Graduating from High School in the 70's, Civics and/or American Government was a required class for all seniors (you could also take the class during your Junior year). Today, in most Public schools, it's not a required class, and it hasn't been for a long time. As a result of dropping the requirement, we now have nearly two generations of Political Illiterates. Thank you Hillsdale for your Constitution 101 series. I found it it helpful and informative, and I've a better understaning of our Founding Documents.
These are truly ..all of them are special and it’s just so happens to be timing. God‘s timing in these professors are a godsend their time lead up to this. Very historical biblical time for these videos on TH-cam. It’s all about timing God‘s timing. And I appreciate every single one student professor all of them that tribute to the work of these videos. GOD BLESS All
"Animals use their voice to indicate pleasure and pain, people speak to distinguish the just from the unjust." - Beautiful. To be an animal or to be a person, now that is the question... hm.
As a first point , I completely agree and understand the intent of the statement, “ All me were created equal”. However, I believe that all me were “equally created is far more accurate “. Equality is a state exhibited or interpreted by mankind. Really, great series, I wish every student in school would be required to watch this at the start of every school year. We as citizens should know what and why this document actually means. Great work, I’d love to have been in such a session.
Sir, I wish to thank you for these lessons you are teaching. I'm 67 and I have learned more now than I did. You are great at what you are doing. Again, thank you.
I wanted to let you know how much I appreciate you highlighting the Democratic party's video clips during the ads that run on TH-cam for your constitutional lectures. It lets people know that the Democrats have done the most to back the Constitution and provide the American public with the freedoms afforded by it. Thanks again.
It gives me happiness to see Americans learning like this … that’s how was supposed to be ! I’m going to have a long night listening these lectures while not working!
The fundamental difference between men and not just dogs but also the entirety of creation is that we are the only ones made not just in the image of God, but also the only part of creation in which God breathed life into us. That life is the endowment in each of us an immortal soul, which makes us like God in that we are, from conception, an immortal being. Nothing else in the whole of creation can make the same claim.
Until a few months back and watching what’s happening to this gracious country that allowed me the privilege of becoming its citizen, I have been moved to learn more about it. This videos are very interesting. Wanna keep watching. Ignorance is one of the greatest enemies to any country or kingdom.
I sure enjoyed lessons one and two. And I am looking forward to watching all the lessons. Thank you so much for making these available! My dad thought very highly of Hillsdale College and I believe he gave money now and then. I totally appreciate God being centered in all the teachings. God bless you sir!
My own answer to what equality means when it was said all men are created equal. I came up with as a boy, That all man are created with and equal ability to do good or evil.
Our notion of rights against unjust treatment is not limited to humans. This essence of conscience is seen in other animals as well. Dogs recognize injustice and pack dogs reject leaders they don't trust, while humans just complain. A lot of good language does us.
"When you are thinking you are thinking to your self, you are thinking out loud and when your thinking your talking to your self... it's the same thing"... Mind blowing... 10/10
6/16/2022 I can be forced to do something through intimidation, pain, and punishment, but no one can take the freedom, which lies within me, unless I give it up willingly. True freedom lies within ones self, while liberty lies within the hands of those who rule over us. This was played out in feudal Japan. No one had liberty, but everyone had freedom within themselves, and everyone would spend as much of their life, living within that freedom. If given the opportunity every living being on this earth will express that inner freedom, externally through taking the liberty they feel they wish to express, within the just and proper law. Today, in Viet Nam there is a repressive government. There are, however, individuals that go off into the jungle and build a FREE life, away from society. They are expressing that inner freedom, by creating their own liberty, and at some great expense too. ;-)
Now machines speak are they equal? Heaven no it is of course our humanity that makes us equal in the eyes of the Devine because we are all created in the image of GOD.
Would’ve been great to see Walter E Williams before he passed take part in this, maybe there should be guest lectures by the likes of Thomas Sowell & Larry Elder. Robert Barnes crushed it when he spoke during the Unconstitutional Lockdowns segment, can’t wait to see what is put forth next!
Word spinning at it's finest. Speech is a form of communication. There are other forms of communication. Bees, for instance, by dancing can show other bees in their hive information about the direction and distance to flowers yielding nectar and pollen, describe the richness of the source, show sources of water, or show new nest-site locations. That is failrly complicated information. I suspect humans couldn't duplicate that (by dancing). Whales and dolphins use sounds, body language and physical contact to communicate with other whales and dophins. Whales use very low frequency sounds to communicate long distances, even across ocean basins. This is not to say that any animal has developed communication to the level humans have, but it is a matter of degree, not a matter of humans having something that no other animal has.
