I'm sorry bro, but if your PC is running Beam at 10FPS there was no helping you. And he did say that in the begining. Go back to the DirectX10 version of the game. Would be better to get a new PC. But I know how it feels for everyone to say that and you cant. I would reccomend getting an old Lenovo or Dell tower and throwing in a cheap GT1030, works amazingly for me (20-30 FPS at Medium) get one with at least a 4th gen Intel processor (I5-4570 or I5-4590 prefered) and you'll be living the budget dream.
I still averaged at 5 fps after the video anyways, which compelled me to get up, get out, and drive my real car instead. Thank you Mayo, you changed my life. I ran over a family of 4 at 248 kmh
Thank you Muye not only did my fps increase drastically but I also was cured of my cancer, my dog came back to life, I got a new higher paying job, and my wife isn’t leaving me anymore.
@@salimelmouaffaq1351 I see, but 30 fps is where it starts to feel like an actual video and/or game instead of a slideshow. 28 fps feels choppy. 30 to 36 fps makes it smoother.
@@ChocoYT602 Yeah, more fps means my computer’s processor is over-performing. Therefore, I put more cars, the fps drops back to that 71 range, then nothing really changed except now I have more cars.
The specs you showed at 1:44 were exactly the same specs I used to have in my old dell. And I can confirm, it was more than playable than expected, it even ran on max graphics at around 35 fps
@@fuziongt because you're using a laptop, gpu and cpu are naturally limited because of heat 1650 isnt even that good of a card to begin with, but since its a mobile card (laptop gpu) its already gonna be worse than you may see on a desktop gpu and if your laptop isnt running too well and its running too hot, that will limit performance aswell
@@can._.you_dont The problem on your computer is probably the CPU and not the GPU, and there isn't much you can do, there is one option in gameplay menu called, simplified collisions, that might help, and closing everything on background including discord.
I feel you man, I managed to run Beam ng on a dell OptiPlex 3020 (8 gigs ddr3 ram, 5th gen intel i5 (quad core), and integrated graphics (1/2 gig of allotted V ram) for over a year and only recently upgraded to a slightly more respectable rig
I followed the low-end instructions and slightly lowered framerate for much better graphics. Also frame rate is more stable, so worth my time. (Started with default low graphic settings)
its insane how much power you need to run this game i need like a $1000 cpu to get more than 2 fps i swear. my rtx 3060 ti is at 20-30% utilization and my 5th gen ryzen 5 which isnt a bad cpu isnt enough to get more than 30 fps on this game
my computer runs it kinda bad but not bad on like small maps Here's about my pc 1. Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 3250U with Radeon Graphics 2.60 GHz 2. Ram 12.0 GB (9.95 GB usable) 3. SystemType: 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor 4. OS Windows 10 Home Single Language/MaybeWindows11
@@saxreaper Literally any other modern car game, forza horizon 4-5, assetto corsa, and many more of the same kind. BeamNG is hardly above average in terms of graphics.
@@2807ft That's another problem, BeamNG is so damn unoptimized, atleast for 20 and 30 series Nvidia cards. 40 fucking fps when I have 5 cars spawned in Italy despite my ryzen 3600xt is just unacceptable, they should find a method to not render the ENTIRE map at once. (CPU and GPU wise, as in, AI paths and graphics).
Thanks, you literally doubled my FPS at very intense spots from 35 to 70 FPS. And for the less intense scenes I can now easily reach my 144 FPS matching my monitor refresh rate! The update rate 6 -> 3 really worked wonders.
LOWERING YOUR TEXTURE QUALITY WILL NOT BRING PERFORMANCE GAINS. Feel free to run the game with high quality textures if you have 4GB+ of VRAM. It's a free quality boost. Textures only start affecting your FPS if you run out of RAM on your GPU.
It will, because it reduces the rendering strain on the GPU of having to draw high quality textures on everything. Lower texture quality = less pixels and things to draw = more performance.
@@cwhitley.sawlabs sure, if VRAM is low, since that will make the game breathe a little easier. You tend to notice when it runs out of RAM and "garbage collects" getting rid of old stuff. But if it doesn't do that with high texture quality, then differences in performance should be minimal.
If you really think about it beamng looks stellar for the amount of calculations that are ran constantly multiple times a second. It’s impressive that a small team has put this game together the way that they have. I cant wait to see if they add tire wear and realistic flat spots, it’ll be so cool to ruin tires and blow them up.
Though the physics simulation they implemented is amazing, the graphics system seems super unoptimized. I mean it looks great and all, but considering all the bells and whistles it has still it doesn't look any better than, say, 2013 Trackmania series, or Euro Truck Simulator 2, but warms up your system pretty good.
