Carnell Smith lobbys against paternity fraud on CBS Early Show
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
- Carnell Smith is the International Expert Spokesman on Paternity Fraud, Family Law and DNA testing issues. Smith is a Strategist, Coach, Advocate, Speaker and frequent contributor to TV, radio, newspapers, magazines and film projects Worldwide. The Georgia Law was sponsored by Representative Stanley Watson (HB369, 2002)19-7-54 passed 163-0 House, 45-5 Senate and the Governor Roy Barnes signed into law as Carnell Smith watched in-person on May 9, 2002.
See www.CarnellSmith.com
Men and boys have been successfully sued by mothers and the State Office of Child Support Enforcement (in USA) for paternity and child support.
This includes males who:
1. Didn't know the mother and never had sex with her
2. Knew her but didn't have sex with her during the child's window of conception
3. Was deployed out of country in Military during the child's window of conception
4. Born sterile, had a vasectomy or became sterile due to medical reasons
5. Married but separated and is not cohabiting with the child's mother
6. Is one of multiple paternity candidates, but this fact was concealed from him.
There's so much more about this topic than a lot of men and boys are aware of, that he's finally sharing in the first book in the Paternity Fraud series after Carnell's fight all the way to the US Supreme Court seeking a legal remedy for more than 1 million men and boys who are confirmed by DNA testing as not the father of the child tested.
My first book is on Amazon
"TRAPPED BY LAW"
Stop Paying Child Support for Paternity Fraud amz.run/3MD1
Please feel free to join the Carnell Smith Book Launch Community group on Facebook for the latest news.
www.facebook.c...
This could not happen if our legislators and Judges had an ounce of integrity or decency.
30% of the child support being paid is paid by men NOT responsible for fathering the child. How can that not be construed Fraud?
Because women are doing it.
Women are gods and can never do wrong.
The women's advocates couch it as being "for the child". But if that same woman had opted for an abortion I would ask, would that be "for the child" as well? Women seem to want it both ways....which ever benefits them the most, fair or not, honest or not, truthful or not. If a man discovers he isn't the father of a child, whether or not he's developed a relationship with the child it shouldn't matter. That relationship came about due to a deception by the mother. And why don't we ever hear anything from these "advocates" as far as the mother's part in this??? They act like she had no part in it, and she's the one who perpetuated the fraud. We need some common sense in the family courts. You won't hear many women talk about this since they know they have a HUGE advantage in Family court. They should call it "woman's court". If the man wants to continue to have a relationship with the child then so be it, but he shouldn't be required to have to pay to do it.
TideFan Yankee My thing is, if everything is done in the best interests of the child, what makes a man who is no kin at all to the child responsible for its well being?
@@frankdees507 To whom are you referring specifically when you say "man who is no kin"? I'm not being obtuse, I just want to be clear who you're talking about specifically?
TideFan Yankee lol If a man did not father a child, that man and child are no more kin than you and my child, yet you can be considered responsible for my child’s well being as opposed to his aunts, uncles, grandparents, and actual family
There needs to be more light shed on this issue. Paternity fraud should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. If you miss child support payments you go to jail and possibly lose your main source of income or perhaps career. The same should be said for deceptively placing the responsibility of a child on the wrong man.
Women should not have a say in this.. why are so many women speaking on this?
DNA testing at birth should be mandatory in every states
I'm Carnell Smith. I agree with you 💯 percent that DNA paternity testing at-birth is the best solution.
It would expose paternity fraud before the child was 1 month old. Moms should not be allowed to use fraud, deception, lies or mistaken identity to get child support from the man that didn't cause her pregnancy per her claims that he did. Moms generally know if there's more than one paternity candidate. Men don't!
Don't ever trust any woman not even your own family about any situation
I'm Carnell Smith. I understand your viewpoint and will agree to not take anyone's word about paternity. The DNA test is proven as more reliable. Trust, but verify!
Men SHOULD be able to "walk away from those responsibilities" ANY time it can be proven they're not HIS responsibilities! How about finding the actual father with the help of the mother? And, if this was intentional, the mother should get prison time!
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks for your supporting the truth that a man is not responsible for supporting anyone that he was deceived into supporting including the mother.
Restitution should be automatic for women who commit paternity fraud.
Once i find that the child not mine' im gone , im not maintaining another mans seed while he walks around with no responsibility .
