F-16s vs. MiG-29s: The Battle for Ukraine's Air Supremacy Unveiled
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
- The skies above Ukraine have become a battleground for two of the most iconic fighter jets of the Cold War era: the American F-16 Fighting Falcon and the Soviet MiG-29 Fulcrum. As the war grinds on, questions have swirled about the potential deployment of Western fighter jets, with the F-16 emerging as the frontrunner to bolster Ukraine's air force against Russian dominance.
In late March 2023, a significant milestone was reached when the decision was greenlit to permit the sale of pre-owned Mikoyan MiG-29 fighter jets from Slovakia and Poland to Ukraine. This move was presented as a game-changer, especially after the US announced its decision to allow Western allies to supply advanced fighter jets, including American-made F-16s, to Ukraine during the G7 summit in Hiroshima.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Russia has few Mig-29s. A modernized version, Mig-35 is used but more important fighter aircraft are descendants of the Su-27. Last year a Su-35 downed a Ukrainian Su-27 flying 271 km away.
Which russian air-to-air missile has 271km range?
Are you right in the head my friend?
@@Andersp90, r 37m . Read a little and get out of your echo chamber.
Foxbat
@@Andersp90 R37M has a range of 400km.
You are comparing the Iraqi Mig-29As from 80’s to the F-16. The Russian jets are completely different animal than the ones they sell to the Middle East countries. They all had a modified Mig23 radar from early 60’s 😂😂😂😂.
F 16 obsolètes 1976😅😅
Actually, this guy is talking about the Slovak and Zpolish MiG-29s donated in 2023 and discusses the superiority do the donated F-16MLUs ocer them. As far as I know, the MiG-29/ 35was employed very limited in this conflict the vast majority of the Eastern EuropeanMiG-29s were export versions 29A, with various minor upgrades to the communication and navigation equipment
You can really spot the homers here
👹👺👺you lee propagande
F16 and mig 29 is obsolètes all and f35 do not résist in s400 russe or s300
there won't be any air vs air, it will be air vs air defense
someone in this channel learned war from top gun maverik.
It won't be the F-16 versus the MIG-29. It will be the F-16 against the SU-30/34/35, the Mig-31, the MIG-35, all of which will be supported by the A-50 , ground radars and S-300, S-350, S-400, BUK, and Pantsir, air defense systems. The F-16s have the life expectancy of a housefly.
Lol... you beat me to it... nice summary
and yet they still use Garmin navigation devices having all that u mentioned :D
Right, and how many of those planes have been shot down by Ukraine 😂😂
@@allenboniface8010 They’ve lost up to 12 SU-34s, which are flying close to the combat line. The losses are due to air defenses, not aircraft. An A-50 was shot down and a IL-76, 77also by air defenses. Russian Air Force has destroyed some air defense systems recently. The F-16s are capable of delivering nuclear weapons and that is the main threat the Russians are worried about. If they are used as air support for Ukrainian troops, they risk being destroyed by Russian air defenses. In any case, the Russians can destroy them on the ground, once they track them back to their bases. Or the MIG-31 can hit them from 100 miles away. The F-16 face steep odds.
@@blatneyev3740 Well there is many available for replacement so no problem.
Why you compare F16 to Mig29? Russia won't use Mig29, they will use Mig31.
Because the Ukraine received both these planes, the Mig 29 from Polands arsenal and the F-16 from the US, both to defend Ukraine. The video isn't about Russia vs. the Ukraine's Air forces.
@@robwilson3749 I had the funny feeling thats the video is actually IS about the Ukrainian and the Russian air forces!!!!!!
@@robwilson3749 ukraine hasnt received f-16 yet.
@@karlhans6678 I see that the US ok'd the Netherlands to give Ukraine 6 of the F-16's but that they're stalling sending them. I stand corrected. Apparently the video producer presumes they will in fact arrive.
