CJI Shocked Sibal Remark ; Hindu Came Not Muslims "

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 มี.ค. 2024
  • CJI Shocked Sibal Remark ; Hindu Came Not Muslims " #lawchakra #analysis #supremecourtofindia
    #SeniorAdvocateKapilSibal Represent Assam NRC
    Follow us on Twitter:- / lawchakra
    Follow us on Whatsapp : whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5...
    Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
    Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
    #Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
    Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
    Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
    Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
    For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
    #SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
    #Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
    *This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
    🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
    @Lawchakra
    👉Twitter
    / lawchakra
    👉 Instagram.
    / lawchakras
    📑*Fair Use Policy -*
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @debajitkumardas8649
    @debajitkumardas8649 หลายเดือนก่อน +4608

    Let Sibbal go and live in any Muslim dominated areas within India!
    Hope, he'd be able to live freely

    • @khyatikothari4492
      @khyatikothari4492 หลายเดือนก่อน +142

      Outside india. As per his argument if Pakistan and Bangladesh Muslims should be accepted in India, am sure he should be happily accepted in these countries

    • @Richi.-rich
      @Richi.-rich หลายเดือนก่อน +216

      Send him to old city in Hyderabad. He will forget all the arguments

    • @ginnip8670
      @ginnip8670 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

      He will go to tihar someday

    • @user-vi4jy4yo2v
      @user-vi4jy4yo2v หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      @@khyatikothari4492and we shall send u to Uganda 🇺🇬

    • @elborrador333
      @elborrador333 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

      @@najmulhaque3716 How can truth send bad message. He is only speaking truth.

  • @tanaystudies
    @tanaystudies หลายเดือนก่อน +690

    Repeating The Well Said Quote :
    "Sound Is Measured In Decibels, Nonsense Is Measured In Kapilsibals".

    • @rajumandal9408
      @rajumandal9408 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      😂..

    • @deepikam7731
      @deepikam7731 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who said this.

    • @MS-ov9sv
      @MS-ov9sv หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😂😂😂😂

    • @Sargeras05
      @Sargeras05 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @satraj2815
      @satraj2815 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂

  • @natarajanb1905
    @natarajanb1905 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    Sibbal is arguing exactly the opposite of what he argued in Art.370. At that time he argued that Kashmir has its own culture language etc which shouldn't be diluted and now he says states shouldn't object if their demography changes.

    • @secularmama
      @secularmama หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is doing his job , he paid for that

    • @purabi123
      @purabi123 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That is what lawyers do.

    • @secularmama
      @secularmama 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@purabi123 Yes, Lawyers are only ones who can professionaly lie legally.

  • @vanshikamudgil8255
    @vanshikamudgil8255 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Our country was divided on the basis of religion, now you cannot question us when we protect those who were left behind.

  • @nandlalsingh644
    @nandlalsingh644 หลายเดือนก่อน +3014

    Sibal is talking nonsense . Hindu Bengali and other ethnic Hindu minorities wanted to migrate to India and not Muslim.

    • @tim069
      @tim069 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      lol

    • @kamalchauhan5470
      @kamalchauhan5470 หลายเดือนก่อน +187

      ​@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pnbcoz of religious persecussion in bangladesh

    • @shivshankarchoubey1871
      @shivshankarchoubey1871 หลายเดือนก่อน +170

      ​@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pnBecause this is their right, when the country was divided in the name of religion, then all Hindus are citizens of India, not you.

    • @indraneelsarkar85902
      @indraneelsarkar85902 หลายเดือนก่อน +131

      ​@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pn Because Muslims already have 57 countries but Hindus not and a piece of land as a beg had already been gifted to Muslims and this is the country of Hindus only.

    • @Sam-hu3cw
      @Sam-hu3cw หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      ​@@indraneelsarkar85902because India is democratic and secular country that doesn't represent any religion ..
      By your logic Sikh and other minorities should have their own country isn't it 🤡

  • @desi_patriot
    @desi_patriot หลายเดือนก่อน +1085

    How much hatred Sibal has for Hindus... It shocks my mind to no end

    • @aries5534
      @aries5534 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kapil sibal is just a puppet, he reports to Congress high command which hates Hindus to the core

    • @7vj7ik
      @7vj7ik หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Not hindus, only andaybhakt

    • @israelimanashe8608
      @israelimanashe8608 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      ​@@7vj7ik and you are Chatukaar 😅

    • @7vj7ik
      @7vj7ik หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@israelimanashe8608 tu bi 🤣🤣

    • @Nanded12345
      @Nanded12345 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      He hates Hindus not andhbhakt ​@@7vj7ik

  • @HUMShaBaK
    @HUMShaBaK หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I am happy all of this is now live and we can listen and know what goes in the minds of these people.. sic

  • @tarapadapyne6779
    @tarapadapyne6779 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    Every time he loses, but he keeps fighting against India, to keep his job intact.

  • @lakshminarayan6234
    @lakshminarayan6234 หลายเดือนก่อน +703

    Enemies within are more treacherous than the Enemy at the gates.

    • @jj-yi1ne
      @jj-yi1ne หลายเดือนก่อน

      who are you in this world?

    • @DJ-hl4xd
      @DJ-hl4xd หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      ​@@jj-yi1newhat point you trying to make by asking who is he....what is he saying is completely fact.... people who are celebrating the funeral of a terrorist or mafia....are always be a enemy for country

    • @skbachoti
      @skbachoti หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      This guy is typical of Congress mindset. Why blame him? He was born & brought up there in Congress.

    • @farhanikhat284
      @farhanikhat284 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So u consider the minority muslims ur enemy?

    • @SaveManWoman
      @SaveManWoman หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You sound like you don’t like facts.

  • @Anmathews
    @Anmathews หลายเดือนก่อน +1534

    Kapil Sybil is not aware that East Pakistan was already another country in 1971.

    • @deeptinair2914
      @deeptinair2914 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Bangladesh

    • @mrigazoa
      @mrigazoa หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      East Pakistan formed in 1947 , in 1971 Bangladesh is formed.

