Galaxy S21 Ultra vs Xperia 1 III Camera Test! | VERSUS
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
- Can the new #SonyXperia1III camera compete with the camera of the #GalaxyS21Ultra? We tested the most important video and photo features in daylight and night conditions in a direct comparison to make it easier for you to decide, which of the cameras suits you the best. Our tests include: Portrait mode, all the different cameras (ultrawide, wide, zoom, macro and front), slow-motion feature, night mode, as well as tests revolving the auto-focus, the optical image stabilization and the microphone. Let’s see which of these two high end smartphones, the Sony Xperia 1 III or the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, is the best.
Subscribe to our Channel: th-cam.com/users/versusdotco...
Check out our social media 👇
Instagram: / versus_comparisons
TikTok: / versus_com
Facebook: / versusio
Sam's Instagram: / samgo.co
For more details check out #VERSUS 👉 versus.com/en/samsung-galaxy-...
Get the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra here 🛒
amzn.to/2MAFA2y
Get the Sony Xperia 1 Mark III here 🛒
amzn.to/3jT42uf
Gear we use to make videos 📷
Camera: amzn.to/2RuWSgC
Lens: amzn.to/3c3h4ji
Mic: amzn.to/3ntp5Cz
Main light: amzn.to/3iBDEln
Second light: amzn.to/2FIJVgy
What happens in this 🔎
0:00 Intro
0:50 Video feature
1:39 Zoom video
2:10 Stabilization
2:16 Macro video
2:23 Auto focus
2:50 Slow motion
3:05 Microphone test
3:28 Portrait photo
5:18 Zoom photo
6:13 Macro photo
6:26 Photo comparison
6:50 Night mode photo
7:14 Night mode video
*All Amazon links above result in a commission given to me by Amazon. It costs nothing extra to you though. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 73 | คู่เอก "วรพล vs พันฤทธิ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rrOljlqse3A/mqdefault.jpg)
As a hobby photographer, I mostly disagree with your opinion on the pictures. Samsung seems to follow a certain look on their pictures with oversaturated colors, high HDR, higher contrast and a lot of added sharpness. Only because it's popular doesn't mean that the images are technically superior. I don't want to start a debate, whether smartphone cameras should follow a strongly stylized look, but I feel like in your evaluation of the images, the line between hardware capabilities and personal preference in terms of look are a bit blurry.
I would like to mention a few examples where I disagree with your opinion:
0:05 If you take a look on the right part of the Samsung image, you can see that the jeans material has an unrealistic amount of sharpness while an effect is applied, that is generally known as dehaze. Also, the colors are much warmer than they are supposed to be, if you compare the image with the reference video. On Sony on the other hand, HDR is worse but colors are more accurate and the hue of the background comes much closer to the reference video. It generally looks like the video could use a touch of color grading in post to reach the stylized look of the reference clip.
1:00 You say that the Samsung is generally much sharper and for the Sony it looks like a softening filter is applied. I think it's rather the opposite. While the Sony has the general lack of sharpness that most smartphone cameras come with, Samsung hides it by applying a lot of digital sharpening. So much, that the image is on the brink of falling apart. To much sharpness is generally most noticable on smaller details, such as the trees in the background behind the building. Again, the colors are oversaturated, especially the red. If you like the look, good for you, but applying digital sharpness doesn't mean one brand has natively sharper optics. Furthermore, I wouldn't agree that the Sony's colors are unrealistic. If you compare the colors of the leaves at 1:20, Samsung seems to have an unrealistically bright shade of green, while Sony portraits also some yellow in the leaves. Also with Samsung, you can see the higher contrast on the lamppost, which makes the graffitti unrecognizable and also on the lady's clothing. In this scene, it is also interesting to compare the sharpness on the ground. To me it looks like Sony takes the lead regarding sharpness in this specific still.
1:38 In this still, Samsung is obviously oversaturated an also oversharpened on the shirt. The rest is just personal preference about contrast and white balance.