Probably because that's what Ukraine has.
f-16 is the same as leopard2 and challenger 2, overhyped, overestimated relicts of old era but propaganda can sell it as "the most advanced, modern wonder weapons what can kill everything at higher distance whatever it face"
its like upgrading a car, i can put tesla engines, touch screen and other fancy stuff in my 20 years old Punto, but its still a 20 years old Punto
Well one thing is better, Russia doesn't have 100,000 Anti tank mines in the air preventing anything from moving!
You must love your Pinto, that is 😂
You seem to over estimate the F 16 while on the other hand under estimating the Mig 29 fulcrum, and even giving a higher edge of the F 16 over other Russian fighter jets like the S.U. 27 Flanker, and many other Russian fighter jets. Your story seems to be stranger than fiction.
Surah 3:151: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve (all non-Muslims) …"
Surah 2:191: "And kill them (non-Muslims) wherever you find them … kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers (non-Muslims)."
Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush …".
You don't understand. If it's one on one, most high end fighter jets don't really have much advantage over the others (F-15s, Super Hornets, Typhoons, Su-35s, Rafael, etc).... especially if they're told all they have to do is out maneuver the other guys in a 1960 - 80s, classical dog-fighting situation.
But if you coupled the F-15, F-16, Super Hornet, Rafale, Typhoon, etc. with advanced avionics, electronics, radars, and the Patriot system ---- as all NATO capable fighter jets and bombers are --- Russia really is at a disadvantage.
Keep in mind, Russia has LESS capable high-end fighter jets & other supporting aircraft than does the SMALLEST branch of the US Armed Forces, the US Marines. But it's not only that. Those assets MUST be used to protect a nation that is 90% of the COMBINED lands of the US and China, the 3rd and 4th largest land on earth.
Russia doesn't operate on magic or alien technologies.
Hell, it has ZERO capability to produce any mid range to high-end semi conductor chips, both of which are 100% necessary in 100% of her sophisticated radars, electronics, avionics, missiles, machines, and aircraft.
China could produce up to 10mn - 7nm chips and those are mid-range-ish chips; but 5nm and beyond, China also can't produce them.
Russia still is using the CIA's 1950s and 60s shell company tactics, when it comes to getting its mid range to high-end semi conductor needs met.
(Remember, the CIA use shell companies in those decades to buy titanium from the USSR to build half a dozen or so SR-71 & a few other such experimental/spy jets, due to the lack of easily available titanium back then.)
The Russians are not stupid, as another highly educated NORTHERN EUROPEAN people (they are NOT Asians, Africans, or 3rd World people). But that also also is a TWO-EDGED SWORD situation: they also MUST have access to technologies that are used by the US and Western Europe, as well as Eastern Asian countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan.
Again, Russia DOES NOT operate on magic or alien technologies.
100% of the advanced nations that build expensive, high-end machines and weapons systems.... they ALL must use advanced semi conducting chips. And Taiwan, ALONE, produces between 80% to 90% of the CURRENT HIGH-END CHIPS all advanced machines, military equipment, weapons systems, etc. used around the world.
The US, Western Europe, South Korea, and Japan combined produce up to 20% of those high-end chips that TSMC, Taiwan, is doing.
But the DUTCH are the only people who make, currently, the LASER MACHINE needed for the fabrication of those high-end chips that TSMC, Intel, Samsung, Sony, etc. are doing.
ASML is that company.
Again, not everyone could just wave their own technological magic wand and whatever they want to do... could be done.
There always is a BOTTLE NECK in high-end technologies.
The countries and companies that control such technological bottle necks are USUALLY in the US, in Western Europe, or in Eastern Asian countries.
Russia doesn't have free or easy access to THOSE HIGH-END TECHNOLOGIES, her high-end military assets AIN'T GONNA BE 10 - 20 years "more advanced than Western" stuff, as Trump's MOSCOW friend, Comrade KGB Col. Putin, off-hand-ishly asserts.
That's just not how technology or reality works.
Again, Russian things like the mid 1900s AK-47s, the 1960-80s Su-35, etc. are VERY GOOD.
But they aren't the most advanced, most up to date tech stuff in the world...