This may be difficult but try to consider the perspective of Native Americans and Black people who's ancestors were not considered men ...try to watch this again pretending you are in their shoes and hopefully you can see the answer to your question 👎 Makes me want to🤮 actually
I've been following, and saving your series on the Constitution, for my Grandkids - but unbelievably, and yet, not surprisingly - this platform keeps erasing them from my "saved," items. (Yours are not the only ones).
The founding fathers meant "the pursuit of happiness " and 'equality " to go hand in hand. The pursuit meant in a financial sense. The ability to make money to be happy. That all men are equal means that all men make about the same amount of money or have about equal chances to do so. There's over 50 trillion dollars In private wealth. In order for everyone to be equal that money must be distributed equally. Works out at about 350,000$ per person. Thats what all men are created equal means. As of now... all men are created unequal. Inequality is rampant. Every citizen can have atleast 100,000$ in their savings account and still have a bunch of millionaires and a few billionaires. Instead we have a millions of homeless with tens of thousands in university debt in exchange for millions of millionaires and 100s of billionaires.
Equality means that all human being and living beings got the same rights under the Laws of Nature and of nature's of God,to life,liberty and pursuit of happiness cause were created under his laws here on 🌎.And as Humans being the Faith and the Reason granted from those Laws of Nature and nature's of god gave us our freedom.
So, if we're all created equal, how'd we get to the point that a bunch of you can get together and make up "laws" that I must be subject too? If you and I are equal, you have no lawful power over me. If neither you nor anyone else has any lawful power over me, how does zero + zero + zero + zero, etc. = something greater than zero just because a bunch of you get together and so decide? In other words, what if I do NOT consent to YOUR governance? Honest question!
I think it's because humans like to be in control without being controlled; we want things to go our own way. I struggle with doubt about the possibility of true equality and absolute freedom being simultaneously attainable. I also doubt either can be wholly fulfilled on their own. It's like freedom and equality are both things we can all have in half measures, but not entirely because people always seek to control. Revolutions just lead to new regimes.
RKBA well easy to say that ecosystem makes everything different to help sustain this world. But People will always search for equality. Because this is a human society. Doesn’t matter what the god intended to. We human have to pursue equality to sustain. If we are free to kill me also you are stronger than me. That literally means I will be killed. There goes chaos to society. Here is when equality kicks in to help.
That was why The Constitution was written so that the govt. cannot overeach their powers. The Constitution is a set of rules/laws that protect us from the govt.
Anarchists (true Anarchists, not violent nihilists) have been ruminating on this question for as long as there have been Anarchists. The knee-jerk answer that everyone likes to throw out there is that it is the price you pay to live within a society. The assumption being that by living in this society we voluntarily agree to do what these leaders say, and by proxy we must also obey the orders of the armed enforcers of their words, or they have the tacit right to take our lives. I don't know about you, but that is not a contract I would ever voluntarily agree to honor. Yet, I am never permitted a chance to opt out. I would happily go live off-grid but that is illegal to. The Branch Davidians, and the family at Ruby Ridge learned that one as did the Native American tribes. I truly believe that all enforcement of rules and laws is immoral because no man has the right to take the life of another and no man has the right to lock another in a cage. The argument that it is required for our safety doesn't hold up to the most basic scrutiny. In the animal world groups of deadly predators live together without killing other members of the group. They will kill interlopers that are not part of the pack but usually just run the intruder off instead. Ancient, (pre-Christian) societies were not full of thieves and murderers. They were (for the most part) agrarian societies concerned with the greater good of the entire tribe. It is also interesting to note that the few tribes that did believe in killing or caging other humans are also the only tribes that believe in monsters, demons, evil spirits, and deities. The voluntaryist, non-violent tribes do not believe in Gods or Demons or Evil. They have a reverence for the earth itself as the giver and taker of life but don't assign it any sort of prescient powers. It certainly warrants considering the fact that the more rules and laws are made and the more brutally they are enforced the more violent and dangerous society becomes.
“All men are created equal.” Which means all men and women were created by our Father in Heaven with equal amounts of love toward all his children. It therefore means if we recognize his love for his children we must treat each person with that same love.
