@@CleetusGlobin Wait that's actually a good question.. I would think so since the sitter is still supposed to be watching the dog regardless of the setting?
Reminds me of a speeding ticket I got years ago. Spent like three months putting together my defense. Judge took like 2 minutes and cleared me over the police dept not responding to my discovery request within a reasonable timeline.
Love her smiling through the entire "hearing" like she knew the other woman was going to be making a fool out of herself in front of the entire court and cameras
@@thesuperdoge2476Judges can be bribed, sure, but they're not gonna whip out the money IN COURT. They're called "backroom deals" for a reason, ya know?
False, She agreed to take the job of being a pet sitter, its her responsibility to only take work from dogs she can handle watch and manage which is apart of the job and work responsibilities she accepted if she was not capable of stopping the dog doing damage (Which is highly unlikely only case here is eg an agressive cane corso) Then she had the resposnibility to not take the job which she took. If a dog does that there is a behavioral issue the pet sitter failed to account for or recognise.
@@Mineboost Your alt account did not work, make it less obvious less time GTMAN129. The comment was thoroughly debunked no disagreement involved just a debunking.
@@Mineboost I directly debunked not contradicted the implication. Its still the pet sitters responsibility to judge the behavior of the dogs they agree to sit if they do not have that skill they need to take responsibility of the consequences of a failure of their job role.
@JamesBurdon-gu5yu LMBO that isnt me, idiot!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 and please stage where on earth your argument came from...u seem to be having a different convo...
Even Byrd was speechless at how quick that went notice how long after she dismissed the case with "GOODBYE!" It took him to say parties are excused you may step out?
She left the dog unsupervised. That poor thing got high anxiety due to new environment and not being around anyone he knows and trust. Tall girl is 100% at fault for the mess he made.
Dogsitter. “Hmm I really need to go to the bathroom but would feel uncomfortable for the dog to be with me while I’m shitting. I will just leave him laying in the living room for 5 minutes, no big deal. 5 min later to the room is a mess.” Obviously it’s unrealistic to be with your pet or children 24/7 without a moment to yourself. You’re not endangering your pet under your care simply because you felt like using the toilet by yourself for a few minutes. The problem is there is simply no proof. Of course the dogsitter loses the case because for all anyone knows she could have tore her living room apart deliberately to get money for a home makeover blaming the dog. There would need to have been reported complaints or people to testify that this dogsitter tricks people. That is also a possibility. Though I’m biased to think the dog owner deliberately didn’t tell the dogsitter that she knew her dog behaves like this on a casual basis and purposely had the dogsitter care for the dog in her own home instead of the dog owners home. I believe the dog owner took advantage of the law and may have had a history of doing so and may continue to do so. That’s just my opinion. I can’t actually no what happens. The Judge simply carried out the law. I bet she personally feels the dogsitter got hoodwinked. But the law is the law. No proof. No history of repeated allegations and reports. No other witnesses or anyone else to testify. It’s what it is.
If she's watching the dog, it's also her fault if anything happens to her home while she's shitting. Did she have a choice to agree or disagree to a dogsittibg? She did. Could there be a possibility anything could happen? There could. Whatever happened is unfortunate but is NOT on the owner. Because it goes "Can you watch over my animal while I completely don't watch what it does and it can do anything?" "Yes" So, as I said, unfortunate, not on the girl who's things got damaged,not on the dog owner as well. @@user-ni7td7lm1r
@@user-ni7td7lm1r you can just ask the accused. She might say "my dog sometimes destroys things when left unchecked, but that doesn't mean..." And then you would have evidence.
There was another one where a girl sued her ex roommate b/c her new apartment cost more and wanted her to pay the difference. Judge Judy Dismissed it immediately
@@KraylebStudios The Plaintiff thought it was her Roommates business to help her pay for her new Apartment that cost more. Which was ridiculous because she moved out on her own which Judge Judy dismissed it
THANK YOOOOUUUUU!! I don’t understand how everyone is agreeing that it’s 100% the sitters fault. People hate accountability these days. She knew her damn dog tears property. I know damn well it has done it before and she knows as well but failed to communicate that behavior to her.
@@CosmicBeing538 We own a miniature dachshund who was born blind and deaf. The damn thing hunts our cats. The little psycho has caught our cats. Best believe we would tell that to a sitter.
