I think this is interesting but I just can't fully accept this model with the angles you show it from. I guess I just need to see it for myself. It would be nice if you can get it closer to scale and get a view from the inside the way we would see it.
Seems to me a fundamental problem would be that the observer will see different apparent suns. So the only way to validate your view would be to put the camera inside the model rather than look at it from the outside.
Thank you so much Lord for inspiring Joseph. All glory to God. Joseph do you realize you surpassed both Nicolas Copernicus's "Six Books On The Revolution Of The Heavenly" Or "De revolutionibus" (on which the false heliocentric model was based) and the Eise Eisinga Planetarium.
Hello Joseph. Great work. I am not a Taoist, but I am curious to know if your model shows what looks to be the yin-yang symbol? I believe the ancient Chinese knew more than we are lead to believe.
You are demonstrating how the outer limit of this plane can have 24 hrs sun while the Southern most area just North of where they went is experiencing the night time (dark).
Yes it does. And not only it does, the globe cannot have it. I will now show why "The globe earth completely done by this. And now the last straw: The globe earth, using a proper scaled model, cannot have a 24 hours Sun anywhere: th-cam.com/video/R96llz3K9As/w-d-xo.html The diagram is in 10:58 of the video. It is from a book written by flat earther Albert Smith in the 19th century. To be able to see a 24 hours Sun in the globe earth, the Sun would need to rise to position Q in the diagram, but since the globe earth model puts the Sun's Zenith in the Summer solstice in point F, that could take the role of either Capricorn or Cancer Tropic (since in the globe the observer is considered to be at the top of the globe), it is clear that the observer, that would be at point M, would have to look down and through the physical dimensions of the earth to actually see the Sun at midnight in both hemispheres, which is a complete impossibility".
Hey brother, can you help answer some of the questions people ask when they see footage of nasa or other footage of pictures from way up in the dark and see the curved eyes of those pictures. Is that due to the bowl around the edges or can it be given to the fish eye lenses being used. Thx brother love the work
sometimes a fish eye lens is used in satellites or extreme-altitude spacecraft in order to get a much better view of the outside. But then again, sometimes a fish-eye lens isn't used and it's just the curvature of the Earth that you see. You just have to ignore those ones and pretend they don't exist
@ thank you for your kindness, but the curvature math argument has been debunked years ago. You should just go look at the math brother or sister. That's not even an issue anymore. Many many experiments live that show no curvature. Including long range photography, and infrared photography. Curvature is way gone in the argument at this point
@@scottyfleming2203 Actually, the "Curvature Math Argument" hasn't been debunked years ago, hence why it's the completely accepted method and why it's used daily. Saying it is doesn't change that fact. It's likely (and even moreso likely due to the fact that you're watching this video) that you've been convinced by a handful of flat earthers that 8 inch/mile2 (which is presumably what you're talking about) doesn't work. If this were the case, 8 billion people would be up in arms, but there's no evidence suggesting this, only dodgy tiktok videos made by Flat Earthers trying to make a quick buck out of you. Regardless, Flat Earth hasn't actually been a thing for over 500 years, other in your small bubble of a few naive people who are still convinced Flat Earth is possible, which obviously it isn't. In regards to not being able to see curvature, my brother went on Virgin Galactic (the lucky bugger) so EVEN if the shape of the Earth took literal Sight to prove (which it doesn't, lol) I'm kind of immune to all of this anyway.
You can answer all the questions the globe can answer? Ok... why can't people in reality see the sun at night while the sun would never set in your model. Your model clearly shows that you can still easily see the sun's light from the dark parts. The things you claim you can answer better are the same points flat Earther come up with all the time. Misunderstanding basic physics aren't arguments, no matter how often you repeat them.
This model is totally ridiculous. Here's the real facts. Anyone can test this themselves. The circumference of the Earth at 8° North latitude is approximately 39,900 kilometers (or 24,800 miles) It is 12,400 miles from Phuket Thailand to the Republic of Panama Central America also located 8° North latitude At sunset in Phuket,,, At the exact same time sunrise is occurring in the Republic of Panama 12,400 miles. Using simple trigonometry for this to occur on a flat Earth The sun must have an altitude above the flat Earth of 54.09 miles Angle A 0.25° (Angle of the sun above the horizon at sunset) Angle B 90° Angle C 89.75° Side a 54.09 miles (Sun at 54.09 mi above its surface of the Flat Earth) Side b 12,396.52 miles Side c 12,396.64 miles Isn't math fun It never lies
That model is cool, hopefully one they you can sell it I would buy one, I was gonna try to make a model to show to my kids but to be honest I don't have the knowledge or the sufficient information to do it, thanks God you're working on that because with what is happening in Antarctica most flatearthers are loosing hope, not me I think when God convinces me of something no power in this world can make me change my mind,
@ not all of it. I don’t think it’s inspired. It has truth, but I don’t believe it’s inspired by God. I could be wrong, but that’s how I see Enoch currently. I have the book and it’s definitely interesting with real truth.
