@@Blade.5786 i think it's fair to say 15 is older, in the sense that comparing 15 to 14 is like having a conversation with yourself from a few years ago (when you were younger)
That actually interesting, it means more work, more money, more funny tasks, and more thinking - elo is not the only measure as well(speed, resource efficiency, complexity/simplicity of paradigm, the way you train it, etc - as an example of some), etc.
Yes any beginner to mid level chess player would have taken that knight, but the 3800 level Berserk chess AI see’s that it cannot be taken and so the knight is just chilling there.
Have ro admit, these Stockfish endgames are insane. You'd think humans would get jelly, but it's a true delight seeing these meta ideas Stockfish comes up with that make you think "Yes, and that is why he deserves to be 4,000." Stockfish -- when chess no longer speaks for itself.
Yes humans follow typical principles, like castling early, protect the king, do not give pawns for free and develop knights and bishop before queen and rock, but Stockfish see’s his own crazy ideas and so is like I will not follow thoese principles.
@@jout738 Humans cannot calculate as far ahead. That seems obvious, but it means a typical Grandmaster will be more prudent. Humans calculate a bit, in their mind see that pawn being pushed all the way to f7, and think "Hmm, that could be dangerous. Best not give my opponent that much counter-play." Stockfish, however, isn't bothered by such notions. Stockfish doesn't guess, he simply knows he's not in any real danger. There's also the meta level Levy mentions, where it seems Stockfish is literally baiting his opponent (Kf7), so he will play Rf3, eventually. I'm not sure this baiting is a real thing or nor, but if it is -- and that is quite possible -- we're looking at an entire different level of understanding of chess here (actually one that is quite more human). Stockfish appears to understand what his opponent 'thinks' will be a dangerous attack, but one he has already refuted, in his own 'head' (in fact, one he uses as a bait tatic to win the game). Fascinating stuff, really.
@@gladosadoree I'd guess that if the opponent didn't take the bait and attacked on the other side of the board, then stockfish's king on F7 would be good as well. So doomed if you take the bait, doomed if you don't.
@@icycloud6823 I'm a pretty low-level player. I have a solid 2200 ELO, still way, way below Levy, and astrometrically far away from Stockfish. I would have played Kd7 too, and not have thought much of it either. And still don't get the whole Kf7 idea, I must admit. Maybe it's like a Magnus thing, where he kinda does nothing for a while, waiting for his opponent to take a wrong turn? At my level, losing tempi tends to be deadly. At Stockfish level -- and to a degree where Magnus lives -- the rules of the game apear to change, kinda like how standard physics changes at quantum level.😄In those upper echelons, all these puny rules I'm bound by, no longer apply. Stockfish can simply afford to toy with his opponent, and it doesn't matter, because he's better anyway.
@@gladosadoree this is why I'm so fascinated with engines, I imagine in the future new principles of chess could be established by these AI's forming their own "strategies"
Fat Fritz in SF means that Stockfish in this game basically played against a previous version of Stockfish. You may have noticed the lawsuit of Stockfish v Chessbase, which is exactly about that. Chessbase just blatantly used Stockfish in their Fat Fritz engine as the overwhelmingly major part of that engine. Conclusion of the lawsuit was that Chessbase has to say that Fat Fritz 2 is based on Stockfish everywhere Fat Fritz is mentioned
What's funny is that the engine stockfish is playing in this video is Houdini. Which is ironic because Houdini is another well known copy paste of stockfish.
It's kinda funny: Chess used to be violent, "romantic", attacking chess with pawns flying of the board, then it got a lot more quiet and positional when engines got stronger and stronger and now it's returning to what it once was, at least at the highest level.
It is _just_ possible. You'd have to corner the King, then use the Bishop and Knight to nail four contiguous squares (possible iff knight and bishop are on the same color square).
400 elo: "pawns are useless, sacrifice them and get them out of the way" 2000 elo: "pawns are some of the most important pieces in chess, you need to keep them for positional value" 4000 elo: "pawns are useless, sacrifice them and get them out of the way"
@@Planet.Xplor3r oh yeah, I know, that's one reason I got rid of social media, I only do YT. My comment was rather highlighting Levy's awesome ability to entertain. There are other channels such as How Ridiculous or Mark Rober that I enjoy watching and they do long videos, or philosophical discussions from others, but most channels I watch that release daily videos are not nearly as entertaining as Levy.
