He seems like a good guy just because he’s not reveling in her self-destruction, like I ABSOLUTELY would have been. If I was him, I would be stifling laughter. But he just seems uncomfortable the whole time, and he doesn’t have any interest in destroying her as a person. He’s there for the right reasons, for the kids.
Sarah Leyva Pike was arrested in Maine and extradited to Amelia County, VA on charges of solicitation of the murders of circuit court Judge Joseph M. Teefey Jr., his wife, attorney Brooke Teefey, and Amelia Sheriff Ricky Walker, making a threat in writing, and another threat to bomb or burn a public building. In Nov 2023 she requested a jury trial. At that hearing, the case was continued to Jan 25 and 26 for the trial. --> And that is how she is doing right now. Father has the children; they are safe, happy, and loved. She has no contact.
and there are posters all over the news articles proclaiming her innocence and that the charges are “retaliation “. She obviously has a group of other crazies behind her.
New update; An Amelia County woman has pled guilty to two felony threat charges after months of threatening Facebook posts, emails and phone calls made towards the Amelia County Sheriff’s Office, an Amelia judge and others. Levya was sentenced to five years on both felony convictions, with all but six months suspended.
this kind of laugh is a reaction that I have as well sometimes when I get bad news or a string of bad luck. it is not enjoyment and more of a feeling like "of course it had to be like that, it couldn't have worked out just once" hard to describe properly.
Unfortunately, this mother will likely try to create chaos wherever she goes. She doesn’t realize that she is ultimately just hurting herself while pushing others away. I’m glad that the father has full custody of the children.
Her extreme narcissism is what’s driving her. She absolutely thrives on the attention, regardless of who’s giving it to her. A group of sadistic killers could be giving her attention and she’d still preen and peacock to get their focus.
The fact that she's been charged with solicitation for murder against a judge and their family is just wild. This woman is more dangerous than I could have imagined
She pled to felony threats and got 5 years , serving 6 months and 4 and half suspended. She still has a case open in TX too, for the same thing... She'll have to behave now that she's on paper
What's even more dangerous is that there are people out there that have bought into her lies and deceptions. She has a whole group of supporters that are harassing her ex, his family, the attorneys, the case workers, the court legal staff, etc. She truly believes that she has been wronged and that everyone involved in this case (other than her) has colluded to "kidnap" her children and "traffic" them for immoral/illegal purposes. It's downright frightening to think that she walks among us and that there are others like her!
I disagree… her interruptions are strategically placed to destroy the flow of her opponent. So far.. she’s been pretty successful at delaying cases while costing a ton of money….
@@robynhickman5083 Nah, actually she needs to just shut the hell up. In the first hearing, she consistently interrupted everyone else and yet when one of the attorneys interrupted HER when she was speaking she snaps back with “do not interrupt me when I’m speaking!” Something along those lines. She very clearly demonstrates that she expects to be treated above everyone else and is superior. It speaks volumes to her overall character.
I was in court a while ago (#NotyourLawyer) and another attorney had a hearing where a pro se respondent was just digging their hole deeper and deeper. But because I was in open court, I had to keep a poker face and literally bit my lip to keep a straight face. All I could think was “This person got their law degree from Google” and the respondent had nearly been thrown out of the court room by the judge
I just love it when people start talking over the judge and begin their statement with "With all due respect your Honor" when "due respect" is the last thing on their mind.
"With all due respect, your Honor" was one of Darrell Brooks' favorite sayings, close behind "Objection" and "Grounds?" and I cannot imagine anyone showing LESS respect for the judge than he did.
If she put half the effort into being a good mother as she did filing false claims, accusations and taking up the courts time she probably wouldn't be in this mess 🤣🤣
I think they just go down a conspiratorial rabbit hole and can’t climb out. They find an echo chamber of scorned people who cheer on each other with zero critical thought and just make it so much worse for themselves.
Was just about to write the same thing. Get help lady! Put that energy into getting counciling, be a good person/mom, get off drugs, etc...She is a Complete NARCISSIST who thrives off VICTIMHOOD with extreme paranoid delusions. Jesus I though my babies mom was insane.
It was certainly the case in McDonald vs McDonald out of Nevada. The father ended up serving prison time because of acts committed surrounding the divorce of his wife. Every day his children were away from their father was an absolute blessing to them.
I don’t know how it’s so easy to judge when we really don’t know I don’t think anyone should be without there children that long some supervision over visits something
@@patheticcircus3774 Her choice is to wast time playing stupid games in court and making unfounded accusations. She has chosen to be in a position where she cannot see her children. She played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
Clearly, many people in these comments have had little experience with "Childrens' Services" storming in (usually late at night) with the scantiest of evidence (if any) and ripping children -- crying and screaming in terror -- from their parents' arms. The entire system, with the intent of erring on the side of keeping children safe, judges the accused as guilty and requires them to then somehow prove their innocence against the tide that already has judged them guilty. Even Mike made the idiotic comment, "Oh yeah, then why don't you have custody of your kids?" as if that somehow proved guilt. These so-called childrens' "services" cause horrific trauma to the children and are never accountable for what they do. Anyone who pretends to know what is true here is just foolish. You don't. And anyone who pretends to know that the children are better off torn from their lives and their home to be thrown into the spin cycle of State custody is just ignorant. And if you are with the TRULY STUPID who believe that these self-righteous prejudging child kidnappers are never wrong, then disregard anything I have written because it won't reach a reasoning brain cell anyway.
Her statements “your Honor, you know what’s going on here and Ms Borum knows what is going on here” is such infuriating gaslighting. What a manipulative, miserable person
Can you imagine having her as your mother? If those kids haven’t seen her in a year, it is now in their best interest to keep it that way until they are 18. She is unbelievable.
@@michellefucoff4631 She is batshit fucking crazy. Do I think she should not procreate? Do I think they will take her kids. No. Can you imagine being her kids teachers? Parent teachers conference she comes in and starts accusing people of sex trafficking? Yeesh.
I think it's awful... That's their mother you show me a perfect human being in a perfect mother. I mean what's the standard for a mother to have her children? We all are just human and quirky
@@weadiamedia9331 My brother and I used to use such phrases, usually when describing a bad meal. Another common one was "coming down with a case of colon blow."
I wish the judge would be harsher with her when she interrupts because she’s not got any consequences except for the judge telling her to let the prosecutor talk. That’s not enough
The judge can charge her with contempt and arrange to have her picked up to go to jail. Or at least fine the shit out of her every time she interrupted
There is a way to interrupt the Judge without sounding rude, obnoxious, etc. But, you have to use it judiciously (pun intended). For example, when I need to interrupt the Judge to get my point across or to clarify a point, I say, "Excuse me, Your Honor, I apologize for interrupting, but/however I need to clarify/state/remind/add . . . ". Ms. Leyva Pike never seemed to have learned good graces or decorum during any of her dozens of court appearances. You cannot buy class or good sense!
I'm a law school graduate but couldn't hurdle the BAR exam, I randomly came across your videos after not caring much about law for well over a decade. Somehow several of your videos have peaked my interest so much haha.
She is so manipulative. That whole, "We all know," spiel is straight out of the narcissists playbook. And that fake cry at the end is absolutely hilarious.
Miss Angela, you are very insightful. I’ve never given much thought to how narcissists work, but thinking back to the actions of the “King of Narcissists” (my ex-husband), I realize that you’ve hit the nail on the head.
She’s using the fact that they’re Republicans to run a campaign against them on tiktok. She files affidavits against them then uses her own filings as evidence 😂
As someone whose job it is to work with trafficking survivors, it makes me so angry when people throw the word "trafficking" around as a buzzword to make things sound salacious. That said, this lady is beyond the pale. I cannot believe she doxxed people in legal documents. SMH
*The public seems not to understand that EVERY court filing essentially "doxxes" everyone associated with the case, from the litigants to the attorneys, to the witnesses, with very few [almost exclusively statutory] exceptions. The case file will, out of necessity, have the addresses of every person touched by the filings within the file. Service requires an address. Any Joe Sixpack can look at the full contents of almost any file, now on-line in most courts.*
When I saw her smiling reaction to the judge’s ruling it gave me a sense that she may love the fight for her children more than having them. The “Cause” gives her purpose and meaning which is reinforced by the approval of her friends, accolades from activists who use her and notoriety on social media. Toss in animus toward her husband and any judge or attorney that dares to defy her it is a pretty heady cocktail. Dopamine on the rocks with an adrenaline chaser.
She needs a continuous IV drip of Thorazine to shut her up for the next 96 hours. Start it on a Tuesday after a holiday Monday, then everyone can recharge their minds and bodies. Get away from this toxic waste of flesh for at least a week & and a half.She's worst than a record whose needle keeps skipping and repeats, skips and repeats, skips and repeats.
She's the type of person who is used to getting her way by talking over people and trying to intimidate them into silence. She doesn't realize that only works at the grocery store or with friends and family. But court is DESIGNED to disallow that to happen.
She thinks she's going to control her entire case. Her husband has obviously had a lot of practice being silent prior to the divorce and most likely had to relearn speech. I call people like her bullies, I'm sure she started on the playground
Yeah, she’s got all the time in the world to file all these motions and affidavits but she doesn’t have a job I mean come on. Probably living off the state getting food stamps. Certainly not doing what she needs to do to get her kids back.
I couldn’t agree more with these comments. Getting a job or two jobs plus mental health support & parental classes will definitely improve her chances of potentially seeing her kids back in the future.
Some are smarter. What they are lacking is knowing the court system (not to be confused with knowing the law) and knowing whose ass to kiss and how deeply. If you listen to this Law Talk Mike 90 percent of his complaints are she's not getting her nose brown enough. SHE'S TRYING TO RECUSE A JUDGE!!!!!! Butmunching the Judge will do absolutely no good, so she should come out guns blazing.
I sincerely felt her pain when she was talking about being fearful for the safety of her seven year old child. And I do not even have a child. This woman is scary enough on her own, much less having to worry about her "inspiring" any unstable third party that might read her wild accusations......
