Head Gravity Pro 2023 Review | Rackets & Runners

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 159

  • @PrecisionPointTennis
    @PrecisionPointTennis 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    After not being able to find a more controlled racket than my trusty Head PT10 mids , I finally found its modern replacement!!! I bought two of the Gravity Pros and no customisation needed. Added Alu power at 20/19 (44 / 42 pounds) a head worm dampener smartsorb: and it’s a magic wand!!!!! Thanks again for your review. You sold me on it!

  • @PrecisionPointTennis
    @PrecisionPointTennis ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Now I think (because of you) that this shall become my next racket. Thanks. Excited to demo it 😊

    • @PrecisionPointTennis
      @PrecisionPointTennis 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just bought 2!!!

    • @Olly_2024_
      @Olly_2024_ หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thoughts on the racket?

  • @krautfox9818
    @krautfox9818 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Really loving your review style, you got your own thing man, keep it up !

  • @Anjays
    @Anjays ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow so informative! Great job, love the strings

  • @mikepotapa5773
    @mikepotapa5773 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review. I’m trying to decide which gravity to use. I have the Gravity MP coming this weekend to demo. I’m 41 years old and currently using the pure drive but it’s giving me some arm/wrist issues so I want a more comfort racquet. I have trouble deciding if the MP, Tour, or Pro would be right for me.

  • @john2lhotalify
    @john2lhotalify ปีที่แล้ว

    can't wait for it to drop! thx for this review!

  • @yatuducheeez
    @yatuducheeez ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice review! Played several months with the previous version, absolutely loved it and still have it in my bag, but can't manage to be consistent on my topspin OHBH. All other shots were great. Currently trying to return to a smaller headsize for my backhand but miss the feel of this one.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Unfortunately, if you struggled to generate consistent spin with the 360+, there won't be a major improvement with this one. Yes, it's a little more maneuverable, but not much, so the same issues you had back then will probably still arise.
      A racket that's flown under the radar but is a bit of a hidden gem is the Auxetic Prestige MP. Smaller head size than the Gravity and similar feel.

    • @yatuducheeez
      @yatuducheeez ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RacketsRunnersVancouver currently trying a customized 360+ radical mp. Shots come out great but it's a bit stiff for my taste. I'll test softer strings and see how it goes. Thanks for the recommendation, I'll look into demoing the new prestige mp!

  • @bigstusoccer
    @bigstusoccer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude! I listened to your racquet string combo suggestion for gravity pro and it is so sexy with the champagne strings. I'm a total beginner and don't really know that much but I'm going to learn how to use this thing lol. I'm 6'2 195lbs and so far hasn't fatigued me to much.

  • @bigdaddy812
    @bigdaddy812 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Luca - do a review on MP XL please. I am curious as your thoughts on it. It feels like a cheat code from the baseline and on serve. Dead serious. I use both Pro and XL and can’t decide which is my go to. I love them both.

  • @fingersm
    @fingersm 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Just demoed one for a week and this raquet is so good!!
    And agree past pro’s felt very clunky

  • @javierlombardo6213
    @javierlombardo6213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i bought it cause of you,coming froma dunlop cx200 tour 18 x 20,

  • @solyomandras
    @solyomandras ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video. I went for the Tour version because of lower static weight and slightly thicker beam. That was also my thought that the Gravity Pro is the Pro Tour 630 made for the modern game.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the reason I went for the 360+ Tour.
      It adds up to me, plus it's backed up by the amount of pros using this thing.

    • @solyomandras
      @solyomandras ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RacketsRunnersVancouver I am not aware if anyone is playing with he Gravity apart from Rublev and Zverev.

    • @odil50
      @odil50 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@solyomandras Safiullin and Basilashvili for example

  • @fanofmany71
    @fanofmany71 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Currently demoing the Gravity Pro and Pro Staff 97. Always been a Pro Staff player, but perhaps Gravity Pro will overthrow Pro Staff. Great reviews.

  • @kikibeldandy
    @kikibeldandy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After debating for a long time between tour n pro, i got the pro.