Can anyone answer this for me? I asked on another show and it wasn't answered. Thanks: "Why isn't anyone talking about an organized communication campaign to several specific officials and news media? This is exemplified by the US Constitution as Step #1. I find it odd no one is orchestrating something like paper letters and public decrees to show the genuine will of The People. Thank you." This is clarification that I added after the original question: What I'm saying is, if we're a nation of laws and have protocols to abide in that law, why isn't anyone promoting documentation of our legal management from "We the People" to the elected/appointed officials so same officials must then comply, argue for a compromise, or be openly defiant to the lawful will of the People they represent and serve? If Conservatives would have organized a letter-campaign and petitions instead of that Jan 6 march/protest which was used against us, in the end, we would have Legal Grounds to replace and force the defiant swampers/useless career politicians out of office and replaced with moral/effective servants. It seems everyone is looking right past the trees to the forest and not doing step one of a Constitutional legal battle, that being, service of complaint and decree of desired remedy from the "We the People" party in this complaint. Does this help clarify? Thank you.
3:31 dogs are far more loyal than people and it's unfortunate that they don't have our version of the fox P2 Gene but they still communicate with us just fine if you know how to listen
The distinctions are important To regard rational creatures versus animals that will eat each other alive but I don't see the relevance to the Constitution. The Constitution is a pact between consenting adults. As to equality, We are born equal and that equality demands respect with regard to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words we each respect the other's life liberty and pursuit of happiness as a consequence of being born equal. We are more equal or less equal contrary to certain beliefs and opinions of certain classes that shred the Constitution and the rule of law and should be in jail.
remember you analogy of dogs and humans? crazy how the founding fathers (and landmark cases like dredd scott are examples of that) looked at the general public as unfit to run a govt. Not only did the constitution not apply to the disenfranchised but the signers never looked at you as equals to begin with. More than anything we were probably indistinguishable to the founding fathers between livestock and people.
I don't believe much has changed in that regard. I have witnessed with my own two eyes, the absolute disdain the government has for anyone who is not a business owner. They have treated Doctors, Scientists, Researchers, and Academics with utter contempt, laughed and mocked their expertise, and cast aspersions against their character because their words were not in the business owner's best interest. Apparently the Creator and the founding fathers believed that economic net worth determines the worth of a human life. That is what the government and the conservative Christians believe. It runs afoul of every thing I was taught about Jesus Christ, but then my medical degree is no match for their economics education right?
I always felt that equality is about intrinsic value versus extrinsic value. All human kind have infinite intrinsic value. Our worth is not what we produce or how brilliant or capable we are. Our worth is related to our value to Deity. Equality is not sameness. Sameness is boring, and rather useless.
"Created equal" he found an "Educated" way around the fact that out Equalness is derived from our common CREATOR, who did not give unalienable rights to dogs. A human is not a dog, but it isn't because the Creator has made it so. His poetic argumentation kinda goes out the window when a child is born mute, unable to speak...Yet because dignity is that which is bestowed by the Creator becauae of who He is, not what man can do ie speak. Hia speaking or communication is a communicable attribute of the Creator, the Lord Jesus The Christ Himself.
Animals don't speak? Koko. I elk hunt and they have amazing social networks. Some of the comments are very stereotypical and ideological, over simplification of reality in the reality you want to see and believe.
Yet, here we are with you voicing your respect for the beasts you hunt, but they remain unable to speak for themselves. All living things form social hierarchies, but we communicate to pass on our knowledge. Therein lies our mastery over savage nature.
@@johnbrown4627 Many animals communicate to pass on knowledge. "Our mastery" sound hubris. Assuming a savage nature is closed minded. Dogs eat cats and rabbits, except when we communicate that it is not acceptable, or when others dogs don't show them how. Some figure it out on their own, but the nature vs nurture, assuming it has to be one way, is a weak argument. Respect? It is more about the dissolution that they are "just dumb" but nor would I argue they deserve rights of humanity.
@@chriscockrell9495 if what you say is true, then why not recognize an animals rights are the same as our own? I think mastery of our surroundings is evident, just look around. The passing on of knowledge by animals pales in comparison to what speech has brought humanity. Most of all is our ability to communicate our way out of violence despite our savage nature, not a savage nature. I did not mention nature vs nurture, but rather compared human capacity of speech to that of animals. Lastly, animals do deserve respect. I would not try to take an elk down by hand, it would easily out run me, or give me a violent beating--respect. Ultimately I agree with you last statement. I believe Mr. Arn was correct, in that speech is the defining characteristic worthy of our inalienable rights.
@@johnbrown4627 I'm not sure I'd use the rhetoric that what I've said it true, as much as it is my perspective. I'm willing to agree that all humans are created equal. So public policy created to impact each human equally, is reasonable. To say all species are created equal, I don't agree and would give dogs the same rights. I reject your savage nature claim, again, which you are weaving into your rhetoric. It is the Darwinian idea that is so wrong. th-cam.com/video/kY6mCVCubjI/w-d-xo.html 7 minutes in she starts it and then at 28 minutes in. Yes, and I compared Koko's communication to that of humans. The point is that sign language can facilitate human level of sophistication and koko could communicate on the order of magnitude as many humans. Not so different and that is the only significant form of communication we've really tried to teach animals. Respect has many meanings so without know what you think is respect, what are it's forms, I've a tough time having an opinion on respect toward animals.