If i give you guys a recommendation for a lower end build. I recommend an 8 core/ 16 thread Quadro k2200 build. Its dirt cheap. And runs games like beamng on low settings at an average of around 60-80fps. I got this build on eBay for around 170 bucks. The pc model was a Thinkstation p500. Works flawlessly. Plays games like gta 5 just as good as a high end console. So yeah, if you are wondering what a good recommendation would be. Id look around for a thinkstation p500 or p510. Both are great options to start a build if you truly wanted =)
1:52 I wonder if increasing the amount of RAM would help with performance. The other day I got seriously close to using up all of the ram in my system (32GB) when recording a scene for my latest video and noticed that the frame rate had dropped under the 60 FPS mark. Although it doesn't help that I have like 50 chrome tabs open at the same time. 😅
@@jakefuckingsucks9647 It kinds of is the norm for me tho.... I'll reduce the number of tabs I have open for all the things I need to do once I stop procrastinating 😅😅
I don't get whats wrong with mods. I definitely need all of my 400+ mods. Doesn't even affect my game that much. It gives me the advantage of doing things for hours and not getting bored.
most of the things worked, but I have integrated graphics, yet my game doesn't look too bad. I just get REALLY bad FPS. (note: on all maps, I get same fps on gridmap AND westcoast, idk why.)
I run BeamNG on a GTX 960m (16gb), and manage to get a stable 40-45 fps on most maps In my case, I turn DOF and textures and lighting to normal; with anti aliasing set to FXAA and dynamic reflections off If you want to get more fidelity out of your system I'd recommend tinkering with the Nvidia game filter (you could replicate effects such as ambient occlusion with it) And though some people may consider reshade as a cardinal sin; it can help you with frame rate in some cases by using external anti aliasing and DOF filters through it. I personally use an HDR filter with tonemapping to make up for the downgrades since it maintains a clean look overall If you want minimal stutter i would highly suggest turning down the texture quality and capping the frame rate since the system could thermal throttle
@@adedhuman9582 yeah, the first part i wouldn't consider a flex too but the end part is kinda too highly detailed like you're trying to show your intellect on computers. Your subscriptions support that claim too
@@rafalsitarlol i couldnt find words that would make me sound less like a nerd; though I could see why you thought of that Again, this is more about the things ive noticed while i tried to run games on integrated graphics back then; it could apply to any game
CPU: Intel Xeon E3 1220 3.1Ghz 4 core RAM: 8GB 1200mhz DDR3 Gpu: AMD Firepro V4900 1GB I raised my potato from 15 FPS to 34 FPS On West Coast USA. Thanks MuYe
Oh my, how the definition of potato changes depending on where you look. My local need for speed most wanted enthusiasts would consider that a high end hacking machine. Jokes aside, pc's have really gone a long way.
R5 3600, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SC, 16 GB ram, went from avg ~ 38.9 to ~ 80.5 on west coast at 1080p, using the mid range settings. I wanted the 5% lows to be around 75Hz, before adding the UI elements, since that's what my monitor does. After adding my choice of UI the avg went to ~ 77.5. Might tinker with it and drop some fps for better visuals if I feel like it. Thanks MuYe. Edit: spelling
Pre video: Avg: 30.8 Min: 21 max 31.7 Maxed out: Avg: 19 Min: 16.7 max: 19.5 Hi end optimisation: Avg: 18 Min: 17 max: 22 Mid optimisations Avg: 23 Min: 21 max:25 Low end optimisation: Avg: 22.7 Min 18.5 max: 25 Post optimisation: Avg: 31 Min: 25 max: 36.7 Nvidia 2080 super max q I9-10980hk 32gb ram Seems like I should be getting more fps
Intro feels like BeamNG was ported to Switch. Recently hacked Switch for more games and have to admit Switch is pretty much has nothing to play, apart from Nintendo games. And I feel like OC Switch can run BeamNG in 60fps 720p
The switch will not handle Bean NG well at all. It is based on the Nvidia Tegra X1+ SoC, which aside from being an ARM based chip, is also terribly slow by modern standards. It's roughly a mid-range phone from 5 years ago in terms of performance. The best chance Beam NG has on an ARM based system is an M1 Mac, and failing that, a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1's GPU is actually up to the task when it's not thermally or voltage limited.
MuYe, I have a laptop Acer Nitro 5 wtih Intel core-i7 and NVIDEA 3050 Ti for laptops. With all ultra settings I have only avg 18 fps, and at minimum graphics + 1600*900 (instead of 1920*1080) resolution I have avg 45 fps, but at other games (like CS:GO) it is avg 220 fps. Even no mods, cash cleaning and clean reinstalling doesn't help... WTF?! What should I do?
Went from 56 to 75 on Jungle Rock Island (without moving of course) Helped a tonne. Thanks so much , used a mix between low end and mid range (1650 Max-Q)
I have an rtx 2060 and a Ryzen 5500 processor. On west coast USA, before optimisation I had an average frame rate of 30 💀 but even after the optimisation it was only 34? Can anybody help
If someone can answer this, Im planning to get beamng drive again, but Im not using the same computer as I was before, I currently have a 1050 ti and Ryzen 5 5600g, could it run Beamng?