@@mattburns617 Neat, its incredibly beneficial to focus on increasing one's attention span, as I have suffered from a short one in the past. Being able to focus on one thing and get it done in a single sitting or two feels incredibly satisfying and overall makes me feel much better about myself.
I believe the reason why Fat Fritz 2 is called "Fat Fritz 2 (in SF)" is because of the lawsuit the Stockfish Devs filed against ChessBase, saying that Fat Fritz 2 was violating GPL licence agreement. They've settled now, and I think Fat Fritz 2 must disclose that it's running SF underneath.
Just a friendly reminder that it's only been 26 years since computers first beat top ranked humans. And 17 years since computers became untouchable by top ranked humans. 7 years since Giraffe used neural networks to play at top levels (trained by example games) 5 years since AlphaZero dominated everyone after learning chess without any human training. This is just the beginning. Our parents remember when computers couldn't play chess. You probably shouldn't be using supernovas as your analogy, because you're not going to have anything left to compare to in 50, 100, or 500 years.
Fun fact: the eval bar doesn't make much sense in these games as those engines vastly outperform the relatively low-depth Stockfish analysis that gives the evaluation in real-time.
Stockfish is now currently the best Chess computer, according to Stockfish Edit: Stop replying about religion, why not just respect each other's beliefs?
@@honeypopsicle1461 I'm not surprised if a phone app can beat Hikaru 10-0. I mean it's insane how this Stockfish plays considering it's stronger than the other bots and that other bots can comfortably crush the world's best GMs.
Yep, the idea is the same: you take it and then the pawn takes its place that you can't recapture and mate is unavoidable. The only difference is, that in this game you actually can defend against mate. By sacrificing all your pieces, but still. In Magnus-Supi game there was no chance at all.
This moment at 18:53 Where you said we just don’t know made me cry Like how are these engines doing this What are these ideas I saw the bishop sack but like in the end of the line. Those computers are on a completely different trip with chess. Almost alien
stockfish is like that one dude who lets you get an advantage lets you beat him up, and then soon you realize he is actually 10x stronger than you I mean look at his games, literally almost everygame his material is lower than the opponent. dude's a menace
I don't know if anyone ever told you this but you are the David Attenborough of chess commentary! You're a legend, please never stop what you're doing.
LOVE IT. 960 4000 Engines... They are spectacular: Insane sacrifices... Naked kingwalks, Not taking free pieces(last ladder made really made me laugh)... It's just PERFECT.
The coolest thing about this isn't necessarily just that the AI can play like this. It's also that there are undiscovered levels of chess, where moves that humans haven't even thought of in a thousand years of chess history, still exists. It's like finding out that after exploring the ocean, there was actually some kind of deeper ocean beyond what we knew existed that is maybe impossible for humans to get to. But we still want to try to get there anyways. Imagine how smart and how skilled you would have to be as a human to be able to do what Stockfish is doing. Will humans ever be able to get on that level? Maybe. It's a little trippy thinking about.
@@vinbin423 I see it like NBA2K, where the awareness and efficiency of our movements in the game (due to the top down view allowing superhuman levels of court reading ability IRL) are examples of what people may be able to do in the future.
I wish the eval meter was the same stockfish that’s playing to see what it thinks as the game goes on, but also very funny to see the eval meter go down on various moves the 15.1 does
6:40 That means Fat Fritz 2 in Stockfish because Fat Fritz actually took Stockfish 12 and used it in their own chess computer. That's also why Stockfish sued Fat Fritz for stealing their engine.
Give it a bishop and a knight and I believe that would be mate in 40, assuming Stockfish is running on a potato. Edit: To clarify, Martin has no chance in hell here.
Stockfish will probably crash. There's was a big discussion few days ago when someone complained about a crash caused by a buffer overflow with 24 queens on the board, and the Stockfish devs were like "not real chess, GTFO".
Sometimes I wonder what the rough average rating is of where people start knowing the knight bishop checkmate. I always figured it's the least of my worries with my skill level.
when SF plays e5 that is defended by four pieces its EEEEE FIIIIIIVE(14:15) but when I play it levy says what are you doing bozo that square is defended by four pieces
Computers with high elo are super agressive and in their mind to castle is not a good move since it doesnt bring em closer to the win and it gives a free move to the opponent.
