Who Wrote the Bible? The Documentary Hypothesis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @assyriannahrin
    @assyriannahrin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I really really like this. I've watched alot of videos about documentary hypothesis,but unlike this one. You go through everything giving examples of and pointing to the difference in the verses. Much like and subed

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      When you are a Godless and a Souless idiot that thinks she will be nothing you get attached by those godless theory...

    • @WhiteDove73-888
      @WhiteDove73-888 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You like this but it’s 100 false. 😂😅

    • @thechazz3230
      @thechazz3230 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WhiteDove73-888 no no it's not. Stop larping

    • @kenwarden1864
      @kenwarden1864 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      False, false, unbelievable, unreal.... go on?

  • @joecaner
    @joecaner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    It is refreshing to hear a self-identifying Christian delivering a cogent lecture on the origins of scripture instead of engaging in dubious logical apologetics in an attempt to justify their belief in Biblical inerrancy.

    • @Arthurian_Rabbit
      @Arthurian_Rabbit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Tell me about it, as sumbunny who was raised in the southern United States I almost experienced shock induced head-explodey after discovering this channel.
      Even the "nicest" Christians out there practiced shunning techniques on me. No need to mention what the regulars did, most of us already know that experience.
      If more Christians behaved like this there sure would be a lot less angry, resentful atheists in the world.

    • @balsarmy
      @balsarmy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well why not? Books are books. I think someone can consider themselves as religious not because he is dogmatic, but because some elements of religion are appealing for him

    • @Arthurian_Rabbit
      @Arthurian_Rabbit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@balsarmy Because a vast majority of Christians in the southern United States are loud, oppressive and obnoxious?
      If you've not lost your job because of, or been harassed by evangelicals or fundamentalists, then lucky you.
      Believing in the literalism of the Christian religion tends to lead towards toxic behavior.
      Scholarly folk who happen to like the Abrahamic faiths and enjoy/recognize the allegories in them are not common.

    • @yohei72
      @yohei72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Arthurian_Rabbit "Scholarly folk who happen to like the Abrahamic faiths and enjoy/recognize the allegories in them are not common."
      This isn't true at all, in my observation. I think people like this are pretty common, but the shrieking fundamentalists just make a lot more noise, by their nature.

    • @Dethfeast
      @Dethfeast ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes, those of us who grew up in the "land of Biblical Inerrancy" (The American South) grew up with a lot of nonsense that the scholarly interpretation doesn't need. Trying to say the Bible is inerrant, but then watching someone dance around the many, many inconsistencies and contradictions was always fairly ridiculous.

  • @kristJ25
    @kristJ25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I like watching this guy because its peaceful.

  • @stone18jo
    @stone18jo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Im an atheist but enjoy your lectures. Very well structured. Thank you

    • @thoughtful1233
      @thoughtful1233 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why the "but"? I'm an atheist and until I heard him say otherwise I assumed John Hamer was too.

  • @latetotheparty4785
    @latetotheparty4785 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    But clean/unclean is Mosaic Law, hundreds if not thousands of years after Noah.

  • @rupertkempley2933
    @rupertkempley2933 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Assumed this was Harvard or somewhere like it, great stuff, bright kids in audience, v grateful for this quality whilst I work

  • @mikekaatman3194
    @mikekaatman3194 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Some guys who figured out early that most people are sheep...and can be taking advantage off...those wrote the bible.

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That would be denying any oral tradition preceiding scripture. Got a logical argument for that or are you merely expressing your tenets of faith?

    • @dabouras
      @dabouras 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There are other written sources on clay tablets.

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dabouras I'm aware of that, thank you. I just don't see how it strengthens or diminishes my point.

    • @Joh2n
      @Joh2n 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Did you mean that the apostles wrote the Bible to take advantage of people? LO------' Most of them died a horrible martyrs death to bring the truth to us.

    • @brahmburgers
      @brahmburgers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Bible is chock full with Metaphysics. New e-book scrutinizes the New Testament. Its title: 'Candy Coated Jesus.'

  • @NecroLiquor.
    @NecroLiquor. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    As a theological student and having an eclectic study history, this is a truly great lecture. Good visuals, superb presence and remarkable approach.
    Thank you for the upload! (A few years after…)

    • @donominame8859
      @donominame8859 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check out The Cosmic Skeptic. If you haven't already....

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You must be failing in school. If you think this guy is telling you the truth your brutish. Stop being so lazy.

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      @@donominame8859 And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      @@donominame8859 ye another Godless and Souless westenr idiot that thinks God cares what he think to exist... 😂😂😂

  • @mrlume9475
    @mrlume9475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Very good lecture, interesting from start to finish.

  • @mercelloveras7453
    @mercelloveras7453 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks a lot for these lectures which make more clear the difficult reading of Ancient Testament.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Love thy neighbough" first appears in Leviticus 19:18
    The next time it appears is in Matthew 5:43...
    "Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbough and hate thine enemy..."
    Jesus is recalling the earlier commandment(s) before making up a new one !

    • @kathyh.648
      @kathyh.648 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually hate is condemned long before Moses: when Cain wroth against Able and than hated him, as in the context of Deut 19:11 explained….
      God condemned even being wroth. So this was no new commandment Jesus gave, and he said it too.
      Mat 22:37-40 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kathyh.648
      I don't always agree with Jesus.
      For example in Luke 14:13 he said ...
      "When thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind and the deaf".
      At the last supper, he only called his disciples, so I think we can ignore his earlier suggestion.

    • @martinezkai4028
      @martinezkai4028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes.

  • @undercoverbrother67
    @undercoverbrother67 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like your style. Subbed.

  • @juvegirlbe
    @juvegirlbe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Really great lecture!

    • @centre-place
      @centre-place  5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thank you, and good to hear from you!

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If your a moron. This speaker is and idiot. He makes it up as he goes along. He audience is unlearned so he can say anything and they will believe him. I would be more than happy to have a discussion with this pahrisse, It won't take me long to show that he doesn't know what he is talking about.

    • @BillyMeierInFrenchBM
      @BillyMeierInFrenchBM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@centre-place You should have a look at the work of James Deardorff about the Talmud of Jmmanuel.

    • @AnyProofOfTheseClaims
      @AnyProofOfTheseClaims 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HOWBAZARY You would get intellectually dog walked.

