I was shocked when everyone heard the “not guilty” verdict during the Trial of the Century. The case went from strange to beyond iconic thanks to Johnny Cochran and his famous line: “if it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”
@@iamdevilboy5976 100% innocent. He never should have been tried in the first place. According to Nicoles own mother, Nicole was still alive when OJ and his entourage were already gone at the airport for the Chicago flight. The prosecution sealed the phone records.
@@mistamycall And planted evidence. Lead detective pleaded the fifth. The prosecution sealed Nicole's phone records showing she was still alive talking to her mother while OJ and his entourage were already gone for the airport. They not only messed up the case but they also tried to railroad OJ.
Kim Kardashian is more famous than anyone from that trial, with the exception of maybe OJ. Sorry to say, but the Kardashians would’ve been famous one way or another, trial or no trial. She allegedly got her fame thru her dad, but she is much more famous than her father ever was.
Jurors sat through nine months of testimony and then promptly took all of four hours to award O.J. two free murders. What an insult to taxpayers and the victims' families.
@@DeTraviusBethea if I were on this jury I would have stuck with guilty until deadlock. I'm all for criminals walking free but this was just too blatantly obvious.
@@asmith8947 so you wasn't a juror. Cool. By your account they sat through 9 months of testimony and evidence for and against OJ AT TRIAL, in real time. Based on the math, and how the system works, they were the 12 most qualified people to make the decision. They came out 1 way, pretty fast. So for the most qualified people on the planet, it was pretty clear that the government didn't prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, so came with not guilty. Sounds like they did their job. How is that an insult?
It's not that simple... Taking the fifth, refusing to answer a question, does not make someone guilty of anything....Fuhrman said the idea of him transplanting a glove was "ridiculous".... That's what Fuhrman said.. Isn't it more relevant to ask how come OJ 'lost' or discarded ONE glove at the crime scene, and why didn't he retrieve it, knowing the blood on it would most likely incriminate him......??
@@johnnyjohnson2268to a normal person, invoking the fifth makes u sound like you’re guilty of something. Fuhrman made it seem like he really had planted evidence when all he had to say was no.
@@johnnyjohnson2268The perpetrator left indications that he tried looking for the hat and glove, evidenced by the bloody boot prints reaching the back gate then appeared to return to look for them. That corner of the yard was very dark. But more strange was the blood droplet trail which was tested and proven scientifically as (written by Donald Freed author of Killing Time) that the drops were planted b/c the splatter pattern and direction was neatly dropped at intervals from the height of 23inches unlike the first set and not from a natural body bleed from someone hurriedly getting away but from something like a medicine dropper judging from the uniformity and consistency of the splatter. They were only found in one direction leading away from the CS and not accompanied with the boot prints as it should’ve. That’s cop tampering!
@@johnnyjohnson2268Listen i 100% believe OJ did it, but it’s absolutely ridiculous that a LAPD officer plead the 5th when asked if he planted evidence instead of saying no. The prosecutors lost this case when they asked him to try on the glove and when Fuhrman was called to the stand.
A female black juror was just interviewed and asked why she voted to acquit, and she said because of the Rodney King trial! Then the journalist asked how many other jurors did the same thing and she said 90% of them!
Yes, the jurors were a bunch of racists, one gave the black panther salute and another said, "We have to take care of our own." Of course, the assumption is that they knew he was guilty too.
When I taught at a Police Academy, I used two different Crimes as examples of how NOT to handle evidence or secure a Crime Scene. One was the Jeffery MacDonald Case from the 1970's. The other was the O. J. Simpson Case..
No timeline No eyewitness . Suspect samples of EDTA contaminants And Simpson refused to testify Of course he did ! .The misunderstanding is that this didn't happen to anyone that"s passing wrongful judgement !
I’m curious as to why the DNA evidence isn’t as clear cut as they make it seem. I’m assuming it was t as advanced as it was now where you can clearly tie it to a person.
@@mider9996 Noted, genetic scientist Dr. James Watson, stated in 1991, that The Human Genenome Project, of genetic sciences has a 1% knowledge of understanding the genetic code. Dr. Watson won a nobel prize, in genetic discoveries, in 1956
@@mider9996the DNA evidence in this case was not valid because the defense proved due to improper police procedures that the jury could not trust the DNA evidence you as juror could not I hope find out that police draws Oj Simpson's blood at the police station and then hopped into a car with the suspects blood and took it to the crime scene after being in possession of it for over 3 hours clearly none of the people who's crying about his guilt should ever serve on a jury because I would never consider that evidence to be valid in any case because that's not proper procedures for crime investigation that procedure to set something up if you don't like it get better people to be police investigators then racist bias unprofessional unorthodox and clearly unqualified liars those who say he paid for his freedom what you're actually saying is that poor black white or any other race of person would have went to prison in a case where clearly the police did unprofessional improper and just down right nefarious behaviors but only money and the ability to point out criminal actions on the police saved him this case says more about bias of believing anything the prosecution says than a rich black man buying his freedom from a predominately black jury
@@mider9996 It's called a cover up cause they 100% can re re test it now but haven't. Furthermore if he was acquitted why do they never look for who did it
“Things About The O.J. Simpson Case That Still Don't Make Sense” Here’s one, He was Found INNOCENT ! Ok, He was Found Not Guilty. That Still Doesn't Make Sense
@@peytonnfl prosecution didn’t prove their case without reasonable doubt. Mark furhman pleading 5th when asked if he planted evidence would be reasonable doubt in any case. If he was found guilty he more than likely would have got off eventually with appeals.
Judge Ito could have reprimanded the jurors, set aside their idiotic verdict and put Simpson in prison where he belonged .He should have been disbarred.
So you think the police somehow planted Ron and Nicole's blood inside ojs bronco? And just how would they do that? You think they kept a vile of Ron and Nicole's blood in cold storage for the day they get killed together so when and if that day comes they can smear some in ojs car to frame him? Wake up
It was made all about race during the trial by the media. The prosecution made some mistakes, but the whole defense was based on "that cop was a racist, who planted all the evidence because OJ is black", even though it was not possible for one person to plant that much evidence that fit OJ that perfectly. Shame that the jury bought it and didn't weigh all the concrete evidence against OJ.
@@switcheroo1759 Plus, OJ's blood was dripped all the way down Nicole's sidewalk...it was his DNA. Beside it? Bloody size 12 Bruno Magli shoe prints..(the one's Nicole bought him) as he walked away from the bloody murder scene. Only 299 pairs sold in the US at that time, and there was a photo of OJ wearing them. Also, the same bloody shoe prints going from Nicole's body, to Ron Goldman's body. A mixture of OJ's blood, Ron and Nicole's found on OJ's bloody socks he wore that night. You're right, a slam-dunk case if there ever was one.
@@switcheroo1759Unfortunately the masterful character assassination of the officer who found evidence of the victims blood on OJ's property (glove/car/gate) was so eviscerating that it rendered the most damning evidence prosecution had by far as virtually inconsequential. I think it would be the same result under those circumstances no matter who was on the jury or where the trial was held
OJ didn’t call police about his whereabouts! A couple called police when they saw AC driving the Bronco on the freeway. With 2.34 MILLION subscribers, I would have thought you’d get facts straight.
@@archuleta1000 Both OJ and AL Cowlings owned white Broncos at the time. OJs Bronco was given to him by Hertz for making commercials for them. AC Cowlings later bought his white Bronco. At the time of the chase, OJs Bronco was in the Police Crime Lab being searched for forensic evidence. They were in Al Cowlings Bronco during the chase.
@@archuleta1000 they each had one, but that one was AC’s. I think OJ’s was probably taken as evidence. After the police have been notified and knew where he was, detective Tom Lange I believe it was called him on the car phone.
Kinda...He did call 911 but not about his whereabouts. A couple did tip the police off but OJ was gone by the time they responded so they had to trace his 911 calls.
@@JeanValjean875 Wait...... You said this "We're talking about a former NFL football player fighting a normal guy." Wait.. just wait........... *so because someone was a former NFL player, with their final game being 14 and a half years earler, that means that when they are in their late forties with chronic arthritis and move with a limp, they can completely overwhelm a guy the same size who is a fit martial artist more than twenty years younger??? And ALL BY HIMSELF???* And it also means that the former NFL player, *even though he's in his late forties with chronic arthritis, has a body made out of armor that he receives NO bruises or marks anywhere on his body despite the fact that Ron's autopsy showed he had defense wounds and was in a vicious fight to defend himself?* What drugs have you been taking, because it's obviously something worse than the cocaine that Nicole took and Ron Goldman sold?
@@JeanValjean875 Wait...... You said this "We're talking about a former NFL football player fighting a normal guy." Wait.. just wait........... *so because someone was a former NFL player, with their final game being 14 and a half years earler, that means that when they are in their late forties with chronic arthritis and move with a limp, they can completely overwhelm a guy the same size who is a fit martial artist more than twenty years younger??? And ALL BY HIMSELF???* And it also means that the former NFL player, *even though he's in his late forties with chronic arthritis, has a body made out of armor that he receives NO bruises or marks anywhere on his body despite the fact that Ron's autopsy showed he had defense wounds and was in a vicious fight to defend himself?* What drugs have you been taking, because it's obviously something worse than the cocaine that Nicole took and Ron Goldman sold?
Its absolutely remarkable how anytime a black man is found guilty, he is guilty according to the court of law. However, if a black man is found innocent he is guilty found guilty according to the streets. When can a black man be innocent? Or is he always guilty when in the judicial system?
Lol yeah ok. A carrot stick could have defended oj and that jury would still acquitted him. That being said F Lee Bailey was the true star. Mindfucking the prosecution into asking for oj to put on the gloves and then setting Furman up then mowing him over. Cochran didn't really do anything but come up with a stupid rhyme.
The incompetent detectives that splashed blood on OJ car to taint the crime scene didn't help either.they bungled finding enough real evidence, so they faked it..
@@Vinny.X I can’t disagree with this statement. If the prosecution had performed competently, the outcome could have very well been the same. The jurors were predisposed to find not guilty due to recent racial events and injustices. We’ll never know though because of the prosecution. The Goldman and Brown families were robbed of a criminal conviction.
They seem to have gotten basic facts completely wrong. OJ didn’t call police and tell them his whereabouts at all! You’d think with over 2 million subscribers, they’d at least make an effort.
Brentwood is a neighborhood of the City of Los Angeles. Santa Monica is a separate city in Los Angeles County. There is no Santa Monica County, at least not in California.