3:48 I agree, that Samung has a higher dynamic range, but I just want to mention, that, while it ist technically better, the high HDR look isn't always appreciated. Images can start to look unnatural and clinical, if HDR is to high. On some occasions you might start to loose the feeling for the lighting situation, if absolutely nothing is overexposed, i.e. you loose the highlights between the tree branches, that look great in the bokeh. And on these two pictures, I actually appreciate that Sony keeps the flare on the lower right hand corner, as it was in fact a sunny day. In my opinion, Sony also has a more realistic digital bokeh. On Samsung it's an unrealistic kind of softening, as there is no texture left. Most real cameras will probably produce a result that comes closer to Sony's version of the bokeh.
3:53 IMO Sony is not to bright nor to flat. I think it's just realistic, if you want to capture the light of a sunny day, but maybe that's just personal preference. On Samsung, I think it's again oversaturated and the artefacts around the collar of the shirt are more noticeable compared to Sony, i.e. on the right side of the neck.
4:01 I agree, but I'd like to mention that Samsung again applies an unrealistic amount of sharpening to the side of the head. Also, the flaws of the seperation of the background around the hair are much more noticeable on Samsung.
5:20 I think this is the prime example of the oversharpened and high HDR look Samsung is going for. The shade of blue of the sky might be personal preferenc, but I think we can all agree that the sharpness of the trees besides the street is (again) unrealistic on Samsung.
6:13 While the Samsung obviously has a lower minimum focal distance, I think the image quality is just poor compared to the sony. Samsung has a very shallow plane of focus at this distance, which makes the borders of the coin appear unsharp. The contrast is quite poor and in the upper part of the image you can see noise in the shadows at the ceiling. While Sony has a worse reproduction ratio for macro photography, it manages contrast, colors and sharpness much better and i find the seperation of the background much more satisfying.
6:37 On this picture I'm quite disappointed with your evaluation. Sony manages to reproduce the actual color of the flower, which is pink, much better than samsung and even displays the gradient between white and pink and the the leaf veins in the upper part of the flower very accurately. The seperation of the background looks natural and has no artefacts. Samsung, on the other hand, decides flower=red and looses almost all the details I mentioned above and adds way to much sharpness. Just look at the separation of the background on the lower part of the flower. You can really see the border of the added sharpness. I really wish you would consider these factors and not just the dynamic range when comparing these two pictures.
6:55 Again, to much sharpness on the trees an the image is way to bright for nighttime.
7:05 Sony captures the lighting situation way better, while Samsung is making night look like daylight. It's perhaps a personal preference, but Sony delievers the more realistic picture.
This isn't supposed to be a hate on Samsung. If you like the looks of their camera software then go for it. I just wanted add my opinion about the technical differences between the images, I feel like you didn't mention. If it seems like I'm biased, because I only praise Sony, please remember that I only commented on the pictures/videos on which I disagree with your opinion. I have to admit that in terms of video stabilization, zoom, resolution and HDR Samsung is mostly superior. It's just that I not a big fan of their image processing.
Some people mentioned, that Sony's time to shine is mostly in manual mode. And while I agree with that, it's not the point of my comment. I just wanted to reflect on the evaluation of the images shown in this video.
Bruh I ddnt read all the paragraph, but you right
you are right sir, when we watch comparison, make sure from the profesional photographer, not from smartphone reviewer.
dude been typing for his life
Totally agree with you…. He looks like a supporter of samsung and doesn’t see how realistic sony is
I'm a shop owner i sell phones I've tried many of these devices but i always end up with sony because many phones company tend to edit a picture for you they make it the way they want you take a picture in the evening it looks like in the afternoon you take a colored object the picture looks like AI generated but with the Sony every picture i take looks the same as the way it was if i want to add something to the image i put it the way i want even editing Sony pictures its easier but when you try to edit a an image that is alleady edited it just becomes worse, i sell phones but many customers prefers the edited photos because they look unreal just as how many people are these days, but those customers that prefers the sony phones many always knows what they are doing i liked your comment, read everything on it you really know what your typing and thats true everything you typed i agree with you 100.
in short:
S21: Best on point and shoot -> take less time and skill to produce good image
Xp iii: Best in Pro mode (full manual control) -> require more time and skills but produce best result
Depend on what you need, both of them best in their respective area.
Have you ever seen Samsung's pro mode?
