It's funny to me that a bunch of GMs came together and said "Damn, this guy is too good at chess, let's beat his ass" and this is how this game came to be
Not really....different players have different playing styles to play chess...some like to defend,some attack, some try to have a highly defensive opening waiting for a weakly defended area to rush into....etc.
Humans are difficult creatures . They create a team to defeat Gary then they lose . They create a machine to do the same job but then they end up supporting him .
@@jsweeney7359 Yeah, that was idiotic on my part. I forgot I even made this comment, probably did it while half-asleep or some shit. Regardless, I'll keep it up in order to own my stupidity.
He defeated some of the greatest chess players of all time then defeated the entire world. In his entire life there were only two opponents he could not best: Deep Blue and Vladimir Putin.
Kasparov actually did beat Deep Blue 4-2 under tournament conditions, he just much more famously lost in their rematch 3.5-2.5 (so still winning two games and drawing)
@@tadhgknight3484 Also taking into account IBM refused to let him see Deep Blue's test games to prep before the rematch. I have little doubt that, had he been able to prepare accordingly (and fairly, no shade to Deep Blue's actual team, screw you IBM), he would have beaten Deep Blue again.
He cheated a young judit polgar face to face, on cam. Look it up. Knowing his personality irl, im convinced he was spying here. Gary is not a man to be respected.
@@jootpepet It was said that it wouldn’t be cheating for him to look at the bulletin board. So, even assuming you are right about him looking at it, you’re wrong about him cheating. Regardless, even if he did look at it, he still found an amazing move that no one else had thought of. That in itself is worthy of respect. I don’t know him personally, so I won’t say if I respect him personally, but I can still respect the mans chess.
@@saurabhkumarsingh3986 “You can do this thing and it isn’t cheating” “Oh okay” *Maybe does it* “That cheaaatiing! You can’t do that!” Like wtf you want man?
Garry Kasparov: Takes to town all of GM's squad and plays moves that no one even saw comming, approaching bs tier smart. Also Gerry: Gets bodied by old, sick and about to die Tal who escaped from hospital just to play, making it the only loss for Garry in the whole tournament. Absolute savage. (1992)
Fun fact from Garry's Masterclass: Chess a very physically taxing game, so its important to be physically fit. He could do 100 pushups back in his prime.
Imagine Stockfish vs The Entire World match today. It'd be cool to see a group of GMs playing some sharp openenings and cooperatring trying to make a draw (or even win, sometimes engines don't see crazy stuff in crazy positions) against a computer xD
I participated in voting on the moves in this game. Each country or region had an assigned GM who would both analyze, suggest, receive votes and suggestions, and then cast a vote along with the other GMs. The board would post both the GM's votes and the popular votes of everyone involved. The majority of the GM's votes is what move was used. I actually recieved a Tshirt that I have to this day. It has a design of some chess pieces and has the words: Kasporav vs. the World
@@kidjr.9520 You didnt have to be a GM to cast a vote, but mostly only GM suggestions were played (due to the moves being better obviously and more votes)
Irina Krush was a BEAST. She finally made Grandmaster in 2013, I actually met her. She came to my University chess club once, on her way to another tournament. Very nice and gracious lady. She was putting up complex endgame problems for us to solve, and then interacting with our top 2 players (who were 1900 and 2100 rated). She did have a Russian Accent, but it wasn't too heavy. When I met her, she had just become a GM.
He admitted that he was looking through the MSN board where we were analyzing. The game itself was actually analyzed to be a draw, if it was continued instead of resigned.
People kept voting her moves because she was the highest rated GM on the "world" team. Her peak rating was 2500 compared to Kasparov who was over 2800 at the time. If there were more top players analyzing and advising moves then Kasparov likely would not have won.
as a new player to chess, I'm only 5 minutes into the video and I've learned a million things already! Great analysis and complex gameplay = super fun. Keep up the great content!! :D
I followed this at the time and participated in some of the discussions about the next move. The most common comment made was, "The world is not a very good chess player."
I, too, was a participant. And yes, chess by committee was not so good. I have to disagree with Levy, though. Irina did "bully" some of the play; I remember being passionately opposed to one of the moves; thinking we were missing an opportunity. But it was more a function that she was more invested in the game [and most of her moves were brilliant] and in the community than the other "advisors". In many respects, she was the first Social Media Influencer [Hot Take (tm)]. It was an influential game; and unique. Collaboration/kibitzing can be a very invigorating learning experience.