The sacrifice in the last game to make a mating net reminded me of the famous queen sac by Luiz Supi against Magnus Carlsen during a banter blitz session.. 👌👌
With an elo of probably 0 (I don't even really know what elo means), watching this is like Shakespear. I don't necessarily understand everything that's happening, but I get it enough, and it's beautiful enough that you can just let it wash over you
It’s a measure of skill based on your match history, the higher your elo, the better you are, and you gain and lose more or less elo depending on your opponents elo. If you’re 1000 elo and win against someone 500, you get fuck all. If you’re 500 and win against a 1000, you get a fuck ton
Wait just a minute... the modern engines, as Levy said, would rather attack the king than maintain the balance in pieces and pawns. That's 100% how I play all my games lol (930 elo :D)
Pls let levi see this. 23:23 The reason why stockfish did not take rook directly in last game is that if stockfish takes rook with knight, Komodo's Knight can jumps in so one rook sac will be sufficient. However, if take with king then two rock sac is required.......... Just amazing
400 Elo: Brings queen out early.
2500 Elo: Does not bring queen out early.
4000 Elo: Brings queen out early.
400 Elo: Brings queen out TOO early. 4000 Elo: Brings out queen early. Big difference
40,000 Elo: Does not being queen out early
400,000 Elo: Brings out queen early
4 000 000 elo: brings out queen very late.
40 000 000 elo: brings out queen on the second move.
But he said it's quite common to bring your Queen out in Fisher Random.
4 000 000 000 Elo: Brings out queen on first move.
i love how there's stockfish evaluating stockfish, it's like when your little brother is cheering you on but he's not helping
underrated comment
good comment
Accurately rated comment
Be your own biggest fan
@@AkkiraVH uNdErRaTEd cOmMeNt
Me : * Blunders *
Me : * Resigns *
Stockfish : * Blunders *
Stockfish's opponent : * Resigns *
😂
When a 400 elo dude gives you a free knight, he has no hope left, when a 4000 fish gives you a free knight, you have no hope left
Lol
😂 😂
@@kristyandesouza5980 isn't alphazero the one who does that?
Komodo: *Moves*
Stockfish: "Mate in 30"
428 likes and no comments? Let me change that
@@Eternal_Void599🤖
Died from laughter
Dfl 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Like that one bosnian ape video. *move* stockfish: this is komodo’s first mistake, and the game is already over for them
hilarious when levy is commentating computer chess and using phrases like: "and we have another top engine move", "this computer is a machine"
😂😂😂😂
Love how the eval bar has no clue
First time I can relate to a chess bot
Stockfish Jr.: Huh???
Stockfish: Observe, youngling.
@@alzhanvoidUhm ackshually Stockfish 15 is younger than Stockfish 14 🤓
@@Blade.5786 took me a while to get that😂
@@Blade.5786 i think it's fair to say 15 is older, in the sense that comparing 15 to 14 is like having a conversation with yourself from a few years ago (when you were younger)
imagine programming a 3600 elo ai and it gets destroyed 90 games out of 92
Houdini is a well known stockfish clone so I'm sure the dev will just copy paste the new stockfish changes very quickly
@@dingo9696 💀💀💀
That actually interesting, it means more work, more money, more funny tasks, and more thinking - elo is not the only measure as well(speed, resource efficiency, complexity/simplicity of paradigm, the way you train it, etc - as an example of some), etc.
I think it’s out of 100, so there were 8 draws
@@MrMoptop2 yeah exactly
"This computer is a machine" Levy 2022
LOL
I heard that and was like uhhhh YEA??
Technicallythetruth
the floor is the ground
@@pronori And the start is the beginning
That knight chilling with the enemies pawns is hilarious af
Dude be like
How do you do fellow black pieces
knight be like
how do you do fellow blacks
pony be like
how do you do fellow blacks?
Replies be like
How do you do fellow gentlemen
Yes any beginner to mid level chess player would have taken that knight, but the 3800 level Berserk chess AI see’s that it cannot be taken and so the knight is just chilling there.
Levy was so impressed, that at 15:55 he literally forgot to roll up his other sleeve 😂
how u notice that hahah
he was just preparing for after the video shoot
High elo makes him horny
how u notice that heheh
how u notice that hihih
how u notice that hohoh
I would die to see stockfish play duck chess
yes! that would be epic!
As fun as it may sound, it would require tons of investment for programmers to find a way to program a stockfish to play a different type of game.
