Tap to unmute

AI Deception: How Tech Companies Are Fooling Us

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ค. 2024
  • Visit our sponsor aura.com/coldfusion to get started on a 2-week free trial and see where your personal information is being sold online.
    AI is everywhere. Is it all it's cracked up to be or is it one big scam? Well, as it is for most things, the truth is somewhere in the middle. In this episode we see how, despite some of AI's useful contributions, the hype has also impacted the tech industry negatively.
    Sources: docs.google.com/document/d/1V...
    Excerpt on AI in laptops provided by Just Josh: / justjoshtech
    ColdFusion Podcast:
    / @throughtheweb
    ColdFusion Music:
    / @burnwatermusic7421
    burnwater.bandcamp.com
    Get my book:
    bit.ly/NewThinkingbook
    ColdFusion Socials:
    / discord
    / coldfusiontv
    / coldfusion_tv
    / coldfusiontv
    Producer: Dagogo Altraide, Tawsif Akkas
    Writers: Dagogo Altraide, Tawsif Akkas
    Editors: Tanzim Uddin, Brayden Laffrey
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 4.1K

  • @Emperor_Shao_Kahn
    @Emperor_Shao_Kahn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5667

    thinking AI is doing your self checkouts and then finding out its just 1000 people in India watching the cameras 24/7 sounds like a good south park episode

    • @AaAa-je5eo
      @AaAa-je5eo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      🤣😅

    • @mafiousbj
      @mafiousbj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      Go read about the UHRS. Your search engine algorithm is being "trained" the same way 😂

    • @harrisbuild
      @harrisbuild 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +427

      AI : Actually Indians

    • @blantant
      @blantant 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      Lmfao 😂 ​@@harrisbuild

    • @kuddybeef777
      @kuddybeef777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Frr

  • @Radhaugo108
    @Radhaugo108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +845

    Imagine buying an AI Sex Bot only to find out that it is just some guy back in India.

    • @toasty2263
      @toasty2263 หลายเดือนก่อน +171

      "hello sir, kindly remove your pants"

    • @CBrown
      @CBrown หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I'd rather not. 😖

    • @blanne9628
      @blanne9628 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      "kindly remove your pants. we will then do some things parelly"

    • @Radhaugo108
      @Radhaugo108 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@blanne9628 jajaja

    • @prathm87
      @prathm87 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      😂🤣

  • @clairebaldwin8733
    @clairebaldwin8733 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1035

    AI has replaced between 60-100 people from the company I currently work for... And complaints from clients have increased..... Great informative video. Thanks 😊

    • @jensenraylight8011
      @jensenraylight8011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

      lol, Go AI go Broke

    • @Matanumi
      @Matanumi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Of course they have- company is dumb for thinking the transition would've been smooth

    • @LeoVital
      @LeoVital 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      AI will improve considerably in a very short timespan. Humans won't. This is a moot point. It's akin to looking at the first cars and saying "Look, when they crash there's a far higher chance to die than if you just have an accident with a horse!".

    • @jensenraylight8011
      @jensenraylight8011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LeoVital and? the goal of those companies is to make AI Autonomous,
      they're not planned on making people to operate AI? because what the point of that when AI can Generate Prompt and keep churning stuff without needing input from anyone.
      it's like an assembly line
      you're the victim as well, and UBI won't come because it's a financial suicide.
      without a job or money, are you prepared to sleep on concrete?

    • @jensenraylight8011
      @jensenraylight8011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

      @@LeoVital and? the goal of those companies is to make AI Autonomous,
      they're not planned on making people to operate AI,
      because what the point of that when AI can Generate Prompt and keep churning stuff without needing input from anyone.
      it's like an assembly line
      it's more like those companies are generous to give you a Toy AI for free, so that you kept being open minded about AI and won't mind if you'll get erased by them in the future.
      you're the victim as well, and UBI won't come because it's a financial suicide.
      without a job or money, are you prepared to sleep on concrete?

  • @ClearVista
    @ClearVista 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +163

    I say an advert of either Twitter or Reddit yesterday by Samsung stating that their new vacuum cleaner, not an automated one like a Roomba but a handheld one, used AI. It's a handheld vacuum cleaner.

    • @SalkisRe
      @SalkisRe หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @Quilt4Joy
      @Quilt4Joy หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      There are AI toothbrushes available too. 😂. Correct me if I am wrong, but all toothbrushes are hand held.

    • @zadekeys2194
      @zadekeys2194 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Ai = Another Indian 🤣🤣🤣

    • @Vysair
      @Vysair หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Quilt4Joy oclean (xiaomi) toothbrush have the mi band watch screen lol

  • @HieuNguyen-nb2cm
    @HieuNguyen-nb2cm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1715

    I work in an aerospace MRO company and the marketing team is now labelling EVERYTHING a computer in our company does as “AI powered”…
    Literally techs that existed decades ago (FEA simulation, self-filling forms, automated tool management system, data analytics tool, etc) is now “AI powered” just because they r jumping on the trend.
    Management is now even encouraging engineers to consult chatgpt for our calculations… while i know for a fact it cant even convert some units correctly.
    This is ridiculous

    • @robertmusil1107
      @robertmusil1107 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've used ChatGPT for some summaries on scientific sources and the same with Bard. They literally invent sources that do not exist... No idea how someone can trust those things.

    • @dbkwow
      @dbkwow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

      Indeed, LLMs are prone to factual hallucinations and should never be used for complex calculations

    • @InfinitesimalInfinity
      @InfinitesimalInfinity 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      Recently I came across the term "Generative AI based design solutions" which is nothing but good old topological optimization.

    • @TBolt1
      @TBolt1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      Are you making parts for Boeing, by chance? 😅

    • @HieuNguyen-nb2cm
      @HieuNguyen-nb2cm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@TBolt1 no haha we deal with maintenance and spare part installations, so after-market stuffs.

  • @hellfire5108
    @hellfire5108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2697

    What surprises me the most is the fact that Amazon was trying these "walk out" stores in the US where people already perfected this type of shopping.

    • @LazyDaisyDay88
      @LazyDaisyDay88 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

      🤣

    • @jean-marcducommun8185
      @jean-marcducommun8185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

      Hard to beat that one!

    • @StallionStudios1234
      @StallionStudios1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

      Especially in New York now lol.

    • @danielabbey7726
      @danielabbey7726 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

      The old "five finger discount". 😂

    • @MyroGem
      @MyroGem 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      This is gold 😂😂😂

  • @digiryde
    @digiryde 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    In the 1970s and 1980s, it could have been said that computers would not replace accountants, bu accountants who use computers would replace those who do not.

    • @wnose
      @wnose 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Not far from the truth... Excel reduced the burden of manual calculations and sped up turnaround.

    • @aalaptube
      @aalaptube วันที่ผ่านมา

      An ex-colleague has this as his WhasApp status: AI will not replace you, but people using AI will. And just last year he had a bet with me that AI will replace highly skilled complex jobs in 5 years. Its funny how in a year, he downgraded the statement.
      I have come to understand this, as hunans of the modern society, we get sucked up in hype quickly, and slowly realize the facts.

  • @stefanc4520
    @stefanc4520 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    "Oh no! Not a 225K fine for literal fraud!"
    SEC is a joke🤡🤡🤡

    • @BusyAir
      @BusyAir 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      On point with your literal vocabulary

    • @stefanc4520
      @stefanc4520 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      @@BusyAir what? Is English your first language cause that sentence makes no sense to the context at hand 🫥

    • @robertarmstrong3024
      @robertarmstrong3024 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      When you create a government agency to enforce and regulate big corporations, all you create are extremely rich regulators.

  • @dahawk8574
    @dahawk8574 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2059

    "Full Self Driving"
    ...actually just some dude halfway around the world remotely turning your steering wheel.

    • @FrotLopOfficial
      @FrotLopOfficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

      Thats exactly what Waymo is doing as we speak.

    • @petersmangalisongoma2013
      @petersmangalisongoma2013 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Yep, FOOL self driving is exactly like that

    • @Carnold_YT
      @Carnold_YT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

      And that dude is used to driving on the other side of the road.

    • @ze2411
      @ze2411 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      lollllll

    • @gavinbalajadia8697
      @gavinbalajadia8697 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      I know this is a joke. But have you used FSD?

  • @b-art6098
    @b-art6098 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1243

    I worked for an accounting company from France that used hundreds of cheap laborer from Madagascar to manually input data from photos of actual bills people uploaded believing it’s OCR. Nowhere they mentioned it’s all done manually.

    • @prestonr6348
      @prestonr6348 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

      Wait isn't OCR old technology? You can upload your receipt to GPT-4/Claude 3 and its vision features can extract receipt data.

    • @b-art6098
      @b-art6098 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@prestonr6348 I don't know what they are doing now, this was in 2022.

    • @hotdog77189
      @hotdog77189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@prestonr6348 its not good enough for 100% coverage

    • @b-art6098
      @b-art6098 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@prestonr6348 I worked for them in 2022. I don't know what they are doing now.