Oj had the history of abuse and Nicole was afraid he would kill her and she was right Ron Goldman was sadly in the wrong place at the wrong time i feel truly sorry for the kids just horrible for them
Nicole and Ron Goldman were promiscuous and engulfed in a cocaine lifestyle. Don’t paint them as some sort of angels. Two of Goldmans friends were murdered in similar fashion, both drug related.
It came out that Nicole tried to leave OJ several times but her family discouraged her as he bought them all sorts of gifts and paid for her sister's college. Doesn't excuse what he did but they already knew about his history and might have avoided her murder had they not convinced her to stay.
We all know what happened. He even had a book published called if I DID IT, explained how the murder "might have been committed" on chat shows and made the most awful jokes about his deceased ex-wife. Not the behaviour of someone wrongly accused of murder. Look at the face of Robert Kardashian who was sideshowed into this circus, when the verdict was delivered. Then there is the juror who admitted that this verdict was in retaliation to the Rodney King case. If He Did It? Of course he did. He was a violent, abusive ex-partner who came for revenge. A tale as old as time. RIP Nicole and Ron.
And I love all the comments from the black community about "respecting" the verdict....lol.....not many black people "respected" the acquittal verdict for the officers in the Rodney King case....such hypocrites .....didn't they burn L.A. to the ground ?!? So much for "respect "....
@@victoriavancartier7379 Except there was clear video evidence in Rodney King. There was reasonable doubt all over the OJ Simpson trial, including the lead detective who pleaded the fifth for planting evidence. "bur L.A. to the ground?" what " L.A." are you talking about?
First, it's "too." Second, there was overwhelming inculpatory forensic evidence. Third, anyone who watched post-trial interviews with jurors like Carrie Bess know that this was a clear case of nullification, or, in Bess's words, "payback for Rodney King." Apparently, some people think two wrongs make a right.
@@grouchomarxist666 No, there was reasonable doubt. My ultra conservative lawyer friend said if he had been on the jury (and he was in his forties at the time of the case) he would have said the prosecution did NOT prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. In capital cases this was required. The fact that O.J. beat and abused his wife is not proof of a murder; the timeline was off; there was evidence of blood from a test tube inside a sock; the LA police was known to be corrupt, racist and violent, and this was exposed during the trial, so that the possibility of planted evidence and lying was reliable.
@@roseannrook7897 First, it doesn't matter that your conservative friend is a lawyer; juries weigh evidence, lawyers simply present it. Your friend has no special qualification. Second, the DA's office made mistakes and yes, LAPD is racist and corrupt, but those things can be true at the same time O.J. Simpson slew two people, and there was a blood trail from the crime scene to Simpson's house and car.
@@kilduce4423 Really, it was basically in part, “payback” for the acquittal of the officers involved in the beating of Rodney that had some indirect influence in the acquittal of OJ. This was a time when racial inequality in the justice system was becoming very clear, and African Americans were getting tired of it, and the OJ Simpson case came as a perfect platform or focus point for the folks to fight back and create awareness in the inequalities they were facing.
“How does does a wookie, an 8 foot tall wookie, live on a planet with a bunch of 3 foot tall ewoks?? That DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!” ~The Chewbacca Defense by Johnny Cochran via South Park 😂🤣😂
I watched the trial when I was a kid. It honestly was circus. Look at all the people that got famous from it. That's all they cared about. The word sidebar was said so many time, it was stupid, and look what happened. A murderer went free.
@@RickGamesNow The rubber glove was worn under it so not to contaminate it. Even if he hadn't worn a rubber glove, it was still too small. The glove was a size L and OJ's hands were 2XL size. They were two sizes too small for OJ. If it does not fit you must acquit. Oh year....the lead detective, who "found" the gloves as well as the person who "found" the rest of the "mountain of evidence" pleaded the fifth for planting evidence. OJ Simpson was 100% innocent. Period.
Mark Furman supposedly finding the bloody glove created reasonable doubt for many. And we all know that law enforcement never plant evidence--Right!!!!
LOL!! If there was no "surface" reason for Fuhrman to plant the glove, the WHY on earth would he plead the fifth to THAT question??? Those acts of repeatedly taking the 5th, ALONE almost single-handedly killed the entire Prosecution's case!!
I still can't believe what an idiot Marcia Clark was regarding the bloody gloves! OK - so you know the brand and size of the gloves booked into evidence. So you bring in to court the president or the CEO of the glove manufacturer, have him/her bring in a brand new pair of gloves (never worn) that are the exact brand, color and size of the gloves booked into evidence. Then you have OJ Simpson try on the new pair of gloves with his bare hands (opposed to wearing latex gloves as he did in court to try on the bloody gloves) and if the gloves fit...well you know.
@@jonathanspivak9716 no. Someone from the glove company was a witness and he tried on a new pair. That part wasn’t played on and the news so in ur limited reality, it didn’t happen.
@@KingMercury Sounds like something you dreamed! Please share with the class your source of information because the entire trial was televised. I'm serious please tell your source (ie website conspiracy theory link) because all the evidence was presented on TV, there was no part of the trial where the cameras were shut off. OJ Simpson ONLY tried on the bloody gloves, which were those gloves that were booked into evidence that got shrunk due to being blood soaked! Do you live in a state with winter weather? If you do and have bought leather gloves, you know after leather gloves are exposed to snow and water soaks in, your gloves get tighter. After thoroughly using my leather gloves during the winter, I have to buy a new pair prior to the next winter because the old pair is uncomfortably tight.
Exactly, I remember cringing when they handed them to OJ to put on because I know leather shrinks when wet, couldn't understand why they ignored that very important fact.
The prosecutors should have bought the same gloves and had OJ try on the new gloves that were not exposed to moisture. Then he also would not have needed to wear the latex/vinyl gloves to protect the bloody gloves. One other point to make - have you ever tried to get a child to put on winter gloves they don’t want to wear? They will contort their hands so the glove “doesn’t “ fit.
Goldman should have just handed OJ. the eyeglasses and left, instead of going into a stance and trying to be the karate kid, especially with one of the most coordinated people in the world. According to Vince Gironda, OJ. was the most coordinated person in the world, period.
@christerry1773 Didn't the white jurors let J.W. Milam and Roy Bryant go free because they were white? They killed Emmett Till in 1955, a black teenager. B4 u excoriate oj for his sins u might want to check your kinfolks sins
No he was found not guilty because the blood that was found at the scene had EDTA in it. Which means it came from a vile after OJ volunteered to give them his blood samples. They were riding around with his DNA ffs 😭
The domestic abuser (he pleaded no contest, this is undisputed) was found not guilty of murder because he was rich enough to hire a bunch of good lawyers that exposed a cop for being a racist and Nazi merch collector. No wonder it made for such good TV!
Find the recordings of OJ talking to Detective Tom Lange during the Bronco chase. Total talk of a guilty person. OJ saying that he was a bad person and did not deserve to live.
😮 Tom was out of line to try to stop that suicide. I don't care about the law of man, if he truly loved his wife with a raging furious passion strong enough to do that bloody deed, he would want to kill his own self afterwards. (Othello... nobody ever heard of that famous play?) The black Moor kills Desdemona, then himself. Bas. Seems silly to intervene one way or the other , unless God is involved in the personal decision of the individual. God can say "your body is mine, I created it, not you and I want you to stop trying to be God by taking your life."
@@deandreray3500I disagree, lots of us cared about Rodney King and were glad when the officers who viciously and unjustly beat him were tried and convicted of civil rights violations. Lots of us also cared when Ron and Nicole were brutally murdered by OJ, and didn’t relate it all to race or Rodney King. OJ was just a violent and jealous narcissist who couldn’t control his rage. It should have never been connected to the Rodney King case.
@@anthonydonofrio3869exactly right no one should get away with committing crimes definitely get punished for it two innocent victims were brutally murdered and the person killer got away with it
The prosecution looked through every trash can there and even dump site. The guy saw oj throw away a small bag, not even something that clothes would fit in. Prosecution didn't call him because this was an empty path for them.
The blood on the sock had EDTA in the blood drops, and the blood went through one side of the socks and transferred to the other side of the sock. This could not happen if a foot and ankle were in the sock. The droplets were more likely dropped on the socks from a dropper.
Vincent Bugliosi, who put the Manson family behind bars, said the O. J.'s legal team was not even good, but the prosecutors did such a bad job of trying him.
What an idiot. They earned every dime they made. They played the prosecution like a fiddle. They were so good that had it been an all white jury (or the very least a 100% unbiased jury) he still may have been found not guilty. Ole Vincent bogblahblah is clearly green with envy.
I still believe he didn't kill them that detective went straight to that glove as if he knew it was there I believe Nichole o r her boy friend owed some real big wheeler or that boy was involved with some organization. Like Whitney houston! I remember that Columbian neck tie talk a simple black man ain't gonna take the time to pull someone tongue out so it will hang out and you will have to be well experienced to do that
@@cli4g67graS racist how? in those bombshell 2 hour tapes, he said the N word only twice. He was playing a character for a screenwriter who was writing a fictional movie about cops
@@cli4g67graS because Cochran made it about race when it really wasn't. The jury didn't even care about the evidence. It was restorative justice, payback for Rodney King.
Why does everybody keep claiming they didn't fit? They were a little tight, because they had shrunk a bit from all the blood that had dried on them, but they did fit over his hands. Even with all of Simpson 's false pantomiming and gesticulations they fit.
OJ was as innocent as warm apple pie baby! OJ is the real victim!!! Dirty cops, dirty tactics, bad lawyers,The real killer is still out there, it’s as simple as that Jack, in like Flin Tim.
OJ Simpson also had arthritis that a lot of people didn't know about.. when the trial was on its way Robert Shapiro told OJ to stop taking his arthritis medicine it would make his hands bloated a little bit
2 innocent people were slaughtered and the guy who did it got away with it. The jury should be disgusted with themselves. Their level of perception and seemingly the majority of the USA perception of that time had no place on a jury let alone a court room. He walked free
Eye witness says they saw OJ at LAX airport the night of the murders with a suspicious bag that he threw away at the airport trashcan. Police didn’t follow up on it in time, but realistically they only had about 2-3 days to recover it before it went to a land fill and the eye witness took a little long
@@darkhorse9472 There was an extra UNIDENTIFIED set of footprints through the blood and OBVIOUSLY they werent OJ's or any cop, CSI, ME, etc.. they cancelled out everyone who worked the scene!