@@SorakaOTP462 who cares make it happen
BuT If YoU dIe YoU wOn'T bE aBlE tO sEe
@@RishabhSharma10225 not if my eyes die last lol
I feel like seeing Stockfish 15.1 just play expanded my brain ten-fold
Literally bringing new things to the table
Have ro admit, these Stockfish endgames are insane. You'd think humans would get jelly, but it's a true delight seeing these meta ideas Stockfish comes up with that make you think "Yes, and that is why he deserves to be 4,000."
Stockfish -- when chess no longer speaks for itself.
Yes humans follow typical principles, like castling early, protect the king, do not give pawns for free and develop knights and bishop before queen and rock, but Stockfish see’s his own crazy ideas and so is like I will not follow thoese principles.
@@jout738 Humans cannot calculate as far ahead. That seems obvious, but it means a typical Grandmaster will be more prudent. Humans calculate a bit, in their mind see that pawn being pushed all the way to f7, and think "Hmm, that could be dangerous. Best not give my opponent that much counter-play." Stockfish, however, isn't bothered by such notions. Stockfish doesn't guess, he simply knows he's not in any real danger. There's also the meta level Levy mentions, where it seems Stockfish is literally baiting his opponent (Kf7), so he will play Rf3, eventually. I'm not sure this baiting is a real thing or nor, but if it is -- and that is quite possible -- we're looking at an entire different level of understanding of chess here (actually one that is quite more human). Stockfish appears to understand what his opponent 'thinks' will be a dangerous attack, but one he has already refuted, in his own 'head' (in fact, one he uses as a bait tatic to win the game). Fascinating stuff, really.
@@gladosadoree I'd guess that if the opponent didn't take the bait and attacked on the other side of the board, then stockfish's king on F7 would be good as well. So doomed if you take the bait, doomed if you don't.
@@icycloud6823 I'm a pretty low-level player. I have a solid 2200 ELO, still way, way below Levy, and astrometrically far away from Stockfish. I would have played Kd7 too, and not have thought much of it either. And still don't get the whole Kf7 idea, I must admit. Maybe it's like a Magnus thing, where he kinda does nothing for a while, waiting for his opponent to take a wrong turn?
At my level, losing tempi tends to be deadly. At Stockfish level -- and to a degree where Magnus lives -- the rules of the game apear to change, kinda like how standard physics changes at quantum level.😄In those upper echelons, all these puny rules I'm bound by, no longer apply. Stockfish can simply afford to toy with his opponent, and it doesn't matter, because he's better anyway.
@@gladosadoree this is why I'm so fascinated with engines, I imagine in the future new principles of chess could be established by these AI's forming their own "strategies"
Fat Fritz in SF means that Stockfish in this game basically played against a previous version of Stockfish. You may have noticed the lawsuit of Stockfish v Chessbase, which is exactly about that. Chessbase just blatantly used Stockfish in their Fat Fritz engine as the overwhelmingly major part of that engine. Conclusion of the lawsuit was that Chessbase has to say that Fat Fritz 2 is based on Stockfish everywhere Fat Fritz is mentioned
What's funny is that the engine stockfish is playing in this video is Houdini. Which is ironic because Houdini is another well known copy paste of stockfish.
It's kinda funny: Chess used to be violent, "romantic", attacking chess with pawns flying of the board, then it got a lot more quiet and positional when engines got stronger and stronger and now it's returning to what it once was, at least at the highest level.
Fischer random tends to be less drawish than the traditional starting position, allowing for more violent games
Levi: “respect the computer for being fat, thats not nice.”
Also Levi: “San Francisco is literally all car jackers.”
Me: wow Sf 15.1 is amazing
Levi: SF knows how to mate with a bishop and a knight
Me: (spits drink out) YOU CAN DO THAT?
It is _just_ possible. You'd have to corner the King, then use the Bishop and Knight to nail four contiguous squares (possible iff knight and bishop are on the same color square).
This is a historic moment right here, from 400 elo to 4000 elo.
400 elo: "pawns are useless, sacrifice them and get them out of the way"
2000 elo: "pawns are some of the most important pieces in chess, you need to keep them for positional value"
4000 elo: "pawns are useless, sacrifice them and get them out of the way"
The difference is that 4000s sacrifice them while 400s blunder them.
"This computer is a machine"
- Levy 2022
Fascinating how I can comfortably watch a Gotham 30 minute video every day, but other channels I can't even last 5 minutes.
