattling, threatening and stealing from everyone for 20 years. You're blatantly lying

    • @Illumirage
      @Illumirage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @evandipasquale9255 they're allied with Russia and India in BRICS, what's the issue here?

    • @asiansalami309
      @asiansalami309 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Illumirage remember cuba?

  • @aarons5689
    @aarons5689 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I am such a nerd. This was my favorite video in a long time. Thank you for making it.

  • @marknicolich5789
    @marknicolich5789 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Do we really believe China would not import as much oil as they want from Russia

  • @meronyu5452
    @meronyu5452 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Map error: ROC’s claimed territory includes Tibet and Mongolia

  • @levth01sct
    @levth01sct 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    You forgot to mention Diego Garcia and point it on the map, US Military Base in the Indian Ocean. I think that base would play a crucial role in the event of a war with China.

  • @LovelyBriVertefeuill
    @LovelyBriVertefeuill 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    lol I live on Okinawa and he said Kadena wrong but it’s an amazing island and the people here are so friendly. He’s not wrong about how heavily militarized it is here

    • @caffiend.
      @caffiend. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Okinawa is one of the military's favorite duty stations.

    • @BudiandLeo
      @BudiandLeo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I always heard that the Native Okinawans always got the shortest end of the stick in its long history.

    • @WaterFruitTree
      @WaterFruitTree 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      No -- he (shockingly) said Kadena right. The way USN/USAF personnel pronounce it is wrong 90% of the time.
      If you're stationed there, don't be lazy, learn Japanese.

    • @Bayard1503
      @Bayard1503 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BudiandLeo Well, even now they are forcefully assimilated, denied their language..

    • @M78ccc
      @M78ccc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have Okinawans ever thought that if they help the United States fight against China, they would suffer an unprecedented disaster, as Okinawa is under the firepower of China

  • @MohamedSaad-yo5ls
    @MohamedSaad-yo5ls 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    China: Why are you surrounding and harassing us?
    USA: Because i can

    • @thecooljohn100
      @thecooljohn100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because they are authoritarian and their people are afforded no inalienable rights.

    • @楚逸揚
      @楚逸揚 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The U.S. Treasury Department knows that China has used its ten-year trade surplus of 8 trillion U.S. dollars to replace the U.S. dollar debts of southern countries and lead the world in de-petrodollar hegemony. Why does the U.S. dare not launch a war against China? Because the U.S. Secretary of Defense knows that the Chinese stealth fighter J-20 has the power The phased array radar is one generation ahead of the F-35, the PL-15 air-to-air missile has twice the range of the Aim-260, the Fujian ship's electromagnetic catapult is ten years ahead of the Ford, and the DF-26 anti-ship missile allows the U.S. aircraft carrier fleet and the military in Asia The base instantly turned into ruins. Why did Napoleon and Hitler fail to unify Europe? Will MacArthur, the commander-in-chief of the 17-nation United Nations who was in full swing after World War II, be fired during the Korean War? Arrogance and ignorance are the biggest and most fatal flaws of human beings!😂

    • @BigBoss-sm9xj
      @BigBoss-sm9xj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      hell yeah i love it

    • @Nichole-wd5ce
      @Nichole-wd5ce 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      all while chinese military is infiltrating the US through the southern border.

    • @LukaszCantwell
      @LukaszCantwell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because of your habit of bullying the republics around and on your borders

  • @louisyip6622
    @louisyip6622 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    I think RealLifeLove tells it much better than Johnny Harris, not only giving a clear historical background, but also analyzing the current landscape of Taiwan and China, rather than just thinking American.

    • @blanchimont5587
      @blanchimont5587 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      johnny is getting better tho, his recent video on china's boarders was actually quite good. but rll is unmatched in his modern conflicts style of videos

    • @lxma
      @lxma 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      aren’t we all looking for RealLifeLove

    • @aaronyoghurt9210
      @aaronyoghurt9210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Jhonny is biased af. That's why I don't watch him anyomore. I know he's always using western lens

    • @adventurefaps9571
      @adventurefaps9571 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You mean CIA Harris?

