As a BlueDrake42 subscriber since his Project Reality days I gotta say: 1. Game is very raw from the footage so far 2. I have it in my Steam library since launch, but haven't played it yet 3. As a recording engineer I listened to gun sounds, and gun sounds are missing a LOT of low frequencies and don't sound great in midrange and hi-range of frequencies. I offered BlueDrake42 offer to mix the sounds, but so far I haven't received any replies. 4. I genuinely wish this game success and BlueDrake42 for his dedication to FPS communities. 5. In current state the game is not too alluring to me, just watching reviews I see a lot of glaring "issues", like low res textures, and thin gun sounds. 6. I am spoiled by games such as Insurgency Sandstorm, Squad and Ground Branch. BUT I am also aware how much Squad has progressed over the years, I saw it. Sandstorm was a great product from the get go. Ground Branch is in perpetual Beta state. 7. Operation Harsh Doorstop has can go leaps and bound, but it will unlikely to reach Arma 3 levels of complexity, but it can try to get to Battlefield 4 complexity levels, and mimic elements of Squad and Ground Branch. 8. It's just too raw to call a complete product, I can easily wait for how it goes further and play it later. 9. Games like Siege saw a huge improvement and also regress of tactical elements. R6 Siege started as pretty hardcore tactical shooter, and turned into Valorant with special abilities, with pizza face skins, and character models dressed as Rick and Morty, or full blown rat. Appealing to little kids, even though this is Rated Mature. Which it is now for the kids. I would rather play Squad or Insurgency at the current state, but I have huge hopes for vehicular warfare in OHD, but that is some ways to go. Even Squad lacked actual vehicles during release, and ambitions of Insurgency were scrapped to only infantry fighting playstyle. Which is a shame. I wanted to fly the heli like the trailer showed.
Casual Squad/HLL milsim player here. I have enjoyed OHD so far and will keep playing it because it's fun in it's own way, but you said it spot on , the game is in pretty rough shape and need polished up a lot. Bluedrake and his team seem pretty engaged and committed and I have faith they'll get the game where it deserves to be. As far as the ARMA comparison, not everyone want's ARMA levels of complexity, not everyone has time for it or enjoys it being so demanding. Insurgency is like the perfect balance to realism/simplicity. I feel like most players want a that balance. Like I hate arcade shooters like COD/Battlefield with how cartoonish it is, but I don't want to have to dedicate a whole day or several hours for a single game. I will say the audio on the game I feel is pretty nice and is the reason I like the game so much.
@@KW-cm5sg I hear you, Arma 3 is very intimidating in many ways. Even for seasoned gamers. I root for BlueDrake, I think community will be together on this one (as far as development goes). Did you see that heli asset someone modded already?
@@righteousone8454 I think we should all root for him. There's high expectations which sets a good standard, and I feel he's up to the task. I guess time will tell. No I haven't seen the heli mod, I'll have to check it out!
Almost all assets in the game including sound are made by the OHD team internally. This is because if they didn't, there would be big copyright issues due to their mod tools. If they had just used pre existing assets it would not have taken 2 years to get here.
People hate it because its free and it kinda works. People are used to pay 70 bucks for something that crashes for no reason. It gives u that abusive like relationship.
No, they are used to having rightful entitlement to a finished product. But that's with paid products only. They take the fact that criticism is valid even if it's free, and conflate it into expectations that should not exist, and that's why in the majority of those critique videos the person on the mic sounds entitled. That's why they hate it. Because they have no reason to complain, yet they want to. Notice I said complain, not critique/give feedback. A lot of these people pretend to want to make the game better, but actually just wanna shit on it.
I have seen nothing but love for this project. In fact if the people who say good things about this game didn't also say people were saying bad things about this project I wouldn't even know people said bad things about this project.
The 96 players online atm and 150 24 hour peak shows just how many people actually "love" it as it is. Probably 10 of them if even that are even capable or willing to make a mod. The game is dead.
If you check the discussions tab on steam drake has been getting trolled by many commenters because he tends to respond angrily. If he didn't respond so much I bet there would be less hate. Also there was the issue of hackers, that was the only real big problem killing interest in the game. All the other flaws are forgivable because its free and still being worked on.
FYI they have building, land vehicles and air vehicles working, but those are being held back to put in automatic mod downloading upon server join, to remove all friction from playing. Priority after that will likely be implementing easyanticheat, now that it's free.
@@TheBanana93 Yes we have stated that this is Pre-Alpha Early Access, that means all features are not in yet. No one on the dev team has said this is a finished product. If you were expecting it to be a "Finished Game", then you have not been paying attention.
@@Pinstripedood make sure you double check your default input device on windows. Mine got messed up since the last time I checked, and nobody could hear me ingame
I literally heard one other person in 2 hrs ahaha I didn't think it worked. Its all the zoomers who don't know how to talk to people! It drives me insane when people don't talk or respond in games. F k off go play single player
My only complaint so far is the blueberries need to be way bigger and you should be able to see them at a distance. But I CANNOT wait to see what the future holds for modders.
For me its a little more realistic when you cant tell friend from foe at a distance and you need to learn them by outfits and check map for places where you teammates havent reached.
@Jorma E I mean I get that. I'm just not a fan of not being able to tell who my teammates are at 100 yards and almost every game I was getting into every gun was iron sights. I know I probably had 50 friendly kills and had been killed 50 times by Friendly's. I know atleast 100 times throughout the day i would leave my spawn and be taking on fire from my spawn. I just like how squad does it with the gamer tags.
@@xxsoiiiboiiixx Unrealistic. What is realistic is friendly fire. Also, it's disabled. You were never killed by friendlies because every single server disabled friendly fire due to the hackers.
while yes they are giving the community the tools to make the game great, they are using all the limited funds to do as much as they can for the base game
This totally free to play community project deserve nothing but love. There is other disastrous games like Tarkov charging 80+ dollars to be a beta tester and people seems to swallow it and play them. Gamers dont make sense.
