Understanding the U.S. Constitution

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มิ.ย. 2017
  • The Constitution is still very much in the news these days. The basics for understanding this important document are presented here by Rabbi Hillel Katzir, J.D. This program is part of the Poudre River Public Library's "Civics @ Your Library" series.

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @tingting4980
    @tingting4980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    We have a Republic as long as We fight for it.

    • @lewisjohnson8297
      @lewisjohnson8297 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Fighting" is not equivalent to success, and is often contra-productive.

    • @kcconchgirl4ever134
      @kcconchgirl4ever134 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not while media and democrats keep calling us a democracy and people are too lazy to learn the difference

    • @jerrypeal653
      @jerrypeal653 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lewisjohnson8297 not when put in modern day context as needed

    • @lewisjohnson8297
      @lewisjohnson8297 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jerrypeal653, a population must still come to agreement as to that necessity. Our problem is that lack of agreement, accompanied by the existence of subgroups who believe to possess the right to force it upon the rest.

    • @jerrypeal653
      @jerrypeal653 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@lewisjohnson8297 force begets force !

  • @jhlasound
    @jhlasound ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This guy is awesome. We need more people to explain to these young minds how an actual legal system works and how to think.

    • @minusstage3
      @minusstage3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How does it work?

  • @alwayshavestrengthjoy7450
    @alwayshavestrengthjoy7450 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    He teaches this, just like I learned in school in the 1980’s. He breaks it down esp. the concept of we the people” as sovereign. Excellent job!

    • @lorettasanchez1184
      @lorettasanchez1184 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes I rememberwhen teachers taught

    • @byronchch3722
      @byronchch3722 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pp

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว +5

      There's another document that goes along with that that's equally or even more important that people don't really talk much about but should called the Declaration of Independence and if it's been a while since you read it you should do it again because it's that important and without it the other one (the Constitution) isn't supported with a good foundation

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@lorettasanchez1184 ah yes the good old days when they weren't somebody else's bratty kids (perspective) but instead part of my community and substantially more important given that paradigm and worthy of my investment (the Future Part).
      There's something to be said for teaching someone how to think instead of what to think which will serve them so much better in life.
      It should be kind of obvious that it's no accident or mistake everything being dumbed down because people who can think for themselves are orders of magnitude harder to control then distracted people on autopilot who are averse to learning

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/play/PLAYxecbGotUyOGDXLw2M4NR4uK6WrAFbt.html
      There are none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
      If you watch the video do so from the perspective of personal responsibility rather than trying to identify a bad actor or assign blame otherwise it's not going to do as much for you as it could have because the herd is what keeps us stuck when General consensus might as well be gospel and people will believe anything most others believe even when it's demonstrably dead wrong it seems

  • @neutrino3630
    @neutrino3630 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The USA is a Representative Republic & the Electorial College (EC) prevents mob of the minority of the republic, by the majority of the republic. That's why the EC is significant, essential & important.

    • @carolynklestinec8589
      @carolynklestinec8589 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I did not realize this until recently. So to is the philibuster. I wish the philibuster was not so often abuses but still a very useful tool of import.

    • @cr1m203
      @cr1m203 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bingo!!!!

    • @handyandy8184
      @handyandy8184 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does mob of the minority of the republic mean?

    • @mudslinger888
      @mudslinger888 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Anti democratic! WTP matter, one person one vote.

    • @JM-kq4le
      @JM-kq4le ปีที่แล้ว

      If you read history... You an see that Direct Democracy is oppressive, manipulatable, unstable and ultimate failure prone. I cannot find the word in the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights or the US Constitution. And for very Good reason

  • @mickeywood3012
    @mickeywood3012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The Articles of Confederation created a framework for a central government. "We, the People" create a composite individual, here to represent all mankind. Public feedback has power, it's up to us to keep them honest.

    • @mickeywood3012
      @mickeywood3012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Trailerhood Voodoo Ninja I agree that Jefferson recognized the Magna Carta as one of his building blocks, but I've only seen the internet connects with the Iroquois Papers.

    • @mickeywood3012
      @mickeywood3012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Trailerhood Voodoo Ninja I found the George T. Curtis explanation of the History of our Constitution much more compelling of an argument for the Unique dynamics of our country's founding.

    • @Zanzamor
      @Zanzamor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And how do we plan on doing that when the people we got as our representatives have no sense of the Constitution, bill of rights and the declaration of independence or just don't care, I see very little representatives of state legislature all I see now is a federal Legislatures disguised as state legislatures, the States and its citizens hold all the power and yet we seem to be giving that away to the federal government

    • @mickeywood3012
      @mickeywood3012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Zanzamor People will always turn to their government as an acknowledgment of doing things the right way. This must end. The right way is to recognize the dynamics of a government and how the paperwork is handled. If the dialog is key to world peace, then why isn't the dialog that pertains to world peace more front and center? Media personalities, focus on the dialog get the people nowhere. A school that teaches the dynamics of a government is my proposal, this way all governments attain integrity through the will of the people who want to become involved in politics.

    • @Hard_Right
      @Hard_Right ปีที่แล้ว

      We probably could if everyone didn’t have the “my team is always right” mentality! What’s most hilarious about that mentality is that just like with major sports teams the political parties don’t involve their “fans “ at all , nor do they care about them and the “players” are all the ones making more money than they are worth or deserve to play games ! That being said republicans are more right than demonrats !

  • @josephsadlier6490
    @josephsadlier6490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Very informative. I was impressed that he avoided Pros & Cons of the Constitution and stayed away from the Political Conflicts and views that are abundant today. Very enjoyable to be educated about what the founders tried to invent and direct

    • @lazaroflores1449
      @lazaroflores1449 ปีที่แล้ว

      why can other countries come and buy up land that's near our military bases ? too us it should not be allowed and veiwed as a threat to our country. no other countries should be allowed to do this!call it what you wish but l feel it's not protecting our country . it's a envation on our country and treason.

