Two AIs made a 4x4 driving video for me
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2024
- What happens when AI does my job?
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @l2sfbc
Post questions as comments!
Follow me on Facebook:
/ robertpepperjourno
Support me on Patreon:
/ l2sfbc
Buy my books:
l2sfbc.com/where-to-buy/ - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
More info:
l2sfbc.com/has-chatgpt-made-journalists-redundant/
And another AI video test:
th-cam.com/video/ngzV-yslk_M/w-d-xo.html
No AI please. Never.
I don't need an artificial reality.
Hi Robert. Great video and I don’t think I have seen anyone tackle this subject in this way. I speak to leaders about generative AI and your video has me really thinking. There is a lot to unpack but the reason I watch your videos is your meticulous and transparent approach to each subject gives me confidence that what you say is something I should take seriously. If an AI video cannot replicate that then it’s pointless to me. At some point of course maybe I can’t tell the difference and at that point I will not trust any of it. Great video.
Thanks! Yes GenAI is a massive risk in my view. I have seen tutorials for creating 1000 TH-cam Shorts in 15 minutes; simply have ChatGPT generate 1000 phrases, dump to Excel, import into Canva, create a video template, generate 1000 videos, upload. Quantity not quality.
I tried an earlier version of ChatGPT some car questions and the results were variable, but the thing is, if you ask a question you don't know the answer to...how would you pick up on errors?
th-cam.com/video/ngzV-yslk_M/w-d-xo.html
The AI content is impressive, but ultimately unsatisfying.
Another point is that generic voiceovers are already used for crappy low-effort "voiced" videos, so generic AI voice gives a video a feel of low-effort low-quality video. So at present AI will probably be used for crap videos, but it will be gradually more polished crap. Maybe in ten years it will achieve its marketing promise, but right now it is pretty far from it.
Great video and thanks for producing this.
Ai is not the answer for everything but unfortunately it is with us and cannot stop it now.
Hopefully it can be used to help people but surely there will always be undesirable applications that are not in the best interests of human beings.
Hi Robert
I was genuinely curious to see how this went but found myself tuning out and not paying attention to the two videos.
Your real presentations have detail that a tend to require and hold careful attention that the ai ones lacked (a little like a course presenter reading notes vs one who actually knows their subject matter).
For folk producing 4x4 tourist videos and advertorials i imagine it'll work well but yours are better suited to yourself as presenter.
Maybe ai can help with some of the tedium of editing etc?
Yes that's the feedback I'm getting loud and clear and is what I want to do. Can't ignore AI but don't need to hand everything over.
I have used AI to assist in creating a script, however only after I’ve completed my own. I use it to see if I’ve forgotten to cover things, or perhaps compare and analyse other points of few I may not have thought about.
I don’t like AI generated content though. I immediately stop watching the content. Not only is it unreliable, Knowing how much time and effort goes into making content, I don’t think laziness should be rewarded. These issues aren’t obviously just restricted to content but education is a big thing to. I recently applied for RPL on a UOC that I was far over qualified for. I was told that my typed statement covering off on all the Performance Criteria, knowledge evidence held little weight these days because programs like chatGP had made such evidence hold little weight.
I didn’t actually know what chatGP was at the time. It meant I ended up doing more work to collect evidence that they would accept.
Very interesting video Robert. It highlights the need for detailed quality input. Your words came out reasonably well, however the video AI opted to use showed several poor examples of 4wding, eg one hand on steering wheel at 12 o’clock instead of two at quarter to three, the 4WDs were driving around turning and leaving 4 tracks and often across the side of dunes etc. AI will require careful input and reviewing before release.
Cheers Peter.
PS you are correct it is way past the time of saying it can’t happen. 😊
Absolutely, I would never have let that video though, poor practice. But, cost nothing and very easy to make...
Hi robert, your AI videos sounded more like an ad for a dune driving experience than a how to video on dune driving.
The first voice you chose would lilely have been perfect for an ad for a seedy nightclub, brothel etc, while the second was a cure for insomnia.
While it is easy to feed an AI knowledge, it is far harder to feed it the kind of wisdom and experience you and others have gained from years of 4WDing.
Each content creators personality comes through in their presenting style making two videos on the same topic coverong the same points slightly different, where the AI videos lacked this in the narration.
AI will no doubt be helpful for content creators, but IMO is better served helping you with the mundane background jobs rather than the main parts of your presentation...
Hi Robert! I hope you will stay real and continue to make real good videos. Both of your ai videos look and feel so sterile and even funny in places (if you dont have a sandflag pick something from your moms clothesline) 🙂
I hope the viewers have enough media competence to separate quality content like yours from fast and cheap ai shit.
Thanks!
If we are delegating our tasks to Ai, basically another skill we are offloading from ourselves, which is our critical thinking.