    • @bane8305
      @bane8305 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dude Johnny is the most biased youtuber ever I stopped watching his shit years ago

  • @leonardowynnwidodo9704
    @leonardowynnwidodo9704 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Although very small, the 9-dash Line is also disputed with Indonesia's EEZ with the Natuna Islands

  • @kypirko5710
    @kypirko5710 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I really appreciate the way you explain things with great visuals and information. Thank you.

  • @stellanoxfleuret7134
    @stellanoxfleuret7134 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    首先,对于台湾,你自己也说了,大陆和台湾一直是处于内战状态,这并不是入侵,而是收复,不管是大陆统一台湾,还是并不可能发生的台湾统一大陆,不管谁统一谁,大陆和台湾一体的,现在,台湾知道自己是统一不了大陆了,就想从统一变成独立,但是不管台湾怎么想,这都只是我们的内战,和你们没有任何关系。
    第二,台湾对于大陆,和乌克兰对于俄罗斯,这完全是2回事
    第三,如果武统真的发生,美国不来最好,来就打,这倒不是很在意,更在意的是日本会不会加入,倒不如说,更希望日本会参与,日本胆敢参与,哪怕是爷爷辈的人也会嚷嚷着要参军的
    第四,你就说,美国有什么资格,什么理由下场参战?为了世界和平?对于俄罗斯这种联合国都承认的国家之间的战争不亲自下场去帮助所谓的弱小,却在中国内战想要出手阻止?更不要说正在加沙发生的事,美国所作的更是和和平相反的事。不过就是怕中国成为又一个像苏联一样美国忌惮的对手罢了,所以美国才会有一边承认台湾是中国的一部分,另一边又想方设法阻止台湾统一这种自相矛盾的笑话

    • @stellanoxfleuret7134
      @stellanoxfleuret7134 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      台湾的政客希望独立,独立成功就成为未来“台湾开国功臣”,美国希望希望用台湾拖垮中国,让中国衰落以继续维持自己的全球霸权。综上所述,这些所谓想帮助台湾的,没有一个是真正在乎台湾的,没跟人在乎台湾人会怎么样,没有人希望台湾好。。

    • @longdragon88
      @longdragon88 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      right

    • @treytakara9438
      @treytakara9438 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      +10 social credit

    • @sagewang3337
      @sagewang3337 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@treytakara9438 what is social credit. ive only knew social security number

    • @FieldsOfConfusion
      @FieldsOfConfusion 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Gye

  • @itsyaboytravlpro
    @itsyaboytravlpro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Hey man started watching you back when you were just starting. Very proud of you, and hope you do even better in the future

    • @80AM.
      @80AM. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you're like 12 stop

  • @SheraGoDRic
    @SheraGoDRic 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    China's One Belt One Road vs. America's One Bomb One Road

    • @Choomphol
      @Choomphol 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      2 bombs on innocent civilians 😢

  • @lou1958
    @lou1958 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +99

    Pakistan's cooperation with China and the unresolved border issues don't sit well with India. I could see them sit out a US/China conflict, unless it was in their interest to join in. I doubt very seriously they would be on China's side. Very well-done video with solid information. Thanks.

    • @VinVin21969
      @VinVin21969 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      india dont be in china side.. but they also wont sit with u.s . since they will get sacrificed.

    • @user-uj2tk2tv3z
      @user-uj2tk2tv3z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope
      The war between india and China is highly unlikely simply because we both have lot to lose and both india and China know this fact
      There will only be border skirmishes but never a full blown war

    • @Ironbanner12
      @Ironbanner12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      India knows the betrayal to be on China's side, 1962.