I think a lot of judges try not to mute participants unless they feel there's no other choice. And not out of a sense of masochism but so that later on the person doesn't have room to appeal. And to ensure that the parties are being treated equally no matter how dumb they are. Reason one thousand why I'm not a judge is that I probably would mute people way too soon then have the higher ups in the judicial branch would grumble I was too reliant on it.
Because they dont want to actually deny people the right to defend themselves. Plus people who represent themselves tend to get a lot more leeway than lawyers. While at times i think miting is justified it would defeat the purpose of creating a record.
She's got this idea that she's going to find a judge that will feel sorry for her!! Like a mother with Munchausen by Proxy, she's looking for a doctor to find something wrong with her child rather than a Dr that tells her that he kid is fine!😊
Oh this is a dumpster fire. You're told in law school, even if you specialize in family law to never represent yourself. Always get a lawyer. This is just depressing. Why people feel like self representation is better is mind blowing.
I have no problem believing this woman violated the terms of her custody agreement based on her behavior towards a judge and during court proceedings. She reeks of "I does what I wants!!"
Also, I don't feel bad, one little bit that she hasn't spoken to her kids in all that while.. however, I do feel bad for the kids that haven't spoken to their mother in all that while.. equation: mother + without own kids = tells you everything you need to know about her. No extra details required
From the outside looking in….what I’m not sure she realizes is that accusing everyone around her of not understanding or being wrong only makes her look worse. 😬
A child custody agreement is never "irrevocable" as the circumstances can change at any time which could require a change at any time in the best interest of the children which is clearly evident since she has had no contact with the children for a year
I love the look on the judges face when she says "you know exactly what's happening." When she says "trafficking children" she means taking them away from her. She really has no idea what chid trafficking actually is.
This girl is definitely not the brightest light on the Christmas Tree!! Does she know what sex trafficking implies or even what it is?? When your children are taken away from you because custody is granted to the father, that is NOT SEX TRAFFICKING!! She's just ridiculous, and I pray to God that she loses custody PERMANENTLY!!
This lady is spending waaaaayyy too much time Googling legal terms that don't apply to this case!! She's a freaking bulldozer trying to flatten anything and anyone in her way!!
When a judge lets you keep talking, they have most likely made up their mind and are just letting you prove you are plain WRONG! love watching professionals stay focused when against someone who thinks they can just annoy and talk their way into being right.
This broad is absolutely terrifying. She comes off as vengeful. It seems as though she will say and do anything about others to harm them in pursuit of her vengence. Nicolas, how did you find this gem? My sympathies. I pray for you, sir.
How did she have kids with her constant interrupting? It would have been difficult to complete the process of getting pregnant with her constantly saying “ wait, wait!” 🤣🤣🤣
She says that she "means no harm to the judge or the other attorney!" Yeah, then WHY DID YOU TRY TO MAKE THIS INFORMATION PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE?? She's just desperate to get this to go in her favor!! She needs to be arrested for that alone. She definitely meant to cause harm to the judge, the attorney, and anyone else that might get in her way!!
Seriously. The fact that she’s so insistent on keeping this from being sealed is insane and telling. It wouldn’t affect the case, she’s just trying to ruin his life.
She, as a non custodial parent takes the kids to another state. Then claims corruption when TX child services goes all the way to her new location, takes her kid(s) back to TX.
Just goes to show, be aware of who you decide to have children with. Don't rush into it. Otherwise you'll have someone like this awful woman to deal with for the next 18+ years.
@@TORTOISESFORDAYSgiven her more recent troubles, I don’t think that a successful career in law is in her future. She is very articulate, though and I could see some squandered potential in the midst of her batshittery.
@@gabrielalizarragacruz9158 yes ma’am. I’ve been an attorney for 25 years. I’m retired now and only do a small amount of consulting. Have a great day and take care. Xo
For what it’s worth - from Reddit: “Hi. I am a TH-camr who did a deep dive on Sarah's case for the purposes of supporting her I contacted her via email for a copy of the evidence folder she advertises on her TikTok and she provided it to me. Her story was extremely compelling however once I reviewed the documentation I dropped the entire project as I could not frame this in any way that would make her look good without lying about what I found. The Texas family court has a pretty bad reputation when it comes to seperating children from thier parents. A lot of these stories are absolutely heartbreaking. This is not one of those cases. The hardest part of sorting all of this out was figuring out how the things Sarah was saying during the hearings related to what was actually going on. She has a tendancy to skip steps in her thought processes which makes it difficult for 3rd parties to follow along. There is what she is saying, and there is what she means and the two do not always align unless you've studied the timeline, the court videos, as well as her social media posts. I will do my best to elaborate. For example, one of her videos is a hearing is to force the recusal of the judge overseeing her case however during the video she does not provide any legal justification for the recusal of Judge Wells. She instead attempts to retry her child custody issue starting from the arbitration agreement. That is not the purpose of this hearing but she believes that going higher up will get her the results she wants, but it wont. She keeps refering to the "irrevocable mediated settlement" that she claims gave her the right to take the children out of state. Sarah has provided this to me directly upon request via email and she is incorrect. Everything that followed stems from that primary fundamental misunderstanding. Had she clearly states her intentions the arbitrator would have advised that they cannot grant it as a matter of law. She believes a personally requested addendum written in vague language that she requested be added to the arbitration agreement supercedes Texas state law, which it doesn't. No child custody arbitration agreement allows one parent to take a child out of state without the other's knowledge or permission. She is wrong about this and refuses to move forward on anything else until a court agrees to this which will never happen. What she refers to as "perjury" from child services is thier "unwillingness to admit that she outsmarted the texas family court system" by adhering to state law instead of the vague language addendum she requested. She has also conducted herself in a mannor which a reasonable person can only presume to be bad faith. In addition to constantly interrupting the proceedings and threatening to have her ex husband shot when he drove to virgina to see the boys, she attempts to include family court employees home addresses in her filings despite having zero relevance to the case. Whether this was done for the purposes of harassment or not, it would facilitate the harassment of family court employees. She has shared the courtroom zoom link with another activist in her circle, who was completely unrelated to the case, so he could actively disrupt the proceedings. I also suspect that she was involved in a DDoS attack on her ex husbands lawyer's office in another effort to disrupt and deprive him of his lawful representation during a hearing beefore a judge. There are steps she can take to regain access to her children. She simply refuses to engage with those steps or take any action to get them back through the system which is why her original attorney quit. I have a copy of those texts as well provided to me by Sarah herself. She now believs that her former lawyer is also a part of the conspiracy against her. I have reviewed every document and I can only reasonably conceive of two possible scenarios: Scenario 1 - Sara Pike is extremely intelligent and dangerous person who has found a way hack the court system to harass her ex husband, as well as the court staff who have rightfully sided with state law, while falsely interjecting herself into an activist circle with legitimate grievances in order to garner personal attention and build a career as an activist. Scenario 2 - She is mentally ill and is being enabled by strangers online.”
You know, I find most cases with insane, intractable defendants like these typically have a critical stage at the proceedings where the defendant seriously misunderstood something critical (which they refuse to consider as a possibility), and everything else flows from there.
I clerked for a Family Law office in California, and it’s no different than Texas: it’s crazy the ease which they remove children for what seems no reason at all - then the parents are tied up in court for years to get them back. Definitely a system of law, nationwide, that needs a to be fixed.
So this Karen files a motion at every Judge who rules against her? She must REALLY get off on this. Sign of a complete sociopath. I see why she lost her children.
I don't think she is so much a sovereign citizen as she is an "amateur lawyer." She did some research, maybe consulted some online legal sources, and she has made what she feels is a cognizant and coherent argument. She also has an ulterior motive to prevent the case from being sealed. I think the motive is somewhere along the lines of vindictive public shaming of the father. She is attempting to set up a "gotcha" scenario but is doing so unsuccessfully. God Bless 🥰
In Arizona, you can hire a paralegal For seventy five dollars a visit To do all your paperwork and explain exactly how you need to present yourself in court So you can go pro se she probably did some form of that
The second judge and the attorney made me laugh when she went "you're commiting a felony right now, have fun trafficking children" and they just went "Ok, bye bye now" 😂
That usually drives me nuts too, but now I've seen a few instances, like this one, where I feel like it's at least somewhat intentional. It's as if the judge has some idea what kind of person they're dealing with (based on the previous motions, court interactions and that they're representing themselves) and the judge realizes the futility of responding as they would with any normal person in their midst, and also wants to allow the person to show themselves on record. Either way it requires some serious patience to deal with people like that.
Yes. I had to pay lawyer fees for at least 2 years extra because my ex-husband refused to comply with court orders, refused to hand in his documentation for discovery request while I immediately handed in mine. He also kept hiring and firing attorneys which delayed everything because each new one needed time to get to know the case. He lied repeatedly, even about things that we easily proved in court were straight out lies. He perjured himself many times. He never paid anything, he was penalized with fees that he just refused. It took me 2 years to save up to a lawyer's retainer so I could file for divorce, and during 5 years I have had to borrow and pay about $60,000.00 to pay my lawyer... My ex still refuses to pay... He has even left the country to avoid the court appointed back arrears and support. I am happy to finally have the divorce finished and the judge was fair; I just hope that I will get something of what he owes me. I'm living on disability, so there's very little money coming in. In spite of the judge's fairness, it has been devastating to see him get away with all his lawbreaking and procrastination in full view of the court... I wish that the judge would have put more pressure on him and his different lawyers. It would have saved me thousands of dollar.
If she is publicly accusing state officials of ignoring perjury and fraud up to the judges level then she is also implicating the local LEOs and CPS of harming her children. If she will not give out her address then she has already been harassed. 1 in 5 families have been targeted by CPS in Texas. They lose over 500 children per year in the system and can't find them. She is smiling because she more than likely has a federal lawsuit ongoing and she will add this judge to the list of conspirators to be investigated.
Right? She acts like she's not spreading false accusations! She's probably just mad that if the files are sealed then she can't use her 'child advocates' to harass people into giving her her way.
@@bluedragonfly8139 If someone is trying to steal her children then she has every right to confront the kidnappers, whether they work for the government or not.