@@robertcampbell9946 I understand. In some cases, the level of pain, jail or prison time spent and other reasons are going to influence the deceived man or teen boy to walkaway.
Not his kid, mom lied or made a material mistake of fact and she should required to correct the facts.
DNA test at-birth reveal truth much sooner.
It's his choice to make the best decision for his peace of mind, financial risk and liberty risk. But he must get his name removed from the Paternity establishment Court order and they birth certificate or the child support enforcement continues.
He legitimately used the word victim for one simple reason. He had fraud committed against him, and it was a good scam. he believed it.
Agreed. The facts are not that difficult to understand. Thanks from Carnell Smith
Who is going to support the child? The mother! They want equality well here it is!
💯 percent agreed. Women can stop and prevent paternity fraud with DNA testing at-birth. Thanks calling for equal responsibility.
They tried DNA testing at birth at a London (UK) hospital and were quickly overwhelmed by non-matching (U R Not the Father) results......up to 63%.......so they stopped doing it. It offended their gynocentric sensibilities.
Thanks for this information. I'm not surprised at those results. Is there a reference that I could use?
Damm!!! I never heard about this either. 63% is out of this world! That is almost 2/3rds of all baby's born are bastards! Makes me want to take samples of my kids blood to a DNA specialist even though I am "almost" 100% sure my children are mine. WOW!
.
DNA testing at birth regardless of relationship status could be a great thing.
Imagine how much crime will cease or how much money will be saved in investigations. Someone commits a crime and their DNA is immediately matched, identifying them almost instantaneously.
And of course, establishing paternity from onset. So if this is not your kid, paternity can be determined by matching collected samples.
I see this as a win win for everyone involved, even the moms who have no clue which dude is dad and kid grows up knowing exactly who that is.
It could be helpful. Some diseases are present in the DNA at birth, but only manifest themselves later on, sometimes when it is too late to respond appropriately. If we altered the testing done at birth, a small thing since we draw blood on kids for other tests, the results might be enlightening. We could then gather the DNA testing results for research or defense of paternity as in the case of this video.
Unless that government abuses those DNA samples, to commit or cover up crimes for criminals. The problem is a society by the people for the people. It should be a society by the genetically gifted for the people.
Someone commits a crime and their DNA is immediately matched, identifying them almost instantaneously. Yes you can say but what if someone plants and frames you for a crime you didnt commit but the DNA is there, so YOU MUST HAVE committed the crime, yes - no? DNA in a child is impossible to plant besides the real parent/person.
Think thats a very good idea.
Insurance companies and employers would abuse the fuck out of this.
Why aren't the women who commit these fraud placed in jail, instead of the victim men.
I'm Carnell Smith. Great question Damion. Paternity Fraud is fraud!
Thanks Greg and Berth. I am sympathetic to men who want to continue a relationship with the child that he thought was his own.
I think that should be his choice with NO court order of any kind. Truth is a good thing!
Carnell Smith How did the court rule?
Eltroy Dixon I won. See the Fox5 clip in court.
Carnell Smith do you get money back when the child is not yours and how long does that take
Taisha Reynolds None in my case. Judge refused to sign the vacate order unless I waived my right to sue the mother for damages.
It was unfair, but cheaper than staying under the original order and going to prison. I'm free for more than 10 years and loving it.
Carnell Smith congratulations, you did not need to be incarcerated at all!
Yes, it should mean that you can wak away if you are not the father. The truth is what it is.
Jemase, thanks for your reply. Paternity Fraud is one reason to do DNA testing at-birth, to accurately add biological parents to the birth certificate and to guarantee that people leave the hospital with their child.
Truth is important when linking moms to newborn babies with ID, then truth requires accurate paternity. Who's afraid of the truth?
That duckmaker (What her name roughly translates from German) bitch needs to eat rat poison.
And the woman should pay back every penny with interest. And pay for emotional damages.
Thanks for your post. I agree that we need restitution and damages to be levied against those who commit and participate in Paternity Fraud. The affected men should not be jailed nor lose any assets.
Women don't care who's going to pay for child support as long as someone is paying.
I agree, no man should be forced to pay for child-support, it has to stop NOW!!! And the real Father doesn't pay nothing, that's so redundant.....