Honestly she was still a puppy- I asked her to watch my dog at my apartment but she insisted she take it to hers- and also didn’t want her cage (that the dog used every night) because she “felt bad” but then she decided leaving my dog alone with no cage- while her roommates were home in the house and left the dog locked in a room and thought that was a good idea. I had my own proof but as you can see I didn’t get a chance to stand up for her. Sadly my lab passed away at 5 but this will always be a silly story to remember her by and she luckily wasn’t traumatized by people after this. She did continue to eat random things if left unattended for too long though. Still miss her!
@crispycruiser4654 oh, no doubt about that. But when I replied to them, there was another comment that actually included the word "theory", and it was right above or below the one they replied to. I don't see it anymore though
Oh my god, I remember that case! She had to read out a list of what had been in the purse and she put a fake item on the list and caught him out. The look on his face when he realised what he had done was great.
True. If you were babysitting a kid and they managed to cause you, your pet or your belongings harm despite your attempts to coral them, then the parent should have to take some responsibility for that kid. This woman’s dog destroyed her shit and clearly wasn’t properly trained. She brings up the point that she is responsible for having trained the dog to not be destructive, or at the very least she should take responsibility for the animal and the damage caused
Dogs sometimes act completely different when they’re in a new environment and are stressed. That doesn’t mean it was never trained. It means it was anxious.
@table2.0 We don't know the circumstances of this. Nothing (no dog, no baby) will behave perfectly all the time. Lauren couldn't have known for sure that her dog wouldn't destroy some stuff, especially when left alone for who knows how long.
Actually I think she's got a fair point. If you have a dog for example that has behavioral issues and it attacks your sitter because you didn't warn them that they are nervous, then you would be held responsibly for injuries and/or death and the dog would be put down. My dog is destructive and has serious stranger danger issues and I would never leave her alone with someone that she wasn't very comfortable with already
This is as hilarious as the one where one airhead sued another woman that she threw out of their shared place. When the airhead couldn't afford the place on her own and had to move herself, she wanted the woman to pay her moving costs. JJ looked at her like she was...an airhead.
Part of a good judges job is bringing the two party's to some sort of understanding. Not immediately dismissing one persons argument, however stupid it is.
I need a real Layers Reaction to this!!! I feel it was definitely cut short. I think that even if you accepted a dog sitting job, there are reasons that you wouldnt be liable for certain damages, and someone else would be..... and really, what if dog sitting girl wasn't informed that the dog had very serious behavioral issues when "put in stressful situations", like going to a new house with a new person. How could she have denied the job if she didnt know? Id be pretty upset, too, if a person who I was supposed to be trusting, gave me their pet to pet sit and didnt inform me of their needs. Every animal is different, right? Boom. You feed the dog the normal brand of dog food that you feed all the dogs, and this dog dies. Owner says "you shpuld have known!! They were allergic to that dog food!!" But.... they didnt tell you. How could you have fking known? Are you liable for that dead dog now? Or your walking the dog on a leash, on a side walk, safely, and a random drunk driver spins out, drives ONTO the sidewalk... hits and kills the dog......... are you liable for that, too? Now, those examples are all damage to the pet owners property.... but look at it the other way around, too. Person takes dog to pet sit. Owner leaves. Dog goes crazy, causes serious damage to persons home...... but they weren't informed that this dog would have behavioral issues as such, which would not be deemed normal for dog behavior... meaning, it would have been the dog owners responsibility to make sure the pet owner knew of this (like with the allergic reaction to the dog food), and thus.... would it not then be the pet owner at fault? Down to discuss.
The dog was under her watch, it was her responsibility as she was dogsitting, clearly she wasnt paying attention or the dog wouldnt have ruined so much. Do you honestly think she just watched as the dog went nuts and she stood by doing nothing as it wrecked her things? Come on. She left the dog alone, 100%.
As others have said, dogs can get very anxious when not with their owners in their own home. What if the dog owner never was away from her dog before, and didnt know it would react this way? That's why Judy asked , "does your dog speak to you?"
Idk why everyone is acting like she’s being unreasonable. If your dog destroys someone’s house, you should pay for the damages. She agreed to babysit a dog she believed was well behaved and the owner shouldn’t be against making up for it.
It might be the moral thing to do, but it's not the legal thing to do. We might be decent people and offer to pay for the damage, but it's not always a legal responsibility.
@@emhoj97 if someone’s kid broke or ruined something, even with your best efforts to watch over and look after them, unless it was small stuff or a genuine accident that scared the kid and didn’t upset you, then you’d want some kind of responsibility put on the person who is overall responsible for the child. Hell, if we go even further, it’s the defendant’s job to put her dog with someone who she knows will do good- we don’t know if she paid the plaintiff to do it or how bad the damage was that she’s taking the time and money to sue her friend in court over it. It must have been bad if she couldn’t agree anything without legal action, and whatever legal counsel she got before making her case at all fucked her over by convincing her she has a case at all if there is zero legal precedent for it
That's really nice of you but it not required. An the sitter most certainly can't sue. The dog was under the sitter supervision, making them responsible for any damages.