That was before the trial a year later in 1995. In 1994, OJ was in a bronco chase so that everyone view it for the world to see. If you watched O.J. Made In America: there were a few people in the streets cheering for him.
@@KadeemG61 So you think the chase was staged to build public support for Simpson? If you were devastated by the loss of your ex wife and concerned about the well being of your children you wouldn't be suicidal. For OJ it was always about OJ.
OJ also had his passport and $10,000 in cash you really think he was going to commit suicide to begin with hell no that was the second plan he was leaving the country
I love how they say OJ just forgot his one glove "fell off" at the scene and just left it there, but then he ran and hid the clothes/shoes/knife (so he was naked?) but forgot to include the other glove with the clothes/shoes/knife....and then just dropped that other glove at his house??????
@@mikedexheimer1481 so according to you, OJ had time to stick around to mutilate the bodies the same way as what happened to rons boss, yet he didn't have time to pick the glove up and take it with him? Also, OJ had time to run somewhere, hide the clothes and the knife (so he's now butt naked), and so it so well that out of nowhere thirty years none of it was ever found, then bathe himself.....yet he keeps the other glove...and brings it to his house and jist drops it outside his house at his air conditioner????
@@mikedexheimer1481you are absolutely right he left it there so he ran away from the murders it clearly fit his hands his doctor told him to stop taking his arthritis meds made his hands swell
Nichols mother said she was on the phone with nicole at the exact supposed times of the murders. A judge sealed the phone records for 75 years . POOR VIDEO
The FACT that OJ didn’t even ask if the kids were safe or how Nicole died when police told him she had been killed tells you all you need to know about OJ’s guilt or innocence.
How anyone still thinks he didn't do it beyond me. Nobody else had a reason to do it. He alone has abused Nicole multiple times in the past, he alone tried to control her and when he no longer could he ended her life and the life of that poor young man Ron.
The butler did it in the lounge with the candlestick… no… the maid did it in the kitchen with the lead pipe… no… OJ did it with the knife and like any other femicide, « if I can’t have you no one else can « RIP Nicole & Ron
This is simply another case where we will never really know what happened, just like the Kennedy assassination! Whether you believe he did it or not.....we will never know!
This is decisive for me: to frame OJ by planting evidence (as the jury found), the police would have to know the most famous guy in LA would have no alibi.
@@Chck314I disagree. Evidence places him at the crime scene. But not overwhelming evidence that he did it. I believe he was an accomplice but not the murder.
He did have a alibi. He went to Chicago. They were trying to say that OJ did everything within a 25 minute time frame. He had time to clean himself up get rid of evidence and still catch a flight out of LAX. All within 25 minutes? You’d have to be the Flash or something to do all that.
@@kilduce4423 Brett Cantor - Hollywood An exact murder of Nicole Brown- Ron Goldman An exact investigation into cocaine distribution Involving the murder of Michael Nigg Mezzaluna Aspen An exact investigation in the murders of Nicole Simpson/ Goldman Mezzaluna Brentwood
OJ guilty 1) he had a cut on his finger 2)he kept that glove on his hand so the blood wouldn’t go all over the place when he drove home that’s why they found the glove on his property. 3) he was late getting back home when he saw the limo already waiting in front of his house that’s why he parked on the street instead of his driveway and climbed over the fence and went thru his backyard dropping the glove before he got in the back of house. 4 ) the glove did fit he just made it look like it didn’t by keeping his fingers spread out but it did fit.
I had heard he stopped taking his arthritis meds so his hands were swollen. I also thought leather gloves that get wet tend to shrink, so of course it wouldn't fit.
@@mikelowrey__ Would the nation have exploded in race riots? The jury did the right thing. They saved dozens, if not thousands of people that would have been killed in the ensuing race riots.
@@mikelowrey__that’s not true. if that’s the case innocent people wouldn’t be “found guilty.” ojs lawyers were just better. he killed that woman and man for sure.
@@DramatikChangezso, by your logic…HE, OJ left the airport, got to the scene and killed not one, but two people…got rid of the knife and cleaned himself up all in a matter of 20 minutes?! Ron was a black belt in karate and half OJ’s age, but OJ killed him and Nicole at the same time and managed to get away with no scratches, scrapes or injuries?! Plus Ron fought back, but didn’t have OJ’s dna under his nails! You people clearly rode the short yellow bus to school everyday!
Mark Furman was racist. Most people including the jury saw this as a case of "black justice" . But its an example of " rich justice". O.J. lived amongst and associated with rich white people. Whether he committed murder or not he was found not guilty because he could afford the best lawyers.
Yeah ok. That's why a black juror said "we take care of our own" and another admitted it was retaliation for Rodney king. If they truly were weighing the evidence then how did they come to a verdict s quickly? Cause they didn't talk about the evidence. They all knew they were voting not guilty from the jump.
Jill Shively testified that she saw OJ at 10:50. Prosecution need OJ home by 10:40 to be heard by Kato. That's why they didn't have her testify. The lack of honesty about this case is mind boggling.
@@naithngr81-jh2bb The prosecution put Fuhrman on the stand and they KNEW he was a racist, crooked cop. You think they'd hide from Shively? She was bad for their timeline. They tried to get her to say she was there earlier but she wouldn't.
Her testimony did not fit their timeline. And the guy who claimed he saw OJ disposing a gym bag in the trash at the airport was debunked by airport video surveillance footage. Neither of these “witnesses” would have helped the prosecution, and would have given the defense more ammunition by pointing out how some people just want that 15 minutes of fame. In addition, the theory that OJ had stripped out of his bloody clothes to prevent getting the interior of the bronco soaked with blood would mean that he definitely would not be trying to draw attention to himself by doing road rage. Miss Shively also claimed she has made a phone call to the non emergency police number that night to report it, but police records show she did not.
No that's not the reason she didn't testify. The reason was that she was lying. Listen to her testimony in the grand jury, she only called police on Tuesday not Monday morning like she says, and LA police only talked to her on Wednesday, this is all on file with the LA POLICE 😊
@@mindyjones3770 exactly what I said (regarding the airport security video). How ridiculous of a claim by the prosecution and a "witness". I'm certain the first thing the LAPD did was review airport surveillance, which would have every angle of every square inch of LAX covered. It wouldn't take long, either, as they only need to look at the time between 11;15pm and 11:45pm, and a limo and OJ himself would not be difficult to identify in the video. What gets lost in all of this is that 2 people were murdered.
Charlie Ehrlich ? Well, Ehrlich isn't connected to the 1993 murder of Brett Cantor But, Nicole Brown Simpson & Ron Goldman are connected to knowing who killed Brett Cantor, with the same style of knife in the same manor
the narrator has to know the reason the prosecution didn’t use Jill Shively or whatever is because she was proven to have lied about seeing OJ after the murder & they uncovered her past of ripping people off, not just because she sold her story also, gotta know it was a ghostwriter who wrote If I Did It…stupid to have his name attached at all, but still he didn’t truly write it (maybe verbalized some points tho lol)
The narratives , are public opinions, not legal facts! This began, with handcuffs, under a protest of being questioned It ends, with entering the Bronco, & Rockingham estate without a warrant . Now that we know that O.J Simpson wasn't in danger let's arrest him for murder
Yea idk. This happened when I was really young and I always thought he was 💯 guilty but idk anymore. The media really hyped this up and made him look really bad but there’s things that don’t make sense. Fuhrman pleading the 5th on whether he planted evidence is wild and then Ron Goldman having bruises on his hands like he hit someone and OJ not having wounds consistent with that. I’m not saying he’s innocent, alls I’m saying is I’m not 💯 sure anymore🤷♂️
Im still waiting on someone to explain how EDTA blood preservatives showed up in a few blood spots and not others, then the socks where blood went from one side through his ankle and out the other side 🤔 if im on a jury and the state is asking me to basically take someone's life because in effect thats what ill be doing if i find someone guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder they are definitely going to have to explain that to me
It was never explained by either side who’s car was parked in OJ driveway when the Limo picked him up. His daughter returned later that night and parked there. The only thing the jury asked to be read back was testimony about that car. So someone else was at least at the house that night and it has never been explained who it was or what they did that night.
OJ should have an autopsy checking for CTE. Massive head trauma that often causes violent and erratic behavior, frequently seen the autopsies of sports players, notably Football and Boxing.
@@andyscott5277 ok. I'm sorry if it seemed like I was accusing you of it. You just never know when you communicate online. But you are absolutely right. His anger issues could have been caused by CTE. Or at least a contributing factor.
he was found not guilty because jurors do not have to take an IQ test. Interviews with some of those people, are available and, it is unforgettable to hear them talk
Exactly. Some of those people didn't even know what DNA is. Many of them had hardly even finished high school. And this is not my opinion. One of the jurors interviewed for the Academy Award-winning documentary "O.J.: Made in America" said that he didn't know what DNA was
The police planted evidence (for no reason) and the lead investigator plead the 5th to whether he planted evidence or not. The prosecution/ police lost the case
@Yumiiyumi- why would he plant evidence? the man killed 2 people and he is cut and has bruises. There was a history of physical violence. The judge knew about a conversation in jail where the man accepted to a visitor that he did it. The judge didn't allow that in court, but the judge knew this info.
@@salj.5459 Also not to mention a jury member came out saying 90 percent of them believed he was guilty but only didn't convict to get back at the system. That's very telling.
@@imjustanameless That was one person's opinion of the event. There was enough reason to acquit because the prosecution did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Thanks mostly to Mark Fuhrman
“Ron and Nicole were physically dead and it’s almost like they killed me, who I was was attacked and murdered also” OJ Simpson Where is your compassion for OJ people?
4:59 IMMEDIATE DOWNVOTE. The detective didn’t say those things himself, he was reading lines written by a writer for a role. It was an audition tape. It was also recorded like eight years earlier and Mark Furman had a long and celebrated career as an inner city cop before the trial. Not to mention that at the time of the murders, OJ was regarded as one of the most beloved celebrities in LA by the police because he attended police fundraiser parties. OJ brought in thousands for the LAPD. If the police was going to frame, they would frame Mark Furman before they ever thought about losing the star power and money OJ brought them. You can even see it in the first interrogation tape with detectives, OJ was given super soft ball questions despite being covered in cuts and bruises. They loved The Juice! They couldn’t believe he did it until they found overwhelming amounts of his DNA on the scene.