@@kiabtoomlauj6249
I ain't reading allat
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Also, I suspect that Russian pilots aren't as well-trained or well-motivated as Ukrainian pilots.
@@reverseflash7007 Why the phuc are you reporting to me what you're reading or not reading on-line? I wasn't assigned as your high school reading teacher... There are TOPICS on-line. You come across them & you either read & exchange ideas... or you don't. You DON'T NEED to be posting to topics, or individual posters, you can't read or don't read! You lazy, stupid kids these days are just so tragic and hilarious at the same time! LOL
I enjoy watching this channel and the music, but let's be real, the F16 doesn't have a chance against Russia, anyone who knows a little about Aircrafts know this.
1) F16s will go against S400, Su 30, Su35 which are much better than the Mig 29
2) Dog fights are rare to happen in real life, the Russians can see and engage the F16 from a much farther range ...
3) So, unless the USA is planning to send them 1000 F16s or dozen F22s... sending a dozen F16s won't change a thing, same as the overhyped Leopards
I agree. Only if they send at least a 100 F 16s, can they make an impact. Also, they would need to give Ukraine platforms like AWACS and Mid Air refuelers, both of which Ukraine lacks, to fully utilize the F 16's
@@dreamhunter2973 Or safe airfields.
Depends on the equipment that carried by these aircraft
I chuckle every time I see a new article about the F-16 and its virtues. I built a model of the F-16-----in 1979-----when I was a boy. Yet, here it is, not only STILL in widespread use, but STILL relevant, people STILL arguing whether its the "best" against more modern types. Incredible. FORTY-FIVE years since the plane went operational. In WW2, a new fighter was laughably obsolete in 45 MONTHS. This tells me that the plane no longer matters now; the weapon does.
Exactly.
Q. Which Mig29 are you talking about???
Ans. The 1976
People. Now we understand you
😂😂😂😂
It isn't so much the aircraft as it is the ammo. You get a fire and forget missile longer that goes further than your enemy they die first if his flares don't work. However, moments later if your flares don't work, then the score is tied...
Rather than saying "The skys above Ukraine have become a battleground". You should have said "will soon become a battleground". Unless I'm missing something, they haven't clashed just yet.😁
Ukraine doesn't have the capability nor are they likely to. They need thier jets to launch stormshadows.
They can't afford to lose them, The russians can.
It all depends on the pilot & equipment. As we can see Ukraine isn't winning on the ground, a few fighter jets won't change anything.
LOL! After 2 years, Russia still has only taken 18% of Ukraine. If you call that winning, you're drinking too much vodka. Also, what happened to Kyiv in 3 days?
Its not the mig 29 you have to worry about. Its the su35 and the mig31.
You will need all of the AWACs and supporting equipment to go with them. Modern fighter jets are unlikely to ever dog fight Battle of Britain style. The F16 will quickly fall foul to Russian anti aircraft missiles, jamming and attacks whilst on the ground if they are operated from Ukrainian soil.
A good pilot makes a mediocre plane unbeatable, a under or untrained pilot will get downed in the latest plane. Been proven many times.
All of the comparisons are great however it still comes down to pilot training competence.
It seems like the MIG29 is more comparable to the F15 Tomcat
F-15 Eagle - F-14 Tomcat
The Amazing Pig-39 is only comparable to the slightly superior G-13 Dumbdog!
You forgot to mention that 23 or so of these F16s had been Cannalised because of air frame defects also they are only single burner and that the warranty on them all has lapsed... thats why they are being given away... sort of saving on scraping fees ...
Teh US AMRAAM missile, range ~150km, doesn't see the SU 57 RM37, range 400 km coming until Goodbye..
Ukraine is getting an older f 16 not the ones the us has.
Any prediction when we see first footage of F-16 over Ukraine? And more importantly which country it will take off from? There has to be a reason why it has not happened despite talks about F-16 going for almost a year now?
And if it it is just for talking, why not compare F-35 vs SU -57? both won't happen, but that doesn't mean we can't talk about it?