    • @johnathankennedy1718
      @johnathankennedy1718 ปีที่แล้ว

      aint no try they done it they made the perfect constitution. AMERICA!!!! p.s. when u see shall not be infringed go right to the 14th amendment and read it so u can properly understand what SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED MEANS!!!!!

    • @michahelhamilton-vf7sd
      @michahelhamilton-vf7sd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea...Yup! ...BUT, by THEN, they'd already INFRINGED ON A WHOLE BUNCH OF IT.😮 We NEED teachings that NEVER LEAVE OUT the ORIGINAL ORGANIC 13th Amendment to EVER 'SEE' (BEHOLD) HOW MUCH OF TRULY AMERICAN & GOD-GIVEN INALIABLE/HUMAN RIGHTS are DAILY infringed ON/OVER. UNTIL THERE ARE MASSIVE REPARATIONS AND/OR REVERSALS of THOSE infringements, 'The United States...OF...America cannot ever truly be/become America AGAIN, NOR 'CONTINUE' TO be. ENDLESS MEDIA SOUNDBITES that use U.S.'citizens...and/or...Americans...back & forth in each senseless sentence won't/shall not 'cut it' ; It's only 'LIES', AND 'LOVERS OF LIES' getting American-spirited folks further deceived to put their 'TRUST' in such. LET NO (HU)MAN DECIEVE YOU!❤😊

    • @ZeteticPlato
      @ZeteticPlato 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👍

    • @ZeteticPlato
      @ZeteticPlato 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bill of Rights
      Antifederalist Document
      So is The Declaration of Independence

  • @Aiofaiva.808
    @Aiofaiva.808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I love how this man explained the constitution. Shortcut knowledge. 🙏🙏

  • @kingclover1395
    @kingclover1395 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    He did quite a good job with this, especially when you consider how today we are most often forced to look at the subject through the distorted lens of political correctness and things such as that.

    • @youtubezcy
      @youtubezcy ปีที่แล้ว

      What you call "political correctness" is the most high level media double speak to manipulate your emotions. You're hooked on tabloid politics.

    • @AntiContradiction
      @AntiContradiction ปีที่แล้ว

      What the hell are you even talking about? You people will bring up "political correctness" and being "woke" in any conversation just because you want to complain.
      It's a bogeyman, you're life will never be meaningfully impacted by "political correctness". Just don't be a dick to other people in this country, simple as that.

    • @johndeer8000
      @johndeer8000 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I agree with your statement. I would like to hear him repeat this lecture in this time frame after the last 5 or 6 years.

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I differ a little on that in that we're not forced to but we choose to succumb to the social pressure which has the same end result but is different in a very important way and it's the ownership Factor nobody makes you do the things you do you choose to do them to be accepted by The Herd and that's normal but not necessarily healthy in a lot of cases. Similar to victimhood status which isn't a very empowering position because if all of your problems are someone else's fault you're screwed and more or less powerless to do anything about it because you only have authority over one yourself you can't change others but I think most of the time people don't like to accept the responsibility of their life being completely in their own hands and if they fail it's on them it's just easier to point elsewhere and say they made me fail but I've noticed it's kind of hard not to sometimes that said I'm a stubborn son of a b**** when I want to be and the easiest way to get me to do something is tell me I can't as the only limitations that really hold me back in life are the ones I placed on myself

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheCezza123 I think you must have butt dialed me as google translate does not recognise this as a language

  • @richardcurry7663
    @richardcurry7663 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Thank you for taking the time educate Americans about their country and how important this is.

    • @hh0520
      @hh0520 ปีที่แล้ว

      🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

  • @wayned2097
    @wayned2097 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The biggest problems with teachers, some are really good at talking but not so good with the subject. Others are terrible speakers but are really knowledgeable with the subject making it hard to listen and pay attention too. The final are like this speaker really good at speaking and very knowledgeable of the subject creating a fascinating lecture. Great information.

  • @hollykeefer6103
    @hollykeefer6103 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    This teacher is really good. I wish I had someone like him when I was in school. Very friendly as well.

    • @KeifusMathews3
      @KeifusMathews3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So true~

    • @luiscalcano6541
      @luiscalcano6541 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I had some cooky teachers in elementary , highschool , and college , who were inept conveying the proper info on particular topics , and , also , needed some psychological assistance drastically !

    • @babyrod_
      @babyrod_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@luiscalcano6541 폴 ZAXs ㅊCS Z enX b.ZVBbzn z X👌😎😟🇷🇺👌😎😞😅💀😈🤐💀💀🦊🕺💅😄🙃🕺🥸😖💩🐟😞😃😞🙃😏🧠🤔😊😭👈👅👇👇👇😍💂😄😞🧑‍🚀😄🕺💅👥🎉❤😢😂z😂😢😊😮😮🎉🎉😢🎉😅😮😢😅😂🎉😮😢😂😢😮😊😂😢😢😊😂g😢😢😊😢😮shocked 😂😢😂😂sad 🎉 😂 I 😢😢😂❤is 😊😢😢😊🎉🎉😊🎉😅😅😅😅😊🎉😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅🎉😅😅😅😅😅😅😊 😂😊 😂😊😂😊😅😊😅😊 q😅🎉 🎉😊😮😢😊😊😢remember the 😅😢😂😂😅😮😢😊😅😮❤😊 😢😅phew 😢😢😂😂🎉🎉LOL🎉😂😂🎉😂❤😂🎉😅❤😂🎉😢🎉z❤😢😢🎉😅😅😢😂🎉😮😢😅🎉😮😮😅🎉😊😅🎉😊😊😊😢😊😂😅😊😢😊 and 😅😊😮😊😅😅😅😊 and und 🎉😅😊 u❤😮❤😅🎉😮phew and 😂shocked😅🎉😂😂😢😮❤😮😢😂❤😢😊😮😢😮😮😂😅😮🎉😂🎉😂😂😂 🎉😂😂🎉😢🎉

  • @customisedfitness
    @customisedfitness 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    Needless to say, if anyone wants to understand the subject deeply, the Federalist`s papers is a must! You really have to understand the mindset of Hamilton & Madison.