    • @San-pv
      @San-pv 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      damn thats so personal

  • @DanteTheAbyssalBeing
    @DanteTheAbyssalBeing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +313

    Cleaning toilets for a living might be the shittiest job I've ever had, but at least AI is unlikely to replace me.

    • @MBunn-uf1we
      @MBunn-uf1we 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

      "introducing, the self cleaning toilet!"

    • @DanteTheAbyssalBeing
      @DanteTheAbyssalBeing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      @@MBunn-uf1we Even the robots wouldn't touch some of the things I've had to scrape off a crapper 😂

    • @MargaritaMagdalena
      @MargaritaMagdalena 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I work full time as a dishwasher at a big restaurant. I can never be replaced by a machine or AI. Feels good.

    • @hashtagunderscore3173
      @hashtagunderscore3173 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@MargaritaMagdalena I know what you mean. My job requires typing up reports on computers, cutting grass, picking up stuff and other things that will never be replaced by AI. Until we get actual androids.

    • @MargaritaMagdalena
      @MargaritaMagdalena 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@hashtagunderscore3173 Yes, there's more to a job than its secsyness. Doing a job that can't be done by a machine or AI is secsy too.

  • @6wild6flower6
    @6wild6flower6 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Sir I would like to point out a misconception in this video. In any given company 3 people in a group don't output 3 peoples worth of work. 1 person in the group produces 2.5 while one of the other two gets promoted for their hard work and manager skills.

  • @theroysombrero7392
    @theroysombrero7392 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4597

    Let's not forget, Mark Cuban was 100% all-in on NFT's and defended $43 million Bored Ape prices.

    • @AGILISFPV
      @AGILISFPV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

      This ^^^^^

    • @jimj2683
      @jimj2683 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +388

      Mark Cuban is an awkward clown.

    • @DanKeeley
      @DanKeeley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      😂

    • @wildpants9347
      @wildpants9347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +287

      What's crazy is that he still defends it. I feel bad for those who blindly trust billionaires and end up betting their house on such stupid things

    • @sandyj342
      @sandyj342 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mark is a fraud

  • @rad4924
    @rad4924 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1997

    Wait, Amazon did something dishonest and unethical!? Gosh that's so out of character for them...

    • @caro.caro.9578
      @caro.caro.9578 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Right?!!!

    • @KaiserV-2
      @KaiserV-2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Damn, this must be a one time occurrence! I doubt it would ever happen again, they are obviously the must trustworthy company in the world.

    • @brendenklein784
      @brendenklein784 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Am I the only one that refuses to support their business model? I feel like every other door has 1-2 packages from them every day.

    • @leonvolq6179
      @leonvolq6179 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Shhh Bezos is listening!

    • @zwerko
      @zwerko 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pssssh... Amazon doesn't give people jobs, Amazon bad. Amazon gives people jobs, Amazon bad. Can't they do anything to please you people? Leave Britney Alone!

  • @oompalumpus699
    @oompalumpus699 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    In my country, there are literally freelancer jobs where you identify text in an image and put it in a document.
    I looked into the company paying for these freelancers and they market their service as 'AI-powered' image to text conversion.

    • @neon9165
      @neon9165 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats an image annotator job, It'S the same thing the "Amazon check out ai is just 1000 indians" is based on, It IS Training an AI / ML Model, You are Annotating Images for their MAchine learning algorithm so it can Eventually do it solely by itself, reliably.
      GPT 4 by openai was annotated by thousands of kenyans but the company they used now shut down because OpenAI can now use GPT 4 to annotate things for GPT 5 after reaching the performance threshold of a "low skilled worker"

    • @SimonsRandomRants
      @SimonsRandomRants 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Wow. Hmm privacy issues?

    • @humbleindian6303
      @humbleindian6303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      In a US university a PhD scholar submitted her university PhD thesis , after a month she was fined and lost her degree for plagiarism, She had used Chat-GPT to write her thesis

    • @jeremywest3786
      @jeremywest3786 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      isn't that data classification for training AI models? AI needs to be trained off of verified data. People need to say "this is a cat" thousands of times for an AI to recognise what a cat is. Although identifying text is a bit of a rudimentary task at this time

    • @billy6044
      @billy6044 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not ai, Al,
      It’s short for Alan.

  • @neorock6135
    @neorock6135 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Forget jobs, AI is an existential threat to humanity

    • @KerythDraws
      @KerythDraws 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Why? It's not real intelligence, it's a mechanical probability prediction modeler. It's not magic and it's not sentient.

  • @bolle666
    @bolle666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2798

    Just wait until they find out that every Alexa actually has a tiny person in it.

    • @syloui
      @syloui 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

      Actually yes, it was third world interpreters. Look it up

    • @CourageToGroww
      @CourageToGroww 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      Smurfette with a megaphone

    • @Window4503
      @Window4503 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Black Mirror had an episode proposing something similar lol

    • @carsongabriel1949
      @carsongabriel1949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      😅😅😅😅😅😂😂

    • @paulolaniyi7875
      @paulolaniyi7875 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂😂😂

  • @washingtonradio
    @washingtonradio 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +703

    My problem with AI is it is fundamental a statistical model based on large amounts of data. The key is the quality of the data initially used and used to update the model. It doesn't actually think in any real sense of the word. AI is very susceptible to "Garbage in, garbage out".

    • @herp_derpingson
      @herp_derpingson 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      How are humans any different? Garbage in, garbage out applies for humans too.

    • @rdm5547
      @rdm5547 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Correct! AI is just a statistical predictor.

    • @rdm5547
      @rdm5547 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      ​@@herp_derpingsongarbage in and garbage out humans are useless for business and productivity. Similarly, AI is useless if it generates rough output but at the bottom a disclaimer is written "Generated results may not be accurate". AI is also useless if it gives garbage out for garbage in.

    • @michaelbarbarelli3764
      @michaelbarbarelli3764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True dat.

    • @randomuserame
      @randomuserame 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      As shown by AI projects that ended up being racist. The good old Chan of 4 figured out decades ago that these things are only as good as the information they're served. Back then it was just chat bots, but the same principle applies.
      They're not sentient, so all of what they are is based on what we tell it to be.

  • @Mageroeth
    @Mageroeth 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This has been my feeling from the start i work in tech and i found zero use cases outside of writing python scripts i had no need of.

  • @vess889
    @vess889 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Misleading info regarding Microsoft firing blizzard employees. It has nothing to do with ai, it always happens when company acquires another company. When one company buys another one, they usually restructure and layoffs happen. Also, when Microsoft announced they will buy Blizzard, it had 9.2k employees, while during acquisition it had 13k.

  • @sturmeko
    @sturmeko 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +554

    The biggest sign we are in a bubble is experts saying we are not in the bubble.

    • @Tubeytime
      @Tubeytime 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I don't know if that's how it actually works but you got my upvote

    • @VivekChandra007
      @VivekChandra007 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Yes, same thing happened during Dot Com rise also.

    • @vito7pt
      @vito7pt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​Too much leverage from cheap money.
      ​@@Tubeytime

    • @KevanMajere33
      @KevanMajere33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So, building on your argument Sturmeko, what is the scenario that we are not in a bubble?

    • @kmhkennedy
      @kmhkennedy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@KevanMajere33when the experts say we are in a bubble, then we’re in a cube.

  • @ReimuTukishiro
    @ReimuTukishiro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +366

    When an industry focus on announcing eye-catching gimmicks rather than trying to solve the long-standing, fundamental problems(like instability and hallucination) of the technologies itself, you know this is a total scam.

    • @omegahaxors3306
      @omegahaxors3306 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      This is true of all computer dev. If something is a buggy mess and they just keep announcing new features, it's because the project has no intentions of ever releasing.

    • @chrismay2298
      @chrismay2298 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly. Look at the world using Microsoft OS when it's more broken every update... LOL

    • @nateb.1276
      @nateb.1276 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wow, incredible take! no one ever thought of that!

    • @Jonas-Seiler
      @Jonas-Seiler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      because those are fundamentally unsolvable

    • @humbleindian6303
      @humbleindian6303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In a US university a PhD scholar submitted her university PhD thesis , after a month she was fined and lost her degree for plagiarism, She had used Chat-GPT to write her thesis

  • @prz98
    @prz98 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    “AI” in 20’s is what “Smart” was in 10’s.
    Most Smart appliances weren’t smarter than their “regular” equivalents, they just had app/internet connectivity, some didn’t get even that and it was just a name. Now “AI” vacuums and fridges meet the same fate. At best they get same functionality ‘now with chatbot’-way, for the rest it’s just a fancy name.

    • @Colddirector
      @Colddirector 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I remember my mum getting me a google home around 2016. It was neat being able to talk to it and get news/music back for a while, but then the novelty wore off and I stopped. It was just faster and easier to find music and look up news myself, heck a bedside radio - something that's existed for closing in a century now, can do the latter better.