Its a free game, a open source completely mod friendly, its like a Gmod FPS, and it has quality (Graphics, models, gunplay, sounds...), playing player vs player feels a lot like Squad (against bots its bad lol) i think people must have this attributes in mind, the more people know this game, the more modding interest there will be. Its a open plataform with quality, imagine the possibilities! Support the devs, you are playing their work for free (message to everyone not specificly to the video's author)
I see this becoming as big as Arma 3 as far as mods go and for how accessable it is. Arma 3 is so fun with mods but the engine is so complicated creating new entities. Like the Halo mods on Arma take soooo much time to create the Elites, and just recently added Jackels. OHD should be sooo easy to add new things like full on Halo, Starwars, Warhammer, terminator, predator, aliens, like anything I hope to see. This is like Skyrim to me as well. May not be as complete as Skyrim yet but definitely going to match it in mods
@@phaenix_9846 also, since it has singleplayer, imagine whe we get missions, campaings, in many different wars, with the quality this game has, whats the limit? Imagine (this one is big) recreating a game in it? Like Far Cry 2, BLACK from ps2, Medal of honor from ps1. I hope this project gets the support it deserves
I hate that people are hating on this so much. They don’t understand that the game isn’t finished, and it won’t be as long as the community is still releasing mods for it
If I'm being completely honest they should have marketed OHD as a bare-bones creation kit with basic features/systems for content creation. As it stands right now in Early Access that's essentially all this game really is. I think a lot of the criticism for this project would have been dropped by most people if that was the case. That way you're not looking at this like a game and more so a platform like GMOD or by an even more accurate comparison...Roblox. Hell, even the GECK from Fallout.
I think what flew over your head was the crazy hyped up titles of the videos containing OHD. Been a DayZ player since the start, trust me we know wtf early access is. You clearly don't understand that it doesn't make you immune to criticism / feedback. Lol.
Plus: the devs should make it clearer than day that this is a platform rather than just a game! Most likely people load up the game, see some kind of Squadfield 2, go 🤷♂️ and give it a "meh" rating...
my only problem with it is optimization im getting 40 fps on low settings on a 2060 i dont understand why ... i see a lot people talk about a lot stuff that doesnt matter if they game doesnt run smoothly
Its called early access. Things are not optimized! Honestly early acess games like this has been a thing for a LONG time.... let alone free and people still don't get it. Yeah it might end up crap but right now its not the finished product.... this is like "Hey this is what we had done so far what do you think"
The mods made already for the game are going to make it great. As long as mod support stays for multiplayer, all this game needs is time. The core game is there. Now the devs and modders will add to it. In a year the game will probably have loads more content. If it’s going to be a community based/driven game, said community has to be ready to endure growing pains.
I would really love a new game to play, I can't wait to see where this goes. I want it to be good and be supportive of it because it's being made by someone with a bit more of a soul to them, it's noble.
I agree with Blue's vision. I think ppl keep thinking this is a full fledged game. It's free to play, to mod in many directions. I hope this game proves everyone wrong in the near future.
The thing with anti cheat bludrake has addressed and they are going to add it themselves but also orge server hosters to find solutions too as that is often the best way to avoid hackers, anti cheat is not perfect and often also can be intrusive to the game When it came to people not talking, idk how much squad and Hell let Loose you have played but almost all my experiences with it is that unless you play in a good community server people won't really talk
how to earn by make a game steps: 1. Start crowd Funding 2. create basic avarage game 3. tell the world its compleatly free and community game 4. hire a game modders and developer ( low-entry devs) 5. make paid early aceess as dlc 6. realease the game for free in steam (even if not fully optimized/compleat) 7. let other people mod for the base game and select the good community modder as a game dev( because we need money and w can get it from that early access DLC ) 8. after no one funding it abondend the game 9. repeat this process NB:- also make game subsciption model to get money for every month for log time run
you know whats worst ... everyone developing this are doing it for free... know as "volunteers" but bluedrake whenever he posts a video about it .. all revenue goes his way the people putting in the hard work get nothing .. yes its nice having a free game but having ways for people to contribute money towards is better ... people need money
I doubt it is the Patreon supporters who are most offended by this game. Those who invest in something tend to love it more than those who do not. That's why J-hovah's Witnesses started charging 25 Cents for their literature, because they knew that the recipient would be far less likely to throw it away and instead get around to reading it. Plus, the Patreon supporters have been able to and probably have played the frequently updating Development Build, so they knew that the release date was coming and what the current state of the game was. Fair review. A voice of sanity. Subscribed.
I'm one of Patreon supporter. Just a little surprised that the game has 3 DLCs to sell and that's all. I dont really like sound effects and animtions of current version but i dont think that's very bad. And i know the game will be improved a lot
Jehovah Witnesses don't charge people for their stuff. Maybe like 30 years ago or something, but not anytime within the last 15 years. Source: Was one of them for a long time
@@gorgiablessins3522sdf I thought I made that perfectly clear in the video I posted about this. It was in the EIGHTIES that a couple of Witness Sisters told me this, that they used to ask for a Quarter (or maybe it was a donation of at least a Quarter, though it hardly matters, because the investment is the same).
It's biggest issues involve cheaters, and while I agree with Bluedrake about how anti-cheat isn't cheap, I can't help but stay away until there is some anti-cheat and tools to identify cheaters and whatnot. This game needs a kill feed, because as it currently stands, there's no way to find out who's using a mortar shell hack.
im waiting to see another clickbait bluedrake video saying "THE BEST TACTICAL SHOOTER IN THE WORLD" and its just this game with other peoples mods in the video. they didnt even finish a throwing animation XD but wait wait... let me guess. "if you want a throwing animation, add it in yourself" LOL im sorry, i used to like blue, but he became so annoying with the clickbait bullshit and this annoying "hype any game up and call it the best in the world even if its a scam game" mentality. its a goddamn shame he went full clickbait cause his channel actually use to have quality content. but he became a joke. my opinion of course.
Additionally, he's behaviour on Steam is just childish. Banning anyone who had any fair criticism with the game. And responses like "You can create your own Anti-cheat it's simple" or when there's no servers his answer was "Then rent a new one" - he says he's tired of aggressive monetisation but also he demands money like GIMME, GIMME Check discussions from 16-18 February it's just a guy with a brain of a kid
How would he fix this in your point of view? That would require a paid arrangement with anti-cheat software company, for a free game. And the game is basically a sandbox for modders. I don't think you thought this through.
@@rogerdinhelm4671So by releasing a game you hearby place all the responsibility of moderating it 24/7 on the players instead of ensuring a basic level of anti-cheat is included? This guy sounds like the biggest fucking con-artist in the industry. Gaslighting his supporters into thinking basic shit like not having hackers is their burden to bear. Honestly. What a clown.
Squad launched in early access with far less content than OHD. You who don't know what early access means and must not have played many games like this.
@@Overlord598 Squad launched in 2020, 4 years after early access with loads of content and everything promised. OHD hasn't been launched yet, it was released in early access like Squad in 2016, that's the point you and some others don't seem to understand. Early access games are games that are still in development, they are alpha builds to help developers build their games.