Hi Gotham/levy. In the past year i have studied a lot and gotten a lot of help out of your content and courses...about an hour ago i finally made it to 1700. I just wanted to thank you on behalf of all subscribers and fans. We appreciate you and all the hard work you do for us all. Thank you!
probably say the same thing about any of the women champions from any country during that era of chess. the focus of the chess world was on Kasparov, not the women champions, the U.S. and soviet women included. were there U.S. women champions? oh yes. name one? hmmmmm. yep, have to look it up. look up the age of irina krush when she won her first US championship.
@@DipsAndPushups That's unfair to Irina since the team had already proven a draw with her suggestion of 51...Ka1 but the voting was tampered with and 51...b5 played instead.
Wait, what? She was in highschool?! After you started talking about her, my mind definitely didn't portrait anyone near that age. Awesome. Amazing idea and brilliant game. Thank you for that coverage.
actually, i just looked it up and 3/4 of the people analyzing the moves were in high school, or at least high school age. the fourth was 19 at the time of the game.
@@Ryan_Boyland You mean the people 'suggesting' the moves.. there were hundreds of people analyzing the moves (I am happy to have been one of them! :D)
Man I love how Levy is passionate and enthusiastic about these games, it really makes you appreciate and savour every move. He explains everything in such a beatuiful way that even a noob like me can understand such a high level game. Keep doing what you're doing man, amazing content.
I'd love to see something like this happen these days. Maybe super-GMs vs stockfish(with time odds), get them all together in a conference hall and have them take a go at it over a day or two. If it was a somewhat limited pool made up only of those who had a career in chess, I think it could work without cheating.
I remember this game being mentioned in the news in 1999. At the time I thought that 1000 rated players had equal voting power to all the other GMs so of *course* Kasparov won. Very interesting to see the analysis 22 years later.
I was active for the world during this game. I must point out that at the time Irina Krush was 12 or 13 years old. Her coach at the time was GM Ron Henley. She openly talked of this on the website at the time. Over time Irina became the main influencer for the “world”. So basically this game almost came down to a postal game between Henley and Kasparov. During one move, Henley was preoccupied and couldn’t get a move to Krush in time, she mad a superficial suggestion, which the world followed, which turned out to be a blunder. So the world eventually threw away the draw. I just wanted to make sure GM Ron Henley finally gets his due credit.
@Douglas Legvold Your recollection of this game is faulty. Irina was 16. Ron Henley had less importance in the game than you suggest (aside from encouraging Irina to actually suggest her move ...Qe6). The delay in Irina's move suggestion had nothing to do with Henley, but rather was (as Levi stated) due to an email glitch when she sent her email very late at night and went to bed before it was actually sent (outbox lag could easily happen back then). Her 'superficial' suggestion was in fact the better move than the one played (although still ultimately would have lost). And ultimately the deciding factor is the vote stuffing that occurred on move 51. which allowed the inferior move 51...b5 to win over the line 51...Ka1 we had analyzed to a draw!
Lemme get this straight, this guy streams for hours every single day, and then makes not one, but TWO quality youtube videos EVERYDAY. Holy crap I respect his commitment, keep up the good work Levy.
I read Kasparov's book on this game; something I found slightly unsatisfying was that Kasparov *wasn't* playing unaided; he did have a team helping him with analysis. So really it was Team Kasparov vs the World.
I remember when I first started getting into chess years ago, watching GM game analysis from the likes of Chess24 or Mato Jelic, and just being totally and utterly confused at the point of some of the moves, even after some explanation. Doesn't happen so much anymore, but this is the first time in a long time I've felt totally out of my depth watching a game analysis. What a beautiful game, Garry really was an absolute monster of a player.
your videos are so instructive, entertaining, almost precise, and smooth levy. how the heck do you memorize everything that you want to say? or do you make notes on what to say? you even say vote percentages accurately, you remember every move on the board, things they said about the game, history of some of the players and 99.9% of the time u dont even pause or edit the video or something. you're the best chess teacher vs the world.
Your passion and research are commendable. You’ve found an intersection of passion and skill and are sharing it with all of us. Thank you so much Gotham!
14:47 actually browser stockfish immediately recognizes kh1 as the best move (and it stays that way), but props to Gary for being stockfish before stockfish
This actually made me cry. Absolutely gorgeous video, great game and great stories behind it, great presentation. Good shit man. I never thought something chess related would ever make me cry (unless it is frustration from losing).
Imagine the day it was decided that such a match is gonna be played. Person1-"Garry Kasparov ,its you against the world" Garry- "It wouldnt be fair otherwise" Such a badasss!!
This is the first ever video that I watched of this channel. This man right here got me into chess. With this exact video. Life is so great sometimes. Just whoa!