@Nev i have several samsung phone and i,ve also used pro mode in samsung phone. if you have used dslr camera you'll know what i mean
@@ascomycotinazzz Indeed. I have an A7 and a A6000 and I owned a 550D, and Samsung's Pro mode is nothing more than manual mode in Sony's older models. The current Photography Pro in Sony's new devices is what I've always wanted.
I have s21u and is good but to compare with xp iii (pro mode)? Not a chance.
Ill still take samsung any day. Better everything except pro bla bla bla who cares bye.
Sony needs to be in Manual mode to unlock it's potential. Most youtube reviewers miss this, making it look bad. Since auto mode wasn't the focus of sony. Trust me the photos in Manual are Impressive.
In manual mode, it can match the Samsung & iPhone in auto mode. It's pretty sad. To match the sony quality, it's very easy for both. In video, the iPhone is so far ahead, it's not funny. Maybe 5 years ahead of Sony and 1-2 ahead of Samsung.
@@Henry_Jr_Watsson Disagree, the SOny can almost produce SLR like photos in manual
Accurate definitely not a point and shoot like iPhone and Samsung. Hopefully one day Sony does focus more on their auto settings so people can have the best of both worlds.
Not only impressive but they are also accurate ASF. No other brand comes this close to colour reproduction! I totally agree with you.
So.. for someone who doesnt know how to use the manual mode..only rely on auto.. xperia 1 iii is not for them?
Sony has its own view on what a final result should be. And I agree with them.
The photos that this phone took are like taken from a real camera. Blown on highlights and deep shadows are what our eyes see. In your night video for example Xperia is much better. The night looks like it is night, when Samsung looks like it's day with washed out colours.
If you switch to manual mode with it's pro apps on Xperia you can get the same result as the Samsung.
You TH-camrs are quick to take some photos in auto mode and say "yeah, Samsung is better"
No it's not. Your use is actually the problem here. The new Xperia phones are not intended for auto mode use, but even in auto I found the results very pleasing. Samsung's results are artificial
To me, Sony looks more natural compared to Samsunh
At 360 degrees samsung has better camera system, but i like much Sony, looks like a real camera
The whole point of Sony Xperia is to use their camera with manual apps - photo pro and cinéma pro. The basic photo/video app on Xperia is just there for quick shots. So comparing Xperia with s21 without using the pro apps isn't fair at all.
And if you include third party apps like mcpro24fps in the equation, this will be a total different conclusion. Sony Xperia HLG 10 bit HDR with manual control in mcpro24fps at 160Mbps is just insane...
S21 ultra also has manual apps..
@@rusirubatuwatta8731 and they both have Google...
Umm no sony xperia is a phone, that has extra features... You do realise galaxy ultra has Manual pro apps too right?
Pretty weak argument you have if you include 3rd party apps, that's not even part of your phone.
@@ReNoMellow yup..
Xperia 1 III was meant for pro photographers to play in the PhotoPro App but not for any regular user!
Other user just can use the normal camera app or gcam
XPERIA have so many options and neutral colors. And manual mod is fun to use. Hope slow mo to come back
Still don't know why SONY 960fps slow mo is still missing. That's why I'm still using Xperia XZ1 hahaha...
Xperia 1 mark i are the last sony smartphone that still have 960 fps slow mo
@@atlasone8369 960fps? nice. I'm currently using 1V(Second one...) and vert satisfied
4:05 how did you take that photo?
i thought sony have the 70mm lens for the real bokeh portrait, what did you shoot that photo with for that to happened?
In sony's portrait photos u look way young.
@versus Hello versus, could you tell me the brand of this glasses used in the video
At 1.40, looks like you did not use Cinema Pro for video, and also, seems to have HDR on, which on the default camera app, will give it a hazy hue. Remove HDR if you are using the default app for video and see the haze removed. As for photo, only the Xperia among the phone cameras can capture fast moving objects like running pets at 20 fps and not end up a blurry mess.
See an example of actual Xperia 1 III video taken with Cinema Pro: th-cam.com/video/Dxn3taVXe5s/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=iPhonedo
I really can't understand why Sony deleted the 960 FPS, I mean, they have been the first.