Lyndsay has been doing white board explanations for the past 5 or so years so his model is similar here Finally, A Flat Earth Model & Its Physics. Lindsay Harris 2024. th-cam.com/video/1AHGyD6P_Po/w-d-xo.html
The ridicule comes from the absolute fact that globe believers cannot duplicate their own model. You can’t disprove the creator, you can only deny. Excellent job bud!
Probably because you'd have to create a 1:1 size-accurate representation of Earth in order for mass to work correctly, which is totally unnecessary because you can break it down into verifiable chunks so easily. But since you brought it up, that's a good point. Not only does Flat Earth not even have a model, but it's never had a working model, and you guys can't even agree amongst yourselves about a model. Lol
It's interesting watching this develop. Very nice.
Interesting yes, anything like reality no. Please don't believe this, it's very silly.
@@Countryboy071 What makes it very silly?
You inspire me to set aside a room in the house to be a Flat Earth Firmamentarium.
Glory to the Creator. ☝🏼 🔭
Great Work!!
Work ? 😂
So nice 👍
Beautiful, thank you for sharing
Thanks for all you do!!!!!!
Thanks for your passion and hard work Joseph. God is good every day!
Joseph-you are killin’ it! Keep clocking those receipts! 😊
Dr Danny Faulkner needs to be honest and set up his own model to validate.
"Killin it" 😂 😂😂
Thanks for all you do!!❤
I think this is interesting but I just can't fully accept this model with the angles you show it from. I guess I just need to see it for myself.
It would be nice if you can get it closer to scale and get a view from the inside the way we would see it.
Amazing!
Can you explain the star Sirus and the flooding of the Nile do your stars move
Great work Joseph I appreciate all your hard work showing us how our geocentric model works.
Keep up the good work Brother 💪 🙏
It seems like the majority of antarctica is dark and the arctic is light. Is this supposed to be the setup for December or June?
keep going brother, genius at work.
Seems to me a fundamental problem would be that the observer will see different apparent suns. So the only way to validate your view would be to put the camera inside the model rather than look at it from the outside.
Thank you so much Lord for inspiring Joseph. All glory to God. Joseph do you realize you surpassed both Nicolas Copernicus's "Six Books On The Revolution Of The Heavenly" Or "De revolutionibus" (on which the false heliocentric model was based) and the Eise Eisinga Planetarium.
Are you turning into the biblical Nicholas Tesla?😅
@@whereisthegardenofeden9000 I just laughed out loud a little. Not sure about that, but thank you for the compliment.
Daniel 12:3 ❤
WOW you are so smart
Hello Joseph. Great work. I am not a Taoist, but I am curious to know if your model shows what looks to be the yin-yang symbol? I believe the ancient Chinese knew more than we are lead to believe.
You are demonstrating how the outer limit of this plane can have 24 hrs sun while the Southern most area just North of where they went is experiencing the night time (dark).
So that light source at antartica follows you as you change your observer location?
Does this setup also have the 24 hour Antarctic sun?
Yes it does. And not only it does, the globe cannot have it. I will now show why
"The globe earth completely done by this. And now the last straw: The globe earth, using a proper scaled model, cannot have a 24 hours Sun anywhere: th-cam.com/video/R96llz3K9As/w-d-xo.html
The diagram is in 10:58 of the video. It is from a book written by flat earther Albert Smith in the 19th century. To be able to see a 24 hours Sun in the globe earth, the Sun would need to rise to position Q in the diagram, but since the globe earth model puts the Sun's Zenith in the Summer solstice in point F, that could take the role of either Capricorn or Cancer Tropic (since in the globe the observer is considered to be at the top of the globe), it is clear that the observer, that would be at point M, would have to look down and through the physical dimensions of the earth to actually see the Sun at midnight in both hemispheres, which is a complete impossibility".