    • @SteveSmith-kd9if
      @SteveSmith-kd9if 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@centre-placeTHERE'S NO WAY OUT OF THAT SATAN SYSTEM FOR YOU, OR ANYBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T MAKE ANY LONG TERM PLANS BECAUSE THE WHOLE EARTH WILL BE GETTING DESTROYED REAL SOON, AND EVERYONE WILL BE GETTING SENT STRAIGHT TO HELL, "WHERE YOU'LL ZOMBIES BELONG"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @EscepticoHumanistaUU
    @EscepticoHumanistaUU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent exposition of the Documentary Hypothesis 👏

  • @aaacool0873
    @aaacool0873 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Outstanding your a great explainer to us common minds I love learning from you

  • @Kristy_not_Kristine
    @Kristy_not_Kristine ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting! Thanks for sharing these ideas. I've been studying the messy history of the mormons, especially since the time of Brigham Young and all the changes he made to Joseph smith's journals and revelations. It's so messy! It's interesting to see how messy Biblical history is, too.

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, all religious history tends to be messy

  • @Blind_Side94
    @Blind_Side94 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have only just discovered this channel these lectures are brilliantand so wide casting I have just finished the one encompassing the 'not so holy, not so roman, not so empire' I am addicted.

    • @VSP4591
      @VSP4591 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are not alone. Me too I discovered this excelent channel and I appreciate it enormously.

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VSP4591 And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      When you think you are a Godelss idiot you been attached to this Godless idiot channel

    • @VSP4591
      @VSP4591 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mar-dk3mp Of course!!!

  • @Emcee_Squared
    @Emcee_Squared 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This topic has always fascinated me but I’m afraid it will never be anything more than just a hypothesis unless we are able to find some other ancient biblical texts that predate the Qumran scrolls. I recently read an article on NYTimes regarding an old story about an archaeologist who discovered an ancient version of Deuteronomy (possibly dating to the 1st temple period). It was declared a forgery and the discoverer later committed suicide. However, now there are scholars saying it may not have been a forgery but it is long lost. This was about 100 years ago.

    • @brahmburgers
      @brahmburgers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Try researching the Gospel of Judas. It's authenticated by The Pope and the Vatican. It shows Jesus deeply mired in metaphysics and his favorite disciple was his youngest: Judas. Additional details in the new e-book: 'Candy Coated Jesus.'

    • @oliverford5367
      @oliverford5367 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No way texts that old will have survived. So it will remain a theory, as will any other scholarly views of the Bible. We'll never be able to prove it

    • @Emcee_Squared
      @Emcee_Squared 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oliverford5367 Yes it is possible as was the case for the ancient papyrus text from Egypt known as “the story of wenamun” dated to 1000 BCE, predating the Qumran scrolls by about 900 years. And many of the biblical texts are said to have been written between the time of these two texts so it is possible that something may be discovered through future excavations.

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't believe in the Textus Receptus but you believe the New York Times. Get outta here.

    • @Emcee_Squared
      @Emcee_Squared 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HOWBAZARY not a fan of NYTimes but they were the only ones with that story: “Is a Long-Dismissed Forgery Actually the Oldest Known Biblical Manuscript? - The New York Times”

  • @bell1095
    @bell1095 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Dont cook the goat (to complete by) "AS LONG AS IT IS DEPENDEND ON" milk from its mother. Means don't cause heartbreak to its mother, by taking her child from her. This is the empathic moral lesson of the text, as of the verbal content. The "kosher" philosophy is neither evident nor functional in context.

    • @annepoitrineau5650
      @annepoitrineau5650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or: do not eat a goat before it has had time to reproduce. This is the essence of conservation and is used in fishing (fishing permits prescribe a certain size) and behind the rules of culling animals. A good rule.

  • @buymybooks437
    @buymybooks437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm addicted to this channel

  • @MM-jf1me
    @MM-jf1me 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Greatly enjoyed this lecture!

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course you are a Godless and Souless idiot

    • @alwilliams5177
      @alwilliams5177 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I appreciate John's intellectual rigor and humor. His lectures are quite a blessing.

  • @matheusdabnei5540
    @matheusdabnei5540 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great lecture! Can anybody tell the name of the lecturer? I begg hehe

  • @WhiteDove73-888
    @WhiteDove73-888 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Gnostic texts weren’t lost they were literally thrown away.

  • @MegaJohn144
    @MegaJohn144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I am impressed by the questions coming out of the audience.

  • @timandmonica
    @timandmonica หลายเดือนก่อน

    Question for the presenter: have you noticed that Leviticus also contains a list of commandments that claim they were given to Moses from God at Mt. Sinai for the Israelites?
    Leviticus 27
    In verse 34 below, it refers to this whole section by stating: “These are the commands the Lord gave Moses at Mount Sinai for the Israelites.”
    1 The Lord said to Moses,
    2 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If anyone makes a special vow to dedicate a person to the Lord by giving the equivalent value,
    3 set the value of a male between the ages of twenty and sixty at fifty shekels of silver, according to the sanctuary shekel
    4 for a female, set her value at thirty shekels
    5 for a person between the ages of five and twenty, set the value of a male at twenty shekels and of a female at ten shekels
    6 for a person between one month and five years, set the value of a male at five shekels of silver and that of a female at three shekels of silver;
    7 for a person sixty years old or more, set the value of a male at fifteen shekels and of a female at ten shekels.
    8 If anyone making the vow is too poor to pay the specified amount, the person being dedicated is to be presented to the priest, who will set the value according to what the one making the vow can afford.
    9 “‘If what they vowed is an animal that is acceptable as an offering to the Lord, such an animal given to the Lord becomes holy.
    10 They must not exchange it or substitute a good one for a bad one, or a bad one for a good one; if they should substitute one animal for another, both it and the substitute become holy.
    11 If what they vowed is a ceremonially unclean animal-one that is not acceptable as an offering to the Lord-the animal must be presented to the priest,
    12 who will judge its quality as good or bad. Whatever value the priest then sets, that is what it will be.
    13 If the owner wishes to redeem the animal, a fifth must be added to its value.
    14 “‘If anyone dedicates their house as something holy to the Lord, the priest will judge its quality as good or bad. Whatever value the priest then sets, so it will remain.
    15 If the one who dedicates their house wishes to redeem it, they must add a fifth to its value, and the house will again become theirs.
    16 “‘If anyone dedicates to the Lord part of their family land, its value is to be set according to the amount of seed required for it-fifty shekels of silver to a homer of barley seed.
    17 If they dedicate a field during the Year of Jubilee, the value that has been set remains.
    18 But if they dedicate a field after the Jubilee, the priest will determine the value according to the number of years that remain until the next Year of Jubilee, and its set value will be reduced.
    19 If the one who dedicates the field wishes to redeem it, they must add a fifth to its value, and the field will again become theirs.
    20 If, however, they do not redeem the field, or if they have sold it to someone else, it can never be redeemed.
    21 When the field is released in the Jubilee, it will become holy, like a field devoted to the Lord; it will become priestly property.
    22 “‘If anyone dedicates to the Lord a field they have bought, which is not part of their family land,
    23 the priest will determine its value up to the Year of Jubilee, and the owner must pay its value on that day as something holy to the Lord.
    24 In the Year of Jubilee the field will revert to the person from whom it was bought, the one whose land it was.
    25 Every value is to be set according to the sanctuary shekel, twenty gerahs to the shekel.
    26 “‘No one, however, may dedicate the firstborn of an animal, since the firstborn already belongs to the Lord; whether an ox or a sheep, it is the Lord’s.
    27 If it is one of the unclean animals, it may be bought back at its set value, adding a fifth of the value to it. If it is not redeemed, it is to be sold at its set value.
    28 “‘But nothing that a person owns and devotes to the Lord-whether a human being or an animal or family land-may be sold or redeemed; everything so devoted is most holy to the Lord.
    29 “‘No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed; they are to be put to death.
    30 “‘A tithe of everything from the land, whether grain from the soil or fruit from the trees, belongs to the Lord; it is holy to the Lord.
    31 Whoever would redeem any of their tithe must add a fifth of the value to it.
    32 Every tithe of the herd and flock-every tenth animal that passes under the shepherd’s rod-will be holy to the Lord.
    33 No one may pick out the good from the bad or make any substitution. If anyone does make a substitution, both the animal and its substitute become holy and cannot be redeemed.’”
    34 These are the commands the Lord gave Moses at Mount Sinai for the Israelites.