In the meanwhile the Xperia had some updates, maybe you should do a new test
I love the quality of your videos. Greetings from Mexico!!!!
sorted out with iPhone, now Samsung is next) interesting, it will be further ... well, there are no rivals left there ... yes, with Samsung it will be the most difficult
Anyone know ... the best mi11 (snapdragon 888) or samsung s21 (exynos) phone.is there a better one? It's not a joke, well .. Please tell
Hi there, i wish If this function will ever come with future phone or is it possible with app, is to hold the phone in portrait mode and the recording can be in landscape. Hope you can put some light on this....
i finally decided to order an s21 ultra (from the phone company i always order my phones on) but when it arrived and i opened it up, imedately i noticed that be back panel felt VERY weak and cheap.
i sent it back, ordered one on the offical samsung website but also this one had the same issue.
especially since the s21 is so very expensive i don;t want to accept this.
can you please tell me if this is normal ?
am i too picky or am i right for not wanting to accept this ?
It’s not acceptable if the back panel is lose or feels cheap to you. If you know what you’re purchasing or have checked it with others or seen and tested a device at the store, and if the device you received is faulty, then you’re right to return it.
Sony is not meant to be left on auto. Use the manual mode and play with the camera...
yes, I must admit here Samsung was better in almost all scenes .. interestingly, other reviews are not so sad .. but in general s21 ultra yes, probably one of the best smartphones is still .. judging by these videos, photos
S21 is good phone no doubt but i got Xperia 1 iii and I’ve captured amazing shots. This guy did it no justice. He just use too the typical point and shoot
The S21 Ultra does indeed have a great camera so as the Xperia 1 III. There are some user errors here and there, that's why it looks worse than it actually is in this comparison.
Applause to another !mbec!l that intently forgets how important are manual settings and true photography not id!otic processing for same quality ppl... Xperia is not for on/off cameras but for very detailed touches that really can make the differences. As he has that same nzy !mbec!l tone, that says a lot: stay away from p!imp!ie reviews like this!
th-cam.com/video/MTW6E5fyFSE/w-d-xo.html
same scene
Sony Xperia 1 III not bad phone IV needs more mp cameras.
2017 Xperia XZ1 960fps 1080p super slow motion Sony is King 🤗
😂😂
One mark 3 can do 960 fps slow mo
Sony is dead now.
Nokia 6300 😏is the best...
sony is dead lol 😂
My Xperia XZ Premium does 960 FPS at 720p also. It is almost like taking a photo and it plays back at normal speed. Later Xperia XZs also do it at 1080. By now they are cheap enough on eBay as long as you don't want the latest model. Also note that the cameras are different, the Samsung is using a 108 MP camera. Sony does make image sensors found in many phones. I have seen a phone with a 48 MP Sony image sensor (not quad pixel which results in a smaller but sharper 12 MP photo). Does Sony make a phone with more than a 23 MP camera? They easily could since they make their own image sensors and even sell them to other manufacturers.
Your name is sam and we are cheering from india ❤️❤️
Make video on pro mode on both because sony is most concerned on professional and even s21 ultra have dope that feature. Do comparison on that
These are not the only phones in market that provides manual controls. a large number of cheap mid range phones have built in manual mode. also there are countless third party apps that can provide great manual camera controls."
@@andreydavydov6417 You clearly never use the xperia 1 III itself. The professional mode on other phone is not the same with the photo pro app on the xperia.
@@iwancarnifex nahhh I'd rather use my mirror less camera instead and its much cheaper than the phone itself........
Did you even use the massive Sony software for the camera or just snap stuff
We will do a video where we use the Pro application, but in a direct comparison we believe that the two phones should have equal standards. Even if there is a special app for the Sony, the auto mode should be improved.
I disagree. Technology acceleration is quick in a world where hardware is available to anyone that wants to buy it to make whatever they want. Software is not so in the same way, so software is king. Like comparing some Samsung phones a few years back to apple phones, apple used Samsung parts, but the software was different. Think molicules, everything is the same, it's how it's used that makes the difference.
@@Versusdotcom then tell me,if they must have equal standards,why Samsuck dont have 4K screen, where is Hi res audio with 360 ° spatial sound unique experience, where is 3 year guaranty battery life in Samsuck,where is sd card slot, a 3.5mm headphone jack, free expensive best Sony wired or wireless headphone?Where is all of this in Samsuck for same price of phone?Do not be so obvious Samsuck fan!