I’m sure every judge she appears in front of has the same concern “Today is the day my clerk/stenographer walks out of the job”. What a headache of a human being 🤦🏽♀️
This just popped up today, watched the whole thing then looked her up. She was charged with soliciting murder (2 counts) among other things and extradited from Maine to Texas in November 2023. Today she plead guilty to some of the lesser charges in a plea deal. CRAZY!
This judge is giving Karen way too much leeway. Instead of shutting her down immediately, she lets her talk for quite awhile before telling her to wait her turn.
The judge is almost worthless. It took way to much time for her to shutdown the interruptions, and never got her stopped from butting in. The judge encouraged her to act this way.
I see it different I see it as she isn't doing herself any favours and letting her rabble on shows that she will b1tch complain and file anything to dirty everyone's name to clean hers but just my opinion
Totally agree, after the first or maybe second interruption, the Judge should have smacked her down hard, but instead allows her to continue interjecting, interrupting and arguing. Wait your bleeping turn.
I feel the most sorry for her children. She lost them for a reason, not because every judge and attorney in the hunt has waged a personal vendetta against her. If you go through her social media she does appear half crazy and unstable. My advice to her is to GROW UP AND STOP destroying your children, you don’t think you are having any negative affect on your children BUT YOU ARE. They will choose their father as they grow and stay away from you.
She could have lost custody just bc a judge got irritated and nothing to do with laws. Happens everyday. We see feelings interfere in any and all things that law is involved in.
As a retired prosecutor, I've had to deal with people representing themselves......thinking they are qualified after watching 4 episodes of Law and Order. One guy kept telling me that the testimony by the victim is not evidence. 🤦♂️so I told him verbatim thr definition of evidence and he still didn't believe me. So, I told him to ask for a public defender. He was reluctant. But I finally convinced him to let people who do this for a living do their job.
She seems more invested in fighting in court than actually getting her children back. I bet she never spent this much time and energy actually being a mom when she had her children, otherwise she would have never had them taken from her. She’s more focused on identifying herself as a victim of the court system than identifying as a mother.
That woman should’ve been arrested for contempt of court, liable, slander, harassment, and suspicion of child endangerment. Put her in general population and accidentally let it slip that she’s here for crimes against a child or children. I doubt anymore would be heard about her, not a loss
She’s in jail at this very moment for threatening a judge and his wife. I think everyone else in her orbit are the ones not safe, not the other way around
I am retired from almost 25 years of working child protection. I had to change my home phone # numerous times & had special security for my family at least twice. But the best story was an alcoholic father that belonged to a pre-sovereign citizen group. He would email the group leader w/cc to the rest of the group before hearings & after hearings. BUT... Somehow he got my work email mixed up in his cc list! So I got a copy of every email he sent out! And he was telling them some magnificent whoppers about what was said in court, what he'd done to comply with orders, and how the foster family was trying to steal his children by lying to the court! He had 3 children & failed to mention that 2 of them were over 16 and in independent living group homes and apartments, not in foster care w/foster parents who wanted to steal them. 🙄 The 3rd pre-teen had transferred to supervised relative care with a maternal aunt where disabled mom & her little dog, too, were also living. There was a no contact order between Dad, the children & their caregivers because he'd been arrested many times for being violent when drunk - which was most of the time. Finally even his group leader started questioning Dad's stories & offered to go to court w/him. Dad refused saying it would make the judge & caseworker (me) mad & we'd stop his supervised visits (which he never showed up for 😒). He was very surprised at the next court hearing when I testified we'd have no problem with his "friend" coming to court with him! His attorney asked why I'd mentioned that fact. I advised that he'd sent me an email stating he was afraid we'd stop his visitation if his friend came to court to support him. He called me an f-ing liar & said he'd never sent me an email! Therefore we got to enter the string of emails he'd been sending into the court file! The judge was definitely unhappy about the lies he'd been telling about court & persons involved. Also his not taking any responsibility for ANYTHING! I never got another email! 😅 Sadly, his children never re-established a relationship with him and their mother passed away a few years back. But they are all living successfully on their own now - the oldest girl is now a surgical nurse at a large children's hospital. Not bad for kids whose parents used to send them to the grocery store w/a shopping list, no money, and told them they'd have to sleep on the streets if they came home with no food. 😊
True fact: Some of the most dangerous, destructive, and difficult-to-treat forms of madness are so elaborately rationalized that they *seem* perfectly logical. People in the grip of these are generally nearly impossible to treat because they are convinced that all of this is obviously reasonable and the problem cannot possibly be with them. Well-educated people who go off the rails are particularly prone to this. Because what is higher education but training in presenting your beliefs (rational or not) in a rationally persuasive way?
I know this is old but that affect you're referring to, she's trying to sound as if she's upset and distraught over her children but what comes through is her rage at being challenged and defeated over and over. It's narcissistic rage. And she knows enough to know she needs to sound and look upset about the situation but her ego keeps her from being able to perform that act. Her entitlement, the idea that what she says isn't being automatically believed, is just boiling inside her. I bet she screams and throws something when the camera is off but then immediately becomes very stilted and not calm but bottled, and starts to plot on her next move.
My daughter is schizophrenic and she behaves exactly the same way as Sarah, she is also a licensed lawyer. Everyone is wrong, everyone is out to get her, refuses to accept facts, and the police was horrible monsters. My husband equates her to a functioning alcoholic, she can function very well in her crazy, makes compelling arguments (not based on fact) and is a master manipulator. Not a doctor, but I think this woman is schizophrenic, it was like listening to my daughter.
My daughter is in law school is the same as you described your daughter, and when I finally addressed her behaviour during one argument over how she stated I should care for my Mum ( I am a qualified nursing assistant over 20 years experience) My daughter thought she had the right to come down give a list and instructions on how I should do it, when I politely tried to remind her what I do for a living she blew up at me I was evil and emotionally blackmailing her so on and so forth since than she refuses to talk to either myself and two weeks after that she know refuses to talk to her Nan and she dropped her bf 😢
very sad and very difficult to deal with my sympathy, i also known others like this...our current society is also perpetrating this...gaslighting and mental illness they have learned to wear people down
She wasn't satisfied with only showing the ex husband, friends, people in their entourage how dissociated she was from sanity, so she decided to go live in front of the whole world.
As an adult, being polite is important for sociability. Being polite in court, however, is probably the MOST important place & time to be polite. Interrupting ANY person in court is guaranteed to bend you over the barrel.
Just ran across this. I’m not a lawyer but have served as an expert witness for over 20 years. I am impressed with the tremendous restraint shown by both judges.
One cannot represent themselves do you know what RE means? To REpresent your self means to PRESENT AGAIN, your misunderstood she is presenting herself. Watch the language and wording you use and respond to it has very different meanings then you think it does and being uneducated is what gets people to consent voluntarily
@@sierraarmstrong4111 Wow, it's hilarious that the sovcits actually come to this channel. Are you aware that your pseudolinguistics don't actually make sense? Language doesn't actually work like that.
This woman is absolutely insufferable. She’s one of those people who researched just enough that she can make everyone miserable with her ridiculous filings, but she still doesn’t know what she’s doing. Also, Why does the judge keep letting her interrupt?? She needs to be held in contempt for interrupting so much, she’s doing it on purpose. I feel bad for anyone she comes into contact with. What a nightmare of a human being.
Aah, the old 'thinks she's intelligent but doesn't have real legal knowledge, and isn't actually particularly bright, so she can't tell how stupid her motions and statements are' chestnut. On the bright side, when you get someone like that, they always end up just digging themselves into stupid holes because their thought process isn't thought out. They manage to figure out a reason to object to something but hasn't thought through the entire process, and thus doesn't know where to go with it or how they can even benefit herself by making her motions and objections. No good lawyer is going to go bringing up petty rules of court to argue as its unnessesary. They already know that they have done it within the letter of the law. This woman just doesn't understand nuance and that just because it's not exactly the way she reads the one interpretation of a particular law, doesn't mean that it's been done incorrectly.
Yeah! I mean, people who are facing civil charges and can't afford a lawyer are just supposed to lay down and take it! Plebs like her need to realize that they don't matter! If you can't afford a lawyer in a civil case, why would you think you are smart enough to spend hours studying so to try to defend yourself! Poor people are so dumb! The comments on this video are disgusting
They should have put her on mute the moment she started interrupting everyone. I've seen other judges do it, and it's frankly the only way anything got done with people like her who can't even wait to hear an entire sentence before objecting. (also the fact she objects before they can complete a sentence is very telling about her motives and innocence; if you can prove you're innocent why would it matter if they finish speaking? she's not aiming to refute them but silence them, probably the same way she kept her husband oppressed in the household.. shouting over him and telling him he's wrong and has no place to say what he does) You can tell she has no respect for the court system and just wants to see how she can use it to demand respect for *herself.*
Yes, BUT, she never brings to the court proof of these allegations just HERsay nonsense; she really doesn’t need to reproduce ever again, it’s just too dangerous for the children and the fathers of the children.
Same! I was up til 2 last night watching one from this channel with Lawyers Melanie Lawson and Tricia Solomon. If you havent watched that one definitely go watch it! Attorney Lawson had no clue what she was doin
The crazy lady’s disrespect for the court by constantly interrupting whoever is talking. She should be charged every time she does it. She’s doing it purposely.
This hits too close to home because my niece was stolen by her bio mom who then ran away to Texas. We didn't know where she was for 5 months and were only able to get her back with help from the sheriff. So get wrecked, Karen.
Ex hubby also in Texas also kidnapped our kids. It was a court ordered visitation across state lines, I didn't go because it was determined my presence may put them at risk so my Mom took them. Didn't matter, when my daughter about 4 or 5 , said basically mom had moved on and had boyfriend (we had been separated for over a year and the only reason the divorce hadn't happened is because of his stalling) he went ballistic beat my mother and his mother up and took the kids. I had kind of prepared for that possibility and had spent the weeks prior talking the the FBI in Texas. Long story short I got my kids back. His mom and my Mom had bruises but were fine.