  • @brunoalves3736
    @brunoalves3736 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing review as always! I finally got to try the gravity MP, and although it feels very similar to my V, core, pro 100, I really liked it. It could be a potential switch for me, I only felt a little bit unstable when playing big hitters, I think some weight at 3& 9 will make the raquet play really well. When you customized yours, did you just add it to the handle?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks Bruno! Glad you liked the racket. That's a pretty seamless transition from the Pro 100. I try to do as little customization when reviewing stock rackets, so yes, for the MP, it was only a leather grip.
      That said, I played around with the previous MP quite a bit and weight at 3 and 9 made that frame absolutely amazing. Any swing weight between 325 and 330 seemed to be the sweet spot there.

  • @grantroberts2870
    @grantroberts2870 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great review ! loving the gp with some extra lead tape at 10/2 - thinking about 40/42 on solinco hyper g 1.30 next set, yonex poly tour pro 1.25 currently very nice. best serves and surprising spin for an 18x20. swing and send it !

    • @michaelsigurdson3878
      @michaelsigurdson3878 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I use Signum Pro Firestorm at 45 pounds. Puré magic !
      You have to try

  • @EdmonBegoli
    @EdmonBegoli ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your enthusiastic reviews are great.
    Is this now your racquet of choice?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! I'm still not sure. I've been playing with so many rackets since accelerating the content on this channel but releases are slowly settling down so it may be time to figure out my new racquet of choice. Gravity Pro is up there, so is the Aero 98, Shift 300 and a couple of others...

  • @matheustardivo
    @matheustardivo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review, thanks! I'm playing with the Wilson Blade v8 18x20 and love it, but now I'm really interested in trying the Gravity Pro. How would you say these two rackets compare with each other?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you! They are perfect rackets to compare head to head. In terms of precision and control they're both very similar and absolutely elite. The big difference is going to come in swing speed; the Gravity is slower and the Blade faster but when you do get the Gravity up to speed, it's much more powerful.

  • @vanodne
    @vanodne ปีที่แล้ว

    Dang it, I've come back to this old video because I am a 360+ GPro user that could use a little more maneuverability, but I am waffling between an upgraded Gravity and a Boom Pro. I need a comparison video, please!

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll add it to the list, but it probably won't be for a bit of time!

  • @benjaminjensen111
    @benjaminjensen111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Correction:
    The spiral fibers in the shoulders should still be there (Graphene Inside is new name for 360+). The "Auxetic" is in the yoke/bridge. The Auxetic tech actually stiffens the racket up at ball impact. The harder the hit, then the stiffer the racket at impact.

  • @adriellepretre9047
    @adriellepretre9047 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought a Shift 300. It’s been recent so I still can’t say if it will be my racket of choice. I’m going to try different strings and tensions.
    I’m a baseliner who hits with topspin and a one handed backhand.
    In theory a 95-98 inch frame is better for a one handed backhand .
    So, how would you compare the Shift with the Gravity Pro in terms of spin, feel, control an overall quality?
    I would like to love the Shift but these reviews like this one makes you second guess or brings on a dilemma or temptation.
    I usually whip my racket so heavy rackets give me a bit of trouble though.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      It sounds like the Shift will be much better for you. It's a much quicker racket through the air (quicker than the 99 square inch head size would suggest), whereas the Gravity Pro is noticeably slower.

  • @Shrek29948
    @Shrek29948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Luca, my current racquet is the Head Youtek Graphene Speed pro 18x20 from 2013. I have it strung with tecnifibre black code at 52 pounds. Would the gravity pro play similarly to that racquet? Would the string and tension setup you mentioned do the same? Thanks in advance.