The last photo of the flower the flower was over saturated and as far as I could tell stabilization was pretty equal. In other reviews the Sony always won for this feature. I just got the Sony and am very pleased with it though this camera review is pretty spot on. Xperia screen needs to be brighter. And the screen does have issues with going back and forth from horizontal and vertical it's odd it only happens sometimes other times it's flawless. That was how my iphone 7 was though. You also need to keep in mind the magic of the Xperias camera is in pro mode where you set shots up but can also save settings for specific environments allowing point and shoot within that environment (or with only slight adjustment). Xperia doesn't have a dedicated night mode so there's no way it's competing with the Samsung. The draw backs on the Sony are all software maybe they will fix them. But Sony specifically made the phone this way and I doubt it. Sony is a stubborn company apparently. Refused to do any real promotion of this phone. There's no reason to have these drawbacks. Make the basic mode just like everyones point and shoot and then keep pro mode how you designed it. Oh if you want 5G on the Xperia in the us you will need Verizon or T-Mobile. I have At&t and I only get LET and it drops in certain areas which is weird because LET on my iphone never dropped. This is part of the reason Sony needs to stop not appealing to everyone. Ok you made a profit in 2017 for the first time in like a decade off your phones maybe you should just put a night mode in it and fix the software bugs. You're not beating Samsung in zoom and that's ok but macro can be fixed digitally with software. I bought your phone to support you now support me
I'm also pleased with the phone. Not sure with the Android 12 update though. My only problem that remained since I bought it was the audio on youtube vids or streams sounds quite robotic. Did you also notice the same? They have also broken 1 handed mode on Android 12. Sony is indeed a stubborn company. I have sent them videos of glitches and problems with the PC software and they have ignored it so far only to offer a repair of the handset (really?).
My guy I love your video it has good content but you should know that the 960fps slow motion video was started by Sony and copied by Samsung and you didn't even mention the fact that the Sony can also do 960fps slow motion at 1080p.
Second thing is, this comparison is strictly based on auto mode. Sony also offers Photo Pro app and Cinema Pro app that allows users to take full control of the camera and produce a higher quality video/photo which are 2 great features for professional photographers/cinematographers.
based on your comparison I do see where Samsung is leading on the Sony but I also think more examples are needed from both phones in more light conditions to determine which is better because 1 photo of each condition is just isn't that convincing, let alone the fact that on the contrary, on a lot of photos Samsung is the one looking over-sharpened and over-saturated if anything the Sony was under-saturated. I do love Samsung videos/photos but with effort the Sony can look as good and even better, and with its more natural colors and sharpness, it gives it in my opinion an advantage over the Samsung since it looks less phone camera quality and more DSLR level of quality, even being less saturated or sharp. I do agree on alot of photos Sony looked like it was a 2 year old phone.
Again, great video I love the comparison, I'm not intending to hate or that I'm a Sony fan or a Samsung hater but a deeper dive into details would have been more satisfying.
Afaik Sony removed the 960fps option. Now regarding pro mode, Samsung also has it.
It could be said that the Samsung is too sharp on some of those video tests. Sony looks more natural when though it is flat.
Sony could do with some HDR auto I think. It's available in pro photo mode at least.
They really need a night mode
too sharp is more preferable for further editing :)
Both are best in their segments , but I choose the Samsung Galaxy.
PhotoPro Auto is better in my use 👌 Watched on my Sony Xperia 1 III 👍
Weldone Mr Versus
Good job Sir
Beast Video bro.......seriously damn good.....
