Is the Citizenship Amendment Act Unconstitutional? Listen To CJI Chandrachud's son Abhinav
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มี.ค. 2024
- The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) has been a topic of intense debate in India. This discussion delves into the constitutionality of the Act, its implications on the secular fabric of the Indian Constitution, and its potential anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu biases. The speaker explores the historical context of Indian citizenship provisions, the impact of the partition of 1947, and the introduction of the permit system. The discussion also touches upon the equality provisions of the Indian Constitution, the exclusion of certain religious groups, and the reduction of the residence requirement for naturalization under the CAA. #citizenshipamendmentact #indianconstitution #secularism #religiouspersecution #naturalization #equality
Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a new video.
All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button!
India Today TV is India's leading English News Channel. India Today TH-cam channel offers latest news videos on Politics, Business, Cricket, Bollywood, Lifestyle, Auto, Technology, Travel, Entertainment and a lot more.
Stay tuned for latest updates and in-depth analysis of news from India and around the world!
WhatsApp Channel: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2A...
Download App: indiatoday.link/wHaj
Follow us: Official website: www.indiatoday.in/
Twitter: / indiatoday
Facebook: / indiatoday
His granddad was CJI of India
His father is current CJI of India
He is a practicing lawyer!!
Nepotism here also
@@ankit462 heavy nepotism
We need people like him,people who have a backbone to stand up to facist governments, we can’t have chamches who work like puppets and once they retire end up in government.
MOST IMPORTANT IN THE SAME COURT HALL OF HIS FATHER !!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks to uncle judges system; nothing to do with merit.
Why Waqf act is not unconstitutional
Exactly
CAA fulfills Affirmative Action in art 14. He is selectively talking. Fraud like his dad
How it will be unconstitutional please explain
@@raghavendranaik2877 Parallel Judiciary, Unlimited Power on Revenue claims, which violate human rights on a regular basis. The Act empowers the Body to snatch any land of anybody without any defence from the Executive. File a memorandum to claim a land, it will be theirs! If anybody has an Objection, they should approach a body inside the Waqf board which is constituted by Muslims appointed by Waqf. And it neither works based on affirmative action nor the act is required for arts 25-30. Regulation is not done like this!
Pappu ke abba nahi ....bolne denge pappu ko ...😂😂
He should also answer why Indian Judiciary is constituted by 80 families of India only... Why don't other established advocates out of those 80 families get's a chance to be CJI? Why don't they declare their assets to the County... Why is that declaration page blank on the website of our Supreme Court?
This is how educated individuals speak, unlike our PM, who wouldn't even stand a chance for a single minute in front of him. This is what India needs: educated, young leaders, not uneducated 10th pass old uncles.
அதெல்லாம் செல்லமாட்டார் திருட்டு பசங்க
@@luqman4426 education is not every thing there is some kind of common sense .
@@arpit1147 Please elaborate. What exactly is the context for common sense here?
@@luqman4426 lets compare to country minority citizens one is in Turkey and other in Pakistan . Both country are islamic but turkey is much good then Pakistan . Minorities are not mod leach in Turkey but they are in Pakistan. So who need CAA urgent in your opinion
In the comment section most people do not discusses about merits of his point.. Most try to attack him personally (A political technique to suppress opposing voices)..
Merits? I'll tell you about demerits. Here in West Bengal people are coming in from Bangladesh, giving our public exams and SOMEHOW getting the jobs and college seats???? Is it fair to me and my family as a taxpayer; seeing Bangladeshis illegally settling over here day in and day out? Not just the CAA, enforcement of NRC is also required.
Constitution gives provision for minorities to build religious sites and institutions using tax paters money. Hindus don't get this right.
Isn't this discrimination based on religion?? If this itself is not a discrimination, then how CAA can be??
Questioning him is not an attack. Stop foulcrying
Same point I also noticed
Tell him to talk about collegium system and parivarvad in apoointing judges in sc and Hc
True
First parivar rule in judiciary should stop
Judiciary should be transparent.
@@sureshgopalakrishnan9732 True. Let us start with Shri Ranjan Gogoi.
@@philipvarghese2366 whoever may be parivar in collegium is bad for india same as pappu & gandi family
It is collegium system that has given us a very brave CJI.... without having this system we would have CJI like CJI Anil Masih and Lt. Governer of various UTs and that CJI certainly works like Anil Masih.... Would you like that system?
there is a great need of Judicial reforms and political reforms. These are the only two institutions who can look after themselves superbly and no one can do anything about them. Sad state
Why secularism in India only for Hindus, every body have responsibility to keep th system alive.
Better to declare Bharat as a Hindu nation on priority, here others also can live like Hindus, residing at present in Pakistan or Bangladesh.Our nation must belongs to sanadan principal, respect to every religion, but if anyone could overtake and make their minority supremacy, how majority people allow such things as per majority power of votes.
@@pk123ashokan8secularism in CAA is for all religions except one. Not only for hindu!!!
Are you thick up there?
And it is so for a very good reason. Tha statistics regarding minority religions in neighbouring countries is alarming enough to pass this bill.
And just so you know in my opinion:
This is a master stroke of BJP, BJP is playing both the muslims and SC. Why?
If SC rejects CAA on the basis of “all religions have equal rights and should be treated equally”
Then on the same basis UCC can be enforced in the whole of this country.