    • @jamesaritchie1
      @jamesaritchie1 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not true at all.

  • @LucaStanga-ww4pm
    @LucaStanga-ww4pm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    A friend of mine is an electronic engineer with +30 years experience, so he started working with paper and pencil.
    He once told me :"now with a computer I can do in a few hours what once would have taken me days of work,
    but I still have to stay at the office 8 hours every day".
    I don't know what's gonna happen with the job market, but one thing's for sure. The rise in productivity is goign to go all in the pockets of the proprietors.

    • @user-bm4yf6td7d
      @user-bm4yf6td7d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What did you mean? your friend says that the computer allows him to do work in a few hours, but he deliberately does not use the computer? does he use pen and paper instead? so he increases his time in the office?

    • @Jonas-Seiler
      @Jonas-Seiler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      just there's not gonna be a rise in productivity with this one

    • @LucaStanga-ww4pm
      @LucaStanga-ww4pm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@user-bm4yf6td7d I mean that legal full-time job contracts require a person to work 8 hours a day back then as much as they do today.
      On the other hand productivity has increased enormously because of the advent of the computer. Just compare doing multiplications on paper to doing it with a spreadsheet.
      So the point is that even though you produce much more wealth through labor nowadays thanks to computers, the daily routine of the average worker hasn't changed, 9 to 5 it was and 9 to 5 it still is.

    • @morpheas768
      @morpheas768 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Absolutely.
      It all serves big tech interests. All of these gains, as it has been traditionally, go for the expansion and benefit of the company and its shareholders, and not the workers themselves.
      This trend was established decades ago, before computers were even close to going mainstream.
      Either enjoy serving them, or rise against it and change this corrupt socio-economic system.
      I think the masses have already made their choice, even if naively.

    • @ncedwards1234
      @ncedwards1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@morpheas768
      Choices are illusion of control over the behaviors we engage in based on our environments. Environment is changing, behaviors will change, the perception of choice is awakening, and the environment too will change as a result. Always been the loop as long as perception has been around, and the loop doesn't actually require perception, that's just the fun bit we enjoy as humans. But i get what you mean by choice, so to speak your language in a more generous way: yeah, we made a choice, but the conditions have changed and so our minds can change in response. It'll be a tense transition, but an inevitable one. Stay strong fellow human.

  • @gustavludwig9719
    @gustavludwig9719 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +291

    so AI stands for “All Indians”,huh?😅

    • @waynevanrensburg8037
      @waynevanrensburg8037 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Only two comments? 😂Best comment I’ve seen

    • @SimonsRandomRants
      @SimonsRandomRants 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Man this comment deserves a few thousand more likes

    • @jasonhaven7170
      @jasonhaven7170 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SimonsRandomRants You know the youtuber is Black?

    • @prithvirajmahamulkar2831
      @prithvirajmahamulkar2831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

    • @RedMambaYard
      @RedMambaYard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂

  • @nyx211
    @nyx211 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +849

    I worked with a company offering AI-powered coding services. While their AI models worked well 85%-90% of the time, it still wasn't good enough on its own. The models would hallucinate small, but important details that made the code unable to compile or unsafe to run. This meant that *all* of the code had to be manually reviewed, edited, or rewritten. It wouldn't surprise me if some executive decided to replace all of their developers with AI, realized that he screwed up, and then rehired people to do most of the work they were doing before under the guise of "supervising the AI".

    • @dk109k2dask9
      @dk109k2dask9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

      I think the point is that you can replace 5 juniors software engineers with 1 senior software engineer

    • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
      @paulmichaelfreedman8334 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      AI is not ready yet to replace humans where it comes down to language and rational/logical reasoning. Even GPT-5 may not cut it, as it remains an input-output system.

    • @TheManinBlack9054
      @TheManinBlack9054 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What company? What software? Any data to back that up?

    • @horseradish843
      @horseradish843 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

      @@dk109k2dask9 I very much doubt that. LLMs struggle with basic logic. Often the error they make, render the code completely useless since its just the wrong approach.

    • @willie1genesis714
      @willie1genesis714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dk109k2dask9 short term it works however, not having fail safes makes that 1 senior position dangerous due to... 1. being overworked, creating more opportunities to overlook mistakes/make them. 2. consolidation of all that work makes replacements harder to come by, meaning if someone quit for higher wages the replacement will most likely be worse due to starting salary being lower, and needing to learn everything. .... It honestly feels like AI in the long run if used for corporate gains only will be a mechanism of enshittification of the cogitive experince of work... and if left for long enough people will forgot what good service was... and accept.

  • @YTChiefCritic
    @YTChiefCritic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    More machines = less humans. When one of the creators of AI says that they could realistically 'take over', then it's time to curb this technology nightmare before we destroy ourselves.

  • @StarNumbers
    @StarNumbers หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Very nice. AI is creating holes in the commercial processes rather than leveraging them up. For example, customer service is suddenly weak or non-existent. The company managers expect some form of AI to step in but it is not happening. I've just returned a second tablet because I could not get problems resolved. It seems as if the quality testing people just vanished. It seems that I the customer should apply the resources and fix the problems with the product I just purchased. NO, my expectation is to have a working product as promised!

  • @user-im8gv6eh2y
    @user-im8gv6eh2y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +400

    Incidentally, Amazon operates a crowdsourcing platform called Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    • @tomaitoe
      @tomaitoe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      The jokes write themselves...

    • @StallionStudios1234
      @StallionStudios1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      LOLZ

    • @noa670
      @noa670 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I thought the same thing about Amazon, kinda sketchy

    • @roe_
      @roe_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      I thought this was a joke but it's actually real.

    • @pvshka
      @pvshka 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@roe_ lmao same

  • @laurencevanhelsuwe3052
    @laurencevanhelsuwe3052 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +368

    The older one becomes, the more it seems that most big business involves lying, manipulation.. even fraud.

    • @lukethompson5558
      @lukethompson5558 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yup

    • @Garryck-1
      @Garryck-1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      Congratulations.. you're starting to catch on!

    • @rohitandley
      @rohitandley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's the game if you want success. Otherwise its best to remain silent

    • @vulpes122
      @vulpes122 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep, capitalism is mostly about exporting the work to 3rd world countries that pay less and then using psychology to trick people into buying an overpriced product that they very likely dont need in the 1st world.

    • @mecanuktutorials6476
      @mecanuktutorials6476 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @user-wn2pv5qb5pmaturity. Realizing that even though everyone around you buys into the mirage, doesn’t mean it’s really there.
      Emperor’s New Clothes situation everywhere around us.

  • @avd2111
    @avd2111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Amazon AI : hello u have purchased toilet seat last week would u like to buy it again....

  • @jinh817
    @jinh817 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    My job is rolling out AI, but the outpost has to be manually reviewed and the AI will have to be constantly updated anytime time there’s a change (we have changes all the time). The older leadership teams just get so excited about AI not understanding all the manual work required.
    Maybe it will get better, but it’s not ready at the moment.

  • @chri5wyd367
    @chri5wyd367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +331

    So Amazon just took local jobs and outsourced them under the guise of "AI/Progress."
    Shocker.

    • @omegahaxors3306
      @omegahaxors3306 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The only thing real about AI is how it's been used to fuck over the working class.

    • @davidbatista1183
      @davidbatista1183 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never heard of 😉

  • @creato938
    @creato938 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +723

    Honestly AI is the biggest "Fake until you make it" i've seen in a good while, it's sad but it's the current gold rush.

    • @coreym162
      @coreym162 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      No! It depends on the industry and use case. Sadly, there aren't very many practical A.I use cases. It's mostly akin to a very sophisticated toy. However, a toy that can be very lucrative with integrity, sustainability and judgment. It's really mostly lip service with already establish corporations that gives it worth rather than the A.I alone.

    • @burgermind802
      @burgermind802 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @coreym162 'AI AI AI AI AI .... ' : the sound of wall Street

    • @creato938
      @creato938 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      @@burgermind802 After i saw an "AI Rice cooker" i gave up.

    • @john.carlson23
      @john.carlson23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Wow. That was the best and most concise description of this snake oil garbage I have seen.

    • @Landgraf43
      @Landgraf43 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@coreym162 there are actually many good use cases. Summarizing, search, coding, material science, protein folding, developement of medicine and so on.

  • @reagand.hamilton5965
    @reagand.hamilton5965 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Please know how much I appreciate the lack of exaggeration in your thumbnails. It is refreshing and pleasant to be able to click on a content thumbnail without feeling slightly dirty giving a response to the current trend of shocked disembodied faces. Excellent content and tone, again! please continue to spread the word and the very important hope~

  • @norcatch
    @norcatch 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    In the late 19th and early 20th century, there were a lot of products riding the wave of this new fangled electricity thingy.
    My personal favorite is «electric underpants»

    • @eternity8811
      @eternity8811 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I like the autodresser. It leaves me bruised and bloodied but it saves me straining to pull on my own pants 😂

  • @alex90271
    @alex90271 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +674

    Such a great video, AI is such a marketing buzzword these days for anything where the computer seems to "think" for itself

    • @KamilOwnz
      @KamilOwnz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      "AI" is a marketing buzzword indicating that the company is paying to use OpenAI's technology in some capacity.