    • @sayan890
      @sayan890 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      He knows but lying is his habit

    • @iankiii
      @iankiii หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      He knows but just trying to confuse The judges

    • @faizanshaikh2025
      @faizanshaikh2025 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aagaya antimuslim

  • @archanasaxena5328
    @archanasaxena5328 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    कपिल जी से पूछना चाहिए कि हिन्दु कहां से आये थे,महाभारत,रामायण से मिल रहे सबूत क्या बताते है इसलिए आपका वक्तव्य तथ्य हीन है

    • @rajagopalnair7897
      @rajagopalnair7897 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said

    • @antxaveace
      @antxaveace หลายเดือนก่อน

      1:00 Mahabharata and Ramayana are mythical . The two mythical stories were written by the Aryans who had passed into India through Khyber pass from the steppes of Iran and who were nomads , to facilitate themselves to show that they are the superior race . Do not juxtapose Hinduism with those two mythical stories. The coinage ' Hindu ' came into existence about 200 years , more particularly after the entry into the Indian shores - the East India Company. 😊😊😊

  • @manjuufoodcreations369
    @manjuufoodcreations369 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    क्या बात कर रहे हैं यह साहब ?? अंग्रेजी में दलील करी तो किसी को समझेगा नहीं क्या?? हम कायदा अनपढ है फिर भी समजते हैं, यह अब और बेवकूफ नहीं बना सकते.. CJI साहब के सहनशीलता को प्रणाम 🙏🏻

    • @tarunverma744
      @tarunverma744 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ye sab humko bewkuf banate hai jo aam aadmi smjh ske waisi bhasha kyu nahi apnate , justice sirf bde logo aur paise walo ki hai English bolne walo ki hai

  • @aanandkumaar7800
    @aanandkumaar7800 หลายเดือนก่อน +1077

    East Pakistanis were Indians till 1971? Wow! What an argument!! Speechless...

    • @induchopra3014
      @induchopra3014 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

      Confidently lying. They created Pakistan. They werePakistanis . Not indians. They were foreigners. Or why india was divided? They didn't want to be Indians. They consider being muslim their identity. They dont consider being bengali or indian their identity. Why two nation theory if they considered themselves Indians? Explain

    • @nihalchandarora
      @nihalchandarora หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      Foolish argument absolutely wasteing valuable time of Hon'ble SC

    • @baldbonkers7246
      @baldbonkers7246 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Badti Umar ke sath insaan thoda sanak jaata hai, whi horaha hai

    • @DAILYSHORTS101
      @DAILYSHORTS101 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@baldbonkers7246 🤣🤣

    • @dvdv183
      @dvdv183 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Funny argument.. if they are to be considered as Indians, then can we take back the whole Pakistan ? including the land.. if so, I think we can agree.. same with West Bengal too..

  • @swamyguptadogiparthi7993
    @swamyguptadogiparthi7993 หลายเดือนก่อน +863

    Sibal with all his antihindu mindset,tried to put forth his arguments in such a convincing way that nobody can deny..but ,CJI is equally strongly putting forth his points..a decent way to stop the anti hindu undercurrent..hats of to you sir 💐💐

    • @indianmilitary
      @indianmilitary หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      Sibal is simply bullshitting (again) using word salad. Articulate but still bullshit

    • @treesajohnson6321
      @treesajohnson6321 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Sibal. is not anti-Hindu however, he is a learned knowledgeable Hindu and very well aware of India and its History.

    • @crusaders581
      @crusaders581 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@treesajohnson6321but he is underestimating the populace....this can cause riots..where mikkions of minorities will massacred ...no one can stop public.

    • @utkarshsingh7638
      @utkarshsingh7638 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      He's not anti hindu, just another guy chasing the money.

    • @umwelten988
      @umwelten988 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Convincing ❌ conniving ✔️

  • @IamforHinduism
    @IamforHinduism หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Hats off to our CJI. .. point to point counter citing constitution.. where as Sibal takks about Historical points..

  • @pkc3552
    @pkc3552 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    CJI is humbly requested not give any hearing of Adv Sibal

  • @buildthemvp
    @buildthemvp หลายเดือนก่อน +270

    He should be charged for wasting precious time of the court. Old guy has gone nuts.

  • @gdjoshijabalpur
    @gdjoshijabalpur หลายเดือนก่อน +725

    सिब्बल को हिंदू विरोधी और देश विरोधी बयानों के लिये सभी न्यायालयों में क्यों नहीं प्रतिबंधित कर दिया जाना चाहिए।

    • @arunaryankavu8298
      @arunaryankavu8298 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He knows this

    • @H2B2D
      @H2B2D หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Court bhi liberalism aur secularism ke naam per Hinduo se bhed-bhaav karta hai.

    • @sonagarg2871
      @sonagarg2871 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@H2B2Dसिर्फ़ बीजेपी को वोट दो वो सारा कचरा साफ़ कर देगी ।एकदम सब कुछ वो नहीं कर सकती ,लेकिन अगले पाँच सालो में देश में बड़े बड़े बदलाव होने तय है ।

    • @s9820309493
      @s9820309493 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Need guts or both R one coin ❓

    • @tksinha6007
      @tksinha6007 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      माननीय टीम के चुनाव माननीय ही करते हैं

  • @bharatjoshi4140
    @bharatjoshi4140 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    All this debate shows that a lawyer can present the facts in either ways, according to the case he is advocating for !! Such people like Kapil sibal are above their consciousness !!

  • @sateeshpothu4320
    @sateeshpothu4320 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Enemies within the country are more dangerous than external enemies.. Like him siblu

  • @padminisekhar6070
    @padminisekhar6070 หลายเดือนก่อน +579

    Sibal should never be allowed to practice as lawyer.

    • @ajaysolanki2497
      @ajaysolanki2497 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂

    • @ujjwalrai7517
      @ujjwalrai7517 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why?

    • @SR-ku3ud
      @SR-ku3ud หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      WTF is he saying - 'they were Indians in 1971?????

    • @dkm5691
      @dkm5691 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100% correct. Through out from court Y CJI LISTENING HIS WORD

    • @kvrao-ol9fy
      @kvrao-ol9fy หลายเดือนก่อน

      His practice should be cancelled.

  • @babucherian8419
    @babucherian8419 หลายเดือนก่อน +445

    Sibal is going out of his mind. I totally bewildered by his statements.

    • @Shubham-pr9cq
      @Shubham-pr9cq หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pakistan ka matlab kya la ilaha illallah
      The point is what is Bengali
      After the forming of Pakistan then Bangladesh occur

    • @induchopra3014
      @induchopra3014 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      If they considered themselves bengalis, why partition happened? They were Muslims first
      No they were not indians

    • @softpick1096
      @softpick1096 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He has to do something for the fund he received from the jihadis, at least bark

    • @Userykp
      @Userykp หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@induchopra3014 if bangladeshis r bengalis then pakistanis r punjabis -- then whats the need for another country? He is arguing comparing language to country 🙄.

