VW Id Buzz - How far can you go with 110 km/h

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2024
  • www.avp-autoland.de/
    ‪@volkswagen‬ #idbuzz #range #test
    My German TH-cam Channel:
    / @batterylifede
    Become a member for exclusive and early content and behind the
    scene info:
    / @batterylife
    Merch is out as well:
    batterylife.myspreadshop.net/
    If you want to support the Channel
    / batterylifeev
    paypal.me/batterylifeev
    0:00 Intro
    1:41 Let's Go
    2:11 Explanation
    3:51 75%
    4:55 Turn around
    5:18 50%
    6:24 Buzz on a long distance trip
    8:29 25%
    9:25 Arrival
    10:12 Result
    My music in my videos is available at Epidemic sound
    Referral link:
    www.epidemicsound.com/referra...
    Links to my spreadsheets of the cars tested:
    Charge Curve Comparison
    docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    Charging Curve
    docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    EV Consumption
    docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
    Take care
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @simondehaas8784
    @simondehaas8784 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    That range is very similar to what I get from our 58kwh ID3 at similar speed and conditions. Definitely good enough.

  • @oji-chan
    @oji-chan ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the video, short concise and to the point. Look forward to your future videos!

  • @TheEvilmother666
    @TheEvilmother666 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Listening Tool during a roadtrip, this man knows it's cars ánd music!

  • @RedBatteryHead
    @RedBatteryHead ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Like the extra info on the dash. Hope to get OTA for that soon!

  • @davidrunnalls3039
    @davidrunnalls3039 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Interesting video, it would be great to do a run with luggage and passengers, although I have noticed with my Fiat 500e that with two of us and luggage for a weeks holiday it made no difference to range. My thoughts are that what you loose up hill you gain going down. Bjorn Nyland did a test with bottles of windscreen washer fluid and found very little difference in a Kia Soul.

    • @TommyBoay
      @TommyBoay ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Test was made by a french channel using a Hyundai Ioniq 28 - The most efficient car ever built - and drove two of them across town and highway. The first one unloaded with 1 driver, the second with 260 kgs of passengers and luggage (Car is 1595 kgs). It made no difference in any of the sections with an average of 12-13 kwh / 100 kms.

    • @marcusbiller867
      @marcusbiller867 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No difference, physics. On highway at these speeds weight has a marginal role. Wind and air resistance, wet roads and tires. And of course the effeciency of the motor. Weight - about 5% if at that

  • @martymar7465
    @martymar7465 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pretty good consumption nice test.

  • @Progwale
    @Progwale ปีที่แล้ว +2

    HIHI hörst ja auch TOOL

  • @nakfan
    @nakfan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the ride 👍It must be great sitting higher than an ordinary car or even an SÜV.

  • @briangriffiths114
    @briangriffiths114 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've liked the look of the VW Buzz since it was launched although I don't think it would fit in my garage quite as well as my Fiat 500e!

  • @yvs6663
    @yvs6663 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i would call that useful range at a decent compromise when it comes to speed. the consumption isn't small but that is understandable since its a van(they don't exactly get stellar consumption even with a diesel model).

  • @axelpoeschmann2886
    @axelpoeschmann2886 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this interesting test with the good range result under those conditions. My Cargo can do even a bit better because it’s lighter and I’m driving with allweather tires.

  • @davidbrookes9424
    @davidbrookes9424 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best band in the world. Also a great album. 🤘🏼😤🤘🏼

  • @jordskates
    @jordskates ปีที่แล้ว

    This was a very insightful video and these are the speeds I travel at so I found it very useful. I really want an electric car for many different reasons, however the main reason has always been for cheaper fuel. I'm from the UK and my energy company charge me £0.34 per kwh (for me it also isn't any cheaper at night), so this would cost me £26.18 to travel 180 miles. Whereas my 2004 diesel VW touran would get me over 200 miles for the same cost. I think a lot of current electric cars are great for driving around cities where they are much more efficient at lower speeds but as much as I really want an electric car (especially the new ID 2!) I really want to see companies advance there batteries like Tesla, or even like Dyson tried to with solid state packs