One needs a brain to see the bigger picture. CAA is nothing but a bait.
Son is preaching against CAA, when the case in his father's court. God save India!
😂😂
What about collegium system and why you are not in RTI and declaration of wealth. Please explain us. Why exempted.
Good. He wonderfully exposes himself.
😂 true, he has nothing more than that his father is cji
Yes he is wonderfully is being exposed for a third generation of nepotism…. The judicial grooming gang.
Seems ur brain is in ur knee...do u even understand what he is explaining abt CAA😂😂😂
True!
😂 Do you even understand English?
Like father like son and like grandfather like grandson.👍
Please ask him about judicial appointments in higher ranks,dynasty appointments,out of priority hearings
Hindus are Hindus enemy
For any father having a son such as this brings pride !
Why there is no competitive examination in the Indian Judiciary system where as there is competitive exams in all the systems working in India. There should be some logic.
@@haridasization eat gobar
Dear M/s India Today. Thank you for Mr Abhinav Chandrachud's speech on CAA. He speaks volumes on secularism. Was the undivided British ruled India divided on secular principles? Are the Islamic Republics of Pakistan and Bangladesh secular? Why and how the non-Muslims of the two have been drastically reduced while the Muslim population of truncated India increased many fold and increasing creating a permanent demographic change in many states? He seems to be some what uncomfortable referring to atheists and agnostics. In a hypothetical question, can he say this in an Islamic country? All the same, I congratulate him being a good speaker. Best wishes, SC Panda
Would his opinion affect the case in SC where his father is CJ?
Absolutely 😮bcus they must have been discussed within there house as family.
In India, anybody can speak on anything . Ultimate casualty is application of mind.
Now in India PAPPU's population is increasing daybyday ..
Is he favour Muslims.
Gadhe wo cji ka beta hai bhut bada wakil hai teri tara sadakchap nahi hai
So you only want 1 party, 1 ideology to talk? You are only right and everyone should shut up? Control media, terrorise people asking questions, act like questioning govt is anti national and show Pikachu face when someone says democrat is in danger
We have bigger papu now 😂😂😅
Way better than cheap peejp and Feku though...
Are we seeing a SC Judge of the future, considering the current trends of appointment. Mr. Salve rightly observed, we are the only country which does this style of appointments.
Hello sir
Being the son of present CJI, this type of meaningless uttaraces are not expected from u. ur arguements are illogical and unworthy. I think u should spent more time for learning our history in depth and world history in general. For clapping from a partial crowed u deletion of jews, bhahayis, Rohingyas etc. hi lighted by u. Pl don't exhibit ur immaturity so openly.
Sure
Looks that you are great supporter of nepotism in Judiciary, don't you think it should be stopped ?
We do not want him to be SC of India.
Salve half converted we saw him in UK second marriage to English women 😂
Absolutely agree, this gentleman is speaking from the highest level of truth, the highest level of inclusiveness. But for the country we reduce the world inclusiveness to nation inclusiveness since nation is the most practical solution for well being of a large section of the world. For that absolute law is tweaked for the interests of the nation.
When India was divided, its land and wealth were divided proportionate to the population. If Muslims want to return to India, then proportionate share of land and wealth have to be re-transferred.
😂😂😂
No muslim should be taken back here.
If kids are born to illegal aliens, voting rights should not be given for for 1 generation
India was already divided a lot before the British . All those Hindu kings could not do shit about it as they were thinking about themselves.
The Muslims chose Pakistan. Their Heroes are Babar and Ghaznavi. No such person should be given Citizenship
Confused 2nd Generation Parrot, allowed a stage because of great collegium system - Do you agree on the reduction of Hindu & other Minority in Pakistan & other Islamic countries, Can you give a reason for the same?
Confused tera baap tha
@@muffin-js5ht Those countries were part of India, they decided to create their own country based on religion. Gov. had promised to take them back when things settle down. After so many decades they are getting justice. Even the deadline should not be there. They discriminate minorities by law. Hindus get discriminated in India by law as well. But atleast it's not as bad.
Great question. This guy is just as inept and corrupt as his dumb father
Case of ukrain and Israel are different. These hindus who came from pak and Banladesh were tortured there. Their forefathers were originally of India.
@@muffin-js5ht
India didn’t amend constitution to make CAA law . Get your facts right . India isnot a dumping yard to give citizenship for people all over the world. Muslims massacred in Israel should get citizenship in Islamic countries but they don’t ever shelter them, forget citizenship .
Please also explain the pacts signed by Mr. Nehru & Mr. Liyakat Ali and the 2013 parliament records of Mr. Manmohan Singh accepting the need of bringing Hindus & Sikhs from these 3 nations. If Israel can be formed as a Jewish nation, if Pakistan can be formed as Islamic Republic why can't we bring our fellow Dharmic brothers from these extremists nations? Don't always read and refer the laws, please act from heart.
As per our constitution and the system we choose, we are a democratic & sovereign country. Then what is democracy? Whether anybody accepts or unaccepts, likes or dislikes, the plea/vote/voice of majority is heard, accepted and functions. Now majority of the Indians are with CAA, why can't it be accepted and implemented.... damn hell with the rules of book.