I got a Core i7 3770k, 12GB RAM (One 4GB RAM Stick broke) GTX 660 Ti Power Edition and average 30FPS on "Normal" Settings. After this video I get around 50 - 60 FPS on the more low end settings, But I do plan on upgrading my GPU eventually to a GTX 1660 Ti or something like that for better performance without making my wallet scream. EDIT: I did a bottleneck calculation with my PC, And I realized I need a better processor to have full use of the new GPU, I plan on moving to AMD at some point though! Meaning new PC All together, So probably a lot of money :/
I use Beamng Drive for Monster Jam and what I am about to tell you may give you a heart attack *BIG MOD WARNING* I have 123 mods, and probably more to come which isn’t that bad, at least for me, for MuYe he must be dying right now
Hey man! I'm here to help! @Surel With these specs, I would recommend turning these graphics all to low, then turn off all effects without motion blur and bloom, set the lighting quality and shader, post processng, to low and turn all shadows on! I have a GTX 1050 but not a Ti only the 2GB model, I hope this helped, wishing luck!
Specs: Win10 Intel Xeon equivalent to a i5 but with 8 cores and no integrated graphics 16gb ram Nvidia gtx750 ti 4gb Specs are between low and potato Before: 22fps on wc usa After: 30fps Important notes: I kept the dynamic reflection on. Everything are on low, texture, shader and post process are lowest, shadows are partial and anistrophic are 4x, no AA, bloom, ssao, rays or dof, tires on 2000, vegetation on .60 Cpu 33% Ram 62% Gpu 100% (lol)
Low end settings: 80 fps max, 45 avg, 28 min High end settings(almost max textures(dyn ref. Low)): 65 max 38 avg, 28 min. Specs: Gtx 1660 super 6gb +125mhz core, +500mhz mem, -150mv power core. I5-6600 performace mode 3.61 ghz 1 ram module 16 gb cl17 2133mhz Hdd wd 7.2k rpm sata 3 Windows 10 on ssd sata III 600mb/s Ask questions if you need.
I can't tell if this is a serious video or not, but those "intensive maps" are very dependant on where your bottleneck is more likely to be, and do you have AMD or NVIDIA. For example, on my CPU bottlenecked system with AMD graphics, West Coast USA and Italy are actually perfectly playable, meanwhile in Hirochi Raceway I get under 30 FPS often, no matter what graphical settings I use. Also, DO NOT disable G-Sync or FreeSync, especially if you get lower than your monitor's hz. Those technologies adjust the monitor refresh rate so the game will feel smoother and there won't be any tearing.
I don't know why, but with a RTX 3060 6GB, 16 GB of RAM, and an external HDD, i get (with Mid range settings) choppy fps that goes from 80 to 13 in a nanosecond, and always slows down. same thing for low end settings, but i get choppy fps that go from 107 to 15. Anybody know what the problem is? Do i have to reinstall the game on my internal SSD instead? Edit: I tested this on the West Coast USA map. Also, with a different car the game ran smoother??
My PC has Intel 7 -7700 ram ddr4 - 48gb m2. ssd samsung 960 pro GeForce 1080 Frankly I had issue with Ram when I had 16gb and I added 32gb and no issue at all. I am updating to laptop MD Ryzen 9 5980HX, 64GB RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD Radeon RX 6800M 12GB but I will try your advices thanks!
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
Does this actually work, or did your computer spontaneously combust into flames?
It combusted into monke
it burns 😭😭😭😭😭😭
@@olliemr.salmon4116 that's an upgrade
Why my computer plays rick rolls everytime I click ? Bruh
Specs:I5 10400f gtx 1650
Increased my avg fps on West Coast by 10-20 ty muye
For low end bois, if you want to increase flame rate, turn everything up to max.
When your stove comes with an integrated computer
I tried and now people blame me that I am the cause of the 90% of polar bear deaths.
199+ FPS
Flames Per Second
If you have Intel's shid integrated graphics :/ then that could actually help
Genuinely*
yea my PC is lit now
literally
Starting FPS: 10
Ending FPS: 10.6
Great tutorial.
Get a older versión of beamng
I'm sorry bro, but if your PC is running Beam at 10FPS there was no helping you. And he did say that in the begining. Go back to the DirectX10 version of the game. Would be better to get a new PC. But I know how it feels for everyone to say that and you cant. I would reccomend getting an old Lenovo or Dell tower and throwing in a cheap GT1030, works amazingly for me (20-30 FPS at Medium) get one with at least a 4th gen Intel processor (I5-4570 or I5-4590 prefered) and you'll be living the budget dream.