I’m loving this second judge. He’s got the strong accent some Oklahomans have and as soon as she wants to start stating law he gets out his book. Plus the nerve of her accusing the NEW judge of a cover up is insane!
All the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and LEOs work for the same corporation. They have their own legalese language that is not the same English definitions as we use. They are all in it together,so she is correct to say the new judge is in on it.
@@headcleaver2003 exactly. Can't believe a lot of the people here who don't realise that while this girl is a pain in the arse, the court system as a whole is corrupt as all hell and commit fraud every day in life.
@@headcleaver2003 I mean you can look up legal definitions, plus it's the same thing in the STEM fields. They have to be precise even in their language. But no she is not correct, she is attempting to discredit the court for not agreeing with her. It seems to me that she has some type b cluster personality disorders. Also I don't know if you know but the gov is a tool made up of 3 different corps that technically work together but it's because each one of them has some degree of power over the others.
Totally agree with your summation. Even if she couldn't pay them, hitting her with the attorney's fees would've made a statement about how unacceptable her behavior was. She wouldn't be able to acknowledge that rebuke, but it at least maintains a standard. And accusing a judge of treason and child trafficking merited being jailed for contempt. Regarding her strange, emotionless affect, my guess is that she's so narcissistic that the only thing she cares about is avenging the insult to her pride resulting from having her children taken from her. There's no room for anything else. On the other hand, she might be taking some form of medication that just flattens her emotions out.
I'm thinking Mr Leyva is just SO happy not to have to live with this woman anymore! Edit: how the hell was that last outburst not contempt of court?? "You are all committing felonies right now, have a nice day trafficking children?" WTF.
I thought my ex-wife was nuts. Can you imagine what her kids would be like if she had sole legal and physical custody? They would be killing animals, wetting the beds, and starting fires.
exactly why I didn't engage with my exam luckily he only wanted 'things' not our children- I let him have everything and kept my children, finances everything myself He then dropped out of their lives until he had a stroke 3 yrs ago and expected them both to help him!
![ทุกครั้งที่หลับตา (Lucid Dream) - AYLA's [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4i1OBAQyv58/mqdefault.jpg)
I love it when one ex-spouse doesn’t even need to say anything and they just let the other talk and dig themselves a deeper hole. It’s so satisfying
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte and Nick Leyva
If a litigant wants to hang themselves why deny them the rope?
@@rkgaustino😊😅 bitch❤ Humphrey aàæ
IT appears she has plenty of rope...but she wants to tie the knot ....
He seems like a good guy just because he’s not reveling in her self-destruction, like I ABSOLUTELY would have been.
If I was him, I would be stifling laughter. But he just seems uncomfortable the whole time, and he doesn’t have any interest in destroying her as a person. He’s there for the right reasons, for the kids.
Sarah Leyva Pike was arrested in Maine and extradited to Amelia County, VA on charges of solicitation of the murders of circuit court Judge Joseph M. Teefey Jr., his wife, attorney Brooke Teefey, and Amelia Sheriff Ricky Walker, making a threat in writing, and another threat to bomb or burn a public building. In Nov 2023 she requested a jury trial. At that hearing, the case was continued to Jan 25 and 26 for the trial. --> And that is how she is doing right now. Father has the children; they are safe, happy, and loved. She has no contact.
Holy crap
and there are posters all over the news articles proclaiming her innocence and that the charges are “retaliation “. She obviously has a group of other crazies behind her.
She also has her own youtube channel and it is wild.
@@jdaniel3068I’d look but I’m scared
New update;
An Amelia County woman has pled guilty to two felony threat charges after months of threatening Facebook posts, emails and phone calls made towards the Amelia County Sheriff’s Office, an Amelia judge and others.
Levya was sentenced to five years on both felony convictions, with all but six months suspended.
That smile just proves she enjoys this so much. She loves being on stage. It’s not about her children.
I have to sit in on trials here sometimes (I'm not a lawyer). Have you noticed that court is more theater now-a-days than, well.. Court?
this kind of laugh is a reaction that I have as well sometimes when I get bad news or a string of bad luck. it is not enjoyment and more of a feeling like "of course it had to be like that, it couldn't have worked out just once" hard to describe properly.
Unfortunately, this mother will likely try to create chaos wherever she goes. She doesn’t realize that she is ultimately just hurting herself while pushing others away. I’m glad that the father has full custody of the children.
I know. Ultimately, the joke is really on herself
Her extreme narcissism is what’s driving her. She absolutely thrives on the attention, regardless of who’s giving it to her. A group of sadistic killers could be giving her attention and she’d still preen and peacock to get their focus.
The fact that she's been charged with solicitation for murder against a judge and their family is just wild. This woman is more dangerous than I could have imagined
She pled to felony threats and got 5 years , serving 6 months and 4 and half suspended. She still has a case open in TX too, for the same thing... She'll have to behave now that she's on paper
Honestly, based on her behavior, it makes sense.
She’s bonkers. Her TH-cam page shows she’s been at this for a LONG time too 😬
What's even more dangerous is that there are people out there that have bought into her lies and deceptions. She has a whole group of supporters that are harassing her ex, his family, the attorneys, the case workers, the court legal staff, etc. She truly believes that she has been wronged and that everyone involved in this case (other than her) has colluded to "kidnap" her children and "traffic" them for immoral/illegal purposes. It's downright frightening to think that she walks among us and that there are others like her!
The fact that she interrupts almost every single time someone else is speaking is evidence that she cannot control herself .
👍
I disagree… her interruptions are strategically placed to destroy the flow of her opponent. So far.. she’s been pretty successful at delaying cases while costing a ton of money….
Everytime they are trying to bs something she stops them as she should
@@robynhickman5083 Nah, actually she needs to just shut the hell up.
In the first hearing, she consistently interrupted everyone else and yet when one of the attorneys interrupted HER when she was speaking she snaps back with “do not interrupt me when I’m speaking!” Something along those lines.
She very clearly demonstrates that she expects to be treated above everyone else and is superior.
It speaks volumes to her overall character.
The fact she is a fatty is also proof she cannot control herself and tattoos show she has poor impulse control.
The amount of privilege they're giving her with interrupting this court proceeding is outrageous.
Yeah, I don’t understand. There’s a mute button.
I was in court a while ago (#NotyourLawyer) and another attorney had a hearing where a pro se respondent was just digging their hole deeper and deeper. But because I was in open court, I had to keep a poker face and literally bit my lip to keep a straight face. All I could think was “This person got their law degree from Google” and the respondent had nearly been thrown out of the court room by the judge
Seriously. They gave her way too much freedom to stall the process with the madness.
I don't get it with the first judge Wells, she is not a very effective rule follower. Interrupting should be unacceptable PERIOD.
Can the judge issue a gag order on nut job?
I absolutely love how the father just sat there quietly and let his attorney do all the talking and his ex show how crazy she is.
That's what I always did. You keep quiet.
He was the court reporter, not the husband
The court reporter was not on screen. That was the ex husband. You can hear her being called by the same last name as him.
Poor guy to be in this situation.
@Katherine Shade It is not the court reporter on the top right. It is her ex husband Mr Leyva, which was her last name.
Holy crap… Cases like these just make me scared of all the things that can happen if you have kids with the wrong person.
Yes!!! As it should…. !! It’s mind-blowing that these representatives don’t show up on the first date. 😢
Check the entire family before saying , I do
I just love it when people start talking over the judge and begin their statement with "With all due respect your Honor" when "due respect" is the last thing on their mind.
"With all due respect, your Honor" was one of Darrell Brooks' favorite sayings, close behind "Objection" and "Grounds?" and I cannot imagine anyone showing LESS respect for the judge than he did.
If she put half the effort into being a good mother as she did filing false claims, accusations and taking up the courts time she probably wouldn't be in this mess 🤣🤣
😏😏 well said
She's a real narcissist. They never do what's right, they only do what ever makes them look better.
I think they just go down a conspiratorial rabbit hole and can’t climb out. They find an echo chamber of scorned people who cheer on each other with zero critical thought and just make it so much worse for themselves.
Was just about to write the same thing. Get help lady! Put that energy into getting counciling, be a good person/mom, get off drugs, etc...She is a Complete NARCISSIST who thrives off VICTIMHOOD with extreme paranoid delusions. Jesus I though my babies mom was insane.
Right! She should put that effort into being an attorney since she did all this work to prep.
Every day her kids are separated from her is a gift to them. Can you imagine having to live with this woman?
It was certainly the case in McDonald vs McDonald out of Nevada. The father ended up serving prison time because of acts committed surrounding the divorce of his wife. Every day his children were away from their father was an absolute blessing to them.
She probably has them transitioning as we speak
I don’t know how it’s so easy to judge when we really don’t know I don’t think anyone should be without there children that long some supervision over visits something
@@patheticcircus3774 Her choice is to wast time playing stupid games in court and making unfounded accusations. She has chosen to be in a position where she cannot see her children. She played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
Clearly, many people in these comments have had little experience with "Childrens' Services" storming in (usually late at night) with the scantiest of evidence (if any) and ripping children -- crying and screaming in terror -- from their parents' arms. The entire system, with the intent of erring on the side of keeping children safe, judges the accused as guilty and requires them to then somehow prove their innocence against the tide that already has judged them guilty. Even Mike made the idiotic comment, "Oh yeah, then why don't you have custody of your kids?" as if that somehow proved guilt. These so-called childrens' "services" cause horrific trauma to the children and are never accountable for what they do. Anyone who pretends to know what is true here is just foolish. You don't. And anyone who pretends to know that the children are better off torn from their lives and their home to be thrown into the spin cycle of State custody is just ignorant. And if you are with the TRULY STUPID who believe that these self-righteous prejudging child kidnappers are never wrong, then disregard anything I have written because it won't reach a reasoning brain cell anyway.
I don't think she's a sovereign, but someone who watched too many movies and wants to play "Erin Brokovich" 😀
Nailed it.
Out of nowhere, she just starts giving off the monologues from my cousin Vinny and legally blonde 😂😂😂😂
Lmao that's such spot on read.
