Li-Fi, 100X Faster Than Wi-Fi! | ColdFusion

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Li-Fi looks to be yet another disruptive technology, this time in communication, which has remained with the same wireless technology since the year 2000.
    A correction* I was supposed to say South Korea's world record STANDARD speed of 100mbps
    Subscribe here: goo.gl/9FS8uF
    Become a Patreon!: / coldfusion_tv
    Ted Talk: • Wireless data from eve...
    Other sources:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi
    www.smh.com.au/technology/tech...
    purelifi.com/
    Hi, welcome to ColdFusion (formally known as ColdfusTion).
    Experience the cutting edge of the world around us in a fun relaxed atmosphere.
    //Soundtrack//
    Taquami - You R Everything
    Haring - Us
    Porter Robinson - Sea of Voices (RAC Mix)
    Idle Mind - Mine (feat. Paul Francis)
    Hot Toddy - Down to Love (Henry Krinkle's Lush Haus Mix)
    Burn Water - My Everything (Unreleased)
    » Google + | www.google.com/+coldfustion
    » Facebook | / coldfusiontv
    » Patreon: / coldfusion_tv
    » My music | burnwater.bandcamp.com or
    » / burnwater
    » / coldfusion_tv
    » Collection of music used in videos: • ColdFusion's 2 Hour Me...
    Producer: Dagogo Altraide
    Editing website: www.cfnstudios.com
    Coldfusion Android Launcher: play.google.com/store/apps/de...
    » Twitter | @ColdFusion_TV
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @zacharyaguirre9151
    @zacharyaguirre9151 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1076

    Me today: Shitty Wi-Fi, can only watch videos at 144p
    Future people: Shitty Li-Fi, can only watch videos at 4K at 60 FPS

    • @guibelson4809
      @guibelson4809 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      LMAO

    • @sayonarax2004
      @sayonarax2004 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Stop whining child.

    • @anjopag31
      @anjopag31 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      ^^ Salty.

    • @facelesstongue128
      @facelesstongue128 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      I remember 56K dial ups and downloading a 5mb song took 20 min.
      Fuck we had no video but flash games

    • @abj9121
      @abj9121 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      you must have had some good brand modem, us robotics or what? I had 14kbs modem and the ISP was giving like half kbs most times

  • @Surkee
    @Surkee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1886

    Next: GR-Fi
    GR = Gamma Ray
    Maximum speed: ~500 Terrabytes per picosecond.
    Sure, the radiation would kill you almost instantly, and you'd need an insane amount of electrical current, but it would work! Amirite?

    • @FireAngel842
      @FireAngel842 8 ปีที่แล้ว +171

      Rate 10/10 would gamma again -IGN

    • @AlxM96
      @AlxM96 8 ปีที่แล้ว +128

      I bet if you started a kickstart on this you would be fully backed in a hour

    • @noel8604
      @noel8604 8 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      +AmateurTH-camr It can kill you? I thought it just turns you into the Hulk.

    • @shrikantjha9860
      @shrikantjha9860 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Noel Tirado i hope tou are joking

    • @suannoir
      @suannoir 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Truly hit my funny bone with this comment 😅

  • @solobackpacking
    @solobackpacking 5 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    LiFi security?
    Curtains.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Or just stick someone's fat ass in there ... supposedly it doesn't travel well though flesh (more precisely through the water in the body). xD

    • @mishal321
      @mishal321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BillAnt wot

    • @MegaGangsta4life
      @MegaGangsta4life 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @circuit10
      @circuit10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BillAnt That's 5G, this is light (light can't go through flesh either but it's not the water, light can go through water)

    • @Zeekiel
      @Zeekiel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahahhahahp

  • @cstemshorn
    @cstemshorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    2021 still waiting for Li-Fi

  • @ColdFusion
    @ColdFusion  8 ปีที่แล้ว +438

    Li-Fi looks to be yet another disruptive technology, this time in communication. Just to clarify, Li-Fi will probably work alongside Wi-Fi and not replace it completely. Though with a download speed of 18 movies in one second, it's a lot faster!
    Enjoy the video.

    • @vaibhavgupta8385
      @vaibhavgupta8385 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You are again the best

    • @maoudinkun
      @maoudinkun 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LiFi works with wifi?

    • @theanantshukla
      @theanantshukla 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You are seriously epic mahn. Great job and continue doing this.! Loved the last Tata video too

    • @BRVvideos
      @BRVvideos 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +ColdFusion Thank you for always making highly knowledgeable content

    • @DeeJay00001
      @DeeJay00001 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Great video but I'm not sure if I heard anything about security

  • @andrewkeener5480
    @andrewkeener5480 7 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    someone behind the curtain just hit pause when he put his hand under the light.

    • @mattmatt7381
      @mattmatt7381 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Andrew Keener Yeah if the wifi is so good shouldnt it have already been able to stream the whole thing even if "LiFi" Was disconnected? Like shouldnt it have preloaded the rest of the vid

  • @Money-talking
    @Money-talking 4 ปีที่แล้ว +181

    3 years later... This Li-Fi seems like a lie...

    • @oddnwmbers
      @oddnwmbers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      *4

    • @ydziros
      @ydziros 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Well... I wouldn't say it's a lie, it just seems really inconvenient. Wi-Fi IS good exactly because it goes through walls and in all directions. I can't really imagine any circumstance where Li-Fi is usable, except for lab conditions. For a stationary pc - if you can run a wire for Li-Fi to a nearest lamp, you can probably just run wired connection to that pc anyway. For a laptop or phone - any obstruction, or angle change has non-illusory chance to mess up connection.
      So, it's not "a lie", it's just... Why?

    • @yunus6009
      @yunus6009 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha right

    • @lediozefi5784
      @lediozefi5784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Lie-fi

    • @rob-123
      @rob-123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ydziros try using wifi in a enterprise environment and it is rubbish. I hope Wifi 6 is better but i dont think that will provide a good service with the ever increasing data demands of systems.

  • @MrErick1160
    @MrErick1160 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ColdFusion, I was on your channel when you had 50k followers. It's crazy how far you went! you are an inspiration!