@@SkyPassYT i got an i5 4590 and a gtx 1050 LP 2gb and it runs 40 50 fps high in 720p
@@ChocoXD. I’m running a Core I5-4570 and GT1030, I get 25-30 FPS at 720P
@@SkyPassYT wait are yall specs weak or am i just trippin cuz i get like 75 fps max (bcuz i have vsync on) and i have a 4350g and an rx 580 2048sp
I still averaged at 5 fps after the video anyways, which compelled me to get up, get out, and drive my real car instead.
Thank you Mayo, you changed my life.
I ran over a family of 4 at 248 kmh
Inspiring, gonna try it out!
@@niknovsak3288 dont forget to cover your license plate
did they dent the front? if they didnt what car do you have?
@@niknovsak3288 same it sounds fun
Cool, I ran over a family of 5. You will now live in despair knowing that I have ran over a larger amount of people in a family, simultaneously.
Thank you Muye not only did my fps increase drastically but I also was cured of my cancer, my dog came back to life, I got a new higher paying job, and my wife isn’t leaving me anymore.
dam
Cap
thats actualy wild
bro look at his prf pic🤣🤣🤣😂
From averaging 28 fps to 36 fps average it really made a huge difference, thanks a lot.
What r ur specs?
Can't tell if your being sarcastic or not
@@ceemeck 28 to 36 is pretty big, it's the difference between unplayable and playable
@smoothkebab 28 is still very playable, though. I think I usually get around 23, and it's fine. But yeah, 28 to 36 is still a huge bonus
@@salimelmouaffaq1351 I see, but 30 fps is where it starts to feel like an actual video and/or game instead of a slideshow. 28 fps feels choppy. 30 to 36 fps makes it smoother.
This is actually well put together, informative, and serious.
Who are you and what have you done with Muye?!?
Monke
Gone back to the earlier Muye lmao
@@leon_247 yes we want monke back
Sped
Even has the propper TH-cam tutorial music
Starting FPS: 71
Ending FPS: 86.5
Genuine thanks to you MuYe.
Why do you need more than 71 fps ;-;
@@ChocoYT602 multiple cars
@@teddyimbert1762 very reasonable thx
@@ChocoYT602 because it looks better
@@ChocoYT602 Yeah, more fps means my computer’s processor is over-performing. Therefore, I put more cars, the fps drops back to that 71 range, then nothing really changed except now I have more cars.
People who play with 200 mods, like myself, and complain about long loading times and laggy vehicle selection menu are next level.
Same lol
Considering my computer crawls at the menu screen, I need this video.
The ui runs at 12 fps
The specs you showed at 1:44 were exactly the same specs I used to have in my old dell. And I can confirm, it was more than playable than expected, it even ran on max graphics at around 35 fps
im sure that could've been 40-50 with 16gb of faster memory too
how i have a GTX 1650 i7-11800H with 16GB RAM and i run like 30 fps on max
@@fuziongt because you're using a laptop, gpu and cpu are naturally limited because of heat
1650 isnt even that good of a card to begin with, but since its a mobile card (laptop gpu) its already gonna be worse than you may see on a desktop gpu
and if your laptop isnt running too well and its running too hot, that will limit performance aswell
@@isatntt i gotta know how you even knew i was on a laptop
@@fuziongt because you said you had an i7-11800h, the h stands for mobile cpu
This is perfect timing as I just got beamng yesterday!
Edit: I’ve gone from 20-17 fps to 50-60 fps on west coast!
Damg that’s insane!
Zamn
congrats
I went from 27 to 28 :( lol did I do something wrong
@@can._.you_dont The problem on your computer is probably the CPU and not the GPU, and there isn't much you can do, there is one option in gameplay menu called, simplified collisions, that might help, and closing everything on background including discord.
This helps a lot. I'm currently running beam on a glorified potato
I feel you man, I managed to run Beam ng on a dell OptiPlex 3020 (8 gigs ddr3 ram, 5th gen intel i5 (quad core), and integrated graphics (1/2 gig of allotted V ram) for over a year and only recently upgraded to a slightly more respectable rig
you mean a potato cooker? (PC)
@@gigachad6230 Nah its not just any potato, its a Le Bonnotte potato
I got an ad for that one 'Capitalist potato farming game' right before this video...
*Coincidence? I THINK NOT*
im on the integrated ''graphics'' of an intel pentium silver and i can almost get 10 fps with this
Thank you i went from 11-13 fps to around 30 🙏
I followed the low-end instructions and slightly lowered framerate for much better graphics. Also frame rate is more stable, so worth my time. (Started with default low graphic settings)
Went from 1 to 1.000005fps, thanks!
🤣🤣😂😂
I get 10 on gridmap v2
@@Cengizomerca amature i get 12.6 fps with my Ali express microwave
You see muye, beam NG will run on 15 fps whatever tf i do on a UHD 360 igpu
Much thanks and love
I'm sure he's giving it it's all
@@MuYe Yes indeed, my poor igpu is giving all he has, but the thing being
He has literally nothing to give..