  • @rajagopalnair7897
    @rajagopalnair7897 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Sibal will change his father for money. He must barred to enter courts across the country.

    • @JohnnyRotten-uf6xw
      @JohnnyRotten-uf6xw หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's undemocratic and against free speech.

    • @JohnnyRotten-uf6xw
      @JohnnyRotten-uf6xw หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a comedy show, if we silence him, life would become too boring.

  • @__Leo_0123
    @__Leo_0123 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What about the Muslims stayed back in 1947 and not send to Pak under the agreement of populatin exchange

  • @m.r.r8408
    @m.r.r8408 หลายเดือนก่อน +890

    This man Sibal thinks that we are all fools! He is trying to confuse the justices by mangling the Indian constitution and history!

    • @smitaswarup8562
      @smitaswarup8562 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You do not know, Const is a living one. It is to be studied in context of history and circumstances. You people need to have a civics lesson. Sibal is a grt constl expert.

    • @ikp5159
      @ikp5159 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      How will CJ get confused..he will not..he knows Sibal very well

    • @udayhotshot
      @udayhotshot หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      ​@@smitaswarup8562and yet he lost the argument ... you people should understand constitution is the for the people of India not for the people who made decision at 1947 ... if they want to enter into India ... only GOI has the almighty power to decide ... not Sibal or SC its a simple understanding

    • @arpanchuddlers
      @arpanchuddlers หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      leave bhai. you can't argue with people who only follow what one book says...@@udayhotshot

    • @philominapc7859
      @philominapc7859 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ikp5159😂😂😂

  • @saimeera3537
    @saimeera3537 หลายเดือนก่อน +179

    Sir you are enough for us. We don't need enemies outside of India.

    • @sbanj
      @sbanj หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Don't call him Sir. He don't deserve any respect.

    • @diadon5674
      @diadon5674 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I agree

  • @achtungc99
    @achtungc99 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I just didn't have patience to hear his argument... Kudos to the judges that they heard him and didn't throw him out of the court

  • @shanu7uday
    @shanu7uday หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    7:50 "1971 was second partition of India" सिब्बल बोला 😂😅😂😅😂😅😝🤪😜🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅

  • @RajeshDogar
    @RajeshDogar หลายเดือนก่อน +511

    Sibbal has no words to say. He is beating about bush.

    • @Somd55
      @Somd55 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Beating around the bush.

    • @abhilashjha6281
      @abhilashjha6281 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Somd55typo hoga bhai..

    • @smitaswarup8562
      @smitaswarup8562 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do not know, Const is a living one. It is to be studied in context of history and circumstances. You people need to have a civics lesson. Sibal is a grt constl expert.

    • @2000superayush
      @2000superayush หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​​@@smitaswarup8562copy pasting the same comment sans any logic. He's trying to give the constitutional rights to immigrants on the grounds of undivided India? He is talking utter nonsense. There was east Pakistan already in existence prior to 1971. And ofc he's throwing the Assam accord out of the window. Fool!

    • @sanjeevanipaediatric951
      @sanjeevanipaediatric951 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He is trying for Law Jihad

  • @srikrishnauniversalvlogs
    @srikrishnauniversalvlogs หลายเดือนก่อน +697

    This type of lawyers very dangerous to country....

    • @shasha2022-bo5yw
      @shasha2022-bo5yw หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      He is good but not sangi

    • @sigma_sniper6141
      @sigma_sniper6141 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@shasha2022-bo5yw he is traitor Mf

    • @Bishnu_Deb
      @Bishnu_Deb หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      @@shasha2022-bo5yw he is not sanghi and he is supported by anti Hindu mindset. This is a shameful fact.

    • @riturajsanketh7635
      @riturajsanketh7635 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What have you understood by the discussion adhe bhakt

    • @faizanshaikh2025
      @faizanshaikh2025 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Kyu ki yeh lawyer muslim se nafrat nhi krte na. Jo muslim ko support karega wo dangerous. Jo muslim se nafrat karega wo accha

  • @ajitkumarpanigrahi6090
    @ajitkumarpanigrahi6090 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I never thought in "supreme court" also lawyers present blabbered answers as we do in viva when not prepared

  • @TouchBillion
    @TouchBillion หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is not court room, this is lecture hall😂😂
    Only lecture , no any questions & answers😂

  • @hradaykantsaraiya5808
    @hradaykantsaraiya5808 หลายเดือนก่อน +297

    I am an Indian. I became American citizen . I surrender my Indian passport . Now I want to come back to India. Now I will have to apply for Indian citizenship. Then it is up to Indian government to decide whether to give me citizenship or not. Same thing apply to all other foreigners.

    • @Rahul_Singh100
      @Rahul_Singh100 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Its not the same thing... You left the country ... The people being denied citizenship in the region of Bengal underwent partition and bore becoming refugee against their will.

    • @Rahul_Singh100
      @Rahul_Singh100 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      If you dont have common sense enough to comprehenx what is being discussed, dont blabber ur mouth.

    • @kamalrathod25
      @kamalrathod25 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      It's different because many could not come to India during partition... India's partition was declared overnight and many could not come back to India. It is accepted by Congress themselves it was a blunder ...MMS himself said in parliament we must do something for the minority in Pakistan...congress sometime forgets what they spoke in past 😅

    • @Sakshameditz27
      @Sakshameditz27 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​​@@Rahul_Singh100 In constitution of India it is written that people that came during partition can have refugees citizenship but in this remark by sibal he state that India partition took place on 14 August and only Pakistan got independent but Bangladesh citizens can have right to move to Indian which is wrong it is written in treaty that Bangladesh will join Pakistani which contradiction the statement by sibbal

    • @indianhistoryarchaeology
      @indianhistoryarchaeology หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Sakshameditz27 Bangladesh became East Pakistan on 14 August, 1947 and the Partition of Bengal was possibly worse than that of Punjab. Trainloads of Hindus were being massacred and many were too scared to cross the border as news of violence in West Bengal was equally bad. Also, as in Sindh some were too poor to even attempt to walk across the land and cross the border. But Sibal is deliberately muddling the facts by saying that Bangladesh became an independent country in 1971 and therefore was part of united India before that. During this period we did get a large influx of migrants from East Pakistan who were escaping the Pakistan army and they got assimilated among the "minority" community in India.