As per constitution, if every citizen is equal, then why the need of personal laws and muslim waqf board?
Why common civil code is not being implemented since seven decades.
The only solution for this problem is to voice out public referendum or public poll. How can a person sitting on a verdict bench decide, let the citizens decide and this is truly democratic.
Very well studied , understood & conveyed. Hope our politicians are thoroughly educated before bringing there ideas for making a lawfor the convenienceof Votes. This ignorance should be eradicated. That’s the question & a very major , The challenge of the hour.
Next supreme court judge as per colegiam system..
Predecided
400 paar karwao, Sab badal denge... 400 paar, No collegium System.
Ok, if we buy your argument and decide to allow muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh to take citizenship under CAA then we will have to brought back the land from these two Pakistan and Bangladesh to accommodate them! Because partition was based on Religion and a sizable mass of land from pre independent india was allocated for those muslims! Are you agree with this? See there are many questions in this world which are very difficult to answer! Every Indian should take great care when speaking his or her mind when matter is very important for our Nation!
Muslims willingly migrated to Erstwhile East Pakistan and west Pakistan as per their own dream of having their own separate country! On the contrary most of the hindus and Sikhs had no choice to leave the land of newly created country Pakistan due to dangerous consequences of communal violence during partition as well as sugar coated promise of Pakistan leaders about protecting religious minority! Thanks
Mr. Chandrachur, Due to Hindu Bengali's sacrificed for Freedom ,now you are leaving in an independent country. Your family or community has no rule for Freedom movement. It was commitment at the time of partition that Hindus from Pakistan and now Bangladesh will get Shelter in India or in state like west Bengal.
Very true.
Excellent!! Does he read these comments or he is too supreme to consider reading these comments??
Bhai i really feel you should had to be appeared before the bench instead of Mr.Harish salve on behalf of SBI they might had won that argument.
JAI VISHVA GURU Howdy 🤠 MODI 👍
Its high time that judical changes should be done there is a family trend in supreme court tooo..
Each member earned it. You can't deny that. Each member applied their minds and not just sat there for knowledge to be spoonfed. They're sitting on those top positions not because their father was a CJI, but because they deserved to be a CJI.
Now the Son is directing his father" a way to give judgement accordingly "
whether Waqf Act is constitutional, abhinav baba. if tomorrow waqf board issues notice to supreme court for the ownership of land on which the hon'ble supreme court is build. supreme court has no remedy then to appear before waqf board, and waqf board will decide on the basis of representation made by the suprme court. is it consititutional abhinav baba
Reply: I will ask my masters and then give a speech on it.
It's precisely people like this fellow why the entire western world and India are fkd .... Ghettos flourishing everywhere and the momens will NOT adhere a Universal Civil Code of those nations whatsoever.
Waqf act is needed to stop illegal encroachment by bjp terrorists. Don't run away from the topic like your forefathers.
What is endowment board all temples control m it's funds.
"Secular" is a myth in our Indian Constitution, otherwise there wouldn't have been any partition of our country, and Pakistan has declared their country as an Islamic country, and India declared as Secular" country. I very well know , as to how our ancestors bore the brunt of partition and came to India as refugees Hindus in the Indian soil. There was no rehabilitation programme for them. The leaders of our country during that time hardly took notice of refugees from East Pakistan, now Bangladesh.
India became secular and socialist only in the year 1976 when emergency was unilaterly imposed on INDIA by the then dictator Indira. Indian preamble can not be amended under any circumstances. In the preamble there is no WORDs secular and Socialism in the ORIGINAL, Constitution of India.
Is it? Preamble to the Indian Constitution coins the word " Secular" a mere eye wash I think during the Congress rule...
@@samitasonlinetuitioncentre7340Yes
Ok, the words like 'secular" was not there in the Constitution initially, does it mean India is a religious country by its constitution ?@@haridasization
@@mohammedmustafak9049chintu don't have any answer, only what-aboutism 😂
What is his response to the counter by Sai Deepak.?
J sai is better than chandrachur's son ..... and even CJI as well
this is probleme of our education every educated person giving the knowledge to hindu but not muslim
It is because, Hindus are majority in population and Muslims are minorities.
Why is it a problem ?
How can you say giving knowledge to Hindu is a problem ?
And why do you expect that Muslims must also be given lectures like we lecture Hindus ?
Muslim aaya hi kyu aapke dimag me ? Muslims toh kisi ki baat bhi nahi sunte .. unhe samjha kar kiska fayeda hoga ?
Muslims are not worth wasting time with...jehadi mindset
@@apseeiitm
So you mean we should show the other cheek when one has already been slapped, a la Gandhi?
@@PC-tz6rw I just said , do not expect us to lecture muslims .. lectures are for people who listen and follow ... Muslims only follow that one pedophile
That is why the Collegium system must be aboilished. Parivarwad is not existing only in politics. There is ample evidence of nepotism in higher echelons of India's judiciary. The present CJI might not have become even a high court judge had his father not been CJI. His choice of which cases the Supreme Court must hear proves this. He decided that the Supreme Court would hear the petition for legalising same sex marriages. He wasted almost a week of a large number of judges hearing the case which he should have declined to hear in the first place. When he sensed the groundswell in our traditionally Sanatani society against this, he meekly stopped hearing the case. He is fond of interfering in the legislative and executive domains. Only abolition of Collegium system is the answer. If not, this chap will one day head the judiciary because he would be entitled being the son and grandson of ex CJIs.