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks Jacqueline for your comments in support of true paternity that avoids responsibility for the biological father. Truth Matters!
@@PaternityCoach- Your welcome bro, my husband went thru a similar situation, and the Mother still will not do a DNA, so we reported her, she stole a lot of money from him/us. Glad it worked out for you, and sorry your family suffered financially too, God bless you!!!
Sue these advocates for their gross negligence.
30 percent!! ....WOW!
Wife cheated and lied 3 times producing 3 children and the crooked judge wouldn't budge!! That's horrible! It's about the money...
I think he was talking about the guy in Texas... They were probably the judges kids..
Marital paternity fraud examples: Morgan Wise of Texas, 3 of 4 kids not his by ex-wife and Dennis Caron of Ohio, 1 of 1 kid not his by ex-wife. The family law should not contain a conclusive presumption of paternity that a kid born while a man is married to his wife is automatically his.
Some wives are cheaters or are separated and get pregnant with the other guy's kid.
If the DNA paternity test shows 0% paternity, the man should win his divorce for adultery and pay no alimony nor child support unless he had agreed in writing for medically assisted pregnancy, surrogacy or formal legal adoption of an unrelated kid.
Carnell Smith yes 👍🏾 to all of this.
Carnell Smith is doing a great thing.
Thanks for your post. Truth should be the standard in every court.
Let Joan Entmacher pay the child support. The logic of these women and their judges is so twisted. Why not just have a lottery in which every adult male can be selected to pay child support.
This should be a felony.
Agreed, especially since the amount of money easily exceeds $1,000 USD over a few months or less in some cases.
Hi Michael, I agree, especially if she knowingly lie, and cheated on her spouse... Fraud is fraud!!!
Great work Carnell
Who's going to support the child that's why the child has a mother let the mother support the child case closed
Especially if they're acting big and bad. Alot of em have kids so they can get money plain and simple.
💯 percent agreed. It's true that some women and girls lie about who helped her conceive a baby to convince the guy she wants to be in a relationship with.
Some of the women in this video are shockingly cavalier about individual rights as it pertains to men who are not the father of a child. It''s shameful behavior and to see them come right out and bald-faced say men should be forced to pay regardless of paternity is absolutely disgusting.
Thanks for your post. I agree that the lack of empathy for the pain, loss of liberty and financial damages to the men affected by Paternity Fraud by some women reveals their double standards or radical feminist ideology by opposing "Truth in Paternity fact laws".
True equality would require women who commit Paternity Fraud to be help accountable with consequences and restitution.
Men are not the only victim!! How about the child who has been deceived by their mother? The betrayal and inability for the child to know their biological family is very damaging and it lasts a lifetime. Unless you yourself have lived it you really have no idea of how destructive it is for the child.
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks for your comments Mistylove. It's true that men are not the only victims.
When a mom lies about paternity, she also lies to her own child.
Unfortunately, men are only ones that can go to jail or prison for refusal to pay the mother after he learned of her lies about paternity.
DNA testing at-birth will reveal the truth upfront, so that everyone can know real paternity in the beginning.
Truth about paternity matters to men and kids. Thanks for your feedback.
"The courts want someone to support the child". OK, how about the guy who ACTUALLY fathered the child? I'd start there first. If mommy doesn't know who she spread her legs for then it's ALL on mommy. The courts shouldn't reward women being irresponsible at the cost of the most convenient man to point a finger at.
I don't see Carnell or anyone advocating for men to get out of paying child support for children THEY actually fathered......but if a man didn't father a child, he shouldn't be forced to pay for them.
Then the other woman (another advocate) says "if you have taken responsibility for the child, if the child looks at you as a parent" etc...etc....etc.... Yes, due to a fraud perpetuated by the mother. Many, in fact most of these men didn't know they weren't the father, they took the mom's word for it. That is a deception and it shouldn't be rewarded.
No one is saying that a man can't act and behave as a parent to a child that's not his, he just shouldn't have to be required to PAY for the privilege. Again, the courts are rewarding mom's lie.... Can anyone name another situation where you can knowingly, willfully lie and deceive another in court, for financial benefit and the court backs you up??? I can't. The family courts need to join the other courts in the 21st Century where DNA DOES matter, and they can't substitute emotions and "feelings" for facts.....