    • @tsheposeeletso6475
      @tsheposeeletso6475 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I hate it so much

    • @jensenraylight8011
      @jensenraylight8011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think AI will end up the same like Blockchain, Web3, NFT, and all other dead project.
      here the thing, AI is Unpredictable and Uncertain,
      because they often give you a false information, you'll be forced to Triple check each Results.
      it end up becoming way slower than if you just google it yourself.
      things like booking Appointment, buying ticket, and Checking schedule,
      AI often gives you the wrong information.
      also if you generate 10 times, 7 out of 10 they'll give you a different answer,
      and i bet you'll stop trusting AI, and it's only as useful as a Party trick like Siri
      and this will build a sense of Distrust amongst users,
      where instead of taking Risk of being wrong or end up in embarrassing situation,
      they would rather do it themself and not using any AI App.
      like do you feel comfortable to book Hotel, rent a car, or buy a new Iphone using AI alone?
      Then business will also stop using AI before they do a Major mistake, Marketing Blunder, Lawsuit caused by AI.
      even right now, there are already ton of Self driving car accident caused by AI,
      AI is more dangerous than a Traditional programmed Algorithm

    • @jensenraylight8011
      @jensenraylight8011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think AI will end up the same like Blockchain, Web3, NFT, and all other dead project.
      here the thing, AI is Unpredictable and Uncertain,
      because they often give you a false information, you'll be forced to Triple check each Results.
      it end up becoming way slower than if you just google it yourself.
      things like booking Appointment, buying ticket, and Checking schedule,
      AI often gives you the wrong information.
      also if you generate 10 times, 7 out of 10 they'll give you a different answer,
      and i bet you'll stop trusting AI, and it's only as useful as a Party trick like Siri
      and this will build a sense of Distrust amongst users

    • @me0101001000
      @me0101001000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      AI in itself isn't even that big of a deal. It's been around since the 60s. AI is just a slightly fancier linear algebra algorithm, at the end of the day.

  • @SpentAmbitionDrain
    @SpentAmbitionDrain หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This tech reminds me of VR. The promise and utility is definitely there, but VR time and time again failed to deliver. Some minor element is mossing.
    An interesting idea to explore is: what if AI hype dies down and companies find themselves rehiring to get the growth going again. After all, you only get the growth from firing people once, to keep growing you actually have to deliver something. I would not be surprised if 2026 became the turn around year if AI development platos.

    • @JohnnyThund3r
      @JohnnyThund3r 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      AI development is defiantly plateauing, every major training model is showing the same thing. Chat GPD will probably only get ~10% improvement over the next 6 years, and ~6% improvement 10 years after that. A.I. can't think in abstractions like a human can yet, they are a billion years behind us and the amount of training needed to get to AGI is going to be exponentially cost prohibitive if we continue with the current method of training A.I.

    • @dokkaebi757
      @dokkaebi757 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@JohnnyThund3rwe would need a breakthrough in our implementation to get massive % gains again

  • @Argee55732
    @Argee55732 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just came across this. The TH-cam algorithms must be at work. Enjoyed it immensely. Brilliant dialogue, great voice, great insight and all in all very well done. I am a new subscriber all the best and thank you.

  • @Koombs
    @Koombs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +327

    I think it's important the customer service chat bots swear when appropriate.

    • @WeeWeeJumbo
      @WeeWeeJumbo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      i would love it if an AI helper heard my complaint and said ‘godDAMN that’s terrible lol’

    • @w花b
      @w花b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      "Anyway, I'm kinda busy rn so take your complaint somewhere else alright?"​@@WeeWeeJumbo

    • @Makes_me_wonder
      @Makes_me_wonder 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's a joke, right?

  • @BrianMartensOfficial
    @BrianMartensOfficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +257

    I think the largest hurdle for AI is going to be reliability, especially if it is going to be integrated into engineering / healthcare. I don't want to constantly have to baby-sit, fact-check, and correct output from these models. If I'm going to be paying a subscription fee that's more expensive than Netflix/Disney+/etc (for my work, not leisure), then I'm going to want these models to not just write correct and efficient code, but secure code as well. Without more reliability, A.I. will always be a tool for people who don't know what they're doing, which is fine if you're a hobbyist, but not if you're a professional.

    • @TheSeppentoni
      @TheSeppentoni 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      Don't worry. Some overworked folks in a Data Center in Mumbai will review the output beforehand

    • @jean-marcducommun8185
      @jean-marcducommun8185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Exactly the point I'm bringing up as I have the impression that AI is good when it doesn't need to be precise. I tested it with a simple question (how many times further away is the sun compared to the moon from earth) and it came up with the wrong result. But it tends to work when there is some leeway like language, pictures etc. Bottom line: It's painful to trust a system when you know that from time to time is gives erroneous answers.

    • @toututu2993
      @toututu2993 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Well spoken. AI has been praised for 30 plus years now despite it still being bad when industries are trying too hard to make it replace humans in every activities

    • @rmirabelle
      @rmirabelle 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I would argue the opposite point. Due to hallucination, Large Language Models (not all of AI) will continue to require human supervision. But you need experts to discern hallucination, not "people who don't know what they're doing". So for the time being, LLMs are most useful for professionals.

    • @kingofhearts3185
      @kingofhearts3185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The question is if double checking it is faster than doing it yourself. Those are the use cases, few as they are.

  • @realestalex2728
    @realestalex2728 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I remember listening to an earnings call where the CEO proudly stated: "we are now using generative AI to predict inventory levels".
    You are asking a chatbot how many boxes of Kleenex to buy for the quarter, also machine learning has been used for inventory management for a looong time now, nothing wrong with being late but don't try to use it as a marketing gimmick to prompt up your stock price.

  • @WistrelChianti
    @WistrelChianti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    REALLY REALLY Good video! I don't think AI is causing layoffs as yet... at least not in terms of the most recent progress in generative AI over the last 2 years but I think we might be seeing more subtle efficiencies brought about by process/job analysis and software solutions to simply get stuff done better. A classic one (which is actually AI) would be the call center AI's that take your name and account number. Likely these get your details up on the screen of the agent when you speak to them, likely cutting a minute of say an average 8min conversation. This means something like a 13% efficiency in call throughput for agents available, meaning it's possible to cut 13% of staff from that section. This is a fairly extreme example though. I genuinely think most of it will be around simply the adoption of tech for efficiencies rather than AI.

    • @wnose
      @wnose 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      On upwork there has been a falloff of 22% in writing jobs

  • @braineaterzombie3981
    @braineaterzombie3981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Same things. I see many companies labelling something ai when its just some basic python function.

    • @rayecast
      @rayecast 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Lots of them are also just wrappers for chatgpt, which I find hilarious.

    • @JJ-zr6fu
      @JJ-zr6fu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yeah an algorithm that changes from feedback is now AI

    • @markyacoubian1911
      @markyacoubian1911 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That explains all the "object-oriented" tech support. Not FUNCTIONAL.

  • @Amidreamingnow
    @Amidreamingnow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +209

    You forgot to mention what Google did with the Bard Gemini AI chat , people thought that the AI was talking in real time because it sounded so casual and natural , but it was a lie, they manually prompted the responses and added them , their excuse was " We wanted to show how the tech will look like in the futue " 😂😂😂

    • @MrRahulKumarKandula
      @MrRahulKumarKandula 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      WHAT!!!!..Who the hell did i chat all my feelings with.

    • @awwwkwaarder5287
      @awwwkwaarder5287 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrRahulKumarKandula You're chatting with the a.i. It would cost a nonsensical amount of money for people to do it

  • @user-rf4oh6vd9z
    @user-rf4oh6vd9z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

    711 just needs just one Indian to watch you check out...

    • @NavonWallace
      @NavonWallace หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂😂😂

    • @MrFolgers
      @MrFolgers หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol

    • @panathaninf
      @panathaninf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haahhaha

    • @leimaniax
      @leimaniax หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hahaha, Totally underrated comment!!!

  • @remka2000
    @remka2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Funny that Amazon actually DOES (or did?) have a service called Mechanical Turk.
    Which is human powered (and yes, very low paid).
    In a big (like one of the top five biggest) IT company we used to say:
    - "AI" is for the general public
    - "machine learning" is for investors
    - "statistics" is actually to hire people who know how to code it
    (same company ended up firing 10% of its worforce because investors were scared of its potential lateness in "AI"...)
    A big difference with the "first wave" of automation in the 19th century is that this time it WILL affect white collars too : doctors, lawyers, architects etc. Also creative jobs : why AI is not replacing dangerous, uninspiring jobgs but the most creative ones (composer, cg artit etc.) is beyond me.

