Lesson Four | Consent of the Governed
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- To support Hillsdale free online courses, visit: bit.ly/2Iy2thr
Because all Men are equal and free, no one can rule another without the consent of the people. Consent is a fundamental principle of a free government, therefore it has significant implications for the form of government to be adopted.
Discover the profound truths of the Constitution in an entirely new way through Hillsdale College’s “Introduction to the Constitution.” Find yourself at the table with Dr. Larry Arnn, as he teaches his students the principles of liberty. Experience the lively discussions that take place as students explore the implications and beauty of our Constitution.
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 2 | 29 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r3lfLNH6Ke4/mqdefault.jpg)
... Someone should send this class to the House, Senate and the Surpreme Court ...😉...
@Oatmeal Joey Arnold ... for go the infowars, Alex knows better...he's nothing more than the people he reports on ... Look up Lyndon LeRouche ...
The key individuals in our Government know these principles very well. It is, unfortunately, for the time being, in their interest to ignore these principles. It’s up to us to change those interests.
@@arcad1an292 I agree
Especially John Roberts...Chief pain in the arse
Do you think they would listen to it and actually hear and comprehend the meaning of the words? Probably not. After all, they are the Gods of the day and we're not.
Should be required education in middle school
EVERY school.
Some days, I wish I had it to do all over again. I would have went to college here. This is where out true leaders should come from. Excellent series.
Awesome, amazing comprehensive lecture on politics, philosophy, history and ultimately Constitutional Law, the Constitution of the United States of America and the Declaration of Independence as a Legacy for mankind.
Formidable, Excellent, Bravos🙏🙏🙏💪💪💪👏👏👏
I like ur comment 👍
If I had it to do over id sent my child to Hillsdale instead of Belmont. Belmont planted more doubts in what she was taught than I thought was possible. The most expensive mistake we ever made.
We have all made horrible mistakes of omission with our children. Just realize that love for your child is basic and impossible to deny. Unfortunately, it is probably to late to be an active parent any longer. Hopefully with some guidance and open discussion from afar they can still be brought around but as long as they have basic values their is still hope.
Even Hillsdale gets some things WRONG.
All MEN (the plural of a MAN, does not include women, children, savages, similar) are created equal.
We were not a ship's company. We were not in the military as a 'group of men'.
Hillsdale includes women and others in their definition of MEN.
And that is not the definition our founders meant.
Why? To learn propaganda?
There is no such thing as consent of the governed.
You should buy your kids the book, The most dangerous superstition.
That will cover 4 years of this crap college.
If everyone graduated from this college isn't basically an anarchist then Clearly they learn statist propaganda.
The democracy cult = a lot of humans give consent for the entire population to be forcibly controlled aka governed. Forcible control of the governed with the consent of a third party.
Ex, your neighbor gives consent for another human to come and rob you. The neighbor is too scarred to do such thing himself so he relies on thugs employed by "government" to do it for him. For if he did it he would be a criminal, but if the government sanctioned employee does it then its suddenly moral and justified due to the belief in authority.
I hope all of these students actually go into government and rebuild a base of Constitutional government from a local level all the way up to the federal level.
Ppl never learn, government equal forcible control, slavery
Awesome job, Hillsdale College!
These videos should be shown to every 9th grade student in this country.
and 10th and 11th, and 12th and....
Start at 7th grade
“Authority should be derived from the consent of the governed; not by the threat of force!” Barbie in Toy Story 3.
BO once said to the UN assembly that people of the world do not have the ability to govern themselves and must be governed, for their own good, by someone or something higher than themselves. I thought of God. But i do not think BO had the same thing in mind.
No he didn't have God on his mind. He had himself and Hillary on his mind!
You DO know that something called the Constitution is what governs all people under it? The people rule, but they do not govern. It seems some liberals know that much better than virtue-signaling conservatives
Yes however the Constitution was meant to bind those in government as much as it does the governed, by putting limits on power. Rulers who think they know better than the citizenry regarding what is good for them are prone to abusing their power. This is something to be vigilant of no matter one's politics.
Jesus Christ loves you
That's the reason why every person should own a gun. "You get to be the King, IF we say so."