Would this even be a question if a woman discovered they had been given the wrong child to take home from the hospital??? Say there was a mix up and two weeks after each baby was taken home it was discovered? Would a court say "no, you can't switch them back so you have the child that's actually yours"????? No, they wouldn't, the situation would be corrected. But when something ONLY effects men, then the courts get a "bit" more loose with their interpretations. It's not family court, it's woman's court.
This will terrify some women.
Maybe it should. I know the DNA paternity test is better reliable indicator of the "paternity facts" than mother's verbal assurance that the guy is the "only possible father" aka biological father. Thanks from Carnell Smith
Even those reporters couldn't believe it.
So are the women going to jail for contempt of court for lieing to the judge claiming the men are the father.
Unfortunately, it's not contempt for mothers to lie, accidentally omit material facts or claim to not remember having more than one intimate partner during the child's window of conception. It may be a case of perjury, legal fraud, actual fraud, if it can be supported by corroborated evidence.
It's simpler and safer for men and teen boys to get a legal DNA paternity test every time someone claims that he's the father of a child.
Mandatory paternity test at birth will solve many of men’s issues.
No one wants to take responsibility for the partners they choose?
Okay, again. Wow and I thought I saw it all. Carnell Smith you have really socked it to them.
Peace & power bro.
Thanks. I am so glad that I won and freed myself and my family out of that legal trap. Carnell Smith - Author of TRAPPED BY LAW, See ThePaternityCoach.com
Let all these strong independent women support the kid. Don't need no man. The court suggesting that they won't release a man from his fraudulently obtained obligation because the welfare of the child is the priority is tantamount to saying that mothers are incapable of handling support on their own. They fucked around and did it to their kid. That man didn't have shit to do with it.
It is not possible for a woman to name the wrong man as the father "in good faith". She knows with whom she has had relations. Mandatory paternity testing of all children is the only solution.
Of course it's possible to name a wrong man mistakenly. The fact that dates for things like conception are only approximate and could be off in either direction makes this not only possible but likely if the Mother has had relations with more than 1 man in say a 4 week period (2 weeks in either direction from estimated doc).
@@EvilLoynis If we do DNA testing at-birth, then we don't have to trust the mother's honesty nor her memory.
DNA parentage testing reveals the actual facts versus feelings in identifying the biological father and biological mother.
They say that men should be held to their financial responsibilities because they have established a relationship with the child. In the same breath, they deny the man visitation or equal custody rights thereby making a relationship with the child impossible. What a load of hypocrisy.
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks Johnny for commenting. You're right about the hypocrisy when non-custodial dads rarely get their custody time enforced by the same Judge that talks about "best interest of the child" when discussing child support.
Try to imagine paying for a kid, not allowed to see the kid due to parental interference then discover the kid is not your kid and the Judge doesn't place any blame on the mom for lying to the guy or her kid.
Paternity Fraud is an example where some women evade personal responsibility for concealing material facts from the guy that she wants to be the father. Truth matters to men and kids!
@@PaternityCoach When the law abandons clear and undeniable truth in favor of quick and easy convenience, it ceases to be worthy of upholding.
Then this testing needs to be done at birth so men don’t get screwed!!!!
I'm Carnell Smith. I agree that DNA paternity testing at-birth will help men get the truth needed for an informed decision. Truth matters!
In other words, the "interests of the child" strips fathers and men who turn out not to be the father of their rights. The argument the judge is using is ridiculous--by that logic, they could randomly order the richest man in the community to pay child support since it's "in the best interests of the child."
Exactly. That's why it's so easy to expose the unjust laws.
We need a pro-men group, ASAP.
Maybe some of the right to life for us should start supporting these kids they might change their tune. That statement came from a biology instructor I had when I was in college. Also if it’s all about the child then it should be all about the child to know who their rightful parents really are.
What would be the problem with mandatory DNA testing?
The way things are you almost don’t even need to know who the father is with the weight DNA is kept at birth you’re already in the database you should be able to find who the father is eventually
It's not about child welfare it's about making thing easier for the court. The court can and will take the easiest way out.
If the family court is interested in the truth, they would support DNA testing at-birth as the reliable way to get true facts.
Some moms will lie instead of admitting to multiple paternity candidates during the window of conception. DNA testing is fair and impartial. Trust but verify by DNA.
@@PaternityCoach I agree...Keep fighting brother.