    • @Tokru86
      @Tokru86 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because the dangerous, uninspiring jobs are also the ones which (most often) require manual labor on location. Something which AI can't and won't do in the foreseeable future as this requires fully functional robots first. It's only logical that simple office jobs that only require a computer will be the first to go. And especially creative jobs because they create something that most often doesn't need to adher to any quality or logical standards, only taste. There is just nothing better suited to be done by an AI that randomly creates text/CGI out of thin air.

  • @RedOak30
    @RedOak30 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    As someone who works customer service for a tech company, I'm planning on going back to school in 2026 to get a new degree. I've already survived one round of layoffs, but I don't anticipate surviving many more. Our leadership has promised profusely that AI won't replace us, but they're already trialing it on some of our tickets. One of my close friends is on the team that's testing it, and he's horrified because he knows he's helping train the machine that will eventually replace him. But that's the project he was handed so he doesn't have a choice.
    All of my siblings are very into tech and the future of tech. They remain purposefully oblivious to why I'm so scared. There's the chance that the bubble pops and it's all hype and dies away. But I doubt it. Companies smell a savings. And they don't really care who or what they destroy in the process.

    • @Iron-Bridge
      @Iron-Bridge 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      True. Corporate leadership only looks out for the balance sheet. Never trust them to look out for your well being. People need to look out for themselves.

    • @randomtinypotatocried
      @randomtinypotatocried 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Iron-BridgeThe shareholders also need to see that growth no matter the cost

    • @A2B_Music
      @A2B_Music 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Smart to anticipate. Jobs being replaced by "machines" isn't new. Not that long ago a farm had tens or hundreds of employees. Now they can run them alone or just a few people.

    • @bedazzledmisery6969
      @bedazzledmisery6969 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Go get a degree in managing AI dude. :) boom. Always gonna be needed. 😊

    • @mafiousbj
      @mafiousbj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That's why the handyman coming to repair a leak makes as much as a software engineer lately 😂

  • @Raptor50aus
    @Raptor50aus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +136

    AI is like 30 years ago when Intel used the term "MIPS" to promote CPU performance. MIPS stood for "Meaningless information to promote sales"

    • @Marrow9000
      @Marrow9000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I programmed in MIPS in one of my electrical engineering classes for microprocessors a long time ago. It was hard and tedious.

    • @worskaas
      @worskaas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Marrow9000I suppose that is why x86 codebase for Windows was the only one that was stable even though Windows was originally intended for MIPS because they thought it would be the future

    • @morpheas768
      @morpheas768 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh come on.

  • @hersh476
    @hersh476 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    remember 10 years ago everyone was saying machine learning and Data Science was the go-to hot career path for aspiring software engineers? Now ML is ready for next big step forward which is AI. At the heart of it will always be a model or group of models that have been trained on data that may have been acquired questionably.

  • @cootified
    @cootified 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well done mate! Brilliant! You have a kanck of forming a view that is quintessentially Aussie. Love ya work, keep it up.

  • @phasm42
    @phasm42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +500

    I would go further: we don't actually have AI. We have machine learning, which has shown itself quite good at faking intelligence, but not actually intellifent. ChatGPT, under the hood, is an overpowered autopredict.

    • @jonathan0berg
      @jonathan0berg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      Overpowered autocorrect is still pretty nifty, but it falls way short of what all the hype would have people believe.

    • @oompalumpus699
      @oompalumpus699 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      This! It's a mix and match data sorting machine on steroids.
      But it's not sentient or sapient.
      I'm scared of fungus computers though.
      Those might become self-aware.

    • @Jonas-Seiler
      @Jonas-Seiler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@oompalumpus699 probably not

    • @Jordan-Ramses
      @Jordan-Ramses 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      We don't have human intelligence yet.

    • @mechanicalmonk2020
      @mechanicalmonk2020 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The typo and nonsensical word "autopredict" in this comment is just so deliciously ironic.
      Bro even edited it.

  • @TheMe9595
    @TheMe9595 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    It’s almost like how 4-5 years ago every single company was investigating how to use blockchain. It’s just the latest buzzword that everyone wants to be a part of even if they don’t really have a way of actually using it.

    • @ExplosiveBalls-cv8hg
      @ExplosiveBalls-cv8hg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      omg yes I remember a clip from some reality TV show where they follow some rich young socialites and they were talking about setting up blockchain for their businesses over dinner and look where we are now...

    • @ziggs123
      @ziggs123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Block chain didn't cut 30% of tech jobs did it?

    • @PXAbstraction
      @PXAbstraction 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      ​@@ziggs123Neither has AI yet. That's just the excuse large companies are using to justify layoffs they're really making because of high interest rates and a coming recession showing how most of them don't have viable business models.

    • @whatisrokosbasilisk80
      @whatisrokosbasilisk80 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PXAbstraction I mean, they aren't, they're just saying its a shit market to retain excess talent and we need a cull in the ranks.

    • @whatisrokosbasilisk80
      @whatisrokosbasilisk80 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      A blockchain is a highly specific tool that resolves a very particular problem. AI systems will become better and better simulants of human cognition eventually supplanting the need for them - that day isn't today nor even years from now, but it is coming in the next 30 years and the fact that it will happen in our lifetime should tell you how you should position yourself.

  • @theMosen
    @theMosen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video! Nice to see a channel as large as this one talk turkey

  • @millax-ev6yz
    @millax-ev6yz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yus! Awesome video! I always look forward to your stuff! How do you make such informative and graphically rich videos? I'd ask AI....but...

  • @sapphiron21
    @sapphiron21 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    I still remember just a few years back when everybody was all crazy about "cloud computing"

    • @oompalumpus699
      @oompalumpus699 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just watched a documentary here on YT about clockwork automata.
      Even back then, the inventors claimed their machines could think like a human.
      For example, a clockwork chess player automata.
      Turns out, there was a guy under the table operating it.
      Also, people back then called each other NPCs.
      That is, an insult for a person who is more machine instead of human.

    • @k.h.6991
      @k.h.6991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Cloud computing is real. But it is not much more than moving code onto managed servers.

    • @dtsh4451
      @dtsh4451 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Do you know how many moving their applications back to premises these days😂?

    • @MiguelSandoval-md8qh
      @MiguelSandoval-md8qh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How many ??? ​@@dtsh4451

    • @robrider838
      @robrider838 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@k.h.6991 never used paas then?

  • @tonywilson4713
    @tonywilson4713 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +199

    *FANTASTIC TO FINALLY SEE PEOPLE CALLING THIS HYPE OUT.*
    I'm an aerospace engineer (by degree) who works in industrial control systems and the staggering amount of nonsense I hear on AI is ridiculous. In the early 1990s I had neural nets and how they actually functioned explained by an electrical engineer who'd worked on them while at University. The origins of neural nets goes back to the 1950s BEFORE the emergence of digital computers.
    The first generation neural nets were fundamentally analog computing devices set up for complex calculations. The YT channel Veratasium did a good video on what analog computers are, why they were used in the past and why they have potential applications again today. AI (as we know it) is basically digital versions of analog computers and being digital they can be scaled up to immense complexity in a reliable and repeatable way.
    The most important thing that I see people misunderstanding is that these AI systems DO NOT THINK, but instead they CALCULATE ANSWERS to very complex statistical math. We see this most often when the search box on YT or Google starts giving possible questions as we start typing. Its *CALCULATING* the most likely search to what you are typing.
    I BLAME the promoters and media pundits for this misconception.

    • @qazmko22
      @qazmko22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Agreed... but firing all these people probably has even less to do with AI... I'm no economist but all these companies sales and revenues have slowed. THAT is the likely culprit, these massive companies are thinking scale and employee pay is a large cost for running a business.
      As for AI, I don't think it will replace any jobs (even programing jobs), these jobs will always be TOO specific for them to be replaced by a computer.

    • @spark5558
      @spark5558 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@qazmko22Also what the real economy is doing and what the bs money print part os doing are 2 different things

    • @thomasschlitzer7541
      @thomasschlitzer7541 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@qazmko22proof your claim. All quarterly reports state otherwise. Shrinking sales and revenues? Where? Maybe at your grocery store but for sure not on the stock market (Q4/23 and Q1/24). That’s just a false claim.

    • @jimipet
      @jimipet 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      They do think. Unless you are in the philosophy school of dualism, then the human thinking is nothing more than calculating asnwers to very complex statistical math as defined by the complex structure of our brain. There is a reason they are called "Neural" networks.

    • @zaidlacksalastname4905
      @zaidlacksalastname4905 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You really like CAPS LOCK

  • @jacobnoble8778
    @jacobnoble8778 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for this! I have been watching Coldfusion TV for a while now. The amount of research you put into your pieces is really astounding. Obviously the mechanical Turk was an embarrassment to some really powerful people, yet there you go showing picture after picture of it be used against them! Also loved how well you explained the term “AI washing”. Great job.