I just want to thank you for your content man! Even it's just some tiles and some pieces on the board your storytelling make the games feel even more alive than they are for any chess enthusiast. Great stuff, I was better entertained than I am in most movies!
Thank you so much for the intense lore behind the match, that's the most exciting aspect; I had watched another video about this game, but its quality wasn't even closer to yours
I played this video at half speed to make it easier to follow the logic of the moves. So I watched this for almost an hour and was completely absorbed. You make chess incredibly entertaining and educational!
Could it not be done on a smaller scale? Lock a load of GMs in a room with cameras and a projector, watch them arguing about different candidate moves while Magnus sips his water? I’d watch it
@@ianmendham6671 for 24 hours per move? Where a long game can take months? at the very most we can have like 5 gms play against him but it can’t be correspondence.
On April 13th 36 years ago, Garry Chess - The inventor of Chess - Invented Chess. If Gotham Chess - son of Garry chess - does not make a video commemorating that beautiful day... We will revolt
This reminds me of the recent r/place event, with communities coordinating and working together towards a common goal. Great video, just as good as advertised! I saw the clip of you saying that this is your favorite video of yours, and I think it's definitely up there.
Who is the world? This sounds like a cool story I've never heard of, you should dive deeper in the lore and history in videos this is awesome content! And great game btw!
It's as he stated, it was a public internet forum on MSN responsible for discussing and submitting the moves. Each side was given 24 hours per move. Grandmaster Daniel King, currently running the PowerPlayChess youtube channel, was one of the top level GMs brought in to help the board, and co-wrote (with Kasparov) a book on this game in 2000 called "Kasparov Against the World: The Story of the Greatest Online Challenge".
I was following this game when it happened. As I recall, there was the possibility of entering a voter move more than once and subsequently some trollers nullified Irina's suggestion in that endgame by packing the questionable move which would have drawn. I don't remember which move it was. There was a lot of discussion condemning this at the time.
The move that was a draw was 51...Ka1 (Recommended by Irina and much of the team Including myself), instead the voting was stuffed to allow the inferior 51...b5 to win.
This is the most insane chess game and chess story I've ever seen. It's sad that we can't get this kind of madness with modern-day chess. Amazing video
wasnt kasparov way stronger than other gms tho? im not sure so correct me if im wrong. magnus isnt in good shape anyways and im pretty sure he would lose
@@MozzeeFootball I feel like Magnus could easily take multiple super GMs, so could any other super GM take on multiple other super GMs. Players are stronger than in the past, but close to a perfect play is possible by both parties. I feel like it'd be super close
I like to imagine that when the world resigned, it was voted upon like any other move. 11% for queen here, 13% for queen there, 25% for king this way, and 51% fuck it we give up
Thank you for covering this game, Gotham. I'd heard of it, but had never seen it. It has to go down as a highlight of a now lost era. Fascinating stuff.
The match summed up:
*Garry moves a piece*
The world: Oh ffs
I spat out my tea ya fooker :)
This is amazing 😂
Never have I wanted to save a comment so bad before today.
*Garry moves a piece*
The world: Holy hell!
The world : *shocked Pikachu face*
"And on october 1999, the world resigned." Well that's a new sentence alright
Just in time for Y2K
R/brandnewsentence
@@JuneJuIyAugust r/foundthemobileuser
"World team" :d
Thats sad lol
It's funny to me that a bunch of GMs came together and said "Damn, this guy is too good at chess, let's beat his ass" and this is how this game came to be
Ikr, the game wasn't even that good, lasted for 4 fucking months.
@@ShubhamKumar-rw9lk yes, but moves were made every 24 hours. In total 62 moves
@@user-sh2ij8hy9p for both sides right
Not really....different players have different playing styles to play chess...some like to defend,some attack, some try to have a highly defensive opening waiting for a weakly defended area to rush into....etc.
It would have been better if they had made groups and assigned each piece to a group, like every knight moves to be thought by group 1 and so on...
Humans are difficult creatures .
They create a team to defeat Gary then they lose .
They create a machine to do the same job but then they end up supporting him .
The machine had already beaten Kasparov for the first time in 1997
this sounds like an anime plot
@Jim Figgers shut up
@@paulbarbat1926 Kasparov had also beaten deep blue
@@familiasosa6379 yes but in overall score, IBM Machine won.
1991: USSR splits up
1999: Soviet GM school joins the match against Garry Kasparov
2021: Ah yeah, Soviet Union never dies
@Marius Marin OUR fight
@@张桓瑜 r/suddenlycommunist
aged well
2022: You're never gonna believe this
@@BlitzyYenAttacker3000 how? Russia is completely capitalist, wtf are you on about?