  • @dca4840
    @dca4840 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Food for thought. Why didn't the almighty just go ahead and create more animals instead of making Noah go thru that?

  • @steveb2662
    @steveb2662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very good presentation. I believe the Redactor is Ptolemy Philadelphus. I also believe that, of the representatives that went to Egypt, the Judahites greatly outnumbered the Samaritans (formerly the Israelites) and that's why the J, P and D versions lean in their favor. This is also the reason for the split between them.

    • @VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz
      @VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How could the Greek Translators in Alexandria have redacted the Hebrew Text that was in the Temple?

    • @steveb2662
      @steveb2662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz what hebrew text in the temple? There is no text that predates the Septuigint.

    • @VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz
      @VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@steveb2662 What evidence is there to say that the Septuagint cam first?

    • @steveb2662
      @steveb2662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz the Torah was translated in the early to mid 3rd century BCE. This is the septuagint. There are no biblical texts in existence that are older than than the mid 3rd century.
      The evidence for this is twofold;
      1. The early Greek language, contemporary citations and datable manuscripts.
      2. The earliest dating of oldest biblical texts is mid 2nd century. Long after the time of the septuagint.
      Keep in mind, I didn't say the septuagint is the original source for the stories in the bible. Just that they, the translators were the redactors, and I believe first compilers, of what is the present day Torah.

    • @VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz
      @VincenzoRutiglianoDiaz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@steveb2662 I dont get it, just because the manuscripts are not available it does not mean that at it could not have been compiled at the time of Ezra. What Book did Ezra have in the 500s then?

  • @TheJonnyzeus
    @TheJonnyzeus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you. A dispassionate, logical, Socratic approach.

  • @shadowenighthawke2023
    @shadowenighthawke2023 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well Done

  • @economicist2011
    @economicist2011 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great summary. I looked this up after watching a video about how writers who invoke the Bible like to mix and match verses to suit their storyline. This video served as an excellent background to how such different messages became available to choose.

  • @AdrianneMilam-qk7ze
    @AdrianneMilam-qk7ze ปีที่แล้ว

    Closed caption misses a lot

  • @sta8807
    @sta8807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A good solid study of duplets and old testament creation. Loved it.

  • @luigigarciasaavedra655
    @luigigarciasaavedra655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But even if the Literalist do not accept Scholarship, they can see the differing versions of same passages. How has that been explained by them?

    • @donatist59
      @donatist59 ปีที่แล้ว

      I ask them to tell me exactly what words Pilate had written on the Cross, since the words read differently in all four gospels. I have yet to get a straight answer.

  • @sentryogmixmaster
    @sentryogmixmaster 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    ez...Stephen King, he writes everything

    • @herrcooles900
      @herrcooles900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gilgamesch epic. 100 % stephen king 😂😅🤣

    • @DrStfuFool
      @DrStfuFool 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In collaboration with Tom Clancy and John Grisham.

    • @katherenewedic8076
      @katherenewedic8076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂

  • @jessereichbach588
    @jessereichbach588 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    About the pronunciation of the sacred, divine name, YhVh. The Rabbis passed down a tradition from one generation to the next to remember the pronunciation. So it was never actually lost.
    What happened is that at some point they decided it was taboo to say the word out loud. This word was generally only supposed to be spoken on Yom Kipur, by the high priest in the holy of holies.
    So after the temple fell, with the belief that eventually messiah will come and the temple will be rebuilt, they continued to pass down the pronunciation, only within certain Rabbinical schools and only to those of a certain status and education let's say.
    We have a letter from a Rabbi Mayer of Lublin. In the letter he states plainly that the mnemonic to remember the vowels are "le holam". Which if you understand hebrew you would understand the meaning of that if you had to decipher it. The vowels basically. And he stated plainly they are sheva, cholam and kamatz.
    They kept this a secret and denied this because Christians were running around using the name out loud. And telling other people it was ok to say it out loud. In the Rabbinical belief, they considered this dangerous. Not only dangerous but one of the worst "sins" one can make.
    They believe saying the word takes you out of yourself and into "eternity", which they claim is dangerous and something you aren't supposed to experience til death or some mumbo jumbo along those lines. We have to remember how much word magic exists in the Hebrew tradition. From golem spells, to sacred names. The Khabbalists got very into this even, and in Kabbalah there is the 42 letter sacred name and all that.
    Anyway, the pronunciation was passed down. And the vowels are indeed E, O and A. Which is "Yehovah" or "Yehowah". Now, "holam" which is a vowel sign in the Hebrew context, used to be pronounced and spelled "holem". So I'm not sure if the actual pronunciation would agree more with the old or new. But if this is the case, then the early pronunciation might have very well been "Yehoweh" or "Yehoveh" or in a lazier pronunciation, Yahweh. or Yaveh.
    But as far as the Rabbis of the early modern period and later were concerned, it would have been "Yehowah" or "Yehovah".