  • @ashmax3411
    @ashmax3411 หลายเดือนก่อน +307

    When u have traitors within ur own country then u dont need any enemy from outside...sibbal is an example

    • @Shivamsharma_cgly
      @Shivamsharma_cgly หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mat bhulo Electoral Bond ko inhone hi expose kiya hai.

    • @nerdy_v4x
      @nerdy_v4x หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Shivamsharma_cgly to hindu ko target karne ka hak mil gya kya ise fir??

    • @radhikakumar2331
      @radhikakumar2331 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly!!

    • @samarsengupta8205
      @samarsengupta8205 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Shivamsharma_cgly 47% BJP other have 53% so if it's unethical then why not other refused all donation?
      BJP national party have 6k+ cr and 2nd one who in only one state have they have 1.6k+ cr.
      Before it cash was scam brother.

    • @kishorkotbage
      @kishorkotbage หลายเดือนก่อน

      👌👌👌👌very well said 👍👍👍

  • @seemasachdeva921
    @seemasachdeva921 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Ghar ke dushman, bahar ke dushman se zyada khatarnaak hote hei.

  • @m.k.basanth168
    @m.k.basanth168 หลายเดือนก่อน +625

    CJI shud have thrown this Sibal endemic out of the court. Listening to this man's blasphemy is a waste of court's time.

    • @Shubham-pr9cq
      @Shubham-pr9cq หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Bhai sahab don't forget about direct action day
      Pakistan ka matlab kya la ilaha illallah

    • @vedprakashsonthalia4490
      @vedprakashsonthalia4490 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CJI and sibbal are birds of the same feathers. Any thing that appears otherwise is smokescreen to hoodwink viewers to affect difference of opinion

    • @arifabd
      @arifabd หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Are you sure you don't like him because of logic, or because of inexplicable hatred towards a group ?

    • @Shubham-pr9cq
      @Shubham-pr9cq หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Bhai dekh simple baat hai please look at the electoral capacity of Muslim league when it got elected in 1940s 98.4 % vote
      Then then their claims which got converted into mosque
      Then dear majority areas where they have their own personal management
      In three districts of India there are no Hindu and Hindu rituals are allowed
      Then I don't know where are you from but if you are from Bengal then you must have remembered that how the Sultan of Bengal played with virgin women
      The same way sandesh Khali happened
      Kerala is the very secular state that because they celebrate olam you have to eat beef
      When people are doing it then it shows the problem within it
      I am not saying Muslim the bad but 85% of the population of Muslims want their laws
      Then how they throw a stone that Hindu festivals
      So if you think that then why should not be take Pakistan Afghanistan and Afghanistan Muslim and Bangladesh Muslims this is the same reason because they have separated from a bike killing our people
      Hindu Shahi rulers of Afghanistan
      Sindhi and Punjabi of Pakistan
      Bangladeshi Hindu the treating like dust
      Sorry but we have lo st so much of a territory we don't want to lose another

    • @shubhasahai6933
      @shubhasahai6933 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@arifabdgive 10 honest reson not to doubt you people. Book teaching everybody knows truth.

  • @user-qc7fi1ln8t
    @user-qc7fi1ln8t หลายเดือนก่อน +167

    These types of hipocratic lawyers are dangerous for our country. He is not a lawyer, but a liar

    • @nowwhat6716
      @nowwhat6716 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do U mean cji.they seems to agree at the end.

    • @RaviKumar-hy6xe
      @RaviKumar-hy6xe หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      bring sudanshu trivedi against sibal. sibal might be moghal son, they forget to take him, now lets hindhus become shivaji, and send him out of india. partition was done on religion india is hindhu country.

  • @ushatea
    @ushatea หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good dicison by tha suprime cort

  • @nikhileshmanchi2196
    @nikhileshmanchi2196 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    all supreme court hearings should be put in
    public domain each and every hearing

  • @Kafir_Hindu
    @Kafir_Hindu หลายเดือนก่อน +388

    My lord, Sibbal has gone mad, his place is in mental asylum and not in the court.

    • @salamindia5148
      @salamindia5148 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Sanghis,
      Bajrang Dal, Moblyncher, Tadipaar have place in court!!!

    • @Kafir_Hindu
      @Kafir_Hindu หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      @@salamindia5148 yes, and the butchers of humanity who kill others in name of BHAICHARA behind the bars of the prison 😂🤔😂

    • @iamYashodeep
      @iamYashodeep หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      ​@@salamindia5148religion of pieces spreading piece in Russia..

    • @RohitSharma12542
      @RohitSharma12542 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Ambedkar ji ne kaha h ki ysdi bharat kabhi hindu rastra nahi ban sakta...yadi esa hota h to wo desh ka durbhagya hoga
      Kyuki Hindu dharm me lengik bhedbhav jatigat bhedbhav h samanta nahi h
      Samvidhan nirmata ambedkar ji ❤❤

    • @kelano728
      @kelano728 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@salamindia5148rohinga😂

  • @pn0409
    @pn0409 หลายเดือนก่อน +426

    Lately Kapil Sibbal developed a habbit of taking every case to Supreme Court, whether constitutional or unconstitutional, and waste courts time.
    He should be barred from practicing and must be thrown out of govt residence too.

    • @raptor6104
      @raptor6104 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      He is getting paid by Pappu

    • @n.s.karanth1381
      @n.s.karanth1381 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yes, he cultivated a strong affiliation with Supreme Court
      The Court can't function without pleader like Sibal and Singhvi, the collective charm, mindset has come to this point

    • @saniaparveen7957
      @saniaparveen7957 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hindus also wasting time of court by bringing unnecessary allegations of existence of hindu temples every where, we have better things to look into, but no according to your shraddha every Muslim house are built on a temple 👌👌

    • @ptbb23
      @ptbb23 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Why is supreme court entertaining these cases. Tells a lot about CJI himself

    • @raptor6104
      @raptor6104 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ptbb23 Bro...if he is against these type of time wasting cases....Pappus will cry and again "protest" again across India saying democracy died because no one is fighting for their illiterate views

  • @anshuraj3628
    @anshuraj3628 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have to watch this in full video for better understanding.