"Garry Kasparov forces The World to resign." Would be a pretty badass headline
no one was ever forced to resign, though
In addition, this would have spoiled the ending for people like myself, who haven't seen it before.
@@yordanangelov9786 Why would someone who doesn't want to be spoiled be looking through the comments before fully watching it?
@@mcprince5098 the headline would be the title of the video, he's referring to the fact that the title would spoil the end result
@@jsweeney7359 Yeah, that was idiotic on my part. I forgot I even made this comment, probably did it while half-asleep or some shit. Regardless, I'll keep it up in order to own my stupidity.
"Is he here? Is Garry among us?"
Kasparov was the Imposter.
Irina Krush was not the Imposter
1 imposter remaining
Defeat
Kasparov was the impostor
The cringe this comment radiates is deadly
@@luciddream5055 fr
@@luciddream5055 😥
Garry Susparov
Levy while choosing his hoodies
It seems kinda equal but black is slightly better here
good one
Grandmaster comment 🏆
Hoodie racism
He's the time traveling Hoodie Guy that plays all these games Agadmator features.
nice
You're a fantastic story-teller, so pleased you and NL paired up.
Totally agree. He makes the pieces seem like people.
"It's a problem!" was a moment in the analysis that made me really feel that way
Who's NL?
@@mahadiaman9617 Mark
@@Chizzle69420 Mark who?
nl?
He defeated some of the greatest chess players of all time then defeated the entire world. In his entire life there were only two opponents he could not best: Deep Blue and Vladimir Putin.
tbf
Garry did beat deep blue
just the younger Deep blue
while putin
uhhh
This is the best comment 😄
And now Putin is playing the world with real pieces, and there's much debate over sacrificed pawns.
Kasparov actually did beat Deep Blue 4-2
under tournament conditions, he just much more famously lost in their rematch 3.5-2.5 (so still winning two games and drawing)
@@tadhgknight3484 Also taking into account IBM refused to let him see Deep Blue's test games to prep before the rematch. I have little doubt that, had he been able to prepare accordingly (and fairly, no shade to Deep Blue's actual team, screw you IBM), he would have beaten Deep Blue again.
5:08 They wanted to beat Kasparov so bad, they brought back the Soviet union
From the grave!
I was gonna say, how was there a Soviet chess team in 1999?
@@Lucktar no one ever talks about how they executed all the chess players when the berlin wall fell ;-;
@@shoblette961 what?
@@shoblette961 wait WHAT
Not gonna lie, chess seems like it was a lot more fun before engines
We had two computers running 24/7 analysis lines during that game. But still they were not as efficient as 30 seconds of stockfish today.
There were engines, just human minds were stronger than them. Nowadays this kind of match would be impossible because of the engines though
Sad!
@@vidblogger12 That was in 2005, computers had like 100 times less computational power than nowadays. You still make good points though.
i found bobby fischer's yt account
Garry played a move that the entire world didn’t think about. Dude isn’t even on another level, he’s on another planet
edit* Garry cause autocorrect
He cheated a young judit polgar face to face, on cam. Look it up.
Knowing his personality irl, im convinced he was spying here. Gary is not a man to be respected.
@@jootpepet It was said that it wouldn’t be cheating for him to look at the bulletin board. So, even assuming you are right about him looking at it, you’re wrong about him cheating.
Regardless, even if he did look at it, he still found an amazing move that no one else had thought of. That in itself is worthy of respect. I don’t know him personally, so I won’t say if I respect him personally, but I can still respect the mans chess.
@@Isometrix116 If you have access to opponent's strategy, its much easier to look for moves they are not thinking about. Gary cheated big time
@@saurabhkumarsingh3986 but they agreed it isn't cheating so what's your point
@@saurabhkumarsingh3986 “You can do this thing and it isn’t cheating”
“Oh okay”
*Maybe does it*
“That cheaaatiing! You can’t do that!”
Like wtf you want man?
Garry Kasparov: Takes to town all of GM's squad and plays moves that no one even saw comming, approaching bs tier smart.
Also Gerry: Gets bodied by old, sick and about to die Tal who escaped from hospital just to play, making it the only loss for Garry in the whole tournament. Absolute savage. (1992)
I love Tal’s games so much that dude was a king
This man apologized for something that made him win
Fun fact from Garry's Masterclass: Chess a very physically taxing game, so its important to be physically fit. He could do 100 pushups back in his prime.
It's true. Professional esport too,many peoples thinks that Esport or chess is for unactive fat peoples.