Consent of the Governed is presumed, whether it is given or is not. therefore, it
Is not by consent - it is mandate
@@delightfulgenius4635 "How can you have the consent of the governed if you do not have the consent of the governed?"
Have you registered to vote?
A video here on TH-cam titled
"WATCH: Sen. Dick Durbin questions Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett" The one that is 21 minutes and 3 seconds long
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. questioned Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Oct. 14, the third day of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing
. "You are the first nominee for a vacancy on the Supreme Court to be considered after July 1 of the election year. …
@ 1:38 "there's still long lines, unforgivably long lines, for people who just want to exercise their right to vote,
>>>>>>>>>the governed who want to give their consent senator Cor???
@@delightfulgenius4635 If you have registered to vote, and then voted. You have consented to be governed. And you did it under the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments.
A presumption of contract is fraud.
Unless you give informed consent it is fraud.
Can a landlord PRESUME certain elements in a rental contract or does it have to be in writing?
Even leases have the terms (all of them) listed in that contract and you have time to review the terms before signing.
Landlord cannot presume you gave consent.
Rule of thumb: if it ain't in writing, it don't count.
It is not consent is presumed, it is consent is ASSUMED.
@@rentiap Not true. And even if you did consent, you can withdraw it at any time.
One can vote for someone to manage certain things but not be your boss. And certainly no EMPLOYEE (aka government worker and similar) can tell their BOSS (aka you) what you can and cannot do, especially under pain of fines, prison, limitations on your rights, and even death if you do not comply.
When you sign your voting slip, driver's license, any 'contract' with the government (federal or state), you write without prejudice, all rights reserved.
Or you can sign right before your signature NA (stands for non assumpsit).
Consent must be clear and overt, not fraudulent.
@@crazysquirrel9425 ARTICLE XIV.
SECTION 1. All persons born or naturalized in
the United States, and *subject to* the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside.
Subject
adjective
being under domination, control, or influence (often followed by to).
being under dominion, rule, or authority, as of a sovereign, state, or some governing power; owing allegiance or obedience (often followed by to).
open or exposed (usually followed by to): subject to ridicule.
being dependent or conditional upon something (usually followed by to): His consent is subject to your approval.
being under the necessity of undergoing something (usually followed by to): All beings are subject to death.
liable; prone (usually followed by to): subject to headaches.
verb (used with object)
to bring under domination, control, or influence (usually followed by to).
to bring under dominion, rule, or authority, as of a conqueror or a governing power (usually followed by to).
to cause to undergo the action of something specified; expose (usually followed by to): to subject metal to intense heat.
to make liable or vulnerable; lay open; expose (usually followed by to): to subject oneself to ridicule.
Obsolete. to place beneath something; make subjacent.
To register to vote one must(not may) be a citizen who is subject to the jurisdiction thereof the United States.
The 13th amendment did not free the slaves, but did allow one to claim voluntary servitude.
The 14th amendment took all of those supposed freed slaves who were subject to a slave master, and just changed not only the slaves master, to be the government of the United States, but also made it possible for one of "The People" to claim to be of the lowly, second class status of a voluntary servitude, 14th amendment citizen who is subject to the jurisdiction thereof the United States.
When registering to vote, the 15th amendment got one to make the claim of being of that second class of a citizen, to be eligible to register to vote. then
When one votes(there is no provision to make a qualified signature when one does the deed of voting) one cements your consent to be governed.(and is evidenced by the video of the senators that I referenced in the previous post)
As far as you claiming that the government cannot put limitations on your rights.
You, as a citizen under ARTICLE IV SECTION 2 have no rights, a citizen under your Constitution only has privileges and immunities. When one claims that status of a lowly second class citizen, one gives up any rights one had when born, to only having privileges and immunities. The first ten amendments/bill of rights only apply to "The People".
Please show us with quotes where a citizen is mentioned in the first ten amendments?
ARTICLE IV SECTION. 2. "The Citizens of each State shall
be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of
Citizens in the several States."
ARTICLE IV SECTION. 2. *does not say.*
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Rights of The People in the several States.
Outstanding!!!!!!
Superb
The term "Consent of the Governed" is an OXYMORON. Here's why:
**Definition of "Consent"**
- Consent means a voluntary agreement to or approval of what is done or proposed by another. It implies a free choice made without coercion.