SU 57 is going to fuck up any of our flying machines I kid you not
This guy has no clue what he is talking about. As an example, JHMCS helmet is not NVG compatible. The F-16s he is talking about are at the 6th upgrade iteration, while the MiG-29s are in yje original 1978 export, less capable version
The lasts F-16 have a radar that for the Mig-29 it's a pure dream.
F-16s this year, F-35s next year, and NGD fighter after that!!!
america never accept defeat 😂😂😂 its a wait and see scenario.
We learned a lot of things when the Cold War ended and a lot of documents became available. One thing we learned was that east block pilots only flew btw 35-40% training sorties of that of NATO pilots - in 5 years thats a huge difference mounting to approx 5-700 hours.
The German Squadron Leader would disagree with the Polish opinion. Mig-29's were delivered to East Germany not long before Germany's unification.
The German guy flew this late 1980's version against F-14's, F-15's, F16's and F18's at the time.
The biggest criticism of the Mig-29 was it's lack of range and the avionics were not the latest available. But it outflew all four US aircraft and was the best dogfighter bar none.
Russian AAM's were found to be as good if not better than the US equivalent.
This report is on the internet and makes good (surprising) reading.
I'd compare the F-16 with the Sukhoi 34 & 35.
F16 are not supposed to be in Ukraine for now. They wait for the planes for months (even years).
It all comes down to the skill of the pilots.
The Russians don’t use the Mig 29, Russia uses the Mig 35, Su 34 , Su 57 , Euro - fighter Typhoon, the F16 is old , you said that about the US tanks .
The "Meeeg 29"??
That''s why Poutin feared US f-16!
Whoever has the most missles will decide
Their going to be flown against more than the mig 29s though.
Russia isn't using Mig-29s... SU 34/35 I'd imagine and 57 as they come on board...
But there have been no aerial confrontations between these aircraft in the theater
Russia doesn't use the Mig-29 as a frontline fighter if anything the Mig -35 a upgrade of the platform would be what they would use and it's unlikely that there would be any dogfights as the S-400 will be activated once the F-16's come online in the theater
PAK F-16 was down by IAG Mig-21 how about that.
😂
This raw propaganda😂😂😂
Oh I get it.. by comparing it to a Mig-29... It makes the F-16 look totally awesome... F-16 is a good plane but can be unstable and finnicky and is over 40 years old in it's own right... will still take a LONG time for Ukrainian pilots to become proficient... and the F-16s you described won't be the ones they're getting
Smells like anti Russian propaganda to me 😂😂😂
F-16 is superior to the Russian made ....... We've been here before. There is a junkyard in eastern ukraine full of superior western equipment. 😂
Why even compare F-16s to MiG-29s when Russia has been phasing out the MiG-29, and replacing them with MiG-34s and MiG-35s? Comparing the F-16 to the latest generation of Russian designed and made Sukhoi, the twin-engine stealth multirole fighter aircraft Su-57, might be more apt.
It's understood in military aviation you never compare a single-engine fighter against a dual-engine machine. They are apples and oranges.
Что я думаю? Я думаю...через 1-2 года Украины уже не будет!💀 Поэтому эта сравнительная дискуссия... является чепухой! Так просто...👍
If Russia modernizes its MiG-29properly and at least 100 F-16s, there is no chance in air combat. The MiG-29 was built for dominance on the nabowhile the F16 is a multi-functional aircraft, of course you can't compare the MiG-29 from the 80s with the modernization of the MiG-29, the MiG-29 in the best version had zuk radar that is not bad but it is still a little outdated, in addition to ZUK radar there is also H019 both versions of radar have their own modernizations that go for ZUK from ZUK M through ME and all the way to ME 3, and as for H019 here we have E, EM and MS modernizations that were done very quickly and easily until 2016 and, in essence today it is very simple to reinforce the radar and these versions of modernization are mainly made for export, which gives radar with a range of 120 km to 160 km, which is not so bad but I am also sure that Russia today for its army can determine it much better and in We're not talking about the same plane anymore. If the F-16 and MiG-29 radars are more or less the same range and the possibility is there.There is no longer a dilemma which plane is better, we all know that the R 77, R 60, R 73 and 27 rockets are repeatedly modernized and proven good missiles the only thing that remains as a question of whether a single-engine aircraft can fight a twin-engine? We all know that there will be all the other Aircraft of the Russian Air Force as well as the air defense systems?!?!