@@landish9525 How many esports pros are in good condition? You have a few beasts, but many will flunk a basic hs test
@@JD-jc5hg no
Really? :DDD
@Pharting Feelings That's good that esports players physical health are being taken care of
"Kasparov vs The World" Sounds like the coolest title for a movie or series
@@cypherkoro6553 "When Kasparov falls for Ramona Flowers" is a sentence I never expected to read, but here we are. Waiting for that AU to drop
@@cypherkoro6553 sell the idea to Edgar Wright, he'll know what to do with it
nah, it sounds like uzi watched queens gambit and got inspired
Scott pilgrim vs the world is a movie
Reminds me of the documentary called "Bobby Fisher VS the world"
Levy, you should cover Deep Blue vs. Garry Kasparov as well!
Deep Blue won because he was cheating! If you look closely you can see that he was using an engine! Nobody can beat Garry Chess, the founder of chess!
@@peterserman8987deep blue is an engine it cant cheat
@@kai-gg2ip bruh.
@@kai-gg2ip woosh
@@kai-gg2ip you need at least 5000 karma on reddit and deep London System knowledge to understand this
Imagine Stockfish vs The Entire World match today. It'd be cool to see a group of GMs playing some sharp openenings and cooperatring trying to make a draw (or even win, sometimes engines don't see crazy stuff in crazy positions) against a computer xD
They would get their butts kicked hard
even a phone stockfish would straighten up all the gms together
No human alive can beat stockfish. Only way it would be possible if the program bugs and makes mistake due to it.
Alpha Zero Vs The World & Stockfish
No human can win against stockfish, what are you talking about
This match is just so insane that they revived the Soviet Union.
Meow
I participated in voting on the moves in this game. Each country or region had an assigned GM who would both analyze, suggest, receive votes and suggestions, and then cast a vote along with the other GMs. The board would post both the GM's votes and the popular votes of everyone involved. The majority of the GM's votes is what move was used. I actually recieved a Tshirt that I have to this day. It has a design of some chess pieces and has the words: Kasporav vs. the World
@@711RoyGBiv are you a gm?
@@kidjr.9520 You didnt have to be a GM to cast a vote, but mostly only GM suggestions were played (due to the moves being better obviously and more votes)
@@kidjr.9520I wasn't a GM. I think my rating was only 1700 at the time. Just needed to sign up for the match.
This is officially the best video you have made to date, Levy. And I mean that as HIGH praise. I loved every moment of this!!
Imagine being such a chess genius that you beat the whole world. That’s incredible
He was looking at opponent's discussion board the whole time
@@saurabhkumarsingh3986 and the opponents were using engines, so they were both cheating tbh
@@fort809 engines of that era were not that powerful
@@saurabhkumarsingh3986 Stronger than a lot of players at that time. Remember Kasparov got beat by Deep Blue in 1999, the same year.
@@johannv.d1208 Kasparov got beat by Deep blue, a vefy specialized computer. Nobody had access to any tech nearly of that level
Tupac: I dissed New York
Eminem: I dissed loads of people around the world
Kasparov: The world dissed me and I won
Not gonna lie this comment is an absolute savagery
Pac had an album called Me Against The World, interestingly enough
Kasparov: *plays Bb5+*
Za Warudo: "Ho, ho, so you are approaching me?"
Ah yes jojo
1:00 if you watched ðe whole video and don't wanna look for it
"I cant save my prep without coming closer"
Irina Krush was a BEAST. She finally made Grandmaster in 2013, I actually met her. She came to my University chess club once, on her way to another tournament. Very nice and gracious lady. She was putting up complex endgame problems for us to solve, and then interacting with our top 2 players (who were 1900 and 2100 rated).
She did have a Russian Accent, but it wasn't too heavy. When I met her, she had just become a GM.
the jokes, the chess we come for all, "is garry among us" made me laugh my face off, love you levy.
that’s sus ngl 😂
There is one Suspicious GM among us
He admitted that he was looking through the MSN board where we were analyzing. The game itself was actually analyzed to be a draw, if it was continued instead of resigned.
Deadass thought Garry was just gonna fight the whole world
same ima be real i was ready to see gary throw hands with the entire planet
@@airballer2004 kinda disappointed that didn’t happen
Like streamers vs twitch chat but its a gm vs world chat lol
@@katarinaenright5404 i fully agree
@@brandongunner7664 not just chat I’m expecting to through hands
So it's basically Irina vs The World and her email system vs Gary.
"Irina Krush" not irene
@@hiraga1403 cheers
Lol
Yeah from what i can tell the only times the world didnt listen to what she said ended up being mistakes
People kept voting her moves because she was the highest rated GM on the "world" team. Her peak rating was 2500 compared to Kasparov who was over 2800 at the time. If there were more top players analyzing and advising moves then Kasparov likely would not have won.