@@johnbrown4627 The idea of our "savage nature" is the Darwinian idea. Our natural savagery is ruled by reason and emotion. It is heavily tied to the classical idea of emotion when reason fails. Neuroscience destroy that view. The argument that naturally some way, good or bad, and are taught. Or the opposite, they learn to be good or bad and children are a lump of clay to be modeled. Nature vs Nurture. Which I don't think is reasonable. It is an argument that many believe but neither is truly accurate. "Therein lies our mastery over savage nature." You are assuming the nature argument as a premise. I'm not sure that is how we should view humans.
All men are created equal. I was born an American. I have issue with 'illegals'. I interact with them regurlarly and it bothers with my conscience. I take my citizenship seriously. Extreemly serious. But I cannot let my beliefs stand in my own way. How do I deal with my predicament? These seem to be good people but I know that being illegal is hurting our system, and me personally! Has anyone else have the same type of issue.
Ummm... This is a GREAT sediment....except, his last words are you can't put a harness on people unless they volunteer. African people's ALL have speech and language, right? Farmers literally would put harnesses on black folks and tell them to plow the field. I'm just saying it just seems to me that if the founding fathers were using Larry's logic, we would have NEVER had slavery in America. Just sayin'
I’m concerned about this concept of speech and talking being the thing that makes all humans equal and distinctly different from animals. I’ve never heard that. That’s not commonly received wisdom, and I don’t think it should be. I see you’re trying to make a specific point, about the power of the “consent of the governed” ideal in the U.S., and I’m happy our country was founded on some of these ideals for sure. But the connection between “talking people” and “all men are created equal” really bares no validity. If speech (the ability to talk) is how we define another being as equal to us, then should persons of different abilities (like deaf-mutes) who have the inability to speak or hear be treated as less than equal humans because of their disability? Do animals, who use complex language, deserve to be treated as savage beasts? “Gunnison's prairie dogs seem to have a fairly complex language... rather than just sounding a basic alarm call, researchers have found that their alarm calls can describe specific predator speed, color, shape, and size... So when is this communication complex enough for us to call it a language? Elephants have been found to communicate across miles of land through subsonic sound. And when researchers slow a hummingbird's chirp down, it seems the song may be as complex as a song from some other birds, though more studies need to be done to understand this. Do we view animal "language" as limited just because we have trouble understanding it?” - Source: askabiologist.asu.edu/questions/human-animal-differences#:~:text=Humans%20and%20animals%20both%20eat%2C%20sleep%2C%20think%2C%20and%20communicate.&text=Some%20people%20think%20that%20the,your%20own%20thoughts%20and%20feelings). Again, “consent of the governed” is a wonderful philosophic idea and I’m glad the U.S. was founded on that value (amongst others), but if you’re saying that “talking/speech” is fundamentally required to be considered equal to another human being…or that “talking/speech” is the difference between humans and animals…you’re thinking too small. And/or you’re not up to speed on modern science. Either way, if our founding fathers were here today, they would urge Dr. Arnn to think bigger.
Graduating from High School in the 70's, Civics and/or American Government was a required class for all seniors (you could also take the class during your Junior year). Today, in most Public schools, it's not a required class, and it hasn't been for a long time. As a result of dropping the requirement, we now have nearly two generations of Political Illiterates.
Thank you Hillsdale for your Constitution 101 series. I found it it helpful and informative, and I've a better understaning of our Founding Documents.
I like your comment God bless you and God bless the united states of America 🇺🇸 🙏 ❤
These are truly ..all of them are special and it’s just so happens to be timing. God‘s timing in these professors are a godsend their time lead up to this. Very historical biblical time for these videos on TH-cam. It’s all about timing God‘s timing. And I appreciate every single one student professor all of them that tribute to the work of these videos. GOD BLESS All
I like your comment God bless you and God bless the United States of America 🇺🇸 🙏 ❤
"Animals use their voice to indicate pleasure and pain, people speak to distinguish the just from the unjust." - Beautiful. To be an animal or to be a person, now that is the question... hm.
Thank you Hillsdale for educating the American people.
As a first point , I completely agree and understand the intent of the statement, “ All me were created equal”. However, I believe that all me were “equally created is far more accurate “. Equality is a state exhibited or interpreted by mankind.
Really, great series, I wish every student in school would be required to watch this at the start of every school year.
We as citizens should know what and why this document actually means.