Don't think Erin Brokovich tried to take hits out on the judge.
That would definitely have made a more interesting movie.
Her statements “your Honor, you know what’s going on here and Ms Borum knows what is going on here” is such infuriating gaslighting. What a manipulative, miserable person
And she wants everyone else to join her misery.
yep while she did the evil hands clasping 😅
Exactly
What she doesn't know is that they do, indeed, know what's going on here. XD
@@enasniec-neicsnoc9591 That's what I kept thinking each time she stated this.
Can you imagine having her as your mother? If those kids haven’t seen her in a year, it is now in their best interest to keep it that way until they are 18. She is unbelievable.
@@michellefucoff4631 She is batshit fucking crazy. Do I think she should not procreate? Do I think they will take her kids. No. Can you imagine being her kids teachers? Parent teachers conference she comes in and starts accusing people of sex trafficking? Yeesh.
I think it's awful... That's their mother you show me a perfect human being in a perfect mother. I mean what's the standard for a mother to have her children?
We all are just human and quirky
@@maryr6237 she is a psychotic conspiracy theorist, no better than the QAnon pizzagate crowd. She shouldn’t be anywhere near children.
@Mary R *Mother is unintelligent and irresponsible, all in all not fit to parent*
Mary: "bUt iT's YoUr MoM hUrr DuRR"
@@Brionplein301 100% agree!!
It's so aggravating when you find yourself in the presence of someone that cuts everyone else off and then spews like a sphincter set on blast.
Can you imagine a court reporter trying to record that?
@@espgranny
That would be awful.
💀...'like a sphincter set on blast'...this is an awesome statement that I will treasure ❣
@@weadiamedia9331
My brother and I used to use such phrases, usually when describing a bad meal. Another common one was "coming down with a case of colon blow."
It doesn't seem right that so much time can be wasted pandering to a narcissist, causing other people to have to come back another day.
A remarkable demonstration of the famous "idiot for a client" rule.
Let’s all say a prayer for the significant other and children in this ridiculous woman’s life.
I was thinking the same!
Hopefully she won’t be successful at completely screwing them up!! Some ppl are not equipped to be parents.
A pray and body guards.
If I were the Significant Other, I'd grab the kids and RUN!!! She's going to do the same thing to him as she did to her ex - drive him insane!!!
I wish the judge would be harsher with her when she interrupts because she’s not got any consequences except for the judge telling her to let the prosecutor talk. That’s not enough
Hard with zoom.
Absolutely, contempt charges
YESSS... this is why judge judy is like she is. You need to stop some people or they'll never shut up
The judge can charge her with contempt and arrange to have her picked up to go to jail. Or at least fine the shit out of her every time she interrupted
There is a way to interrupt the Judge without sounding rude, obnoxious, etc. But, you have to use it judiciously (pun intended). For example, when I need to interrupt the Judge to get my point across or to clarify a point, I say, "Excuse me, Your Honor, I apologize for interrupting, but/however I need to clarify/state/remind/add . . . ". Ms. Leyva Pike never seemed to have learned good graces or decorum during any of her dozens of court appearances. You cannot buy class or good sense!
The irony is that every single one of her Judges are actually TOO kind and lenient (to a fault) is the most bizarre part of these sham recusals.
Letting these people rattle on is so dangerous for a society.
It's easier to let them ramble than it is to show them why they are wrong. So very, very, VERY wrong.
I'm a law school graduate but couldn't hurdle the BAR exam, I randomly came across your videos after not caring much about law for well over a decade. Somehow several of your videos have peaked my interest so much haha.
I hate being that person, but the word is "Piqued". It piqued your interest.
@@saintlynnie4037 your comment peaked my interest. I'll be looking into this.
@@fiscolorado656 I must say, your response piqued my interest, putting my interest now at its peak!
She is so manipulative. That whole, "We all know," spiel is straight out of the narcissists playbook. And that fake cry at the end is absolutely hilarious.
Miss Angela, you are very insightful. I’ve never given much thought to how narcissists work, but thinking back to the actions of the “King of Narcissists” (my ex-husband), I realize that you’ve hit the nail on the head.
@@ima-goodgirl Hugs, that must have been very difficult.
She’s using the fact that they’re Republicans to run a campaign against them on tiktok. She files affidavits against them then uses her own filings as evidence 😂
So True. It was annoying to listen to this manipulator and Darrell Brooks say “we all know” followed by a litany of false info and lies.
@@nursedro2373Darrell brooks drove me crazy, her and this one are so out there
As someone whose job it is to work with trafficking survivors, it makes me so angry when people throw the word "trafficking" around as a buzzword to make things sound salacious. That said, this lady is beyond the pale. I cannot believe she doxxed people in legal documents. SMH
I am actually surprised that it is allowed, or that at the very least such information is automatically redacted.
Thank you for that comment! Every time I hear people using the word I think of REAL trafficking and how clueless they are.
To consider one's children living with their saner parent to be trafficking shows her brain cells are not at a functioning level.
*The public seems not to understand that EVERY court filing essentially "doxxes" everyone associated with the case, from the litigants to the attorneys, to the witnesses, with very few [almost exclusively statutory] exceptions. The case file will, out of necessity, have the addresses of every person touched by the filings within the file. Service requires an address. Any Joe Sixpack can look at the full contents of almost any file, now on-line in most courts.*
I bet that is upsetting; it enrages me and I’m just a bystander!! She should be charged as a vexatious litigant.
When I saw her smiling reaction to the judge’s ruling it gave me a sense that she may love the fight for her children more than having them. The “Cause” gives her purpose and meaning which is reinforced by the approval of her friends, accolades from activists who use her and notoriety on social media. Toss in animus toward her husband and any judge or attorney that dares to defy her it is a pretty heady cocktail. Dopamine on the rocks with an adrenaline chaser.
It’s the typical rebel-without-a-cause mentality. They’re angry about something, what that something is no one is quite sure.
It's the total narcissistic mentality
She needs a continuous IV drip of Thorazine to shut her up for the next 96 hours. Start it on a Tuesday after a holiday Monday, then everyone can recharge their minds and bodies. Get away from this toxic waste of flesh for at least a week & and a half.She's worst than a record whose needle keeps skipping and repeats, skips and repeats, skips and repeats.
You are spot on.
😂❤😅
This woman doing all this and she don't even have her kids????? 😅😅😂😂😂
She's the type of person who is used to getting her way by talking over people and trying to intimidate them into silence. She doesn't realize that only works at the grocery store or with friends and family. But court is DESIGNED to disallow that to happen.
She thinks she's going to control her entire case. Her husband has obviously had a lot of practice being silent prior to the divorce and most likely had to relearn speech. I call people like her bullies, I'm sure she started on the playground
Can you imagine what it's like to be married to her? Beyond that, who in their right mind would have married her in the first place?
@@seanparker4461 disasters, misfortunes & tragedy tend to strike in most unexpected ways.
@@Arianne3011 I guess she could have masked who she really was.
@@seanparker4461I'd rather not. I don't wanna know what hell is like of I can help it.
Imagine what kind of argument her kids have had to go through every time they ask for a drink or an ice cream.
My God it's like scratching on a chalkboard 😅😅😅
Well not for the year prior to this court date at least. Must have been like a vacation for the poor kids
I object, you getting ice cream or a drink is harmful to your life and mine.
She requires clarification
@virginiaordaya that's messed up.
If she would put the same energy in to improving her parental skill as she does into getting even with her X she would be mother of the year.
or ... a job? Should get a job and maybe pay child support.
Yeah, she’s got all the time in the world to file all these motions and affidavits but she doesn’t have a job I mean come on. Probably living off the state getting food stamps. Certainly not doing what she needs to do to get her kids back.
I couldn’t agree more with these comments. Getting a job or two jobs plus mental health support & parental classes will definitely improve her chances of potentially seeing her kids back in the future.
Amen!
I love it when this judge said he is denying the motion to recuse the "honorable Judge Wells"
Her kids are lucky that they've had a year free of her poisoning.
I hope they have MANY more years away from her.
@@livinlovelee2683oh they will for sure. She was recently arrested for solicitation of murder and threatening to blow up some buildings.
@BradEp3K20 Nice, how long did she get cause at this point I'm assuming she is being held without bond
Dude, this is the best, I love Pro Se litigants when they think they are smarter than the attorney who went to school and practiced for years.
Some are smarter. What they are lacking is knowing the court system (not to be confused with knowing the law) and knowing whose ass to kiss and how deeply. If you listen to this Law Talk Mike 90 percent of his complaints are she's not getting her nose brown enough. SHE'S TRYING TO RECUSE A JUDGE!!!!!! Butmunching the Judge will do absolutely no good, so she should come out guns blazing.
To get into law school you need to have a top 10% IQ. You don't get that on Google.
Exactly!!!!
Catherine Borum is nothing short of a role model for attorneys. How she handled all of this was beautiful.
I sincerely felt her pain when she was talking about being fearful for the safety of her seven year old child. And I do not even have a child. This woman is scary enough on her own, much less having to worry about her "inspiring" any unstable third party that might read her wild accusations......
Notice how no one interrupts Blondie when she talks. But she can't let anyone else speak without her butting in "Objection, Your Honor: Nuh uh".
I don’t see why judges don’t take advantage of the online hearings and mute people when they keep talking out of turn.😂
They do sometimes.
I think a lot of judges try not to mute participants unless they feel there's no other choice. And not out of a sense of masochism but so that later on the person doesn't have room to appeal. And to ensure that the parties are being treated equally no matter how dumb they are. Reason one thousand why I'm not a judge is that I probably would mute people way too soon then have the higher ups in the judicial branch would grumble I was too reliant on it.
Oh they do!
Because they dont want to actually deny people the right to defend themselves. Plus people who represent themselves tend to get a lot more leeway than lawyers. While at times i think miting is justified it would defeat the purpose of creating a record.
I seen when judges have muted, especially Judge Manning!
With people like her, there is no wonder our courts are so backed up. Talk about filing every baseless motion!