Yes
Too busy to watch, so I just asked AI to summarize the video.
The video explores using AI for video production, showcasing AI-generated clips on desert dune driving. The presenter raises four questions: the importance of human presence, the trade-off between quality and quantity, monetization challenges for creators, and the impact of AI on content quality. Viewer feedback is requested.
Very good!
I found both of the videos to come across like a car commercial, not a lesson presented by an experienced instructor. They were lifeless. Especially the second one. I know AI is going to and is being used but not as the primary presenter. It should be used as an aid, not the all to.
AI can have it's place and be helpful in doing research and helpful in refining it, however once the human factor is removed, it lacks authenticity and is not satisfying. For those that keep to their authenticity, I believe they will thrive as there will be a thirst for that in a sea of AI.
Even though AI is good and worth watching what it can do, really amazing stuff, I still prefer interacting with real humans
But how would you know? Maybe this entire video was by with AI and AI Robert was lying to you?
Please stay real. You're so much better than an AI avatar and I and trust what you say. AI makes its own rules. When TH-cam goes to AI, I will stop watching it. I want to watch real people doing real things.
They were horrible rubbish that a non 4wdriver would see and then think they know what they are doing. I watch your content because I am interested in the technical details and finer points of cars & 4wd.
By all means use AI for prompts, ideas and B roll, but for technical details that have to be correct in both words and images please leave it out.
Ai videos are exactly what's wrong with today's world.
Why?
@@L2SFBC In short, I'd say because it demonstrates utter contempt for human communication - for humanity, for that matter.
(For a perfectly developed discourse on the subject you may as well ask one of your robots ;-)
After all, it's mainly your idiosyncratic style and clarity that keeps us clicking back. The medium is most of the message..
I really don't want to hear those fake voices or watch that kind of mindless imagery ever again, whatever they're selling or telling.
And, anyway, I get the sense that you enjoy making these (real world) videos of yours as much as we enjoy watching them.
Which kind of shows I'm pretty sure you are human. But when your prosody starts laying its emphases in all the wrong places I'll know it's over ;-)
How does the A.I. deal with contradicting data, or just wrong data? How does the A.I. distinguish between Robert Pepper and Russel Coight? The information it presents could be ludicrous.
I THINK I prefer a real human, but time will tell, especially as the technology matures, and we become more accepting.
AI is trained on data, and the data *should* be only from credible sources. How is that done exactly? I don't know, but certainly ChatGPT 3 was trained on selected datasets, let's say books as opposed to web articles. Now I've written books and could well be those have been fed to an AI, without my knowledge and I get nothing from them but AI delivers my knowledge. This also presumes AI operators are ethical and do not simply throw junk in.
@@L2SFBC Thanks Robert, I guess we also have to presume that the data sets are kept up to date with developments, and that the operators are not only ethical but also have an effective protocol to reliably evaluate those datasets.
Also, is the AI delivering knowledge it has gained in say the same way as a student learns from reading a book, and then passes on that knowledge as a teacher, or is it out right plagiarising like certain vice chancellors? I would say the latter, as there are no citations nor credits, and it is essentially presenting copyrighted I.P.
The older ChatGPT was trained on specific data, but of course that couldn't last as there was a lag. ChatGPT 4 can search the web so it is up to date, but that means the data may not be accurate. I don't think accuracy is as important as profit or influence for many people - look at false media even before AI.
ChatGPT 4 does cite its sources...including me, I just posted on my Facebook about it with an example. However I gain no revenue from it.
How it learns is interesting. I first thought to write "no, it's different to humans, it doesn't understand what it replies with" but then I paused. What is understanding? That is a rabbit hole for sure. And many humans say things they do not understand. Does understanding even matter?
I don't know.
I found the first AI video nearly put me to sleep with it's calm & sleepy narrative. The second AI video was not as good content wise & the voice was robotic & also uninspiring. I'd rather watch the human with flaws. My buzz is the intellectual engagement I get form the presenter. I could listen to a playlist instead of live radio but I choose every time to listen to a interesting & passionate presenter. I wouldn't buy either of the AI video's as coffee.
What a dumb question!
What was?
@@L2SFBC Asking if your audience would prefer AI content?
It's nuanced - quality, quantity etc how much AI. Anyway, the verdict is very much in!
I don't like AI presenters, the voice just isn't right and lacks the right emotional inflection when it gets to the important bits.
There are content creators that just produce bulk content that is rubbish or just plain wrong, but its click bait on an industrial scale that gets views and somehow makes it worthwhile.
Both AI videos are dreary and generic sounding. They also communicate poorly because verbal emphases are random, rather than on what is important.
Anyway, if content creators use AI, I'll just unsubscribe and forget them.