Mine goes to 15 on a really good day
I got 10
I have 25 fps on intel uhd g1
BeamNG is an incredible game. I tried running it on my G15 (3070, ryzen 9 5900hs) and created the worlds first sustained fusion reaction.
What job you do
so it was u with the fusion reator breakthrough
its insane how much power you need to run this game i need like a $1000 cpu to get more than 2 fps i swear. my rtx 3060 ti is at 20-30% utilization and my 5th gen ryzen 5 which isnt a bad cpu isnt enough to get more than 30 fps on this game
@@proximitea me on a 300$ laptop: 30 fps
Very Relatable because I have a G7 and also reached fusion reaction
my computer runs it kinda bad but not bad on like small maps
Here's about my pc 1. Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 3250U with Radeon Graphics 2.60 GHz 2. Ram 12.0 GB (9.95 GB usable) 3. SystemType: 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor 4. OS Windows 10 Home Single Language/MaybeWindows11
Its a ASUS Laptop
Wierd question. But what is the song at 0:10 ?
Trance - 009 sound system dreamscape
Giga Chad song
Can you feel my heart by bring me the horizon
Man, this guide is awesome, it doubled my fps, and now I have a total of 2 fps to work with. You are a star.
How to increase framerates in beamng. Turn off realtime reflections. That's it. That's all you need to know. Thank me later
Then the game becomes a 2004 low quality graphics crash simulator
BeamNG already suffers from being behind in graphics.
@@igameidoresearchtoo6511 what the hell you lookin at if BeamNG is behind?
@@saxreaper Literally any other modern car game, forza horizon 4-5, assetto corsa, and many more of the same kind.
BeamNG is hardly above average in terms of graphics.
@@igameidoresearchtoo6511 No hardware could run beamng with forza like graphics
@@2807ft That's another problem, BeamNG is so damn unoptimized, atleast for 20 and 30 series Nvidia cards.
40 fucking fps when I have 5 cars spawned in Italy despite my ryzen 3600xt is just unacceptable, they should find a method to not render the ENTIRE map at once. (CPU and GPU wise, as in, AI paths and graphics).
Thanks, you literally doubled my FPS at very intense spots from 35 to 70 FPS. And for the less intense scenes I can now easily reach my 144 FPS matching my monitor refresh rate!
The update rate 6 -> 3 really worked wonders.
Was update rate the most consequential change? I'm gonna do that now. I think 60fps is minimum for this game.
I literally had West Coast USA open as you said it was the most intense map, it’s my favorite and my pc hates it
I have a friend with integrated graphics and he's got like 159 mods installed. Yes.
I have integrated graphics and have 105 mods installed
Pathetic, I've got over 600 mods
same
i also have integrated graphic and over 200 mods installed but they didn't seem to affect performance that much , just loading times
He's probably got a Ryzen APU, as a 5600G owner myself, i gotta say those little beasts are powerful for integrated graphics
LOWERING YOUR TEXTURE QUALITY WILL NOT BRING PERFORMANCE GAINS.
Feel free to run the game with high quality textures if you have 4GB+ of VRAM. It's a free quality boost. Textures only start affecting your FPS if you run out of RAM on your GPU.
It will, because it reduces the rendering strain on the GPU of having to draw high quality textures on everything. Lower texture quality = less pixels and things to draw = more performance.
@@cwhitley.sawlabs no, uses the same math to map the texture, just take more ram to load it.
@@Wheagg Oh, huh, that makes a bit more sense. Still worth dropping it since there's less VRAM consumption, you know?
@@cwhitley.sawlabs sure, if VRAM is low, since that will make the game breathe a little easier. You tend to notice when it runs out of RAM and "garbage collects" getting rid of old stuff. But if it doesn't do that with high texture quality, then differences in performance should be minimal.
can i run on high settings with a gtx 560? 1gb vram :(
If you really think about it beamng looks stellar for the amount of calculations that are ran constantly multiple times a second. It’s impressive that a small team has put this game together the way that they have. I cant wait to see if they add tire wear and realistic flat spots, it’ll be so cool to ruin tires and blow them up.
Though the physics simulation they implemented is amazing, the graphics system seems super unoptimized. I mean it looks great and all, but considering all the bells and whistles it has still it doesn't look any better than, say, 2013 Trackmania series, or Euro Truck Simulator 2, but warms up your system pretty good.