Faxx
Try lasting longer than 5 minutes in all places, it will benefit you.
@@Planet.Xplor3r oh yeah, I know, that's one reason I got rid of social media, I only do YT. My comment was rather highlighting Levy's awesome ability to entertain. There are other channels such as How Ridiculous or Mark Rober that I enjoy watching and they do long videos, or philosophical discussions from others, but most channels I watch that release daily videos are not nearly as entertaining as Levy.
@@Planet.Xplor3r "in all places"
I cannot not tell what you are alluding to 🗿
@@mattburns617 Neat, its incredibly beneficial to focus on increasing one's attention span, as I have suffered from a short one in the past. Being able to focus on one thing and get it done in a single sitting or two feels incredibly satisfying and overall makes me feel much better about myself.
So now the elo difference between me and Magnus is almost the same as the one between Magnus and Stockfish lol
By definition of ELO this means you have the same chance of winning vs Magnus as Magnus has vs Stockfish
Ooooh that's interesting
@@patrickwienhoft7987 which is zero :)
@@kentoutcourt according to the standard ELO calculations it's 0.3%
However, admiddetly I don't know how draws factor in.
@@patrickwienhoft7987 theres no way I’d win 1/300 games against Magnus
when Levi said "it's ok to not know" gave me a feeling that someone cared about me and I haven't felt that feeling in a long time
I believe the reason why Fat Fritz 2 is called "Fat Fritz 2 (in SF)" is because of the lawsuit the Stockfish Devs filed against ChessBase, saying that Fat Fritz 2 was violating GPL licence agreement.
They've settled now, and I think Fat Fritz 2 must disclose that it's running SF underneath.
the accusations of other engines like Houdini being clones is pretty fascinating
“This computer is a machine.” 12:50
This made my day.
Even in endgames this computer is a machine
- levy 2022 -
Stockfish just pulled an “Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak” tactic in the last game. 💀💀💀
Stockfish won 90 games out of a hundred, houdini won 2 and 6 were a draw.
Oh Boy i can't wait to find out what the missing 2 games were counted as.
Crimes against humanity!
He said as the first game simulation ended Stockfish won 92.
forfeited because of the illegal use of a human.
Houdini just threw the board off the table in those 2
houdini caught using nieman beads
To me, a mere mortal, watching Stockfish play is like watching a supernova explode in real time and up close.
Just a friendly reminder that it's only been 26 years since computers first beat top ranked humans.
And 17 years since computers became untouchable by top ranked humans.
7 years since Giraffe used neural networks to play at top levels (trained by example games)
5 years since AlphaZero dominated everyone after learning chess without any human training.
This is just the beginning. Our parents remember when computers couldn't play chess.
You probably shouldn't be using supernovas as your analogy, because you're not going to have anything left to compare to in 50, 100, or 500 years.
@@tomc.5704 The Big Bang.
@@piotrbugaj5179 literal God couldn’t beat a chess computer at chess at this point.
@@gamingmoyai3950 God would have a 32-piece table base, so unbeatable.
Fun fact: the eval bar doesn't make much sense in these games as those engines vastly outperform the relatively low-depth Stockfish analysis that gives the evaluation in real-time.
An engine called Berserk diving its queen into the enemy ranks at move 3 is just funny.
This is the definition of "when you do it, it's dumb, when the engine does it, it's seeing 30 moves ahead"
18:48 I love how he said queen side even though the queens started on H1
it's fischer random. in normal chess, that is the queenside.
Hey Gotham, have you ever won a game with 1.Na3 or 1.Nh3?
Pin of inquiry
@@recitationtohear what the fu
@@recitationtohear I had not been waiting so long for this.
he has, he has played the diamond opening Na3, Nb5, Nc3, Nb1
Don't engange with the bots, they are just fishing for your IP adress most likely.
Stockfish is now currently the best Chess computer, according to Stockfish
Edit: Stop replying about religion, why not just respect each other's beliefs?
which is the only thing we can trust to tell us what’s best. Is this how religions are started?
@@jackfarnsworth791 lmao exactly
@@jackfarnsworth791 woah im offended. how dare u insult jesus
@@parzival9983 wym, jesus apparently is cracked at chess
@@parzival9983 How is this insulting to jesus?
Honestly bro levys commentatory is bar none, such a good time.