    • @jeanoverdeer3828
      @jeanoverdeer3828 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      absolutely

    • @jupitercyclops6521
      @jupitercyclops6521 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How many of these guys dualed?
      Legalize dueling , tar & feathering.
      Outlaw qualified immunity & civil asset forfeiture
      Legitimize elections.

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And the entire population too as back then everyone had skin in the game and a lot of it so they were "all in" and everyone's goal was for the country to succeed regardless of what other beliefs they shared or disagreed on

    • @robertlionshield9016
      @robertlionshield9016 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Merry

    • @dr.r.s.steinberg9347
      @dr.r.s.steinberg9347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's ignorant to attempt to appy the midset of Hamilton and Madison and the Federalist's papers, to today's situation.

  • @twj06431021
    @twj06431021 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I loved the delivery and ease of discussion. I will share with my young kids.

  • @digitaldoc1976
    @digitaldoc1976 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Now, THERE'S a true teacher!! He didn't politicize anything. He taught factual and historical data. THANK YOU!! A+, good sir.

  • @WisdomCalls
    @WisdomCalls 4 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    It’s time to brush up on our rights

    • @montneymon-ta-knee6810
      @montneymon-ta-knee6810 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      your rights are what god gives you laws are made to protect them

    • @jodycain2959
      @jodycain2959 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@montneymon-ta-knee6810 ambiguous and fictional.

    • @montneymon-ta-knee6810
      @montneymon-ta-knee6810 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jodycain2959 explain

    • @romanschapter6559
      @romanschapter6559 ปีที่แล้ว

      Excellent Advice to heed.

    • @Yonder27
      @Yonder27 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@montneymon-ta-knee6810
      Prove that God exists without just replying Prove that he/she doesn’t.

  • @megancarroll
    @megancarroll ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This was the city I was born in. Good for you for free civics lessons

  • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
    @Rob337_aka_CancelProof 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The States Constitution should be big and the federal government should be small so that they reflect the relative size of how they were intended to operate.
    It's a constitutional republic of independent confederated States who by design were intended to operate autonomously and with sovereignty.
    This inhibits the consolidation of power through political overreach and keeps the control in the hands of the people right where it should be and through its widespread dispersal minimizes corruption (minimal power equals minimal corruption) and it also rightly imposes on the individual to be responsible as is always best.

    • @megancarroll
      @megancarroll ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sort of…

    • @megancarroll
      @megancarroll ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Like he said our government wasn’t designed to be at the mercy of the individual states.

    • @Hard_Right
      @Hard_Right ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@megancarroll I don’t care what he said , THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE and should still be !

    • @stephaniesmith6643
      @stephaniesmith6643 ปีที่แล้ว

      @RobertELee…: Well said!

    • @howardclegg6497
      @howardclegg6497 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@Hard_Right Exactly. The States were all individual sovereign nations with equal standing too each other and as any other nation state and they still are. The federal government has no sovereignty...only delegated powers as written in the constitution.
      Article VII. The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficiant for the Establishment of the Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same. It is clear the States are Supreme, Sovereign, the Daddy that gave delegated power to enhance the common good and defense. The dirty secret is that the States can eliminate the entire central government and reform new compacts or fly solo.

  • @thevoiceofresonn
    @thevoiceofresonn ปีที่แล้ว +5

    People don't remember that state constitutions we're written before the federal Constitution and many of your rights are listed further in them. Virginia is one of the original ones and very helpful to understanding.

  • @markwriter2698
    @markwriter2698 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you. I haven’t heard these points in years. Wish this video was required in public schools.

  • @trunkmonkey4938
    @trunkmonkey4938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The congress should ignore prior rulings of the court and follow the oath of office.

  • @pamelaforth7820
    @pamelaforth7820 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The 27th Amendment might as well not have been ratified ratified. The Congress gets their money by other means now. This was a marvelous talk on a fascinated subject. Thank you so much for giving us the benefit of your knowledge.

    • @lindadechiazza2924
      @lindadechiazza2924 ปีที่แล้ว

      Back door funds? Dont leave out pres, v.pres and any one else besides congress Dont forgot about it!

  • @beauregardduquesne3831
    @beauregardduquesne3831 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    WOW! I enjoyed this video on our American Constitution! It was the Professor/ Lawyer whom made this very interesting. Almost the same as I learned in the 50’s (late) and early 60’s. I was I had went to Law Schools at Florida State University 😊or in my beloved State of Texas. Go Long Horns 😊 Instead I did the Warrior Class Job of Protecting my beloved country as my Native American and Mountain Man family has done for years.❤

  • @rev.debraj.hopkins7530
    @rev.debraj.hopkins7530 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Fantastic lecture...

  • @irene3940
    @irene3940 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel Constitution is explain so much easier to understand by this Gentlemen,
    how the Constitution works ,
    than when I had this in High-school ,

  • @rabiahmuhammad9683
    @rabiahmuhammad9683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Excellent presentation!!!! Definitely needed this!!!!

  • @klford9499
    @klford9499 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Thank you, I have learned so much. I will listen to this again to see what I missed. I learned about the FCC!

  • @THomasJPeel
    @THomasJPeel ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent lecture. I have a BA political Science from Florida International University (Miami, Florida).1981

  • @MrLikesEverything
    @MrLikesEverything 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Fantastic video and so important for everyone in the US to watch especially right now!!

  • @glenwelch7098
    @glenwelch7098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +223

    Bring the Constitution back to our schools !

    • @mbords01
      @mbords01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Probably to senior centers too as refresher kind of thing.