  • @stevensprunger3422
    @stevensprunger3422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    OK but Noah would’ have only had to bring one amoeba because they reproduce asexually

    • @johnsmith-ir1ne
      @johnsmith-ir1ne 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I love that you've thought about that.

  • @sanjanewmoonlife
    @sanjanewmoonlife 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobody following these rules. Life is full of sinners. You are not innocent, you are also a sinner.

    • @curbroadshow
      @curbroadshow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What rules? It’s all a mess of contradictions.

  • @robertdemartino2572
    @robertdemartino2572 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Greek mystics wrote the Bible. It seems that this guy reads the Bible like a book as do most Christians.

    • @iuiu8831
      @iuiu8831 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Greek didn't exist when BIBLE was written. Same as latin. Can you explain the origin of John's name? ? Or Peter or Paul or Matthew? ?????

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your both wrong.

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Old Testament was written in Hebrew. The New Testament was written in Greek. Thank you God for calling me out of this world. People are dumb and lazy.

    • @annepoitrineau5650
      @annepoitrineau5650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HOWBAZARY Do not judge lest you shall be judged, or some such. People are not dumb. It is a wild maze of stuff out there and people have not had the chance to inform themselves, but the very fact they are on this channel means they are striving to be educated and learn and understand!!

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Were the sacrifices of the first borns eaten? And if so, were exceptions made for human first borns? Would love to hear a talk sometime on how exactly the sacrificial system worked in Israel and the surrounding Nations, including how it worked and changed over time.

  • @MeTaLAnGeL
    @MeTaLAnGeL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    GREAT, glad I found this channel, so many questions I have answered :)

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      And that Becuase you western Godless and Souless robot corrupted by a wealthy Society now you say it??? Is it that a new theory front you Western and Godless idiot because you do not know what to do with science once you are death ☠️???... Poor Freaking robot 🤖 without soul 😂😂. From nothing they come nothing they will be, very nice thinking you western godless and Souless idiot.. 😂😂 Jesus called viper and knew that you will be betrayed him, that why he said he comes to bring a sword ⚔️ and not peace, which means there will be people who will believe him and not who will not, so why you western Godless Idiot let him be right? 😊See godless and Souless idiots talking about a God that they do not have, it is like to someone who spend a lot of time stading aliens or saints claus in which he does not believe. 🤣🤣🤣
      Godless and Souless western idiot are so obsessed with those videos because they do not have soul or god...
      Westerns godless and Souless idiot are the only arrogante people that want explain to others their own religion and God... Because they do not have god... They are freaking Souless robot 🤖 🤣🤣🤣
      But you are just a viper 🐍 as Jesus said, and he was right and what Viper do, expecting biting???
      I guess godless and Souless idiot they need other to explain other people religion because they do not have God or a soul, right???

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp ปีที่แล้ว

      Godless and Souless idiot tell you about God? I guess I need to go to the Hospital to let me teach Astrology. Godless idiot

  • @PaulTheSkeptic
    @PaulTheSkeptic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I didn't expect many many hours of lectures. Could anyone, I dunno, sum it up for me? From what I understand, when you go back far enough, the Hebrew culture, language and religion merges with the Canaanite culture, language and religion. And it's suspected that Yahweh was originally part of the Canaanite pantheon of gods. Is that close enough?

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually, El was the chief god in the Canaanite pantheon. YHWH, May have been imported from Moab.

    • @PaulTheSkeptic
      @PaulTheSkeptic ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelhenry1763 The "Actually" threw me off a bit. It seemed at first like you were correcting me. But I agree. To my knowledge, that's correct. El was their Zeus. I didn't know Yahweh was imported but he was the war god wasn't he? He was their equivalent to Aries. So what part was imported?

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PaulTheSkeptic yes, thank you , I am not trying to correct you. The origins of YHWH are a little complicated. You are right, he was part of the Canaanite pantheon, he did absorb the roles of El and Baal. It seems he was originally a war god from the “‘south”. Then grafted into the Canaanite pantheon.

    • @PaulTheSkeptic
      @PaulTheSkeptic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelhenry1763 I should say, that's my understanding. I'm not any kind of expert. Sometimes even well researched stuff can go a little wrong if you don't have a background in the subject. Mostly I'm just making conversation.

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PaulTheSkeptic I agree with you. It is fun having these sorts of conversations.

  • @waltseng1014
    @waltseng1014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a problem with the number of animals garnered if Noah (?) rounded up all. The number of species extant is about 7 million. Boggles my mind. Must be a myth. The ark would be about the size of Texas.

    • @waltseng1014
      @waltseng1014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Food? Excrement management.

    • @waltseng1014
      @waltseng1014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      7 million x 2 = 14 million creatures. Nonsense.

    • @waltseng1014
      @waltseng1014 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      At least you appear to have a sense of humor

    • @Buddah001
      @Buddah001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Consider each kind of animal may be much less. One kind of dog then, a wolf. And so on.

    • @mslice0760
      @mslice0760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@waltseng1014 If the animals were extinct, then they were not on the ark,.....any animal species that came after the flood came from the original kind (genettic switches )that was on the ark........also the animals could have been put in a state of hibernation, thus solving the feeding and waste problems.

  • @Jaggerbush
    @Jaggerbush 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He needs to consider starting a Rush cover band.

  • @78Dipar
    @78Dipar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's well known now the the Bible started to be written at the order of Josiah, king of Judah, in the 7th century before JC. He had created monotheism by forbidding any other cult than the one of Yahve (who before that was one god among others), and needed a glorious (but invented) past.
    There has never benn hebrew slaves in Egypt, no escape, no crossing of the desert during 40 years, no conquest of Canaan, no great kindom with David and Solomon...

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When does a book start to be written? when the author has the first idea for that book, or when the author puts the first letter on paper? What if parts of the newly written book are copied from older books? Does then the newly written book start when the first letter of the part that was copied was put on paper (or before) in the book it copied from?

    • @78Dipar
      @78Dipar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BlacksmithTWD
      The bible started to be written at the order of King Josiah, and was far from being finished when Josiah was killed by egyptians, but his scribes contined the work, including when deported in Babylon.
      The bible isn't 100% imaginary, mentionned places exist, so do some of the characters, for example David existed, but was a small tribe chief, not a great king...