**Definition of "Governed"**
- To be governed means to be subject to the authority and control of a governing body or authority, which enforces its rules and decisions through coercive means.
**The Contradiction**
1. **Coercion Inherent in Government**:
- Government inherently operates through coercion. Laws, taxes, and regulations are enforced through the threat of violence or punishment (e.g., fines, imprisonment). This contradicts the notion of consent, which requires voluntary agreement free of coercion.
2. **Lack of Genuine Choice**:
- For consent to be valid, individuals must have the genuine option to refuse. In the context of government, individuals cannot opt out of being governed without facing consequences. This lack of a real choice undermines the idea that their compliance is consensual.
3. **Social Contract Fallacy**:
- The concept of the social contract suggests that people implicitly consent to be governed by living within a certain territory. However, implicit consent is not the same as explicit, voluntary consent. Many individuals never explicitly agree to the terms imposed by the government, and their continued presence in a territory is not necessarily an endorsement of the government’s authority.
4. **Consent of the Majority vs. Individual Consent**:
- Even if a majority consents to a government, it does not mean that every individual within that society consents. True consent must be individual, not collective, and should respect the autonomy of each person. Majority rule can lead to the imposition of the will of the majority on the minority, which again contradicts the principle of voluntary consent.
What if our consent is naturally formed at birth and we're not actually making that consent but we live by it and throughout the years are government and our president do not keep up with their end of the bargain what do we do then. 👍🇺🇸
Google how to withdraw consent to be governed.
Tells you what to write and such.
It is not on the tube either.
@@crazysquirrel9425 well of course not because that's our declaration of Independence look up the declaration of Independence
@@crazysquirrel9425 are straight lookup Americans and the consent of the governed like I said they're going to make it hard for you to find cuz they don't want you to know the truth
@@crazysquirrel9425 and just to be on the realistic side it might be in the jurisdial branches of our government but the fundamental values of our country and the laws of the land are back does first 10 amendments are backed up by our liberties our rights under the declaration of Independence and the consent of the government is in the declaration of Independence are the layout is in the jurisdiction branches of the government
They go coherently together cuz they back up each other and our amendments back them up that's what they are there they're documents that back up our freedoms are rights and our liberties to the other freedom and rights and liberties that are our laws of our land
Real question is how do we the people deny consent under the code of law and statutes...voluntary consent and coerced consent are two different things .
Voluntary servitude was neither discussed or even mentioned in your Constitution.
The question you should be asking,,,, that was not answered in this video. Is. How is it that we supposedly/allegedly consent to be governed?
Your answer is in ARTICLES XIII, XIV, AND XV.
When you listen to all these lessons, you realize how far away we are from the foundation and truths of our formation we are. It’s not because we are lost, but rather we are being led and controlled.
I'm doing 1984 on audio 1st time too close for comfort God bless the United States of America
Can someone correct the listing order they are going 1, 2, 4, 3, 5 etc. This is not the way I learned to count.
If a leader is only a leader if the people say so, then surely that would be a representative of the people and not a leader. At what point does entitlement of the masses to choose what they want cease and leadership step in for the purpose of protecting them from their own collective stupidity? Should there not be a recruitment/apprenticeship process to train leaders from those selected by the people?
Our government thinks the same way the king does
Spin dictors 😂 its not in the consitution
The term "Consent of the Governed" is actually an OXYMORON. Here's why:
**Definition of "Consent"**
- Consent means a voluntary agreement to or approval of what is done or proposed by another. It implies a free choice made without coercion.
**Definition of "Governed"**
- To be governed means to be subject to the authority and control of a governing body or authority, which enforces its rules and decisions through coercive means.
**The Contradiction**
1. **Coercion Inherent in Government**:
- Government inherently operates through coercion. Laws, taxes, and regulations are enforced through the threat of violence or punishment (e.g., fines, imprisonment). This contradicts the notion of consent, which requires voluntary agreement free of coercion.
2. **Lack of Genuine Choice**:
- For consent to be valid, individuals must have the genuine option to refuse. In the context of government, individuals cannot opt out of being governed without facing consequences. This lack of a real choice undermines the idea that their compliance is consensual.