I am aware my guy, but its lazy UI design, the top right in general is consistent to leaving a game, if you have a button that exists the entire game it shouldnt be in the place where typically "exit match" is. Its a minor thing but in game design is a flaw in the UI
@@ResonantRTS no they don't, a lot of games have a second menu that let's you choose where do you wanna exit to. They also put it next to the resume game button so you know that it's to leave the game
Fix the enemy and friendly AI, add some more commands, and expand on the campaigns or mission editors and this game will literally take over and set a new standard for the future.
The quality of work people are expecting from a free title is insane, its not triple A, i don't think its going to have perfect gun sounds and i'm sure some stuff is raw. I've not played it because it doesn't appeal to me but this level of criticism and hate on a project like this is hilarious to me. I understand criticising large issues like balance and gameplay design but cmon we're not gonna expect perfection from indie devs. edit. The criticism i'm referring to is other stuff I've seen not this video or most comments
I have not played nor looked at a whole lot on this game. I have seen the trailer, the store page, and a video by Garbaj. He made a good point saying this 'game' seems to be more of a platform and should be better marketed as such. However the game should have an identity to set it apart from other games; a strong base game if you will. The shooter genre is highly saturated at the moment and modding alone will probably not carry this game. A game not bound by setting should define itself through modes and pacing. From what I've seen the mode is mostly Squad-style conquest. People who want to play that will play Squad or Project Reality. This looks like it is shaping up to be like a slightly more arcade-y Squad or larger Insurgency. It should lean into that and craft some base modes that are fun and unique that highlight the gameplay style. This can be a jumping off point for modders. Give them rulesets, mechanics, and vehicles for them to inspect and play with. Something more than a blank slate that inspires them to think of possibilities. Single player, co-op, or mixed multiplayer is something they could really highlight and expand on. A clear roadmap of features and what to expect could be very useful for showing the audience a direction. The trailer and store page featuring a bunch of soliders just shooting at eachother communicates nothing. Modders will not make your game, but they will remix and reimagine it. Make them say "what if base game, but...". The whole "oh it doesnt have that, but you can add it yourself!" response i saw to many questions rubbed me the wrong way. Make the base game fun, and when players begin to get tired they will think of ways to change or improve it to continue the fun. In the mean time people should have something to play while mods are being developed. While I think I understand the goal, there needs to be a good answer to "what is OHD?" beyond "community, community, community, AAA bad...." And please lower the viewmodel.
The game just doesnt look like it has anything to it. It is a modders paradise, but until it has some really deep and immersive mods that add features like unlocks, progression, base building, sim stuff, medical, etc, it just doesnt seem like it is going to be all that. No hate on Bluedrake, but yeah. Then again, hes said thats what his game is, its made free for modders to go to town on. Sooo, really, I think thats what im waiting for. Some good mods to be added.
Building and land + air vehicles are supposedly done, they're just holding it back until they get mod autodownload on server join working so they can fit that and those features together
I don't know who hates this game, I love the concept so far, and I am amazed that Bluedrake was able to pull it through, working basically for free (yeah, you can't really support a normal commerical game studio on donations). Most of the other "sandbox for modders" games were on par or even worse quality AND asked to pay full prise. Arma 3 asked to pay 40$ just so you could beta-test their game for them and was way worse at release. And by the way, animations in Arma 3 are STILL worse than in this free game, lol. And that sluggish vaulting in OHD? Yeah, you can't do it without mods in Arma, after 10 years(!) since full official release, lol. Most of the Arma "complexity" was always written by modders, mainly ACE. (I am using Arma as a most notable sanbox type of game) Screw Arma - Garry's mod costs 10$ for nothing! Are you serious, people? This is just absurd. And this is basically analog on Skyrim Creation Kit on steroids - for some reason nobody whines about it. The game is really just a tech demo for this kit. So I think the right question would be: What made you think everyone hates this game?
I tried to play it twice and both times was in the middle of the most ridiculous spawn camp i ever experienced. some fixes needed for sure, but it looks good imo
People hate it because BlueDrake42 has been a complete intolerable prick since he announced he was working on it, shitting on every other game that came out and constantly comparing them to some mystical project he was working on, and now his project is out and it doesn't feel good at all, I'm a huge fan of the concept, creating an open sourced FPS on the level of squad etc, but the levels of smugness in BlueDrake's voice in every single video since he announced the project (I used to LOVE his content for project reality) have poisoned the community against him I think.
Honestly, its pretty new and not feels like finished, but its okay, no problem! My problem is the low FPS. Cannot keep 144fix yet, thats why i dont play now :)
Really sad by the fact that are some people who see someone's hardwork for free, and decides to cheat, hack and destroy the whole life of the game in it's early access. That proves to me that some of people watching BlueDrake are just there to hate him, destroy his work, do awful things.
Once people start taking care of the hackers and start making really good content for this game i feel like itll over take squad, hell let loose and most other AAA fps milsim type games
i honestly don't understand where this game fits: it's nothing special and, honestly, it's pretty rough. other than this, bluedrake advertised it as a sort of "game that teaches the industry how it's done", which of course it's not. giving the community freedom and pretending that they'll make your game worth a while are two very different things. also there's no point in bragging for months about not having microtransactions when games like Tarkov did it years ago and succeeded.
True, but the difference between games like Tarkov and OHD are the dev teams. This game was made by an INDIE dev team, not the AAA dev teams everyone is used to nowadays. While games like Tarkov succeeded off of micro transactions, there are equally (if not, more) games that are ruined by it. And yes, while it is rough around the edges, it leaves a lot to be desired by the community, especially the modders. Not even a week after Early Access launched and we already have a Starship Troopers mod already...
a fair and sober look at what OHD is and what it isnt, in its current state. While I am deeply concerned about the project it is tiresome seeing so many youtubers shitting on it
I tried to play it and it just ran atrociously, even with my 5600x and 6700 xt. I can handle poor performance, but the 50 fps I was getting is unacceptable given the system I'm running.
It's very important constructive criticism. Let people be as honest as they want without fear of reprisals. Expect malicious attacks. Rough tough industry. Oftentimes games are used by criminal networks to launder money and trade.
If people reviewed gmod as some kind of full release as soon as it came out then they'd come to the same kind of conclusion "You're expected to make your own fun right now & needed more workshop content or built in toolguns" Idk if gmod was ever free and had always piggybacked on HL, CS, TF assets (which isnt a slight) but gmod right now is packed with content. Constructive criticism is key to HD improving but people should also have expectations that are inline with what this title is, not expectatons for a AA or AAA fps straight out of the door. Also thats not even commenting on the completely crash ridden state of MWII release (ghost and suppressor is still fucked, they just broke tac sprint, now fixed) or the massive amount of bugs from other AAA fps launches.