Great work, I’d love to have been in such a session.
I like your comment God bless you and God bless the United States of America 🇺🇸 🙏 ❤
Sir, I wish to thank you for these lessons you are teaching. I'm 67 and I have learned more now than I did. You are great at what you are doing. Again, thank you.
Every now and then Larry gets serious, really serious. It looks like he could stare down a buffalo. I love it.
I wanted to let you know how much I appreciate you highlighting the Democratic party's video clips during the ads that run on TH-cam for your constitutional lectures. It lets people know that the Democrats have done the most to back the Constitution and provide the American public with the freedoms afforded by it. Thanks again.
I like your comment God bless you and God bless the United States of America 🇺🇸 🙏 ❤
It gives me happiness to see Americans learning like this … that’s how was supposed to be ! I’m going to have a long night listening these lectures while not working!
The fundamental difference between men and not just dogs but also the entirety of creation is that we are the only ones made not just in the image of God, but also the only part of creation in which God breathed life into us. That life is the endowment in each of us an immortal soul, which makes us like God in that we are, from conception, an immortal being. Nothing else in the whole of creation can make the same claim.
I like your comment God bless you and God bless the United States of America 🇺🇸 🙏 ❤
Stuff like this draws a tear. Two things, two documents.. . Or compilation of documents do this to me. The Declaration of Independence and the Bible.
Until a few months back and watching what’s happening to this gracious country that allowed me the privilege of becoming its citizen, I have been moved to learn more about it. This videos are very interesting. Wanna keep watching. Ignorance is one of the greatest enemies to any country or kingdom.
America needs more lawful immigrants with your attitude. Welcome.
RKBA Thank you 😊
@@violetarios2475 You're welcome, again.
I sure enjoyed lessons one and two. And I am looking forward to watching all the lessons. Thank you so much for making these available! My dad thought very highly of Hillsdale College and I believe he gave money now and then. I totally appreciate God being centered in all the teachings. God bless you sir!
awesome series
Thank you so much for what you are doing...
My own answer to what equality means when it was said all men are created equal. I came up with as a boy, That all man are created with and equal ability to do good or evil.
Our notion of rights against unjust treatment is not limited to humans. This essence of conscience is seen in other animals as well. Dogs recognize injustice and pack dogs reject leaders they don't trust, while humans just complain. A lot of good language does us.
Amazing!
Thank you ! You are truly amazing!
"When you are thinking you are thinking to your self, you are thinking out loud and when your thinking your talking to your self... it's the same thing"... Mind blowing... 10/10
4:07 a wise man speaks because he feels like he has something to say, and a fool speaks because he feels like he has to say something
Because you were born sentient.
6/16/2022
I can be forced to do something through intimidation, pain, and punishment, but no one can take the freedom, which lies within me, unless I give it up willingly. True freedom lies within ones self, while liberty lies within the hands of those who rule over us. This was played out in feudal Japan. No one had liberty, but everyone had freedom within themselves, and everyone would spend as much of their life, living within that freedom.
If given the opportunity every living being on this earth will express that inner freedom, externally through taking the liberty they feel they wish to express, within the just and proper law.
Today, in Viet Nam there is a repressive government. There are, however, individuals that go off into the jungle and build a FREE life, away from society. They are expressing that inner freedom, by creating their own liberty, and at some great expense too. ;-)
Wow I'm blown back!!
Now machines speak are they equal? Heaven no it is of course our humanity that makes us equal in the eyes of the Devine because we are all created in the image of GOD.
Would’ve been great to see Walter E Williams before he passed take part in this, maybe there should be guest lectures by the likes of Thomas Sowell & Larry Elder. Robert Barnes crushed it when he spoke during the Unconstitutional Lockdowns segment, can’t wait to see what is put forth next!
All men are created equal, but
All men are not equally creative.
Word spinning at it's finest. Speech is a form of communication. There are other forms of communication. Bees, for instance, by dancing can show other bees in their hive information about the direction and distance to flowers yielding nectar and pollen, describe the richness of the source, show sources of water, or show new nest-site locations. That is failrly complicated information. I suspect humans couldn't duplicate that (by dancing). Whales and dolphins use sounds, body language and physical contact to communicate with other whales and dophins. Whales use very low frequency sounds to communicate long distances, even across ocean basins. This is not to say that any animal has developed communication to the level humans have, but it is a matter of degree, not a matter of humans having something that no other animal has.
This was a heavy convo
If Big Brother has his way we'll all be quacking like ducks before the end of the century.
Phenomenal
Great stuff, how could anyone thumbs down? I don't get it....