  • @JumpzVidz
    @JumpzVidz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    The future future people will be saying oh insecure lifi is and how we need to make to something 1000x faster... gamma rays

    • @danielg3857
      @danielg3857 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      and their bodies will just be radiation protected robot exoskeletons, so they'll use it

    • @neonmonster9272
      @neonmonster9272 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That's how the apocalypse will start

    • @nicu8145
      @nicu8145 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      _Jumpz_ how a bout the planet being transformed into a WiFi router ? 😀😀

    • @nicu8145
      @nicu8145 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      _Jumpz_ how a bout the planet being transformed into a WiFi router ? 😀😀

    • @TastyTarco
      @TastyTarco 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      _Jumpz_ or Laser beams!!

  • @ExpertGamingOnline
    @ExpertGamingOnline 7 ปีที่แล้ว +176

    Im watching this in the year 2169 we got su-fi now with download and upload speeds of 1terabyte a second.

    • @foulcamel5973
      @foulcamel5973 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      We download genes now

    • @trollimusprime8521
      @trollimusprime8521 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I'm from the year 2369, and we don't have to worry about data transfer, all of reality is now a multiverse simulation run by algorithms built into the quantum structure of matter it's self. Everything just runs it's self.

    • @BlueBeefalo
      @BlueBeefalo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      pssssh 1tbps is laughable. 90pbps is where it's at

    • @maskiez
      @maskiez 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I live in 2469, and earth is no longer exist. i'm one of the lucky person who made their way to another planet 1 trillion light years away from earth. Sometime I go to the old Earth's moon for vacation and I am able to communicate with the new earth in real time.

    • @berliandro
      @berliandro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Guys... im 4735... we created thousands of planet, and we got Wo-Ho-Fi, the speed of *Worm Hole Fidelity* is 1 Yotabyte per 1 zepto second. and 1 thing i want to tell you... CRISPR really safe our species until now!

  • @bahaatamer1245
    @bahaatamer1245 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Mom: OFF TO STUDY!
    me: no mom
    Mom: *turns off my Light*

  • @JasonMcNamara
    @JasonMcNamara 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Since discovering ColdFusion TV about a week ago I have watched soooo many of Adgogo’s incredible videos that I actually noticed a reused clip at 6:14 when a Vince Vaughn looking dude is walking down the street. That’s not a critique, it’s actually respect. I make videos too and I have to applaud ColdFusion TV for the incredible research and countless hour put into both gathering the footage, editing the videos and making us all so much more educated... FOR FREE!!! Every subscriber & viewer here is smarter because of this channel. Thank you.

  • @KalpeshPatel78
    @KalpeshPatel78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    Downloading a movie within seconds. Shadow falls on the device at 99.9%

    • @fett716
      @fett716 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

    • @WayneJohnsonZastil
      @WayneJohnsonZastil 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One big shadow!

    • @misium
      @misium 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you just said it takes seconds to download the movie, in worst case you just do it again

    • @KalpeshPatel78
      @KalpeshPatel78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      misium Its about how irritating downloads can be. :P

    • @jaystarr6571
      @jaystarr6571 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Just get a cybernetic eye. Then you could just beam the internet directly into your brain by staring at the light bulbs for a few hours.

  • @kalebbruwer
    @kalebbruwer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    So you want optic fibre without the cable. The cable is there for a reason: it's more stable.

    • @pythyyy5115
      @pythyyy5115 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Kaleb Bruwer why are you against this

    • @h00b00
      @h00b00 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But light bulbs are more abundant and accessible so with proper redundancy this can actually work really well esp. for rural areas.

    • @kalebbruwer
      @kalebbruwer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Bhoopati Baboo
      1: You lose connection whenever something passes between you and the lightbulb, Imagine playing games like that!
      2: This system is still going to be bottlenecked by the speed at witch your lightbulb communicates with the server, witch does not benefit from this technology and IS our present bottleneck already.
      3: Why is this better in candle-lit rural areas?

    • @Emma-kz3zr
      @Emma-kz3zr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cody Nemo, in 1999 the UK considered 33k more than adequate, 4mb isn't anywhere near the requirement for multiple devices streaming 4k in house hold (e.g 3x TVS + 4x hand held), nevermind taking into account multiple devices 4k+ uploads requirements.

    • @A15Channel
      @A15Channel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      What if they build a device that you could mount on your console or laptop that produces the light, like a stick on flashlight, problem solved.

  • @moviescores9315
    @moviescores9315 4 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    its 2019
    it Li-ED

    • @goodchap4537
      @goodchap4537 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello, person from 2020, organisations are looking into li-fi as it's much more secure than wifi as it cannot get through walls also the speeds at which data can be transferred is alot better

    • @omair.raza1
      @omair.raza1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goodchap4537 people can use fibre waves sensors to collect the data from lifi so its not that safe

    • @justin3594
      @justin3594 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha. I see what you did there.

    • @silentstorm5439
      @silentstorm5439 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goodchap4537 I'm a person from 2021 and I'm doing a research project for Boeing on Lifi so yes it is more secure and it just takes a long time to get a new system like this in place, people expect change to happen over night but innovation takes a lot of time to really take place

  • @melvin4681
    @melvin4681 5 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    100x faster than wi-fi. That alone makes it a great idea.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Right, but someone's fat ass blocking the signal makes it a bad idea.

    • @martinhltr
      @martinhltr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      is only 2x faster😂

    • @atlien1988
      @atlien1988 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not 100x faster...not yet anyway.

    • @luhiko5923
      @luhiko5923 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No this video sucks. Wifi can go to 1000mbps+. Lifi is 100mbps. Eew

    • @omair.raza1
      @omair.raza1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@luhiko5923 only nasa has that fast wifi

  • @SandmanDeltaForce1
    @SandmanDeltaForce1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1246

    Say goodbye to good old days of watching porn in the dark XD

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya 8 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      did you watch the video? the light can be transmitted at a brightness not perceivable by human eyes.

    • @SandmanDeltaForce1
      @SandmanDeltaForce1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +137

      Kaffi O I was just making a joke. I saw the whole video

    • @matthewsonguad3313
      @matthewsonguad3313 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      just dim the lights

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +170

      +Kaffi O Lets have a moment of silence for people who dont understand jokes

    • @Kaodusanya
      @Kaodusanya 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Anshuman Jain =(

  • @thallium200
    @thallium200 8 ปีที่แล้ว +302

    This is all talking about downlink.
    What about uplink? The other half of the WiFi equation.

    • @m1aws
      @m1aws 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Consider. What is your uplink internet speed, its slower. Why not use a different colour (IR?) Led for uplink.