Am i the only one thinking she should pay for the damage? 👀 my dog once damaged the dog sitter's door and i automatically suggested that I'll pay for the damage 🙊 it's my dog and she should behave better, of course it's my responsibility..
This would be like dropping off a kid to be babysat, having the kid get into something and spill it all over your carpet and then suing the parents for the damages.
Accountability and honor has completely gone out the window. If my dog destroyed the pet sitters house, I would at least pay for 50% of the damages. This shouldn’t have even gotten all the way to small claims court. This reminds me of the teenagers who broke my windshield with a baseball and their parents completely enabled their behavior and told me to go pound sand over the $300 in damages. I should have called the police.
In italy, it is required by law to have insurance for the damage or injuries that a dog may cause to both private and communal property as well as people. I guess it's not the same in North America.
My grandpa used to watch this every day, I remember going to my grandma's house and always seeing him in the same spot with his judge Judy pillow next to him and his chair legs up watching his show happily. He never really left the house or got up from his spot but I remember when I came over and he was up I loved to talk to him he always called me super brat and my mom brat. It's been around 2 years I think but it still hurts R.I.P Cory Jones I love you lots and miss you and so do grandma and mom ❤
@@KraylebStudios svoboda is freedom. In this case freedom to do sue anyone on any reasons no matter how stupid. Outcome negative, case dismissed due to accusations being on negligent grounds
@@RednocNivert lol no it's not the dog sitters responsibility to control someone else's dog. It's the dog owners responsibility to make sure the dog won't tear up furniture
…has anyone here interacted with pets that aren’t their own? It’s at the very least it’s courteous to make whoever is looking after your pet aware of issues like this. If the dog bit her, would they still be this flippant? What if they’re a frequent floor wetter, or what if they throw up in certain circumstances? What if the dog needs certain medication the owner doesn’t explain or provide? It feels a lot less clear cut than “oh dogs do that”. She has a point that not all dogs do that, and she should have at least been informed of behavioral issues if they were going to result in destruction of property. Judge Judy was wildly unprofessional. She wasn’t willing to hear out the case at all, and had certain notions going in. The defendant didn’t even have to say anything. There’s a reason she’s a TV judge, this would have raised so many issues if this was a legitimate court.
The disappointment in her face, it was like a cigarette watching her think she actually could disagree until she realized her opinion means nothing.. Pure gold!
The defendant wins by doing absolutely nothing.
“When the only winning move is not to plaaaaaay!!!”
Gbye
Luigi
@@Dr_mafario genius
“Never interrupt an enemy when they are making a mistake”
"My popcorn was in microwave longer than this case"
Booting up my PC took longer than this case.
Posting a reply to this comment took longer than this case.
an unskippable ad was longer than this case
@@SirAspenMoon_TheGoodestGoodBoy You mean this case, not the video- Oh wait a minute. Oh. XD
Blinking took longer than this case
There's an easy alternative to this counter.
"Who was watching the dog?"
"Me, Your Honor, but-"
"Case closed, goodbye."
Or have the dog be in court instead of the owner. Then you'll see how ridiculous it really is.
@@ajamerlan but the dog would damage the court room so we cannot it does that
Would you think the sitter would have to pay damages if the dog were in the owner's house when this happened?
@@CleetusGlobin Wait that's actually a good question.. I would think so since the sitter is still supposed to be watching the dog regardless of the setting?
@@ajamerlanthat's some Ace Attorney kinda shit.
The defendant had all that paperwork - she probably rehearsed her answers and did even get to say a word
Reminds me of a speeding ticket I got years ago. Spent like three months putting together my defense. Judge took like 2 minutes and cleared me over the police dept not responding to my discovery request within a reasonable timeline.
How it feels when you have social anxiety
‘The dog ate my paperwork’
Love her smiling through the entire "hearing" like she knew the other woman was going to be making a fool out of herself in front of the entire court and cameras
@maverickmurphy why do you think pet owners shouldn't be responsible for the things their poorly-trained animals do?
Imagine being flown out here just the stand in the court room for 30 seconds 😅
😂😂she’s already a mad girl, so, how much farther can she get?😂😂
😂
Hopefully she got a good tour of the city before having to head home. 😂
Free trip and she splits 6k with the defendent.