3. **Social Contract Fallacy**:
- The concept of the social contract suggests that people implicitly consent to be governed by living within a certain territory. However, implicit consent is not the same as explicit, voluntary consent. Many individuals never explicitly agree to the terms imposed by the government, and their continued presence in a territory is not necessarily an endorsement of the government’s authority.
4. **Consent of the Majority vs. Individual Consent**:
- Even if a majority consents to a government, it does not mean that every individual within that society consents. True consent must be individual, not collective, and should respect the autonomy of each person. Majority rule can lead to the imposition of the will of the majority on the minority, which again contradicts the principle of voluntary consent.
Telling us what we could do is not telling us HOW to do.
And what to write and who to send it to.
Since income and property taxes require you to consent to be governed, then withdrawing that consent should negate the obligation to pay either.
Power to tax comes from the government who in turn requires your consent to force you to pay taxes. LOL
Just think; withdraw your consent to be governed and you no longer need a DRIVER'S LICENSE. (well you weren't supposed to need it anyway).
Withdrawing consent is not freedom to commit atrocities and such. You still are under common law and natural law. It is just that the government can't legitimately enforce those laws nor punish you.
Driving is and always has been a priveledge,not a right!!!!!
@@scottclute-e3g Not always. Also, 'DRIVING' is a commercial activity.
TRAVELING in your personal conveyance of your choice is not.
As such, it is a fundamental right.
No where does one need government permission to use their own property on public roads you pay for.
I have posted many court decisions confirming the RIGHT to travel unhindered (and still respecting others free right to travel).
If all else fails, see 9th amendment.
If THAT fails, show us exactly where did anyone give informed consent to beg permission to travel?
Social contract could be understood as the relationship we establish to each others in a social community in its form of acting or social roles.
I never gave informed consent to any social contract.
Anything else is fraud.
only true patriots watch these series...
A true patriot that doesn't live as a sovereign missed the entire point of the Declaration of Independence. A republican government requires continual consent. If it is operating under a presumption that we consented just by virtue of having been born in one of the several States, then it has no authority.
AMEN 🙏
And it's people like you that give me hope I like ur comment God bless you and God bless the United States of America 🇺🇸 🙏 ❤
Excellent video, great production quality, Dr. Larry Arnn was very moving with his soft-spoken demeanor. Unfortunately, he's like an old fool who keeps recounting mythical stories of old, thinking that they apply today. What is said in theory, appears to make sense but there is a DISTINCT contrast when you look at the real-world effects. Yes, it is remarkable that we were one of the first countries to question authority, but the fact that they still thought it'd work is the folly of man, putting our well-being in the hands of others. Thinking that when another human being is granted special rights he won't abuse it. The actual concept of another ruling over another is just flat-out immoral, but the founding fathers never saw it that way. The idea of consent of the governed undermines individuals who wish to live contrary to the supposed ''laws''.
this should be taught in grade school
we think we are born equal and more equal than we from any other country.
what about if 1 consents to being searched and 1 does not but is searched legally anyway ?
Perplexing comment! I do think all people are born equal but no citizen or resident is more equal than another one. That's why current displeasure over two-tiered judicial system. Doesnt any country decide it's own legal matters? Consent to search has had a pretty flexible boundary in this one but whatever current law is it should apply to all
Living here. I think that is what was wrong with "stop and frisk" policy--it wasn't being applied equally.
We give them permission to the services that they're supposed to be providing under legal contract and if they don't keep their end of the legal contract we can take our consent back because it's not a signing over of our sovereignty like right here and now in this day and age right this minute but you know that's for free people not for slaves.!! That's what we all are today and have been for quite some time since before we were born.
I am on board, but this guy is asking rhetorical questions.
its from the Declaration of Independence it is not about our consitution. 🤷♀️ Spin Doctors
Only Communists give these videos a thumbs down. They like the harness and saddle.
Hammer.....The sickle,and
When did I consent to be governed, or who consented on my behalf without telling me?
Miller Richard Brown Lisa Williams Frank
Is this the whole course you get in the dvd? Or is this just part of it?
this is way too awesome
The picture of Hamilton. Lol. He was a statist
Actually, Lincoln was the real tyrant.
🤨 Accept something that is someone else’s desire- interesting.
I had a talking cat, so, whatever