    • @sMASHsound
      @sMASHsound 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      i have that same question. and then there is the line of sight issue. its just like sending internet via lasers.
      one potential option i have just thought of is to have multiple sensors around a room, and the mobile device will be able to emit light signal in any orientation, because in nearly every plane, a sensor would be able to capture the signal.
      and to further that, all street lamps could be converted to send/receive signals. so it wouldn't be a long distance interface, but more like a localized net, meant for high traffic zones. but, it is cheap. u just need a modified modem and led lamps for the transmission, and then receiver sensors for the reception. then connect to the net.
      the main advantage would be the speed, and that would only really be useful if 20 people want to live stream 4k at the same time in the same place.

    • @m1aws
      @m1aws 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ashmeed Mohammed Imagine if they were all on a mesh network...

    • @Rapbando
      @Rapbando 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only the visible light spectrum theoretical bandwidth today is around 100 ZB/s. That's all 2015 year world data traffic times 100, but in a second!!! If you leave 2 of the 7 visible colors reserved for uplink it's more than enough

    • @m1aws
      @m1aws 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rapbando the infrared band makes it 3x wider.

  • @reganisawesome123
    @reganisawesome123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    *Instantly installs GTA 5 at work*
    Me: hell yeah!
    *boss comes in*
    *uninstalls GTA 5*
    Boss: What are you doing?
    Me: nothing
    *boss leaves*
    *reinstalls GTA 5*

    • @omerjamalelden2012
      @omerjamalelden2012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Installation has nothing to do with internet speed, download is.

    • @ohno3730
      @ohno3730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@omerjamalelden2012 ok geek

  • @jonasforsberg8199
    @jonasforsberg8199 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I like that wifi goes through walls, kind of its main selling point is that it's not typically hindered by physical obstructions, meaning you have more freedom while still being connected.

  • @Sal3600
    @Sal3600 8 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    South Korea's world record internet speeds are only 100Mbits/s? Come on, it has to be faster than that.

    • @ColdFusion
      @ColdFusion  8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      +Sal3600 Thanks for picking that up! I was supposed to say: "South Korea has a world record STANDARD internet speed of 100Mbp/s." I've added a correction note in the description.

    • @ViorelIanasi
      @ViorelIanasi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +Sal3600 I have 1Gbps in Romania :)

    • @invalidsudo
      @invalidsudo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +ColdFusion It would also be nice to make an annotation :)

    • @citigroup64
      @citigroup64 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Viorel Ianasi is that over wifi? If so you must be from the future because no current router would be able to do that consistently if at all

    • @maitralala
      @maitralala 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sal3600 look at something interesting about Europe : speeds up to 500 Mbps not just 100 as in Korea !!! www.romania-insider.com/broadband-internet-romania/147305/ or this one from an internet provider www.upc.ro/internet/abonamente/fiber-power-500/ .....

  • @kevineusebio
    @kevineusebio 8 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    Who needs a life when you got LiFi? 😂

    • @DavidEsotica
      @DavidEsotica 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +kevin eusebio clever girl

    • @sexelonsexelon3351
      @sexelonsexelon3351 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      it is not going to work in dark

    • @jancelic6450
      @jancelic6450 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sexelon Sexelon You just turn on the light

    • @archie6371
      @archie6371 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Sexelon Sexelon He said it could work in 'light' not visible to humans = Dark!

    • @hollymolly518
      @hollymolly518 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

  • @ajjukevicius4710
    @ajjukevicius4710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    biggest problem with this - communication must be bidirectional, that means light bulbs will have to have ability not only to emit light, but also to receive; handset devices will have to have to have not only an "eye" to receive the light, but also a bulb on itself (not necessarily visible light bulb, maybe IR or UV) and that bulb must be quite powerful in order for it's beams to bounce off walls and floors.

  • @PresidentialWinner
    @PresidentialWinner 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta appreciate the fact that even though there were 2 minor mistakes, you still managed to correct them both. Precise work, considering this is the first video ever i have seen from you that contains mistakes!

  • @CallumJenner
    @CallumJenner 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This is easily my favourite TH-cam channel, you put so much effort into all of your videos :)

  • @colinjackson9720
    @colinjackson9720 7 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    This would be so impractical. The benefit of radio is that it passes through surfaces. ANYTHING opaque would stop visible light Internet...

    • @sigspearthumb3904
      @sigspearthumb3904 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      However how many times do you find yourself in a dark room?... See?

    • @savagekando4677
      @savagekando4677 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There is also the problem of you'r device sending the data back , the internet is a 2 way street ! you will need light's and receptors everywhere in the room and a big light on you'r device to send the data back ! it's a stupid idea , and stupid people will take the fishbait and invest in this , so sad !

    • @risalalfiandi1008
      @risalalfiandi1008 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's not stupid, and they will figure it out somehow (about the 2 way data)

    • @neerajdubey5334
      @neerajdubey5334 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah that's an advantage in wifi but, it also is a demerit for security reasons, as out of your room any one can access, and hack it and can steal your information,
      this, property of being blocked by an opaque surface serves as a merit in lifi when you are more concerned about privacy,
      on addition radio waves used for wifi are harmful which limits it's usability in radiation sensitive areas, like hospitals, aeroplanes, nuclear power plants. . .

    • @neerajdubey5334
      @neerajdubey5334 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Polner , you can dim the light to negligible, if it's not at a far distance it's sensitive enough to handle your comfort.

  • @1772axaypatel
    @1772axaypatel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Speed doesn't only depend on your Wifi, Gr-Fi or any other Lifi thing, It depends on your TCP/IP link speed too. Right now, Wifi with 802.11ac feature we can get max 1Gbps, and In future (means 1-2 years only) It will rise to more speed (ideally 10Gbps) and So, WiFi is very much mature and progressive thing. Nobody easily can replace it.

  • @modifiedfuckingmaizestarch
    @modifiedfuckingmaizestarch 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was here before 10k now I've just come back to your channel I knew you'd make it congrats on a mil dude

  • @EricArts
    @EricArts 8 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Ayy, I'm from Estonia. I didn't know they used this technology there :o

    • @kalev_9
      @kalev_9 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Same, kinda baffled that we haven't heard of it, usually they brag about every tehnological thing here

    • @adityaravishankar8344
      @adityaravishankar8344 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      ***** Do you all get stoned?

    • @adityaravishankar8344
      @adityaravishankar8344 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      ***** E'stonia'

    • @EricArts
      @EricArts 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aditya Ravishankar
      I can't say for everyone but most of the people that I know do :D

    • @DaFrekkinNoob
      @DaFrekkinNoob 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +EricArts Vaatasin ka et ossa raisk eestis veits hull tehnoloogia. Kuigi me oleme jah peaaegu kõige tehnoloogilisem riik, või nii. :D

  • @deadpoolreborn5322
    @deadpoolreborn5322 7 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    now I can send friend request to aliens.