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@78Dipar
      Obviously it wasn't finished When King Josia died, the whole new testament still needed to be written at that moment.
      Merely repeating your claim doesn't answer the question I posed. Do you intend to keep talking passed each other or are you going to make a genuine attempt at answering it?
      Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my formulation of my question, if needed I can elaborate on it.

    • @78Dipar
      @78Dipar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BlacksmithTWD
      Its about the old testament, not the new one !
      As I wrote the old tesmament wasn't finished to be written when king Josiah was killed.
      The new testament is something else, and was written long after !

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@78Dipar
      No, you specifically stated 'the bible', and the bible includes both the old and the new testament. Though if you had stated 'the old testament' instead , I would have agreed with you as well. There is no fundamental disagreement between us as far as I can see.

  • @coryc8819
    @coryc8819 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How did the carnivorous animals survive

    • @mslice0760
      @mslice0760 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      when zoo's run out of money, they feed lions and Tigers straw, for months.

  • @dongorth9102
    @dongorth9102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bronze age goat hearders made a lot of the fairytales up..The rest were passed down from older religions..

    • @yohei72
      @yohei72 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, but why the classist snearing about "goat herders"? It's a perfectly respectable occupation, and a lot more useful than being a king or a priest.

    • @dongorth9102
      @dongorth9102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yohei72 Didnt say it was a bad job..That's just what they were.Could have said they were Carpenters but they were in a desert..

    • @IamRobinBanks
      @IamRobinBanks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They just kept inventing more ideas just in case they ran across atheists that would ask them questions they couldn't answer. Faith was a good one

  • @johnrogers7772
    @johnrogers7772 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Deuteronomist is presumed to be a Levite priest from the Mosiac 'camp' at Shiloh. Solomon selected an Aaronite Levite High Priest for the first temple, and as a result, the Mosiac Levite priests 'lost' the power battle. The Aaronites controlled Temple worship until the destruction of the second temple in 70CE. The tension between D and P is a best understood from this perspective.

  • @katfishkobain8809
    @katfishkobain8809 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Adam and Eve were the first couple not to read the fine print on the Apple 🍎

    • @drmontague6475
      @drmontague6475 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where did they shit and and piss? What did they use for loo roll? A god who creates a universe doesn't create a shower and toilet block! God was walking in the garden and trod in Adam and Eve's shit!

    • @leavingtheisland
      @leavingtheisland 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If only they had purchased AppleCare

    • @katfishkobain8809
      @katfishkobain8809 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@leavingtheisland and all they got was Apple Pay🍎

    • @mslice0760
      @mslice0760 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it was written in braille on the Apple

  • @Jim1971a
    @Jim1971a 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why did God command “Thou shall not kill” but he killed almost everyone in the flood?

  • @alwilliams5177
    @alwilliams5177 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    According to Dr Erhman, there are over a half million variants in manuscripts of which 99.9% don't effect meaning. Most of them result from the lack of standard spellings.

  • @HolgerGruber
    @HolgerGruber 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great as ever! One surplus, compared to most of your other talks: this one heavily benefits from the many questions and comments of your listeners.

  • @ld8936
    @ld8936 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For it is written: “I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectuals I will reject.” Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this system of things? Has not God made the wisdom of the world foolish? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not get to know God through its wisdom, God was pleased through the foolishness of what is preached to save those believing.

    • @dantallman5345
      @dantallman5345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The point being?

    • @ld8936
      @ld8936 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dantallman5345 What point was I making? I was simply quoting the words of the apostle a Paul (1 Corinthians 1:19-21) who in turn was quoting the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 29:14) who was actually quoting the words of the author of the Bible, Jehovah God. He mocks the pride and false wisdom of both those who proclaim them selves wise and the sycophants who praise them. Jehovah said: “I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectuals I will reject.“ As Paul put it, the “so called” wisdom of this world actually prevents them from getting to know God. The prophet Jeremiah predicted that; “The wise have been put to shame. They have become terrified and will be caught. Look! They have rejected the word of Jehovah, And what wisdom do they have? (Jeremiah 8:9)

    • @dantallman5345
      @dantallman5345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thx for the clarification. Although it was more or less what I expected, I do appreciate the specifics you provided. All the best.

    • @ld8936
      @ld8936 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dantallman5345 Thank you Dan

    • @tonygarrett7214
      @tonygarrett7214 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ld8936
      I think you have failed to grasp the point of the video. God was not the author of the Bible. You also need to do some research on the pre-Judaic, tribal pantheism from which monotheism evolved. You also seemed to have been snared by the trap in logic, of the propositional given; namely that god exists.

  • @jonathanzarco5697
    @jonathanzarco5697 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    13:10 again same misunderstanding GEN 2:3 finishes the story of creation and then goes in to detail. But the 7 day story ended GEN 2:4 is a chapter start

  • @scienceexplains302
    @scienceexplains302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is no major commandment against lying in general. “Bearing false witness against your neighbor,” refers to a specific lie against a fellow Jew.
    Leviticus 19:11 do not deal falsely or lie to each other (to the people receiving the message: Jewish men).
    The Bible rewards certain types of deception, such as Abraham and Isaac deceiving Pharaoh and gaining significant wealth from it.

    • @oliverford5367
      @oliverford5367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Yahwist author doesn't portray his heroes as perfect saints. They do a lot of naughty stuff. It's quite refreshing in a way.

    • @scienceexplains302
      @scienceexplains302 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@oliverford5367 Maybe. Does any religious text paint the heroes as perfect?

  • @telforenyte7632
    @telforenyte7632 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ten Commandments; the Constitution says you will not to put one religion above the other it does not say that you would do not have any religious references because of that. The Ten Commandments is one of the earliest set of laws and would belong outside a courthouse. It is foundational. With the Code of Hammurabi.

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      The issue with the Ten Commandments are not the universal laws, but the specifically religious ones and the commands we do not enforce in our legal codes.