  • @angshuhaldar5473
    @angshuhaldar5473 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is the case of optimum utilisation of courts time

  • @a.p.rajupillai7675
    @a.p.rajupillai7675 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    he never argues with legal methods, he only confuses and irreverent things and make people to forget the original case

  • @bharatakhand-qr1kb
    @bharatakhand-qr1kb หลายเดือนก่อน +236

    I belong to the same ethnicity of Mr. Sibbal and Indian also like sibbal. So I am son of Mr Sibbal. Kindly give me your whole wealth now bcz I am your legal heir😊

    • @zeroalpha4818
      @zeroalpha4818 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      perfect point

    • @karthikpriyabalakrishnan2551
      @karthikpriyabalakrishnan2551 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Perfect superb sibal should know this 👏👏👏👌👌👌👌👌

    • @actualangel5133
      @actualangel5133 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Wonderful point.👌👌👌

    • @No-Homo
      @No-Homo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Logic 🔥🔥

    • @hemantachandra6962
      @hemantachandra6962 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rightly-put

  • @skipper5070
    @skipper5070 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tough subject, due to invaders since 800 years looting, plundering and forcing Sanstani Hindus to convert.

  • @chaitanyak4455
    @chaitanyak4455 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ignoring the prejudices, Such high level intellectual discussions. The winner is the democracy in India 🫡

  • @user-zt5si1lc4j
    @user-zt5si1lc4j หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    Sibal is very confident that We bhartiye people are fools, With the elected govts of Congress in the past he settled this idea in his mind 😮

    • @induchopra3014
      @induchopra3014 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He thinks he alone knows history. Which Bangladeshis consider himself indian? Zero

  • @user-zo7lu8rn1s
    @user-zo7lu8rn1s หลายเดือนก่อน +186

    The supreme court is very patient to hear Kapil Sibal

    • @nareshsharma6526
      @nareshsharma6526 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both are part of the eco system established by Congress and left.

    • @janvijaysingh2692
      @janvijaysingh2692 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes they of course, they should... And after all, Sibal's making valid points that the preservation and safeguard of a regional culture from immigration is not a right in India (although this is the guy who used to vouch and simp for the Article 370)
      My point is, the parliament should make a new right for preservation of culture... Tab dekhte hai ye kya bolte hai 🙃

    • @hrishabhjoshi5847
      @hrishabhjoshi5847 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@janvijaysingh2692He isn't making valid points, after 1947 there was Pakistan and India. After 1971 there was Pakistan, Bangladesh and India so those people are of different nationality not Indians.

    • @janvijaysingh2692
      @janvijaysingh2692 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hrishabhjoshi5847 I don't think so you even watched the video. What I'm talking about is migration within India. As such, people of other regions of India move into a state, thus gaining a stake in the say in the state's politics and policies. This also conflicts with the predominant culture in those states, as immigrants bring in their own culture.
      And we Indians are tought in 7th or 8th grade, about the right to migration within the country...
      Some north eastern states do have 6th Schedule, but several others don't. Even States like Ladakh, J&K, Uttarakhand, Himanchal don't have any such safeguard. And thus Sibal's right in saying that there's no legal grounds for a state (most states) or its community to plead to court about preventing influx of migrants from any part of India (though he's pretty wrong when saying that Bangladeshis have a right to migrate within India+Bangladesh, its pretty funny😂)

  • @JayapalMK
    @JayapalMK หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sibal please understand the difference between undivided India and present India... only fundamental rights applicable to the citizens of India

  • @nipunkothare
    @nipunkothare หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    These people ruled our country for decades. The system was so rotten, no wonder India was so behind. Not anymore.

  • @naiksa1
    @naiksa1 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    I have never seen a hypocrite lawyer like Sibal, he change his argument as per his suitability. Ask for J&K he will change immediately.

    • @prachim_
      @prachim_ หลายเดือนก่อน

      Advocacy is literally representing your client’s stance.

    • @shubhamhirave3772
      @shubhamhirave3772 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@prachim_😂

    • @catfish9391
      @catfish9391 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@prachim_yeh client stance kiska banagldeshi logon ne isko hire kiya hai

    • @Delllatitude7490
      @Delllatitude7490 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@prachim_ Client's stance? here he is trying to deny the Petitionare by using his twisted logic of, Assam should not blame it's dilution of culture on demographic change while in Art 370 case, he said demographic change will destroy thr J&K culture. it's hypocracy more than anything else

    • @prachim_
      @prachim_ 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Delllatitude7490 he's arguing for the side he is representing. That is what advocacy is. Exactly how A criminal lawyer may represent prosecution in one case and the defendant in the other. He does not become a hypocrite for using the same logic to his own end.

  • @HarshVerma-tm5od
    @HarshVerma-tm5od หลายเดือนก่อน +211

    And that person was once law minister of india

    • @liveandletlive9046
      @liveandletlive9046 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      It was a bad joke for our country. He spoiled everything with his dirty mind

    • @sobhanapm4617
      @sobhanapm4617 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      😂😂

    • @RaviSingh-jo6pr
      @RaviSingh-jo6pr หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Even he himself know that he is beating about bush. But he want to continue to dabate on topic and money will continue to flow in form of his fees 😂

    • @induchopra3014
      @induchopra3014 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Shocking

    • @diadon5674
      @diadon5674 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What a nightmare that must be !!

  • @hrishabhjoshi5847
    @hrishabhjoshi5847 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Kapil sibal is the reason, India needs to careful with enemies within our country.

  • @girishbhavsar
    @girishbhavsar 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    2:47 The same is applicable to Kashmir also.

  • @godinallcreatures3539
    @godinallcreatures3539 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    Sibal misled Congress on 2G,Educatioal policy and now CAA, dont waste court time and confuse the issue just to prolonge.

  • @bharatiadhatrao8696
    @bharatiadhatrao8696 หลายเดือนก่อน +394

    I was shacked with the kapil sibbal arguments, when he said they means Bangladeshi were Indians. Even the CJI Raised the same question. Before 1971, it was east Pakistan, and not India.,which was partioned in 1947. Immigrants before 1971 are migrated from east Pakistan, then how can they be Indians. On 16th Dec 1971 Bangladesh was formed.

    • @tarunmedi
      @tarunmedi หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Sibballs argument is gold ..and very deep...cji initially didn't get it..