  • @Mikele-ez2jw
    @Mikele-ez2jw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have 2 of the previous version, both matched at 312gr unstrung, love them, the feel , the power and the control. The only issue is that you have to be prepared to handle them for a long match, the weight can be demanding and will not give back easy points, specially on defense when you are tired

  • @chadallen3211
    @chadallen3211 ปีที่แล้ว

    First off... love your reviews. Couple of questions for you if you don't mind. Do you think the Gravity Pro can block back returns as well as the Radical Pro? And in your opinion, would someone with a one handed backhand be able to gel with the Gravity Pro? One more question. How does the Gravity Pro serve compared to rackets like the Radical Pro or V14 Pro Staff 97 which I'm used to playing with? Thanks a lot, and keep up the great reviews!

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! Absolutely the Gravity can block back returns very well; it's extremely stable. I've never developed an adequate one handed backhand but it does seem to be one of those rackets that's tough to use with a one-hander. It's not very whippy so if you flick your wrist through contact it won't be ideal.
      The Gravity is more controlled than the Radical and a bit more controlled than the Pro Staff (but less friendly than both).

  • @Sandro_Z68
    @Sandro_Z68 ปีที่แล้ว

    Need to demo it... Actually I've tested the Tour and loved it; ested Speed Pro and didn't liked at all, tested the Boom Pro and was ok, but the Gravity Tour was far better. My only concern would be the higher weight and swingweight of the Pro as I'm getting older 🤔

  • @nesan_kaikolar
    @nesan_kaikolar ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love this bewhhh racquet I own 2021 gravity pro

  • @snstyvr7597
    @snstyvr7597 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Luca, I love the Yonex Vcore Pro HD (matte green, 20mm beam) and am really liking latest Head Speed Pro for a lighter 18x20 & easier power. Thos new Gravity seems right in the middle weight-wise, head shape, etc. Thoughts / suggestions? Thx. Great job on this channel!

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      That VCORE Pro was an awesome racket. I briefly played with the Speed Pro while I was testing this Gravity and, the Gravity is closer in feel/precision to the VCORE Pro you're using. If you liked those characteristics of the Speed and are really looking for a more noticeable switch up, go for the Speed.

    • @MrFunkyko
      @MrFunkyko ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you end up switching from the HD?

    • @elchanclascocina
      @elchanclascocina ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you go with the Speed Pro? Gravity pro? Other? currently using the Vcore Pro HD myself and I'm looking for a replacement! These are my 2 main options.

  • @robertgarcia2266
    @robertgarcia2266 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "Its not the racket you needed, but the racket you deserved". I should not play with this racket, ill be honest. But i like it so much better then any advance racket i have ever used, just because of feel, comfort and FORGIVENESS. Even if you suck, the racket will get it back. It may be a terrible shot, but a pro staff, radical pro are less forgiving on off center. I had a speed mp and it was less forgiving off center then this racket and i could feel it big time. Now is the gravity heavy hell yeah, be prepared or die because the biggest weakness is racket head speed. So what was hilarious to me, i was using this for a couple days and then picked up the speed mp 2024 "330" sw, and it felt like a toy! haha. I tested both SW of these rackets, 327 Speed MP and 331 for the gravity.

  • @sohankumar9775
    @sohankumar9775 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just love this racquet ... but but ... , I'm just not able to generate enough power on my serves unlike the power on my forehand and backhand .. can you tell me why ? I have Gravity Tour 2023. Tension - 52 lbs , Luxilon Adrenaline 125 String Set . Tx

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not quite sure; perhaps it's due to the more sluggish feel so you can't bring it through the service motion as quickly. Unfortunately, there's not much you can do about that.

  • @dmytrogalakhov5366
    @dmytrogalakhov5366 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you like it more than the 2019/2021 version? I cant decide between the two. Demoed the 2023 version yesterday and loved it! Never tried the 2019/2021 one but i play with 2021 Tour and the feel of Pro 2023 is just another league for me compared to Tour!

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's very close but I prefer the 2023. Agreed that the Pro is in another league...

  • @massimomacera7956
    @massimomacera7956 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congrats on the great review. If I wanted to mount a multifilament which string would you recommend and at what tension? Two of four knots? Thank you.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I would go with a nice soft multi in here, something like Wilson NXT or Tecnifibre X-One Biphase. You can string it up with any tension, but I wouldn't go too tight in an 18x20.