    • @nickmartin123456
      @nickmartin123456 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      According to the book of Exodus itself, these are the 10 commandments:
      Exodus 34:10 Then the Lord said: “I am making a covenant with you. Before all your people I will do wonders never before done in any nation in all the world. The people you live among will see how awesome is the work that I, the Lord, will do for you. 11 Obey what I command you today. I will drive out before you the Amorites, Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites. 12 Be careful not to make a treaty with those who live in the land where you are going, or they will be a snare among you. 13 Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones and cut down their Asherah poles.[a] 14 Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
      15 “Be careful not to make a treaty with those who live in the land; for when they prostitute themselves to their gods and sacrifice to them, they will invite you and you will eat their sacrifices. 16 And when you choose some of their daughters as wives for your sons and those daughters prostitute themselves to their gods, they will lead your sons to do the same.
      17 “Do not make any idols.
      18 “Celebrate the Festival of Unleavened Bread. For seven days eat bread made without yeast, as I commanded you. Do this at the appointed time in the month of Aviv, for in that month you came out of Egypt.
      19 “The first offspring of every womb belongs to me, including all the firstborn males of your livestock, whether from herd or flock. 20 Redeem the firstborn donkey with a lamb, but if you do not redeem it, break its neck. Redeem all your firstborn sons.
      “No one is to appear before me empty-handed.
      21 “Six days you shall labor, but on the seventh day you shall rest; even during the plowing season and harvest you must rest.
      22 “Celebrate the Festival of Weeks with the firstfruits of the wheat harvest, and the Festival of Ingathering at the turn of the year.[b] 23 Three times a year all your men are to appear before the Sovereign Lord, the God of Israel. 24 I will drive out nations before you and enlarge your territory, and no one will covet your land when you go up three times each year to appear before the Lord your God.
      25 “Do not offer the blood of a sacrifice to me along with anything containing yeast, and do not let any of the sacrifice from the Passover Festival remain until morning.
      26 “Bring the best of the firstfruits of your soil to the house of the Lord your God.
      “Do not cook a young goat in its mother’s milk.”
      27 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write down these words, for in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.” 28 Moses was there with the Lord forty days and forty nights without eating bread or drinking water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant-the Ten Commandments.

  • @williambrewer
    @williambrewer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    27:50 I see no reason to conclude that the kings list goes hundreds of years past Moses.
    Gen 36:31-39 NHEB 31 These are the kings (it does not say descendants of Edom) who reigned in the land of Edom, before any king reigned over the children of Israel.
    1. Bela the son of Beor reigned in Edom. The name of his city was Dinhabah.
    2. When Bela died, and Jobab, the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his place.
    3. And Jobab died, and Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his place.
    4*. And Husham died, and Hadad the son of Bedad who struck Midian in the field of Moab reigned in his place. The name of his city was Avith.
    5. And Hadad died, and Samlah of Masrekah reigned in his place.
    6. And Samlah died, and Shaul of Rehoboth-on-the-River reigned in his place.
    7. And Shaul died, and Baal Hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his place.
    8. And Baal Hanan the son of Achbor died, and Hadad reigned in his place. The name of his city was Pau. His wife’s name was Mehetabel, the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Me-Zahab.
    *Because Hadad smote the Midianites, we have to conclude that the Midianites were already a people group by his time. So he reigned probably no earlier than around the time of the 12 patriarchs. But this is no problem because the story of Joseph has the Midianites already a people group by the time he sold it to slavery in Egypt. But this is still some 300 years before Moses and there are only four more kings listed after him!
    There is absolutely no reason to conclude that this kings list goes past the time of Moses.

  • @galaxymetta5974
    @galaxymetta5974 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul lied repeatedly to create a Christianity for the gentiles. The problem is there are many more self contradictory verses in the Bible.
    1) Paul admitted he lied in Romans 3.7, king james,
    For if the truth of god be abounded by my lie unto his glory, why yet am i also judged a sinner.
    2) Paul lied again by twisting the precious zion foundation stone in isaiah 28.16 into a stumbling stone and rock of offence in Romans 9.33.
    3). Paul lied again by twisting following the law required in deut 30.14 into following faith in Romans 10.8.
    4). Paul lied again by twisting jeremiah 31.32 (on Israeli breaking god covenant although god was a husband unto them) into hebrews 8.9 (Israeli break god covenant so god regarded them not).

  • @barnabuskorrum4004
    @barnabuskorrum4004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the irony that the Torah cant be changed except it's entire history has been changed.

  • @mae8861
    @mae8861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Wow and people really believe this stuff? Amazing!!!!

    • @johnmichaelson9173
      @johnmichaelson9173 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Evangelicals what can you say about them other than gullible?

    • @rodneysettle8106
      @rodneysettle8106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@johnmichaelson9173 they must refuse to actually understand the history and context of these stories and just believe what they read, and sheeple just believe what they hear.

    • @HighStakesDanny
      @HighStakesDanny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Basically the cause of all the current problems everywhere. It's craziness

    • @aninsimone
      @aninsimone 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know, the bible is fantastical

    • @SimplicityForGood
      @SimplicityForGood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      as in contrast to believing what!? Darwin? slow small changes that cannot even create the fossils we have today!? There are no simple answers to history and earth! If you think its, you certainly included yourself in all the people you just stated are lunatics ! you must be really naive to say the least... poorly educated kids like you seem to be all that is left of humanity today...

  • @arpthirteen6713
    @arpthirteen6713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They still have the color of the "ancient" Egyptians wrong.

    • @mattscott8512
      @mattscott8512 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just imagine what else being presented is wrong🤣😆...prince vigo lost his marbles long ago...articulate devil

  • @beesplaining1882
    @beesplaining1882 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is the guy giving this lecture? I'd be better if he gave that detail before speaking. Why would anyone watch this without knowing this.

  • @curtbressler3127
    @curtbressler3127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Before watching the video....my guess is: The Romans wrote the bible.
    After watching the video:
    J sounds like the original concepts set forth by paganism, egyptian, greek, etc.
    E is beginning to lay claim that Israel is the source of those earlier beliefs
    P & D is the Roman Catholicism (P) and Apologetic (D) takes on J & E
    R is simple post hoc apologetics
    At best, we know that it was written by people who had personal motivations to lay claim to what god is and what god wants.
    Knowing that Christianity is plagiarization of numerous earlier and dominant belief systems; the bible is written to lay claim of such beliefs as well as demonize those who continue to exercise those beliefs without paying fealty to the systemic hierarchy of Christianity.
    While this presentation focuses only on the bible, with a feint gesture to what came before it.
    It's more important to explore the origin of the contents of the bible with a study on how the bible has been distorted away from those origins.

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Um there is no reason to believe Romans had any power to alter Torah Jewish texts at any time, they could have exercised a lot of control of "New Testament" works tho, they would have needed collaborators.

    • @utahquarrydirect
      @utahquarrydirect 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you have any recommendations for content that explores the distortion of the origins of the content of the bible?