Mark Furman requested early retirement from the LAPD because he stated his hatred for black people made it impossible for him to do his job. This was way before the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. The prosecutors knew about this and yet they still chose to put him on the witness stand when it wasn't necessary to do so.
Umm....No! She was interviewing him about his real experiences with LAPD for a screenplay she was planning on writing. Also, OJ wasn't covered in cuts & bruises. He had one cut. Tell me you don't know anything about the evidence in this case without telling me you don't know anything about the evidence in this case!
@@kelvinbarber1765 How did he do it and not be completely 100% saturated in blood from head to toe and only allegedly leave microscopic teency weency specs of blood? Nicole was almost decapitated so blood wouldve been spraying all over immediately until her heart stopped pumping, then it wouldve just been seeping out, heavily though! Rolling around with Ron while stabbing him wouldve also soaked the perp in blood!
To the ignorant ppl i agree with this take, ppl who actually researched the case cam not logically think he actually did it. No marks on ojs body , dna under her nails didn't match oj , ron had defense wounds on his hands so he was hitting someone, missing blood that was taken from ojs was missing, police admitted they took his blood home and back to the crime scene, how you and ppl like you seem to leave that out of your videos is very telling to me. The truth is he got a fair trial and was rightfully found not guilty.
@@christopherhazell420 To the ignorant ppl i agree with this take, ppl who actually researched the case cam not logically think he actually did it. No marks on ojs body , dna under her nails didn't match oj , ron had defense wounds on his hands so he was hitting someone, missing blood that was taken from ojs was missing, police admitted they took his blood home and back to the crime scene, how you and ppl like you seem to leave that out of your videos is very telling to me. The truth is he got a fair trial and was rightfully found not guilty.
@@christopherhazell420. The serial killer Glen Rogers. He was in town at the time, handyman at Nicole’s, admitted to the crime, killed others with a knife, took a souvenir from Nicole and gave it to his mother. Two of his siblings outed him.
![วันเกิดเธอ (TO YOU) - PHUWIN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_ROx1Bj3T0Y/mqdefault.jpg)
What were your thoughts on the O.J. Simpson case?
100% guilty
The prosecution and crime scene investigation fumbled the ball!
I was shocked when everyone heard the “not guilty” verdict during the Trial of the Century. The case went from strange to beyond iconic thanks to Johnny Cochran and his famous line: “if it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”
@@iamdevilboy5976 100% innocent. He never should have been tried in the first place. According to Nicoles own mother, Nicole was still alive when OJ and his entourage were already gone at the airport for the Chicago flight. The prosecution sealed the phone records.
@@mistamycall And planted evidence. Lead detective pleaded the fifth. The prosecution sealed Nicole's phone records showing she was still alive talking to her mother while OJ and his entourage were already gone for the airport. They not only messed up the case but they also tried to railroad OJ.
Ford : “still the greatest marketing stunt ever”
Ford stopped making Broncos after this.
Then why was the bronco discontinued in 96? I think you meant chevy.
@@bradsanders407 Ford stopped making the Bronco after 96 because they wanted to focus on the then new Expedition.
Didn't they just rename the Bronco to the Escape? That would be hilarious.
They discontinued the Bronco for 24 years.
You knew the trial was going to be wacky when you had a white surfer dude named Kato, and a Japanese judge named Lance!
Lance Ito
😂😂😂😂
lol
Brian "Kato" Kaelin
😂wow.
what really pisses me off about OJ is if not for him murdering Nicole Brown , we would never have had The Kardashians.
Funny, I said the same thing last night!
An even greater crime some might say.
Y’all crazy 😂
Kim Kardashian is more famous than anyone from that trial, with the exception of maybe OJ. Sorry to say, but the Kardashians would’ve been famous one way or another, trial or no trial. She allegedly got her fame thru her dad, but she is much more famous than her father ever was.
@@arekhodge40 You just don’t get it do you!
Jurors sat through nine months of testimony and then promptly took all of four hours to award O.J. two free murders. What an insult to taxpayers and the victims' families.
They understood the assignment, they probably deliberated on it even less time than the 4 hours back there
a cop wouldn't say under oath that he didn't plant evidence. A cop who had already perjurred himself, couldn't say he didn't plant evidence...
Were you a juror?
@@DeTraviusBethea if I were on this jury I would have stuck with guilty until deadlock. I'm all for criminals walking free but this was just too blatantly obvious.
@@asmith8947 so you wasn't a juror. Cool. By your account they sat through 9 months of testimony and evidence for and against OJ AT TRIAL, in real time. Based on the math, and how the system works, they were the 12 most qualified people to make the decision. They came out 1 way, pretty fast. So for the most qualified people on the planet, it was pretty clear that the government didn't prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, so came with not guilty. Sounds like they did their job. How is that an insult?
They asked oj if he did it , he says no! They asked mark Furman if he did it. ......he doesn't want to answer. Its really that simple
It's not that simple... Taking the fifth, refusing to answer a question, does not make someone guilty of anything....Fuhrman said the idea of him transplanting a glove was "ridiculous".... That's what Fuhrman said.. Isn't it more relevant to ask how come OJ 'lost' or discarded ONE glove at the crime scene, and why didn't he retrieve it, knowing the blood on it would most likely incriminate him......??
@@johnnyjohnson2268to a normal person, invoking the fifth makes u sound like you’re guilty of something. Fuhrman made it seem like he really had planted evidence when all he had to say was no.
@@johnnyjohnson2268The perpetrator left indications that he tried looking for the hat and glove, evidenced by the bloody boot prints reaching the back gate then appeared to return to look for them. That corner of the yard was very dark. But more strange was the blood droplet trail which was tested and proven scientifically as (written by Donald Freed author of Killing Time) that the drops were planted b/c the splatter pattern and direction was neatly dropped at intervals from the height of 23inches unlike the first set and not from a natural body bleed from someone hurriedly getting away but from something like a medicine dropper judging from the uniformity and consistency of the splatter. They were only found in one direction leading away from the CS and not accompanied with the boot prints as it should’ve. That’s cop tampering!
@@johnnyjohnson2268Listen i 100% believe OJ did it, but it’s absolutely ridiculous that a LAPD officer plead the 5th when asked if he planted evidence instead of saying no. The prosecutors lost this case when they asked him to try on the glove and when Fuhrman was called to the stand.
Very good point.
After months of looking for a jury full of people who had never heard of OJ Simpson, they finally found 12 of his old college professors.
huh? The jury was mainly uneducated black people who couldn't grasp that DNA evidence was infallible.
😂😂😂
Good one. OJ clearly didnt do it though
@@ericwilliams1023 haha now THAT is funny
@@cjbudd when you give some actual evidence I can be swayed
Are you insinuating (gasp) that he didn't attend a lot of classes while playing football at USC??
A female black juror was just interviewed and asked why she voted to acquit, and she said because of the Rodney King trial! Then the journalist asked how many other jurors did the same thing and she said 90% of them!
That was pretty clear at the time, unfortunately.
OJ was found not guilty because Mark Fuhrman was proven to be racist and plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. Now cope
Yes, the jurors were a bunch of racists, one gave the black panther salute and another said, "We have to take care of our own." Of course, the assumption is that they knew he was guilty too.
@JMelissaMc 😂 yeah coming from you whites is funny. You racist just wanted another black man go down
No the police that beat a black man was racist
When I taught at a Police Academy, I used two different Crimes as examples of how NOT to handle evidence or secure a Crime Scene. One was the Jeffery MacDonald Case from the 1970's.
The other was the O. J. Simpson Case..
No timeline
No eyewitness .
Suspect samples of EDTA contaminants
And Simpson refused to testify
Of course he did !
.The
misunderstanding is that this didn't happen to anyone that"s passing wrongful judgement !
I’m curious as to why the DNA evidence isn’t as clear cut as they make it seem. I’m assuming it was t as advanced as it was now where you can clearly tie it to a person.
@@mider9996
Noted, genetic scientist
Dr. James Watson, stated in 1991, that
The Human Genenome
Project, of genetic sciences has a 1% knowledge of understanding the genetic code.
Dr. Watson won a nobel prize, in genetic discoveries, in 1956
@@mider9996the DNA evidence in this case was not valid because the defense proved due to improper police procedures that the jury could not trust the DNA evidence you as juror could not I hope find out that police draws Oj Simpson's blood at the police station and then hopped into a car with the suspects blood and took it to the crime scene after being in possession of it for over 3 hours clearly none of the people who's crying about his guilt should ever serve on a jury because I would never consider that evidence to be valid in any case because that's not proper procedures for crime investigation that procedure to set something up if you don't like it get better people to be police investigators then racist bias unprofessional unorthodox and clearly unqualified liars those who say he paid for his freedom what you're actually saying is that poor black white or any other race of person would have went to prison in a case where clearly the police did unprofessional improper and just down right nefarious behaviors but only money and the ability to point out criminal actions on the police saved him this case says more about bias of believing anything the prosecution says than a rich black man buying his freedom from a predominately black jury
@@mider9996 It's called a cover up cause they 100% can re re test it now but haven't. Furthermore if he was acquitted why do they never look for who did it
“Things About The O.J. Simpson Case That Still Don't Make Sense”
Here’s one, He was Found INNOCENT !
Ok, He was Found Not Guilty.
That Still Doesn't Make Sense
Cry to racist Mark Fuhrman who pleaded the fifth
He wasn’t found innocent. He was found not guilty. Big difference.
@@KingMercurywdym
Huh? Nobody is adjudicated innocent - go back to school. It’s guilty or not guilty and the all have different meanings. Words matter
@@peytonnfl prosecution didn’t prove their case without reasonable doubt. Mark furhman pleading 5th when asked if he planted evidence would be reasonable doubt in any case. If he was found guilty he more than likely would have got off eventually with appeals.
The judge OJ's facing now won't care if the glove doesn't fit!
A judge we all must face.
You're passing judgement on God by believing that only your opinion matters
Judge Ito could have reprimanded the jurors, set aside their idiotic verdict and put Simpson in prison where he belonged .He should have been disbarred.
@@asmith8947
No!
Disbarred for NOt declaring a mistrial
dosent he forgive everyone?or is that just another myth!
Is it common to wear gloves in June? In Southern California?
Also would anyone wear a wool skully cap in LA in June??