This video is from 2014 and the laws have not changed. Don't get married/don't have kids.
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks for your comments. I believe this video aired before 2003. I agree that men should be extremely careful in the choosing a wife if he's interested in marriage.
I also think men and boys should take every step possible to not have any kids outside of marriage and don't marry just because she says "I'm pregnant".
Always verify paternity claims with a legal DNA paternity test when "anyone claims a male is the father".
I'm speaking as a happily married man of more than 28 years that tested his kid with his wife after learning that his ex-GF lied about paternity.
Truth matters to men and kids.
If 1 penny was paid arrest the woman for fraud
If the DNA test says you are not the father you shouldn't have to pay, and if the father has been paying for a child that is not his and DNA test prooves it's not his baby then the woman has to pay back all that child support money she received over the years for that baby because she new the baby was not her husbands and even if she didn't know the babys was not her husbands she still accepted monies when she knew the baby may not have been her husbands. This should be treated as theft by deception and depending how much money she received determines misdameaner or felony theft and if she refuses to pay back the money she gets sent to jail or prison accordingly, also the mother must disclose the name of the real father in open court, Plus if the man finds the baby is not his after he has fathered the baby he can sew the mother for emotional stress she has caused the man and the man should get paid for this too. Just like the men in jail or prison for not paying child support for they're real babies, this way the woman are held responsable for what they do just like the man, no acceptions.
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks for your comments in support of women being held accountable for theft by deception and fraud. I agree 💯 percent. Truth matters to men and kids.
It's time these scallywag bitches are held responsible and held to pay like men have been held to pay and if it takes jail or prison time so be it.
#MGTOW
People (women, judges, lawyers, yeah even police) who force men to pay for children not their own, know deep inside they are instigating a powerful and horrific karma against themselves that will only be appeased at enormous sacrifice. Know I'm right.
I'm Carnell Smith. It's my experience that the people who support defrauding men by paternity fraud really don't care until it happens to their son, family member, themselves or a close friend. A great option to avoid the trap is by DNA testing at-birth.
God Bless this man... I wonder how is he doing today?
Hi Ron, this is Carnell Smith. I am doing quite well and am so glad to be free using the law that I was lobbying to help other paternity fraud victims.
I won my case with TV camera in the courtroom and eliminated all arrears.
The unjust laws can be changed by "We the people" with God's help. Free at last!
@@PaternityCoach you are a hero to many, this is just flat out wrong and its time to correct this wrong. what is the link to your organization so i can learn and contribute to it? also what are your latest efforts in other states?
@@ronwhiteleo3352 Hi Ron, I am humbled and grateful for your kind words.
I owe all of the credit to God because he gave me the "will to win, inspite of the odds".
I have helped several states over the years that I traveled out of pocket with no outside funding, but now it's time to Train and Coach other victims that fit my group Coaching and Mastermind programs to work with me.
I'd appreciate it, if you would share my site CarnellSmith.com with others that may be interested. Thanks
M
2:10 "They are very reluctant to leave a child without support." Support payments made through the court usually incur a fee payable to the court.
Translation - the court is very reluctant to let the innocent man out of the paternity fraud trap and it's easier to force the deceived man to pay child support.
i say if they fraud some men out cuz it not his kid they cant force him to pay at all the judge sure be arrest & sued & the mother sure be arrest for fraud & sued & the kid taken away from the mother... if this happen to me cuz im disable & they try to force me to pay for kid thats not my i sue the hell out of the judge & have him arrest & the sue the person who doing the fraud
I'm Carnell Smith. I appreciate and understand your disagreement about paying child support for paternity fraud. Unfortunately, you can't win a suit against the judge because of Immunity.
We have to change the laws to require decisions based on truth.
Are you serious? The men’s paternal and therefore civic responsibilities to their (assumed) biological children are predicated on a specified biological consanguinity, therefore: not my child, not my problem. It becomes then a state sanctioned de facto reward for infidelity. How is this not, on its face, glaringly obvious? There are even cases where non-consanguine support is still upheld even when the true father is known, shown to have biological progenitor, and is still relieved from any legal and pecuniary responsibility. How is this justice?
You have a grasp of the injustice in paternity fraud. Essentially, rewarding some women for lies or mistakes instead of correcting the situation when DNA test results show 0% paternity.