  • @BrianThomas
    @BrianThomas 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm curious 8:21 We're looking at English translations of scripture here. What does the Hebrew text say about these two sections of scripture that were pointed out? I realize things get lost in translation, but to be far. If it was 2, 7, or more. How does that negate the end result?

  • @Kristy_not_Kristine
    @Kristy_not_Kristine ปีที่แล้ว

    That's not the meaning of separation of church and state. Displaying the 10 Commandments isn't setting up a particular church/religion and forcing people to belong and believe.

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it is. The first part of the Ten Commandments are religious in nature towards a particular god: YHWH.
      Other commandments are not recognized in our legal code.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    For my part, I favour the "Entertainment Hypothesis". There are many modern examples.
    Jason and the Argonauts, The Fifth Voyage of Sinbad, Ali Baba's Forty Thieves staring Popeye.
    Popeye, as we all know, gets his strength from spinach. Catholics get it from the Eucharist.
    Notice that there is often a bad guy who is nearly as powerful as the hero (Lex Luther, Bruto, Satan etc).

    • @martynodonnell8467
      @martynodonnell8467 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, however you are forgetting one minor detail. Popeyes nemesis was called Bluto not Bruto

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@martynodonnell8467
      In 1957 Bluto's name was changed to Brutus for supposed copyright reasons.
      But I must admit I wus rong. Blow me down !
      But in the Italian, his name has been translated as Bruto, so I wus rite too !
      Where is the entrance to the exit ?

    • @IamRobinBanks
      @IamRobinBanks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tedgrant2yeah I also noticed that jehovah created lucifer to be as powerful as him. So powerful that to take him down, there had to be a war

  • @Matthias53787
    @Matthias53787 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is the speaker?

  • @kellyrodewald4075
    @kellyrodewald4075 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    And the 2 to keep alive with you would not include the ones to be sacrificed. Hence the phrase "keep alive with you"

  • @marymagnuson5191
    @marymagnuson5191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Moses would have spoken Egyptian - how would he have learned Hebrew?

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great point! In addition, they all would have spoken Egyptian because they were there for 400 years.

  • @bobbybright9334
    @bobbybright9334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The council of narcia write the bibles

    • @michaelhenry1763
      @michaelhenry1763 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Bibles were already around by 325 CE. It is just the New Testament had not been canonized yet. However, those books were not discussed at Nicea.

  • @YassineJ
    @YassineJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What he says at 1:08:00 is so true, that part is so boring and that''s where I stopped reading the Old Testament.

  • @fredyjames2476
    @fredyjames2476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    "Do not cook a kid in its mother's milk" means no cheese-burger :-)

    • @mercedm87
      @mercedm87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't mix milk products with milk. Not Kosher...!!!!

    • @patrickbryan4702
      @patrickbryan4702 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @MultiBagram Just simple minded ancient humans interpretation of of it.

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @MultiBagram he was wrong. The cult of dionysus would do that. So early jewish people rebelled.

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @MultiBagram the cult of dionysus did that

    • @mungox1
      @mungox1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did God say don't eat meat and any milk products in the same meal. That is what the Jews call Kosher & not what was written.
      Is it allowed to eat a hamburger then 15 min later to have milk ice cream ?
      Can I eat a beef hamburger with goat cheese ?
      The audience were herdsmen who know what calf came form what cow, that makes it easy to not mix the two.

  • @ztimbo
    @ztimbo ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr. DeMille cleared up any possible contradictions in his Exodus and presented the true version in living color. It is known.

  • @Phdintheory
    @Phdintheory 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Aye yam that I yam, I'm Popeye the sailor man!

  • @dodgydavy1969
    @dodgydavy1969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Try reading the book of Enoch the God'S were the Annunaki and they said Come let US make man in OUR image to be like US !Man was already here !

    • @frankwilliams4445
      @frankwilliams4445 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What? Can you elaborate I don't understand what you mean by this

  • @petersclafani4370
    @petersclafani4370 ปีที่แล้ว

    The question should be who altered the Bible.

  • @randyg.7940
    @randyg.7940 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    They were there for the free pizza

  • @vinm300
    @vinm300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Redactor = one who redacts a work especially : editor.
    The Great Redactor .....
    The Documentary hypothesis identifies four distinct narratives :-
    a) Jahwist
    b) Elohist
    c) Deuteronomist
    d) Priestly accounts.
    And the Great Redactor, who edited the four accounts into one text. (Some argue the redactor was Ezra the scribe)

  • @MarcoMeerman
    @MarcoMeerman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sometimes the recordings starts after you start the lecture.

  • @kellyrodewald4075
    @kellyrodewald4075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There is no PINK text. this is a hit job

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This guy is a con man Pharisee. The people he is talking to are lazy idiot's. Sad. But only a few are called out.

    • @yohei72
      @yohei72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hold your breath, maybe that will make it not true.

  • @Sportliveonline
    @Sportliveonline 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sound low

  • @inulomar1776
    @inulomar1776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Desert dwelling goat hearders around 2000 years ago and mostly plagiarized from other fables

    • @godhasgivenussalvationinth5223
      @godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      completly false, when you see lies on the internet always check if it's true or false dont just believe .everybody can make a propaganda built on lies always check by yourself if the informations you hear are true or are lies always.always check by yourself.

    • @AO_Rourke
      @AO_Rourke 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 exactly! This guy hasn’t a clue. We are much better off to read our book and not check if it makes any sense. We can just say it’s faith, that way we don’t need to check. Yay us right?

    • @godhasgivenussalvationinth5223
      @godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AO_Rourke no i've checked all thoses theories are false. you can believe lies if you want. it's not because some theories are propagated that they are true , you know theories and documentaries can be lies as well.

    • @AO_Rourke
      @AO_Rourke 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 and books? Can they be lies too?

    • @godhasgivenussalvationinth5223
      @godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AO_Rourke lots of demon inspired books of lies are selled a lot yes.

  • @aleonyohan6745
    @aleonyohan6745 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The fact that intelligent people believe any of this is absolutely mind boggling. You seriously can't tell that the Bible was written by angry old men? You'd be less a fool to believe in Santa Claus.

    • @soaringbumnm8374
      @soaringbumnm8374 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't believe in Santa ?

    • @aleonyohan6745
      @aleonyohan6745 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@soaringbumnm8374 I don't do the believe thing. I use the scales of probability. I'm giving Santa Claus a 9.73 which I figure is a pretty generous number.