    • @user-zf4un4mx2l
      @user-zf4un4mx2l หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Fool sibal may argue that there's no Hindus ever

    • @bhavishdhankar1943
      @bhavishdhankar1943 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      it was east pakistan

    • @humbleh5085
      @humbleh5085 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      How can sibbal say that before Bangladesh formed, they were Indians. They were East Pakistanis before becoming Bangladeshis.

    • @tarunmedi
      @tarunmedi หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@humbleh5085 they were forced to be East Pakistani...when India and Pakistan seperated their was great influx of Bengali speaking Hindus as well as Muslims from east pakistan...but government was forced to issue permit for Muslims coming to India ..only 2000 permits were released per month ..while before those permits 25000+ Muslims were moving to India...while Hindus had no restrictions...they all were Bengali first ... and they didn't know Urdu ...one reason why east and Pakistan seperated was because of imposition of Urdu over east pakistan giving people of west pakistan unnecessary advantage...thats another reason why South India opposes imposition of Hindi over them.

  • @JSR5362
    @JSR5362 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    How sibble became Advocate😅😅😅

  • @praveenmenon5869
    @praveenmenon5869 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He told the truth.. So some soft corner will be there towards the ancestral atmosphere..

  • @nshivashankar1533
    @nshivashankar1533 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Honourable justice is rightly questioning They can migrate only in India, not from other country….

  • @djbabudharmi371
    @djbabudharmi371 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Sibal wasted SC time in article 370. Now here too in CAA is wasting. How CJI is permitted such arguments to take place? He should be barred from bar

    • @FirstLast-vr5gh
      @FirstLast-vr5gh หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bar council and not from bar. Woh bar, bar bar jaye. Hamen kaa haani?!

    • @brindarao29
      @brindarao29 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      CJI's patience perhaps to show the public that learned fools do exist and that too within the Bar Limits.

  • @SibyVarghesecherian
    @SibyVarghesecherian หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting arguement

  • @IndianInvader1
    @IndianInvader1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And you should know this sibbal guy is a big leader in Congress party... He lead the case against RAm Mandir.

  • @indiaslawforensicadv.trish4839
    @indiaslawforensicadv.trish4839 หลายเดือนก่อน +729

    Honorable CHIEF JUSTICE IS LISTENING AND RIGHTLY POINTED OUT EVERY POINT OF SIBBAL SIR...SUCH AN EXAMPLE OF PRACTICING LAW AND JUDICIARY TAKING THE STAND ...SATYAMEVA JAYATE

    • @himanshukashyap8763
      @himanshukashyap8763 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Esa h to cji h cm arresting ke case ke sath etni laperwahi kyun ki. Esi female judge ko case diya jo gujrat aur pm modi se related h.
      Akhir h to ye bhi pichle 4 cji ke kafi close... Ab yakin nhi Kiya ja sakta sc highcourt per bhi ..... Na election commission per.. democracy to khatam ho hi gai samjo.

    • @kartikhazarika3101
      @kartikhazarika3101 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@himanshukashyap8763Aaaaa

    • @ramsajiwandubey5355
      @ramsajiwandubey5355 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      In SC Sibbal Will Not Win The Case CAAWill Reman Continu

    • @devanshkhandelwal7749
      @devanshkhandelwal7749 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@himanshukashyap8763Ed ne supreme Cort me evidences submit kiye hai and Ed 14 days ke liye cm ko custoday me rather saktii haii
      Read about it.......

    • @VijaykumarSharma-nv8di
      @VijaykumarSharma-nv8di หลายเดือนก่อน

      DO YOU KNOW ZINHAS 16 AUG 46 DIRECT ACTION DAY
      THESE IN BLACK COATS
      ARE ADDRESDING CONCERN IN FAVOUR OF ZINHAS DIRECT ACTION DAY
      SIBBAL WAS PART OF CONGRESS THAT DESTROYED ASSAM CULTURE BY IMPORTING FROM BANHKADESH FOR VOTE BANK

  • @aruhik
    @aruhik หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Question: how far will u go to be labelled anti hindu and anti national?
    Kapil sibal: yes.

  • @parthamajumder5058
    @parthamajumder5058 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kick out sibbal from the court room

  • @rajarshichakrabarti
    @rajarshichakrabarti หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My forefathers are sufferers of the partition and making of Bangladesh from East Pakistan as Hindus.
    An Indian as in undivided India does not make a person an Indian by default in divided India as well. He is completely and intentionally wrong.

  • @akghoshghosh5150
    @akghoshghosh5150 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    It's really sad to listen to Mr Sibel. How could our judiciary kept listening. He should have been snapped. He Spoke nonsense only.

    • @user-tt4sh2yy6r
      @user-tt4sh2yy6r หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Although I am with you on the broader issue, I have to point out that your suggestion is absolutely undemocratic. In a fair justice system, everyone is entitled to be heard, which means both the right and the wrong and a judgment must be passed declaring one side or the other triumphant and founded on reasoning. What would be the point of a system wherein only those whom you think are right get to speak and not the ones who are wrong? Then there would not remain any distinction before the eyes of the public, "usko bolne mat do" is not justice.

    • @cheramanirumborai7181
      @cheramanirumborai7181 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Coz we Indians love empty talk!

  • @venkateshnatarajan2941
    @venkateshnatarajan2941 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    How is this guy even a lawyer..

  • @ashupatil4156
    @ashupatil4156 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think it is time to send sibal with family in pakistan or bangladesh then he realized actually who need shelter in india.

  • @solusindica89
    @solusindica89 หลายเดือนก่อน

    While acknowledging the historical context of migrations pre-1947 and the subsequent legal framework, it's important to consider the nuanced perspectives encapsulated within the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and constitutional articles. The migratory patterns from 1914 and the conception of India as a cohesive entity before partition indeed underscore a certain fluidity in national identity. However, it's also crucial to delve into the intricacies of post-partition legal amendments and the formation of new nation-states like Bangladesh in 1971.
    The dynamic nature of legal interpretations, especially in matters of migration and citizenship, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of constitutional amendments and international legal precedents. This complexity is not a reflection of the intelligence or acumen of legal authorities but rather a testament to the multifaceted nature of jurisprudence and historical evolution.
    Therefore, when examining migratory patterns and their legal implications, it's imperative to navigate through the layers of legal frameworks with due diligence and a nuanced approach. This ensures a holistic understanding of the complexities involved, avoiding oversimplification and acknowledging the legal expertise and considerations at play in the highest courts of India.
    The historical backdrop highlights ongoing migrations since 1914, which can be viewed as a natural phenomenon. Prior to 1947, individuals were identified as Indians, enjoying the liberty to relocate within the country. This freedom of movement was enshrined in the legal framework, permitting Indians to settle in any part of India until August 15, 1947. Post-partition, individuals retained the right to migrate under the Indian Constitution, thereby maintaining their Indian identity.
    The creation of Bangladesh in 1971, marking its separation from Pakistan, further underscores the application of relevant laws to its populace. These legal principles were subsequently amended in 1978 to accommodate evolving circumstances. It's essential to grasp this context to avoid misconceptions regarding the competency of esteemed legal authorities such as the Chief Justices and lawyers at India's apex court.