    • @massimomacera7956
      @massimomacera7956 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks a lot ❤️

  • @EdmonBegoli
    @EdmonBegoli ปีที่แล้ว

    @Rackets & Runners, Luka - what kind of string and tension you would recommend for Gravity Pro to maximize the spin and maybe add a bit more power for easier depth?
    I was considering Head Lynx Tour 17 at 48 or a Lynx Tour / Tourna Big Hitter Silver 16 hybrid at 48.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Head Lynx Tour 17 is a fantastic string as it has great feel and a bit more pop than stiffer polys. I really like it @ 49 but don't be scared to go as low as 42-45; I can only see it performing better for the characteristics you're looking for at that tension.

    • @EdmonBegoli
      @EdmonBegoli ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RacketsRunnersVancouver Thanks!

  • @sohankumar9775
    @sohankumar9775 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the reply .. should I change to multifilament strings like Head MLT or Babalot Xcel ? Tx

  • @Maaxx7272
    @Maaxx7272 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, after watching your video I bought my own Gravity Pro Auxetic. I really like the stick but I think the strings that come with the racket are not the best ones and can't feel what you described. Do you think that putting a soft power poly at around 52 pounds is going to make a difference? Thanks

    • @郭1-m1i
      @郭1-m1i 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I use 1.20 or 1.15 shaped poly at lower tension. maybe you could put this set on your list

    • @Maaxx7272
      @Maaxx7272 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@郭1-m1i Thanks, I changed the original strings that come with the racket and it was a huge improvement. I put a new poly at 51

  • @taropb
    @taropb ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. Just wondering how the new Gravity Pro compares the the Head Pro Tour 2.0 (my current racket of choice)? In the video you mention the PT280 so if the Gravity Pro is similar in feel then thinking of making the switch. I love the Pro Tour 2.0 but sometimes find it a bit too demanding (basically not good enough) so was thinking the Gravity Pro would be a slightly more user friendly Pro Tour 2.0? Only consern I have is the manoeuvrebily of the Gravity Pro as I’ve used one in the past and have found it a little sluggish. Think it’s the head shape as I find the Pro Tour 2.0 easier to swing despite being 10g heavier and same balance. Would adding a leather grip to the Gravity Pro help it feel less sluggish? Thanks for your help.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      I have to say the feel is really similar. I haven't played with the 2.0 (only the 280 and 630), and I know that the 2.0 doesn't have Twaron, but I'm assuming beyond that it's probably very similar. There is a really magical pop in the sweetspot that you just don't get with most rackets. To me the Gravity Pro is basically a modern version of a Pro Tour 280. It's more forgiving, more powerful and more spin-friendly but still has most of the classic elements of a frame like that.
      It's a more sluggish racket than average, that's its biggest downside. You can add a leather grip to make it more headlight which could make it feel whippier, but you're still adding weight so take that with a pinch of salt. The head shape is what makes it so special in lots of ways, but it's also the main reason it's slower than other player's frames. That's unfortunately never going to change.
      I know I just threw out a lot of info there but I hope you get the gist 😅

    • @taropb
      @taropb ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the detailed response and that’s exactly what I wanted to hear about the Gravity Pro. It reassures my initial thoughts on it and looks like this will be my next racket. The Pro Tour 2.0 is very similar to the 280 / 630 but just a little bit stiffer and a slightly lower swing weight making it a bit more user friendly. Which I like but need something even more user friendly than the 2.0 so looks like it’s the Gravity Pro. Wish I was good enough to just use the 280 / 630 as they’re such nice frames. Thanks for all your help and keep up the great work with the reviews.

  • @medianera2008
    @medianera2008 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Luca, you prefer Lynx tour for Gravity pro. Are there any differences between the orange and champagne Version?

  • @christophersheldon7088
    @christophersheldon7088 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Head 280...OR the Head Classic MP? Either way, great review.
    Keep it up bro. The subscriber tsunami is coming!