He was gardening
@@shaunabarry-scott6192I know right it plain weird because who wears that in summer time
I think there was reasonable doubt in the prosecutions case, it doesn't mean i think he was innocent, they just didn't prove their case
So you think the police somehow planted Ron and Nicole's blood inside ojs bronco? And just how would they do that? You think they kept a vile of Ron and Nicole's blood in cold storage for the day they get killed together so when and if that day comes they can smear some in ojs car to frame him? Wake up
It was made all about race during the trial by the media. The prosecution made some mistakes, but the whole defense was based on "that cop was a racist, who planted all the evidence because OJ is black", even though it was not possible for one person to plant that much evidence that fit OJ that perfectly. Shame that the jury bought it and didn't weigh all the concrete evidence against OJ.
They found a mixture of his ,Nicole and ronalds blood in his vehicle .a toddler could have prosecuted that case under normal circumstances
@@switcheroo1759
Plus, OJ's blood was dripped all the way down Nicole's sidewalk...it was his DNA. Beside it? Bloody size 12 Bruno Magli shoe prints..(the one's Nicole bought him) as he walked away from the bloody murder scene. Only 299 pairs sold in the US at that time, and there was a photo of OJ wearing them. Also, the same bloody shoe prints going from Nicole's body, to Ron Goldman's body.
A mixture of OJ's blood, Ron and Nicole's found on OJ's bloody socks he wore that night.
You're right, a slam-dunk case if there ever was one.
@@switcheroo1759Unfortunately the masterful character assassination of the officer who found evidence of the victims blood on OJ's property (glove/car/gate) was so eviscerating that it rendered the most damning evidence prosecution had by far as virtually inconsequential. I think it would be the same result under those circumstances no matter who was on the jury or where the trial was held
Easiest reasonable doubt court case in history. When your lead detective commits perjury on the stand, there is no better reasonable doubt
Thank you for some common sense.
And here comes the Karen Read case
No. That isn’t exculpatory in any direct sense. Just red herrings to fool fools, as well as direct evidence of Furmans own guilt
It’s unfortunate that rich people get preferential treatment in this great country that is the United States Of America
White, not rich
@@puddincup9879OJ is white ?
yeah like Trump
@@puddincup9879 OK then Diddy is white, OJ is white too right ?
What's funny is it took the oj case for America to figure this out. Before then it was a figment of our imagination. Lol it was called complaining
The better lawyers won for sure
Rodney King won this case for OJ. LAPD was heavily hated at that time.
@@mistamycallRodney King wasn’t involved. In fact, police would’ve arrested the punks who beat Rodney King because he was an innocent black man.
@@mistamycall And during this trial everyone understood why.
@@mistamycall Rodney King had nothing to do with it. The court just did a very bad job of prosecuting OJ.
@@KadeemG61 And Rodney King was not an innocent man but a drunken driver. Alcohol killed him at age 49 like ti did Amy Winehouse.
OJ didn’t call police about his whereabouts! A couple called police when they saw AC driving the Bronco on the freeway. With 2.34 MILLION subscribers, I would have thought you’d get facts straight.
Plus didn’t the Bronco belong to OJ not AC???
@@archuleta1000 Both OJ and AL Cowlings owned white Broncos at the time. OJs Bronco was given to him by Hertz for making commercials for them. AC Cowlings later bought his white Bronco. At the time of the chase, OJs Bronco was in the Police Crime Lab being searched for forensic evidence. They were in Al Cowlings Bronco during the chase.
@@archuleta1000 they each had one, but that one was AC’s. I think OJ’s was probably taken as evidence.
After the police have been notified and knew where he was, detective Tom Lange I believe it was called him on the car phone.
Kinda...He did call 911 but not about his whereabouts. A couple did tip the police off but OJ was gone by the time they responded so they had to trace his 911 calls.
oj called 911 and they traced his call.
When Mark Furhman is your star ⭐️ witness that is REASONABLE DOUBT. Game set match! Johnny Cochran for the win.
Ron Goldman fought for his life; yet OJ had no bruises or a lot of cuts on him. Either he didn’t do it or he had help.
Shhh.... don't bother the "OJ did it people' (mostly "colorblind" racists and alt-righters) with facts about the case. It hurts their emotions.
We're talking about a former NFL football player fighting a normal guy. I'm not sure OJ would have needed help.
@@JeanValjean875 Wait...... You said this "We're talking about a former NFL football player fighting a normal guy."
Wait.. just wait........... *so because someone was a former NFL player, with their final game being 14 and a half years earler, that means that when they are in their late forties with chronic arthritis and move with a limp, they can completely overwhelm a guy the same size who is a fit martial artist more than twenty years younger??? And ALL BY HIMSELF???*
And it also means that the former NFL player, *even though he's in his late forties with chronic arthritis, has a body made out of armor that he receives NO bruises or marks anywhere on his body despite the fact that Ron's autopsy showed he had defense wounds and was in a vicious fight to defend himself?*
What drugs have you been taking, because it's obviously something worse than the cocaine that Nicole took and Ron Goldman sold?
@@JeanValjean875 Wait...... You said this "We're talking about a former NFL football player fighting a normal guy."
Wait.. just wait........... *so because someone was a former NFL player, with their final game being 14 and a half years earler, that means that when they are in their late forties with chronic arthritis and move with a limp, they can completely overwhelm a guy the same size who is a fit martial artist more than twenty years younger??? And ALL BY HIMSELF???*
And it also means that the former NFL player, *even though he's in his late forties with chronic arthritis, has a body made out of armor that he receives NO bruises or marks anywhere on his body despite the fact that Ron's autopsy showed he had defense wounds and was in a vicious fight to defend himself?*
What drugs have you been taking, because it's obviously something worse than the cocaine that Nicole took and Ron Goldman sold?
@@JeanValjean875 YOU need some help. If your mental gymnastics are THIS bad, you really need some help.
Its absolutely remarkable how anytime a black man is found guilty, he is guilty according to the court of law. However, if a black man is found innocent he is guilty found guilty according to the streets. When can a black man be innocent? Or is he always guilty when in the judicial system?
Yep. To be born Black in America is to be born accused. And if you’re Black and therefore are, accused, by default, you’re guilty.
Because the statistics are overwhelming. If a black person gets arrested for a certain crime, 90% of the time he or she did it lol
This. Also interesting that we don't hear "get over it" when it comes to this case.
Courts don't find people "innocent". People with functioning brains know that OJ is not innocent. Not all that remarkable, really.
When he is doesn´t do it. When an innocent black man is convicted, there are efforts to free him.
Johnnie Cochran knew exactly which buttons to push with the jury and they reacted to it like trained circus seals.
OJ was found not guilty because Mark Fuhrman was proven to be racist and plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. Now cope
Lol yeah ok. A carrot stick could have defended oj and that jury would still acquitted him. That being said F Lee Bailey was the true star. Mindfucking the prosecution into asking for oj to put on the gloves and then setting Furman up then mowing him over. Cochran didn't really do anything but come up with a stupid rhyme.
Two words Rodney King
@@bradsanders407 100% BULLSHIT
@@DD-pz3kf O.J. owed his freedom to Rodney king.
Clark and Darden bungled the prosecution. No two ways about it.
The incompetent detectives that splashed blood on OJ car to taint the crime scene didn't help either.they bungled finding enough real evidence, so they faked it..
Yeah, they sure did.
They were a couple of doofuses.
God himself couldn't get a guilty verdict with that jury 😂😂😂
@@Vinny.X I can’t disagree with this statement. If the prosecution had performed competently, the outcome could have very well been the same. The jurors were predisposed to find not guilty due to recent racial events and injustices. We’ll never know though because of the prosecution. The Goldman and Brown families were robbed of a criminal conviction.
Correction. Was not in Santa Monica county. Nicole and OJ lived in Brentwood neighborhood (near Santa Monica) and it is in Los Angeles county.
They seem to have gotten basic facts completely wrong. OJ didn’t call police and tell them his whereabouts at all! You’d think with over 2 million subscribers, they’d at least make an effort.
Wasn't the ford his also 😅
They are attempting to create their own narrative to sway
Santa Monica is LA County
Brentwood is a neighborhood of the City of Los Angeles. Santa Monica is a separate city in Los Angeles County. There is no Santa Monica County, at least not in California.
Oj had the history of abuse and Nicole was afraid he would kill her and she was right Ron Goldman was sadly in the wrong place at the wrong time i feel truly sorry for the kids just horrible for them
Nicole and Ron Goldman were promiscuous and engulfed in a cocaine lifestyle. Don’t paint them as some sort of angels. Two of Goldmans friends were murdered in similar fashion, both drug related.
Ron Goldman has criminal charges from here to outta space God punished him for his sins
@@lancejacobsen8372 Source? This is the first time I have heard of this.
Lol😂
It came out that Nicole tried to leave OJ several times but her family discouraged her as he bought them all sorts of gifts and paid for her sister's college. Doesn't excuse what he did but they already knew about his history and might have avoided her murder had they not convinced her to stay.
Two people savagely slain and Simpson publicly stressed that the crime "killed" his public image. Olympic narcissist.
Naaa, he was answering a question and he simply made a valid point.
Simpson should've won an Oscar after putting on those gloves.
nuh... he didnt convince anyone... everybody knew that he did it, they acquitted him for different reasons..
I know right he put a hell of a performance
OJ searched all those golf courses looking for the killer. All he had to do was look in his golf cart.
And see your mom making a killing doming dudes off.
You white ppl lol salty after all these years gahahaha
Killers are known for lurking in golf courses.😊
@@marianna7702 Not the kind of killers who work as hitmen kill someone as well as their boss and coworkers and give colombian neckties. Try again.
@@marianna7702 in or on ? Moron
We all know what happened. He even had a book published called if I DID IT, explained how the murder "might have been committed" on chat shows and made the most awful jokes about his deceased ex-wife. Not the behaviour of someone wrongly accused of murder. Look at the face of Robert Kardashian who was sideshowed into this circus, when the verdict was delivered. Then there is the juror who admitted that this verdict was in retaliation to the Rodney King case. If He Did It? Of course he did. He was a violent, abusive ex-partner who came for revenge. A tale as old as time. RIP Nicole and Ron.
And I love all the comments from the black community about "respecting" the verdict....lol.....not many black people "respected" the acquittal verdict for the officers in the Rodney King case....such hypocrites .....didn't they burn L.A. to the ground ?!? So much for "respect "....
@@victoriavancartier7379 Except there was clear video evidence in Rodney King. There was reasonable doubt all over the OJ Simpson trial, including the lead detective who pleaded the fifth for planting evidence. "bur L.A. to the ground?" what " L.A." are you talking about?
"He even had a book published called if I DID IT," OJ Simpson never "had a book published" and he ever wrote a book.