Better than govt's puppet Judiciary.
Well-researched and convincing arguments.
When you are hurt his statements...when he showcases the shallowness of this ridiculous amendment....you came to say what a any Bhajpa chad would say...parivaarwad....
Better than govt's puppet Judiciary 👀
@@kiranjose1361 Parivarwad ko defend karne ke liye kuch bhi karega 😅😅😅
Brilliant! I’ve just realised the reality behind the CAA.
Becase of such people India is suffering today.
We hope him for our future.
Save our Democracy.God bless you.❤
Ahh the future CJI of India, indeed. This great collegium system is the reason why people like him get an audience in the first place. So, all this time he kept on recalling Muslims who wanted to come back to India were being hurdled by the permit system, but then he didn't for once mention why the muslims went to Pakistan after all. Muslim league won in muslim majority areas because they wanted a separate dominion and the reason for that was they couldn't live under a Hindu "majority". Now you voted for the two nation ideology and took away around one third of the Indian landmass. When things didn't realise as they wanted them to be in Pakistan, they wanted to come back but the landmass was already gone. INDIA HAD BEEN TORN APART ALREADY.
So, it's just like saying that you've a two storeyed building. On one floor you live and on the other your uncle lives. Your uncle doesn't want to live with you and creates a "Khilafat", sells his floor to somebody and moves to a different place. After getting to this new place of his choice, he realises it's worse than his earlier place and now wants to live with you on the same floor. And now you're being judged for not taking him in.
Sorry, the majority of this nation is done with your ideals that gives us a new kashmir every decade.
As far as this "esteemed" fellow is concerned, we'll take lessons from him on transparency, democracy and inclusiveness when he talks against the collegium system. Judiciary is the most autocratic arm of the Indian democracy. His father said that there are no better alternatives to the collegium system currently (basically, for him, the best system of appointment of judges is to let the judges appoint their sons/daughters/in laws). So, first you get competent enough in your business, then only let's talk history. Stop this judicial over reach, you guys are not that efficient at all to be discussing matters such as this.
Citizenship comes under the Union List and it is right there for the Parliament to act upon. And the Parliament, by nature of its elections, is the reflection of the democratic tilt of the nation. Everything comes after that.
Well said, sir. He is speaking for Lutyens, Islamists, evangelists and LeLis. His father released Zubair also. Chip of the old block. Patel should have asked Nehru to get back land, money given back to accommodate them. They reportedly got better geographical region than us. Thank less people. Not enough Indian Muslims occupied Kashmir by driving away Hindus from there.
Well said bro ❤❤❤❤❤
Pathetic 😅😅😅
crying like a dog😂😂 ur last words tells who you are. 😂😂
Sidhi baat
No bakwaas....
Partition was held on the basis of Religion. No more explanation on it CAA ✅
Exactly. And that is why CAA opponents should also become proponents of Akhand Bharat that each and every citizen will be equal citizen of the country required all the lost lands are merged back into this country.
That partition was done by British , now bjg government doing the same
@@binilsanthosh4891 LOL. Has the BJP demanded a separate country or something?
@@thecomment9489 India's stand during that partition , to be secular . Now BJP govt destroying that secular image India had in the past
@@binilsanthosh4891 Going by the same logic all the erstwhile presidencies and small kingdoms should be reinstated that existed at the time of independence in 1947. And how is the BHJ govt destroying the secular image of India? Have they banned non-Hindus from holding the high posts in this country to non-Hindu festivals have been banned or other such official policies have been put in place? Or is it just your rhetoric?
UCC is a must for the country !
Urgent need for Judicial Commission so that Judges dont appoint Judges like elsewhere across the globe.
you are 100 percent correct.
In history, he will be remembered as someone who consistently refused to support injustice and wrongdoing, and who always stood for truth and humanity.
Pls we need an explanation why two nations theory was adopted in the name of religion.when we realised that now what should be the best way to give justice to non Muslims?
Novice lawyer….please enlighten us on waqf act
That's not the topic here genius.
Every thing has a context. WAQF and Muslim personal laws were accepted first and took properties of Hindus away. They got to go first. CAA isn’t fully religious. It’s not accepting Hindus of whole world, just from 3 countries where they are experiencing persecution and genocide.
@@jacobcheriyan What about more than 20 million Illegal Bangladeshis and Rohingya's staying in India
@@user-qz3to7gd5l 20 million? hmm, show me your sources and how did they come. How did u come up with the number 20 million, please enlighten us.
@@jacobcheriyan that will never be a topic genius, English speaking indian colonized secularism ends here
We need Judicial reforms. Harish Salve ji rightly pointed out that India is the only Country where Judges appoint Judges. What will be the future of India if he becomes the CJI .
The waiting CJI of india . He is the right person for the right job . BE BLESSED 💐 🙌 🙏
Why are there no other competent persons?
Thank God for people with such sensibilities! This world still maybe worth living as long as we have people like Abhinav.
Judiciary cleanup is big needed....