    • @pattyayers
      @pattyayers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Where did it go? I was taught about it

    • @tinacarpenter4275
      @tinacarpenter4275 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      I suggest bringing the constitutions (2) home. And taking your children as far away from public education schools as you can!!

    • @johnathanballard1304
      @johnathanballard1304 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@pattyayers Luckily I learned about the Constitution in public school in the fall of 2021. So thankfully it is taught in some places at least.

    • @Angela-po7cr
      @Angela-po7cr ปีที่แล้ว

      Its been destroyed by mr. forclosure Donald J Trump
      Under Donald Trump /Joe Biden/shemale Barrack drone Killer Obama..the Selling of Land by Washington County And Tax Office April and Surveyor Scott Young for Mass Foreclosure and Auctions for No One Matters But Thiefs ..welcome to Washington County Auctioning Your House For Mass Profit....your 911 service doesnt work..your dying..beaten cops do not come..they see thief and can arrest them but instead the thief, is praised great job for stealing evidence on land theft..like loved by evil neighbors and crimes honored by crime Trump family Washington County...Zack Morton n Scott Young.. with two phones they stole for evidence was massive gone..google ziply helping keep me from getting income ..with my mortgage paerwork stolen for cops who asked for pin on phones.
      Google errased my evidence on both phones. Plus i was beaten bloody knee by thief cops wont come
      .TED CRUZ in on this with Ron Johnson and Mitch Mconnell. Waste bankrupt your profitting evil jerks

  • @britneybarnaby6195
    @britneybarnaby6195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you sooo much for sharing this teaching.

  • @raymondpiovesan5903
    @raymondpiovesan5903 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Since his show was done do you think now that we should use the 25th for the 46th? Amazing that all of a sudden we don’t hear about the 25th

  • @anthonyberardi3611
    @anthonyberardi3611 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I very much enjoyed this discussion. It definitely refreshed my knowledge of the Constitution.

  • @JCbeatProductions
    @JCbeatProductions ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Much appreciated Professor Katzir!

  • @those1kidds
    @those1kidds 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Great lecture thank you so much for posting this!

    • @lazaroflores1449
      @lazaroflores1449 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      but the constitution is the only reason why we the people rights are not trampled on and the structure of of beautiful country was governor by!

  • @sloboda2012
    @sloboda2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Decepticons always gain your trust with truth, and then use that trust to steer you into believing lies.

    • @shawnmount2685
      @shawnmount2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      "Thus, for instance, the American Government and the American Constitution are spoken of in a manner which would naturally lead the hearer to believe that one is identical with the other; when the truth is, they are distinct in character as is a ship and a compass. The one may point right and the other steer wrong. A chart is one thing, the course of the vessel is another. The Constitution may be right, the Government is wrong. If the Government has been governed by mean, sordid, and wicked passions, it does not follow that the Constitution is mean, sordid, and wicked". Fredrick Douglas 1860

    • @shawnmount2685
      @shawnmount2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @King of Rome, & Earth when you "take liberty" with meaning you change the meaning and change the truth.

  • @charlesshaw9919
    @charlesshaw9919 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    He reminds me of the teacher from Beavis and Butt-Head. The hippie guy who says mm-kay. More folks need to understand what the government's role is. Thank you sir.

    • @Donovan9009
      @Donovan9009 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you thinking of South Park?

    • @charlesshaw9919
      @charlesshaw9919 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Donovan9009 no, that's Mr Mackey. With the big head. "Drugs are just bad um-kay." I was talking about Mr Van-Dreesen from Beavis and Butt-Head. He sings 'Lesbian Seagull' in the movie Beavis and Butt-Head Do America. Do you remember? "Fly high lesbian seagull, settle down and spread your wings". Silly.

    • @Otis-Tank420
      @Otis-Tank420 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mmmmkayyyyy

  • @amarjeetsehmi8995
    @amarjeetsehmi8995 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I went through US constitution with five others of the world in 1965 and find no change in its spirit and commitments.

  • @bradwilliams4921
    @bradwilliams4921 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Rabbi Katzir starts this video with how short the Constitution is compared to State Constitutions. This, along with the fact that the Constitution had to be ratified by the States and the content of the Articles of Confederation makes me think that our founding fathers intended the federal government to be limited and most power to be held by the states.

    • @nasa7352
      @nasa7352 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes except for Mr.Hamilton

    • @TheVeek192
      @TheVeek192 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Duh.

    • @stephaniesmith6643
      @stephaniesmith6643 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Brad Williams: That’s exactly right. The problem is that there’s been attempts to corrupt this balance of power & give the Feds more & more power over the states. It’s NOT a good idea.

  • @scottschiess1440
    @scottschiess1440 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Amazing video. Excellent speaker. The pacing, details, and crowd interaction are fantastic.

  • @madelynef1
    @madelynef1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Very good professor!!

  • @elizabethferrari1346
    @elizabethferrari1346 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent job. Love this gentleman.

  • @SeedsAndStuff
    @SeedsAndStuff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    “Shall not infringe” refers to not removing,altering, or deflecting from the original intent of the constitution that being in the best interest of the person(s) the people. Even with out Jefferson the founding fathers knew that the people in mass wouldn’t be able to understand big picture or would be to self indulgent and selfish or as u just explained with police forcing themselves into homes vicariously or forcing false confessions those both are examples to include illegal seizures or just the working class being to enveloped in the day to day monotony to fully be able maneuver the system or understand it. In a just Society Police would PROTECT the rights of a Person which in Turn protects that Person and leads to Direct deescalation which could then provide said Cilvil servant or officer a moment to teach proper law and why it protects said person police are far removed from this even tho they are what most would consider integral to peace I personally only view them as a component towards seeing as how they have not been acting under the constitution as peace keepers in the best interest of the people.