@@naithngr81-jh2bb Yeah, so Google it.
@@naithngr81-jh2bb Oh babes that book was at every airport bookstore.
There was to much reasonable doubt!!
First, it's "too." Second, there was overwhelming inculpatory forensic evidence. Third, anyone who watched post-trial interviews with jurors like Carrie Bess know that this was a clear case of nullification, or, in Bess's words, "payback for Rodney King." Apparently, some people think two wrongs make a right.
@@grouchomarxist666 No, there was reasonable doubt. My ultra conservative lawyer friend said if he had been on the jury (and he was in his forties at the time of the case) he would have said the prosecution did NOT prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. In capital cases this was required. The fact that O.J. beat and abused his wife is not proof of a murder; the timeline was off; there was evidence of blood from a test tube inside a sock; the LA police was known to be corrupt, racist and violent, and this was exposed during the trial, so that the possibility of planted evidence and lying was reliable.
@@roseannrook7897 First, it doesn't matter that your conservative friend is a lawyer; juries weigh evidence, lawyers simply present it. Your friend has no special qualification.
Second, the DA's office made mistakes and yes, LAPD is racist and corrupt, but those things can be true at the same time O.J. Simpson slew two people, and there was a blood trail from the crime scene to Simpson's house and car.
@@grouchomarxist666 SOMEONE has to payback Rob King.
@@marblox9300 *Rod
My cousin lived in LA at the time.He said he would be aquited.Especially because what happened to Rodney King
There’s no doubt that the Rodney King case had to have had at least some influence in the outcome of OJ Sampson’s murder case.
Bc fuhrman pleaded the fifth. That’s all
I lived in smalltown Indiana at the time. I said he'd be acquitted cause of the King verdict.
@@bradsanders407 do you justify what happened to Rodney King? Do you think the court made the right decision of letting the police officers go?
@@kilduce4423 Really, it was basically in part, “payback” for the acquittal of the officers involved in the beating of Rodney that had some indirect influence in the acquittal of OJ. This was a time when racial inequality in the justice system was becoming very clear, and African Americans were getting tired of it, and the OJ Simpson case came as a perfect platform or focus point for the folks to fight back and create awareness in the inequalities they were facing.
“How does does a wookie, an 8 foot tall wookie, live on a planet with a bunch of 3 foot tall ewoks?? That DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!”
~The Chewbacca Defense by Johnny Cochran via South Park 😂🤣😂
I watched the trial when I was a kid. It honestly was circus. Look at all the people that got famous from it. That's all they cared about. The word sidebar was said so many time, it was stupid, and look what happened. A murderer went free.
Glove don’t fit 🤫
@@emeraldvenus it was a travesty.
@@AnaGomez-rl5vy Not when you have to wear another glove under it. Isotoners were form fitting gloves.
@@RickGamesNow The rubber glove was worn under it so not to contaminate it. Even if he hadn't worn a rubber glove, it was still too small. The glove was a size L and OJ's hands were 2XL size. They were two sizes too small for OJ. If it does not fit you must acquit. Oh year....the lead detective, who "found" the gloves as well as the person who "found" the rest of the "mountain of evidence" pleaded the fifth for planting evidence. OJ Simpson was 100% innocent. Period.
@@AnaGomez-rl5vy you're a reprehensible idiot
Mark Furman supposedly finding the bloody glove created reasonable doubt for many. And we all know that law enforcement never plant evidence--Right!!!!
Also, EDTA found in the blood 'stains'
Explain why he wrote “If I did it” then 😂😂😂
Prior assault against Nicole, no, you’re right OJ is a good dude 😂😂😂😂😂
@@Dominic018 Irrelevant. The police planted evidence and thus the case, quite rightly, was destroyed
@@somatotrophin1535 I agree legally he was innocent because poor prosecutions but he 100000% killed them two 😂
Planting evidence on a suspect before 100% knowing his alibi? Yeah ok buddy
LOL!! If there was no "surface" reason for Fuhrman to plant the glove, the WHY on earth would he plead the fifth to THAT question??? Those acts of repeatedly taking the 5th, ALONE almost single-handedly killed the entire Prosecution's case!!
even the dna could of been planted quite easily,plenty of crooked cops.
Sonny Liston former heavy weight champ was murdered by the mob and was made to look like a suicide. Maybe something like this happened to OJ.
I still can't believe what an idiot Marcia Clark was regarding the bloody gloves! OK - so you know the brand and size of the gloves booked into evidence. So you bring in to court the president or the CEO of the glove manufacturer, have him/her bring in a brand new pair of gloves (never worn) that are the exact brand, color and size of the gloves booked into evidence. Then you have OJ Simpson try on the new pair of gloves with his bare hands (opposed to wearing latex gloves as he did in court to try on the bloody gloves) and if the gloves fit...well you know.
It wasn't Marsha, it was Chris Darden.
They did do that. lol. And they fit.
@@KingMercury No - they had Simpson put on the gloves booked into evidence (ie the bloody gloves) NOT brand new pristine gloves.
@@jonathanspivak9716 no. Someone from the glove company was a witness and he tried on a new pair. That part wasn’t played on and the news so in ur limited reality, it didn’t happen.
@@KingMercury Sounds like something you dreamed! Please share with the class your source of information because the entire trial was televised. I'm serious please tell your source (ie website conspiracy theory link) because all the evidence was presented on TV, there was no part of the trial where the cameras were shut off. OJ Simpson ONLY tried on the bloody gloves, which were those gloves that were booked into evidence that got shrunk due to being blood soaked! Do you live in a state with winter weather? If you do and have bought leather gloves, you know after leather gloves are exposed to snow and water soaks in, your gloves get tighter. After thoroughly using my leather gloves during the winter, I have to buy a new pair prior to the next winter because the old pair is uncomfortably tight.
If you don't know, leather gloves shrink when wet and heat just like OJ's with that Oj did it.
Exactly, I remember cringing when they handed them to OJ to put on because I know leather shrinks when wet, couldn't understand why they ignored that very important fact.
They'd been kept preserved in a freezer in the police lab, when thawed out they'd shrunk.
The prosecutors should have bought the same gloves and had OJ try on the new gloves that were not exposed to moisture. Then he also would not have needed to wear the latex/vinyl gloves to protect the bloody gloves. One other point to make - have you ever tried to get a child to put on winter gloves they don’t want to wear? They will contort their hands so the glove “doesn’t “ fit.
That's definitely not the reason why it didn't fit.
@@_Jem_ 🙄
Goldman should have just handed OJ. the eyeglasses and left, instead of going into a stance and trying to be the karate kid, especially with one of the most coordinated people in the world. According to Vince Gironda, OJ. was the most coordinated person in the world, period.
😂😂😂
So disappointing that people let a very likely murderer walk free simply because of race
Would appear to be the case. The r a c I a l grievance revenge mindset.
@christerry1773 Didn't the white jurors let J.W. Milam and Roy Bryant go free because they were white? They killed Emmett Till in 1955, a black teenager. B4 u excoriate oj for his sins u might want to check your kinfolks sins
I know it is tragic they let him get away with it
He was found not guilty because of a bad cop, forensic issues, LA PD history, unfocused prosecution, good defense and Rodney King.
The first sensible opinion I've heard here.
No he was found not guilty because the blood that was found at the scene had EDTA in it. Which means it came from a vile after OJ volunteered to give them his blood samples. They were riding around with his DNA ffs 😭
The domestic abuser (he pleaded no contest, this is undisputed) was found not guilty of murder because he was rich enough to hire a bunch of good lawyers that exposed a cop for being a racist and Nazi merch collector.
No wonder it made for such good TV!
And the sheer stupidity of the jury.
@@asmith8947I know right
Then for that clown furman to “plead the fifth” on every question…how can OJ be guilty of murder?!
Lmbo but u r correct. 😅
Find the recordings of OJ talking to Detective Tom Lange during the Bronco chase. Total talk of a guilty person. OJ saying that he was a bad person and did not deserve to live.
None of that matters they still won! Nobody cared about Rodney King yal cheered
😮 Tom was out of line to try to stop that suicide. I don't care about the law of man, if he truly loved his wife with a raging furious passion strong enough to do that bloody deed, he would want to kill his own self afterwards. (Othello... nobody ever heard of that famous play?) The black Moor kills Desdemona, then himself. Bas. Seems silly to intervene one way or the other , unless God is involved in the personal decision of the individual. God can say "your body is mine, I created it, not you and I want you to stop trying to be God by taking your life."
@@deandreray3500sounds like you don’t care if he did the murder in your eyes it’s “payback” in some sick twisted way
@@deandreray3500I disagree, lots of us cared about Rodney King and were glad when the officers who viciously and unjustly beat him were tried and convicted of civil rights violations. Lots of us also cared when Ron and Nicole were brutally murdered by OJ, and didn’t relate it all to race or Rodney King. OJ was just a violent and jealous narcissist who couldn’t control his rage. It should have never been connected to the Rodney King case.
@@anthonydonofrio3869exactly right no one should get away with committing crimes definitely get punished for it two innocent victims were brutally murdered and the person killer got away with it
The prosecution looked through every trash can there and even dump site. The guy saw oj throw away a small bag, not even something that clothes would fit in.
Prosecution didn't call him because this was an empty path for them.
The blood on the sock had EDTA in the blood drops, and the blood went through one side of the socks and transferred to the other side of the sock. This could not happen if a foot and ankle were in the sock. The droplets were more likely dropped on the socks from a dropper.
Vincent Bugliosi, who put the Manson family behind bars, said the O. J.'s legal team was not even good, but the prosecutors did such a bad job of trying him.
People need to look up Bugliosi’s background. Guy was a scumbag who abused women.
The dream team was phenomenal
OJ legal team was phenomenal
What an idiot. They earned every dime they made. They played the prosecution like a fiddle. They were so good that had it been an all white jury (or the very least a 100% unbiased jury) he still may have been found not guilty. Ole Vincent bogblahblah is clearly green with envy.
@@drlove994 Nah, they were crap. The prosecution were worse than the Keystone Kops.
I still believe he didn't kill them that detective went straight to that glove as if he knew it was there I believe Nichole o r her boy friend owed some real big wheeler or that boy was involved with some organization. Like Whitney houston! I remember that Columbian neck tie talk a simple black man ain't gonna take the time to pull someone tongue out so it will hang out and you will have to be well experienced to do that
How do you explain his blood found at the crime scene and Nicole’s blood found at OJ’s house?