    • @user-uj2tk2tv3z
      @user-uj2tk2tv3z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@Ironbanner12 India never choose sides
      Our foreign policy is neutral as always

    • @Tirth-Patel
      @Tirth-Patel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@user-uj2tk2tv3zNot entirely neutral, but yeah the nature of the foreign policy is leaning towards that.

  • @chrisaustin6255
    @chrisaustin6255 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nobody is ever really prepared for the war they will fight, war is dynamic

  • @suddhojitgon5929
    @suddhojitgon5929 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Fantastic detailing coupled with excellent graphics. Every video fascinates me. Looking forward to more such fabulous content.

  • @JBG1995zgz
    @JBG1995zgz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Your videos are getting better, and better and better. An hour pass like 10 minutes. Congratulations. Super interesting Documentary!

  • @_vla
    @_vla 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    The original title just in case he's changing it: "How the US & China Are Preparing to Fight Total War"

    • @bustavonnutz
      @bustavonnutz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When he said "limited to naval engagements" I almost choked. This would be WWIII if it ever broke out. It would make the 20th century look like a joke in comparison.

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bustavonnutzDisagree. Who will come to China’s aid? Russia? Next joke. North Korea? Good joke. Who else? Vs: US, Japan, S. Korea, Australia, etc etc etc.

    • @UCantSeeemeee
      @UCantSeeemeee 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@CorePathway Skorea, Japan would be busy with Pyongyang and there is another headache for Anglo saxon empire . There is another sleeping giant in middle East that waiting a perfect time to drive out the infidel and believe not this is not 1940s that you send millions of Slaves soldiers from Africa, Asia, Latin America from their colonial countries to fight in world War 2 .
      This time no one will help Anglo soxon 😂

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@UCantSeeemeee amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics. Who is the sleeping giant in the Middle East, and how are they going to project power beyond their own borders?

    • @UCantSeeemeee
      @UCantSeeemeee 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CorePathway American will peed their pants when they hear 9/11
      US have never fought war in their soil in the last 200 years.
      Even goat herders and rice farmers beat the shit out of American yanks 😂.
      Amerikka has made countless enemies in the last 50 years , these time only the European white refugees will fight their war not some Asian, African, South American will fight for US hegemony.

  • @lemlau6861
    @lemlau6861 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Heal the world
    Make it a better place
    For you and for me
    And the entire human race
    There are people dying
    If you care enough for the living
    Make a better place
    For you and for me

  • @dannychu2014
    @dannychu2014 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Don't worry. China is not stupid to risk everything like Russia to just take Taiwan without provocation unless 1) Taiwan declares independence. 2) The US allows Taiwan to declare independence.

    • @johntang4108
      @johntang4108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      China is also not stupid not to eliminate all the US military bases in Taiwan, Philippines, Japan, South Korea before US can response. When all these US bases are overwhelmed, US may try to counteract by sending all her aircraft carriers and battle groups to Asia but will soon find that they cannot even sail or fly near the island chain.

    • @michelesonntag6756
      @michelesonntag6756 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johntang4108China doesn’t want a war with all of NATO

  • @user-rx162r
    @user-rx162r 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Imagine fighting for a country that constantly tells you you're evil.

    • @Kyle-fq4kq
      @Kyle-fq4kq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which country are you referring to?

    • @user-rx162r
      @user-rx162r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kyle-fq4kq The united states of DEI

  • @CastSenpai
    @CastSenpai 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    This was so comprehensive and well put together. I learned tons. Normally I never have this issue, but with so many decisions in this video I am 50/50 on which would happen. The preemptive strike against the US, for example. Still trying to decide which strategies China would end up actually employ IF they decide to invade, which itself I am almost 50/50 on.

    • @aguywithanopinion8912
      @aguywithanopinion8912 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Invade whom? You mean Taiwan, yeah? China aren't dumb enough to attack the US.

    • @TyroPirate
      @TyroPirate 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He definitely presented a lot of hypotheticals for how China would invade… but what evidence was presented that makes you feel 50/50 on if China would actually do it?