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! The 280 is the only true 90s Head frame I know but I'm always monitoring the classifieds for more. Thanks for the feedback, means a lot to hear positive things.

  • @medianera2008
    @medianera2008 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Luca, which String and tension do you prefer for the Gravity pro. I have one and don‘t like Hawk Touch.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lynx Tour will give you a bit more bite and RPM Rough way more spin from string snap back.

  • @chungj26
    @chungj26 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for doing this review. Quick question, how would compare Yonex Percept 97D/100D to gravity pro? Thanks in advance.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      I actually haven't played with either of the 18x20s yet 😭

    • @chungj26
      @chungj26 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RacketsRunnersVancouver Thanks for the reply. When you do, could you make a quick mention of how they compare? Thanks!

  • @호열-p1m
    @호열-p1m 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello, what's the string and tension you used for Gravity Pro

  • @pakchu2
    @pakchu2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since 16x19 rackets are more spin friendly, doesn't that give them more control than 18x20 frames in the form of topspin?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was wondering when people would start asking that question... In tennis, control has TRADITIONALLY been looked at as soft directional control - basically the ability to guide a ball where you want it to go not contingent on spin - but nowadays, spin is obviously used to control powerful groundstrokes so yes, spin definitely is a part of control. Still, when most people talk about control in tennis, they're still referring to the more traditional control, and I think I'll keep it that way in my reviews for now.

  • @steveschaeffer5999
    @steveschaeffer5999 ปีที่แล้ว

    I used to play with the Pro Tour 280 back in the day. I am considering switching to either the new Pro Staff V 14 or the Gravity Pro. I like a classic feel and control and i have a one handed backhand. The smalller head size of the Pro Staff appeals to me but the low RA and thin beam of the Gravity Pro appeals to me. Which would you recommend?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you want a current racket with the closest feel to the Pro Tour 280, this is it. If you're looking for a more modern, spin-friendly experience, and quite a bit more maneuverability on that one handed backhand, you can't go wrong with the 97. They're both fantastic and worth a demo if you can.

  • @josej.jr.5614
    @josej.jr.5614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it possible to customize the MP and bring it closer to the playability (stability and plow through) of the Pro version?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, definitely. It has a different beam profile but adding weight will make it about as close as you can get.

  • @medianera2008
    @medianera2008 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you customized your GPro? Or do you play it in stock form?

  • @mariusklenner2485
    @mariusklenner2485 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im a 3.0 -3.5 player (playing for 2,5 years, once a week just with a friend - no competitive yet).
    33year old male.
    I like to hit big from the baseline more, than rushing through the net.
    I’m trying to play with spin but I’m not the best spin player of my technique. So if I try to hit winners, I often shoot em too flat and they are going too long - out.
    I’m actually playing the 2023 head extreme mp, because I thought „if I’m not good enough to generate spin with a good technique, maybe the extreme mp can help me with it.
    But now I’m thinking, maybe I need a more control friendly racket.
    I’m thinking of the speed or the gravity line.
    But I don’t know which is better for me and which model i should take (MP, Tour, Pro of gravity or speed)
    What do you suggest me to get?

    • @captainbrewsk1
      @captainbrewsk1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m a pretty similar player on my journey of finding a racket. Of the ones I’ve tested so far (Radical MP, Radical Pro, Gravity Tour, Extreme MP, Ezone 100, Percept 97) the Gravity Tour was a standout winner in terms of feel and control. I had way more confidence with it which helped me keep the ball in better as my technique improved. The next best were the Extreme MP and Radical MP but I didn’t feel that they were as forgiving.
      I’d recommend testing them back to back every 15 minutes or so to see which you like best!

    • @mariusklenner2485
      @mariusklenner2485 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Im curious if the extreme tour would be a good compromise.
      Its more control oriented than the mp cause of thinner frame and a little smaller headsize but I guess it wouldn’t be as much controllable as the gravity cause it’s still a spin racket

  • @dinhthienhcm
    @dinhthienhcm ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello,
    I'm torn between this and the MP. Is the weight difference that much of a deal?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it is a very different racket and not only just because of the weight. The Pro is much more difficult to use so you should demo it first.