A double murderer got away with killing two innocent people 😢
And then Fox News hired Mark Furman....
He fits their profile perfectly.
@@cli4g67graS racist how? in those bombshell 2 hour tapes, he said the N word only twice. He was playing a character for a screenwriter who was writing a fictional movie about cops
@@radrobd123 really?He was acting?I didn't know that. Then why was he convicted ?
Mark Fuhrman was a typical LA police detective in the 90s. There isn't a shred of evidence that he was a strident racist.
@@cli4g67graS because Cochran made it about race when it really wasn't. The jury didn't even care about the evidence. It was restorative justice, payback for Rodney King.
Why does everybody keep claiming they didn't fit? They were a little tight, because they had shrunk a bit from all the blood that had dried on them, but they did fit over his hands. Even with all of Simpson 's false pantomiming and gesticulations they fit.
Gloves Don’t shrink From blood
OJ was as innocent as warm apple pie baby! OJ is the real victim!!! Dirty cops, dirty tactics, bad lawyers,The real killer is still out there, it’s as simple as that Jack, in like Flin Tim.
His legal team , advised him to eat plenty of salty things , so his hands would swell up .
@@josephforest7605 negative. That’s not how it works . Nice try
OJ Simpson also had arthritis that a lot of people didn't know about.. when the trial was on its way Robert Shapiro told OJ to stop taking his arthritis medicine it would make his hands bloated a little bit
2 innocent people were slaughtered and the guy who did it got away with it. The jury should be disgusted with themselves. Their level of perception and seemingly the majority of the USA perception of that time had no place on a jury let alone a court room. He walked free
Would like to know whatever happened to the knife....
Since Ron's boss' autopsy showed he was killed with a very similar knife, it was probably the same one.
Eye witness says they saw OJ at LAX airport the night of the murders with a suspicious bag that he threw away at the airport trashcan.
Police didn’t follow up on it in time, but realistically they only had about 2-3 days to recover it before it went to a land fill and the eye witness took a little long
I don’t think they ever recovered the murder weapon.
Back in Columbia
bleach, dish soap, polish, and back in OJs guest house
Then who did it? We aren’t looking for the person who killed 2 people?
Darden and Clarke were bumbling idiots. How could you be so ill prepared?
The unknown footprints throughout the blood bothers me and should bother everyone!
??
@@darkhorse9472 There was an extra UNIDENTIFIED set of footprints through the blood and OBVIOUSLY they werent OJ's or any cop, CSI, ME, etc.. they cancelled out everyone who worked the scene!
They're known. They're ojs and her dogs.
@@bradsanders407 NO THEY ARE NOT
FBI footwear expert Bodziak examined this claim and rejected it, testifying there is no doubt there are only one set of footprints at the scene.
That's BS on why Shively didn't testify. She claimed to have seen oj after he was already home.
Yea,for starters, why are you in a police chase with a gun to your head if your not guilty of something! Duh!
That was before the trial a year later in 1995. In 1994, OJ was in a bronco chase so that everyone view it for the world to see. If you watched O.J. Made In America: there were a few people in the streets cheering for him.
@@KadeemG61 So you think the chase was staged to build public support for Simpson? If you were devastated by the loss of your ex wife and concerned about the well being of your children you wouldn't be suicidal. For OJ it was always about OJ.
OJ also had his passport and $10,000 in cash you really think he was going to commit suicide to begin with hell no that was the second plan he was leaving the country
Yes, there were idiots cheering him
World's slowest "police chase"
Never made sense to me that conveniently 1 glove was at the murder seen and the other was dropped at his house.
I love how they say OJ just forgot his one glove "fell off" at the scene and just left it there, but then he ran and hid the clothes/shoes/knife (so he was naked?) but forgot to include the other glove with the clothes/shoes/knife....and then just dropped that other glove at his house??????
He had a glove ripped off during the struggle with Ron. He's not sticking around to look for it after the murders.
@@mikedexheimer1481 so according to you, OJ had time to stick around to mutilate the bodies the same way as what happened to rons boss, yet he didn't have time to pick the glove up and take it with him?
Also, OJ had time to run somewhere, hide the clothes and the knife (so he's now butt naked), and so it so well that out of nowhere thirty years none of it was ever found, then bathe himself.....yet he keeps the other glove...and brings it to his house and jist drops it outside his house at his air conditioner????
Do some actual research. If you think he didn't do it, then good luck to you. He only got off because the prosecution bungled the case.
@@mikedexheimer1481you are absolutely right he left it there so he ran away from the murders it clearly fit his hands his doctor told him to stop taking his arthritis meds made his hands swell
The main thing that doesnt make sense is the fact that he cut his wifes head off and wasnt convicted of murder.
The Mezzaluna Restaurant and its employees were going missing left and right, and it took more than one person to take down two people at once.
Nichols mother said she was on the phone with nicole at the exact supposed times of the murders. A judge sealed the phone records for 75 years . POOR VIDEO
Where is your proof of this statement???? A video, online report or even the magazine it was in??
The FACT that OJ didn’t even ask if the kids were safe or how Nicole died when police told him she had been killed tells you all you need to know about OJ’s guilt or innocence.
He presumed she was shot to death,
What you say is simply not true. Did you watch any of the CROSS EXAMINATIONS of the police and detective witnesses? Of course you didn't.
How anyone still thinks he didn't do it beyond me. Nobody else had a reason to do it. He alone has abused Nicole multiple times in the past, he alone tried to control her and when he no longer could he ended her life and the life of that poor young man Ron.
No evidence OJ kill those two people that is why he was not convicted.
The butler did it in the lounge with the candlestick… no… the maid did it in the kitchen with the lead pipe… no… OJ did it with the knife and like any other femicide, « if I can’t have you no one else can «
RIP Nicole & Ron
OJ was found not guilty because Mark Fuhrman was proven to be racist and plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. Now cope
Funny but true
What was the reason for the acquittal? Dude, we all know the answer to that. And it has nothing to do with the constitution.
The fact that he was aquitted certainly still doesnt make sense
If you watch the trial you will understand. It is on TH-cam
OJ can rest easy knowing Nicole's killer is now dead.
Copy/paste again. I don’t disagree but c’mon
@@pjesfor the real killer is now worried that O.J is dead 😂😂
@@rolandocedillo5685 You mean the tooth fairy? They’re one in the same
YAWN
This is simply another case where we will never really know what happened, just like the Kennedy assassination! Whether you believe he did it or not.....we will never know!
Oh did not call 911.
AC Cowlings was the one who called.
At least now, he can rest in peace knowing the murderer of his wife and friend has died..
omg will yall give that one a rest!
@@Uniquaization GUILTY! He won't have his sleazy lawyerd on Judgement Day.
So he was on a plane to Chicago? How could he be in two places at once?
It was a very interesting case albeit tragic
This is decisive for me: to frame OJ by planting evidence (as the jury found), the police would have to know the most famous guy in LA would have no alibi.
They have been doing that for years. I’m sure they have/had some system in planting evidence and/or removing it when necessary.
Dude do you have any clue how many famous people live in LA? OJ at the time wouldn't have cracked the top 100 lol.
perhaps but it didn't happen in this case. Evidence was overwhelming as to Simpson's guilt, the jury was a disaster. @@KingMercury
@@Chck314I disagree. Evidence places him at the crime scene. But not overwhelming evidence that he did it. I believe he was an accomplice but not the murder.
He did have a alibi. He went to Chicago. They were trying to say that OJ did everything within a 25 minute time frame. He had time to clean himself up get rid of evidence and still catch a flight out of LAX. All within 25 minutes? You’d have to be the Flash or something to do all that.
If he didn't do it who did and why
Research the murder of Brett Cantor
The other Guy
That was a mob hit on dope addicted people that owed a drug bill OJ started to refuse to pay.
Drug cartel. Ron and Nicole owed debts. Look up Michael Nigg and Brett Cantor
@@kilduce4423
Brett Cantor - Hollywood
An exact murder of Nicole Brown- Ron Goldman
An exact investigation into cocaine distribution
Involving the murder of Michael Nigg Mezzaluna Aspen
An exact investigation in the murders of Nicole Simpson/ Goldman
Mezzaluna Brentwood
The thing I didn’t understand why there was so little blood inside and outside the Broncos.
Because he didn't do it. It was either Jason Simpson (his son) or the mob
because he did the damage and split. then they bled out
OJ guilty 1) he had a cut on his finger 2)he kept that glove on his hand so the blood wouldn’t go all over the place when he drove home that’s why they found the glove on his property. 3) he was late getting back home when he saw the limo already waiting in front of his house that’s why he parked on the street instead of his driveway and climbed over the fence and went thru his backyard dropping the glove before he got in the back of house. 4 ) the glove did fit he just made it look like it didn’t by keeping his fingers spread out but it did fit.
I had heard he stopped taking his arthritis meds so his hands were swollen.
I also thought leather gloves that get wet tend to shrink, so of course it wouldn't fit.
Guess what…he was found NOT GUILTY! That means he didn’t do it!
@@mikelowrey__ Would the nation have exploded in race riots? The jury did the right thing. They saved dozens, if not thousands of people that would have been killed in the ensuing race riots.
@@mikelowrey__that’s not true. if that’s the case innocent people wouldn’t be “found guilty.” ojs lawyers were just better. he killed that woman and man for sure.
@@DramatikChangezso, by your logic…HE, OJ left the airport, got to the scene and killed not one, but two people…got rid of the knife and cleaned himself up all in a matter of 20 minutes?! Ron was a black belt in karate and half OJ’s age, but OJ killed him and Nicole at the same time and managed to get away with no scratches, scrapes or injuries?! Plus Ron fought back, but didn’t have OJ’s dna under his nails! You people clearly rode the short yellow bus to school everyday!
This guy went on to be a whole menace to society for 30 years and showed 0 remorse. It shows how our system constantly fails law abiding citizens.
Why would he show remorse after being found Not Guilty? Are you stupid?
I know right
Mark Furman was racist. Most people including the jury saw this as a case of "black justice" . But its an example of " rich justice". O.J. lived amongst and associated with rich white people. Whether he committed murder or not he was found not guilty because he could afford the best lawyers.
Yeah ok. That's why a black juror said "we take care of our own" and another admitted it was retaliation for Rodney king. If they truly were weighing the evidence then how did they come to a verdict s quickly? Cause they didn't talk about the evidence. They all knew they were voting not guilty from the jump.
