Micsig Oscilloscope (Part 2) Carry Bag Bigger on The Inside

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @billyyoder8171
    @billyyoder8171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Atom. Good job again. Have a blessed and safe week to you and your family.

  • @VashthStampeede
    @VashthStampeede 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good array of accessories to go into your new bag. Nice vid.

  • @automaxwellenvideo6311
    @automaxwellenvideo6311 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hola , es sorprendente como caben todos los instrumentos excelente , gracias .

    • @atomsworkshop195
      @atomsworkshop195  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Automaxwell en video, your welcome, and thank you. Yea, I was very surprised how much actually fit in there. It seems to be a good carry bag, so far. Automaxwell en video, tu bienvenida, y gracias. Sí, me sorprendió mucho lo que encajaba ahí. Parece ser una buena bolsa de carga, hasta ahora.

  • @geologic740
    @geologic740 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's a good setup. I don't have any accessories yet, like amp clamps, but it's interesting that all your equipment fits in that bag. I got a hard case for mine and it seems like I can't fit half your setup in it. Lol
    On the Micsig test leads, I couldn't find any. Perhaps it's a search engine filtering issue.

    • @atomsworkshop195
      @atomsworkshop195  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey there Geo Logic. Thanks. When I got the new SATO1004, I got the hard case for it. I really like the hard case. Unfortunately, I can’t fit all my accessories in it. I have a video showing the hard case. In it, you can see I have my Pico leads, 2 attenuators, charging cables, some back probes, and maybe one or two more things in it. My amp clamps and everything else, I still keep in the soft carry bag.
      PS, I bought the Pico leads because I think the Micsig leads are just too short for automotive use. Also, I like how the Pico leads are color coded to match each channel on the scope. Also, the Pico leads are just really good leads, and are supposed to be really good at keeping out interference.

  • @Natalebrown
    @Natalebrown 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome

    • @atomsworkshop195
      @atomsworkshop195  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Ronald Brown. Good to hear from you

  • @justme3461
    @justme3461 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi atom
    I am confusing between the picoscope and micsig
    What's your advice for me
    I would appreciate your feedback

    • @atomsworkshop195
      @atomsworkshop195  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello Just Me, and welcome to the channel. Well, I think the first thing to consider is do you want a stand alone scope tablet, or a scope that needs to be hooked up to a laptop or cpu. That is definitely one of the advantages of the Micsig oscilloscope. You don’t have to worry about making sure you have a charged working laptop. And it is definitely faster to get up and running. I do a lot of mobile diagnostics, so I wanted a stand alone tablet scope. The battery in the Micsig is really good, and can last throughout the day (if you’re not running it non stop). Both the Micsig & Pico are really great scopes, I’m sure you will be happy with either one. Of course you have to think of price as well. When I bought my Micsig ATO1104 automotive scope, I paid about $800 from Amazon. At that time, I believe I would have had to pay more than twice that for the Pico automotive scope. Now with the Pico, they have the waveform library that you get access to (once you have their scope). This can be very valuable. Definitely very useful. You get to see known good and bad waveforms for a number of vehicles. I believe the Pico offers some options for automotive use that the Micsig doesn’t. They can pack more in their since it’s going through your laptop. With that said, the Micsig ATO1104 is more than capable for automotive use. It comes with a lot of automotive presets, so if you are new to scoping, it can help you set up for the best waveforms. It also has presets for different accessories such as amp clamps, secondary probes, and pressure probes. The Pico does as well. In fact the Pico has more settings for this. It’s really up to you my friend. All I can say is, I have been using the Micsig ATO1104 for over a year now, and have been very happy with it. The Micsig has a very nice and easy to learn interface. Now if I had the extra money, would I buy a Pico automotive scope? Absolutely, if for no other reason than, I like collecting diagnostic equipment. I am sure there are times where the Pico might be better for the job, and times where the Micsig will be better. From experience with the Micsig, I’m sure you’ll be happy with either one. I would just recommend, that whichever you get, if you’re getting it for automotive use, make sure you get a 4 channel. If you get a Micsig, make sure you get one that comes with a battery. I would recommend the ATO1104 for automotive use. With that said, I know there are some guys using the Micsig T1000 series for automotive and seem to be ok. If you go that route, later you can always upgrade the firmware to the automotive setup and get all the presets and everything else that’s different for the automotive firmware. I hope this helps. I’m sure I am leaving out plenty, I just woke up, and am writing this over my morning cup of coffee, lol. Feel free to ask any more questions. That is why I made this channel. Thanks again for stopping by Just Me.

  • @stevenjames7073
    @stevenjames7073 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does that scope have digital single like a regular volts meter ?

    • @atomsworkshop195
      @atomsworkshop195  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello Steven. I’m not sure what you are asking me. What do you mean by “digital single”?