    • @librosxelnhaks7273
      @librosxelnhaks7273 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was sent by radio waves and they got but ignored it they found it very slow or outdated and they knew who were the senders, etc.

    • @fbifbi9528
      @fbifbi9528 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Delete you comment

  • @startupstoryinc.2704
    @startupstoryinc.2704 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So in love with this video. Thanks Dagogo!

  • @blurrxyfaceex6126
    @blurrxyfaceex6126 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Tesla said “Everything is the Light”.

  • @SuperSaf
    @SuperSaf 8 ปีที่แล้ว +187

    Awesome video once again, very interesting

    • @ColdFusion
      @ColdFusion  8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      +SuperSaf TV Cheers mate!

    • @joshbriggsDayZBeast
      @joshbriggsDayZBeast 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +SuperSaf TV HI SAF :3

    • @asheralegre1954
      @asheralegre1954 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I watched your z5 Sony vids

    • @sharyl01
      @sharyl01 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +asher alegre I've one

    • @makaisenki
      @makaisenki 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +SuperSaf TV Why is it very interesting? All we got out of this was how to receive data. Not in any way shape or form how the device communicates back. How would we upload to the lightbulb? How would we have to reconfigure it?
      We are talking about optical fiber through the air... That's not terribly interesting if the communication is mostly 1 directional. I'm not drilling holes in the ceiling to wire these things up... even if I did the wires would limit throughput, etc...

  • @youareaweaslecuntswamp3763
    @youareaweaslecuntswamp3763 7 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Well 2016 is ending, has the damn thing improved?

    • @ThePyroTempest
      @ThePyroTempest 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      www.sciencealert.com/a-new-type-of-li-fi-has-reportedly-cracked-40-gigabits-per-second-100-times-faster-than-regular-wi-fi
      Apparently, current progress has reached 40 Gbps.

    • @Skullord222
      @Skullord222 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      2017, light still can't pass through walls, what a waste.

    • @thavrisco1632
      @thavrisco1632 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It will be at least 2022 before it's comercialized

    • @readmore3208
      @readmore3208 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shimaqan
      simple glass walls

    • @katakisLives
      @katakisLives 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I haven't heard much more regarding Lifi for ages! quite often this is how technological ideas die! you just suddenly realize it hasn't been spoken of for ages.

  • @Shawnmyrelle
    @Shawnmyrelle 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just looked at a bunch of Amazon reviews. This is still in it's early stages. Some of the reviews were hard to understand (especially if you're not a tech person), but what I gathered was that people's bulbs were going out, this required some kind of subscription for "additional features" and they're far more expensive than one would expect- considering the aim is to change the world. Li-Fi is a cool concept, but i'll wait a bit longer...

  • @cherryscarlett
    @cherryscarlett 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:26 _basically, it just codes light signals.. it turns them into complex language that programs a visual signal the projector uses_

  • @rahulharikr
    @rahulharikr 8 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    You make good videos.... Now my favorites include ColdFusion and MKBHD.

    • @Tate525
      @Tate525 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Austin Evans, Jonathan Morrison, LinusTechTips and Detroit Borg check them out too great channels

    • @rkiwtir1146
      @rkiwtir1146 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sanath Chavan unbox Therapy?

    • @Tate525
      @Tate525 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ritwik Sharma yup forgot to mention

    • @stuartkeating6508
      @stuartkeating6508 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Don't forget SoFloAntonio, PrankInvasion and Vitalyzdtv

    • @stuartkeating6508
      @stuartkeating6508 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Aristocles Plato Nah man, they are the most intellectual and professional pranksters out there....Of course I'm joking, I hate those fucking channels. Lol

  • @TinRapper
    @TinRapper 8 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    What a time to be alive!

    • @MatthewColbourn
      @MatthewColbourn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Max Đỗ I agree Totaly!

    • @JoeARedHawk275
      @JoeARedHawk275 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It still has many flaws though. But I agree!

    • @TheEpicbuttercraft
      @TheEpicbuttercraft 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      By Drake and Future

    • @brandonwiebe2647
      @brandonwiebe2647 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Joe A. Yeah but so did every other invention when it was first made

    • @TinRapper
      @TinRapper 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ***** Sorry for what's going on mate. I hope you and your love ones are doing ok.

  • @ZeyuYT
    @ZeyuYT 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can i buy this?!!

  • @deeptanshusurya6399
    @deeptanshusurya6399 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The videos that u make are mindblowing and has a lot of enriched information
    Thank you so much for the work thst u bring to us.

  • @imhazard0uz
    @imhazard0uz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +170

    Use the sun for Li-fi, internet for all.

    • @pythyyy5115
      @pythyyy5115 7 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      don't let the aliens steal our internet

    • @theuncanspan
      @theuncanspan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      internet in day time only

    • @OmegaF77
      @OmegaF77 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      It takes light from the sun 8 minutes to get to Earth. It would be more like massive lag for all.

    • @j777111able
      @j777111able 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reuben U 😂

    • @zaviusfirerave
      @zaviusfirerave 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No internet inside your house, then.

  • @mackysobrevega1780
    @mackysobrevega1780 8 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Watching in 144p on dial up!

    • @rateater420
      @rateater420 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Dial up has been confirmed to be 10000X more powerful than LiFi the government just doesnt want you too be able to use it's true power

    • @rateater420
      @rateater420 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dial up has been confirmed to be 10000X more powerful than LiFi the government just doesnt want you too be able to use it's true power

    • @JoyfullJuneBugg
      @JoyfullJuneBugg 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank You AT&T

    • @ManishKumarIITG
      @ManishKumarIITG 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jett Aniceto Stuff they don't want you to know kind of stuff.

    • @karanbirsinghbhullar
      @karanbirsinghbhullar 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      what is the speed you are getting and where,if i might ask

  • @FooForce7
    @FooForce7 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Q: What do you call Wi-fi that fibs?
    A: Li-fi!

    • @theswiftdodo5870
      @theswiftdodo5870 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ahaha omg one year and im the only one who finds this hillarious XD nice one lol

  • @MrDarryl90210
    @MrDarryl90210 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing technology from a source we never even considered before now...