If i give you guys a recommendation for a lower end build. I recommend an 8 core/ 16 thread Quadro k2200 build. Its dirt cheap. And runs games like beamng on low settings at an average of around 60-80fps. I got this build on eBay for around 170 bucks. The pc model was a Thinkstation p500. Works flawlessly. Plays games like gta 5 just as good as a high end console. So yeah, if you are wondering what a good recommendation would be. Id look around for a thinkstation p500 or p510. Both are great options to start a build if you truly wanted =)
top tip: turn of shadows in the debug menu for extra performance
1:52 I wonder if increasing the amount of RAM would help with performance. The other day I got seriously close to using up all of the ram in my system (32GB) when recording a scene for my latest video and noticed that the frame rate had dropped under the 60 FPS mark. Although it doesn't help that I have like 50 chrome tabs open at the same time. 😅
uhhh yeah chrome tabs are very ram hungry 🤣🤣 it would def help with performance if keeping that many tabs open is the norm for you tho
@@jakefuckingsucks9647 It kinds of is the norm for me tho.... I'll reduce the number of tabs I have open for all the things I need to do once I stop procrastinating 😅😅
When you plays BeamNG 0.14 on lessons in primary school in 20 fps and friends behind you hypes you to beat Chase in Small Island scenario on keyboard
ojj tak byczku
I don't get whats wrong with mods. I definitely need all of my 400+ mods. Doesn't even affect my game that much. It gives me the advantage of doing things for hours and not getting bored.
People with 8 GB ram says this is a bs, *including me* ☝️😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
@@Cr3reeper I have 32 gb of ram
@@ensoelmeri3288 💀
Ok when do you use 400 mods
@@vanillevaschnille9336 All the time man. Like I said it's impossible to get bored when you have so many things to do
most of the things worked, but I have integrated graphics, yet my game doesn't look too bad. I just get REALLY bad FPS. (note: on all maps, I get same fps on gridmap AND westcoast, idk why.)
4:36 I thought the game was more CPU dependent than GPU
You: Helping and talking.
Pigeon in the background: Can I reach light speed?
I run BeamNG on a GTX 960m (16gb), and manage to get a stable 40-45 fps on most maps
In my case, I turn DOF and textures and lighting to normal; with anti aliasing set to FXAA and dynamic reflections off
If you want to get more fidelity out of your system I'd recommend tinkering with the Nvidia game filter (you could replicate effects such as ambient occlusion with it)
And though some people may consider reshade as a cardinal sin; it can help you with frame rate in some cases by using external anti aliasing and DOF filters through it. I personally use an HDR filter with tonemapping to make up for the downgrades since it maintains a clean look overall
If you want minimal stutter i would highly suggest turning down the texture quality and capping the frame rate since the system could thermal throttle
Weird flex but ok
I wouldn't consider as a flex since that gpu (and the laptop) is more than 7 years old now
@@adedhuman9582 yeah, the first part i wouldn't consider a flex too but the end part is kinda too highly detailed like you're trying to show your intellect on computers. Your subscriptions support that claim too
Wait what GTX 960m 16 gb vram??
@@rafalsitarlol i couldnt find words that would make me sound less like a nerd; though
I could see why you thought of that
Again, this is more about the things ive noticed while i tried to run games on integrated graphics back then; it could apply to any game
CPU: Intel Xeon E3 1220 3.1Ghz 4 core
RAM: 8GB 1200mhz DDR3
Gpu: AMD Firepro V4900 1GB
I raised my potato from 15 FPS to 34 FPS On West Coast USA.
Thanks MuYe
It's a miracle the game even boots...I'm legit surprised
Oh my, how the definition of potato changes depending on where you look. My local need for speed most wanted enthusiasts would consider that a high end hacking machine. Jokes aside, pc's have really gone a long way.
@@igameidoresearchtoo6511Ngl I was too when I first installed it.
"Do i really need more than 20 mods?"
*Me with 164 mods, 158 of which are just cars.*
33.3GB is a fair trade.
My first graphic card can't even run beamng drive lol
Tip best cheap graphic card is RX 570 or RX 5700 XT
8:30 That *EXTRA* *CRISPYNESS* with the zoom-in killed me 💀 lmao
9:32 me watching this with like 150gb of mods: 😬
me too xd
R5 3600, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SC, 16 GB ram, went from avg ~ 38.9 to ~ 80.5 on west coast at 1080p, using the mid range settings. I wanted the 5% lows to be around 75Hz, before adding the UI elements, since that's what my monitor does. After adding my choice of UI the avg went to ~ 77.5. Might tinker with it and drop some fps for better visuals if I feel like it. Thanks MuYe.
Edit: spelling
from ~60 to ~115 with high end specs, I was running my dynamic reflections too high but these settings are great!