I played it for 10 mins ... less time than it took to download... ugh no ...the short answer is I don't have time for it but I'm sure it would be revolutionary if it came out in the year 2000
Simple Reason: People are spoiled and expect it to be flawless, but forgets the fact that it is for free. They expect it to be released like a paid game, which is laughable.
My question would be..what even is this game suppose to be? Are they remaking Squad from scratch? Theres a ton of milsim tactical shooters out there so being unique is super important. Ready or not is police sim Ground branch infantry focus spec ops sim Squad large scale Arma even larger scale more sim Insurgency tight corner chaotic terrorist smth game Escape from Tarkov hardcore rpg What is OHD suppose to be?? What makes it unique whats the niche..I aint waiting years for a free Squad remake.
When it is finished, it will be all of the above things you mentioned. And it will be free. Which can not be said for any of the games you mentioned. Give it time. All the games you mentioned had time to cook and be devloped over time, you should give the same to OHD. But if its not your thing, then come back later when it has more of the things you want and you may be surprised.
@@PookythePolak I dont hate the game currently, I just dont understand what its trying to achieve. I understand the game has mod support and its free, but lets be realistic it can not literally be jack of all trades..all the games i mentioned took years to make theres no way OHD will somehow remake them for free and be better
@@banoffecake nope there is a way, it can be all that and more, for ex some people make a mod about a quote on quote realistic fight in 4022 on the moon and starships and lazers and all that, now can any of the the games you listed above do that? absolutely not but you are missing the point OHD is a big free sandbox that anyone can make anything they want to whatever degree, and the limitations are your own imaginary and don`t worry the dev team will ofc keep developing the base vanilla game .
@@banoffecake I agree OHD wont be able to be all those games all in one. But several parts of each of those games, yes it can be. Taking all the fun and cool things that made those games fun and enticing. And maybe the modding community will make other cool stuff. As being a small dev team, it will take time, but not impossible.
In defence this is not a game and should not have been described as such. It's a framework intended for others to pick it up and run with it using their own mods.
The use of player made mods to make the game fun won’t work. You’re expecting enough people to download a specific mod to keep a particular server running 24/7? Not possible
its meant to be like squad, just bare bones. let them work out the kinks, squad had numerous years in development while they had around 3 with not nearly as many people working on it and community funded
@@MathianSC2 This is true, that being said I never said OHD was a terrible game, nore did I say it needs togo. What I did say is it's obviously heavily inspired by Squad and the devs seem stuck atm.
Hold breath: Bro just code it in yourself, isn't that the whole point of this game? Gmod doesnt have a hold breath either but games have it plenty of times. Exit game: Bro theres literally a button called "Leave game" and a button called "Exit" lol. Just fucking read. read. Isn't the whole point of this game to make a platform for creating little mini games? Basically like GMOD or like Roblox. It's not a game in it of itself. It's just a platform and you can make games if you're good enough. That's what happens when you make it seem like a normal video game, its the devs fault
Easy, withouth watching - entitled and ungreatful neckbeards will always be mad. Even if its free and in early stages. Games has its problems, yet almost every game on early release has some. From trying out i must say its much better than let's say Enlisted when it first opened.
As a BlueDrake42 subscriber since his Project Reality days I gotta say:
1. Game is very raw from the footage so far
2. I have it in my Steam library since launch, but haven't played it yet
3. As a recording engineer I listened to gun sounds, and gun sounds are missing a LOT of low frequencies and don't sound great in midrange and hi-range of frequencies. I offered BlueDrake42 offer to mix the sounds, but so far I haven't received any replies.
4. I genuinely wish this game success and BlueDrake42 for his dedication to FPS communities.
5. In current state the game is not too alluring to me, just watching reviews I see a lot of glaring "issues", like low res textures, and thin gun sounds.
6. I am spoiled by games such as Insurgency Sandstorm, Squad and Ground Branch. BUT I am also aware how much Squad has progressed over the years, I saw it. Sandstorm was a great product from the get go. Ground Branch is in perpetual Beta state.
7. Operation Harsh Doorstop has can go leaps and bound, but it will unlikely to reach Arma 3 levels of complexity, but it can try to get to Battlefield 4 complexity levels, and mimic elements of Squad and Ground Branch.
8. It's just too raw to call a complete product, I can easily wait for how it goes further and play it later.
9. Games like Siege saw a huge improvement and also regress of tactical elements. R6 Siege started as pretty hardcore tactical shooter, and turned into Valorant with special abilities, with pizza face skins, and character models dressed as Rick and Morty, or full blown rat. Appealing to little kids, even though this is Rated Mature. Which it is now for the kids.
I would rather play Squad or Insurgency at the current state, but I have huge hopes for vehicular warfare in OHD, but that is some ways to go. Even Squad lacked actual vehicles during release, and ambitions of Insurgency were scrapped to only infantry fighting playstyle. Which is a shame. I wanted to fly the heli like the trailer showed.
Everytime I read "raw" I read it in Gordon Ramsey's voice. I blame Civvie11 for that XD
Casual Squad/HLL milsim player here. I have enjoyed OHD so far and will keep playing it because it's fun in it's own way, but you said it spot on , the game is in pretty rough shape and need polished up a lot. Bluedrake and his team seem pretty engaged and committed and I have faith they'll get the game where it deserves to be. As far as the ARMA comparison, not everyone want's ARMA levels of complexity, not everyone has time for it or enjoys it being so demanding. Insurgency is like the perfect balance to realism/simplicity. I feel like most players want a that balance. Like I hate arcade shooters like COD/Battlefield with how cartoonish it is, but I don't want to have to dedicate a whole day or several hours for a single game. I will say the audio on the game I feel is pretty nice and is the reason I like the game so much.
@@KW-cm5sg I hear you, Arma 3 is very intimidating in many ways. Even for seasoned gamers. I root for BlueDrake, I think community will be together on this one (as far as development goes). Did you see that heli asset someone modded already?
@@righteousone8454 I think we should all root for him. There's high expectations which sets a good standard, and I feel he's up to the task. I guess time will tell. No I haven't seen the heli mod, I'll have to check it out!