If we can ....declare india a Hindu nation...not sure about the possibility, judiciary clean up will take place in one day
@@RichmondMe collegium system is most un-judicial thing. Judges appointing judges is joke
@@bashettybhanuprasadare bhai itna to pdhe likhe hai yeh inhe nahi pata collegium wgera ke bare me, inki liya bs congress hi sb kuch hai 😂😂
Clean up illiterate Power-politics from their thrones ...... Sweep down .
Clean up needed in uneducated Political neta sector
You can argue anything ,arguing is in an art,reality is something different,practicality is the need of the hour
👍👌
🤷
That's what people who don't understand arguments say. The point of argument is progress. An argument springs into form only when there's something wrong with the status quo, and there's a need for progress or change. Humans always seek for improving standards. The way forward is to come up with a reasonable rebuttal, not deny the need for argument.
Yes amit 😊shah yes
Their should be brought reform in judiciary too.
THE FUTURE OF INDIA SEEMS BLINK IF SUCH INDIVIDUALS ARE GOING TO FLURISH .I FEAR IN THE NEAR FUTURE HE WILL BE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF BHARAT
He has to argue with sai deepak
Who is that joker?
Not required. Anybody who has any idea of the CAA can see what a bundle of inanities he had blurted.
@@daredevil30000 hmm.... If he knows you called him that...he has a capacity to track your IP and find out which rat hole you live in and ensure that you are sent to a dustbin without internet access. Beware; the BJP IT cell is very active.
@@daredevil30000 He is not talking about Owaisi clown
Sai will crush him and beat this person on history and poor logic. Unfortunately when someone speaks good English and gets an captive audience they are considered wise. But they could be entertainers. Kapil Sharma is not that bad. He speaks better on this subject and entertains better than this person.
He is worried,He won't become a judge post 2024.😂
He is worried bcoz his father CJI post may get changed & their corruption may get declined slowly
I'm sure you are a north Indian andh bhakt 😂
@@nirins1Bhakts are in every part of India 😂
@@shujahmohammed9173 like wise MadrassaChap Dalal can b found everywhere in India 😂😂😂😂
@@SAMYAK-hg8li I am not madrasachap . You are a bhakt 😀😀
Do justice -Economic,political,social...
An intelligent analysis coming from a young India. This gives us hope that Indian Judiciary will survive even after Sr. Chandrachud Sir retires from office
But a nation has to take care of the security of the nation and its nationals at any cost
Baby born in USA of illegal immigrants can stay there. BUT. Parents should leave that country or be in jail?!
How is illegal according to laws of America or quran/bulbul
They must leave
Brilliant bit of hairsplitting! If say all the categories of people he mentions squeeze in large numbers freely and set up residence in his locality would he still stand by his principles?
according to Quran there is no illegal immigrant any where. as long as you obey the law of land and don't create chaos in the land, you are entitled to live there.@@madhukiran70
he has explained well enough.
Unfortunately Godse followers have issues
When the matter is under consideration of the apex court it is most unfortunate to discuss pros cons. Nothing is permanent in this world!
People need to educate themselves before they reject even before understanding the same.
It is easy to find out lacunae . Let him be law maker n resolve population explosion issue. Would appreciate if he throws some light in resolving population issue.
Let him contest a loksabha election..then he will get to know.. because of collegium system he assured that one day he will be SC cji ..
Very well said.....
Bang on point👏👏
Judges need to follow law, not rewrite them.
Why did bjp rewriting election commission rules then ?
Law needs to be corrected if it is Corrupted. That is why Judges needs to be there.
No, they are to Judge if the law upholds the constitutional values.
चीफ जस्टिस के पुत्र के विचार जानकर dukh hua सरकार को अच्छी न्यायिक पोस्ट पर बैठने वाले राष्ट्रवाद की शिक्षा देनी चाहिए
More questions posed than any answers provided..how convenient to play to the gallery
The boy is mixing up issues...sounds typically like a "librandu intellectual"... Wish he had carefully considered the historical contexts of the Nehru-Liaquat Pact! Next he'll be asking for the persecuted Uighurs in China to be included in CAA. Bharat is NOT a _dharamshala_ that just about anybody can demand Bharatiya citizenship. At least he should have appreciated that after decades of inaction and apathy, the incumbent govt has vowed to take the matter to its rightful, logical conclusion. Even if there're indeed *other non muslim persecuted minorities in pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan,* their case can be considered at a later date but only after ascertaining that they were indeed the citizens of the undivided Bharat prior to 1947. Choosing 31st Dec, 2014 as cutoff date can't be an issue as any date chosen can be questioned and hue and cry raised over it. Sad to see that such seemingly bright young lads don't apply themselves before expressing their views based on half cooked, part information which is simply out of context of the main historical reference.
Yes, Bharat is Not a dharmshala. Why allow even the persecuted minorities to become a citizen of India ? Our resources are already finite and accumulated in the hands of few and we are bringing more people and increasing the competition for these resources. Jobs are already less and these people are going to get their own share of reservation under EWS category. Perhaps you are connecting with their religious identity only but despite being a Hindu, I can not connect with them because of their former national identity. They also made their choice to stay in those countries just like majority Muslims did to leave India. The developed world is giving citizenship to the "crème de la crème" of other countries that could bring talent and skill with them and here, India is giving citizenship to extra economic liabilities. Arey humare khud ke problems kam hai kyaa !!! I'm not a politically aligned person, but even I can see BJP is doing this because all these new "Hindu" citizens would vote for BJP in 2024. BJP gives two f**ks about what will happen to them post the election. Hum middle class ko hi bhugatna parega !