Pre video:
Avg: 30.8
Min: 21 max 31.7
Maxed out:
Avg: 19
Min: 16.7 max: 19.5
Hi end optimisation:
Avg: 18
Min: 17 max: 22
Mid optimisations
Avg: 23
Min: 21 max:25
Low end optimisation:
Avg: 22.7
Min 18.5 max: 25
Post optimisation:
Avg: 31
Min: 25 max: 36.7
Nvidia 2080 super max q
I9-10980hk
32gb ram
Seems like I should be getting more fps
Intro feels like BeamNG was ported to Switch. Recently hacked Switch for more games and have to admit Switch is pretty much has nothing to play, apart from Nintendo games. And I feel like OC Switch can run BeamNG in 60fps 720p
The switch will not handle Bean NG well at all. It is based on the Nvidia Tegra X1+ SoC, which aside from being an ARM based chip, is also terribly slow by modern standards. It's roughly a mid-range phone from 5 years ago in terms of performance.
The best chance Beam NG has on an ARM based system is an M1 Mac, and failing that, a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1's GPU is actually up to the task when it's not thermally or voltage limited.
Small tip over it
Close background apps. This helps, and a lot
On my RTX 2060 6GB card, following the mid-range optimisation I got
Before: 70fps average
After: 110fps average
MuYe, I have a laptop Acer Nitro 5 wtih Intel core-i7 and NVIDEA 3050 Ti for laptops. With all ultra settings I have only avg 18 fps, and at minimum graphics + 1600*900 (instead of 1920*1080) resolution I have avg 45 fps, but at other games (like CS:GO) it is avg 220 fps. Even no mods, cash cleaning and clean reinstalling doesn't help... WTF?! What should I do?
My frames went from 2 to 4! Thanks! And the cpu temp is now 109 degrees!
Went from 56 to 75 on Jungle Rock Island (without moving of course) Helped a tonne. Thanks so much , used a mix between low end and mid range (1650 Max-Q)
My fps on Utah:
25-30 with lowest settings
13 fps on normal settings
7-9fps on ultra settings
So the awnser is to play it on ultra, as it got a really good fps raid 😜
First! Pin me!
No! I will not pin you!
@@MuYe WHy no listen him he good boy 11!!1!!11
me who is on a laptop scared to download this shit cause its probably gonna crash this shit:
I have an rtx 2060 and a Ryzen 5500 processor. On west coast USA, before optimisation I had an average frame rate of 30 💀 but even after the optimisation it was only 34? Can anybody help
02:55 Thanks to MuYe, it took me over a year to realise I have'nt plugged in my graphicscard wondering about the small amount of my power my pc have.
that must be the greatest feeling ever
@@CrafterOscar Yes, it was.
Thats pure stupidity but at least you found out lol
Are you joking?
@@regera6019 I wish I would
Damn this helped a lot I was at like 17 fps or lower now im at like 50 and 30's.
I found your channel on the beamng steam page which was about FPS increase, glad you made another one.
potato optimasation dind't even help a lil bit thx if you reading.! thx MuYe
1:30 what is that song I remember that just forgot the name
went from 17 to 24 fps
2:42 i have not Nvidia i have Intel :(
I have NVIDIA on my PC
I don’t think you understand stand you got an arc card?
0 fps before and 0 fps after... really helped thanks!
If someone can answer this, Im planning to get beamng drive again, but Im not using the same computer as I was before, I currently have a 1050 ti and Ryzen 5 5600g, could it run Beamng?
It should be fine, just use the lower-end settings
framerate before: 50-70 (gridmap v2)
framerate after: 50-90 (west coast usa)
specs:
intel core i5 7400
sapphire nitro+ rx580
8gb ddr4 ram
Pro tip set it to windowed and make it smaller
It looks better than lowering the resolution
Straight from a patato
(graphics card less) idiot
Who made a PC with no graphics card 😢
thanks after i did this my wife and my kids left me
4:06 I had to rewatch it so many times because it was so frking GREAT
FPS on lowest settings: 20
FPS after turning Texture and Lightning to Normal: Not Responding
Before: 13 - 14 FPS
After - 27 - 28 (Only if you look up), 13.7 - 14.4 - .3 if you look f/b.
Thanks! its a big improvement!
After following potato + random changing, i got an increase 10fps ! Now if have 35fps !
Thank you Moyo, my frameraterinos went from 1.5 to 6 FPS and it really makes a difference.
Wall poster to flick book. I like it 😆
@@EatingMachine23 honestly
damn 4x difference
💀
He has the dad of the school PC itself 💀
Before watching: 31 fps
After watching: 31 fps
i already optimized it lol
I kinda feel like the game should run at double the framerate in general.
goofy ahh ancient DX11 game
I get 40 fps with 4gb of ram. My trick is to play the oldest version you can get.
West Coast:
Before: average 42 fps
After: average 61 fps
Other maps:
Before: average 72 fps
After: average 86 fps
IT WORKS
UPDATE: I upgraded my pc from RTX 3050 INTEL I5 to RTX 4070 SUPER INTEL I7
NOW
West Coast:
Before: average 84 fps
After: average 129 fps
Other maps:
Before: average 112 fps
After: average 167 fps
IT WORKS ONCE AGAIN!