  • @AmitKriplani87
    @AmitKriplani87 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    "hey move away, you are blocking my youtube"!!

  • @weirdshamanwizzard3156
    @weirdshamanwizzard3156 7 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    This would suck because you couldn't be online in the dark

    • @lilimccoy6194
      @lilimccoy6194 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ir leds

    • @taylormaddox5198
      @taylormaddox5198 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      they said you would use a light that is dark enough that you wouldn't be able to see it but your device would still work with it

    • @Runslik3Wind
      @Runslik3Wind 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ikr i dont want a light show in my house.

    • @ayumuchan3541
      @ayumuchan3541 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just focus the light on your device only, the device still emits light so you're never in complete dark anyways.

    • @enigma9306
      @enigma9306 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As he said, you can have a light on and not see it on

  • @victorwilliams4403
    @victorwilliams4403 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos rock!! Very informative.

  • @danielstone7793
    @danielstone7793 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video and awesome channel. Subbed.

  • @iTzGlitcherr
    @iTzGlitcherr 8 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    This is amazing! So interesting, please keep making videos

    • @Oscar_Armstrong
      @Oscar_Armstrong 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +iTzGlitcherr hay glitcher i like your vids but you should do some bo3 and bo2

    • @iTzGlitcherr
      @iTzGlitcherr 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks bud, I hopefully will soon just been busy

    • @Oscar_Armstrong
      @Oscar_Armstrong 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** awesome your cool, what console do you play on? Just to make sure.

    • @iTzGlitcherr
      @iTzGlitcherr 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Oscar Armstrong mostly on Xbox one, but occasionally ps4 and pc

    • @Oscar_Armstrong
      @Oscar_Armstrong 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** cool if you wouldn't might it might be cool to play with you one day (when i get my ps4). Good luck with the vids ;D

  • @BrianThomas
    @BrianThomas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    It's fiber communication without the glass?!

    • @douglask2903
      @douglask2903 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Pretty much

    • @MiguelX413
      @MiguelX413 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Brian Thomas even faster

    • @BrianThomas
      @BrianThomas 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      lbpfan950 Faster? How fast?

    • @MiguelX413
      @MiguelX413 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brian Thomas
      ill use google fiber as an example, its goes 1 Gb/s, Li-Fi cann go about 10 Gb/s

    • @BrianThomas
      @BrianThomas 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Comcast has Gigabit Pro they're offering 3Gbps actually. 2Gbps for the wired, and 1Gbps for wireless. It's a pretty cool offering, but IC what you mean 10Gbps is pretty fast. Fast enough to feed video to a small town.

  • @risack8640
    @risack8640 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best TH-camr hands down ...you inspires me coldfuse

  • @jeremyo1457
    @jeremyo1457 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video, great explanation ))

  • @Bacon-ol3yr
    @Bacon-ol3yr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Higher frequency= less range
    Light can't penetrate opaque objects

    • @7kortos7
      @7kortos7 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      i would just get a small light, make a shade for it around the receiver and just leave it on.

    • @patriciomk939
      @patriciomk939 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      unless u have light everywhere

    • @patriciomk939
      @patriciomk939 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      they said u could dim the light so the human eye wouldnt notice

    • @angelioto007
      @angelioto007 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I still wonder how do you upload thing to the internet though...

    • @Bacon-ol3yr
      @Bacon-ol3yr 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kyro Lights? Yes. A Li-Fi transmitter? Probably not.

  • @spdzodzo
    @spdzodzo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +419

    how about if i want to watch porn in a dark room? would this work?

    • @pdarddy112
      @pdarddy112 7 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      spdzodzo you'd have to download it. In a millisecond.

    • @sigspearthumb3904
      @sigspearthumb3904 7 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      Then you'd rethink your life quit watching that trash, and treat a girl the right way then live life happily ever after. Thanking LiFi for a life changing experience. :)

    • @thaihoangcfc
      @thaihoangcfc 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      +立黄 pffffttt 😂😂😂

    • @krypton7900
      @krypton7900 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      well the light wouldn't technically be off, it's just so dim that the human eye can't detect light but technology can still detect light, but wasting several years of your life watching porn is a stupid decision

    • @bookle5829
      @bookle5829 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not watching the whole video, huh?

  • @rumatadestora
    @rumatadestora 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Writing back from 2020. Li-fi ain't still here. When?)))

    • @BBBBBB-rd8gg
      @BBBBBB-rd8gg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some evil forces are holding it back no doubt. Cause Wi-fi is dangerous to living things and they want to keep it around as long as they can. Wi-fi can be weaponized and used for population control.

    • @Alimhabidi
      @Alimhabidi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@BBBBBB-rd8gg load of BS you dumbphuck 🤣🤣🤣

  • @jaybaxi75
    @jaybaxi75 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video. Could you please make a video on smart homes, or home automation technology and its future

  • @alexstromberg7696
    @alexstromberg7696 8 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Normal wi-fi is better. Why? Light doesn't go through walls.

    • @aaronstone360
      @aaronstone360 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      your mind isnt capable of going through wall

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      +alex strömberg So you only have one light in the whole house?

    • @alexstromberg7696
      @alexstromberg7696 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Shayan ⁢ No but maybe my head is in front of the light?

    • @aaronstone360
      @aaronstone360 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +alex strömberg there nothing in your head though

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      alex strömberg You have only one light in your whole room?

  • @jacobwaltz4941
    @jacobwaltz4941 7 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    replace the sun with them

    • @BrunoIniesta
      @BrunoIniesta 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Internet with 480000ms of ping

    • @majkcan
      @majkcan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you talking about Internet Explorer? ;)

    • @jacobwaltz4941
      @jacobwaltz4941 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      majkcan i see what you did there

    • @Beezmantv
      @Beezmantv 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +MRwooshhh cause its too slow! u won't be able 2 stream shit!!

    • @greyjohnson4124
      @greyjohnson4124 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is it Slower it's still light

  • @thomaapie
    @thomaapie 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i would love a where are they now video to see if these things are still being developed or if they have been abandoned

  • @HadToChangeMyName_YoutubeSucks
    @HadToChangeMyName_YoutubeSucks 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like how the cameraman gets a closeup of the receiver, so everyone can see the magic happening.

  • @theworldeatswithyou
    @theworldeatswithyou 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    You know what's even more convenient? Regular Wifi.

    • @stuartkeating6508
      @stuartkeating6508 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      KNOWLEDGE!!!