Right or wrong she has a right to be heard
@@aprilmariefears1381 True. Thats the system. He, She, whatever.
Her seeking judge after judge after judge looking for her desired outcome is tantamount to asking her way up the manager chain.
Very true
Exactly 💯. It's infuriating and abuse of the court system.
She would ask God to recuse Himself if she went through everyone else.
@@imdfox1774 And she STILL wouldn’t be satisfied!
SHE WANTS GOD’S MANAGER
She's got this idea that she's going to find a judge that will feel sorry for her!! Like a mother with Munchausen by Proxy, she's looking for a doctor to find something wrong with her child rather than a Dr that tells her that he kid is fine!😊
I feel like I am watching a high school debate team member show up in court to defend themselves. And fail miserably.
Oh this is a dumpster fire. You're told in law school, even if you specialize in family law to never represent yourself. Always get a lawyer. This is just depressing. Why people feel like self representation is better is mind blowing.
I'm guessing her ex husband saw this a million times to be able to sit so quietly without laughing.
I have no problem believing this woman violated the terms of her custody agreement based on her behavior towards a judge and during court proceedings. She reeks of "I does what I wants!!"
@Just Me She supposedly lives in Virginia
Also on the "my children" as though she had no help in producing said children. Using children as weapons is ........
Also, I don't feel bad, one little bit that she hasn't spoken to her kids in all that while.. however, I do feel bad for the kids that haven't spoken to their mother in all that while.. equation: mother + without own kids = tells you everything you need to know about her. No extra details required
Shes in for a shock
Who has Crazy Glue on hand??
From the outside looking in….what I’m not sure she realizes is that accusing everyone around her of not understanding or being wrong only makes her look worse. 😬
You mean craaaaszzyyy!
@@piva1358 haha, I was shooting for subtly. But yes. Hahaha
she is appealing to the radical Q people. They are giving her money to this day through go fund me
She knows her constipational rights.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The fact that this person can disrspect the court and not go to jail shows they have no control...LOL
A child custody agreement is never "irrevocable" as the circumstances can change at any time which could require a change at any time in the best interest of the children which is clearly evident since she has had no contact with the children for a year
Exactly...
Not necessarily true.
Exactly. That is very true.
Not true.
I can advise. If you like.
You’d think it would be. But no.
Wouldn't it be fun to watch HER and Darrel Brooks have a debate!? 😵
They will kill each other 😅😅
I’m in for that, can’t wait😂😂😂😂
I love the look on the judges face when she says "you know exactly what's happening." When she says "trafficking children" she means taking them away from her. She really has no idea what chid trafficking actually is.
This girl is definitely not the brightest light on the Christmas Tree!! Does she know what sex trafficking implies or even what it is?? When your children are taken away from you because custody is granted to the father, that is NOT SEX TRAFFICKING!! She's just ridiculous, and I pray to God that she loses custody PERMANENTLY!!
This lady is spending waaaaayyy too much time Googling legal terms that don't apply to this case!! She's a freaking bulldozer trying to flatten anything and anyone in her way!!
WAIT! WAIT! WAIT! SHE'S not comfortable with HER address being public?!!!
Ikr irony at it's finest
When a judge lets you keep talking, they have most likely made up their mind and are just letting you prove you are plain WRONG! love watching professionals stay focused when against someone who thinks they can just annoy and talk their way into being right.
So right! These people are exhausting to watch, but it’s a strategy. Never confuse the court with Facebook..
Idk I'm kind of convinced the judge has been shoe shopping the entire time 😅
@@virginiabeech lol, perfect!!
@@virginiabeech 😂😂😂😂😂
This broad is absolutely terrifying. She comes off as vengeful. It seems as though she will say and do anything about others to harm them in pursuit of her vengence. Nicolas, how did you find this gem? My sympathies. I pray for you, sir.
Nicholas is a Simp. He suffers from simperism.
How did she have kids with her constant interrupting? It would have been difficult to complete the process of getting pregnant with her constantly saying “ wait, wait!” 🤣🤣🤣
She says that she "means no harm to the judge or the other attorney!" Yeah, then WHY DID YOU TRY TO MAKE THIS INFORMATION PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE?? She's just desperate to get this to go in her favor!! She needs to be arrested for that alone. She definitely meant to cause harm to the judge, the attorney, and anyone else that might get in her way!!
Seriously. The fact that she’s so insistent on keeping this from being sealed is insane and telling. It wouldn’t affect the case, she’s just trying to ruin his life.
She's been charged with soliciting murder against the judge and the judge's family.
“I object to anyone saying anything before the court that I do not like!!”
That was a good speech but you still are not getting your kids back...😂
😂
Those kids’ teachers are rejoicing that she no longer attends parent teacher conferences.😂
She, as a non custodial parent takes the kids to another state. Then claims corruption when TX child services goes all the way to her new location, takes her kid(s) back to TX.
yeah that's weird. And it takes awhile to get the government to take such corrective action. I would guess she had the kids in VA for a bit.
I feel bad for Nicolas Leyva. I can’t even imagine all the manipulation and gaslighting he’s been through with this loon.
Not sorry, he chose her to mother his kid(s)
@@nkolika271 Who knows when the crazy kicked in though. People change over time. He split with her so he doesn't seem to be into her nonsense either.
Hopefully he stays single
That's why they need to watch where they're dipping they're wicks 🤭😆
Just goes to show, be aware of who you decide to have children with. Don't rush into it. Otherwise you'll have someone like this awful woman to deal with for the next 18+ years.
This woman's fake cry behind a HUGE smile (s) and laughing!!! OMG
The fact that Ms. Leyva wholeheartedly believes she's an effective representative for herself is unsettling.
She is pretty articulate though. If she can stop interrupting she should go to law school.
@@TORTOISESFORDAYSgiven her more recent troubles, I don’t think that a successful career in law is in her future. She is very articulate, though and I could see some squandered potential in the midst of her batshittery.
@@TheGillionaire maybe she can turn it around who knows. At the present time I agree I'm not sure the bar would be happy to admit her lol
As a 25 year trial attorney, I certainly miss the formality of in person courtroom litigation.
Are you a lawyer LL Y
Sounds like it😂
@@gabrielalizarragacruz9158 yes ma’am. I’ve been an attorney for 25 years. I’m retired now and only do a small amount of consulting. Have a great day and take care. Xo
LL Y do you do family law too
@@lly8598 Apparently she didn't read "retired" 🤣
For what it’s worth - from Reddit:
“Hi. I am a TH-camr who did a deep dive on Sarah's case for the purposes of supporting her I contacted her via email for a copy of the evidence folder she advertises on her TikTok and she provided it to me.
Her story was extremely compelling however once I reviewed the documentation I dropped the entire project as I could not frame this in any way that would make her look good without lying about what I found. The Texas family court has a pretty bad reputation when it comes to seperating children from thier parents. A lot of these stories are absolutely heartbreaking. This is not one of those cases.
The hardest part of sorting all of this out was figuring out how the things Sarah was saying during the hearings related to what was actually going on. She has a tendancy to skip steps in her thought processes which makes it difficult for 3rd parties to follow along. There is what she is saying, and there is what she means and the two do not always align unless you've studied the timeline, the court videos, as well as her social media posts. I will do my best to elaborate.
For example, one of her videos is a hearing is to force the recusal of the judge overseeing her case however during the video she does not provide any legal justification for the recusal of Judge Wells. She instead attempts to retry her child custody issue starting from the arbitration agreement. That is not the purpose of this hearing but she believes that going higher up will get her the results she wants, but it wont.
She keeps refering to the "irrevocable mediated settlement" that she claims gave her the right to take the children out of state. Sarah has provided this to me directly upon request via email and she is incorrect. Everything that followed stems from that primary fundamental misunderstanding.
Had she clearly states her intentions the arbitrator would have advised that they cannot grant it as a matter of law.
She believes a personally requested addendum written in vague language that she requested be added to the arbitration agreement supercedes Texas state law, which it doesn't. No child custody arbitration agreement allows one parent to take a child out of state without the other's knowledge or permission. She is wrong about this and refuses to move forward on anything else until a court agrees to this which will never happen.
What she refers to as "perjury" from child services is thier "unwillingness to admit that she outsmarted the texas family court system" by adhering to state law instead of the vague language addendum she requested.
She has also conducted herself in a mannor which a reasonable person can only presume to be bad faith. In addition to constantly interrupting the proceedings and threatening to have her ex husband shot when he drove to virgina to see the boys, she attempts to include family court employees home addresses in her filings despite having zero relevance to the case. Whether this was done for the purposes of harassment or not, it would facilitate the harassment of family court employees. She has shared the courtroom zoom link with another activist in her circle, who was completely unrelated to the case, so he could actively disrupt the proceedings. I also suspect that she was involved in a DDoS attack on her ex husbands lawyer's office in another effort to disrupt and deprive him of his lawful representation during a hearing beefore a judge.
There are steps she can take to regain access to her children. She simply refuses to engage with those steps or take any action to get them back through the system which is why her original attorney quit. I have a copy of those texts as well provided to me by Sarah herself. She now believs that her former lawyer is also a part of the conspiracy against her.
I have reviewed every document and I can only reasonably conceive of two possible scenarios:
Scenario 1 - Sara Pike is extremely intelligent and dangerous person who has found a way hack the court system to harass her ex husband, as well as the court staff who have rightfully sided with state law, while falsely interjecting herself into an activist circle with legitimate grievances in order to garner personal attention and build a career as an activist.
Scenario 2 - She is mentally ill and is being enabled by strangers online.”
I think both your scenarios are correct
You know, I find most cases with insane, intractable defendants like these typically have a critical stage at the proceedings where the defendant seriously misunderstood something critical (which they refuse to consider as a possibility), and everything else flows from there.
Door no. 1, but she does have help/enablers !
Think it might be a mix of the two scenarios in my humble opinion 🤔
I clerked for a Family Law office in California, and it’s no different than Texas: it’s crazy the ease which they remove children for what seems no reason at all - then the parents are tied up in court for years to get them back. Definitely a system of law, nationwide, that needs a to be fixed.