Super video, May be the only one that shows the portrait mode for the Sony
I agree with all of the other (you know which) comment states but let me give you my simplified take on this (I'm also into DSLR camera Photography) , basically this comparison is for point and shoot cameras, which camera will give you the most acceptable results most of the time, because, let's be fair, most people only wants that, to take a snap and have the snap be good, that's it, in that aspect I do agree that Samsung produces better results. But the Sony Xperia phones are not targeted or marketed towards the general public, their target market is the people who know about photography and videography, the software in the xperia is mostly the same to real DSLR Sony Alpha cameras, so with the right tweaks and in the right hands it produces beautiful pictures that the Samsung will not be able to compete with. It's just that, it's not point and click. In other words, it is as if you were comparing A good point and shoot camera with a Mirrorless Camera, the first one is meant for the average consumer, and the second one will be fit for pro photographers, I mean you handle a DSLR camera yourself, you can agree that if you just use auto or the wrong settings your photos come out terrible... Anyway, Xperia phones are more like an accessory or companion for people that are already into photography it was not meant for the general public, you can see a video of a concert I took with the Xperia 1 iii, on manual mode, 4k, 2.4 aperture and 300mm which is around 5x, and compare it with the one in the low light video here, you tell me if the video I took with the right settings looks like the one taken on this video with auto: th-cam.com/video/r7zUwhjPYvk/w-d-xo.html
My interest and craze is for human face photography in which I think in this wonderful camera review by you in 90% of your human face photos sony experia wins as it beautifies your face quite naturally despite being blurry in some cases. But in other cases one can see samsung wins in 80% of projection and visualisations of scenes and sights.
Natural? Go take the same picture with an Sony A7s. Those pictures look like the Samsung & iPhone pictures. Sony A7s is awesome. Sony phone is poop.
Dont u try pro Mode for Sony? I still cant accept why sony should have more Better picture on Pro Mode. But i want to see from u
Can you do a manual mode vs between this 2
Nailed it dope man 👌
Good comparison 👍
Underrated tech TH-camr
It is amazing how Samsung can shoot 4k video from its both the 10mp cameras... Its just crazy that NONE EVER on the whole youtube or any other website ever pointed this out that it is impossible to shoot 4k video on a 4:3 aspect 10mp sensor. Samsung has been doing this for years now. The front cam on the s10/note 10 series could shoot 4k30p on front 10mp camera. Mind Blown...🤯
Samsung always king of camera
Xperia colors in videos and portaits are much better than samsung. not natural but much better. looks like colors of an iphone camera
Samsung is great when it comes to dynamic range and processing portrait but the colors need to be adjusted.
sony best
Hands down to S21 ultra, sony xperia 1 iii only promote the pro mode but lets be honest most of phone users rely on automatic mode
Let's be honest, it's down to personal preference. Plus, when people buy phone, they decide on what the phone can do in general and not because auto is good. Good auto mode is a bonus, but it's a phone and not a camera.
It’s a matter of fact that almost nobody shoots on manual mode, so it’s quite obvious which smartphones people will choose, but the Sony is still a beast for professional users
Yes, Sony does not care about the average users hence their sale is growing very slow.
Well Sony can shoot Auto in Pro mode which produces much better results than Basic mode
@@NationChosenByGod really? Or dumb users does not want to be smart to try the phone?
Xperia!
Video watched on my S21 ULTRA
The reason why many people want Samsung is because no one wants to put in the work. Sony gives you a raw/natural image and then up to you what you want to do. Samsung on the other hand is for vloggers, social media users who care more about the light of an image and want to just put on effects and off they post. It's a different market. I am a person whose photography focuses on natural so I'll choose a camera that shows exactly the scene
Loved samsung S21 ultra camera with natural colour. Hey versus you have given away one s21 ultra still you have another. What about this one giveaway 😁😁😁
th-cam.com/video/MTW6E5fyFSE/w-d-xo.html
its just a same scene?
If natural's you're going for I'm sure Xperia is way above S21
I think s21 ultra is better
Sony is much more accurate in the shots taken, especially when professionally set it in the App. Alot of people will say most brands look better then Sony in auto mode, wich is entirely true but its only because they are more "vivid" and inaccurate compared to Sony. And thats what our eyes like. Vivid and punchy pictures. But thats not always the case for anyone. If you start taking professional pictures, you dont want to go back to a vibrant anf unnatural picture.
Sony uses Alpha camera processing in their phones, so it gives you an unparalleld natural image, as close to what you really see. Its the same with their TV's. Those are the closest to the D65 whitepoint reference as it can be out of any brand.
S21 ultra has better dynamic range too.