And also the fact that they rely on donations and people volunteering to help program the game
Almost all assets in the game including sound are made by the OHD team internally. This is because if they didn't, there would be big copyright issues due to their mod tools. If they had just used pre existing assets it would not have taken 2 years to get here.
marketplace assets allow you to re distribute
the street cars are from marketplace
:)
@@ShadowHawk69420 Some do*
That would've costed a lot wouldn't it
We did everything in house. There may be some trash or debris items that are marketplace but even that’s slim at this point.
the UE4 marketplace says otherwise
Thanks for covering it man. It's a labor of love for sure and you were super fair.
Facts this game is so misunderstood
People hate it because its free and it kinda works. People are used to pay 70 bucks for something that crashes for no reason. It gives u that abusive like relationship.
It reminds me of arma reforger lmao
Cyberpunk vibes. And people still defended it, I was amazed!
No, they are used to having rightful entitlement to a finished product. But that's with paid products only. They take the fact that criticism is valid even if it's free, and conflate it into expectations that should not exist, and that's why in the majority of those critique videos the person on the mic sounds entitled.
That's why they hate it. Because they have no reason to complain, yet they want to. Notice I said complain, not critique/give feedback. A lot of these people pretend to want to make the game better, but actually just wanna shit on it.
I have seen nothing but love for this project. In fact if the people who say good things about this game didn't also say people were saying bad things about this project I wouldn't even know people said bad things about this project.
The 96 players online atm and 150 24 hour peak shows just how many people actually "love" it as it is. Probably 10 of them if even that are even capable or willing to make a mod. The game is dead.
@@johnmarston2474 Currently over 1k playing right now. 24hr peak was 1600
@@johnmarston2474 i dont know what you are smoking my dude.
If you check the discussions tab on steam drake has been getting trolled by many commenters because he tends to respond angrily. If he didn't respond so much I bet there would be less hate.
Also there was the issue of hackers, that was the only real big problem killing interest in the game.
All the other flaws are forgivable because its free and still being worked on.
@@RazzlionMaybe he's jealous of bluedrake
So he became a hater
FYI they have building, land vehicles and air vehicles working, but those are being held back to put in automatic mod downloading upon server join, to remove all friction from playing. Priority after that will likely be implementing easyanticheat, now that it's free.
"fyi they actually have vehicles, they just don't work, so we ACTUALLY don't have vehicles"
@@dilfonicz how about the mid af buildings? OFP:CWC had better interiors and that was like back in 2002... Smh
@@dilfonicz can you read? They do work, they are just not implemented yet because they're are other priorities.
@@abdou.the.heretic Its almost as if this game isn't finished? hmmm
@@TheBanana93 Yes we have stated that this is Pre-Alpha Early Access, that means all features are not in yet. No one on the dev team has said this is a finished product. If you were expecting it to be a "Finished Game", then you have not been paying attention.
Yeah, I’m surprised how many people don’t use voip. I use it all the time and usually people just haven’t configured it yet.
This is what I struggled with. I couldn't get anyone to respond to me.
@@Pinstripedood make sure you double check your default input device on windows. Mine got messed up since the last time I checked, and nobody could hear me ingame
I literally heard one other person in 2 hrs ahaha I didn't think it worked. Its all the zoomers who don't know how to talk to people! It drives me insane when people don't talk or respond in games. F k off go play single player
VoIP crashes game if people are all talking. Or makes it very hard to play. Dont know why but it does
My only complaint so far is the blueberries need to be way bigger and you should be able to see them at a distance. But I CANNOT wait to see what the future holds for modders.
For me its a little more realistic when you cant tell friend from foe at a distance and you need to learn them by outfits and check map for places where you teammates havent reached.
@Jorma E I mean I get that. I'm just not a fan of not being able to tell who my teammates are at 100 yards and almost every game I was getting into every gun was iron sights. I know I probably had 50 friendly kills and had been killed 50 times by Friendly's. I know atleast 100 times throughout the day i would leave my spawn and be taking on fire from my spawn. I just like how squad does it with the gamer tags.
@@xxsoiiiboiiixx Unrealistic. What is realistic is friendly fire. Also, it's disabled. You were never killed by friendlies because every single server disabled friendly fire due to the hackers.
while yes they are giving the community the tools to make the game great, they are using all the limited funds to do as much as they can for the base game
This totally free to play community project deserve nothing but love. There is other disastrous games like Tarkov charging 80+ dollars to be a beta tester and people seems to swallow it and play them. Gamers dont make sense.
Its a free game, a open source completely mod friendly, its like a Gmod FPS, and it has quality (Graphics, models, gunplay, sounds...), playing player vs player feels a lot like Squad (against bots its bad lol) i think people must have this attributes in mind, the more people know this game, the more modding interest there will be. Its a open plataform with quality, imagine the possibilities! Support the devs, you are playing their work for free (message to everyone not specificly to the video's author)
“Gmod FPS” is the best way I’ve seen someone describe this game
@@wallclock4648literally redundant and at the same time extremely correct xD
I see this becoming as big as Arma 3 as far as mods go and for how accessable it is. Arma 3 is so fun with mods but the engine is so complicated creating new entities. Like the Halo mods on Arma take soooo much time to create the Elites, and just recently added Jackels. OHD should be sooo easy to add new things like full on Halo, Starwars, Warhammer, terminator, predator, aliens, like anything I hope to see.
This is like Skyrim to me as well. May not be as complete as Skyrim yet but definitely going to match it in mods
@@phaenix_9846 also, since it has singleplayer, imagine whe we get missions, campaings, in many different wars, with the quality this game has, whats the limit? Imagine (this one is big) recreating a game in it? Like Far Cry 2, BLACK from ps2, Medal of honor from ps1. I hope this project gets the support it deserves
@@yurivernadsky9947 Re creating games gets people into all sorts of legal issues.... even ancient abandonware!
Who hates it ? I heard a few whiners in game. But it's good. Very good !
TH-camrs mostly, their criticism are valid but way overblown. I'm enjoying it so far.
I hate that people are hating on this so much. They don’t understand that the game isn’t finished, and it won’t be as long as the community is still releasing mods for it
The issue is the lack of even the most basic features that were talked about
because the game is not finish yet,. Can't wait to see the results in 1-2 years time
If I'm being completely honest they should have marketed OHD as a bare-bones creation kit with basic features/systems for content creation. As it stands right now in Early Access that's essentially all this game really is. I think a lot of the criticism for this project would have been dropped by most people if that was the case. That way you're not looking at this like a game and more so a platform like GMOD or by an even more accurate comparison...Roblox. Hell, even the GECK from Fallout.
From what I saw that was how it was marketed
it was!
I think the main thing that's flying over people's head is that the game is EARLY ACCESS, not even fully finished yet.