  • @rjv238
    @rjv238 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    same Kapil Sibal was arguing against abolition of article 370 citing Kashmir is not fully an integral part of India.

    • @mysteryruler0
      @mysteryruler0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These wolfs are highly paid by anti-india elements paise ko liye yeh apni biwi ko bech de desh kya chij hai.. when you're taking about patriotism these wolfs never bark,

  • @debajyotinath5021
    @debajyotinath5021 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Good arguments and discussions. After Sibal and his arguments are proved wrong, the anti CAA brigade will not have anything left to say legally.

  • @gagandeepchaurasiya3662
    @gagandeepchaurasiya3662 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Saddest part is he was our law minister 🤬

  • @sreebaskarn3864
    @sreebaskarn3864 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In family partition if two houses are there , in joint family all were living in one house . Once the partition takes place , one family got the existing house should only stay and the one got another house should only go their house . They cannot say I lived in that house on the day of partition , so I will live here and ask for equal right . Is it right my learned lawyer Mr Sibal sir ?

  • @vpraman7953
    @vpraman7953 หลายเดือนก่อน +282

    Migration within country is a fundamental right says Sibal. But he was also arguing for restoration of Art 370 and 35 A.

    • @user-ti4hh2qz9s
      @user-ti4hh2qz9s หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What is wrong in it.... Abrrogation of article was illegal...

    • @Lax448
      @Lax448 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      Supreme court said it's legal..😅😂

    • @urrasscal8380
      @urrasscal8380 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-ti4hh2qz9s foreign rreligion called iislamb is responsible for division of iindia therefore this foreign idealogy should be banned from iindia.

    • @shekharavhad7687
      @shekharavhad7687 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Had abrogation of 370 been illegal then supreme court would have said so.@@user-ti4hh2qz9s

    • @EMTMZ
      @EMTMZ หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Mad can say any thing, goat can eat any thing. Never mind.

  • @akghoshghosh5150
    @akghoshghosh5150 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    It's surprising that Sibel tried to fool all the judiciary and sad part t

    • @nareshsharma6526
      @nareshsharma6526 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the judiciary is trying to be a
      fool.😜bcoz both are part of the eco system established by Congress and Leftists.

  • @oz0f1_admin-yt
    @oz0f1_admin-yt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    any context for the above argument? likewise what is the case about?

    • @LawChakra
      @LawChakra  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will provide going forward in the video.

  • @santoshnemade3222
    @santoshnemade3222 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    अयसा लगता है सिब्बल जैसे सपोले भारत से गये क्यू नहीं 😂😂😂

  • @jituladhikary2227
    @jituladhikary2227 หลายเดือนก่อน +99

    sibal openly lies in court too. no accountability. why? does perjury law exits in India?

    • @SaveManWoman
      @SaveManWoman หลายเดือนก่อน

      You think those corrupt political crooks would stand by and not call him ? You just don’t like facts.

  • @Avant-garde1611
    @Avant-garde1611 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

    Why is sibal even allowed in court, such a wastage of court's time😂

    • @ravipambungal5572
      @ravipambungal5572 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Correct he is speaking stupid arguments wasting court's time.

    • @vijayapant1644
      @vijayapant1644 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      EXACTLY SO!

  • @vmnair1
    @vmnair1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This fellow sibal should b sent to Bangladesh or Pakistan. How can he argue like this, especially when he claims to b an Indian. Who is paying him the fee is a big question

  • @prasadvsp6454
    @prasadvsp6454 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This the .5 war that late General Bipin Rawat was referring to.
    India's IB must up the game and root these Hinduphobic traitors out

  • @raihanulislam7097
    @raihanulislam7097 หลายเดือนก่อน +188

    Listening skills ✅ and speaking skill of CJI 🔥🔥

    • @utpalroy1972
      @utpalroy1972 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The problem with this country,it too diverse.Barring south India,where education level is high& there is a sence of unity.Education have inculcated of feeling of pride& value addition.The intelligent adminstration has ushered a better understanding of good governance.There is sence of affinity.The afrosaid highlights are sadly lacking in rest of the country.thus given too an un qualified religiosity.The education level is poor.Thus the misconceptation on progressive lite is missing.There is a sence of insecurities pre
      vails.Thus the depednese on multipule gods& goddess.Hence the polarization is easitest. Therefore belief on Hindutva.Blind hero worshipping has culminated their backwardness.
      S
      S

    • @manognyak6474
      @manognyak6474 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@utpalroy1972don't talk nonsense when you don't have any idea about South India..

    • @AkshayKumar-oh7mr
      @AkshayKumar-oh7mr หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@manognyak6474😊👏

  • @skabc1926
    @skabc1926 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    I have saw once his brother interview who was former diplomat of our country who is completely opposite of him knows the importance of national security but this guy such a disgrace

  • @prafulladas2120
    @prafulladas2120 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow ... after watching I can only say "Ye Dil Mange More..." and you already promised more coming next week ! Great going !!!!

  • @tvr113
    @tvr113 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is Mr Sibal for real? Equating rights for citizens for non citizens. And considering Pre 1947 for citizenship?

  • @kamalakant477
    @kamalakant477 หลายเดือนก่อน +294

    सिब्बल, सिंगवी, प्रशांत भूषण ऐसे वकीलों पार जांच एजेंसीओं को नजर रखने की जरुरत है की इन लोगों को फंडिंग कौन करता है, जो हमेशा आतंकवादी, माउबादी ओर देश विरोधी लोगों का ही मुकदमा लड़ता है l

    • @rajendrabaria5672
      @rajendrabaria5672 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Right

    • @user-fp3sp9iw5c
      @user-fp3sp9iw5c หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      इन लोगों ने वह शिक्षा हासिल की है जो आपको जिंदगी में कभी नहीं मिली। ये लोग संविधान का पालन करना जानते हैं, आपके तरह नहीं जो किसी एक पार्टी के विचार से प्रभावित होकर देश को धर्म के नाम पर बांटे।

    • @pankajverma5320
      @pankajverma5320 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      In ko jaha Paisa jyada milta hai ye waha khadey ho jatey hain aur Funding kin key paas jyada hai ye sab ko maloom hai.