Sony is all about manual mode. Auto modes are for normal user. If you are normal level camera user then you can take Samsung and you are pro level camera user then you should go to Sony. Sony's auto camera features aren't good but manual camera is great, and Samsung 's auto and manual camera has no significant difference at all.
ive been a sony fan . with this video sonys good in brightness and samsung in color. in this overall im going for samsung when in comes to performance. i never used samsung. thanks for this vid.
Glad you could take something useful out of our video! 🙂
been waiting for the p50 pro 😁 and the giveaway results too!!!
We announced the winners on Instagram and Facebook 😉
in portraits s21u, always put blur level to 3 or 2... much more natural bokeh
Thank you for the nice comparison! I'm very happy with my Samsung galaxy s21 ultra! Btw, where is this comparison filmed? It looks like a very beautiful place!
Well the best places in photography in Europe but I think he is from UK
Thank you! :) We are based in Berlin
@@Versusdotcom what how lol I was wrong because your English is just perfect
Galaxy sucks. Better use a case or it'll break into pieces. Also lack of headphone jack.
@@techocrazy wtf so you telling me other flagships made of iron? Do they has 3.5 Jack ? You just lost think before talk please
Good video👍👍
Try to compare both phones in manual mode and you will see the big difference.
I completely disagree...I rather not have a blurry background in my pictures that's why I do prefer the SONY photos besides SONY has always been focus into showing pictures as we see them in real life.
Samsung Galaxy s21 ultra is best camera sir
2nd 😍 biggest fan of💓 VERSUS
Clear win for the Samsung
Sony looks great! Love those colors!
But here sony's video is kinda gimme a cinematic look while s21 is jsut a normal high vivid filter applied
man I will have to disagree... the sony one looks like it's been shot from a dslr with high aperture settings... not too saturated.. no much sharpness... shooting with xperia and increasing the sharpness and adjusting the highlights and contrast..you can get the samsung look...
I don't understand why thses phones are underrated.. i love them.. about to get one...
excited
I love this versus channel..
thank you 😊!
Galaxy - Pixel Binning - Slow Focus
Sony - 12mp without Binning, Sharp fast focus.
And, you have to use the "Feature made for Sony" to get more out of the device.😊
Every time you click with samsung you hot more saturated colors but sony will stick with orignal colors....and that is more important
Sony Xperia 1 III is good for camera if you click photo with sony xperia 1 III it's not look very good you need to edit it because it's provide you detail ok. (Sony Xperia Series phone are not for that like all things auto do viedo or photo graphy with pro mode then you see the unique thing)
Hello Versus, i hope i can get an autograph from you, follower here in the Philippines... best review idol...
Use xperia 1 iii reply: Sony is the best
Le 1 mark 3 peut aussi filmer en 960fps
Apparemment nooon c'est dommage nooon
@@thoraudin2664 oui effectivement j'ai dis une connerie
I'm just loving my s21 ultra ,works pretty fine with camera focusing system.
Xperia is my choice! It's more well rounded and the manual camera is the best feature not to mention the screen!
lol
Sorry but I have to comment on the Rose. I for one think it's fine on the Sony, although highlight is a bit much. The petals has still details. As compared to Samsung, the colors drowned the details in Galaxy. The bokeh is natural as well, although there is no bokeh effect added in Sony
When shooting close objects, the Samsung switches to ultra wide cam to provide more depth of field. You can turn that off.
Samsung S21U will give you more bokeh as it's got a larger and as a result more advanced/capable sensor than the Xperia.
@@DeepteshLovesTECH the point is, the Rose one, I don't agree that Samsung shot was way better.
S21 mejor en procesado en general, aunque en algunos casos prefiero el look del xperia, tal vez sea en parte el lente y en parte ese toque cinemático.
El xperia es mejor
Sony que mas.caro
Please review iphone 13 pro max vs sony xperia 1 III.
thank you
Of course, the moment we get our hands on it!
2 things are truly hate in camera comparisons vs the Galaxy S21 Ultra. 1, in slow-mo category, the Galaxy has regular slow motion and "Super Slow-Mo" which was used in this vid. You HAVE to mention the regular slow motion because everybody doesn't want Super Slow-Mo. And 2, many TH-camrs complain the Galaxy has too much blur but always fail to mention that you can literally adjust the blur to your liking.