I suppose that the ability to read and to understand what early access means is, is a little too much to expect from players...
I think what flew over your head was the crazy hyped up titles of the videos containing OHD. Been a DayZ player since the start, trust me we know wtf early access is. You clearly don't understand that it doesn't make you immune to criticism / feedback. Lol.
You must also not realize that this game been in development for a while now and has a lot of basic features missing
Plus: the devs should make it clearer than day that this is a platform rather than just a game! Most likely people load up the game, see some kind of Squadfield 2, go 🤷♂️ and give it a "meh" rating...
Oh common now you can't be real bro, stop using the early access excuse, you release a game when it's finished not when you have 1/4 of it built up.
my only problem with it is optimization im getting 40 fps on low settings on a 2060 i dont understand why ... i see a lot people talk about a lot stuff that doesnt matter if they game doesnt run smoothly
Potato PC gamers are playing with 10 FPS and are enjoying gameplay
I play with my Ryzen 7 5850U and integrated Graphics got 17fps
Its called early access. Things are not optimized! Honestly early acess games like this has been a thing for a LONG time.... let alone free and people still don't get it. Yeah it might end up crap but right now its not the finished product.... this is like "Hey this is what we had done so far what do you think"
The mods made already for the game are going to make it great. As long as mod support stays for multiplayer, all this game needs is time. The core game is there. Now the devs and modders will add to it. In a year the game will probably have loads more content. If it’s going to be a community based/driven game, said community has to be ready to endure growing pains.
I would really love a new game to play, I can't wait to see where this goes. I want it to be good and be supportive of it because it's being made by someone with a bit more of a soul to them, it's noble.
It’s not really a game. It’s more of a platform for ppl to make there own game
I agree with Blue's vision. I think ppl keep thinking this is a full fledged game. It's free to play, to mod in many directions. I hope this game proves everyone wrong in the near future.
The thing with anti cheat bludrake has addressed and they are going to add it themselves but also orge server hosters to find solutions too as that is often the best way to avoid hackers, anti cheat is not perfect and often also can be intrusive to the game
When it came to people not talking, idk how much squad and Hell let Loose you have played but almost all my experiences with it is that unless you play in a good community server people won't really talk
how to earn by make a game
steps:
1. Start crowd Funding
2. create basic avarage game
3. tell the world its compleatly free and community game
4. hire a game modders and developer ( low-entry devs)
5. make paid early aceess as dlc
6. realease the game for free in steam (even if not fully optimized/compleat)
7. let other people mod for the base game and select the good community modder as a game dev( because we need money and w can get it from that early access DLC )
8. after no one funding it abondend the game
9. repeat this process
NB:- also make game subsciption model to get money for every month for log time run
you know whats worst ... everyone developing this are doing it for free... know as "volunteers" but bluedrake whenever he posts a video about it .. all revenue goes his way
the people putting in the hard work get nothing ..
yes its nice having a free game but having ways for people to contribute money towards is better ... people need money
I doubt it is the Patreon supporters who are most offended by this game. Those who invest in something tend to love it more than those who do not. That's why J-hovah's Witnesses started charging 25 Cents for their literature, because they knew that the recipient would be far less likely to throw it away and instead get around to reading it. Plus, the Patreon supporters have been able to and probably have played the frequently updating Development Build, so they knew that the release date was coming and what the current state of the game was. Fair review. A voice of sanity. Subscribed.
I'm one of Patreon supporter. Just a little surprised that the game has 3 DLCs to sell and that's all. I dont really like sound effects and animtions of current version but i dont think that's very bad. And i know the game will be improved a lot
Jehovah Witnesses don't charge people for their stuff.
Maybe like 30 years ago or something, but not anytime within the last 15 years.
Source: Was one of them for a long time
@@gorgiablessins3522sdf I thought I made that perfectly clear in the video I posted about this. It was in the EIGHTIES that a couple of Witness Sisters told me this, that they used to ask for a Quarter (or maybe it was a donation of at least a Quarter, though it hardly matters, because the investment is the same).
A free game, with the ability to host servers, and mods?
This is what most modern FPS games are missing now days. 😅!!
It's biggest issues involve cheaters, and while I agree with Bluedrake about how anti-cheat isn't cheap, I can't help but stay away until there is some anti-cheat and tools to identify cheaters and whatnot.
This game needs a kill feed, because as it currently stands, there's no way to find out who's using a mortar shell hack.
im waiting to see another clickbait bluedrake video saying "THE BEST TACTICAL SHOOTER IN THE WORLD" and its just this game with other peoples mods in the video. they didnt even finish a throwing animation XD but wait wait... let me guess. "if you want a throwing animation, add it in yourself" LOL
im sorry, i used to like blue, but he became so annoying with the clickbait bullshit and this annoying "hype any game up and call it the best in the world even if its a scam game" mentality. its a goddamn shame he went full clickbait cause his channel actually use to have quality content. but he became a joke. my opinion of course.
Additionally, he's behaviour on Steam is just childish. Banning anyone who had any fair criticism with the game.
And responses like "You can create your own Anti-cheat it's simple" or when there's no servers his answer was "Then rent a new one" - he says he's tired of aggressive monetisation but also he demands money like GIMME, GIMME
Check discussions from 16-18 February it's just a guy with a brain of a kid
Cheaters run rampant and Bluedrake refuses to fix it, is what I've heard.
How would he fix this in your point of view? That would require a paid arrangement with anti-cheat software company, for a free game. And the game is basically a sandbox for modders. I don't think you thought this through.
@@rogerdinhelm4671So by releasing a game you hearby place all the responsibility of moderating it 24/7 on the players instead of ensuring a basic level of anti-cheat is included? This guy sounds like the biggest fucking con-artist in the industry. Gaslighting his supporters into thinking basic shit like not having hackers is their burden to bear.
Honestly. What a clown.
Funfact: Being free to play or early access is not an excuse for releasing a barebones game.
Squad launched in early access with far less content than OHD. You who don't know what early access means and must not have played many games like this.
@@MathianSC2 You're not the first one using Squad as an excuse lol
@@Overlord598 It's not an excuse, it's the reality of how early access games work
@@MathianSC2 So squad releasing with little content means this game can release with little content too? xD
@@Overlord598 Squad launched in 2020, 4 years after early access with loads of content and everything promised. OHD hasn't been launched yet, it was released in early access like Squad in 2016, that's the point you and some others don't seem to understand. Early access games are games that are still in development, they are alpha builds to help developers build their games.