Narrator: and it was on this position the fkn planet resigned
as a new player to chess, I'm only 5 minutes into the video and I've learned a million things already! Great analysis and complex gameplay = super fun. Keep up the great content!! :D
I followed this at the time and participated in some of the discussions about the next move. The most common comment made was, "The world is not a very good chess player."
I, too, was a participant. And yes, chess by committee was not so good.
I have to disagree with Levy, though. Irina did "bully" some of the play; I remember being passionately opposed to one of the moves; thinking we were missing an opportunity. But it was more a function that she was more invested in the game [and most of her moves were brilliant] and in the community than the other "advisors". In many respects, she was the first Social Media Influencer [Hot Take (tm)].
It was an influential game; and unique. Collaboration/kibitzing can be a very invigorating learning experience.
Garry is The God Father of Chess world
Hi Gotham/levy. In the past year i have studied a lot and gotten a lot of help out of your content and courses...about an hour ago i finally made it to 1700. I just wanted to thank you on behalf of all subscribers and fans.
We appreciate you and all the hard work you do for us all. Thank you!
1700 Rapid on Chess.com or?
Why does every rating that is higher than mine look so cool, damn
how have I not heard of Irina Krush before this, sounds like she helped massively to put up a fight against the chess goat, and as a teenager wow
probably say the same thing about any of the women champions from any country during that era of chess. the focus of the chess world was on Kasparov, not the women champions, the U.S. and soviet women included. were there U.S. women champions? oh yes. name one? hmmmmm. yep, have to look it up. look up the age of irina krush when she won her first US championship.
and she made the losing move (b4 instead of Qd3 or Qd5, both queen moves hold the draw)
She's a GM and 8 time US Woman's Chess Champion!
@@DipsAndPushups That's unfair to Irina since the team had already proven a draw with her suggestion of 51...Ka1 but the voting was tampered with and 51...b5 played instead.
That's why they lost. Listening to a woman in chess is a huge blunder.
Irena Krush at 17, almost drawed Gary Kasparov, she's insane
Magnus at 13
What’s her rating now?
@@adityavv96 2400
gary is among us
Wait, what? She was in highschool?! After you started talking about her, my mind definitely didn't portrait anyone near that age. Awesome. Amazing idea and brilliant game. Thank you for that coverage.
I was shocked when he said that, and being a high schooler myself, it kinda lifted my spirits.
she was 15 at the time too. absolutely incredible
actually, i just looked it up and 3/4 of the people analyzing the moves were in high school, or at least high school age. the fourth was 19 at the time of the game.
@@Ryan_Boyland interesting find, thank you for that.
@@Ryan_Boyland You mean the people 'suggesting' the moves.. there were hundreds of people analyzing the moves (I am happy to have been one of them! :D)
Other TH-cam channels: Lemme make 5 channels
Levy: Lemme make 5 videos a day
@@danes9778 i just reply : LOL
Man I love how Levy is passionate and enthusiastic about these games, it really makes you appreciate and savour every move.
He explains everything in such a beatuiful way that even a noob like me can understand such a high level game.
Keep doing what you're doing man, amazing content.
"Is Garry among us" among us drip song starts playing
*A mungus
@@locky244 * A Mangnus
A Magnus
* A magnet
*A moon goose
I'd love to see something like this happen these days. Maybe super-GMs vs stockfish(with time odds), get them all together in a conference hall and have them take a go at it over a day or two. If it was a somewhat limited pool made up only of those who had a career in chess, I think it could work without cheating.
They'll draw at best.
@@kunal1957 Not if they find brilliancies
magnus beat some guy using stockfish on time and I think he was winning positionally too
I’m really loving these historical game recaps
I remember this game being mentioned in the news in 1999. At the time I thought that 1000 rated players had equal voting power to all the other GMs so of *course* Kasparov won. Very interesting to see the analysis 22 years later.
Next match : Magnus Carlsen vs The Entire World, Chess Boxing Edition
Magnus Carlsen vs Anthony Joshua.
Chessboxing.
I was active for the world during this game. I must point out that at the time Irina Krush was 12 or 13 years old. Her coach at the time was GM Ron Henley. She openly talked of this on the website at the time. Over time Irina became the main influencer for the “world”. So basically this game almost came down to a postal game between Henley and Kasparov. During one move, Henley was preoccupied and couldn’t get a move to Krush in time, she mad a superficial suggestion, which the world followed, which turned out to be a blunder. So the world eventually threw away the draw. I just wanted to make sure GM Ron Henley finally gets his due credit.