😂😂😂
Don't you love it when people say "I disagree with you" to a judge like they think their opinion matters
Acting like judges cant be bought out with money
@@thesuperdoge2476Judges can be bribed, sure, but they're not gonna whip out the money IN COURT. They're called "backroom deals" for a reason, ya know?
@@thesuperdoge2476 That literally has nothing to do with their comment?
@@markusnixon3156 I think hes talking about the girl
Honestly better than lashing out and getting a fine herself, I bet that's more common than we think.
"Case dismissed, bring in the dancing lobsters"
That's Judge *Trudy* this is Judge *Judy* Silly 🤭
@@white.rabbit1871 I'm well aware of who this is. Doesn't mean we can't have no dancing lobsters
Cheers dude, I just sprayed my wall with coffee reading your comment. 10/10, well done mate. 🙇♂️
🦞🦞🦞
Bruh I feel old af just knowing this reference
So in short, she wasn't watching the dog that she was supposed to be pet sitting and thought that was the owner's fault. Absolute clown.
My thoughts exactly!
‘in short’ lol it’s already short enough
Exactly!
@@bigmansentai Quiet down. Stop nitpicking at words.
@@crispycruiser4654 Bet you're fun at parties. We're all just having a snicker at a funny JJ case, chill out.
You can have a calm dog and once it leaves it's comfort zone it can become irate, whiney, clingy, destructive, and sometimes even hostile.
False, She agreed to take the job of being a pet sitter, its her responsibility to only take work from dogs she can handle watch and manage which is apart of the job and work responsibilities she accepted if she was not capable of stopping the dog doing damage (Which is highly unlikely only case here is eg an agressive cane corso) Then she had the resposnibility to not take the job which she took. If a dog does that there is a behavioral issue the pet sitter failed to account for or recognise.
@@JamesBurdon-gu5yuHow do you manage to disagree with someone without contradicting a single thing they said
@@Mineboost Your alt account did not work, make it less obvious less time GTMAN129. The comment was thoroughly debunked no disagreement involved just a debunking.
@@Mineboost I directly debunked not contradicted the implication. Its still the pet sitters responsibility to judge the behavior of the dogs they agree to sit if they do not have that skill they need to take responsibility of the consequences of a failure of their job role.
@JamesBurdon-gu5yu LMBO that isnt me, idiot!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 and please stage where on earth your argument came from...u seem to be having a different convo...
i love that lady in the background goin “dude wtf” when the plaintiff explains her theory
0:26
Good eye 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That face😂😂😂
Hahahah I went back to see lol
@@jeremeytheking it took about five or six times clicking it and figuring out which one it was. I love the reaction.
There was one faster where a guy deadass admitted to stealing a girl’s wallet 20 seconds into the case.
That's a popular clip but it's misleading. I actually found the full video of the case and it goes on for a few minutes before she dismisses it.
I actually thought that’s what this was. That one was a little longer of a video but still one of the fastest.
Yeahhh the dumb and dumber case 😂😂
*This was waaaay faster than that case*
@@ajchovanec link?
If it's the dog's fault, why not sue the dog?
Because the dog is crazy 🤣
@@Seeta_sa_gauta Insanity plea
Because the dog would somehow end up winning the case.
A pet is an animal with a guardian. Sue the guardian
@@Ultramega39 imagine they brought the dog the case would have been faster
“I disagree with your decision.”
LADY, YOU ARE IN /HER/ COURTROOM.
What's with the forward slashes next to the word her?
@@TheRealPixeled Emphasis, I also forgot how to bold the text in a TH-cam video
@@TieflingKumasi
* like this without the spaces *
@@skyden4637 Oh yeah, that’s right
Not hers owned by someone else
the other girls face is HILARIOUS! she’s calling all her friends immediately!!
who calls anymore??? I'm sure it was on Facebook though
@@Gimogimo3229who uses facebook anymore
@@Gimogimo3229 What? Most people still do. I'm quite young and we all do.
@@Gimogimo3229Nobody uses Facebook, grampa
@Gimogimo3229 you make calling sound like an old people only thing but then start talking about facebook...
“Judge Judy will continue in a moment” not only is there nothing to continue but this case didn’t even last a whole moment 💀💀💀
I think they went to another case.
"i disagree with you-"
"goodbye 😃✋"
iconic, the other girl looked so happy too
Judge Judy said F*** this I’m going to lunch 💀😂
ITS SUSHI DAY!