Yes it exits the whole game but there is a button that leaves the session would've noticed if you didn't tunnel vision
I am aware my guy, but its lazy UI design, the top right in general is consistent to leaving a game, if you have a button that exists the entire game it shouldnt be in the place where typically "exit match" is. Its a minor thing but in game design is a flaw in the UI
@@ResonantRTS no they don't, a lot of games have a second menu that let's you choose where do you wanna exit to. They also put it next to the resume game button so you know that it's to leave the game
@@ResonantRTS Nah, you were just a lazy player and didn't bother to look at the menu.
One day Bluedrake will step away from the project and I hope by that time the project will be able to keep itself going by their community.
This is basically Squad but with different modes and maps.
Fix the enemy and friendly AI, add some more commands, and expand on the campaigns or mission editors and this game will literally take over and set a new standard for the future.
At this point it looks like Insurgency Sandstorm, but far worse in every aspect
The quality of work people are expecting from a free title is insane, its not triple A, i don't think its going to have perfect gun sounds and i'm sure some stuff is raw. I've not played it because it doesn't appeal to me but this level of criticism and hate on a project like this is hilarious to me. I understand criticising large issues like balance and gameplay design but cmon we're not gonna expect perfection from indie devs.
edit. The criticism i'm referring to is other stuff I've seen not this video or most comments
*clicks "exit" instead of "Leave Game"*
"Points off!"
My main problem is how the hell do I set ads (hold) to rmb
I have not played nor looked at a whole lot on this game. I have seen the trailer, the store page, and a video by Garbaj. He made a good point saying this 'game' seems to be more of a platform and should be better marketed as such. However the game should have an identity to set it apart from other games; a strong base game if you will. The shooter genre is highly saturated at the moment and modding alone will probably not carry this game.
A game not bound by setting should define itself through modes and pacing. From what I've seen the mode is mostly Squad-style conquest. People who want to play that will play Squad or Project Reality. This looks like it is shaping up to be like a slightly more arcade-y Squad or larger Insurgency. It should lean into that and craft some base modes that are fun and unique that highlight the gameplay style. This can be a jumping off point for modders. Give them rulesets, mechanics, and vehicles for them to inspect and play with. Something more than a blank slate that inspires them to think of possibilities. Single player, co-op, or mixed multiplayer is something they could really highlight and expand on.
A clear roadmap of features and what to expect could be very useful for showing the audience a direction. The trailer and store page featuring a bunch of soliders just shooting at eachother communicates nothing. Modders will not make your game, but they will remix and reimagine it. Make them say "what if base game, but...". The whole "oh it doesnt have that, but you can add it yourself!" response i saw to many questions rubbed me the wrong way. Make the base game fun, and when players begin to get tired they will think of ways to change or improve it to continue the fun. In the mean time people should have something to play while mods are being developed.
While I think I understand the goal, there needs to be a good answer to "what is OHD?" beyond "community, community, community, AAA bad...."
And please lower the viewmodel.
Bro can u help me my PC says direct x 10.0 required error
My biggest gripe with the game is that everyone's hands looks like glistening hotdog meat
The game just doesnt look like it has anything to it. It is a modders paradise, but until it has some really deep and immersive mods that add features like unlocks, progression, base building, sim stuff, medical, etc, it just doesnt seem like it is going to be all that.
No hate on Bluedrake, but yeah. Then again, hes said thats what his game is, its made free for modders to go to town on. Sooo, really, I think thats what im waiting for. Some good mods to be added.
Building and land + air vehicles are supposedly done, they're just holding it back until they get mod autodownload on server join working so they can fit that and those features together
OHD will be a mediocre Jack of all trades, and a master of none
I don't know who hates this game, I love the concept so far, and I am amazed that Bluedrake was able to pull it through, working basically for free (yeah, you can't really support a normal commerical game studio on donations).
Most of the other "sandbox for modders" games were on par or even worse quality AND asked to pay full prise. Arma 3 asked to pay 40$ just so you could beta-test their game for them and was way worse at release. And by the way, animations in Arma 3 are STILL worse than in this free game, lol. And that sluggish vaulting in OHD? Yeah, you can't do it without mods in Arma, after 10 years(!) since full official release, lol. Most of the Arma "complexity" was always written by modders, mainly ACE. (I am using Arma as a most notable sanbox type of game)
Screw Arma - Garry's mod costs 10$ for nothing! Are you serious, people? This is just absurd.
And this is basically analog on Skyrim Creation Kit on steroids - for some reason nobody whines about it. The game is really just a tech demo for this kit.
So I think the right question would be: What made you think everyone hates this game?
I tried to play it twice and both times was in the middle of the most ridiculous spawn camp i ever experienced. some fixes needed for sure, but it looks good imo
The controls are janky, the hackers are common, the maps are too densely packed with stuff, teammates are barely visible
Cause it sucks rn
People hate it because BlueDrake42 has been a complete intolerable prick since he announced he was working on it, shitting on every other game that came out and constantly comparing them to some mystical project he was working on, and now his project is out and it doesn't feel good at all, I'm a huge fan of the concept, creating an open sourced FPS on the level of squad etc, but the levels of smugness in BlueDrake's voice in every single video since he announced the project (I used to LOVE his content for project reality) have poisoned the community against him I think.
Honestly, its pretty new and not feels like finished, but its okay, no problem! My problem is the low FPS. Cannot keep 144fix yet, thats why i dont play now :)
honestly my only issue with the game is trying to find modded servers in the multiplayer
Really sad by the fact that are some people who see someone's hardwork for free, and decides to cheat, hack and destroy the whole life of the game in it's early access.
That proves to me that some of people watching BlueDrake are just there to hate him, destroy his work, do awful things.
Dude finally someone who properly explains the project correctly...
Once people start taking care of the hackers and start making really good content for this game i feel like itll over take squad, hell let loose and most other AAA fps milsim type games
The button the leave the training area is on te left, its the leave game button
Considering how little resources they have, this is very impressive. I got the feeling you already had your mind made up before going into the game.
"If you don't like it, mod it in" -BlueDrake42
Literally just shifting all the load onto the modders, who would rather work on a better game
It’s not even really a game yet, but it is almost impossible to play atm because of hackers and exploiter’s
i honestly don't understand where this game fits: it's nothing special and, honestly, it's pretty rough. other than this, bluedrake advertised it as a sort of "game that teaches the industry how it's done", which of course it's not. giving the community freedom and pretending that they'll make your game worth a while are two very different things.
also there's no point in bragging for months about not having microtransactions when games like Tarkov did it years ago and succeeded.