So annoying.
Whoa Sony is great color ranges dynamic sharpness more of it Sony still leader
🤣
Well the camera of samsung is using fluorescent light that can handle the balance of color and brightness of the camera that the image looks sharp and colorful on auto mode.
And I see the camera of the sony is over exposed didn't adjust correctly the EV while taking a photo, so that need to adjust it for the better image.
So samsung is good for the person who dont need use pro camera just takes a selfie or photo that they like and post it. And the sony is good for profesional or a person who take photo seriously for the better quality image.
S21 Ultra Snapdragon or Exinos?
It has the Exynos chip
I am a scuba diver thinking of buying the Sony with seatouch 4 housing
damn the Sony just looks so much better in the first video comparison, that 'softness' is what sets it apart, makes it look like it was shot on a DSLR or mirrorless. High end computation is impressive but will always be inferior to properly captured image data imho.
Sony needs to step up their computation game and everyone else needs to step up their raw imaging game.
The rest of this comparison is kind of pointless... because your comparing computational to non-computational imaging with no PP. You mention a few times that the Sony is over-saturating colours when it's clearly the other way around, not sure if that was just a mix-up on your end or if you're high as a fucking kite. As well as calling Samsung's night mode 'brighter' and Sony's 'darker' when the statement you were looking for was 'over-compensated artificial dynamic range, which makes it look terrible' and 'zero dynamic range compensation, which makes it look terrible' respectively. You should have used manual mode on both phones for.. well everything but the nighttime stuff especially, both are capable of much better.
I m really disappointed bcz you have not used PRO CAMERA in sony
What would that change? Samsung has a pro mode too. Keep in mind a pro mode won't fix the main issues sony has like dynamic range and sharpness. Keep making up excuses. The s21 ultra is literally a cheaper device too
@@propersod2390 dont compare sony pro mode with samsung,go and watch other channel videos and then you would come to know what is Sony
@@propersod2390 It has so much features,a normal person like you cannot use that . This phone is for professional photographers,not dumbs like you.
@@propersod2390 btw sony makes more than 70% camera sensors in world market
@@keshavchandan9498 Can u tell me what the difference between samsungs and sonys pro mode is? 😂😂😂😂 Also u can just download a "pro" camera app from the play store...
And so what if sony sells a lot of camera sensors? The companies that use the sensors actually know how to make a smartphone camera while sony doesn't. Samsung is the #1 semiconductor manufacturer in the world and yet I don't see them making the best chipsets on the planet or something?
Really bad comparison, it's clear as day that the xperia is being used in auto mode. It should be used in pro mode, that way you unlock all the capabilities of the camera and that makes a HUGE difference.
Brother love from Bangladesh
I really like this guy's review of the camera part 🤝👌💪
Without using photo pro?
Indeed.
Imagine first camera phones🤔
S21 ultra again camera king💯
Focus has been the best with the s21 ultra
60% photos are better and more nature look on Xperia 1 III, and still Samsuck dont have 4K screen, 240Hz touch response and 240Hz motion blur for gaming, best experience in gaming,Samsuck dont have a 360° Hi res audio, LDAC,and sd card slot or 3.5mm headphone jack.. And guess what?Samsuck dont have FREE CHARGER like any Sony Xperia phone. 😀
You would have lower down the exposure little bit on xperia in portrait pics.
There's no HDR in portrait mode
@@pixels_per_inch we don’t need hdr every time bro.
Sony Vin 💪💪💪😍😍
🤣
S21 ultra is 👍
Xperia best
What do somy think Look for the other Smartphone sony I request
S21 ultra is on another level
Hahaha camera of s21 ULTRA SO SO BAD
SONY XPERIA 👍👍👍👍⚡⚡⚡
Wow i didn't expect that s21 would be that much better than Sony 😳
Brother it’s Samsung fanboy
other camera reviewer told that the samsung photos are over saturated and sony produce natural colours this guy telling apposite review..samsung fanboy
@@pavannaik8682 idk ,but in this test Sony missed many shots
@@zanstkalkany2023 pls check other camera review videos about 1 mark 3...
Love from india
Giveaway please
We just finished a big one, mate 😄 But keep an eye open in the future