DNA test at 0% proves that the accused male didn't cause the pregnancy and shouldn't pay 18-21 years or lifetime for a disabled child that's not his.
Mandatory testing at birth would prove who the child's biological father is. If the man nor the woman has nothing to hide, they both would agree to the test. If either party is reluctant, that should be a red flag, that someone is lying.
saleemah muhammad You and I agree that DNA testing at-birth would provide the truth in the beginning. Thanks for commenting
Nothing wrong with putting the childs need 1st bur not at the expense of an innocent man.Frankly , i think these people in these field's just dont wanna do their work properly.
I agree. How are the child’s needs the responsibility of someone who is no kin to it whatsoever smh
File a civil suit.
No one should pay for a child that is not theirs
I'm Carnell Smith. Thanks for standing up for truth in paternity. The only people who should be pay child support for unrelated kids should be formally adopted parents or assisted pregnancy cases where the man consented to the procedure in writing and it's approved by both parties at the time of conception.
DNA testing at-birth will show the truth in most cases.
This is total BS!!!
No mention of the sperm receptical's role or responsibility.
I'm Carnell Smith. That's a great question Ashley. It's amazing that the feminist are not arguing for a woman's right to be held responsible for her actions in lying or being mistaken about a picking an innocent guy in a paternity lawsuit.
Equal Rights must also mean EQUAL RESPONSIBILITY, right? Thanks for your comment.
@@PaternityCoach Even if equal rights means equal responsibility most women would still see a paternity test, be it at birth or after, as a disrespectful act. I did ask my girlfriend as a test and she was shocked and took it as an insult that I would ask for a paternity test at birth. Even though that would allow to reinforce paternity and leave no room for doubt or mistake. I don't get the mindset there. Why not just do the test ? I'm not saying she's got anything to hide but when I asked for a comparison she said that men should be tested if they cheated or not .. Which was not really relevant to the question. I guess there is also some work to be done for that kind of mentality of feeling insulted just because men want to be sure given the times we live in.
@@MrMaelstorm I completely understand. It depends the woman's mentality and maturity.
I asked my wife and she understood and said "yes, because I have nothing to hide".
The legal DNA paternity test confirmed that we are both of the biological parents and there was nothing to hide.
My professional advice to my clients is to always get the legal DNA paternity test, even if the woman agrees or disagrees. The test brings certainty and peace of mind.
Did you know that some men get a legal DNA paternity test without the mother, especially where she refused to take the test?
I've had clients attempt to skip the DNA paternity test because the woman agrees, protests or cries then the test revealed those men were not the father. Trust, but verify.
What bullshit is this
If the kid is not the mans so why he should pay for them
????
Where is the jusyice in this?
When a man pay for a child is because he thinks its his.. but when he finds out the kid is not his so hes not obligated to pay a dime for a child not his
Why should a man continues to pay for a child that is not his, but the laws says he cannot walk away if that child looked to that father that he or she has always known as his or her father; but the mother can take rights away from the father if she comes forth and says the child is not his? How does the woman get the power to determine if she can pick and chose who she wants to be held accountable to father her child, especially if she has deceived that man into believing he is the biological father when he is not? Seems like a double standard in favor of the woman.
I feel so angry at this. Hw can someone b made to pay child support for kids that aint urs
Thanks for seeing the injustice and unfairness where some US Family courts like California, Texas, New York, Washington state and others enforce the Paternity Fraud against men and teen boys using "pay or jail for refusal to pay".
Rarely are any actions taken by the same Family Courts against the mothers that lied about paternity and the existence of multiple paternity candidates.
Equal Justice under the law must hold moms accountable for negligence, perjury and fraud. Also set the wrongfully deceived men/boys free and return their money.
Its been 5 years since u uploaded. Did you manage to get justice?
@@BrytTrades I'm Carnell Smith. Yes, I won my case after an unsuccessful appeal to the US Supreme Court of the United States. I won at the Family Law state court using the new GA law that I and others lobbied for.
Freedom demands justice and victory is worth the battle.
They should make it a law for maternity fraud and that'll put a stop to a lot of this. That child deserve the right to know who his real parent are, they are being robbed out of their heritage they need to know what's in the bloodline.
I'm Carnell Smith. I agree that "Paternity Fraud" laws are needed to help men know which kids are his and for kids to know their family lineages. Truth Matters!