Exactly well said
"O.J. Simpson once said he'd take a bullet for Nicole. What an awful shame when the one who said he'd die for you, kills you."
Jill Shively testified that she saw OJ at 10:50. Prosecution need OJ home by 10:40 to be heard by Kato. That's why they didn't have her testify. The lack of honesty about this case is mind boggling.
Not to mention she sold her story
@@naithngr81-jh2bb The prosecution put Fuhrman on the stand and they KNEW he was a racist, crooked cop. You think they'd hide from Shively?
She was bad for their timeline. They tried to get her to say she was there earlier but she wouldn't.
Her testimony did not fit their timeline. And the guy who claimed he saw OJ disposing a gym bag in the trash at the airport was debunked by airport video surveillance footage. Neither of these “witnesses” would have helped the prosecution, and would have given the defense more ammunition by pointing out how some people just want that 15 minutes of fame. In addition, the theory that OJ had stripped out of his bloody clothes to prevent getting the interior of the bronco soaked with blood would mean that he definitely would not be trying to draw attention to himself by doing road rage. Miss Shively also claimed she has made a phone call to the non emergency police number that night to report it, but police records show she did not.
No that's not the reason she didn't testify. The reason was that she was lying. Listen to her testimony in the grand jury, she only called police on Tuesday not Monday morning like she says, and LA police only talked to her on Wednesday, this is all on file with the LA POLICE 😊
@@mindyjones3770 exactly what I said (regarding the airport security video). How ridiculous of a claim by the prosecution and a "witness". I'm certain the first thing the LAPD did was review airport surveillance, which would have every angle of every square inch of LAX covered. It wouldn't take long, either, as they only need to look at the time between 11;15pm and 11:45pm, and a limo and OJ himself would not be difficult to identify in the video. What gets lost in all of this is that 2 people were murdered.
"keep up the good work, 2 less we got to worry about"
-New Jack
Yeah, he almost got killed by a bunch of angry rednecks, for saying that!!!
OJ more than likely knew who did it.
OJ probably did have an idea that they were mobsters.
Charlie Ehrlich ?
Well, Ehrlich isn't connected to the 1993 murder of Brett Cantor
But, Nicole Brown Simpson & Ron Goldman are connected to knowing who killed Brett Cantor, with the same style of knife in the same manor
Every time he looked into a mirror
OJ probably hired the killer
@@Davepool-hs7vr
Identify Charlie Ehrlich
Other than a name you've only heard
the narrator has to know the reason the prosecution didn’t use Jill Shively or whatever is because she was proven to have lied about seeing OJ after the murder & they uncovered her past of ripping people off, not just because she sold her story
also, gotta know it was a ghostwriter who wrote If I Did It…stupid to have his name attached at all, but still he didn’t truly write it (maybe verbalized some points tho lol)
The narratives , are public opinions, not legal facts!
This began, with handcuffs, under a protest of being questioned
It ends, with entering the Bronco, & Rockingham estate without a warrant .
Now that we know that O.J Simpson wasn't in danger
let's arrest him for murder
Yea idk. This happened when I was really young and I always thought he was 💯 guilty but idk anymore. The media really hyped this up and made him look really bad but there’s things that don’t make sense. Fuhrman pleading the 5th on whether he planted evidence is wild and then Ron Goldman having bruises on his hands like he hit someone and OJ not having wounds consistent with that. I’m not saying he’s innocent, alls I’m saying is I’m not 💯 sure anymore🤷♂️
Im still waiting on someone to explain how EDTA blood preservatives showed up in a few blood spots and not others, then the socks where blood went from one side through his ankle and out the other side 🤔 if im on a jury and the state is asking me to basically take someone's life because in effect thats what ill be doing if i find someone guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder they are definitely going to have to explain that to me
I still don’t get the trying on of the gloves while wearing gloves lol
One thing that STILL doesn't make sense, what Jason's role was.
Or AC Cowlings
No evidence of Jason.
It was never explained by either side who’s car was parked in OJ driveway when the Limo picked him up. His daughter returned later that night and parked there. The only thing the jury asked to be read back was testimony about that car. So someone else was at least at the house that night and it has never been explained who it was or what they did that night.
@@ShinkuGouki Unknown footprints in the blood
@@davge107believe the oldest daughter was at oj house when cops come the night of murder
Nah they handled it like someone who is innocent until proven guilty
It became a no matter what OJ was guilty,and we all know why.
LAPD planted bloody glove and created doubt. That racist detectives fault.
Thank u for the truth.
I wonder if his brain is going to be tested for CTE. I bet he had it.
Even if he did, his last will stated he wanted to be cremated. We will probably not know for certain
Probably he did had it
OJ should have an autopsy checking for CTE. Massive head trauma that often causes violent and erratic behavior, frequently seen the autopsies of sports players, notably Football and Boxing.
Please don't tell me you think that's a valid reason for what he did.
@@minkymott i think it could definitely be a likely and contributing factor. Definitely not an excuse, and I’m obviously not condoning anything.
@@andyscott5277 ok. I'm sorry if it seemed like I was accusing you of it. You just never know when you communicate online. But you are absolutely right. His anger issues could have been caused by CTE. Or at least a contributing factor.
Chris Benoit killed whis whole family due to CTE.
LAPD screwed up.
What doesn’t make sense is his not guilty decision.
That happens in a court of law. 😅
he was found not guilty because jurors do not have to take an IQ test. Interviews with some of those people, are available and, it is unforgettable to hear them talk
Exactly. Some of those people didn't even know what DNA is. Many of them had hardly even finished high school. And this is not my opinion. One of the jurors interviewed for the Academy Award-winning documentary "O.J.: Made in America" said that he didn't know what DNA was
The police planted evidence (for no reason) and the lead investigator plead the 5th to whether he planted evidence or not. The prosecution/ police lost the case
@Axecarter91 no one planted evidence, because as we all know he killed both. Even his attorneys knew he did it
It’s because the evidence doesn’t add up 😅 and the cop taking the 5th when asked did you plant evidence
@Yumiiyumi- why would he plant evidence? the man killed 2 people and he is cut and has bruises. There was a history of physical violence. The judge knew about a conversation in jail where the man accepted to a visitor that he did it. The judge didn't allow that in court, but the judge knew this info.
There is no way on gods green earth that he is innocent he committed cold hearted murder
So obvious,. It's disturbing how so many people still think he was innocent.
‘A fair chance he was guilty?’ Nah. He was guilty AF.
No he wasn't. OJ was found not guilty because Mark Fuhrman was proven to be racist and plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. Now cope
@@salj.5459 Also not to mention a jury member came out saying 90 percent of them believed he was guilty but only didn't convict to get back at the system. That's very telling.
@@imjustanameless That was one person's opinion of the event. There was enough reason to acquit because the prosecution did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Thanks mostly to Mark Fuhrman
Oj made 3 suicide notes. One for his mom, kids and public. Prior to his arrest, he was going to kill himself at Nicole's cemetery.
“Ron and Nicole were physically dead and it’s almost like they killed me, who I was was attacked and murdered also” OJ Simpson
Where is your compassion for OJ people?
4:59 IMMEDIATE DOWNVOTE. The detective didn’t say those things himself, he was reading lines written by a writer for a role. It was an audition tape. It was also recorded like eight years earlier and Mark Furman had a long and celebrated career as an inner city cop before the trial.
Not to mention that at the time of the murders, OJ was regarded as one of the most beloved celebrities in LA by the police because he attended police fundraiser parties. OJ brought in thousands for the LAPD.
If the police was going to frame, they would frame Mark Furman before they ever thought about losing the star power and money OJ brought them. You can even see it in the first interrogation tape with detectives, OJ was given super soft ball questions despite being covered in cuts and bruises. They loved The Juice! They couldn’t believe he did it until they found overwhelming amounts of his DNA on the scene.
Mark Furman requested early retirement from the LAPD because he stated his hatred for black people made it impossible for him to do his job. This was way before the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. The prosecutors knew about this and yet they still chose to put him on the witness stand when it wasn't necessary to do so.
Cuts and Bruises?
Hmmnn, that's a new one.
Umm....No! She was interviewing him about his real experiences with LAPD for a screenplay she was planning on writing. Also, OJ wasn't covered in cuts & bruises. He had one cut. Tell me you don't know anything about the evidence in this case without telling me you don't know anything about the evidence in this case!
Wrong
@@ShipperTrash88 According to the physician who examined him 2 days after the murder, OJ had 11 cuts and abrasions on his hands.
At least he can rest easy knowing that his wifes murderer is dead now.😢
How in the blue hell OJ gets to kill them, then takes a shower and then flies to Chicago? It makes no sense ...
Easy, the bodies werent found yet
If he did do it. I think he jumped in a pool. Neighbors pool possibly.
@@KingMercury Bwhahahaaahahahaha bwhahahahaahahahahaha
How did he do it and get home in 25 minutes.
@@kelvinbarber1765 How did he do it and not be completely 100% saturated in blood from head to toe and only allegedly leave microscopic teency weency specs of blood? Nicole was almost decapitated so blood wouldve been spraying all over immediately until her heart stopped pumping, then it wouldve just been seeping out, heavily though! Rolling around with Ron while stabbing him wouldve also soaked the perp in blood!
The jury wasn't predominantly composed of eight African American jurors. It was composed of eight African American jurors.
To the ignorant ppl i agree with this take, ppl who actually researched the case cam not logically think he actually did it. No marks on ojs body , dna under her nails didn't match oj , ron had defense wounds on his hands so he was hitting someone, missing blood that was taken from ojs was missing, police admitted they took his blood home and back to the crime scene, how you and ppl like you seem to leave that out of your videos is very telling to me. The truth is he got a fair trial and was rightfully found not guilty.
So who did?
@@christopherhazell420 To the ignorant ppl i agree with this take, ppl who actually researched the case cam not logically think he actually did it. No marks on ojs body , dna under her nails didn't match oj , ron had defense wounds on his hands so he was hitting someone, missing blood that was taken from ojs was missing, police admitted they took his blood home and back to the crime scene, how you and ppl like you seem to leave that out of your videos is very telling to me. The truth is he got a fair trial and was rightfully found not guilty.
@@christopherhazell420. The serial killer Glen Rogers. He was in town at the time, handyman at Nicole’s, admitted to the crime, killed others with a knife, took a souvenir from Nicole and gave it to his mother. Two of his siblings outed him.
@@christopherhazell420that's for the police to find out. Glenn Rogers admitted to killing both of them.