@@Escapist... Why allow? Because a historical obligation to these persecuted minorities in shape of granting citizenship has to be fulfilled for these already arrived groups, and at various levels and times in the past voices have been raised to implement this Pact, which includes those parties who are now opposing it!
@@Escapist... What do you do to these persecuted minorities? Ask them to go back, be killed, r@.ped, converted etc. there? Mind you, CAA is only a limited provision specific to these particular groups of people who took refuge here uptill 31st December 2014. Not just anybody else!
@@Escapist... CAA has a religious colour simply because it has historical roots in Nehru-Liaquat Pact and deals with only persecuted non muslim minorities of three adjoining muslim countries. It has strong connection to partition of Bharat on religious lines. Since the three neighbouring countries are avowedly islamic, so majority muslim population can't be deemed to be persecuted there! Hence they cannot find favour as per the CAA provisions. Clear?
@@amaratvak6998 Historical obligation ke chakkar me humko apni aur next generation ka Future doobte dikh raha hai. I honestly don't care about to what religion they belong or which party was earlier supporting it, the only and only thing I'm worried about and every Indian should be that our already limited resources are going to be even more scarce, more mouth to feed, more subsidiaries 😫 Given the fact that they're persecuted minorities, we can't be even sure what positive value addition they'll bring to our intellectual-labour force to even consider them as assets. Sorry but they're just vote-banks.
Chaliye goodnight
Please do come with a similar video on waqf board describing how much secular and constitutional it is.
Plz some body tell him participation was done on the religious beliefs
Respected Sir
Thanks for sharing your Knowledge
i salute you sir
your are a Great Indian
🙏🙏🙏👌👌👌👌👌
Halleluijah ❤
This gentleman needs to look at his historical knowledge because he has stated lots of wrong facts
Like what?
@@nehegavshdb it's all where he explained the crisis during 1947 independence
Wrong facts???
@@reishunlungleng677 he certainly did not explained the rope of Gandhi during the citizenship crisis...he did not outlined the massacre cry against THE MINORITY of these Islamic majority nations which ultimately led to the persecution...he also did not narrate Nehru's more extreme approach to the displaced minority from other nations....
@@Royallmen ok brother...so what's the facts according to you??
Like father, like son, like grandson. It took CJI DY Chandrachud almost 40 years to disown his father's ADM judgment, but with no consequences to the senior judge, for all the human rights violations that were justified by that ruling. Now here comes the grandson talking inanities about the CAA without even knowing that the CAA does not affect Indian citizens at all. I have heard even not-so-erudite Muslim women tell a former high court judge, Kamal Pasha, the same thing, that is the CAA does not affect them, who are Indian citizens. Strictly speaking, the Supreme Court, sitting on a bunch of petitions against the CAA, since at least 2020, has no jurisdiction even to consider these petitions.
This is a indian secular version of grooming gang ….. for the judiciary of india.
'Hindu khatre mein hai' vipers lying again.
"It took 40 years to disown..." Lmao do you not know how cases are assigned to judges ? Or do you not know that unless until some petitioner or party challenges the said ruling in the court, the Court can not on its own overrule a precedent ? Aur bahut kaam hai Judiciary ke paas re baba. Jab bench ke saamne case aayega tab hi toh overrule hoga. Khaali nahi baithe hote judges ki pending cases ko side me rakh, already decided cases me hi ghuse rahe.
Also, what consequence to the senior judge are you expecting ? Former CJI had already left for heavenly abode. Plus, law and its understanding evolves. CJI Y V Chandrachud gave his opinion and judgment according to his understanding of law at that point of time and upon the arguments presented to him by the counsel in that case. The understanding of human rights of accused and arrested person have undergone a massive change since then. Just like the law of s3dition, the same SC which had earlier upheld the law of s3dition has now put it in abeyance.
Bhai internet sasta hai toh kuch bhi type karoge ?
Who is a hindu? Do they the aryans who came from the middle east including Iran? Are Dravidians part of the Hindus, because they are against Hindi ? 🤪
@@thewhatorwhyGet lost, you piece of excr*ment!
Your are absolutely correct sir that the religious sensitive matter will pave the way for feeding the communal Poision like RSS.
People call family system is in only politics.But it is also in Courts????
why he don't talk about wakf board. He is talking as a congress spokesman
Indeed his entire DNA is so
He is talking according to constitution.
Stop targeting particular community, WTH has happened to you people.
Why don't you guys understand the level of hatred the BJp has spread in society. If you are going against constitution, then you are indirectly going against the country. Stop being fools.
Waqf land is something.
Muslims janmi people left over.
That land belong waqf.
Also Left over masjid land abandoned muslim peoples land.
Which is used to masjid or muslim people land belong to waqf.
There no right hindu people to muslim hardworkingly made land
In India appointment of judges through collegium system like politics some families taking advantages. Nowhere in the world this type of system working.
Collegium should be booted put since it nourishes dynasty rule
He is also going to opt bakalat for getting benefit of collegium system.