Women could have more credibility if they lead the charge fir mandatory birth DNA testing
When I see this type of injustice I think of the feminist that help build it.
I'm Carnell Smith. 💯 percent agreed
Why aren’t there more Carnell smiths full videos.
Hi Oneal, I'm Carnell Smith. There will be more added as my team and complete our book launch to empower people to avoid this trap, get out of this trap and how to change the laws like we have done. Feel Free to subscribe to the channel to get notified
Carol Sanger? Thats too much of a coincidence. She may be related to and a decendent of Margaret Sanger....
5:05 What was the decision?
3 of the 4 kids not his and the Judge force him to pay child support anyway?..... (Why do we put up with this?)...smh.
Amazingly cruel, by ordering the man who has been deceived by his ex-wife for three kids then the Judge removes his parenting time for all four of them.
Morgan is not the person who did wrong here.
What about the long time cheating ex-wife who defrauded Morgan per my conversation with him?
Why call it a court, when the law is abused there?
One of the problems in Family Court can be the broad discretion of Judges
Currently, the states without a paternity fraud aka paternity disestablishment statute creates an environment that's supportive of lying to men and teen boys about true paternity.
We can fix the broken system, but not alone. Please join our email list at CarnellSmith.com
The problem is that family court does not allow jury trials.
Thanks for commenting Caleb. You're 💯 percent correct that family law cases do be not get jury trials as a matter of statutory law.
That woman said men need to "take responsibility"? Where is the woman's responsibility for fraud?
Hello, Mr. Smith. 5:00 How did the judge rule?
Hi @chuckscott4661, I won by using the law that I co-wrote with my GA legislators. I had TV News in the courtroom th-cam.com/video/x0-iM21BuPk/w-d-xo.html | Carnell Smith, Author of TRAPPED BY LAW. Learn more at ThePaternityCoach.com
The mother should support the child
💯 percent agreed
That's crap! You're slapped with an 18 year car payment and it's never yours. And proof that it's not yours. Plus, you're not allowed to have a decision regarding the kid.
I'm not saying to walk away from the relationship, but all payments should stop immediately and some reimbursement from the mother. Then, it's her job to find the real father, but not the wallet person. Where is the march for equality under the law? Shouldn't the law be blind?
Thanks for commenting. I agree with you.
How can you be held criminally responsible for not paying child support when DNA is exonerating you in a criminal court that should be upheld in a civil court but then again the criminal side is about child support but that is the issue the child support is not your responsibility
In every other case fraud is a crime but with respect to paternity of child women are instead rewarded for their fraudulent behavior.
Yet genetic material is allowed to be in court for any other crimes
I love the feminists said it’s not fair for the child to be supported by the man only then for him to walk away after finding out the kid isn’t his. But these are the same feminists that think it’s okay to state that they want custody to go to mothers just because they’re mothers!
just a paternity fraud Question.
Can you as a Victim sue the child for the payment demanded of him by courts as child support when he did not father that child when the child is an adult
In most cases, NO. The child is not the person who sued the man or boy for child support and establishing paternity. The possible defendants are the child's mother, legal guardian and the biological father of the child.
Good question. ThePaternityCoach.com
This is a women's rights movement. We can screw whoever we want and blame who we want and must pay. And a judge backs it up. How is that good for the kid? Eventually the false father will tell the adult kid the truth. Which will have the same effect or worse.
@carnell smith Have you heard about the paternity case that involved twin brothers? One brother was married and his wife was imoregnated by the twin brother (The brothers didn't know they had siblings). I know crazy story. Well the accused brother an officer in the Navy.
Hi @markswift, I am not familiar with those twin brothers. I helped one of my clients win his paternity fraud case in GA where his identical twin brother who's married is the biological father. Please share the link with me about that story - I'd be glad to do a reaction video about it. ThePaternityCoach.com
@@PaternityCoach I've tried to find the case. I think the YT censors scrub it. I will use other search engines besides Google. Thanks for the reply.
Mandatory DNA should be done on all children born to parents who are not married.
I almost agree with you Marcia. A better solution would be mandatory DNA testing whenever the mother claims the male is the biological father regardless of marital status to insure equal treatment under law.
This could guarantee a higher percentage of children getting the truth on their birth certificates when they're much younger.
Married women don't always tell the truth about paternity in 100% of divorce and family law cases.