Russians dont't use MIG 29 any more and this video is outh of date.
I love the F16. I grew up watching them from my backyard. I have spent 40 years of my life focused on that platform.
The F16 isn't suitable for the climate in Ukraine. There is nothing the F16 can't do. It can ground pound like the A10 and dominant the air space. But to do this, the F16 requires a massive amount of support. The radar is good but small. Without AWAC support, the F16 can only see about 60 miles at best on flat ground.
The others massive problem is range. The F14 needs AA refueling because it can only hold 7900 pounds of gas internal. Thats about 1.5 hours of very high easy flying. In a loaded combat situation it can consume 8000 pounds of gas in 15 min. This is why you almost never see a F16 without external baggs. The maximum amount of gas with 3 full baggs is only 140000 pounds of gas. This adds about 50% more range.
So if the f16 is stated in Kyiv it will be out of gas by time it gets to the combat zones.
All fighter jets in this war are very vulnerable to both SAM and Air to Air missiles. Both sides must carefully pick their opportunities to send their precious experienced pilots into dangerous skies. The F16s give Ukraine some more modern electronics and radars over their old Mig-29s. Neither side will be looking for fighter-against-fighter matchups.
Russia is not using old crap Mig-29.
the F16 fighting falcon is a great Jet
but what said here about the Mig29 is so funny and misleading !!
F16 that Ukraine does not have in 2024 😂😂😂
Nothing depends on the pilot and the training with F16 in Ukraine. It'll be downed by Russian air defense as soon as it gets in range. I'm not even going to comment on the fact that there is no way Russia will send old MiG29s on F16s... Sending F16s to Ukraine is like bringing a knife to a gunfight. That's why they are stalling the deliveries because they know they overhyped it...
F-16s are already in Ukraine
@@gunmasterx1164 Yeah, right, Ray Charles saw them 😂😂😂
@@markomicunovic5896 I have a screenshot of it
I thought the issue is "Where do you want all these spare parts"?
Haha, in dogfights in the past the F16 never won.
You are comparing the USAF F-16 Block 70/72 data sheet to an old export MiG-29 9-12A, the 16's Ukraine will be getting are old secondhand export fighters with very tired airframes. I very much doubt they are going to have the look down shootdown capabilities. The US will not allow that tech to be shot down and recovered by Russia. And they sure as hell won't have the latest electronics.
But it still cant escape the SAM😅😅🤣🤣🤣
No difference with or without f16
Did Indian Air Force Mig-21 downed a Pakistan Air Force F-16?
The AI says it as
Meeg 29😂
Bro... Your Lies are not even subtle anymore.
Why don't you try a comparison of a su35s or su57 felon. F16 don't match up. They say f16s have nevrr been shot down its because they stay on the ground when the su35s and su57 are in the air. They're faster, bigger and better maneuverability. Ukraine vlaims they've shot down a su35 but there is never any video or pictures of the aftermath.
Im not sure if this is an accurate statement especially that F16 will be facing RUSSIAN MiGs NOT EXPORT versions of it
The downing of so many Russian aircraft lately means NATO is helping the Ukranians soften up the airspace for the imminent arrival of the F-16s
Where west Technology? Where Leopard, Challenger, Bradley, Maxxpro, Abrams?
its all about pilot, and Ukraine has Ghost of Kyiv, so they already won :) Slava
This video is completely BS.
Cjeck how ((former)
East Germany pilotd with MIG 29 humiliate NATO air force on military exercise.
There are US, UK, and all kind of European airplanes.