सीधी बात, जिस संप्रदाय के लोगों ने मेरे देश का विभाजन करवाया वो वापस नही चाहिए।
While making law , not only logic ,truth and ideology is important , security of the country is most important. when we make any law there are controversies, ultimate special power must be given to president of India to take exceptional decisions to even over take existing laws to make it most flexible and powerfull
Then the President should be expert in laws, political science, Economics, ...etc. Can you show a person???...
That a long way to so say make President a dictator
We live in a country where an illegally border crossed woman is being interviewed by the media as a national crush.
@@chandrasekar3424 not necessary. There are ample legal luminaries available in India . Only genuine people with right mind of affection towards the society and patriotism towards India are wanted in the list for President. So selection of Presidential candidate among the chaos and confusions the current opposition paries has been difficult all along.(they are not opposition to ruling party alone but they are against the rightful wishes and ambitions of the common people of India) Now a patriotic Indian having common sense with patriotism having been selected steering the country's affairs for the benefit of common man's interest has become easy
There needs to be a change in the judiciary selection process. The present system is a highly biased nepotistic system.
Next step by the Govt should be judicial reforms.
The present system is not a fair system, made by judges, for judge families
Great minds like our PM and HM should appoint Judges. They are the source of wisdom. Present collegium lacks 'wisdom'.
👍🏻👍🏻
Jay Shah supporters talking about nepotism.😂😂
Absolutely ❤
What is the qualification of PM who can’t speak in English without teleprompter.
In 50 years there was no debate on 370 and wakf board 😅
What were the Supreme Court doing all these while
These lawyers and law students do not realize that not all laws are made in a society by the people now or in the past is fair to all. The laws are made to govern the country in the way the majority (in a democracy) or by the ruler (in kingdom or autocracy) wants. Nobody can guarantee a law to be fair to all. There is no point in fighting in a court about it and debating too much about it except for academic purposes of the law students. Court is not a place to make laws or policies. They are there only to interpret the law made by the people (parliament) and to enforce it. These days, we see courts trying to step outside their boundaries. People through their representatives (parliament) can over-ride any ruling of the court with appropriate majority, including amendment of the constitution, if needed.
Brilliant response..
Couldn't agree more, judiciary should act in it's boundry. I think it is very high time we need judicial reform in this country. We need accountability and transparency in judiciary.
This sounds like a high school classroom assignment speech.
This man is hilarious man without brain who is definitely going to become CJI in following years. Why this dumb is giving speech and not have a debate with J Sai Deepak or Rangnathan sir even Himanta Biswa Sharma is quite enough for his filthy childish argument 😂 matlab kuch v . It was well said in Swacha Bharat mission that "Khule me hugna band karo bhai band karo khule me jo hugega apna goon khaega"😂
Wo seekh rekha hai, like youvaraj Rahul.
🚩I thought middle school classroom debate: 😅
😂😂 somewhere its hurting you coz he is right
@@shaguftayasmeen665 no dumb can't hurts but HALALA hurts do you like it to done with son in law or father in law or brother in law etc
Hierarchy of judiciary never maintain impartial justice
Just because he is the grandson and son of so and so public platforms are made available.
I would love to see j saideepak and him debate on this issue
😂😂
This guy will give fitting reply to sai
J saideefuk will run away
I don't know why some people of this country (India) are sympathizing more more Muslim even after partition was made in 1947, If you so sympathetic why leaders of that time were allowed happen to so. Such people never recommend on Hindu's problem even today this will make the unpeaceful situation in the country.
You have to remember this... India is NOT a Hindu nation... India is a SECULAR COUNTRY...
Forget about all religions guys. please focus on science and technology.
Kaliyug has started and we cant expect these so called intellectual people to understand the criminals rather than supporting them....
Since America and dreamers was quoted,
when ppl enter us on work permits along with their spouse and children and have been in queue for 20 years to get a GC followed by Citizenship. But it takes less time to get asylum and GC followed by citizenship by entering illegally.
I dont understand the rational in incentivizing acting against the law.
Sounds like a college debate
collegium system doesnt exist elsewhere in the world! how convenient!... we heard applause....so there r more of these characters around
Group of thugs work in Indian judiciary.
Thank god the Judiciary has not become another stooge of the current regime. Intelligence and literacy has atleast not ruined one institution.
These are the Trojan Horses of the Indian Union working full time to help the Traitors and Terrorists
Seemed to me like there were no audience during the first part of his speech but it hit my mind that there were some brilliant minds present there when they started clapping at the "unconstitutionality"... Shows consciousness. Wow👂🤔
In India court can't give justice only power can give injustice easily😢
If you argue that under the constitution all should be treated equally, then why should there be opposition for UCC? Secondly the act is to provide citizenship for those that are tormented butchered across the border based on their religious belief. If so, what is wrong in providing citizenship for the tormented? Do you want the tormentor also to be weighed on the same scale? It is nothing but shear arrogance to apply secularism here. This man will make a better politician and a lawyer with no moral standing
If this guy becomes CJI, then we are done. SC has already become a joke. These days SC's interfere in daily business. Which is really weird because that is not their job.
What about Jews, atheist, agnostic, ahmadis. They are also facing persecution
@@abhijeetjawlekar3216 atheist and agnostic are not persecuted. They could be persecuted but they aren't. Even if they are, that's a very very small amount. But Jews are not persecuted anymore. Those who are living in India never faced persecution and attacks and racism. They are living a healthy life.