Raise the volume on your videos its very low thanks
Hey brother, can you help answer some of the questions people ask when they see footage of nasa or other footage of pictures from way up in the dark and see the curved eyes of those pictures. Is that due to the bowl around the edges or can it be given to the fish eye lenses being used. Thx brother love the work
sometimes a fish eye lens is used in satellites or extreme-altitude spacecraft in order to get a much better view of the outside. But then again, sometimes a fish-eye lens isn't used and it's just the curvature of the Earth that you see. You just have to ignore those ones and pretend they don't exist
@ thank you for your kindness, but the curvature math argument has been debunked years ago.
You should just go look at the math brother or sister.
That's not even an issue anymore. Many many experiments live that show no curvature.
Including long range photography, and infrared photography.
Curvature is way gone in the argument at this point
@@scottyfleming2203 Actually, the "Curvature Math Argument" hasn't been debunked years ago, hence why it's the completely accepted method and why it's used daily. Saying it is doesn't change that fact. It's likely (and even moreso likely due to the fact that you're watching this video) that you've been convinced by a handful of flat earthers that 8 inch/mile2 (which is presumably what you're talking about) doesn't work. If this were the case, 8 billion people would be up in arms, but there's no evidence suggesting this, only dodgy tiktok videos made by Flat Earthers trying to make a quick buck out of you.
Regardless, Flat Earth hasn't actually been a thing for over 500 years, other in your small bubble of a few naive people who are still convinced Flat Earth is possible, which obviously it isn't.
In regards to not being able to see curvature, my brother went on Virgin Galactic (the lucky bugger) so EVEN if the shape of the Earth took literal Sight to prove (which it doesn't, lol) I'm kind of immune to all of this anyway.
YHWH is so Great Glory be to YHWH!!! How can anyone think that our realm was not created??
Its all too dark. Cant reqlly see a lot.
You can answer all the questions the globe can answer? Ok... why can't people in reality see the sun at night while the sun would never set in your model. Your model clearly shows that you can still easily see the sun's light from the dark parts.
The things you claim you can answer better are the same points flat Earther come up with all the time. Misunderstanding basic physics aren't arguments, no matter how often you repeat them.
This model is totally ridiculous. Here's the real facts. Anyone can test this themselves.
The circumference of the Earth at 8° North latitude is approximately 39,900 kilometers (or 24,800 miles)
It is 12,400 miles from Phuket Thailand to the Republic of Panama Central America also located 8° North latitude
At sunset in Phuket,,, At the exact same time sunrise is occurring in the Republic of Panama 12,400 miles.
Using simple trigonometry for this to occur on a flat Earth The sun must have an altitude above the flat Earth of 54.09 miles
Angle A 0.25° (Angle of the sun above the horizon at sunset)
Angle B 90°
Angle C 89.75°
Side a 54.09 miles (Sun at 54.09 mi above its surface of the Flat Earth)
Side b 12,396.52 miles
Side c 12,396.64 miles
Isn't math fun It never lies
One question and is not a got you question is an honest one, when you say biblical model where in the Bible do you find that?
@@whereisthegardenofeden9000 all throughout. However the dome shaped mirror sky is in Job 38 specifically.
I thought you were going to say Enoch the book of the luminaries, have you read that book?
That model is cool, hopefully one they you can sell it I would buy one, I was gonna try to make a model to show to my kids but to be honest I don't have the knowledge or the sufficient information to do it, thanks God you're working on that because with what is happening in Antarctica most flatearthers are loosing hope, not me I think when God convinces me of something no power in this world can make me change my mind,
@ not all of it. I don’t think it’s inspired. It has truth, but I don’t believe it’s inspired by God. I could be wrong, but that’s how I see Enoch currently. I have the book and it’s definitely interesting with real truth.
@ yep His truth can’t be shaken in the heart of a true believer.
You should hang this over your bed to help you sleep. The Bible doesn't say the earth is flat, you guys are really spiraling.
Lyndsay has been doing white board explanations for the past 5 or so years so his model is similar here Finally, A Flat Earth Model & Its Physics. Lindsay Harris 2024. th-cam.com/video/1AHGyD6P_Po/w-d-xo.html
The ridicule comes from the absolute fact that globe believers cannot duplicate their own model. You can’t disprove the creator, you can only deny. Excellent job bud!
Probably because you'd have to create a 1:1 size-accurate representation of Earth in order for mass to work correctly, which is totally unnecessary because you can break it down into verifiable chunks so easily. But since you brought it up, that's a good point. Not only does Flat Earth not even have a model, but it's never had a working model, and you guys can't even agree amongst yourselves about a model. Lol