True, but the difference between games like Tarkov and OHD are the dev teams. This game was made by an INDIE dev team, not the AAA dev teams everyone is used to nowadays. While games like Tarkov succeeded off of micro transactions, there are equally (if not, more) games that are ruined by it.
And yes, while it is rough around the edges, it leaves a lot to be desired by the community, especially the modders. Not even a week after Early Access launched and we already have a Starship Troopers mod already...
a fair and sober look at what OHD is and what it isnt, in its current state. While I am deeply concerned about the project it is tiresome seeing so many youtubers shitting on it
I met the guy he’s trying his best
that exit game moment was so cringe. If only you paid attention and not just instantly tick down.
I think it's less that people hate it as it is they thought it was a game, when in reality it's a modding base tool.
I'd like it a bit more if we had some damned bi-pod mounting and breath holding.
Way better than that unfinished “da Dum Dum da Dum Dum” game
I tried to play it and it just ran atrociously, even with my 5600x and 6700 xt. I can handle poor performance, but the 50 fps I was getting is unacceptable given the system I'm running.
It's very important constructive criticism. Let people be as honest as they want without fear of reprisals. Expect malicious attacks. Rough tough industry. Oftentimes games are used by criminal networks to launder money and trade.
if you consider the background of this project, its really impressive but ofc not finished
The game is also not well optimized, why cant someone make a game like battlefield 2? That game is so well optimized and loved by so many people
If people reviewed gmod as some kind of full release as soon as it came out then they'd come to the same kind of conclusion
"You're expected to make your own fun right now & needed more workshop content or built in toolguns"
Idk if gmod was ever free and had always piggybacked on HL, CS, TF assets (which isnt a slight) but gmod right now is packed with content.
Constructive criticism is key to HD improving but people should also have expectations that are inline with what this title is, not expectatons for a AA or AAA fps straight out of the door.
Also thats not even commenting on the completely crash ridden state of MWII release (ghost and suppressor is still fucked, they just broke tac sprint, now fixed) or the massive amount of bugs from other AAA fps launches.
I played it for 10 mins ... less time than it took to download... ugh no ...the short answer is I don't have time for it but I'm sure it would be revolutionary if it came out in the year 2000
Simple Reason: People are spoiled and expect it to be flawless, but forgets the fact that it is for free. They expect it to be released like a paid game, which is laughable.
It feels like anyone whining about this game are just being paid by AAA devs.
My question would be..what even is this game suppose to be? Are they remaking Squad from scratch? Theres a ton of milsim tactical shooters out there so being unique is super important.
Ready or not is police sim
Ground branch infantry focus spec ops sim
Squad large scale
Arma even larger scale more sim
Insurgency tight corner chaotic terrorist smth game
Escape from Tarkov hardcore rpg
What is OHD suppose to be?? What makes it unique whats the niche..I aint waiting years for a free Squad remake.
When it is finished, it will be all of the above things you mentioned. And it will be free. Which can not be said for any of the games you mentioned. Give it time. All the games you mentioned had time to cook and be devloped over time, you should give the same to OHD. But if its not your thing, then come back later when it has more of the things you want and you may be surprised.
@@PookythePolak I dont hate the game currently, I just dont understand what its trying to achieve. I understand the game has mod support and its free, but lets be realistic it can not literally be jack of all trades..all the games i mentioned took years to make theres no way OHD will somehow remake them for free and be better
@@banoffecake nope there is a way, it can be all that and more, for ex some people make a mod about a quote on quote realistic fight in 4022 on the moon and starships and lazers and all that, now can any of the the games you listed above do that? absolutely not but you are missing the point OHD is a big free sandbox that anyone can make anything they want to whatever degree, and the limitations are your own imaginary and don`t worry the dev team will ofc keep developing the base vanilla game .
@@banoffecake I agree OHD wont be able to be all those games all in one. But several parts of each of those games, yes it can be. Taking all the fun and cool things that made those games fun and enticing. And maybe the modding community will make other cool stuff. As being a small dev team, it will take time, but not impossible.
It feels like a paper thin game or skeleton... that's what it's supposed to be.
You don't like it? You can literally vote on the features and how they are implementing....I've seen probably 3 or 4 poles in as many days on his page
In defence this is not a game and should not have been described as such. It's a framework intended for others to pick it up and run with it using their own mods.
The use of player made mods to make the game fun won’t work. You’re expecting enough people to download a specific mod to keep a particular server running 24/7? Not possible
looks to me like day of infamy 2
All you need is a 4090 with 12000k
the gun sounds are soooo cheap its a major turn off. Maybe there will be an update to make that better
Its not cooked fully
"Leave game"😑😑
also it got an multiplayer modding update
Played it today. Loved it.
It's more like a simulation and I think it's awesome
I enjoyed it when I played with my friends until some guy spin boting ruined the server and since we haven’t played
3:17 there 3 options lol, gotta read
Played last night full of Hackers, like real bad .
It always amazes me how people get a game for free and keep complaining about that
its arma 3 + squad
It's not that it's hated, it's that is too much like Squad yet missing the mark entirely. 😔
its meant to be like squad, just bare bones. let them work out the kinks, squad had numerous years in development while they had around 3 with not nearly as many people working on it and community funded
Squad launched in early access with far less content than OHD.
@@MathianSC2 This is true, that being said I never said OHD was a terrible game, nore did I say it needs togo. What I did say is it's obviously heavily inspired by Squad and the devs seem stuck atm.
the walking, crouching and holding grenates animations are so weird it look like a poor unity game
A gaming pc is too expensive for me. I play on xbox so I can't really try it :(
Hold breath: Bro just code it in yourself, isn't that the whole point of this game?
Gmod doesnt have a hold breath either but games have it plenty of times.
Exit game: Bro theres literally a button called "Leave game" and a button called "Exit" lol.
Just fucking read. read.
Isn't the whole point of this game to make a platform for creating little mini games?
Basically like GMOD or like Roblox.
It's not a game in it of itself.
It's just a platform and you can make games if you're good enough.
That's what happens when you make it seem like a normal video game, its the devs fault
Original Insurgency was way better than sandstorm
Easy, withouth watching - entitled and ungreatful neckbeards will always be mad. Even if its free and in early stages.
Games has its problems, yet almost every game on early release has some. From trying out i must say its much better than let's say Enlisted when it first opened.
the only complain i see is hackers and cheaters
Yeah bros got a patreon
Hate???
because it really inst that good also it is far from hardcore or tactical
Why...cause it sucks....maybe after a few years of Modders improving it, it'll be worth installing.