Lol that’s facts though. She always tells them to hurry up so she could have lunch 😂😂😂😂
@@jashuamorales_she doesn't have all day
@@declangaming24 I know lol the way she does it it’s funny 😂😂😂
@@jashuamorales_ judge judy is like a grandmother you want but you don't like it when she's angry be naughty she shouts "DONT SPEAK "
Even Byrd was speechless at how quick that went notice how long after she dismissed the case with "GOODBYE!" It took him to say parties are excused you may step out?
She left the dog unsupervised. That poor thing got high anxiety due to new environment and not being around anyone he knows and trust. Tall girl is 100% at fault for the mess he made.
Dogsitter. “Hmm I really need to go to the bathroom but would feel uncomfortable for the dog to be with me while I’m shitting. I will just leave him laying in the living room for 5 minutes, no big deal. 5 min later to the room is a mess.” Obviously it’s unrealistic to be with your pet or children 24/7 without a moment to yourself. You’re not endangering your pet under your care simply because you felt like using the toilet by yourself for a few minutes.
The problem is there is simply no proof. Of course the dogsitter loses the case because for all anyone knows she could have tore her living room apart deliberately to get money for a home makeover blaming the dog. There would need to have been reported complaints or people to testify that this dogsitter tricks people. That is also a possibility.
Though I’m biased to think the dog owner deliberately didn’t tell the dogsitter that she knew her dog behaves like this on a casual basis and purposely had the dogsitter care for the dog in her own home instead of the dog owners home. I believe the dog owner took advantage of the law and may have had a history of doing so and may continue to do so. That’s just my opinion. I can’t actually no what happens. The Judge simply carried out the law. I bet she personally feels the dogsitter got hoodwinked. But the law is the law. No proof. No history of repeated allegations and reports. No other witnesses or anyone else to testify. It’s what it is.
@user-ni7td7lm1r 😴
If she's watching the dog, it's also her fault if anything happens to her home while she's shitting. Did she have a choice to agree or disagree to a dogsittibg? She did. Could there be a possibility anything could happen? There could.
Whatever happened is unfortunate but is NOT on the owner. Because it goes
"Can you watch over my animal while I completely don't watch what it does and it can do anything?"
"Yes"
So, as I said, unfortunate, not on the girl who's things got damaged,not on the dog owner as well. @@user-ni7td7lm1r
@@user-ni7td7lm1rProps to everyone who actually reads this.
@@user-ni7td7lm1r you can just ask the accused. She might say "my dog sometimes destroys things when left unchecked, but that doesn't mean..." And then you would have evidence.
If she was sitting my dog she would file for psychological abuse and distress.
If she were sitting for my dog, I'd be suing her for not watching my dog.
If I were sitting your dog and it tore my place up. You'd come back to a dead dog. 😮
Love the smile on the defendant's face. She knew she won before she ever stepped foot in the room.
There was another one where a girl sued her ex roommate b/c her new apartment cost more and wanted her to pay the difference. Judge Judy Dismissed it immediately
Then she cries and sounds like Michael Jackson lmao, you just unlocked a memory!
i think i've seen that one, too 😭
@@parkerbeard6170 why was it thr room-mates business??
@@KraylebStudios The Plaintiff thought it was her Roommates business to help her pay for her new Apartment that cost more. Which was ridiculous because she moved out on her own which Judge Judy dismissed it
@@parkerbeard6170how delusional do you have to be to think your roommate needs to pay rent for a place they don't live in it's not like child support
Speaking as someone who works in pet care, there is frequently pertinent information concerning the animal's personality that should be communicated.
THANK YOOOOUUUUU!! I don’t understand how everyone is agreeing that it’s 100% the sitters fault. People hate accountability these days. She knew her damn dog tears property. I know damn well it has done it before and she knows as well but failed to communicate that behavior to her.
@@CosmicBeing538 We own a miniature dachshund who was born blind and deaf. The damn thing hunts our cats. The little psycho has caught our cats. Best believe we would tell that to a sitter.
I feel like it would also just be common courtesy to pay to cover things that YOUR dog destroyed.
@@ChocolateRouge Yeah I was disappointed with Judy on this one. That was really ignorant to make that girl look stupid like that.
Honestly she was still a puppy- I asked her to watch my dog at my apartment but she insisted she take it to hers- and also didn’t want her cage (that the dog used every night) because she “felt bad” but then she decided leaving my dog alone with no cage- while her roommates were home in the house and left the dog locked in a room and thought that was a good idea. I had my own proof but as you can see I didn’t get a chance to stand up for her. Sadly my lab passed away at 5 but this will always be a silly story to remember her by and she luckily wasn’t traumatized by people after this. She did continue to eat random things if left unattended for too long though. Still miss her!