So this Karen files a motion at every Judge who rules against her? She must REALLY get off on this. Sign of a complete sociopath. I see why she lost her children.
I don't think she is so much a sovereign citizen as she is an "amateur lawyer." She did some research, maybe consulted some online legal sources, and she has made what she feels is a cognizant and coherent argument. She also has an ulterior motive to prevent the case from being sealed. I think the motive is somewhere along the lines of vindictive public shaming of the father. She is attempting to set up a "gotcha" scenario but is doing so unsuccessfully. God Bless 🥰
In Arizona, you can hire a paralegal For seventy five dollars a visit To do all your paperwork and explain exactly how you need to present yourself in court So you can go pro se she probably did some form of that
It’s still sounds like she’s equipped her paper terrorism spell though
Very true. She only gets what she's after, through this public shaming.
"Your court your honor" ( she corrected herself) she is definitely sv
"Treason" 😂
The second judge and the attorney made me laugh when she went "you're commiting a felony right now, have fun trafficking children" and they just went "Ok, bye bye now" 😂
This judge does not have control over her court and it drives me crazy that she doesn't immediately shut Sarah down when she interrupts
Yes she didn’t stop her interrupting but however she is letting this women expose herself completely.
Not a single correction. Just let her keep going
That usually drives me nuts too, but now I've seen a few instances, like this one, where I feel like it's at least somewhat intentional. It's as if the judge has some idea what kind of person they're dealing with (based on the previous motions, court interactions and that they're representing themselves) and the judge realizes the futility of responding as they would with any normal person in their midst, and also wants to allow the person to show themselves on record. Either way it requires some serious patience to deal with people like that.
👏👏👏👏👏
She thinks she’s another Lauren Boebert. She is a whole joke. She is a whole joke.
Nicolas is absolutely loving this.. He doesn't have to do a thing to show how bad she is. This is probably the easiest day he's had through all this!
But he is still running up a legal bill
@@TorontoGeorge I think he'd be happy to pay to watch this sack of crap humiliate herself lol
Yes. I had to pay lawyer fees for at least 2 years extra because my ex-husband refused to comply with court orders, refused to hand in his documentation for discovery request while I immediately handed in mine. He also kept hiring and firing attorneys which delayed everything because each new one needed time to get to know the case. He lied repeatedly, even about things that we easily proved in court were straight out lies. He perjured himself many times. He never paid anything, he was penalized with fees that he just refused. It took me 2 years to save up to a lawyer's retainer so I could file for divorce, and during 5 years I have had to borrow and pay about $60,000.00 to pay my lawyer... My ex still refuses to pay... He has even left the country to avoid the court appointed back arrears and support.
I am happy to finally have the divorce finished and the judge was fair; I just hope that I will get something of what he owes me. I'm living on disability, so there's very little money coming in.
In spite of the judge's fairness, it has been devastating to see him get away with all his lawbreaking and procrastination in full view of the court... I wish that the judge would have put more pressure on him and his different lawyers. It would have saved me thousands of dollar.
@@lenasamzelius5530 "I'm living on disability"
There goes your credibility......
@@elonmust7470 what an absolute ridiculous comment.
How can she put EVERYONE else address out for the PUBLIC but yet she don’t feel comfortable or safe providing hers 🤦🏾♀️ 🤦🏾♀️ 🤦🏾♀️ the AUDACITY
Don't you realize she is the only person who matters?
If she is publicly accusing state officials of ignoring perjury and fraud up to the judges level then she is also implicating the local LEOs and CPS of harming her children. If she will not give out her address then she has already been harassed. 1 in 5 families have been targeted by CPS in Texas. They lose over 500 children per year in the system and can't find them. She is smiling because she more than likely has a federal lawsuit ongoing and she will add this judge to the list of conspirators to be investigated.
Public servants shouldn’t be findable by the public. That’s outrageous.
Right? She acts like she's not spreading false accusations! She's probably just mad that if the files are sealed then she can't use her 'child advocates' to harass people into giving her her way.
@@bluedragonfly8139 If someone is trying to steal her children then she has every right to confront the kidnappers, whether they work for the government or not.
I’m sure every judge she appears in front of has the same concern “Today is the day my clerk/stenographer walks out of the job”. What a headache of a human being 🤦🏽♀️
She lost her children.
@@noneofyourbusiness2750 Oh!
Oh? What kind of reply is that?@@jaykay1053
😂👌
@@noneofyourbusiness2750and for good reason apparently
If she spent the night in jail for contempt, at least the lawyer would be able to finally serve her! 😅
This just popped up today, watched the whole thing then looked her up. She was charged with soliciting murder (2 counts) among other things and extradited from Maine to Texas in November 2023. Today she plead guilty to some of the lesser charges in a plea deal. CRAZY!
This judge is giving Karen way too much leeway. Instead of shutting her down immediately, she lets her talk for quite awhile before telling her to wait her turn.
The judge is almost worthless. It took way to much time for her to shutdown the interruptions, and never got her stopped from butting in. The judge encouraged her to act this way.
Webcam court isn't as easy to handle. Definitely not for weak judges, like this one.
I agree, other judges would have put her in contemp a long time ago. This was painful to watch.
I see it different I see it as she isn't doing herself any favours and letting her rabble on shows that she will b1tch complain and file anything to dirty everyone's name to clean hers but just my opinion
Totally agree, after the first or maybe second interruption, the Judge should have smacked her down hard, but instead allows her to continue interjecting, interrupting and arguing. Wait your bleeping turn.
I feel the most sorry for her children. She lost them for a reason, not because every judge and attorney in the hunt has waged a personal vendetta against her. If you go through her social media she does appear half crazy and unstable.
My advice to her is to GROW UP AND STOP destroying your children, you don’t think you are having any negative affect on your children BUT YOU ARE. They will choose their father as they grow and stay away from you.
Stalker.
Well said!
Gulf baby...!!!
She could have lost custody just bc a judge got irritated and nothing to do with laws. Happens everyday. We see feelings interfere in any and all things that law is involved in.
@@lisatompkins6386 Social Media is public…?
As a retired prosecutor, I've had to deal with people representing themselves......thinking they are qualified after watching 4 episodes of Law and Order. One guy kept telling me that the testimony by the victim is not evidence. 🤦♂️so I told him verbatim thr definition of evidence and he still didn't believe me. So, I told him to ask for a public defender. He was reluctant. But I finally convinced him to let people who do this for a living do their job.
She seems more invested in fighting in court than actually getting her children back.
I bet she never spent this much time and energy actually being a mom when she had her children, otherwise she would have never had them taken from her. She’s more focused on identifying herself as a victim of the court system than identifying as a mother.
she wants the excuse " i did everything i could" and this helps justify her being a shit parent.
That woman should’ve been arrested for contempt of court, liable, slander, harassment, and suspicion of child endangerment. Put her in general population and accidentally let it slip that she’s here for crimes against a child or children. I doubt anymore would be heard about her, not a loss
She is in the process of suing her for liable, im sure. She wants to serve her for a reason.
She doesn’t feel safe giving her address but is fine doxing court officials and attorneys…smh…
💯
She thinks she’s the main character.
She’s in jail at this very moment for threatening a judge and his wife. I think everyone else in her orbit are the ones not safe, not the other way around
@@MidnightAndLuna and people are continuing to defend her, even though she pled guilty. People are WILD.
@@NoName-sd9qcthere will always be a portion of the population that is utterly incurably insane
I am retired from almost 25 years of working child protection. I had to change my home phone # numerous times & had special security for my family at least twice. But the best story was an alcoholic father that belonged to a pre-sovereign citizen group. He would email the group leader w/cc to the rest of the group before hearings & after hearings. BUT... Somehow he got my work email mixed up in his cc list! So I got a copy of every email he sent out! And he was telling them some magnificent whoppers about what was said in court, what he'd done to comply with orders, and how the foster family was trying to steal his children by lying to the court! He had 3 children & failed to mention that 2 of them were over 16 and in independent living group homes and apartments, not in foster care w/foster parents who wanted to steal them. 🙄 The 3rd pre-teen had transferred to supervised relative care with a maternal aunt where disabled mom & her little dog, too, were also living. There was a no contact order between Dad, the children & their caregivers because he'd been arrested many times for being violent when drunk - which was most of the time.
Finally even his group leader started questioning Dad's stories & offered to go to court w/him. Dad refused saying it would make the judge & caseworker (me) mad & we'd stop his supervised visits (which he never showed up for 😒). He was very surprised at the next court hearing when I testified we'd have no problem with his "friend" coming to court with him! His attorney asked why I'd mentioned that fact. I advised that he'd sent me an email stating he was afraid we'd stop his visitation if his friend came to court to support him. He called me an f-ing liar & said he'd never sent me an email! Therefore we got to enter the string of emails he'd been sending into the court file! The judge was definitely unhappy about the lies he'd been telling about court & persons involved. Also his not taking any responsibility for ANYTHING! I never got another email! 😅 Sadly, his children never re-established a relationship with him and their mother passed away a few years back. But they are all living successfully on their own now - the oldest girl is now a surgical nurse at a large children's hospital. Not bad for kids whose parents used to send them to the grocery store w/a shopping list, no money, and told them they'd have to sleep on the streets if they came home with no food. 😊
Catherine Borum's rebuttals are *chef's kiss*. She shuts this Karen down in every way and I love every second of it.
I am so annoyed that the first judge didn't even give a contempt warning for that chick constantly interrupting and talking over the other lady
The way she blends nutbag and reason is very very dangerous.
True fact: Some of the most dangerous, destructive, and difficult-to-treat forms of madness are so elaborately rationalized that they *seem* perfectly logical. People in the grip of these are generally nearly impossible to treat because they are convinced that all of this is obviously reasonable and the problem cannot possibly be with them.
Well-educated people who go off the rails are particularly prone to this. Because what is higher education but training in presenting your beliefs (rational or not) in a rationally persuasive way?
@@Tindometari I like it 😆
@@Tindometari well said
That is what's known as a sociopath...