    • @peteloomis8456
      @peteloomis8456 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can also add the ATF FBI to that list that this administration has let them infringe hard on people's 2A rights and I think Brandon needs to learn what the constitution is and means !

  • @peterthehappywaiguoren
    @peterthehappywaiguoren ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great unbiased, just the facts, presentation. thank you

  • @timothynguyen5171
    @timothynguyen5171 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you for your video.

  • @jacobrobinson175
    @jacobrobinson175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I feel so bad I gave my teacher such a hard time and didn't learn a thing in civics now I wanna learn as much as I can....

  • @miiko9519
    @miiko9519 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I declare Civics, and Prayer is put back in the Unites States School Sysyem in Jesus Name Amen !!!!!

    • @nathanbyrum6765
      @nathanbyrum6765 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So you would be in favor of a law that mandated schools pray to your conception of God--- namely Jesus?

  • @johngalbraith696
    @johngalbraith696 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved it & thank you for taking the time. Will be looking for more from you in the future. Again, Great Job & Thanks.

  • @billgreenidge6740
    @billgreenidge6740 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    What is the name of this professor? That was an excellent lecture!

  • @williammaldonado6132
    @williammaldonado6132 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Outstanding! 👍🇺🇸

  • @craigmiller1533
    @craigmiller1533 6 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    One of the most inspired and ingenious parts of the constitution is the electoral college. Meant to keep us as free as possible. Prevents tyranny by the majority, and preserves STATES RIGHTS in the presidency.

    • @aundriamarshall3187
      @aundriamarshall3187 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      tyranny of the majority?? you mean the power of the people?! the electoral college needs to go!!!

    • @ChristieBass1979
      @ChristieBass1979 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      So what you're saying is you want to give the lower states slaves again....

    • @baxterkavan8425
      @baxterkavan8425 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      aundria marshall you must be from California? Or New York? you need to listen to what this guy is saying. Without the electoral college New York and LA would decide every major political decision. Nobody wants that cuz those who grow up in high population areas don’t get good educations.

    • @deathlarsen7502
      @deathlarsen7502 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@aundriamarshall3187 you are a liberal moron and no man will touch you

    • @jockinw
      @jockinw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      One person
      One vote
      Electoral College is ridiculous

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    History : Thank you Rabbi Hillel Katzir for a thorough lecture of Civics on the U.S Constitution.

  • @MAJESTIC-SU9
    @MAJESTIC-SU9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The key phrase in 4th amendment to protect unwarranted search thru our cellphones is in the term referred to as "EFFECTS" for which suggests personal items once made or brought into our existence as life progressed and we acquired new creations of man

  • @lorettascott5477
    @lorettascott5477 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow that's it's awesome that you can explain this for Joe smo thank you it's been so confusing lately!! 😌

  • @plumbcrazy4391
    @plumbcrazy4391 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I want this professor to give us another civics lesson now .

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Impeachment is the recall. If a state or federal official violates their oath of office(violate the constitution) it Is supposed to be immediate removal they are trespassers of their offices.

  • @lorrycamill6502
    @lorrycamill6502 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This teacher is a blessing you need wisdom to run a nation or else you have a jungle God bless him 🇺🇸☮️🙏👍

  • @dayz4030
    @dayz4030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you Professor nice lecture

  • @remusarizona2178
    @remusarizona2178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You want to understand the real constitution, take a few classes, even online, in political science, the history of constitutional governance etc. before glomming onto this silliness;discussed here.

  • @bickie603
    @bickie603 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this this teacher one of the best.

  • @matthewwithum8372
    @matthewwithum8372 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well taught Sir.

  • @patrickhenckell2051
    @patrickhenckell2051 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Clearly this speaker is very educated and he knows how to present the Constitution but the best part of this is where he keeps saying “we’ll have to find out so stay tuned” lol

  • @veralynnsapp9888
    @veralynnsapp9888 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Every one should see this

    • @proudamerican7662
      @proudamerican7662 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Every American should, but we don't, therefore, government does what the people (lobbyists & special interests, strength in numbers) who do watch, listen, and hold elected officials to task or twist the arm of elected officials.

    • @marymusicandvlogs
      @marymusicandvlogs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Honestly I’m 24 and having to research this because I’m joining the Navy, and I have no clue what I’m defending. It’s sad! I never got this knowledge when I was in school, but hey I know about slavery. 😒

    • @hrdcoreme
      @hrdcoreme 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mary you nailed that point. They teach what they don’t want ppl to forget or let go of.

    • @LilKidAttacker
      @LilKidAttacker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right now more than ever.

  • @joannthomases9304
    @joannthomases9304 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Juris prudence, is the conscience of the law, and is the guide. Enjoyed Carl Miller's work, as well. Bill of rights.

  • @Yitreaux
    @Yitreaux ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just relistened to one of the summary lecture on the Constitution and their analysis and the Fort Collins lecture I think I’ll read The Declaration and the Constitution and maybe the Articles of Confederation and the Iroquois/Algonquin Confederation also. Sweet dreams

  • @rusdayatiidrus5401
    @rusdayatiidrus5401 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Most teachers in USA are like this simply because they r professional n r proud of their profession. This is one of the reasons why they constitute a hugely powerful nation.

  • @realtalk7547
    @realtalk7547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video. On the part where he discusses obstruction of Justice, would his definition or any rational definition include a presidential pardon? It stops Justice cold in its tracks. So much of that is interpretational and allows a belligerent political opposition party to accuse and muddle up the wheels of one’s administration. Why would they not do this to be dirty?

  • @bickie603
    @bickie603 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you and god bless

  • @unforgivablyme2243
    @unforgivablyme2243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Idk if any one else noticed but article 1 section 10 was put on the screen but wasn't talked about. Check it out again.

