Low Water Cut-Off Replacement On Weil-Mclane Boiler. But Why Two?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @desieranks
    @desieranks หลายเดือนก่อน

    They always put 2 of the same safety on Comercial boilers

  • @nayemhossain4283
    @nayemhossain4283 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Code over 300000 btu requar two low water cuts of one manually push to one ,if cut off

  • @Bob.W.
    @Bob.W. ปีที่แล้ว

    I think code requires a 2nd cutoff in certain states for boilers above a certain btu rating. That's a big boiler. I had 550,000 WM EG-11 in my house. Was able to replace it with an 8 section Burnham Independence.

    • @JeffsHVACAdventures
      @JeffsHVACAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      Didn’t think about that. Good point

    • @georgebrabec1749
      @georgebrabec1749 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@JeffsHVACAdventures Somebody might have been thinking about redundant protection. Better to have 2 than none !

  • @georgebrabec1749
    @georgebrabec1749 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sometimes you could have 2 LECO's , one being used as the actual burner shutdown and the second one controls the make-up wster valve.

    • @JeffsHVACAdventures
      @JeffsHVACAdventures  ปีที่แล้ว

      Very true. These two basically shut down the same thing tho. The one I replaced cut main power to the boiler, the other cut power to the ignition control board.

  • @databasespace
    @databasespace ปีที่แล้ว

    maybe a odd safety feature, one for each burner but wired diffrently

  • @jeffreyhalet9632
    @jeffreyhalet9632 ปีที่แล้ว

    In case someone says Double hog dare ya…
    Better have 2 guard dogs 😂😂😂

  • @mikewhittaker5984
    @mikewhittaker5984 ปีที่แล้ว

    Same reason it has 2 valves pads the bill

  • @zlo92x21
    @zlo92x21 ปีที่แล้ว

    The size of the boiler is why I believe

  • @Irilia_neko
    @Irilia_neko ปีที่แล้ว

    Redundancy is the reason I think