I think code requires a 2nd cutoff in certain states for boilers above a certain btu rating. That's a big boiler. I had 550,000 WM EG-11 in my house. Was able to replace it with an 8 section Burnham Independence.
Very true. These two basically shut down the same thing tho. The one I replaced cut main power to the boiler, the other cut power to the ignition control board.
They always put 2 of the same safety on Comercial boilers
Code over 300000 btu requar two low water cuts of one manually push to one ,if cut off
I think code requires a 2nd cutoff in certain states for boilers above a certain btu rating. That's a big boiler. I had 550,000 WM EG-11 in my house. Was able to replace it with an 8 section Burnham Independence.
Didn’t think about that. Good point
@JeffsHVACAdventures Somebody might have been thinking about redundant protection. Better to have 2 than none !
Sometimes you could have 2 LECO's , one being used as the actual burner shutdown and the second one controls the make-up wster valve.
Very true. These two basically shut down the same thing tho. The one I replaced cut main power to the boiler, the other cut power to the ignition control board.
maybe a odd safety feature, one for each burner but wired diffrently
Could be..
In case someone says Double hog dare ya…
Better have 2 guard dogs 😂😂😂
Same reason it has 2 valves pads the bill
The size of the boiler is why I believe
Redundancy is the reason I think