    • @CastSenpai
      @CastSenpai 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@TyroPirate Because they have alternatives, such as influencing elections, or perhaps other diplomatic option. Or just avoiding the drastic options due to the worldwide consequences. Do you feel 50/50 isn't accurate? I thought it was generous, considering the logistical weight of both the operation itself and how all foreign nations respond.

    • @TyroPirate
      @TyroPirate 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CastSenpai But RLL admits in the vid that the more popular support seems to be going for the Taiwanese Independence political party. So doesn’t seem like they are doing a good job at their propaganda breaking through to the people there… So… what are those other diplomatic options?
      And besides, it’s all “they could” and hypotheticals here. But what are the things that China is actually doing right now that might lead someone to thing they’ll try to take control of Taiwan (either politically or militarily). That’s why I’m not confident in 50/50. I feel like RLL didn’t give any good proof that China is gonna do it…
      But maybe I missed something?

    • @CastSenpai
      @CastSenpai 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TyroPirate They have good reason to, they also have good reason NOT to. They also are dealing with a time limit where it will eventually not become an option, similar to what Russia had going on before they invaded Ukraine. Also, China very recently released their claimed territory map, which was a MESS. They claimed land that is part of India, Nepal, Bhutan, and even Russia. Not to mention their extremely aggressive stance on the South China Sea. Point is, They seem to be very focused on projecting themselves very aggressively, which you could argue shows intent to follow through with their map visions.

  • @Robert399
    @Robert399 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    46:44 If China were visibly building up its forces on the coast, the US would hardly be surprised by a pre-emptive missile attack. Not saying it would be easy to deal with but US forces would definitely have time to prepare for the possibility.

  • @timothycampbell1107
    @timothycampbell1107 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The US has more military bases around the world than HVAC units in the public schools in Baltimore. This country is insane

    • @Emilechen
      @Emilechen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the problem is, it is too costly, we don't know if US have always enough financial capacity to keep all them forever,

    • @timthetiny7538
      @timthetiny7538 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But less than grains of sand on the beach

    • @fios4528
      @fios4528 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Emilechen yeah, HVAC can be expensive

    • @MUISHAGGY572
      @MUISHAGGY572 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And it still wouldn't stand a chance against BRICS and if they did go to war iit would quickly become a ww3 and North Korea along with other countries would join BRICS.

    • @jeffrey7cp992
      @jeffrey7cp992 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Shows who the trouble maker or aggressor can be.

  • @tibbles1
    @tibbles1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Johnny Harris just released a TH-cam video about the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar and it wasn’t demonetized or under-promoted. Seems like this is more about exclusivity on a paid platform than it is about the TH-cam algorithm.

    • @seijiamasawa2428
      @seijiamasawa2428 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wow! he wants to make a living. How dare he!

    • @tibbles1
      @tibbles1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@seijiamasawa2428 If he wants to make more money from Nebula content he’s entitled to do so. But don’t lie about your motivations and blame it on the TH-cam algorithm.

    • @seijiamasawa2428
      @seijiamasawa2428 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tibbles1 Okay. I will give you that one

  • @gary7466
    @gary7466 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Very impresive. A lot of info, good footage and analysis. Well done.

    • @Prosecutor3000
      @Prosecutor3000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He talking shit. 80% of this information is not proofed and only based on information of us lgbtq forces.

    • @gary7466
      @gary7466 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      No he is not. What do you mean 'proofed'. You are the one talking shit.

  • @yadwinderpurewal6823
    @yadwinderpurewal6823 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very Informative and Realistic regarding past and present of the total situation… Great and a very Intelligent Work..
    Big Ups for the true information.. Cheers Mate… Keep It Up this good work and grow even much much more for the cause of Goodness..

  • @everypitchcounts4875
    @everypitchcounts4875 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    US is developing a few different mobile launch platforms to have in Guam and Philippines. Typhon weapon system which would be armed with SM-6 & Tomahawk cruise missiles, NMESIS armed with NSM, Dark Eagle mobile launchers armed with LRHW. Can't forget about the new HACM.