However, all depend of pilots.
Btw. Ukraine will get old F 16....
Russia will use new SU 35
U can't write proper English let alone fly a fighter jet.
Pakai data yg real bos
Don't just talk blindly. Without knowing the reality Russian mig's have updated time to time not like Ukrainian aircraft that doesn't produce any aircraft
Mig 29 ??? Can you just say its a flying LADA. But we already know F16 is a fantastic war bird
"We" have no clue what "we" are talking about. Would that be the same F-16 that couldn't shoot down a "Chinese spy balloon" over Lake Huron with two Sidewinders at $ 400K a crack?
@@ryszardrakowski2711 lmao good luck. Fly that Lada
@@patrickkavanagh5335 so you want to explain how exactly is the F-16 a "fantastic war bird"? What is so "fantastic" about it?🤣
@@ryszardrakowski2711 I guess you will just have to see for yourself.
@@patrickkavanagh5335 yup. Cannot wait. F-16s will be as much of a "game changer as Leotards, Challenged 2s Abramses and Patriots. It will be hilarious🤣!!!
s300 and s400 most dangerous than fighters, and russian air to air missle range far than f16.
What a waste of time.
This report is based off one polish pilots report lol.
It doesnt even tell us what version aircraft were used !!!
It could be the latest F16 vs the first mig 29 lol.
This is scary to listen to and to think about. OOOOOM.🌳🌏🌎🌍🤞🏻✌🏻✌✌🏼✌🏽✌🏾✌🏿💙
American F-16 is far superior than their Russian counterparts MiG 29, Su 27 & Su 30. This was proved in an areal engagement between Pakistani and Indian Air Forces, where two F16s shot down Su30 and Mig19 fighters with AIM 120 C missiles.
MiG19??!?!? That's an era long past my friend...
Indian mig 21 down f16 of Pakistan 🇵🇰
Ukraine getting F-16's is pointless. They wont last long with Russian air defense systems.
You mean the air defence that watched British Stormshadow missiles hit an airbase and did nothing to defend it?
@@gunmasterx1164 You mean the only air defence capable of downing Stormshadows which it has actually done on multiple occasions?
@@markomicunovic5896you mean the air defence that keeps shooting its own planes down.
@@gunmasterx1164 Source: Trust me bro
@@markomicunovic5896 Well what do you know an A-50 shot down by their own air defence how about that 😂😂😂
Не было учтено, что после распада Советского Союза дальнейшего развития МиГ-29 не последовало, что «остановилось вовремя»! F-16, чья конструкция СТАРЕЕ И МЕНЬШЕ СЛОЖНАЯ, чем у МиГ-29, постоянно обновляется в своей конструкции, авионике и возможностях... но это все еще СТАРЫЙ ИСТРЕБИТЕЛЬ! Для более достойного сравнения автору видео было бы правильно использовать старый F-16C, 70-х/80-х годов, а не последних версий! Для более справедливого сравнения надо использовать новые МиГ-35, которые находятся на завершающих испытаниях! Этот пойдёт со всем самым современным в оборонке нашей страны, не оставляя в стороне себестоимость, на экспорт! Именно это происходит с F-16 «Блок III» и т. д. модернизированными, но все же более дешевыми истребителями, которые США используют на экспорт, следуя линии МиГ-35! Фактически, стоит отметить, что США не приобрели для своих ВВС ни одного истребителя F-16 с 2004 года, что доказывает, насколько они уже устарели!💀
Lmao Ukraine has no airpower wtf
Yeah yeah, they don't have a Navy either
su - 35 ?
F16 are useles to the Ukraine as they take years to learn how to fly properly.
Well we'll be seeing a repeat of the modern super tanks that were supposed to win the war for the Ukrainians lol. This video forgot the SUkoy 57 which can defeat the F-35 and Russia can actually maintain their aircraft.
Not to mention Europe cannot even match ammo production of Russia.