    • @MikeTrieu
      @MikeTrieu 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sintech- - Tell me again, how many light bulbs do you have in your house? Do you really think LoS is really a problem when all the technology is is a flickering LED array?

    • @David-un4cs
      @David-un4cs 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Sintech- - Put them in the ceiling! It's even easier if you live in a small apartment for the landlords to put this in every room.

    • @ariochiv
      @ariochiv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Mike Trieu (MegasChara) Where are these light bulbs all over your house getting their signal from? What is the point of using Li-Fi if you have to wire your entire house with a high-speed network to feed the light bulbs in every room? And how do the receiving devices send signals back the light bulbs?

    • @MikeTrieu
      @MikeTrieu 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Arioch IV​​ Who said anything about another high-speed network? All you need to exchange is timing information on a periodic basis for TDMA signaling. You could achieve that with simple IEEE 802.15.4 (a.k.a. IoT) radios. As for transmitting from receiving devices, especially on mobile handsets, I'd imagine one could modulate the LED backlight on LCD-based displays or directly on AMOLED-based ones. If that turns out to be insufficient (not enough intensity), OEMs could integrate a dedicated Li-Fi LED array somewhere near the top of the device like some phones already do for IR blasters. It also doesn't have to be visible light, just invisible IR so as not to be totally annoying to nearby users.

  • @blackbirdnoodle9546
    @blackbirdnoodle9546 7 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    So if all of us use this Lifi...
    The earth will be the brightest planet...

  • @gabef9538
    @gabef9538 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was it 20 years away? How energy inefficient is it compared to both 3 parrellel wifi sources and lights combined? Does it work outside or will phones still nead wifi when siting outside of a building? Do windows letting in sunlight ruin it?

  • @martinavaslovik3433
    @martinavaslovik3433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Six years later I don't see this anywhere.

  • @TheMuseap
    @TheMuseap 8 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    The question is would it be able to go through walls?

    • @xXxDamageProxXx
      @xXxDamageProxXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      +Travis Younker NO.

    • @pfidze
      @pfidze 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +xXxDamageProxXx m8 calm down you dont need to tell off every single person, this guy is just trying to have a laugh

    • @xXxDamageProxXx
      @xXxDamageProxXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Tinman Pizza well if people watched the entire video, I'll be fine.

    • @pfidze
      @pfidze 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +xXxDamageProxXx just pick your fights carefully m8 your lucky im not a jerk and went berserk at you.

    • @xXxDamageProxXx
      @xXxDamageProxXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Tinman Pizza even if you did, I would have ignored you.

  • @austin1839
    @austin1839 7 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This is a great step forward in technology, but the world is still going to self destruct.

    • @connerdurocher192
      @connerdurocher192 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bet

    • @EH-ym6ep
      @EH-ym6ep 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      at least we can stream footage of the destruction with our lifi

    • @metaspherz
      @metaspherz 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      How did you arrive at that conclusion? The world/Earth can't possibly self-destruct. That's nonsense. Human civilization might eventually come to an end but the world will still be here until the sun goes nova or a much larger celestial object collides with it. But worlds just don't spontaneously self-destruct.

    • @tmartn4prison651
      @tmartn4prison651 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can see you take everything serious

    • @zudy9067
      @zudy9067 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      metaspherz Well what about we change "self destruct" to "evaporate"?
      or "faded"?
      black hole wont last forever.

  • @pegasusted2504
    @pegasusted2504 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It a good idea but it isn't the servers that would hold up things, it would be the transmission from the provider down the wires. It would only provide service indoors and at home.

  • @3mar00ss6
    @3mar00ss6 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    IT'S 2018 WHERE IS MY GODDAMN LIFI

  • @Skyefaux
    @Skyefaux 7 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    what what if there's a wall? or you cause a shadow? lol

    • @ll931217
      @ll931217 7 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Or a moth blocking the light

    • @gringojr1900
      @gringojr1900 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      you have a light in each room

    • @Skyefaux
      @Skyefaux 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm sure it could be figured out.

    • @OHHnoYOUdidntMAN
      @OHHnoYOUdidntMAN 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can have a router with a light in your closet with your photo-light detector hooked up to your (ultra) high-speed router and connect from your device to said router :)

    • @RtrTchRiews-jc1eq
      @RtrTchRiews-jc1eq 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Then why not use a cable?

  • @Axelsypkenssmit
    @Axelsypkenssmit 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I heard something about a chip that will manage batteries in such a way that you could charge your phone in 10 minutes in Netlinked daily yesterday (I think). Multiple phone manufactures and Tesla have shown interest. What do you know about this and are you doing a video on it?

    • @stroopwafelijzer
      @stroopwafelijzer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Axel sypkens smit Look up Storedot, they're developing a battery that can charge in 60 seconds. Really cool stuff that could boost the electric car market

    • @rashad5010
      @rashad5010 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Axel sypkens smit Graphene batteries?

    • @Tremor244
      @Tremor244 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Axel sypkens smit That must be the graphene thing isn't it?

    • @rappertvass8695
      @rappertvass8695 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Axel sypkens smit Graphene batteries if i'm correct?

  • @venkatbabu186
    @venkatbabu186 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is absolutely necessary for local management networks. Extreme high data plus quality.

  • @meng2704
    @meng2704 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As in the TED talk, if you block the light source from the receiver, it just interrupts the transmission of data. so it also means that the receiver must be installed outside of the device, or at least be exposed to the light source.

  • @LilSeven
    @LilSeven 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    so instead of a W, we get an L... 🤔🤔🤔

  • @kastertalkie4093
    @kastertalkie4093 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    so, you mean I can use 10 GB data with an led bulb but my phone must be underneath it. right?

    • @kevshorty
      @kevshorty 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wouldn't be hard in a city where there are lights everywhere. My guess is even street lamps that light up cities, towns and highways would have Lifi technology built into it

    • @bone9jdjkaye
      @bone9jdjkaye 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      no... it means you can have super fast internet that you must be connected to, not 10gb data... also Kev - they could use other means to transfer the internet signals once li-fi has done it. its speed not quantity

    • @savagekando4677
      @savagekando4677 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It doesn't work you can receive data but can't transmit.So you will need a big light on you'r phone to send data back and a receptor everywhere in the room to recive you'r data back , and in the light of a day this Li-Fi doesn't work !

    • @wlog2610
      @wlog2610 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      U wouldn't be able to see the light.

  • @brettknoss486
    @brettknoss486 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    One big advatntage could be connecting lights with the seme data infrastructre. This would reduce the amount of wiring in a building.