Insane, an earlier version of Komodo defeated Hikaru 10-0
@@honeypopsicle1461 I'm not surprised if a phone app can beat Hikaru 10-0. I mean it's insane how this Stockfish plays considering it's stronger than the other bots and that other bots can comfortably crush the world's best GMs.
my friends at school: shut up stockfish im 5000 elo
me: scholars mates them
Bd4 in the last game immediately reminded me of the Supi-Magnus game where Supi did the same thing (with a queen though) and Magnus resigned.
im glad im not the only one who though that. I was looking to see if anyone had also thought the same thing
@@AcmJury Same, was trying to remember his name, just remembered he was Brazilian.
I literally watched that game from 5 shorts ago
Yep, the idea is the same: you take it and then the pawn takes its place that you can't recapture and mate is unavoidable. The only difference is, that in this game you actually can defend against mate. By sacrificing all your pieces, but still. In Magnus-Supi game there was no chance at all.
Growtopia
This moment at 18:53
Where you said we just don’t know made me cry
Like how are these engines doing this
What are these ideas
I saw the bishop sack but like in the end of the line. Those computers are on a completely different trip with chess. Almost alien
Levy's engine videos are some of the best chess content. Somehow these games brings out the best in him! Keep em coming! Love it!
The way Komodo fought and sacrificed to survive as long as possible was incredible. Like fighting off Mike Tyson when he's got you in the corner.
Considering exaxtly what Komodo did, You should throw gloves at Mike in the ring, spit mouthguard and end up stuck in the ropes 🥲
It's weird to see AI actions that replicate human valiance.
@@StrikeWarlock mate in 50 is better than mate in 1
stockfish is like that one dude who lets you get an advantage lets you beat him up, and then soon you realize he is actually 10x stronger than you
I mean look at his games, literally almost everygame his material is lower than the opponent.
dude's a menace
I don't know if anyone ever told you this but you are the David Attenborough of chess commentary! You're a legend, please never stop what you're doing.
When elo 400s loses a queen, we call it a blunder. But when stockfish does it, it's the best move in the history of this universe.
This is chessism
And us Chessists are mere exercisers of Chessism
When Stockfish lets its wife die you know you're heading to a dark place.
because in stockfishes case theres a reason they lose a queen
-🤓
LOVE IT. 960 4000 Engines... They are spectacular: Insane sacrifices... Naked kingwalks, Not taking free pieces(last ladder made really made me laugh)... It's just PERFECT.
agreed. true art
When I see Gotham make a video about Stockfish, I know it's going to be a good one.
16:48 "I don't care the pieces are random i want to play a KID structure" lol
The coolest thing about this isn't necessarily just that the AI can play like this. It's also that there are undiscovered levels of chess, where moves that humans haven't even thought of in a thousand years of chess history, still exists. It's like finding out that after exploring the ocean, there was actually some kind of deeper ocean beyond what we knew existed that is maybe impossible for humans to get to. But we still want to try to get there anyways.
Imagine how smart and how skilled you would have to be as a human to be able to do what Stockfish is doing. Will humans ever be able to get on that level? Maybe. It's a little trippy thinking about.
@@vinbin423 I see it like NBA2K, where the awareness and efficiency of our movements in the game (due to the top down view allowing superhuman levels of court reading ability IRL) are examples of what people may be able to do in the future.
23:28 The rook is sacrificed again!! 🤣🤣🤣
As a bozo with an ELO of 602, predicting the knight move at 13:28 was crazy
Basically humans created the knight as a joke piece and Stockfish came and said “alright” and created a weapon of mass destruction
"This computer is a machine"
- GothamChess 12:50
@13:23 He said this with such conviction I legit had to rewatch 10+ times. Hilarious!
I wish the eval meter was the same stockfish that’s playing to see what it thinks as the game goes on, but also very funny to see the eval meter go down on various moves the 15.1 does
I can confirm I can not checkmate with knight and bishop
The last games
bishop move felt like supi's queen sacrifice against magnus
I’d love to see stock fish in 3 player chess
I love how he gives each engine its own personality
"Even in endgames this computer is a machine" more brilliant commentary from Gotham Chess
15:41 stockfish playing the entire game before it even started:
There is going to be a new era of piece mobility
Gotham rn is every 600's reaction to making an "amazing play" which is actually 6 blunders
6:40 That means Fat Fritz 2 in Stockfish because Fat Fritz actually took Stockfish 12 and used it in their own chess computer. That's also why Stockfish sued Fat Fritz for stealing their engine.