  • @elchanclascocina
    @elchanclascocina ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was really happy with the review until you said you are a solid 4.0... I thought that was solid 4.5, but now I'm scratching my head thinking, maybe I'm not the 4.5 I thought I was but a soft 4.0😢

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't worry, my game looks better on camera than it translates to results in person 😅

  • @glademaster
    @glademaster ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are you sure the new Pro has a lower Swing Weight? Or is yours just under spec?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We don't have any confirmation from Head, but what I can say is that I test A TON of the 360+ Pro in hopes of finding a couple under 332 and pretty much every single one came in at or over the 334 mark (with some pushing mid 340s). With the new version, we've tested 5 different frames strung with different set-ups and they averaged out to 330, with the highest at 333. I think they've lowered target swing weight by 3-4 points and that the spec tolerance range is less severe.

  • @orientalwoodworks
    @orientalwoodworks ปีที่แล้ว

    For you is it the 2021 pure Drive or 2023 gravity pro. I know they’re different rackets but as far as power, stability, and forgiveness goes, what is your suggestion?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be honest, these are too different to compare but are both fantastic in their own right. Obviously the gravity will be more stable than the pure drive, but the pure drive is still a remarkably stable racket for something so light. At this point I would say demo the two and it will be pretty easy to figure out which one you mesh with because they are so different.

    • @theruralkings
      @theruralkings ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks@@RacketsRunnersVancouver

  • @rsm0600
    @rsm0600 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought one. Which tension would you recomend with the co-polyester weiss cannon ultra cable?

  • @austin1123
    @austin1123 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been waiting for this review! Thinking of switching but I have a one handed backhand and I’ve heard it can be hard to maneuver. I’m questioning if I can get use to it… thoughts ?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I think you can get used to it and it's more maneuverable than previously, so certainly worth a demo. If this helps at all, it's less manoeuvrable than something like a Blade or a Prestige.

  • @LeonardoRembischewski
    @LeonardoRembischewski 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Luca! Amazing content. How does the gravity play against the Radical pro 23?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! They are very different rackets. The Gravity feels much more traditional but the Radical is more whippy and spin-friendly.

  • @cristianoxavier8979
    @cristianoxavier8979 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can You compare With Wilson Blade 18x20?

  • @oopsjunpyo
    @oopsjunpyo ปีที่แล้ว

    thx for great review! let me know the string that u use on gravity pro :)

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you! I mostly used Babolat RPM Rough 17, but also tried Head Lynx Tour 17. Both were great.

  • @КириллПономаренко-ц6п
    @КириллПономаренко-ц6п ปีที่แล้ว

    Tell me how you can improve head gravity mp 2021?
    extra weight in the handle?

  • @5ammy13
    @5ammy13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lol, I am not American, and I really find this NTRP system confusing. I see 4.0s and 4.5s who are definitely not as good as you. And then when you say that you are a 4.0-4.5, it blows my mind.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't compete very much these days so I am probably a level under what you see on film.

  • @tennistaxi
    @tennistaxi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been looking at the Yonex Percept 97. Any advice as to how this compares

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the new Top 5 Control Rackets, I talk about these two quite a bit.

  • @킹식-z8y
    @킹식-z8y 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you recommend it for Western forehand as well?

  • @ls21989
    @ls21989 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which do you like better, Head Gravity Auxetic or Wilson Shift?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      Tough question! It's funny because, those are probably my two favourite rackets, but they are so different (at least the Gravity Pro and Shift 300), but both such incredible rackets. We'll do a roundup of 2023 frames in a future video.

  • @J-dog2023
    @J-dog2023 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please help. I'm about to order this racket but I've seen some videos saying that it's a heavy racket. I am using right now the head TIS6 which is super light is this gonna be way too heavy? The reason I wanted to get this is because of the new technology And because the beam is only 20 mm. The one on the TIS6 is way too thick and gets in the way of my backhand slices. Should I still order it? Is there anything I can do about the heaviness maybe give a little weight towards the back? Or is there a different racket similar to this one that is lighter? Thanx so much!!!