Everyone in this room is enjoying the hell out of this, even judy is smiling
Her face when Judge Judy said goodbye: 👁️👄👁️
And then picked up her things while being embarassed LMFAO
For real her face factory reset 😭 but also why is the "damage" just ripped paper?
i agree with the plaintiff, the defendant should’ve had a conversation with her dog and english and told them not to destroy the plaintiffs property.
frr
The way she wave her hand. So funny 😂😂😂
“Um I disagree with your….”
“Goodbye!”
👁️👁️
👄
😂😂
People are so goddamn brainless.
With an Australian accent lol
That sarcastic wave she does makes it even better lmao
[👁️]-[👁️]
. 👃
. 👄
Didn't realize we were doing Judge Judy speedruns here...
0:12 Actually starts here
dude it's a 50 second video
@@cultofmel But doesn't officially start until 0:12
dog
dog
Dog 🐶
Whst makes this even more fair is the "Goodbye!!" 😂😎
Never argue with a Judge, no matter who's right or who's wrong
That's the moral of the story
Her "Theory" was stupid what are you talking about??
@@Lex_Superior you replied to the wrong comment
Why... Isn't that why there are juries?
@@pwnthrower Don't think so, just think Lex is one of those people who has to pick an argument with anyone and everyone for no reason.
@crispycruiser4654 oh, no doubt about that. But when I replied to them, there was another comment that actually included the word "theory", and it was right above or below the one they replied to. I don't see it anymore though
0:41 the fucking way she says "GOODBYE" and then waves KILLS me
0:42 that ladys reaction in the background 😂
Imagine suing someone and having everything planned out just to be told you lost almost instantly 🤣
The defendant didn’t even need to speak 😂
LMFAO 😭😭
My favorite short case was the two guys getting sued for stealing a woman's purse and one of the guys said that an item wasn't in the purse
Oh my god, I remember that case! She had to read out a list of what had been in the purse and she put a fake item on the list and caught him out. The look on his face when he realised what he had done was great.
Ha! I was thinking about that one, too. It was her earbuds or something.
@@featherlightfox1292 oh wow so she was big brain and outsmarted him 😂😂
the face of the woman at the right literally identifies me 0:25
“Uhh i disagree with your-“
“BYEE!” she’s iconic
court speedrun any%
XD
The background music coming in during the wave took me out LOL
I disagree with Judy here. If you haven’t house trained your dog, you shouldn’t be putting it in someone else’s house.
True. If you were babysitting a kid and they managed to cause you, your pet or your belongings harm despite your attempts to coral them, then the parent should have to take some responsibility for that kid.
This woman’s dog destroyed her shit and clearly wasn’t properly trained. She brings up the point that she is responsible for having trained the dog to not be destructive, or at the very least she should take responsibility for the animal and the damage caused
"Do you have a dog?" "Yes, but-" "Case dismissed. Goodbye!"
The plaintiff had no way of proving which dog did it and lost instantly.
Dogs sometimes act completely different when they’re in a new environment and are stressed. That doesn’t mean it was never trained. It means it was anxious.
Except she was supposed to be watching the dog and if the dog was able to destroy that much she obviously wasn't watching the dog lol
@table2.0 We don't know the circumstances of this. Nothing (no dog, no baby) will behave perfectly all the time. Lauren couldn't have known for sure that her dog wouldn't destroy some stuff, especially when left alone for who knows how long.
0:25 the girl's face in the back 😂😂
The one on the right? She's staring her down like she owes her money.
She’s like: “Bro what?”
Actually I think she's got a fair point. If you have a dog for example that has behavioral issues and it attacks your sitter because you didn't warn them that they are nervous, then you would be held responsibly for injuries and/or death and the dog would be put down. My dog is destructive and has serious stranger danger issues and I would never leave her alone with someone that she wasn't very comfortable with already
This is as hilarious as the one where one airhead sued another woman that she threw out of their shared place. When the airhead couldn't afford the place on her own and had to move herself, she wanted the woman to pay her moving costs. JJ looked at her like she was...an airhead.
Wait, what
I actually think that the defendant is liable for her dog's damages. If she was a decent person she would offer to pay for the damages.
She’s supposed to watch the dog she’s supposed to be pet sitting 😂 the owner isnt responsible for that
The 2nd sentence is correct, but that doesn’t make them liable.
@@RBSmadathe second sentence isnt even correct, because, if she did her damn job of watching the dog, none of this would have happened to begin with
Why even accept this case if you aren’t even gonna see it through?
THE DIFFERENCE IN THE GIRLS FACES I CANT😂😂😂
defendant didn't even have to talk 💀
Man, now if only my parents' divorce proceedings could be this efficient...