  • @luckyuche
    @luckyuche ปีที่แล้ว +4

    7 years later. What's happened with this idea?

  • @kentballweg
    @kentballweg 8 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Put your phone into the pocket and the connection is dead

    • @Peter-lt3ey
      @Peter-lt3ey 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      my point exactly

    • @whateveryh2119
      @whateveryh2119 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maybe it just me, but don't people typically use the internet OUTSIDE of their pockets?
      Okay, nvm. I think you have a point, you wouldn't be able to take skype calls, listen to music with your phone in your pocket etc.

    • @kentballweg
      @kentballweg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alicia Kankainen neither would you receive any email or other messages while your phone is in your pocket

    • @whateveryh2119
      @whateveryh2119 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Vincent Oak Yeah, though I don't think that will be as big of a deal. If the internet speed is so extremely fast you would receive the message basically as soon as you pick your phone up.
      You wouldn't be able to get a *ping* sound though, which will kind of suck. Perhaps they'll come up with some solution for this pocket problem.

    • @kentballweg
      @kentballweg 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alicia Kankainen this is a really impractical way of doing things
      There are more practical solutions that will drive this one into the great pit of forgotten lame ideas

  • @corthew
    @corthew 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    He puts his hand between the receiver and the light source and the signal is blocked.
    That's not a success.
    Now, were he to put his hand between them and have the receiver still be able to detect the pulses from ambient light I may consider that a success.
    Basically, you have to have the optics of the receiver in direct LOS to the source for this to work.
    That's not a step up from Wi-Fi.

    • @berliandro
      @berliandro 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      light is spreading and can go through man's hand or finger. So even he blocks the detector, the light still can be absorbed by the detector

    • @corthew
      @corthew 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rainbow Pepe And yet it was not the case in this video

    • @tmartn4prison651
      @tmartn4prison651 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because li-fi was only coming from that light only he even said it. if he had it on all the lights in the room then there wouldn't be a problem.

    • @Mancub2b
      @Mancub2b 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      corthew u could use it for downloads and uploads tho

    • @djpansetas6861
      @djpansetas6861 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      iam a bit late but i thing the receiver is build inside the lamp so nothing can blocked it.The creator at the event just demonstrated the way it works.

  • @robertpalumbo9089
    @robertpalumbo9089 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    yea the banshee is an alarm radio that picks up visible light and makes noise if exposed to any light for safes and any closed black room

  • @shinjisan2015
    @shinjisan2015 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    All electromagnetic waves (radio, light etc) move at the same speed in air... the speed of light. The difference is the frequency of the wave, that is how many peaks and troughs in a second. Each peak and trough can be used to signal on/off or digital states depending on the translators. On/off is binary, the basis of electronic communication, and a single "bit". So, the higher the frequency, the more bits per second can be transmitted. The issue isn't the transfer medium, it's the translators on either end. Mainstream WiFi uses 2.4GHz and 5GHz signals... which have the theoretical maximum throughput of 2.4 Gigabits per second and 5 Gigabits per second. Yes, LiFi can reach HUNDREDS of Gigabits per second in testing, but the translators on either end are still the bottleneck.
    Think of it as your water supply to your house. The very large mains water pipeline running through the neighbourhood does gigalitres of water per hour. But, your tap can only do tens of litres per hour.

  • @user-np7kr4wx7g
    @user-np7kr4wx7g 8 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    how would you upload something using Li fi though

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +t800 Just like you do on a WiFi, wheres the problem?

    • @user-np7kr4wx7g
      @user-np7kr4wx7g 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Shayan ⁢ well if I've understood correctly Lifi transfers data through light, so would i need a light on lets say my phone to upload data

    • @shayan_ecksdee
      @shayan_ecksdee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      t800 Hmm, true. Maybe thats why he said lifi wont completely replace wifi

    • @stroopwafelijzer
      @stroopwafelijzer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You'd need another light at the receiving end to send things back and a receiver somewhere that's also connected to the internet.

    • @CMDR_John_Crichton
      @CMDR_John_Crichton 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      +Fuzz944 Good idea, but I think the process of flickering a phone's screen at the rate described in the video would be murder on the battery.

  • @dev1458
    @dev1458 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    watch dogs might actually be a reality soon

  • @KyleTO7
    @KyleTO7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I could imagine tiny boxes that beam our phones light like an NFC tag and downloads all of our videos at once so we can enjoy them on the go.

  • @whatadag3748
    @whatadag3748 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So lights on everywhere? Including daytime?

  • @TuhinBagh
    @TuhinBagh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Meanwhile average Joe in India is getting 512kbps :/
    *sighs*

    • @ManavGharat
      @ManavGharat 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      LMAO

    • @adityaravishankar8344
      @adityaravishankar8344 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** I get 64mbps
      Act

    • @TuhinBagh
      @TuhinBagh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Aditya Ravishankar "Average" Indians..
      not all are well fortuned nor their local ISP has the infrastructure to run fibernet.
      Dam! 64mbps though :/ Lucky bastard!

    • @JackalGYT
      @JackalGYT 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Tuhin Bagh I get 150 Mbps

    • @rateater420
      @rateater420 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I get 260 kbps

  • @S7r1k3r581
    @S7r1k3r581 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    but what about shadows?

    • @applepie55555
      @applepie55555 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch 3:50

    • @JaceW22
      @JaceW22 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Clemens Steinbauer It's an advantage and disadvantage.
      People living next door or standing outside won't be able use your li-fi. But you just have to make sure you don't block the signal, which shouldn't be a problem if your transmitter is on the ceiling.
      Either way, if you block the li-fi signal , then I'm sure that a shadow won't mean total signal loss. Light bounces off walls and objects into where the shadow is. That's why a shadow isn't completely black. There is still some light getting to the shadow, just at a lower intensity. The signal should still get there then but your internet speed may just decrease a bit.

    • @dausdk
      @dausdk 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Jyson AW the problem i can see from this thing is, you cant use the internet. only for data transfer , try think , bulb give light to your phone(with light receptor) . but then, how the phone want to interact with the bulb? for example you want to open youtube, you must send request for youtube website, and if no request can be done, how the phone want to open youtube website? unless the bulb have light receptor too, and receive the light that phone created. the logic solve problem for me is , to combine Wi-fi and Li-fi . wifi for request, lifi for receiving data. what do you think?

