Thank you for the helpful video. By the way, I wonder at 4:34, isn't his behavior has high distinctiveness? John says hello to others but he just behave in different way to you.
Hello! That's correct. His behaviour has high distinctiveness, but low consistency (he was alright with other people). But this was perhaps not deliberate. Perhaps John would come round later and say hello to you. And when this happens, you'll correct yourself and attribute external factors again. 🙂🙂
@@MisterSimplify Sorry, I wonder that so John's behavior has low consensus, high distinctiveness (the PPT have mistake?) and low consistency, at that time will I still attribute John's behavior to internal factors just like PPT shows? and if John didn't come round later and say hello to you, will I still attribute internal factors?
@@MisterSimplifyyes, I replied based on that, maybe because it is in English so I can't fully understand. I mean, so, the final answer that the attribution is internal or external is judge from majority rule? because two of the three dimensions are "low"? sorry for bother you so much, your vedio is very excellent, I just confuse for this part.
Hello buddy! A tutorial on Perception psychology has been added as per your request. Please check it out, and let me know your thoughts in its comment section. 😊 th-cam.com/video/pgtbZhAf5Bo/w-d-xo.html
Hi Jisha. That's a good recommendation. I've added this to the pipeline for you. It might take some time, but I will cover it for sure. Please watch out for it!
Hi Apoorva. Kelly's covariation theory is a variation of Attribution and uses the concepts that constitute the attribution theory. It's therefore considered as a deeper dive into attribution theory.
Interesting! I believe "social engineering" includes pre-programming social attributions, based on some sort of purported compensation.
Hello Rob! Thank you for your super thanks! Yes social engineering will include pre-programmed attribution.
For business students: This is Perceiver, Target, and situation.
thanks for this! it brought me knowledge to digest the inner meaning of this theory. God bless and take care.
Bom dia são José dos pinhais
Thankyou for this! ❤
Very nice explanation
😊👍
I looooveee youuuu you’re saving me right now!
Really glad to help! Hope you also check out some other tutorials here! 🤗☺
Thank you for this informative video.
You're most welcome! 😊
Well explained, really helpful
Excellent explanation, that was very helpful to me. Thank you so much.
You're most welcome! Please like and share the content in this channel! ☺
Thankyou for this simplified way of explaining Attribution theory.
You're most welcome! Please share this video to express support! 😊
Very well explained
Thank you for the helpful video. By the way, I wonder at 4:34, isn't his behavior has high distinctiveness? John says hello to others but he just behave in different way to you.
Hello! That's correct. His behaviour has high distinctiveness, but low consistency (he was alright with other people). But this was perhaps not deliberate. Perhaps John would come round later and say hello to you. And when this happens, you'll correct yourself and attribute external factors again. 🙂🙂
I came to make this query. Thank you!
@@MisterSimplify Sorry, I wonder that so John's behavior has low consensus, high distinctiveness (the PPT have mistake?) and low consistency, at that time will I still attribute John's behavior to internal factors just like PPT shows?
and if John didn't come round later and say hello to you, will I still attribute internal factors?
@@明同學 Hello. Please check my response to the original comment 🙂
@@MisterSimplifyyes, I replied based on that, maybe because it is in English so I can't fully understand. I mean, so, the final answer that the attribution is internal or external is judge from majority rule? because two of the three dimensions are "low"? sorry for bother you so much, your vedio is very excellent, I just confuse for this part.
Clear explanation 😊
Thank you so much for this!
You're most welcome! Please keep supporting! 😊
Your explanation were really clear.... I love it.
Thanks for your comment Toheeb! Hope you share it with friends and peers! 🙂
Plz...make videos on perception
I'll add this to the pipeline for you! 👍👍
Hello buddy! A tutorial on Perception psychology has been added as per your request. Please check it out, and let me know your thoughts in its comment section. 😊
th-cam.com/video/pgtbZhAf5Bo/w-d-xo.html
Thank you..
You are most welcome! :)
Love the way you explain 🥰, thanks for this 🤗
Nice explanation ❤️
Great work❤
Joeldeoliveira
Thank you. Could you please teach Heider's Balance theory with relevant examples?
Hi Jisha. That's a good recommendation. I've added this to the pipeline for you. It might take some time, but I will cover it for sure. Please watch out for it!
Thanks 😊 u are the best 🙏🥰
You're most welcome . . . and you're certainly also no less than the best! Take care! 🙂👍
Well explained
thank you this really helped
You are most welcome! Please keep supporting! :)
Is fundamental attribution theory and biases are part of Kelley's covariation theory?
Hi Apoorva. Kelly's covariation theory is a variation of Attribution and uses the concepts that constitute the attribution theory. It's therefore considered as a deeper dive into attribution theory.
Thank u
what is the major attributes transmitted amoung the youth through social media?
Thankyouu for this video.
I have a question isn't the fundamental attribution error just the same as the actor-observer Bias?
Hello! In actor-observer bias we also attribute our our actions to internal causes, which makes it different to fundamental attribution.
U Sound like kumara Sangakkara
Haha! The cricketer! Well, I suppose others will know better than me. It's always difficult to equate one's own appearance or voice to someone else. 🙂
Legit the best explanation ever ❤️ THANK YOU 🙏🏻🫶🏻
You're most welcome! ☺
Very good explanation