3:45 west coast USA how it thought Italy was the one
thanks, gained a lot of fps with my boomer old gtx 1050 ti
Its not impossible to match monitor refresh rate when its 75hz 🗿🗿🗿
it went from 112 fps to average 280 fps thank helped a lot
Woow! I gotta follow your step by step Muye ❤❤ hope it works 100% successfully 💕💕💕
starting was about 75 to 80
ending is: 70
fps limiter is good for 1 thing, stability, just put it in your average FPS or a bit lower and you will solve the stability issues i was getting
I went from an average of 6 fps to an average of 15 fps thank you!
I got a Core i7 3770k, 12GB RAM (One 4GB RAM Stick broke) GTX 660 Ti Power Edition and average 30FPS on "Normal" Settings. After this video I get around 50 - 60 FPS on the more low end settings, But I do plan on upgrading my GPU eventually to a GTX 1660 Ti or something like that for better performance without making my wallet scream.
EDIT: I did a bottleneck calculation with my PC, And I realized I need a better processor to have full use of the new GPU, I plan on moving to AMD at some point though! Meaning new PC All together, So probably a lot of money :/
west coast usa midrange
rtx 2060 (12g oc edition)
rysen 5 5600x
starting fps: max 56
after: max 102 avg 70
i tired the mid range optimization and it did absolutely zero difference
I was getting anxious about the video being actually serious and got worried that we lost the muye we all know and love
until 6:51
Starting fps: 11fps
Now: 23 average on west coast usa
Before average FPS: 70.6
After FPS: 102.1
Put Vertical Sync back on...down to solid 60 lol
thx now i have 60 flames per second instead of 300
I use Beamng Drive for Monster Jam and what I am about to tell you may give you a heart attack
*BIG MOD WARNING*
I have 123 mods, and probably more to come which isn’t that bad, at least for me, for MuYe he must be dying right now
I have a Intel i5 12, Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti and 8gb RAM, What settings is the best?
Hey man! I'm here to help! @Surel With these specs, I would recommend turning these graphics all to low, then turn off all effects without motion blur and bloom, set the lighting quality and shader, post processng, to low and turn all shadows on! I have a GTX 1050 but not a Ti only the 2GB model, I hope this helped, wishing luck!
i have a 75Hz monitor so 60 to 75 fps is good for me
finally. i can play beamng on my potato pc
😂😂😂 08:21 " mandare a far3 in cul0 the...."
Specs:
Win10
Intel Xeon equivalent to a i5 but with 8 cores and no integrated graphics
16gb ram
Nvidia gtx750 ti 4gb
Specs are between low and potato
Before: 22fps on wc usa
After: 30fps
Important notes: I kept the dynamic reflection on.
Everything are on low, texture, shader and post process are lowest, shadows are partial and anistrophic are 4x, no AA, bloom, ssao, rays or dof, tires on 2000, vegetation on .60
Cpu 33%
Ram 62%
Gpu 100% (lol)
Low end settings: 80 fps max, 45 avg, 28 min
High end settings(almost max textures(dyn ref. Low)): 65 max 38 avg, 28 min.
Specs:
Gtx 1660 super 6gb +125mhz core, +500mhz mem, -150mv power core.
I5-6600 performace mode 3.61 ghz
1 ram module 16 gb cl17 2133mhz
Hdd wd 7.2k rpm sata 3
Windows 10 on ssd sata III 600mb/s
Ask questions if you need.
I can't tell if this is a serious video or not, but those "intensive maps" are very dependant on where your bottleneck is more likely to be, and do you have AMD or NVIDIA. For example, on my CPU bottlenecked system with AMD graphics, West Coast USA and Italy are actually perfectly playable, meanwhile in Hirochi Raceway I get under 30 FPS often, no matter what graphical settings I use.
Also, DO NOT disable G-Sync or FreeSync, especially if you get lower than your monitor's hz. Those technologies adjust the monitor refresh rate so the game will feel smoother and there won't be any tearing.
I don't know why, but with a RTX 3060 6GB, 16 GB of RAM, and an external HDD, i get (with Mid range settings) choppy fps that goes from 80 to 13 in a nanosecond, and always slows down. same thing for low end settings, but i get choppy fps that go from 107 to 15. Anybody know what the problem is?
Do i have to reinstall the game on my internal SSD instead?
Edit: I tested this on the West Coast USA map. Also, with a different car the game ran smoother??
My PC has
Intel 7 -7700
ram ddr4 - 48gb
m2. ssd samsung 960 pro
GeForce 1080
Frankly I had issue with Ram when I had 16gb and I added 32gb and no issue at all.
I am updating to laptop
MD Ryzen 9 5980HX,
64GB RAM,
1TB PCIe SSD
Radeon RX 6800M 12GB
but I will try your advices thanks!