  • @skyscraper5910
    @skyscraper5910 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s also a casualty of AI actually meaning any algorithm. A simple, step by step, procedure for choosing or predicting something is AI, deep learning, LLMs, neural networks, robotics are all a specific kind of AI.

  • @Mr.Rogers91
    @Mr.Rogers91 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +168

    I worked for a company that claimed they leveraged AI powered system. It was just a room of people there was legit no AI. I went on to work for the same guys at a new tech company and they were doing the same thing except this time they laid off my dept and claimed the AI was doing it now lol

    • @timcasady4750
      @timcasady4750 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Your job was offshored to India, Philippines or some other region where labor and benefits are much lower

    • @Mr.Rogers91
      @Mr.Rogers91 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @timcasady4750 unfortunately I know. It was Phillipines they started working before we were laid off. It was a crappy situation and I saw it coming but rode it out.

    • @iscifion7122
      @iscifion7122 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Profit speaks.

    • @TheGamehorn
      @TheGamehorn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      My favorite is when the marketing people get involved and decide that anything that has been programmed or run by an algorithm is now AI since it follows computer logic, which is somehow more real than outsourcing to a hidden group from a 3rd world country

    • @StallionStudios1234
      @StallionStudios1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I wonder if they can use it for processing Guar Gum. That is used in a lot of foods as a thickening agent. It is used in ice cream and other foods that you consume. It is also used in fracking to get the sand and other proppants down the well bore into where it needs to be. Interesting stuff!

  • @wwjjss33
    @wwjjss33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +372

    I think the real takeaway is how awesome & productive 1,000 Indians can be!
    In all fairness, Amazon should argue that “AI” actual stood for “All Indians” 😂

    • @buckbreaker5185
      @buckbreaker5185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Kek

    • @SteveNaranjo
      @SteveNaranjo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂😂

    • @A1stardan
      @A1stardan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That's what they'll say if taken to court😂

    • @cristibaluta
      @cristibaluta 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the 'all indians' where checking that the AI works. It seems to me that one store would have spent less money on few cashiers.

    • @imharshmalik
      @imharshmalik 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      More like Anonymous Indians 😂

  • @ChristopherAbelman
    @ChristopherAbelman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +531

    I read that Nvidia develops tech for crypto mining services/blockchain transactions. Could the current crypto pump be attributed to Nvidia’s great earnings and should I hold some crypto as well, cos tbh I’m having FOMO with the current crypto price at 64k.

    • @HildaBennet
      @HildaBennet 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Microstrategy CEO bought $155million worth of bitcoin, so yes BUY! It’s going to be a crazy year for these sectors, so you should def. invest in crypto. 60% of my portfolio is spread across tech stocks, crypto and Crypto/Gold ETFs.

    • @FinnBraylon
      @FinnBraylon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well the crypto market is expected to perform better than any other equity sectors this 2024 especially with the SEC crypto ETF approval but it’s a volatile market nevertheless and if you’re new to it, it’s best to reach out to an experienced manager for proper strategy.

    • @FinnBraylon
      @FinnBraylon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't be hesitant to contact Sonya Lee Mitchell and follow her directions.

    • @Clawthorne
      @Clawthorne หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      How appropriate that on a video about AI, we have ChatGPT-powered scambots talking to other scambots trying to engage the reader about crypto. Lol.
      I wonder if I mention the magic word I'll have tons of bots trying to convince me into buying monkey jpegs... lets try it: I want to invest in NFTs.

    • @fractale4322
      @fractale4322 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      THIS COMMENT CHAIN IS A SCAM, ALL ARE BOTS

  • @ComboSmooth
    @ComboSmooth หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    my company fired a bunch of HR staff and replaced them with AI lol.

    • @Shellll
      @Shellll หลายเดือนก่อน

      Suddenly I love AI

    • @johnnyfatsacks5209
      @johnnyfatsacks5209 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      A feel-good AI story ❤️

  • @GhostofTradition
    @GhostofTradition 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +213

    Mark Cuban saying we aren't in a bubble is the biggest indicator that we Are in a bubble 😂

    • @kalef1234
      @kalef1234 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yeah lol. There would be AI IPOs left and right if interest rates were low, that's why they aren't. Existing, large companies are definitely hyping it up

    • @Daniel_WR_Hart
      @Daniel_WR_Hart 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So really he could say anything and it would indicate that we're in a bubble?

    • @venkateshtelu7815
      @venkateshtelu7815 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I didn't really get it. What actually happens if this bubble pops? Can someone please explain

    • @Daniel_WR_Hart
      @Daniel_WR_Hart 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@venkateshtelu7815 A bubble is when the value of something is speculated to be much higher than it should be, and this happens because people are valuing a thing for how much more they think other people are willing to pay for it in the future.
      People don't understand that the value of their stocks are not simply StockQuantity X MarketValue, and they don't realize that behind the market price, there are many orders placed for stocks to buy below market value and to sell above market value. People mass selling their shares at the market price causes the highest buy orders to be filled automatically, so when too many shares are traded too quickly, the market price will drop. If it drops too quickly, people will notice and either panic sell or "buy the dip", but if overall sentiment is that they would prefer to get out now to either pay off loans or play it safe, the price plummets and the people that "bought the dip" end up "holding the bag" i.e. they overpaid for something people don't value anymore.
      tl;dr The market price is an equilibrium determined by buyers and sellers, and when too many people speculate on the value to be very high, this inevitably leads to a mass selloff and price drop because you will always have wealthy investors that understand that the bubble can't go on forever, and some big investors took out large loans to invest that they need to pay back.

    • @sirus312
      @sirus312 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol

  • @fishfish8879
    @fishfish8879 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

    “Just because something isn't a lie does not mean that it isn't deceptive. A liar knows that he is a liar, but one who speaks mere portions of truth in order to deceive is a craftsman of destruction.”
    ― Criss Jami

    • @w花b
      @w花b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It's just lies by omission

    • @robolizard222
      @robolizard222 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ⁠@@w花b is right. Sounds like this philosopher has never heard of a “lie of omission” before. There’s lying through commission, which is the typical lie (committing an untruth) and then lying through omission which obviously is disregarding details to sell a narrative.

    • @ILikeADoDaChaCha7
      @ILikeADoDaChaCha7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Aka sales people

  • @mnash3
    @mnash3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool vid...
    Everytime I think I am reasonably competent on a topic, I get quickly reminded that what I think I understand and the reality of a topic could be extremely different.
    You may already have this video, but if u have time, please do a video simply called....What is AI?
    In the video, please cover how artificial intelligence differs from automating a business process and differs from replacing a human with robots whether in a warehouse replacing forklift drivers or simply a chatbox with automated responses based on the most asked questions and differs from instructing an online tool to create a report, website, or business contract.
    I can go on with rambling with what I thought AI was, but as I am typing this and thinking about the topic, I am that much more confused on the topic.
    That might be an even better title...
    What is AI and what is AI in 2024?
    Thanks again for sharing your experience, research, and opinion.

  • @AlphasysNl
    @AlphasysNl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Gartner Hype Cycle has a lot in common with the Doenning-Krueger effect. The initial overhype that can't deliver, is just like the novice that thinks they know everything, when they have zero experience yet. It's a hubris trap, promising the world, but unable to deliver when asked.

  • @j.j.9511
    @j.j.9511 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +240

    When I found out that Amazon A.I. store was a lie & just 3rd world tech support watching through cameras I was the least shocked person on earth.

    • @artsmith103
      @artsmith103 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Living in a place that would never have one, I thought it was real for a limited market that would never scale much. I like the true version better.

    • @iscifion7122
      @iscifion7122 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      3rd world tech support!?
      More like labelling data for ML.
      They were probably data scientists or engineers.
      Most of LLM still need human intervention for proper learning.
      None of so called AI is completely autonomous, they're made to learn on large amount of data under human supervision and still can make huge amount of mistakes.

    • @TheManinBlack9054
      @TheManinBlack9054 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Humans were used as a back up system, not as a system.

    • @Fezzy976
      @Fezzy976 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@iscifion7122 Damn, someone here with an actual brain. You are spot on!

    • @vandelay_industries
      @vandelay_industries 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@TheManinBlack9054 70% intervention rate my guy. After what, 4-5 years of operation. Only ever in intent were humans not the system.

  • @StatsMass
    @StatsMass 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1000 Indian contractors overseeing the transactions from 62 grocery stored, 12 airports, 2 universities, and multiple stadiums is actually pretty impressive labor savings. I guess the question is how it compares to self-checkout in terms of merchandise loss.
    Combined with the rich customer information you'd get from the systems required to make this work.... Honestly I think it's probably just a little too early is all.