  • @chrispreston256
    @chrispreston256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    7 of the clean 2 of the unclean. Never heard a pastor go past 2 by 2.

    • @SaulKopfenjager
      @SaulKopfenjager 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ... also is it 7 pairs & two pairs meaning 14 & 4.... pastors?

    • @kinanshmahell8065
      @kinanshmahell8065 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      7 clean animals in one part and two of both clean and unclean animals in one other part

    • @chrispreston256
      @chrispreston256 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kinanshmahell8065 but it's 100% true

  • @anfiach
    @anfiach 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I stopped watching after 8 minutes. If you can't understand that 7 pairs and the animals coming by twos (by pairs) are not contradictory, I cannot take the rest seriously.

  • @TunaFreeDolphinMeat
    @TunaFreeDolphinMeat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank Cod I am an atheist.

  • @ktom5262
    @ktom5262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just stop asking questions and waiting for answers from the audience. Waste of time.

  • @liokuul
    @liokuul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The story about Noah's ark not only demonstrate the limitations of this god, but also utterly daft..

    • @suatustel746
      @suatustel746 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never mind the Noah's Ark in order to mention his benevolence mercy, magniliquence , just take into account the extinction of Dinasaurs sentient beings blatantly perished front of his eyes, what attempt ever he made to rescue from extinction....!!!

    • @brahmburgers
      @brahmburgers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Noah's Ark is a good little story for kids, .....but some of us grow up and mature.

    • @suatustel746
      @suatustel746 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brahmburgers then you must include the other parables as well such as Adam&Eve..

    • @OFR
      @OFR 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Such as only 2 of each animal could never repopulate the Earth.

  • @TarekFahmy
    @TarekFahmy ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing lecture...

  • @peterb0915
    @peterb0915 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The pink quotation says "they came by twos", while the blue says "take seven pairs". There's no contradiction here: once 7 pairs of the the clean animal came the rest were turned away. It didn't say they all gt on the ark, just that they came to Noah who then sorted them out.

    • @AO_Rourke
      @AO_Rourke 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤣

    • @nickmartin123456
      @nickmartin123456 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Genesis 6: 19 You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. 20 Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive.
      Genesis 7:2 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth.

  • @TSHEKHAN
    @TSHEKHAN 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wrong audience.

    • @HammerHeadzzz
      @HammerHeadzzz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      C.L. I was thinking the same thing, tough crowd

    • @randyg.7940
      @randyg.7940 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HammerHeadzzz THE ONL;Y ONES THAT SHOWED UP ....

  • @r3negade_182
    @r3negade_182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    51:00 The scripture doesn’t say pharaoh lies with Sarah 🧐

  • @nathanforrest3483
    @nathanforrest3483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'll tell you a secret.
    It was me !

  • @aclem8246
    @aclem8246 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No contradiction in Genesis on how many animals. The animals came in pairs. One male and one female. The bible just didn't specify how many pairs in the separate examples.

  • @Lek_2.O
    @Lek_2.O 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The 6th massive extinction, was a total flooding on a flat earth.

    • @ChristopherCudworth
      @ChristopherCudworth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wrong

    • @melrichardson7709
      @melrichardson7709 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Err, if the earth was flat, wouldn't the all the water just pour over the edge? 🤔🤫

    • @frankwilliams4445
      @frankwilliams4445 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No because our Earth is contained. We have a firmament

  • @jonathanzarco5697
    @jonathanzarco5697 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:14 thing my brother is first there is the what will happen then the how it happened. That the animals came in pairs of two. Doesn't mean there aren't still seven separate pairs.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Its interesting that he rips the Bible to pieces, yet somehow it's still all true if you read between the lies.

    • @mythme01
      @mythme01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      so you think the flood, the exodus and the tower of Babel all happened, huh?

    • @mslice0760
      @mslice0760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the @@mythme01 there is lots of evidence for the flood and the tower of bab. (base of the construction) is still there in Baghdad

    • @TonyTigerTonyTiger
      @TonyTigerTonyTiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@mslice0760 The Genesis Flood Myth is scientifically refuted. It also refuted historically/archaeologically.

    • @mslice0760
      @mslice0760 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TonyTigerTonyTiger historical, ......there are over 200 flood stories around the world,....(.8 people in a large boat with a diverse amount of animals,) this is a global account, not local,.......Chinese geologists just confirmed that what they originally thought was a local flood ,was 500 times greater,.....the erosion rate of Niagara Falls goes back to a straight edge, the same year of Noah's flood.,....science has not debunked a global flood account..

    • @TonyTigerTonyTiger
      @TonyTigerTonyTiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mslice0760 The Genesis Flood Myth is scientifically refuted, and also refuted historically/archaeologically.
      If there had been a biblical flood - a worldwide flood, that covered the tallest mountains, and killed all life on earth except for the 2 or 14 individuals of each “kind” that were on Noah's ark (a massive wooden boat supposedly built by a man who was allegedly over 500 years old), only about 4400 years ago - there would be clear evidence that it occurred:
      a) There would be evidence all over the world of a mass extinction about 4400 years ago.
      b) There would be evidence of genetic bottlenecks in all land species, occurring about 4400 years ago.
      c) The upper strata of the Grand Canyon would be only about 4400 years old (instead of being over 200 million years old), since Creationists claim those layers were laid down by the flood.
      None of the above 3 is the case.
      Note: The Grand Canyon refutes the Young Earth Creationists’ claims about the Genesis Flood Myth in several additional ways.

  • @p.a.andrews7772
    @p.a.andrews7772 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ALWAYS BLAME THE RICH FIRST FOR EVERYTHING !!!

    • @BlacksmithTWD
      @BlacksmithTWD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Na, find the capslock key first.

    • @lorit.3007
      @lorit.3007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂

  • @janicemurphy7878
    @janicemurphy7878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You do realize you're making sense out of nonsense.j Awm

  • @seDj64
    @seDj64 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is the lecturers name?

    • @davidsarif2481
      @davidsarif2481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      John Hamer

    • @mae8861
      @mae8861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fake news?

    • @HOWBAZARY
      @HOWBAZARY 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The deaf lead the blind astray.

  • @shawnbriscoe8258
    @shawnbriscoe8258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There is no conflict except when you try to force modern book writing rules to an assembly of individual writings. There is no contradiction. The first instruction is focused on propagation. The second on practicality.
    So, for example, saying every home must have mom and dad now, and saying there should be at least one child in the home later, is in no means contrary nor contradictory. We only do this with this book! WHY?!!