Irina was absolutely 15 at the time. You can just look that up on wikipedia.
What move number was it if you happen to know
@@clayvision 21:39 queen to d3 or d5 can draw
@Douglas Legvold Your recollection of this game is faulty. Irina was 16. Ron Henley had less importance in the game than you suggest (aside from encouraging Irina to actually suggest her move ...Qe6). The delay in Irina's move suggestion had nothing to do with Henley, but rather was (as Levi stated) due to an email glitch when she sent her email very late at night and went to bed before it was actually sent (outbox lag could easily happen back then). Her 'superficial' suggestion was in fact the better move than the one played (although still ultimately would have lost). And ultimately the deciding factor is the vote stuffing that occurred on move 51. which allowed the inferior move 51...b5 to win over the line 51...Ka1 we had analyzed to a draw!
you just spouted... so much misinformation that i suspect it was deliberate.
15:17 Garry, the sussy imposter
fr
Lemme get this straight, this guy streams for hours every single day, and then makes not one, but TWO quality youtube videos EVERYDAY. Holy crap I respect his commitment, keep up the good work Levy.
I read Kasparov's book on this game; something I found slightly unsatisfying was that Kasparov *wasn't* playing unaided; he did have a team helping him with analysis.
So really it was Team Kasparov vs the World.
I remember when I first started getting into chess years ago, watching GM game analysis from the likes of Chess24 or Mato Jelic, and just being totally and utterly confused at the point of some of the moves, even after some explanation. Doesn't happen so much anymore, but this is the first time in a long time I've felt totally out of my depth watching a game analysis. What a beautiful game, Garry really was an absolute monster of a player.
your videos are so instructive, entertaining, almost precise, and smooth levy. how the heck do you memorize everything that you want to say? or do you make notes on what to say? you even say vote percentages accurately, you remember every move on the board, things they said about the game, history of some of the players and 99.9% of the time u dont even pause or edit the video or something. you're the best chess teacher vs the world.
Levy's commentary and analysis gets you glued to the screen and learning new things. Enjoyable for both chess & non-chess players alike.
And after being defeated, the world exclaimed: Tsschessumare! (dammit!)
Oh no, the man who says "quebrarle las patas al caballo" is here
Es una referencia a Perú?
Que haces aqui @Partidas Inmortales de Ajedrez !?!? Jaja ( soy sub :) )
JJAJAJAJJAJAJAJ
Tchesumare!!!
He finally changed his hoodie 😂🤣
😂
😂
I will *ruin* this chain
@UCnM-qXXNg2SZVvboQ2NKfdw nice content bro
Your passion and research are commendable. You’ve found an intersection of passion and skill and are sharing it with all of us. Thank you so much Gotham!
''Is Gary amongus?''😬😬⛽⛽
14:47 actually browser stockfish immediately recognizes kh1 as the best move (and it stays that way), but props to Gary for being stockfish before stockfish
This actually made me cry. Absolutely gorgeous video, great game and great stories behind it, great presentation. Good shit man. I never thought something chess related would ever make me cry (unless it is frustration from losing).
???
This man is a content machine
Hopefully he doesn't burn himself out
Imagine the day it was decided that such a match is gonna be played.
Person1-"Garry Kasparov ,its you against the world"
Garry- "It wouldnt be fair otherwise"
Such a badasss!!
This is the first ever video that I watched of this channel.
This man right here got me into chess.
With this exact video.
Life is so great sometimes.
Just whoa!
Y'know i would actually 100% be interested in tournys where teams of GMs play against each other
15:16 Levy sus moments
amogus
i hate you
There might be 1 Garry among us
Lmao I was literally about to comment that too :)
GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD
After playing a move that NO ONE else thought about for the SECOND TIME IN A ROW the world had only one thing in mind:
*Kinda sus. Is Garry among us?*
Kasparov was not the imposter
I just want to thank you for your content man! Even it's just some tiles and some pieces on the board your storytelling make the games feel even more alive than they are for any chess enthusiast. Great stuff, I was better entertained than I am in most movies!
3 years later and this is still my favorite chess video ever, Good job levy.
Thank you so much for the intense lore behind the match, that's the most exciting aspect; I had watched another video about this game, but its quality wasn't even closer to yours
Next: Garry Kasparov vs. The Entire Universe
Looks more like he's crushing the world rather than versing the world.
He's *Krush*ing the world
I played this video at half speed to make it easier to follow the logic of the moves. So I watched this for almost an hour and was completely absorbed. You make chess incredibly entertaining and educational!