  • @lukedenbeaux6367
    @lukedenbeaux6367 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    China has not built 3 of their own aircraft carriers. They modified a russian one, built one and are building a third

    • @suckit758
      @suckit758 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are all crap

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Incorrect. The bought one from Ukraine, made 2, building the fourth.

    • @lukedenbeaux6367
      @lukedenbeaux6367 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @elmohead i didn't know that they bought the carrier from Ukraine, but it was still russian/ussr made. And you should probably fact check that they have 3 operational aircraft carriers. Cause I cannot find any source for that

    • @01taran
      @01taran 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@lukedenbeaux6367 They don't. They have one operational, one undergoing upgrade/shakedown to deal with issues, and one under construction.
      Also, comparing those carriers to US Carriers is a bit misleading.
      2 of the Chinese carriers are smaller, and to allow for rapid takeoff make use of the 'Ski-Jump' style decks. These decks are very effective, but have a set of trade-offs. The biggest of which is that the munitions loads are extremely limited while using them. One of them is Laioning, which is the one from Ukraine that was only 80% complete when sold to China. It's classmates have not fared particularly well in service for Russia or India, and it is pretty poorly engineered.

    • @zarategabe
      @zarategabe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do we need to have a war with China?!

  • @julesverneinoz
    @julesverneinoz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Thanks for this coverage, very informative and great quality.
    Not covered in this video:
    - Continued raw resource acquisition by China from various countries to build weapons (eg. iron)
    - Their manufacturing capability (eg. for weapon and overall self-sufficiency in a protracted war)
    - Cyber warfare capability

    • @大案要案命案在身
      @大案要案命案在身 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      谁在想和中国人开战。

    • @jsmsolutions868
      @jsmsolutions868 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      could you tell me which country has been involved in the most wars since War-War-II? Is Taiwan a country?

    • @filex-ll5jd
      @filex-ll5jd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      白看了,讲的很清楚,美国@@大案要案命案在身

    • @Reflectic_
      @Reflectic_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol

    • @iceteazen
      @iceteazen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jsmsolutions868 US of course but China made these situation dire for themselves. Imagine pissing off your neighbors with multiple territorial claims. Some of this neighbors are historically US ally. So that got them it to this big trouble were they cannot retake Taiwan anymore. There is simple no way they can fight that many countries.

  • @marjtayao1232
    @marjtayao1232 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great detailed video ❤

  • @breezer20
    @breezer20 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I love how you keep using icons for troops, tanks, aircraft carriers and nukes from the game civ6 it looks really goofy but good in its own way

  • @Ar1AnX1x
    @Ar1AnX1x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    in a strange way its kinda interesting how all the nations that were involved in World War 1 and World War 2 are now military allies

    • @facuufernandezz5070
      @facuufernandezz5070 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Because they have never faced a threat bigger than them

    • @Chuked
      @Chuked 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its possible that all the countries fighting right now will be allies in World War 4

    • @YakiraShatz
      @YakiraShatz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Not all. Russia and China were both involved, Russia was even a major player.

    • @Little-chilli
      @Little-chilli 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😅可能在你的大脑里只有,英美法这三个国家。

    • @drpepper3838
      @drpepper3838 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Nothing new. Alliances change all the time. Look at history

  • @miikalehtimaki1136
    @miikalehtimaki1136 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As someone with deuteropia, I'd liked some more contrast in the Myanmar graphic in 52:16. Great stuff otherwise, as always!

  • @Xavier_Destalis
    @Xavier_Destalis หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was about to comment that you'd forgotten one of the few other things than the US keeping China in check, and then I was recommended your video on the theoretical upcoming Indo-China war. 10/10 algorithmic planning.

  • @calebdesjardins616
    @calebdesjardins616 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Every video you put out makes me more and more nervous for a world war haha but thank you for the incredible info