  • @Lascarnn
    @Lascarnn ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I really don't think nearly 300 km in winter is bad. Great car IMHO

    • @SNORKYMEDIA
      @SNORKYMEDIA ปีที่แล้ว

      it needs to be incredible for an entry price of £57K. double the price of a transporter

    • @t3chnno
      @t3chnno ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SNORKYMEDIA The £57k base model is also really lacking in equipment. No ACC and automated wipers on a c. £60k car is a disgrace. When I specced one to a semi acceptable level it came out at over £62k 🙃

    • @marcusbiller867
      @marcusbiller867 ปีที่แล้ว

      For the price it is a joke, at these low speeds

  • @MarioDallaRiva
    @MarioDallaRiva ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bravo, Chris.
    Hm, do you think your pups would like the Buzz? Nice and airy cabin.

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, they don't need a lot of space.

  • @failure232
    @failure232 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think it will be useful to add start battery temp

  • @victorfrombcn
    @victorfrombcn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey man, have you thought about doing a range test for the i4 eDrive35? AFAIK no one else has done it before. Looking forward to it…

  • @onlineo2263
    @onlineo2263 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice test. For the price of the Buzz I need a much larger range at 70mph. I like the Buzz, I nearly ordered it until I found out everything is an optional extra such as it only comes with a 10inch screen and you have to pay extra for the 12 inch screen. If the Buzz was £50k with massage seats, 2 tone paint, 12 inch screen then I would have got one regardless of the poor range... But buying a vehicle for more than £50k that doesn't have access to the supercharger network is rather stupid in the UK.

  • @rogeriogomesosorio4755
    @rogeriogomesosorio4755 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:56 Great video. What’s that pool that you have on the back sea
    t with the go pro?

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The pole on the back seat is for the GoPro

    • @rogeriogomesosorio4755
      @rogeriogomesosorio4755 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BatteryLife I saw that. Can you tell me where did you got it?

  • @vincentlehmann646
    @vincentlehmann646 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    outside temperature was around 10 degrees ? i saw , 2 to 5 degrees, does not help for the consumption, not 20 degrees which would be better.

  • @andrewspicer3493
    @andrewspicer3493 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, your final data list says the vehicle has a heat pump, is this correct and if so do all ID Buzz’s have them?

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is correct. You can order it.

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 ปีที่แล้ว

      No heatpump available!

    • @SimonKunddal
      @SimonKunddal ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BatteryLife I have no option to order a heat pump?

  • @gunterrr2302
    @gunterrr2302 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I loved the Buzz until I saw the price. Sorry but this is way too expensive for what it delivers, also considering how limited the range is.

  • @erikjuhlin82
    @erikjuhlin82 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tool!!!😍

  • @mfurmyr
    @mfurmyr ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video. Does it have heatpump?

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes

    • @mfurmyr
      @mfurmyr ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Perhaps I am wrong but ID. Buzz delivered to Norway does not have heatpump.

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      NO!

  • @tobman781
    @tobman781 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    about 300km is ok - nice car

  • @Stewiedude1
    @Stewiedude1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This vehicle really deserved a 100kwh battery

  • @Vxvx22
    @Vxvx22 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The standard 130 kmh test that you do in all EV should also be done here

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว

      If I get the car again, I will.

    • @Vxvx22
      @Vxvx22 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BatteryLife cool

  • @iangreen8682
    @iangreen8682 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why are you driving it on the autobahn in B mode?

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I always drive in B. Since I used Cruise Control it has no impact at all.

    • @iangreen8682
      @iangreen8682 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BatteryLife that's a very good point. I've always put my cupra born into range mode and d and never considered it not having an effect.
      Does it make much difference when coasting downhill?