Part of a good judges job is bringing the two party's to some sort of understanding. Not immediately dismissing one persons argument, however stupid it is.
I need a real Layers Reaction to this!!! I feel it was definitely cut short. I think that even if you accepted a dog sitting job, there are reasons that you wouldnt be liable for certain damages, and someone else would be.....
and really, what if dog sitting girl wasn't informed that the dog had very serious behavioral issues when "put in stressful situations", like going to a new house with a new person. How could she have denied the job if she didnt know?
Id be pretty upset, too, if a person who I was supposed to be trusting, gave me their pet to pet sit and didnt inform me of their needs. Every animal is different, right?
Boom. You feed the dog the normal brand of dog food that you feed all the dogs, and this dog dies. Owner says "you shpuld have known!! They were allergic to that dog food!!" But.... they didnt tell you. How could you have fking known? Are you liable for that dead dog now?
Or your walking the dog on a leash, on a side walk, safely, and a random drunk driver spins out, drives ONTO the sidewalk... hits and kills the dog......... are you liable for that, too?
Now, those examples are all damage to the pet owners property.... but look at it the other way around, too.
Person takes dog to pet sit. Owner leaves. Dog goes crazy, causes serious damage to persons home...... but they weren't informed that this dog would have behavioral issues as such, which would not be deemed normal for dog behavior... meaning, it would have been the dog owners responsibility to make sure the pet owner knew of this (like with the allergic reaction to the dog food), and thus.... would it not then be the pet owner at fault?
Down to discuss.
The dog was under her watch, it was her responsibility as she was dogsitting, clearly she wasnt paying attention or the dog wouldnt have ruined so much. Do you honestly think she just watched as the dog went nuts and she stood by doing nothing as it wrecked her things? Come on. She left the dog alone, 100%.
As others have said, dogs can get very anxious when not with their owners in their own home.
What if the dog owner never was away from her dog before, and didnt know it would react this way?
That's why Judy asked , "does your dog speak to you?"
Other girl ain’t even need to say nuthin 💀💀💀
"Bye bye! *waves aggressively* " ATE.
"alright I started the timer for the popcorn and wait wtf it's over"
JJ is wrong here.
Idk why everyone is acting like she’s being unreasonable. If your dog destroys someone’s house, you should pay for the damages. She agreed to babysit a dog she believed was well behaved and the owner shouldn’t be against making up for it.
yes exactly!! If someone babysat my cat and my cat knocked over a vase id pay for it. Wtf is this judge on about?
It might be the moral thing to do, but it's not the legal thing to do. We might be decent people and offer to pay for the damage, but it's not always a legal responsibility.
@@emhoj97 if someone’s kid broke or ruined something, even with your best efforts to watch over and look after them, unless it was small stuff or a genuine accident that scared the kid and didn’t upset you, then you’d want some kind of responsibility put on the person who is overall responsible for the child.
Hell, if we go even further, it’s the defendant’s job to put her dog with someone who she knows will do good- we don’t know if she paid the plaintiff to do it or how bad the damage was that she’s taking the time and money to sue her friend in court over it. It must have been bad if she couldn’t agree anything without legal action, and whatever legal counsel she got before making her case at all fucked her over by convincing her she has a case at all if there is zero legal precedent for it
Imagine driving 5 hours for a 10 second case…
I love how you can hear someone laughing at the end of the video
As the dog owner I would’ve offered to pay for the damages that my dog made.
Why? She left the dog in her custody. She was in charge of the dog.
@@Random-xw1fg
Exactly.
@@Random-xw1fgThere’s also, as far as we see, no proof which dog did the damage.
Youre an i d i o t
That's really nice of you but it not required. An the sitter most certainly can't sue. The dog was under the sitter supervision, making them responsible for any damages.
Am i the only one thinking she should pay for the damage? 👀 my dog once damaged the dog sitter's door and i automatically suggested that I'll pay for the damage 🙊 it's my dog and she should behave better, of course it's my responsibility..
"should" is debatable, we would need to know more about the situation. Legally required? Absolutely not. That's all that matters in this case
THE OTHER ONE DIDNT EVEN HAVE TO SPEAK LMAOOOO
Loved judge Judy actually waving to the plaintiff good bye
the prosecution actually thought she was reasonable... "i disagree with your decision."
The way the girl who owned the dog just smiled and didnt even say a WORD is just so graitfying to see
Under what theory was a trick question. It always going to be based on facts and evidence.
She got speechless after the GOODBYE 😂😂
I didn't know judges can just assume on what happens in a case.