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It will probably be much to heavy, unfortunately. If you want an easier transition away from something like the Ti.S6, go for something like the Babolat Pure Drive.

  • @fernandoponcemata650
    @fernandoponcemata650 ปีที่แล้ว

    What strings are the ones you have on the racket in the video?

  • @wilsoch
    @wilsoch ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does this compare to the new Pro Staff X? I really like the X, to my surprise -- great feel, good power, versatile. I would think the X has more power, and a bit less control?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      The X has quite a bit more power, and the Gravity Pro a lot more control. They are both very solid and stable, and both lack similarly in maneuverability.

  • @mustafamohamadhaidar966
    @mustafamohamadhaidar966 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What string do you recommend for this racquet and what tension

  • @giovannimascolo7075
    @giovannimascolo7075 ปีที่แล้ว

    what do you think about players with 1 handed backhand with gravity pro?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      From what I know about 1 handed backhands (mine is atrocious), players usually like a more whippy/manoeuvrable frame. This won't be ideal, but it won't be that bad.

  • @yelloweskimoeyes
    @yelloweskimoeyes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn't the RA 63?
    Mp is 58.

  • @mustafamohamadhaidar966
    @mustafamohamadhaidar966 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are the strings on this racquet

  • @nicolaze9593
    @nicolaze9593 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do Gravity Tour.. planning to get the Tour.

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish we could, but they aren't available in Canada 🥲. The old one is my racket of choice.

  • @mteca5093
    @mteca5093 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sand under the grommets to remove only couple grams but SW DROPS like 5 points

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't really do that to our demos but I've been very tempted on a lot of frames...

  • @tennis-fan
    @tennis-fan ปีที่แล้ว

    Please review extreme mp 360+ or auxetic😮

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll definitely look to include the Auxetic in a video at some point soon!

  • @kieranboulton3833
    @kieranboulton3833 ปีที่แล้ว

    What strings and tension did you use?

  • @ieteke30
    @ieteke30 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HEAD Gravity MP 2023 or Wilson blade 100 V9?

  • @Valeriothedreamer
    @Valeriothedreamer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pls what string you suggest ??

  • @AlexTennisChannel
    @AlexTennisChannel ปีที่แล้ว

    I also released a review today about the Gravity Pro! I think pretty much the same thing as you do!!

  • @makcyeap
    @makcyeap ปีที่แล้ว

    I even doesnt start to watch but i have question - is it better with leather grip on it?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you are able to handle the extra static weight then, yes, I think it's even better, but it doesn't NEED it like some rackets do because it's already so stable stock.

  • @vendetta1340
    @vendetta1340 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which is better pro or tour?

    • @RacketsRunnersVancouver
      @RacketsRunnersVancouver  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I prefer the Pro's feel but the Tour is more user-friendly.

    • @vendetta1340
      @vendetta1340 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RacketsRunnersVancouver thanks!

  • @nutrifelipenoronha
    @nutrifelipenoronha 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gravity pro or 100D?

  • @vendetta1340
    @vendetta1340 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gravity pro vs ezone tour?

  • @ThesGt
    @ThesGt ปีที่แล้ว

    pro or mp?

  • @Barlo97
    @Barlo97 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gravity pro or blade 98v8 18x20. What do you prefer?

  • @e.b.9178
    @e.b.9178 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I tried the Gravity Pro 2021 and it was so demanding for me ( I am intermediate player over 40y of age). If you have good body movements and able to generate your own power, this racquet might be good for you! But if you want help from the racquet, then look somewhere else as this racquet will make bad shots when you are in off-position and looking for help from the racquet.

  • @edselhegmon133
    @edselhegmon133 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not a bad review

  • @megzy184
    @megzy184 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AUXETIC!!

  • @devinmoose
    @devinmoose 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You're definitely not a 4.0 player Luka/Luca, you're a 4.5-5.0.