I know this is old but that affect you're referring to, she's trying to sound as if she's upset and distraught over her children but what comes through is her rage at being challenged and defeated over and over. It's narcissistic rage. And she knows enough to know she needs to sound and look upset about the situation but her ego keeps her from being able to perform that act. Her entitlement, the idea that what she says isn't being automatically believed, is just boiling inside her. I bet she screams and throws something when the camera is off but then immediately becomes very stilted and not calm but bottled, and starts to plot on her next move.
My daughter is schizophrenic and she behaves exactly the same way as Sarah, she is also a licensed lawyer. Everyone is wrong, everyone is out to get her, refuses to accept facts, and the police was horrible monsters. My husband equates her to a functioning alcoholic, she can function very well in her crazy, makes compelling arguments (not based on fact) and is a master manipulator. Not a doctor, but I think this woman is schizophrenic, it was like listening to my daughter.
My daughter is in law school is the same as you described your daughter, and when I finally addressed her behaviour during one argument over how she stated I should care for my Mum ( I am a qualified nursing assistant over 20 years experience) My daughter thought she had the right to come down give a list and instructions on how I should do it, when I politely tried to remind her what I do for a living she blew up at me I was evil and emotionally blackmailing her so on and so forth since than she refuses to talk to either myself and two weeks after that she know refuses to talk to her Nan and she dropped her bf 😢
very sad and very difficult to deal with my sympathy, i also known others like this...our current society is also perpetrating this...gaslighting and mental illness they have learned to wear people down
I think I worked for her for 6 months. Seriously, I worked for a lawyer just like that. Ewww
My sister has schizophrenia and she acts like this in her most lucid days very argumentative and round in circles
@@chasethecat3839 trust me, 99.99% are just like that (or worse) to work for
She wasn't satisfied with only showing the ex husband, friends, people in their entourage how dissociated she was from sanity, so she decided to go live in front of the whole world.
As an adult, being polite is important for sociability. Being polite in court, however, is probably the MOST important place & time to be polite. Interrupting ANY person in court is guaranteed to bend you over the barrel.
I feel very frustrated when a Judge will allow a woman like this to drone on and on and attempts to take over the meeting.
Just ran across this. I’m not a lawyer but have served as an expert witness for over 20 years. I am impressed with the tremendous restraint shown by both judges.
Why do the judjes keep letting her get away with interrupting?
Incredulity
Incredulity, she can’t believe that she lost AGAIN
Have you seen this? th-cam.com/video/5bjDkQR57fA/w-d-xo.html It's animated, but it really happened. A voice actor read the transcript.
She’s a perfect example why it’s not wise to represent yourself in court. 😅
😂 she studied and researched expecting for her info to win. Problem is, his lawyer blew up her objections from years of practicing law 😂
One cannot represent themselves do you know what RE means? To REpresent your self means to PRESENT AGAIN, your misunderstood she is presenting herself. Watch the language and wording you use and respond to it has very different meanings then you think it does and being uneducated is what gets people to consent voluntarily
@@sierraarmstrong4111 Wow, it's hilarious that the sovcits actually come to this channel. Are you aware that your pseudolinguistics don't actually make sense? Language doesn't actually work like that.
…or to ever marry anyone.
She is a perfect example of why abortions should not be illegal
This lady is scary. She needs to be WATCHED, very carefully.
I agree
I fully expect her to one day take violent actions of one stripe or another. She has a lot of worrying signs about her.
“However, when I did a little research …”
A little research is a dangerous thing
She's the opposite of emotional, she's LOVING this, smirking and mugging for the camera.
She's incriminating herself right in front of the judge. She's digging herself in a bigger hole than she already is.
ooohhh shes done with digging alright, she is using semtex and therminte..
Right she will never get her kid’s, she think’s she is smarter then the judge’s, she will find out she is not.
This woman is absolutely insufferable. She’s one of those people who researched just enough that she can make everyone miserable with her ridiculous filings, but she still doesn’t know what she’s doing. Also, Why does the judge keep letting her interrupt?? She needs to be held in contempt for interrupting so much, she’s doing it on purpose. I feel bad for anyone she comes into contact with. What a nightmare of a human being.
Aah, the old 'thinks she's intelligent but doesn't have real legal knowledge, and isn't actually particularly bright, so she can't tell how stupid her motions and statements are' chestnut.
On the bright side, when you get someone like that, they always end up just digging themselves into stupid holes because their thought process isn't thought out. They manage to figure out a reason to object to something but hasn't thought through the entire process, and thus doesn't know where to go with it or how they can even benefit herself by making her motions and objections.
No good lawyer is going to go bringing up petty rules of court to argue as its unnessesary. They already know that they have done it within the letter of the law. This woman just doesn't understand nuance and that just because it's not exactly the way she reads the one interpretation of a particular law, doesn't mean that it's been done incorrectly.
Yeah! I mean, people who are facing civil charges and can't afford a lawyer are just supposed to lay down and take it! Plebs like her need to realize that they don't matter! If you can't afford a lawyer in a civil case, why would you think you are smart enough to spend hours studying so to try to defend yourself! Poor people are so dumb!
The comments on this video are disgusting
They should have put her on mute the moment she started interrupting everyone. I've seen other judges do it, and it's frankly the only way anything got done with people like her who can't even wait to hear an entire sentence before objecting. (also the fact she objects before they can complete a sentence is very telling about her motives and innocence; if you can prove you're innocent why would it matter if they finish speaking? she's not aiming to refute them but silence them, probably the same way she kept her husband oppressed in the household.. shouting over him and telling him he's wrong and has no place to say what he does) You can tell she has no respect for the court system and just wants to see how she can use it to demand respect for *herself.*
Did anyone keep track of how many lawyers, judges, and other people this woman slandered?
Yes, BUT, she never brings to the court proof of these allegations just HERsay nonsense; she really doesn’t need to reproduce ever again, it’s just too dangerous for the children and the fathers of the children.
I’m not even a lawyer and these videos are so intriguing to me. 😂😂
Same! I was up til 2 last night watching one from this channel with Lawyers Melanie Lawson and Tricia Solomon. If you havent watched that one definitely go watch it! Attorney Lawson had no clue what she was doin
The label should be called being a legalisphile or jurisphile.
Same here!!
The crazy lady’s disrespect for the court by constantly interrupting whoever is talking. She should be charged every time she does it. She’s doing it purposely.
Very true
She simply has a problem with anyone that doesn't agree with her. The charges she faces are serious and she needs to go away for a VERY long time!
This hits too close to home because my niece was stolen by her bio mom who then ran away to Texas. We didn't know where she was for 5 months and were only able to get her back with help from the sheriff.
So get wrecked, Karen.
I'm so sorry and glad your niece is safe.
@@Loud2013 Aww, thanks so much!
I’m glad you got your daughter back. If you kidnap your child you don’t deserve to have her. God bless you
Ex hubby also in Texas also kidnapped our kids. It was a court ordered visitation across state lines, I didn't go because it was determined my presence may put them at risk so my Mom took them. Didn't matter, when my daughter about 4 or 5 , said basically mom had moved on and had boyfriend (we had been separated for over a year and the only reason the divorce hadn't happened is because of his stalling) he went ballistic beat my mother and his mother up and took the kids. I had kind of prepared for that possibility and had spent the weeks prior talking the the FBI in Texas. Long story short I got my kids back. His mom and my Mom had bruises but were fine.
@@cindysue5902 Jesus! What a nightmare. I'm so sorry, and I hope he's in prison.
I’m loving this second judge. He’s got the strong accent some Oklahomans have and as soon as she wants to start stating law he gets out his book. Plus the nerve of her accusing the NEW judge of a cover up is insane!
All the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and LEOs work for the same corporation. They have their own legalese language that is not the same English definitions as we use. They are all in it together,so she is correct to say the new judge is in on it.
@@headcleaver2003 exactly. Can't believe a lot of the people here who don't realise that while this girl is a pain in the arse, the court system as a whole is corrupt as all hell and commit fraud every day in life.
@@headcleaver2003 I mean you can look up legal definitions, plus it's the same thing in the STEM fields. They have to be precise even in their language. But no she is not correct, she is attempting to discredit the court for not agreeing with her. It seems to me that she has some type b cluster personality disorders. Also I don't know if you know but the gov is a tool made up of 3 different corps that technically work together but it's because each one of them has some degree of power over the others.
Holy crap. She has this huge campaign online of accusations for Court corruption. I’m shocked none of these parties aren’t suing for defamation.
The Streisand effect is a scary thing.
Was waiting to see Darrell Brooks chime in the zoom and state, "Your honor,what about subject matter jurisdiction?"...LMFAO 😂😂
Totally agree with your summation. Even if she couldn't pay them, hitting her with the attorney's fees would've made a statement about how unacceptable her behavior was. She wouldn't be able to acknowledge that rebuke, but it at least maintains a standard. And accusing a judge of treason and child trafficking merited being jailed for contempt.
Regarding her strange, emotionless affect, my guess is that she's so narcissistic that the only thing she cares about is avenging the insult to her pride resulting from having her children taken from her. There's no room for anything else. On the other hand, she might be taking some form of medication that just flattens her emotions out.
She failed a drug test??? 😱 I never would have guessed! 🤦🏼♀️🤣
According to Leyva, the test was trafficking drugs 😂
I'm thinking Mr Leyva is just SO happy not to have to live with this woman anymore!
Edit: how the hell was that last outburst not contempt of court?? "You are all committing felonies right now, have a nice day trafficking children?" WTF.
I thought my ex-wife was nuts. Can you imagine what her kids would be like if she had sole legal and physical custody? They would be killing animals, wetting the beds, and starting fires.
@@scottcampbell4678 I know... It's horrifying to realize people who have full responsibility for the care of small humans.
exactly why I didn't engage with my exam luckily he only wanted 'things' not our children- I let him have everything and kept my children, finances everything myself He then dropped out of their lives until he had a stroke 3 yrs ago and expected them both to help him!
Get a packed lunch 🎉🎉 its an all dayer😂❤❤❤🇬🇧✌🏼🔊🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