  • @leaderone9324
    @leaderone9324 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There was a prayerfulness that contributed to the wisdom of the constitution coming about . Say what you want but this country has been under the same constitution 230 plus yrs unlike most nations whose constitutions average 17yrs and or a violent revolution ( we've had only one ) every generation or so

  • @charlescarmichael1124
    @charlescarmichael1124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The 2A is extremely clear. The first part is the REASON for the second part. When you consider that the militia in the first part is made up of the people of the second part, you understand that all gun regulations are unconstitutional. “Well regulated” at the time meant, in good working order.
    You cannot create a militia from a bunch of unarmed citizens.
    And no, militias were not made of the National Guard. That wasn’t formed till the 1900’s

    • @cr1m203
      @cr1m203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bingo!!!!!

    • @deathfan2002
      @deathfan2002 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tell that to all the politicians taking our rights away with these bullshit gun laws!

    • @bobbyraejohnson
      @bobbyraejohnson ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bingo!

    • @barrywhite1770
      @barrywhite1770 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly. The first part is all about the security of the state. The only reason people should have guns is so that the state can form them into a militia to defend the security of the state.

    • @nickl781
      @nickl781 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has nothing to do with the state forming them into a militia. Every citizen is the militia. That's why it says the peoples right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Every reference to the phrase "the people" in the constitution, or any other founding document, refers to every citizen, same as this reference does. It is not talking about specific groups. Every citizen is the militia, that's why the government has no right to infringe on the right to own firearms. The well regulated part of the constitution is not talking about regulating firearms or the type of firearms people can have. Since the people are the militia, the well regulated part is another way of saying a well disciplined or well functioning people. A people proficient with the use of firearms. The purpose of every citizen owing firearms and knowing how to use them, is so we can be ready at a moments notice, to defend ourselves against all attackers, whether they be foreign or, as we have today, a tyrannical government here at home.

  • @michaelkolb7737
    @michaelkolb7737 ปีที่แล้ว

    every citizen of this world should should see this!

  • @jasonrussell4378
    @jasonrussell4378 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where on the internet can you find an annotated version of the constitution?

  • @jacksoncz8536
    @jacksoncz8536 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Mostly well done, didn't mention that since radification was based on the writing of a bill of rights If anyone of the parts of the bill of rights is destroyed the Constitution is nullified
    Secondly the meaning of well regulated, a rifle or musket is well regulated when it can hit the target Washington had complained about the lack of firearms being regulated when militias showed up It does not mean that the government has any right to write laws regarding firearms

    • @commonsense.1014
      @commonsense.1014 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does well regulated mean to you?
      You do realize we now have grooved barrels, standard issue riffles.

  • @campbellbailey9614
    @campbellbailey9614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I like this man he's nice.

    • @juliajodon
      @juliajodon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My thoughts exactly

  • @marwaninterviews9946
    @marwaninterviews9946 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing, please, invite him for more lecturers 👍👍👍

  • @ApplesOranges123
    @ApplesOranges123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    excellent, thanks

  • @randystogner5466
    @randystogner5466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Does the CDC's recent moratorium on eviction violate Fifth Amendment Rights of property owners, also, how can the CDC get away with making a law since they're not Congress

    • @tracybarhite1764
      @tracybarhite1764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought the Supreme Court ruled that was illegal. Not sure though?

    • @TheEtbetween
      @TheEtbetween 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tracybarhite1764 yes they ruled it was illegal

    • @TheEtbetween
      @TheEtbetween 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People will start getting evicted Very Soon!

  • @toddolson573
    @toddolson573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As it is said, to be a soverign you have to be free from any form of control, and be governed by yourself. One can not be this if they claim to be a citizen for a citizen is a slave to the state. You can not be a soverign citizen and be free to choose, this is absurb and creates conflict within the meaning.

    • @Ben-gv5nz
      @Ben-gv5nz ปีที่แล้ว

      Man is sovereign.not a sovereign citizens.that make you a corporate fiction.from the birth certificate the u.s. corporation made you a corporate fiction.put a bond on that certificate.so they can make money from the bond.in any court you are a corporate fiction or citizen.that mean you are not a flesh and blood man or woman.identy theft.
      You to represent the corporate fiction person they made in law.statues is not law that why they write so many statues to charge people more money.
      The law the right to travel.they change it to a privalige.the lawyer that teaching the class ask him if he have a foreign registration statement and foreign certificate of participation and a anti bribery statement.he have to have those statements because he works for Pope Francis like all the congressman judges lawyer policeman work for a foreign corporation that own by Pope Francis.28usc2003 is a federal corporation and not a government.
      They work for the Pope not you.

    • @volume10industries...24_7
      @volume10industries...24_7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right on!
      Then there's Washington DC. Sovereign, not part of the USA.Yet owned by England, which is owned by the Vatican. All sovereign territories.

  • @lisa4264
    @lisa4264 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The integrity of our democracy is at risk as long as our nation waits until students are in 11th grade to teach government instead of introducing it on a gradient along with math, reading, and science. A child can learn how their hometown develops along with ABC and 123. And why wouldn’t we start as early as possible to teach this when it is practically the ground we walk on, the quality of life we determine, and shapes the decisions we make as adults.
    Understanding the structure of the government system is what prepares our children for adulthood and living on their own. Early courses begin with City Works and by 11th and 12th grade they study Our Nation and relativity to other countries, Every state in America needs to change the educational curriculum by introducing lessons in government as a mandatory course every semester, every year just like math, reading, and science.
    Lately, I often hear politicians and reporting media speak of protecting our "sacred" democracy, but when this country (and seems purposely) omits building block lessons from mandatory education that span over 13 years of the fundamental development of “we the people”, logic would dictate to seriously consider the root cause for the threat to our democracy is the omission of useful knowledge in government. Constituents need to be able to participate beyond casting a vote or understand enough to recognize misinformation. It should be the structure under which we live, not the system that we live under.
    Right now here misinformation intensifies feelings of hopelessness in the absence of knowledge of government structure. Seems to be a noticeable trend that the sons and daughters of congressmen are filling seats in the White House. Why?. They grow up with it. Quite a contrast to what the common student is exposed to. Nepotism will breed only contempt for the "masses" and vice versa. For the record kids groan at the idea of any mandatory course they receive, I expect the lessons in government will receive the same from a kid, however, I can't help but believe most will like it for the satisfaction it brings to answering the question, "WHY?"
    I challenge every mayor of every city, every governor of every state, and every congressman that has a seat in the White House”, if Democracy is so important, start cultivating constituents that can recognize disinformation and will grow to have the same opportunity as your children who are exposed to it every day. It’s not the swamp that needs to be drained, it’s the gene pool that needs to be expanded. Let us in by revamping the educational curriculum K through 12.