If that's the case then ukraine and US led NATO will only need F-16s to win the war. 😂
But im sorry I dont think even F22s will make any difference in Ukraine Russia war. 😂
The biggest mistake Ukraine and US led NATO had was under estimating Russia's war capabilities.
Wrong comparison. Try old F16 v. Soviet Su27. F16 DOA. Try reality: old F16 v. Su57. Dead on ground before take off. Next...F35...sorry headache...
Military tv is obsessed with USA weapons and i have seen many you tube channels doing that . 👎👎👎
F16 is not modern, no jet anymore, this is a toy. If we compare it to state of the art China and Russia planes.
Where all the advanced ru/ch planes? Afraid of patriot system.
Patriot PAC 2 and PAC 3 can do nothing, it s toy. MACH 10 - 11 is 3 times faster and missiles have 100 mm armouring, so you can shut down A320 ot B737 but not russian missiel. Bye. Go to shcool, study 50 years in Russian language, and doo not post stupid commentrs. @@stephenseibold6116
Where are USA planes ? NATO planes ? In red sea USA lost war with Yemen and 150 000 Houties, because of USA nad IDF incompetence. @@stephenseibold6116
State of the art China planes? Do you mean the ones made of tofu dregs?
F 16 not resist in russia😅😅😅😅😅😅
Russia........is POTATO with side of VODKA.
Ukraine has a stand-up comedian as president.
I mean I love Jay Leno but not for president of US. (Biden is funnier)
😂
F-16
The problem with Americans is concentrating on boosting about what they have, underate and under mine other countries' is the same reason why they have never won any war on thier own. If F16 is the best then why is Ukraine losing the war to Russia??? 😂😂😂😂
There's a difference between too much talking and actually delivering with actions.
America with is NATO members lime talking too much while countries in the east are quiet busy working with actions😂😂😂
But NATO, No Action Talk Only 😂😂😂
You mean Poland cannot have a vassal state Ukraine as they used to?
Stupid video. The F-16's will augment Mig-29's of the Ukrainian AF going up against the Su-35's of the Russians. Get your propaganda at least in the same room.
garbage , to old for modern warfare.
How many Russian Migs have been upgraded like the F16.
The F16 block 70 has superior radar to any Russian fighter including Su57. The Aesa on the F16 is equal to the F35s radar on the block 70 version. Even the Block 52 version is comparable to the Su 35M or better than Russia's Pesa Radar.
One thing I've learned is that the $1 Trillion dollar US have invested in research and development shoes why US is king when it comes to developing weapons of Fidelity!
Does the F-16 see a target at a distance of 400km with a size of 1 m2? I doubt it very much.
Ukrainian pilots will fail, USA pilots have much better training
Yes. True.
They're being trained by USA pilots 😂
"Texas has best warm water ports" 😂
First, Ukrainian pilots are being trained in Arizona. The last time I checked, Arizona was in the USA. Second, Ukrainian soldiers have a reputation for overperforming, while Russian soldiers have a reputation for underperforming. I don't have a crystal ball, so I'm not making any predictions, but I'm watching the news to see how the F-16's perform in combat against Russian pilots.
На бумаге красиво. Но F-16 по факту уже давно устарели. Их сбивают даже устаревшие средства ПВО России! МИГ 29 это тоже прошлое поколение. Сегодня актуальны МИГ 31 !!! И вообще любые сравнения могут быть только в конкретном бою! Что касается тупого рассказа про ракету - выпустил и забыл, так она и упадет хер знает где. Цель все равно по факту должна быть указана! Ну и главное не воздушный бой а средства ПВО которые эти F16 сбивают как орешки!
I am a little rusty on my Cyrillac
So based on your Russia failed propaganda all Russia has is Mig 29! Mig 31 doesn’t exist🤣🤣🤣
LGBTQ+++ f16 - welcome to ua grave field!
To say hi to bredly, leopard n other manly love western transportation 😮
Wanna trade your '68-'72 Shelby Mustang for my '70 Lada Жигули? I also trade 1 on 1 ruble for dollar 😂
f-16 is a old junk from 70.