Looked like a hissy-fit was imminent at the end there 😂
Further damage between the girls!
This would be like dropping off a kid to be babysat, having the kid get into something and spill it all over your carpet and then suing the parents for the damages.
They flew those people out there for that 😂
It's located in California, and these people seem like they're from California as well. Most likely an effortless attempt to get on TV
Your honor my dog ate my homework
Why be extra rude? Ive seen judges extend time for the criminal being rude but judges can be rude? F them
Accountability and honor has completely gone out the window. If my dog destroyed the pet sitters house, I would at least pay for 50% of the damages. This shouldn’t have even gotten all the way to small claims court. This reminds me of the teenagers who broke my windshield with a baseball and their parents completely enabled their behavior and told me to go pound sand over the $300 in damages. I should have called the police.
I agree and she should have ATLEAST tried to stop the dog
Yes!
Nah I feel bad for her, she was humiliated.
In italy, it is required by law to have insurance for the damage or injuries that a dog may cause to both private and communal property as well as people. I guess it's not the same in North America.
My grandpa used to watch this every day, I remember going to my grandma's house and always seeing him in the same spot with his judge Judy pillow next to him and his chair legs up watching his show happily. He never really left the house or got up from his spot but I remember when I came over and he was up I loved to talk to him he always called me super brat and my mom brat. It's been around 2 years I think but it still hurts R.I.P Cory Jones I love you lots and miss you and so do grandma and mom ❤
the goodbye did it for me 😭😂
She literal speed runned the court case😂
Some one edit the dream Minecraft speed run music into this😂😂
“Uh I disagree with you here”
Can you even disagree with a judge in court of law
Appaŕntly not!
This has to be so embarrassing 😭
Her last name being svoboda meaning freedom in Russian is just ironic
@@javidmirza4584 what do thr names have to do with anything
@@KraylebStudios svoboda is freedom. In this case freedom to do sue anyone on any reasons no matter how stupid. Outcome negative, case dismissed due to accusations being on negligent grounds
I'm sorry but the girl was right. If the owner of the dog knows that the dog can do this then they should warn the pet sitter
XD JUST SAYS BYE AND WAVES 😭😭
So if her dog kills someone it doesnt matter?
no but fr. i swear if this was a kid she was babysitting she'd be favored.
It would matter, it'd be on the shoulders of the person watching the dog to make sure that didn't happen.
@@RednocNivert lol no it's not the dog sitters responsibility to control someone else's dog. It's the dog owners responsibility to make sure the dog won't tear up furniture
Judge Judy was smiling, too!
I hate how rude Judy is.
cry about it. nobody’s gonna pat you on the back and tutor you for being a dumbass
help the sass into the “goodbye 😘”
That goodbye was so disrespectful
And this is why Judge Judy isn't a real Judge.
But she is
Then She Should Act Like It.
She really is a real judge. Small claims court, and highest paid judge in the country
…has anyone here interacted with pets that aren’t their own? It’s at the very least it’s courteous to make whoever is looking after your pet aware of issues like this.
If the dog bit her, would they still be this flippant? What if they’re a frequent floor wetter, or what if they throw up in certain circumstances? What if the dog needs certain medication the owner doesn’t explain or provide? It feels a lot less clear cut than “oh dogs do that”. She has a point that not all dogs do that, and she should have at least been informed of behavioral issues if they were going to result in destruction of property.
Judge Judy was wildly unprofessional. She wasn’t willing to hear out the case at all, and had certain notions going in. The defendant didn’t even have to say anything. There’s a reason she’s a TV judge, this would have raised so many issues if this was a legitimate court.
The way she said bye in this will never get old 😂
She should've sued the dog.
I like the defendant literally made two facial expressions and won 💀
“I disagree with you-“
THE JUDGE? YOU DISAGREE WITH THE JUDGE?
Judges are people too and can be wrong. Like Judy is in this case.
@@orlagh277and how could she (the dog sitter) know what the dog does? Does she speak dog.
@@Avocadobreezee5142 ok so if someone owns a dog and it kills someone it doesnt matter right because she doesnt speak dog.
@@xeox4280murder and damage is very different and if I saw that on the news I wouldn’t care that much
@@Avocadobreezee5142 no
You know it’s bad when the guests there are laughing😭🙏
Next up: two six-year-olds appearing in court cause one stole a lollipop from the other 🤣
5 years without parole
The disappointment in her face, it was like a cigarette watching her think she actually could disagree until she realized her opinion means nothing.. Pure gold!
“GOODBYE! 😄 👋👋👋” so real