  • @johnc5258
    @johnc5258 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tech companies also over-hired in 2020, so lay-offs were naturally for those who were hired but coded too slowly, less elegantly and with less imagination than those who knew the trade well

  • @Hiroprotagonist253
    @Hiroprotagonist253 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    Anyone involved in integrating this stuff within a business realises how few use cases there really are. A lot of the big productivity gains through things like code generation are already realised and from working with that I can tell you competent devs are going to have a lot of work in the future cleaning up the mess this leaves behind.

    • @carlpanzram7081
      @carlpanzram7081 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Its amazing that there are any use cases.
      Any minute of manpower saved is a gigantic accomplishment.
      I feel like people have been wrongfully conditioned to expect insane breakthroughts.
      This technology will improve incrementally, like everything else.
      Its inching up toward human-level ability, and every small progress is a mindboggling miracle.

    • @Hiroprotagonist253
      @Hiroprotagonist253 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@carlpanzram7081 I agree. Its still mind blowing to me to be able to “talk to” a computer using natural language and I wouldnt downplay the technology at all. It is the companies producing the technology that are creating these expectations though.

    • @darkstepik
      @darkstepik 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Hiroprotagonist253 thats just to lure investors and hype the hype

    • @julius43461
      @julius43461 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah I tried hard integrating it but it's rarely helpful. I find it very useful to come up with excel formulas.

    • @w花b
      @w花b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@darkstepikit's gonna crash soon

  • @AvastarBin
    @AvastarBin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

    the layoff come mainly from the very high number of hires in the previous 5 years.
    0% interest rates made it dirt cheap to hire anybody for any R&D project.
    Now that interest rates increased, those companies fired the non-essential workers in 2022 and 2023. And now, they also stopped a few R&D (or moonshot) projects to focus on money making projects resulting in more layoffs.
    AI has nothing to do with that. Even more, those big companies hired a lot of people to work on AI related projects because that could result in so much revenue.
    Also, if you've ever used those AI language models to code or to do anything other than basic stuff, you'll realise that it cannot replace even part of the jobs of evn junior employes

    • @syloui
      @syloui 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't forget the forgivable PPP loans that most companies took out to buttress uncertainty were actually used to over invest on the expectation of further loans, those have likely dried up by now

    • @catserver8577
      @catserver8577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anyone who worked in manufacturing during the "downsizing" years can spot the hole in the plot is actually the tech firms are recording massive profits because they are laying off highly paid human workers en masse. At a time when profits are not presentable to stock holders, this is a typical quick fix to make it look profitable. Hiring back workers for half the salary keeps the ball rolling just fast enough to make it look promising. And of course all profits continue to buoy the CEOs.

    • @jamessullenriot
      @jamessullenriot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I think you are mostly correct, but as far as coding goes, you can replace a small percentage. For example, you would need less junior devs to do the basic tasks. Which is actually a bad thing long term unless AI completely takes over. It's bad because jr devs need to come in and do the trivial tasks to learn.

    • @charvakpatel962
      @charvakpatel962 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed in my company also most layoffs are from divisions that were dreamed up in 2010s and now are not viable enough like AR and Gaming.
      They haven't even done a single layoff in money-making divisions, by little but they are even hiring.

    • @huveja9799
      @huveja9799 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of those big companies are overstaffed with mostly useless people, for an example the case of X ..

  • @reggiebenes2916
    @reggiebenes2916 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    I plan on "Block Chaining" my "A.I." in order to "Disrupt" the industry with "Agile" "Dev Ops". This will create "Synergy" with my "Cloud" services until I can "Pivot" my "Digital Transformation" to an "Internet of Things" model so that I have the "Bandwidth" for the "Bleeding Edge" of "Disruptive Technologies".

    • @rayecast
      @rayecast 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      But can it "bridge" to "smart contracts?"

    • @soundmindbodydivine
      @soundmindbodydivine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Dude you'll be a trillionaire in no time! Can I buy some of your stock?

    • @duancoviero9759
      @duancoviero9759 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Damn bro, you could put that old WeWork CEO out of a job! All you need is a turtleneck and cool hair and you got it 👍🏾

    • @Saliferous
      @Saliferous 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't forget Software as a service.

    • @jul8803
      @jul8803 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Bullshit Bingo Bonanza!

  • @KayVeeSK
    @KayVeeSK หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All we talk about are tech companies having mass layoffs. But how exactly is AI affecting other industries like energy, transportation, food, medicine?

    • @niello5944
      @niello5944 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      AI replacing doctors are the worst long term plan anyone could do. AI can't adapt without new data being fed in. If you replace AI for tasks that doctors should get more experienced in over years of doing the job then what you end up with is new doctors being worse at those jobs and and discoveries and corrections being effectively stopped.
      On the other hand, it's great for navigating through the massive combinations and possibilities of proteins, genes, simulations etc.

    • @KayVeeSK
      @KayVeeSK หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@niello5944 ​I disagree. AI won't replace doctors. Doctors will use AI to enhance improve diagnoses. The invention of the calculator didn't replace mathematicians

  • @gernhartreinholzen3992
    @gernhartreinholzen3992 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    7:13 "Yea it only generates garbage... But faster!"

  • @drmarik06
    @drmarik06 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +387

    It could be more impressive if funeral homes implemented this "just walk out" service!

    • @JakeAdkinsOfficial
      @JakeAdkinsOfficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      It's in Beta. It went through human trials at the tomb of Lazarus. Still waiting for the full release.

    • @Marqan
      @Marqan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Do you want a zombie apocalypse? Because that's how you get a zombie apocalypse!

    • @ylstorage7085
      @ylstorage7085 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Hey, What bout dis
      we implement this "just walk it off" healthcare system.
      Fully Ehh and Aye

    • @blackmcbain3145
      @blackmcbain3145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      "Self -burial" checkout services 😆

    • @paulolaniyi7875
      @paulolaniyi7875 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dark Humor 😂😂😂

  • @4thdealers
    @4thdealers 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    I went to a Google event last week, and Gemini gave this as a response 'Nike is the sponsor of Real Madrid'. There was a spanish guy in the room who almost choked to death laughing.

    • @MarvinPowell1
      @MarvinPowell1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I don't get it...

    • @_KnuXles
      @_KnuXles 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      @@MarvinPowell1 they've worn Adidas since the 90s and as far as I'm aware have never had a kit made by Nike. Their rivals Barcalona have the Nike deal

    • @Kevin-cy2dr
      @Kevin-cy2dr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      ​@@MarvinPowell1Real Madrid is a football team (aka soccer in usa) in the Spanish league,which is sponsored by Adidas not Nike.

    • @TheSeppentoni
      @TheSeppentoni 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      @@MarvinPowell1 The AI mistook Madrid for Barcelona. In Spain, this is heresy of the highest order.

    • @hydoffdhagaweyne1037
      @hydoffdhagaweyne1037 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@MarvinPowell1 wtf dude? you didn't get the joke, must be an American 😂

  • @ra7878
    @ra7878 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! I had a similar suspicion regarding the rational for current tech layoffs…

  • @vickyjean1007
    @vickyjean1007 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Are you concerned about the increase in artificial intelligence?" "No, but i am concerned in the decrease in real intelligence"

  • @dragonfalcon8474
    @dragonfalcon8474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Whatever happened to Google's "Don't be evil" mantra?

    • @UhCold
      @UhCold 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Money

    • @TetrzLesonduclairon-qb7cn
      @TetrzLesonduclairon-qb7cn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      99% of peoples are evil non vegans

    • @MarvinPowell1
      @MarvinPowell1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      They were always evil; they just stopped being in denial.

    • @francis_n
      @francis_n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Or stopped trying to convince us

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That's gone since October 2015

  • @martinhjelmeland4445
    @martinhjelmeland4445 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    Speaking of false advertisement; robot taxi, hyperloop, solar roof tiles, bricks, thermonuclear resistant glass, and so on
    .. It baffles me how some apparently are totally resistant to it...

    • @bentucker2301
      @bentucker2301 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Pizza shops on mars etc

    • @lolatmyage
      @lolatmyage 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      solar roads ...

    • @lury719
      @lury719 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thunderfoot!

    • @tHebUm18
      @tHebUm18 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Bricks!? I'm insulted on behalf of Half as Interesting, the premier brick-related YT channel.

    • @magnateze
      @magnateze 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Got it, bricks don't exist

  • @bigparuppu
    @bigparuppu หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is interesting. I worked in AI-based product (when ai nearly wasn’t ready to be productized) until mid 2020. During my time there were multiple AI companies that got huge valuations in the hype cycle and then collapsed, so I thought of what was happening now as post-crash (most of the businesses I see now are using real AI technologies on the back end of their products).

  • @marcerasmus3745
    @marcerasmus3745 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant Work, balanced outlook...highly recommend keeping track of Cold Fusion.