I love coming back to this video. It’s so good, and feels oddly comforting
Sucks that this can’t be done with Magnus because of engines
Could it not be done on a smaller scale? Lock a load of GMs in a room with cameras and a projector, watch them arguing about different candidate moves while Magnus sips his water? I’d watch it
@@ianmendham6671 the rest of the world is much closer to the #1 level of skill now than they were back when this was done.
@@ianmendham6671 for 24 hours per move? Where a long game can take months? at the very most we can have like 5 gms play against him but it can’t be correspondence.
Magnus and a team of top 10 players should fight stockfish
On April 13th 36 years ago, Garry Chess - The inventor of Chess - Invented Chess. If Gotham Chess - son of Garry chess - does not make a video commemorating that beautiful day... We will revolt
lmaowut
The World Calls an Emergency Meeting: Gary Kasparov is among us as the imposter!
Did you really think this was funny
No bruh
my favorite video by you Levy! Thank you so much!
It'd be so funny / sad if after a day of computations Gary blunders a queen or smth, but this is probably only possible for me
For anyone who doesn't know Garry Kasparov is more commonly known as Garry Chess
Kasparov means Chess in Russian
he invented en passant
@@willmercurio9926 holy hell
1:56 for anyone interested, maróczy was a hungarian chess player and the cs makes an ts sound in hungarian so he is pronounced marótsy (i hope)
0 dislikes, like all GothamChess videos should be.
Garry : Playing the world can be difficult
World : but would you lose?
Garry : Na I'd Win
This reminds me of the recent r/place event, with communities coordinating and working together towards a common goal. Great video, just as good as advertised! I saw the clip of you saying that this is your favorite video of yours, and I think it's definitely up there.
Who is the world? This sounds like a cool story I've never heard of, you should dive deeper in the lore and history in videos this is awesome content! And great game btw!
It's as he stated, it was a public internet forum on MSN responsible for discussing and submitting the moves. Each side was given 24 hours per move.
Grandmaster Daniel King, currently running the PowerPlayChess youtube channel, was one of the top level GMs brought in to help the board, and co-wrote (with Kasparov) a book on this game in 2000 called "Kasparov Against the World: The Story of the Greatest Online Challenge".
was just needing content to watch, perfect upload timing
This man is a literal content machine
I love how bro just made a short about this vid from 3 years ago
I was following this game when it happened. As I recall, there was the possibility of entering a voter move more than once and subsequently some trollers nullified Irina's suggestion in that endgame by packing the questionable move which would have drawn. I don't remember which move it was. There was a lot of discussion condemning this at the time.
The move that was a draw was 51...Ka1 (Recommended by Irina and much of the team Including myself), instead the voting was stuffed to allow the inferior 51...b5 to win.
Garry : Kh1
The world : There is 1 impostor among us
This is the most insane chess game and chess story I've ever seen. It's sad that we can't get this kind of madness with modern-day chess. Amazing video
Kasparov pops his head out of a vent and checks the board.
Basically a highscooler being disturbed by GMs vs Gary
Love that you're so passionate about analyzing the game , I could feel it across the screen 😂
Content machine no cap
We need the current world super GMs vs Magnus that would be more of an epic crossover than the Avengers.
i(m) magnus has lossed to the current super gms without multiple of them, so what about a 1 hour each game, 20 i.m.s vs Magnus
The closest thing is Junior Team Judit Polgar vs Junior Team Vladimire Kramnik which is coming up. Which GM can recruit and train the strongest team?
@@MozzeeFootball
Kasparov has lost to GMs as well ur point?
wasnt kasparov way stronger than other gms tho? im not sure so correct me if im wrong. magnus isnt in good shape anyways and im pretty sure he would lose
@@MozzeeFootball I feel like Magnus could easily take multiple super GMs, so could any other super GM take on multiple other super GMs. Players are stronger than in the past, but close to a perfect play is possible by both parties. I feel like it'd be super close
The way levy described the whole game was 🔥🔥🔥
Geez imagine having a late submission and your excuse is "I spent the entire day analyzing a game against Garry Kasparov"
I like to imagine that when the world resigned, it was voted upon like any other move. 11% for queen here, 13% for queen there, 25% for king this way, and 51% fuck it we give up
This is phenomenal.
Gary: I got the whole world in my hands
"The computer is like: if only they knew" I will never forget this impression in Hikaru vs Magnus game
Man, you analyze the games like an interesting story, 20-30 minutes analyses without feeling boring is a big thing to me.
Thank you for covering this game, Gotham. I'd heard of it, but had never seen it. It has to go down as a highlight of a now lost era. Fascinating stuff.