  • @bocook6167
    @bocook6167 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Just to add: I wondered if the riots in DC would have happened if the electoral college had settled election? Not courts.

    • @SB-vl3ws
      @SB-vl3ws 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They definitely still would have happened.
      Trump's loss was clear and decisive, but some people still believe him and think that it was stolen because they are gullible.
      Biden won by the electoral college, the courts were only necessary because die hard trump supporters believed trump over the facts.

    • @southerndualsport3827
      @southerndualsport3827 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SB-vl3ws So, the 70,000 erroneous votes discovered in Maricopa county ALONE just don't matter? They LITERALLY have 70,000 MORE votes than WERE SENT OUT by the state! By the way, that is just the tip of the iceberg because Trump lost Arizona by a mere 10k votes!

    • @SB-vl3ws
      @SB-vl3ws 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@southerndualsport3827 except that what you're talking about never happened.
      The joke of an audit in Arizona has not found anything nor will they.
      They're delaying releasing what their final report they're trying to find something and they have not been able to.
      They know that once they admit that they've found nothing it breaks their "rigged election" narrative, which you bought hook, line, and sinker.
      Where did you hear 70000 votes?
      Not only have they not found anything, but they have it announced finding anything.
      Do you even read the news or just make it up to support your ridiculous beliefs?

    • @southerndualsport3827
      @southerndualsport3827 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SB-vl3ws They officially released the 70,000 vote count, try watching some real news, its everywhere except on leftist media because they don't want you to think they cheated. BUT THEY DID.

    • @SB-vl3ws
      @SB-vl3ws 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@southerndualsport3827
      You are hilariously brainwashed
      There are tons of articles on both left, right, and centrist news sites.
      ALL OF THEM confirm that the Arizona audit has publicly found nothing, and if they have found something, they certainly haven't announced it yet.
      You are so obsessed with proving your narrative that you don't even care about the truth anymore.
      Your supposed audit was supposed to only take a couple of weeks, and here we are months later as you grasp it straws trying to prove an obviously false claim. It's all coming back to bite you and you're still choosing to go down with the ship.
      Trump supporters are just a circus supporting their clown.
      www.dailylocal.com/news/national/that-didnt-happen-daniel-dale-fact-checks-arizona-audit-claims/video_ecb3c721-aeb7-5069-b358-0980c2297fe2.amp.html

  • @bridgebridge3840
    @bridgebridge3840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Noticed how he skipped over "title of nobility"... apparently put into the constitution before the Louisiana purchase by Napoleon Bonaparte...lol.

    • @bridgebridge3840
      @bridgebridge3840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I believe most of this is interpretation and opinions.

  • @huntersmoon2351
    @huntersmoon2351 ปีที่แล้ว

    We need an update on the amendments.

  • @Godisgracious85
    @Godisgracious85 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m preparing now to help my homeschool high schoolers on this subject ❤

  • @shawnmount2685
    @shawnmount2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    "I'm from California" explains why he took GREAT liberty in defining the Constitution under his personal "interpretation". Voting was for "white, male and property owners". In 1777 Vermont in their Constitution baned slavery out right and at the same time gave voting rights to all Black men. Prior to the end of the Civil War 5 States allowed Black men voting rights. The 3/5 clause countered the higher populated States of the south "for purpose of representation" enslaved people only counted as 3/5. So States like Vermont and Pennsylvania after 1789 all free Black men counted as one. Fredrick Douglas addresses those who go outside the words of The Constitution to define it in his 1860 speech given in Glasgow Scottland.

    • @minnesotamarine9861
      @minnesotamarine9861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can tell his positioning when he said that he didn't want to say his position on the impeachment or possible impeachment of president trump. He fell for everything Hook line and sinker that the media and the Hillary campaign was feeding everybody in the nation. I had to stop watching this at 42 minutes and 38 seconds, he's not trustworthy.

    • @cr1m203
      @cr1m203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@minnesotamarine9861 he’s very trustworthy and you just proved his point about “pros and cons” something you’re doing now. He broke down impeachment and when it was used and how it was used. Where did he lie at? Andrew Jackson was impeached and so was Clinton. 2017 Trump would’ve been covered under pros and cons. So thank you for proving his point.

    • @cr1m203
      @cr1m203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You just proved his point and he said he was not going to get into all of that. You’re comparing a state Constitution to a the United States one. Every state has their own Constitution something he said right from the start. Your comment that may be correct would’ve fell under “pros and cons” he was not using his views he was using the views of the 1700s and mid 1800s I mean he was not wrong no matter what state he is from. He also addressed how stuff was changing along the lines. Remember women didn’t have a right to vote either like they do now.

    • @shawnmount2685
      @shawnmount2685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cr1m203 Totalitarian nationalism isn't what was the vision of the founders but it is the vision of fascist nation States like 1930s Italy. It would require elected despotism/ tyrrany of those in the national government. The EU operates more like how the founders envisioned the United States. 25 separate "states" governing thier people domestically. The EU only acts as a "collective" bargaining entity when it comes to foreign relations and trade.

    • @cr1m203
      @cr1m203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@shawnmount2685 well what I can agree with you on is they didn’t envision today because it looks like British all over again.