  • @cbaesemanai
    @cbaesemanai 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +204

    I am a programmer and I have fully embraced using AI technology the moment it was available. Working inside of these tech companies I can comfortably say that AI is not the reason for tech layoffs. In fact the majority of the companies I work for will not even allow the use of it within the company. The bubble may be making companies more comfortable greatly cutting staff in the promise that they don't need those workers but its not reality. Most of it is being driven by market uncertaintay due to insanely high interest rates to curb inflation. Its a sledge hammer that kills the entire tech industry.

    • @Saliferous
      @Saliferous 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      It's also the end of the pandemic, so people aren't spending as much time with tech products while not working. And the VC funding bubble popping due to higher rates.

    • @sirus312
      @sirus312 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Thank you for sharing, I think AI is the scapegoat so no one panics about a slow down coming

    • @far-red
      @far-red 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      for me, i used to work with developers and at times interns, to develop features that company needs, we plan and get dev or intern to develop
      lately, what i need, i need to plan, write a prompt, or multiple prompt, make very minor finetune, and ai (chat gpt 3) does the code.
      its not perfect, hence the multiple prompts, but it gets done fast and with intern, sometimes after 2 week either they cant do it, or its done but not exactly what i want or i just hear technical BS how its not possible..
      it scary, but its the reality

    • @stefanoparlatore7141
      @stefanoparlatore7141 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Interest rates are ok, they were insanely low before.

    • @trichomaxxx
      @trichomaxxx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm also a programmer and that's exactly what I see. I'd also like to add that it doesn't replace a junior dev, I use ChatGPT-4 daily and at most it replaces google search but it's often wrong and I have to resort to google because it makes up bs.

  • @mounirhafsa6193
    @mounirhafsa6193 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Makes you wonder what 'innovation' really means anymore.

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Well, the biggest innovator is actually: the government.
      They fund the research in R&D and the corporations try to do the D part to make it into products.
      While trying to pay as little taxes as possible.

    • @mafiousbj
      @mafiousbj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Elon Musk trying to re-invent the train making it more expensive and complicated (hyper loop) for minimal or no gains at all in speed or service and efficency and just backing it up with tons of hype.
      Basically that's modern innovation by tech bros 😂

    • @corvus8638
      @corvus8638 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It means charging you a monthly subscription for rubbish

    • @ethanquenum4778
      @ethanquenum4778 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mafiousbj Elon Musk in African. Not surprised.

  • @levanaah
    @levanaah 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The chatBOT dissing DPD is actually the first sign of intelligence I ever saw!

  • @seanmcdonald5859
    @seanmcdonald5859 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh no, giant corporations lied to us . . . . . .

  • @TheRelaxingRide
    @TheRelaxingRide 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I'm old enough to remember when Transputers, Robots, and Expert Systems were the tech darlings pre-public-internet.

  • @TheJimmyCartel
    @TheJimmyCartel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    To be fair. That comment from 2021 is completely right. Absolutely none of these AI's "think" or actually try to emulate the human thought.

    • @CK47CD
      @CK47CD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      +1

    • @ethanquenum4778
      @ethanquenum4778 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is a thought ?

  • @matthewvicendese1896
    @matthewvicendese1896 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is why moving towards public ownership of major companies and democratising the processes of those major companies as well as more regular votes for parliaments. This will lead a better distribution of wealth and leisure time.

  • @yzerman123
    @yzerman123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for reminding everyone that AI was NOT created in November 2022 when ChatGPT was released.

  • @tai31415
    @tai31415 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    I feel like a huge part of AI development that is missed in this video is how the models are largely trained on stolen work. I don't mean in the way that workers are paid to do work for companies, I mean usage of copywrited content without the consent of the copywrite holder. You can get chat GPT to spit out lyrics of various songs using key words, and phrases from various websites. The only reason it is viable for these companies is due to all the work of others they are taking, and hoping they can displace them fast enough before regulations and fines catch up to what has happened.
    If they actually paid for the work they are taking, it wouldn't be even remotely profitable to run these systems (not that they currently are profitable in most cases).
    In my mind, that's what makes this a bubble. It isn't just the hype, it is that they are flagrantly breaking existing law to the point that they should be fined into non-existance in most cases.

    • @Noelciaaa
      @Noelciaaa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, precisely this. It's profitable because law tends to lag behind tech. It's plain stealing.

    • @oompalumpus699
      @oompalumpus699 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I lost faith in the AI revolution when the NFT/Crypto bros started moving in.

    • @thomaskahl7670
      @thomaskahl7670 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You went to school? You‘ve learnt from books?

    • @Jonas-Seiler
      @Jonas-Seiler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      well here's to hoping for the nytimes case

    • @Jonas-Seiler
      @Jonas-Seiler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@nono99136 "ai" cannot legally be attributed any personal freedoms. using an algorithm to scrape and repost copyrighted content as is, as part of a collage, or otherwise modified, is already addressed by copyright law. it's an entirely reasonable assumption that judges may deem training statistical models on copyrighted works without express permission and then using them to sell a service as illegal.

  • @user-lh3rx3kh3x
    @user-lh3rx3kh3x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    there was a little tiny slip of the tongue moment in this video and I'm so glad you kept it in the final cut. it's such a comfort to have little human touches like that while listening to discussion about something as cold and emotionally removed as current ai
    thanks for another great video!

    • @swagatpatra2139
      @swagatpatra2139 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What was the slip?

    • @binkwillans5138
      @binkwillans5138 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yes, wonderful slip, the funniest and most thought-provoking slip I've heard in 20 years. Please don't tell anyone what it was, let people discover for themselves (if they can).

    • @HughJass-jv2lt
      @HughJass-jv2lt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂

    • @Sick_Pencil
      @Sick_Pencil 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@binkwillans5138 now I can't sleep at night until I find it

    • @twaylan
      @twaylan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read this at the moment it happened

  • @OutOfTheBoxThinker
    @OutOfTheBoxThinker หลายเดือนก่อน

    We're in a bubble that is very likely to burst soon.
    The tech is often legit, but too many corporations peddling AI simply have no valid business plan.
    And there's too much competition.

  • @tomsanders5584
    @tomsanders5584 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'll believe the AI hype when my local Walmart can give me an accurate count of their inventory online.

  • @4RILDIGITAL
    @4RILDIGITAL 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    Fascinating look at the struggles and deceptive practices around AI implementation. It is disappointing to see how some companies opt for shortcuts and hype to misinform public and investors. We need more transparency and ethical practices in the tech industry.

    • @rajeshranjan3199
      @rajeshranjan3199 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You are an AI.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bruh. Did u use ChatGPT to make this comment?? 😂

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bruh. U used chat gpt to make this comment. 🤣. It’s a nothing burger.

    • @Jonas-Seiler
      @Jonas-Seiler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they must rely on shortcuts because the technology simply can't support their use cases on it's own

  • @willteasel6099
    @willteasel6099 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    I have first hand experience with a company that I was trying to contact a representative as when I called it connected me to their AI representative Emily after repeating my request over and over I waited until a real rep could help me which wasn’t much better at this call was directed to a call center in the Philippines and because the reps English was not good they redirected me to another rep which was in Africa and once again the reps English was poor so this time I stated I would only speck to someone based in the U.S. - The picture if perfectly clear these companies are looking for the lowest cost to handle business and when AI fails they transfer you to countries with lower labor costs so the layoffs are only about profit

    • @TheManinBlack9054
      @TheManinBlack9054 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Well, at least back in the day companies actually cared about the customer experience and their workers and not just profits.

    • @DarkGob
      @DarkGob 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If you're going to criticize a non-native speaker's ability to speak English, you should at least figure out how to use punctuation.

    • @hullstar242
      @hullstar242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TheManinBlack9054when was that? Big Companies have never cared about customer experience unless it affected profits in my nearly 30 years of life.

    • @jeffrey1025
      @jeffrey1025 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@DarkGob He's not criticizing the non natives English speakers ability to speak English. He is criticizing a system that forces him to have to work with non native speakers, who in turn provide a worse service because they are non native.
      If you're going to feel the need to white knight and defend people you don't know, you should at least figure out how to understand the argument at hand.

  • @FutureCommentary1
    @FutureCommentary1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Junior roles where people train are being eliminated. 10 to 15 years from now there'll be a gap in senior positions because the pipeline isn't there anymore.

  • @Tisisrealnow
    @Tisisrealnow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    honestly using 'powered by ai' sounds more like a catch than a benefit. Like i wouldnt trust a random algorithm to do important calculations or anything important, rather than a human team who actually understand and efficiently make what theyre supposed to do

  • @NirvanaFan5000
    @NirvanaFan5000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Thank you! Everyone talks about AI as if it'll replace 100% of every task, while others point out that it can't. But like you said, it doesn't need to do everything, just enough that downsizing is possible. E.g. a team of 3 instead of 10... and of course, AI will continue to work toward 100% of everything, but it doesn't have to get there before it starts causing havoc.

    • @jan.tichavsky
      @jan.tichavsky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The havoc will start when we get cheaply manufactured humanoid robots that can repair and build each other. Before that it will be contained in a virtual world, not interesting for the average person. But it won't stay there long.