This may be difficult but try to consider the perspective of Native Americans and Black people who's ancestors were not considered men ...try to watch this again pretending you are in their shoes and hopefully you can see the answer to your question 👎
Makes me want to🤮 actually
I've been following, and saving your series on the Constitution, for my Grandkids - but unbelievably, and yet, not surprisingly - this platform keeps erasing them from my "saved," items.
(Yours are not the only ones).
All men are CREATED equal, but all men do not CREATE equally.
Yes! Using the word "illegal" for what they're doing
If we were to help ourselves to their food, money, etc., is it theft?
@@philobetto5106
Theft, it is.
The founding fathers meant "the pursuit of happiness " and 'equality " to go hand in hand. The pursuit meant in a financial sense. The ability to make money to be happy. That all men are equal means that all men make about the same amount of money or have about equal chances to do so. There's over 50 trillion dollars In private wealth. In order for everyone to be equal that money must be distributed equally. Works out at about 350,000$ per person. Thats what all men are created equal means. As of now... all men are created unequal. Inequality is rampant. Every citizen can have atleast 100,000$ in their savings account and still have a bunch of millionaires and a few billionaires. Instead we have a millions of homeless with tens of thousands in university debt in exchange for millions of millionaires and 100s of billionaires.
Profound.
It seems wasteful to get an ad for Hillsdale college on a Hillsdale college video.
I was born in the same economic situation as a famous NBA player. But I'm not as rich as him. That famous NBA player robbed me of an NBA salary.
Equality means that all human being and living beings got the same rights under the Laws of Nature and of nature's of God,to life,liberty and pursuit of happiness cause were created under his laws here on 🌎.And as Humans being the Faith and the Reason granted from those Laws of Nature and nature's of god gave us our freedom.
Wow!
Is this the whole course you get in the dvd? Or is this just part of it?
So, if we're all created equal, how'd we get to the point that a bunch of you can get together and make up "laws" that I must be subject too? If you and I are equal, you have no lawful power over me. If neither you nor anyone else has any lawful power over me, how does zero + zero + zero + zero, etc. = something greater than zero just because a bunch of you get together and so decide? In other words, what if I do NOT consent to YOUR governance? Honest question!
That's a great question and one that I have thought of for years.
Flawed man makes flawed laws but a just God makes perfect laws!
I think it's because humans like to be in control without being controlled; we want things to go our own way. I struggle with doubt about the possibility of true equality and absolute freedom being simultaneously attainable. I also doubt either can be wholly fulfilled on their own. It's like freedom and equality are both things we can all have in half measures, but not entirely because people always seek to control.
Revolutions just lead to new regimes.
RKBA well easy to say that ecosystem makes everything different to help sustain this world. But People will always search for equality. Because this is a human society. Doesn’t matter what the god intended to. We human have to pursue equality to sustain. If we are free to kill me also you are stronger than me. That literally means I will be killed. There goes chaos to society. Here is when equality kicks in to help.
That was why The Constitution was written so that the govt. cannot overeach their powers. The Constitution is a set of
rules/laws that protect us from the govt.
Anarchists (true Anarchists, not violent nihilists) have been ruminating on this question for as long as there have been Anarchists. The knee-jerk answer that everyone likes to throw out there is that it is the price you pay to live within a society. The assumption being that by living in this society we voluntarily agree to do what these leaders say, and by proxy we must also obey the orders of the armed enforcers of their words, or they have the tacit right to take our lives.
I don't know about you, but that is not a contract I would ever voluntarily agree to honor. Yet, I am never permitted a chance to opt out. I would happily go live off-grid but that is illegal to. The Branch Davidians, and the family at Ruby Ridge learned that one as did the Native American tribes.
I truly believe that all enforcement of rules and laws is immoral because no man has the right to take the life of another and no man has the right to lock another in a cage. The argument that it is required for our safety doesn't hold up to the most basic scrutiny. In the animal world groups of deadly predators live together without killing other members of the group. They will kill interlopers that are not part of the pack but usually just run the intruder off instead.
Ancient, (pre-Christian) societies were not full of thieves and murderers. They were (for the most part) agrarian societies concerned with the greater good of the entire tribe. It is also interesting to note that the few tribes that did believe in killing or caging other humans are also the only tribes that believe in monsters, demons, evil spirits, and deities. The voluntaryist, non-violent tribes do not believe in Gods or Demons or Evil. They have a reverence for the earth itself as the giver and taker of life but don't assign it any sort of prescient powers. It certainly warrants considering the fact that the more rules and laws are made and the more brutally they are enforced the more violent and dangerous society becomes.