Many, if not most of the videos on my TH-cam channels show men whose wives or ex-wives didn't tell the truth about the paternity of their children.
@@PaternityCoach my husband paid support for a child that wasn't his. He was told to sign papers by his mom. He didn't read them, he was being shipped out by the military in 24 hours. I was his biggest supporter of his rights on his case. So I truly understand where you are coming from.
@@marciawilliams2637 Thanks for commenting. I'm truly sorry that your husband was or is affected by marital paternity fraud.
Is his case over or is still paying? If he's still paying and wants to explore options against marital paternity fraud. He can apply for a complementary Consultation by completing our Intake Application at Application.CarnellSmith.com
@@PaternityCoach his case is over. I went down on his behalf had his case audited, received a refund of overpayment and then had his support stopped on that child's 18th birthday.
@@marciawilliams2637 That sounds good. I stopped when the child was 11 and never paid again.
Please warn other military members and parents with sons about paternity fraud. Public awareness will help some people.
They're doing so much to try absolving women of any form of accountability.
Modern day femeni$m at its worst,,
I'd never agree to mandatory testing at birth. 100% choice. Forcing people into things leads to really weird and extreme results.
The way both sides want things and the way they act puts more stress on kids and functional families. Pandering to 1%'ers in any demographic just causes more issues. Everybody needs to just make better decisions.
Thanks for commenting with your viewpoint.
The DNA test approach has a proven track record for more than 15 years in truthfully identifying people for maternity, paternity, siblingship, grandparents, immigration and criminal cases.
The voluntary disclosure process has failed and we currently don't get 100% of the mothers to be fully truthful in paternity cases about the existence of all paternity candidates.
Thanks for your comments.
child welfare first maybe the court should go after the real father for support only women lawyers are against mandortory dna test at birth
Absolutely the courts can release the guy that didn't cause the pregnancy.
Most of the the men in the news were married to the child's mother that lied about who fertilized her egg. Truth matters to men and kid's.
2:04 But not when they’re being killed in the womb.
Don't give the female your correct name.
Having unprotected sex happens often.
Hi Wendy, thanks for your comment.
Your statement about unprotected sex is true.
In fact, one of the most overlooked points about Paternity Fraud is that the child's mother is the person having unprotected sex for the child(ren) involved and she oftentimes will not disclose that there are "multiple paternity candidates" to her husband, boyfriend or fiance.
This is deliberate deception because the child's mother is the usually the only who knows for sure that she had unprotected sex with multiple guys during the "window of conception".
There's a ethical, fiduciary and moral duty to disclose "material facts'.
Per Morgan Wise he was married and his wife didn't tell him about her affairs.
Per Dennis Caron, his wife didn't tell him about her unprotected sex partners before he married her because she was pregnant.
Carnell Smith's ex-GF had unprotected sex with a guy in another state and chose to hide that information from him when she said "I'm pregnant and you're the father".
We can't trust that every mother is going to tell the truth about paternity, especially when there's a lot of money and property involved.
DNA testing at-birth will help every child know the truth about their biological parents and take the profits out of Paternity Fraud.
Thanks,
Carnell Smith - The PATERNITY COACH CarnellSmith.com
This is about a god complex people have. Not the children.. I hate to hear these women lie like this. It breaks every strand of faith i could have in them, and reminds me to look to God. Because women want no responsibility for choosing the wrong dude... Then regretting it. God Loves Children, And they use them.
Thanks for commenting Kevin. Fortunately, all women are not like this and there are virtuous women with integrity that would NOT participate in the methods that lead to paternity mysteries.
My friends Dennis and Morgan were married men, that faced the same challenges with unjust laws that refused to use true facts in the Family Court.
It appears that some states interpret "best interest means the man's right against slavery or involuntary servitude will be ignored'. Note - the Judge stripped Morgan Wise of all parenting time after DNA confirmed 3 of 4 kids from his wife are not his biological kids.
Warn the men and parents of teen boys that Paternity Fraud exists. CarnellSmith.com
Gender slavery..
This is how women will fix their problems in socialist USA. Soon...
What pathetic announcers, laughing at the plate of other men
This is true!
I just went to see a lawyer yesterday. Turns out my 19yr old daughter isn’t my biological child.
I was told nothing could be done.
This is disgusting of our criminal governments.