    • @dausdk
      @dausdk 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      M. de k.
      if you want to open youtube website, you must request for it , so you need to upload the request to the server to be processed, then you will be downloading the data that been sended by the server . You understand how (download and upload kb/second) concept right? as you can see, the bulb cant receive your uploaded data since there is other way to do it.

    • @dausdk
      @dausdk 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok you dont understand what im trying to say. okay , if i dont put my phone in my pocket, and the phone is under LiFi bulb, still i can do the uploading data process?

  • @catastrxphic3248
    @catastrxphic3248 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Intro to me sounds like your watching confusingtv then i realized its coldfusion lol

  • @gavinkemp7920
    @gavinkemp7920 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the limitation of IoT wasn't band with these sensor transfer individually fairly little data. the issue is more IPv4 and data aggregation.

  • @AverageLaur
    @AverageLaur 7 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    oh lol im the 40%> enhternet users

    • @gaminggamer4534
      @gaminggamer4534 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Guaranteed more faster than any of the technology he mentioned.

    • @durrantmiller8810
      @durrantmiller8810 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      More faster xD

    • @manutrollolol
      @manutrollolol 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isnt Ethernet the private network in a (big) company, for example Google? To transfer data between HQ which nobody else should see

    • @orpheus..
      @orpheus.. 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +ManuTrollolol Nope. That's an INTRANET.
      Ethernet is just a fancy way of saying "interconnected by cable", but most people are unaware of this and use the term completely wrong. xD

    • @manutrollolol
      @manutrollolol 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh okay, thanks! I heard Intranet before, mixed it up ^^

  • @DrXaOs
    @DrXaOs 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    the next big thing: DARK FI!

  • @TheOnlyEpsilonAlpha
    @TheOnlyEpsilonAlpha 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder when this will come to market and i'm curious if the you can "read" the transmitted data over a scope from far away ....

  • @smrafisultan
    @smrafisultan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    did a similar presentation for college seminar 5 years ago, and development's still in same stages

  • @AMalas
    @AMalas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    WOW! NOW I CAN PLACE 3937101 SPECIAL LIGHTS FOR INTERNET! AND IF MY SHADOW BLOCKS THE SENSOR I WONT GET ANY RECEPTION!! I ALSO CAN ONLY RECEIVE BIT NEVER SEND!!! BUT AS LONG AS IT DELIVERS WHAT EVER THAT NUMBER WAS IM IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Said no one ever... just use optical fiber in the office for high speeds Aaaaand you're sorted!

    • @brandonwiebe2647
      @brandonwiebe2647 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You don't use "special lights" and you only need like 1 light per room looool

    • @chikeezebilo6545
      @chikeezebilo6545 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looool. About the sending bits part... I never even considered that.. The lights need to be special if you want to send bits.

    • @32Rats
      @32Rats 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      that'd why in cold fusions comment he said they would work together more likely then not

    • @zakiNBG
      @zakiNBG 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Anas Malas you could also just have more than one light per room to make sure you dont block off your connection with your hand or anything else.

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has advantages but yes wifi will still be a thing for being more accessible.

  • @damienharrison1
    @damienharrison1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    But how do you upload using this? Using normal wi-fi?
    EDIT: Thinking about it again, I don't think a phone will be able to upload using li-fi, and it's the data you send (searches, passwords, naked selfies, bank details etc.) that needs to be protected more than downloads. So I just can't see how this can be more secure than wi-fi.

    • @racso5628
      @racso5628 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm thinking that there would just need to be a receiver and your phone would have an LED display (so amoled and such). The phone would need the ability to pulse incredibly quickly which would be done using MEMS (unless current technology can already switch fast enough).

    • @Archivecollections
      @Archivecollections 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Oscar Conroy (Racso562) yeah, but smartphones are in our pockets? I think no light will be transferred in to our pockets? So how are they gonna solve that problem?

    • @racso5628
      @racso5628 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +HDPhotography Ah! I see what you mean now. That's a good point. I think this tech would add to WiFi, but not replace it. WiFi would still be the best option for uploading from our pockets.

    • @Archivecollections
      @Archivecollections 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Oscar Conroy (Racso562) that's the same thought I had about Li-fi, it's just gonna be a great add-on for the WiFi maybe like desktops that are constantly in the same position or something similar

    • @damienharrison1
      @damienharrison1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** I said "more secure"... meaning: how can it be more secure than wi-fi.

  • @kosmiken
    @kosmiken 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are there any new updates you could tell us about? I am sure there had to be something between Nob of '15 and now.

  • @123Dragonden
    @123Dragonden 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wonder what the range on that Li-Fi is.

    • @circuit10
      @circuit10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As far as light goes

  • @summushieremiasclarkson4700
    @summushieremiasclarkson4700 7 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    So many fucking issues with this. UHF penetration, attenuation, reliability, interference to name a few. There's a reason IF is confined to straight line beam systems.

    • @markolukic8517
      @markolukic8517 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      UltimateXtreme u can say same thing for radio waves but we still use them , if your eyes could see radio waves you would see a soup of random bullshit

    • @koukouvania
      @koukouvania 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      UltimateXtreme what's IF please?

    • @mirek190
      @mirek190 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      marko lukić light has externally shot wave in nanometers ... ( Normal wifi had around 20 cm wave ) don't know how I will be works in movement ....

  • @abrvalg321
    @abrvalg321 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Have you ever heard about optic cables?

    • @kalebbruwer
      @kalebbruwer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes, but you're gonna lose connection to the server every time there is something between your device and the lightbulb.
      Any gamer can be driven to rage quitting if their game freezes every few minutes.

    • @selareid
      @selareid 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kaleb Bruwer if you put a while room with these lights the light will get to the receiver if you don't place anything on top of the receiver

    • @abrvalg321
      @abrvalg321 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This tech works in a very specific and rare environment. It has all the disadvantages of optic cable and wifi + can't do anything withh walls or coners.

    • @kalebbruwer
      @kalebbruwer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This tech is too sensitive. The reason we use radio signals is because it is a more robust system.

    • @Manuel-cz7mz
      @Manuel-cz7mz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Константин Войнов "Mum, go away! You stand between me and the Lifirouter!

  • @Long-do1vj
    @Long-do1vj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Needing very direct unimpeded visible line of sight is a huge weakness. This is a very neat trick to perform in a controlled experiment, but impossible to deploy in actual use cases. This is never gonna leave the lab until the weakness is overcome.

  • @MrNickb-s500
    @MrNickb-s500 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey thanks! This is excellent info!