Nomore
“All men are created equal.” Which means all men and women were created by our Father in Heaven with equal amounts of love toward all his children. It therefore means if we recognize his love for his children we must treat each person with that same love.
Can anyone answer this for me? I asked on another show and it wasn't answered. Thanks:
"Why isn't anyone talking about an organized communication campaign to several specific officials and news media? This is exemplified by the US Constitution as Step #1. I find it odd no one is orchestrating something like paper letters and public decrees to show the genuine will of The People. Thank you."
This is clarification that I added after the original question:
What I'm saying is, if we're a nation of laws and have protocols to abide in that law, why isn't anyone promoting documentation of our legal management from "We the People" to the elected/appointed officials so same officials must then comply, argue for a compromise, or be openly defiant to the lawful will of the People they represent and serve?
If Conservatives would have organized a letter-campaign and petitions instead of that Jan 6 march/protest which was used against us, in the end, we would have Legal Grounds to replace and force the defiant swampers/useless career politicians out of office and replaced with moral/effective servants. It seems everyone is looking right past the trees to the forest and not doing step one of a Constitutional legal battle, that being, service of complaint and decree of desired remedy from the "We the People" party in this complaint. Does this help clarify? Thank you.
3:31 dogs are far more loyal than people and it's unfortunate that they don't have our version of the fox P2 Gene but they still communicate with us just fine if you know how to listen
The distinctions are important To regard rational creatures versus animals that will eat each other alive but I don't see the relevance to the Constitution. The Constitution is a pact between consenting adults. As to equality, We are born equal and that equality demands respect with regard to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words we each respect the other's life liberty and pursuit of happiness as a consequence of being born equal. We are more equal or less equal contrary to certain beliefs and opinions of certain classes that shred the Constitution and the rule of law and should be in jail.
A king must not be feared instead he has a reputation which nobody can't do...
#sharefrommewhere'smine.?
#mutualism
#equality
remember you analogy of dogs and humans? crazy how the founding fathers (and landmark cases like dredd scott are examples of that) looked at the general public as unfit to run a govt. Not only did the constitution not apply to the disenfranchised but the signers never looked at you as equals to begin with. More than anything we were probably indistinguishable to the founding fathers between livestock and people.
I don't believe much has changed in that regard. I have witnessed with my own two eyes, the absolute disdain the government has for anyone who is not a business owner. They have treated Doctors, Scientists, Researchers, and Academics with utter contempt, laughed and mocked their expertise, and cast aspersions against their character because their words were not in the business owner's best interest. Apparently the Creator and the founding fathers believed that economic net worth determines the worth of a human life. That is what the government and the conservative Christians believe. It runs afoul of every thing I was taught about Jesus Christ, but then my medical degree is no match for their economics education right?
@@mercedesb2299 You are not a Christian, are you.
I always felt that equality is about intrinsic value versus extrinsic value. All human kind have infinite intrinsic value. Our worth is not what we produce or how brilliant or capable we are. Our worth is related to our value to Deity.
Equality is not sameness. Sameness is boring, and rather useless.
Equality vs equity.
"Created equal" he found an "Educated" way around the fact that out Equalness is derived from our common CREATOR, who did not give unalienable rights to dogs.
A human is not a dog, but it isn't because the Creator has made it so.
His poetic argumentation kinda goes out the window when a child is born mute, unable to speak...Yet because dignity is that which is bestowed by the Creator becauae of who He is, not what man can do ie speak. Hia speaking or communication is a communicable attribute of the Creator, the Lord Jesus The Christ Himself.
“Hitler and Churchill have equal dignity? “ Hmmm, that’s pretty wild 😜 Hint: logos, reason
Children are created in the image of God, whereas dogs are not. The ability to think and communicate are ancillary to that, but not equivalent.
Not every single human born can talk or think though there are some who have cognitive ability of an animal due to problems
Animals don't speak? Koko. I elk hunt and they have amazing social networks. Some of the comments are very stereotypical and ideological, over simplification of reality in the reality you want to see and believe.
Yet, here we are with you voicing your respect for the beasts you hunt, but they remain unable to speak for themselves. All living things form social hierarchies, but we communicate to pass on our knowledge. Therein lies our mastery over savage nature.
@@johnbrown4627 Many animals communicate to pass on knowledge. "Our mastery" sound hubris. Assuming a savage nature is closed minded. Dogs eat cats and rabbits, except when we communicate that it is not acceptable, or when others dogs don't show them how. Some figure it out on their own, but the nature vs nurture, assuming it has to be one way, is a weak argument. Respect? It is more about the dissolution that they are "just dumb" but nor would I argue they deserve rights of humanity.