"Castling is a waste of a move" - Stockfish 15.1
I like how in 100 games, stock fish won 90, hudini won 2, there were 6 draws, but that does not equal to 100
I like how stockfish evaluates the table as positive for him even without doing a single move 😂😂
6:48
Oppenent: *Exists*
Stockfish: "You've already lost."
(Spoiler: SF is objectively correct.)
white is always better
It might be useful to see the games SF lost in to get an idea of what could go wrong with such a super powerful engine
the fact that AI is now almost 5 times my elo is impressive and scary
That shit 10x'd me
Especially considered that elo rating is not linear. Doubling your elo is insanely hard.
It 2,5-ed me
1:11 The pawns are shuffled too
You Stockfish sound like a comedic and sadistic genius and I love it!
at least he had balls of bird at the start
But the real question is, can it beat Martin With 31 Queens?
Give it a bishop and a knight and I believe that would be mate in 40, assuming Stockfish is running on a potato.
Edit: To clarify, Martin has no chance in hell here.
Stockfish will probably crash. There's was a big discussion few days ago when someone complained about a crash caused by a buffer overflow with 24 queens on the board, and the Stockfish devs were like "not real chess, GTFO".
Stockfish plays the moves i make just actually knowing why
I remember when people said 3600 was the God Elo and that would describe perfect play when a computer reached that strength
Stockfish is still in the upper 3600s in TCEC
Very entertaining and extremely enjoyable content, somehow you make watching chess games like watching a world cup match
Sometimes I wonder what the rough average rating is of where people start knowing the knight bishop checkmate. I always figured it's the least of my worries with my skill level.
It's worth at least going through a few times to see how the bishop and knight coordinate to force the king to the side of the board and then corner.
dang it i thought stockfish would finally be eliminated
when SF plays e5 that is defended by four pieces its EEEEE FIIIIIIVE(14:15) but when I play it levy says what are you doing bozo that square is defended by four pieces
gotham chess "This computer is a machine"
I miss AlphaZero. Watching it slaughter Stockfish was always enjoyable
AlphaZero still exists, it is what powers Leela
Stockfish slaughters alpha zero now a days
Alpha Zero was a scam.
They never showed on which hardware stockfish was using.
@@someone-jl4sj Why does that matter?
@@mathdeep That is not true at all lmao what do you mean "powers Leela" 🤣
Computers with high elo are super agressive and in their mind to castle is not a good move since it doesnt bring em closer to the win and it gives a free move to the opponent.
who needs magnus when you have stockfish
Idk how I saw that last mate when my elo is so low
100 games, Stockfish won 90, 6 draws, 2 losses. Wait?!
It's 2025 and engines still didn't reach up to 3900 😂
Love stockfish content, please do it once a week.
The sacrifice in the last game to make a mating net reminded me of the famous queen sac by Luiz Supi against Magnus Carlsen during a banter blitz session.. 👌👌
I love the fact that stockfish is litteraly the nostradamus of chess
This computer is a machine
can't wait for the day stockfish passes 10,000
End of humanity
@@alexnistor2836 this is already ended
I saw bishop to d4 a bit before it happened while I’m a 1000 elo player but thought it was a bad move till you showed it
With an elo of probably 0 (I don't even really know what elo means), watching this is like Shakespear. I don't necessarily understand everything that's happening, but I get it enough, and it's beautiful enough that you can just let it wash over you
It’s a measure of skill based on your match history, the higher your elo, the better you are, and you gain and lose more or less elo depending on your opponents elo. If you’re 1000 elo and win against someone 500, you get fuck all. If you’re 500 and win against a 1000, you get a fuck ton
12:50 "This Computer is a Machine." this line just killed me 😂😂
Wait just a minute... the modern engines, as Levy said, would rather attack the king than maintain the balance in pieces and pawns. That's 100% how I play all my games lol (930 elo :D)
Pls let levi see this. 23:23 The reason why stockfish did not take rook directly in last game is that if stockfish takes rook with knight, Komodo's Knight can jumps in so one rook sac will be sufficient. However, if take with king then two rock sac is required.......... Just amazing
Amazing, only Hans Moke Niemann can play this well
12:48
"This computer is a machine."
Indeed it is, GothamChess.
this was one of my favorites videos you've posted on this channel
In the second game at 7:20 isn't the rook hanging