  • @tesla-spectre
    @tesla-spectre ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video as always. 270Wh/km at only 110kmh, jeez. Yeah yeah I know, a van... but still 300km at that rather low range that is really not great. At 110kmh I want to be able to drive at least 400 if not 500km, because I want to do at least 4-5h on the first leg. In my Model 3 LR I can do 110kmh at 0 Degrees with app. 160 Wh/km flat road. So for a new battery that is 470km, in summer I need 130Wh/km and that means 575km. 🤷‍♂️
    But for others it might be an interesting car. For me it is too expensive for what it is, though.

    • @kreidefelsen
      @kreidefelsen ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This 👆 And as a reminder, the car was completely empty.

    • @tesla-spectre
      @tesla-spectre ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kreidefelsen yeah but that makes little difference ... passengers and normal luggage does not matter much for consumption. it is already bad as it is :)

    • @kreidefelsen
      @kreidefelsen ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@tesla-spectre I highly doubt that! Weight does A LOT of difference to range on every EV. Edit: yes, it is already bad because this thing was empty :)

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@kreidefelsen You are wrong because with those heavy EVs the additional weight is just a minor percentage that contributes to rolling resistance, but at autobahn speeds the air resistance is predominant.

    • @nickhall5279
      @nickhall5279 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is just physics, you can’t expect a van to have car like consumption. Your low slung M3 will obviously consume less, in the same way my diesel car uses half as much diesel compared to my T5 van.

  • @BremboT
    @BremboT ปีที่แล้ว

    110km is a more realistic speed. Fast enough to get you where you need in a timely manner, fast enough to not peeve other motorists while you're in slow lane.

  • @timmurphy5541
    @timmurphy5541 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Vans often have large consumption when they are diesel or petrol so an EV Van...couldn't expect it to match a car. It should cost a lot less to operate than the average van.

    • @Scrap-press
      @Scrap-press ปีที่แล้ว

      You can get a decent Diesel Van for 20k whereas a decently specd Buzz costs 70k. If you're decision is solely based in cost you get the diesel /petrol van

    • @timmurphy5541
      @timmurphy5541 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Scrap-press I'm assuming that if you do A LOT of mileage then it might work out :-)

    • @Karow92
      @Karow92 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Scrap-press please show me a 20k new diesel van and I'll eat my hat

  • @ram64man
    @ram64man ปีที่แล้ว +1

    170 miles is just not enough for many especially in the american market, VW have to offer it with a bigger pack especially when they launch the longer wheel base version, there's just a few things that I really do not like about this, and i am thinking more along the lines of a mobility assist, the reduced wheel base makes it really awkward for lifts to be installed, it lacks high clearance as well as width from the doorway, boot space is quite frankly ill designed more aka to the commercial version,
    the step boot option is a terrible design able body individual will just be inconvenienced but from a wheel chair extremely challenging to load goods its just to high and makes you rely on others to load your chair. it doesn't fold up or drop down if not needed,

  • @kreidefelsen
    @kreidefelsen ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And this again: a range test with an empty Buzz. I´m still waiting for a more "realistic" test with even some load... Thanks anyway!

    • @BatteryLife
      @BatteryLife  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can ask that with every car. But how much weight?

    • @kreidefelsen
      @kreidefelsen ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BatteryLife Yes, you are right. But just the Buzz I would like to see with a few 100 kilo weight as a test. For some reason, no one does that on youtube. (at least I haven't seen anything about it so far).

    • @otternng
      @otternng ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@kreidefelsen th-cam.com/video/ChLSfpmnNZE/w-d-xo.html

    • @Astrophysikus
      @Astrophysikus ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@kreidefelsen It will hardly make a difference when going at more or less constant speed and on flat ground. Bjørn Nyland did a test with 400 kg in a Kia Soul and could not even measure any significant change in consumption. Of course, the story changes when you do a lot of stop-and-go driving in a city, let alone when you go up a significant elevation.

  • @clipsonplextorfield3230
    @clipsonplextorfield3230 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    simply unacceptable for a car that cost well over 75.000€

  • @zaneenaz4962
    @zaneenaz4962 ปีที่แล้ว

    The older vans have more room ------> th-cam.com/video/hLnzKmtb-8Q/w-d-xo.html

  • @andreiionescu205
    @andreiionescu205 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    German rocker