@@chriscockrell9495 if what you say is true, then why not recognize an animals rights are the same as our own? I think mastery of our surroundings is evident, just look around. The passing on of knowledge by animals pales in comparison to what speech has brought humanity. Most of all is our ability to communicate our way out of violence despite our savage nature, not a savage nature. I did not mention nature vs nurture, but rather compared human capacity of speech to that of animals. Lastly, animals do deserve respect. I would not try to take an elk down by hand, it would easily out run me, or give me a violent beating--respect. Ultimately I agree with you last statement. I believe Mr. Arn was correct, in that speech is the defining characteristic worthy of our inalienable rights.
@@johnbrown4627 I'm not sure I'd use the rhetoric that what I've said it true, as much as it is my perspective. I'm willing to agree that all humans are created equal. So public policy created to impact each human equally, is reasonable. To say all species are created equal, I don't agree and would give dogs the same rights. I reject your savage nature claim, again, which you are weaving into your rhetoric. It is the Darwinian idea that is so wrong.
th-cam.com/video/kY6mCVCubjI/w-d-xo.html 7 minutes in she starts it and then at 28 minutes in.
Yes, and I compared Koko's communication to that of humans. The point is that sign language can facilitate human level of sophistication and koko could communicate on the order of magnitude as many humans. Not so different and that is the only significant form of communication we've really tried to teach animals. Respect has many meanings so without know what you think is respect, what are it's forms, I've a tough time having an opinion on respect toward animals.
@@johnbrown4627 The idea of our "savage nature" is the Darwinian idea. Our natural savagery is ruled by reason and emotion. It is heavily tied to the classical idea of emotion when reason fails. Neuroscience destroy that view. The argument that naturally some way, good or bad, and are taught. Or the opposite, they learn to be good or bad and children are a lump of clay to be modeled. Nature vs Nurture. Which I don't think is reasonable. It is an argument that many believe but neither is truly accurate.
"Therein lies our mastery over savage nature." You are assuming the nature argument as a premise. I'm not sure that is how we should view humans.
All men are created equal.
I was born an American.
I have issue with 'illegals'.
I interact with them regurlarly and it bothers with my conscience.
I take my citizenship seriously. Extreemly serious.
But I cannot let my beliefs stand in my own way.
How do I deal with my predicament?
These seem to be good people but I know that being illegal is hurting our system, and me personally!
Has anyone else have the same type of issue.
Ummm... This is a GREAT sediment....except, his last words are you can't put a harness on people unless they volunteer. African people's ALL have speech and language, right? Farmers literally would put harnesses on black folks and tell them to plow the field. I'm just saying it just seems to me that if the founding fathers were using Larry's logic, we would have NEVER had slavery in America. Just sayin'
I’m concerned about this concept of speech and talking being the thing that makes all humans equal and distinctly different from animals. I’ve never heard that. That’s not commonly received wisdom, and I don’t think it should be.
I see you’re trying to make a specific point, about the power of the “consent of the governed” ideal in the U.S., and I’m happy our country was founded on some of these ideals for sure.
But the connection between “talking people” and “all men are created equal” really bares no validity.
If speech (the ability to talk) is how we define another being as equal to us, then should persons of different abilities (like deaf-mutes) who have the inability to speak or hear be treated as less than equal humans because of their disability?
Do animals, who use complex language, deserve to be treated as savage beasts?
“Gunnison's prairie dogs seem to have a fairly complex language... rather than just sounding a basic alarm call, researchers have found that their alarm calls can describe specific predator speed, color, shape, and size... So when is this communication complex enough for us to call it a language? Elephants have been found to communicate across miles of land through subsonic sound. And when researchers slow a hummingbird's chirp down, it seems the song may be as complex as a song from some other birds, though more studies need to be done to understand this. Do we view animal "language" as limited just because we have trouble understanding it?” - Source: askabiologist.asu.edu/questions/human-animal-differences#:~:text=Humans%20and%20animals%20both%20eat%2C%20sleep%2C%20think%2C%20and%20communicate.&text=Some%20people%20think%20that%20the,your%20own%20thoughts%20and%20feelings).
Again, “consent of the governed” is a wonderful philosophic idea and I’m glad the U.S. was founded on that value (amongst others), but if you’re saying that “talking/speech” is fundamentally required to be considered equal to another human being…or that “talking/speech” is the difference between humans and animals…you’re thinking too small. And/or you’re not up to speed on modern science.
Either way, if our founding fathers were here today, they would urge Dr. Arnn to think bigger.
Williams Michael Allen Christopher Williams Michael
Animals communicate and can teach their children according to research. I doubt they engage in philosophy, much less it's sub-fields.
Trump 2024!