    • @pankajverma5320
      @pankajverma5320 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@user-fp3sp9iw5c
      Aisi hi Shiksha Gandhi Nahru aur Jinnah ko mili thi jis ki wajah sey Lakho log marey gayey. Neta Ji, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Udham Singh, Madan Lal Dhingra, Verr Savarkar aur Sardar Patel ney aisi mahaan Shiksha nahi li isi liye unhoney Desh key liye apna jeevan arpan kar diya.

    • @pankajverma5320
      @pankajverma5320 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@user-fp3sp9iw5c
      Partition Religion key basis par hua tha, is ki demand Muslims ney ki thi aur Pakistan sey Minorities ko khatam karney ka kaam turant hi shuru kar diya tha aur ab yahi kaam Bangladesh mey cbal raha hai is liye faltu ki Shiksha aur Samvidhan ka rona roney ki jaroorat nahi hai. Abhi kitney Article hain pooch liya to batti gul ho jayegi.

  • @venkatramangopalakrishnan1989
    @venkatramangopalakrishnan1989 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It is a shame for judges listening to such non sense without stopping the lawyer talking such non sense.

  • @mgoldenforest22
    @mgoldenforest22 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sibal sir you are great ❤☪️💪

    • @madhavishelar1907
      @madhavishelar1907 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pata chal raha hain kya karne ki koshish ho Rahi Hain.

  • @girijakaul4610
    @girijakaul4610 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SIBAL JI AAP GALT BHOL RAHEEYE HOO COME SENSES

  • @iamundefined100
    @iamundefined100 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Sibbal represents the "Golden age of Secularism" where Hindu bashing was litmus test for secularism, where the first right on resources belonged to minorities.

  • @sureshchakradeo4040
    @sureshchakradeo4040 หลายเดือนก่อน +191

    In1947 IT was partition of India but in 1971 it was partition of Pakisthan and not of India as said by Adv.Sibble

    • @varanasidurga5551
      @varanasidurga5551 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Those two people know. Still they say like that.

    • @yasishq1826
      @yasishq1826 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Listen to 8:09 Adv Sibal corrected himself by saying second partition of Pakistan.

    • @prasaddamale8912
      @prasaddamale8912 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@yasishq1826 😂😂

    • @ShubhAshish-ke7dw
      @ShubhAshish-ke7dw หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      In 1971, Bangladesh should would have joined India as a state as we own the war at the cost of Indian blood.

    • @narayananchakravarthi7407
      @narayananchakravarthi7407 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Correct. This intelligent crook is trying to confuse the people. What happened in 1971 was not 2nd partion of India. It was a partition of Pakistan, where we had a stake being in between and had to face lot of disruptions. Kapil Sibal is a crook.

  • @AjayArsenal
    @AjayArsenal หลายเดือนก่อน

    My question is, when will a Hindu Lawyer fight for the rights of Hindus like this old man.

  • @Soim_Goa
    @Soim_Goa 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    CJI Chandrachud is not a regular person. He is one of the finest justices in india. Sibal is trying to get an upper hand by taking the battle from the ambit of legality/constitution to the stage of concocted history. Because he knows that CJI is well versed with judicial procedures and law, but not expected to challenge Sibal on matters that relate to "history", especially if the history is a creation of Sibal himself. However what he forgets is that The CJI is not someone who would take decisions in haste and will go back to study the matter in detail, including history and give a judgement that finally befits the legal outline of morality and justice, not history of Sibal!

  • @sudhabajpai6009
    @sudhabajpai6009 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    अगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे कपिल सिब्बल,
    प्रशांत भूषण जेसे लोग है ।जो देश
    विरोधी लोगो के लिए लड़ते है इनकी
    प्रॉपर्टी की जांच होनी चाहिए और कोर्ट
    की कारवाई हिन्दी मे होनी चाहिए ताकी
    कोर्ट के मक्करो को जनता समझ सके ।

    • @CowardRiderrr
      @CowardRiderrr หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Right

    • @teresenahopayega1894
      @teresenahopayega1894 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yahi to locha hai
      Gandhi (Bhimrao Ambedkar) ne constitution English me hi likhvaya tha, vo nhi chahte the ki unki tarah koi raaj kare isliye sab kuchh English me

    • @chandrakant1837
      @chandrakant1837 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@teresenahopayega1894 because english is global language. South Indian opposes hindi

  • @bibspinku163
    @bibspinku163 หลายเดือนก่อน +291

    I am neither a law student nor understand the practice of law but the way the Argument is being held and the decent exchange of words between MR Sibal and Hon. CJI gives me thought to my own attitude.Like how we can present our thought point and Argument in our daily life when we are in Public forum.Lots of learning on History ,language, law and constitution from this argument.Kudos to the Law Chakra team for bringing this out.

    • @dpvasanthaprema629
      @dpvasanthaprema629 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes Bro….. amazing

    • @gopalprabhu5502
      @gopalprabhu5502 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It s truely told that law is an ass

    • @swapnilpawar8015
      @swapnilpawar8015 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It's the Supreme Court of India. Were you expecting Bollywood like court proceedings?

    • @loveearthly
      @loveearthly หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Don’t be naive. The CJI is listening patiently to a senile lawyer claiming that East Pakistanis were Indians between day of Independence & 1971 war.

    • @bibspinku163
      @bibspinku163 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@loveearthly He claimed that the minority linguistic groups living in East Pakistan were originally from India, as they belonging to the undivided Indian subcontinent and thats the truth.

  • @rakakandy7229
    @rakakandy7229 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who made this guy a lawyer and how is he practicing. He should just be ignored and should be declared head of fools.

  • @danishbiochem
    @danishbiochem หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a masterclass by Sibal.

  • @sandhyavishwanathgowda5343
    @sandhyavishwanathgowda5343 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    We cannot compromise with National security at any point of time. We support CAA & NRC👍🏻