Ahmadiya are Muslims, they have 57 countries to choose from where they wanna go.
Still they are allowed to get Indian citizenship through a regular citizenship portal.
@@ayushbhattacharjee9879 If government do shit. SC has to wipe it naa..
@@sakshamjain9494 okay name one thing the govt has done which needs supreme court's intervention.
The government brings a law which has been passed from the parliament and, now these days, The SC tries to intervene into everything, every bill that is being passed.
Spot some light on =
1. Why minority status in a secular state
2. Why muslim personal law in a secular state
3. Why only criminal law is uniform
4. Why waqf board
5. Why only hindu mandir is under gvt control.
6. Why only terririst has human right but not for soldier.
7. Ask your father n grand father regarding slow n pending judicial process
8. Answer if judges can appoint next judge then PM also can elect next favourable PM ....?
9. You are from a judicial family, why your father n grand father couldn't expedite the judicial process, and remove corruption in judiciary.
10. Are judical elite class fearful of perticular religion, they tend to bash one particular religion ?
What u say It's correct 💯
I’m sure you will find answers in books if you wanna read.
Correct 💯
@@raffu2129u won’t
Valid point you rose!, i also thought one thing i thought why judiciary not aware earlier (Before Modiji)
Why they argue now
Is this valid??
He is advocating for the people who divided this country on the basis of religion and went to pakistan then because of the reality in there had to come back comparing with the people who had to run with their life and being raped. This is the difference between true ground conditions and western university knowledge... Same like his father….
They can comeback, if they can come with the land they took!!
Just like his father legacy at the cost of national interest.
You are right
Brilliantly pointed out ! 👍✨💥
These kind of recruited people are the real enemies of common people
The kalyug where well spoken, "intellectual rākshasas" will emerge has began and you should be prepared to face them.
He should be sent to argue the case of Shamima Begum who has denied citizenship by UK
Selective memory approach and smart strategy of going in detail on the history and when it comes to the crux of the issue of CAA he smartly switch to selective memory approach to prove his stand....
Big shame educated people like him do so.
CAA is only talking about people who are already in before 2014 end which makes half of his argument senseless and it is nothing to do with any of our existing citizen's.
Shame to see major media house like India today is giving him visibility by reposting it with negative agenda ...Sad😢
He finds cut off date itself arbitrary and wrong, how? It took all who came seeking shelter so that no one misses the chance they have under specially enacted law that too on one time basis if so what's wrong? He is speaking the language of Lutyens, Islamists, evangelists and LeLis. Idiot, rather criminal.
Well said! 👍👏
why i should give my Job to them
The Constitution gives rights not RSS
I am ashamed that *English-writing* people like you lack basic common sense to Understand Logical arguments. Shame.
He is clever about how to skip the main theme of CAA.
So you know everything sir/madam...please explain through video like this yaar
main theme is just Anti-muslim, so to gather the votes of tanatani's
@@mshoaib9531 Why are you thinking like that. Read the Nehru -Liakat pact in details. Hope you get my points.
They have drawn the authority and fundamental rights to speak authoritatively on any subject of national interest ?
Respected gentleman, please explain the Genocide in the Kashmir in 1990? Why supreme court refuse to register case on that.
3:09 wah 😂.. I just laughed n stopped watching
Have read that letter?
now judges have started this. why dont u buy a country and take everybody there. u will have that kind of money, i bet.
He is a citizen of this great country and Freedom of speech allows him to say it. Or do you think because he is the CJI's son, he cant ? When an amendment is being made to the CONSTITUTION, a discussion of all of it's merits and flaws is warranted. Not all of us think the BJP is infallible.
He has no constitutional authority. 😂
@@realnapster1522
He is not exercising any constitutional authority. He's stating his views/opinions on the bill.
As of now he is an advocate not a judge
The great analysis made by this young 🧒 Indian. 🙏🏿 I appreciate his dairing to talk about this very much confused law. Now every Indian inclusive librto and Rahul gaunge will be satisfied or not. This is pusseled.
But I am with this new CAA of BJP. No any muslim is allowed to come in India 🇮🇳
Every one can give surman and can day an Act passed by Parliament can be question. I think he is also wants belike his father.
very good knowledge of laws which not needed to live peacefully in Bharatha, you are more fit to USA or UK, even better in Pakistan.
@manacinemaadda3785 - like NRO bakths?
The issue and the speech are different. The citizenship amendment act is to provide protection to a certain group of people with different backgrounds. There are some exclusions of people in it because of very valid reasons. The law filter out a few because they took their share of and settled other countries . Those countries are the aliens of India and met many conflicts. As you are well aware that the j&k law did not allow any Indian to get marry a Kashmiri and stay there. J&k was in India and operated under Indian law. Where were all this preachers of apostolic scholars in 1990 , when the Kashmiri Pandits were persecuted and thrown out from their native place. What had happened to the scholars since then. Why did the Hon. Supreme Court obviously kept silent.
The protection of law is the duty of court but the protection of court ,the state and the citizens shall be prime responsibility of the executive where in judiciary has no say . The parliament has power to make law in accordance with the constitution and the vested sovereignty.