  • @jeto32
    @jeto32 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    what physical materials were provided on the back table to take a deeper dive? Do you suggest specific texts for those who want to read further?

  • @mvg75
    @mvg75 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We America people are free and all is abundant having no concept of a human dominance over others or greed.

  • @ks8435
    @ks8435 ปีที่แล้ว

    where can i find a pocket constitution and does it have the whole thing?

  • @warren286
    @warren286 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The 2nd amendment is pretty fucking clear. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is not overruled by the prefitory clause that a militia is necessary to protect a state.
    It was written that way so that every day people, being armed already, can be quickly gathered to form a militia. This was because, even though the war of independence was won, there were still British forces on our soil, as well as other foreign powers who could exert their will by force, namely France and Spain. It's also because our forefathers were still debating whether or not to have and keep a standing Army. Many were even opposed to the idea. Which is why we came up with the draft.

    • @ancelrick5396
      @ancelrick5396 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's fantastic.. Then the US should do a way with a standing army. Think of the Trillions of dollars saved and every one would have an AK in the closet. That sounds GREAT!!!! FREEDOM!!!!

  • @robertbisard463
    @robertbisard463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The 16th amendment was passed by the government but was never ratified by the states there for Amendment 16 income tax 1913 does not apply to any one of us

    • @buddhangle
      @buddhangle 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Robert Bisard you rightwing libertarians have a precarious grasp of reality.

    • @robertbisard463
      @robertbisard463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@buddhangle , right-wing? What are you talkin about? This is history! Facts! Goes to show you don't even know what you're talking about cuz I don't even vote, cuz your vote don't count. And if he actually did a little study and you would find that to be the the case. In fact you're like every other Democrat and Republican who is delusional in thinking that there is the difference between the two. Because that's what they want you to think. It's a military strategy, divide and conquer. but for someone like you who wants to buy into the system is going to have a hard time understanding this.

    • @buddhangle
      @buddhangle 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertbisard463 Are you implying that you're a left-libertarian? I don't see evidence for that.
      If votes didn't count, why would so much clandestine work be put into suppressing votes and hacking elections?
      I agree with you that Dem & Rep are both heads of the Big Business party. We require critical thinking and emotional balance to approach the biggest issues facing us.

    • @robertbisard463
      @robertbisard463 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@buddhangle , thank you for your reply! No I am not saying I'm left libertarian either. As I mentioned I don't vote at all for either side, as far as spending money on trying to stop voter fraud, it's like any other legislation, they're just trying to create an issue so they can steal our money. Most problems that the government says we have today, are not problems at all they're just issues, created by the government in mainstream TV to scare people into giving up their money and freedom. if anyone would do any research on any of these things, true research, they'd find that many of these issues or not issues at all. For instance just walk outside your door and see if these issues are really happening in your day-to-day life. I find that for me and for her pretty much everybody I know no one seems to think we have as many problems as a government thinks we do. Anyone who buys into this system of government I feel sorry for them.

    • @buddhangle
      @buddhangle 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertbisard463 There's definitely money to be made in conflict, and conflict drives the modern economy. We all owe it to ourselves to learn to be provide for ourselves, but I don't believe we should all be insular but should teach and support one another to be autonomous individuals and empowered collectives.
      Regarding your initial statement on 16th amendment not being ratified, are you arguing from the position William J. Benson and Martin J. "Red" Beckman espoused in their 1985 book on the matter? Because their has been extensively proven to be dishonest and not representative of the fact that the 16th amendment was indeed legitimately ratified.

  • @DeniseSkinner68DeniseSkinner68
    @DeniseSkinner68DeniseSkinner68 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does the privacy act coincide with the Constitution? Or are they separate and fed? Especially a with medical privacy end or performing medical problemedical programs. Secret or otherwise upon people without them knowing.

  • @cr1m203
    @cr1m203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The EC is more important today than it has ever been. Why should New York and California pick our Presidents based on population? I noticed Obama wasn’t mentioned in this yet Al was and Hilary was. So how was it that Obama won the popular vote and the EC twice but Hilary and Al couldn’t? People want the federal popular vote because the larger states can win it easy. Well Obama proved you can win both so that means more states wanted him since he won both.

  • @onlythewise1
    @onlythewise1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    country only as good as its people not its laws

  • @avideorecord3585
    @avideorecord3585 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 1:15:00 - Cruel and unusual to only be between the state and the defendant seems to be missing... an unbiased jury of piers. The judge is a state actor who is paid a wage delivered through taxation creating strong incentive for abuse. A jury of peers is likely the only credible judge of what should be considered cruel and unusual.
    Thank you for the presentation!!

  • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
    @Rob337_aka_CancelProof 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which Constitution is the correct one? I understand there are just one or two words that differ (like for and of) but which is official if it were to come down to one being correct and the other wrong because of differences in interpretation of some seemingly insignificant prepositions

    • @tinacarpenter4275
      @tinacarpenter4275 ปีที่แล้ว

      To my understanding the first original is the correct one that most people I know believe us to be under. While the 2nd is although illegal it is the one that is referred to today. This is MY BELIEF and my thoughts on your question. Very few are even aware of there being 2.

    • @Rob337_aka_CancelProof
      @Rob337_aka_CancelProof ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tinacarpenter4275 that is the way I heard it too

  • @JustTayo
    @JustTayo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    All it took was one Pandemic to Nullify this beautiful document.

    • @gemsoftheheart
      @gemsoftheheart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nullify?

    • @JustTayo
      @JustTayo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@gemsoftheheart the Bill of rights, policing people's freedom, arresting people for protesting...

    • @gemsoftheheart
      @gemsoftheheart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about the Bill of rights?

    • @chgsf03
      @chgsf03 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FYI bill of rights and constitution are not equal nor the same....

    • @carolynklestinec8589
      @carolynklestinec8589 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And a bunch of socialism/collectivism minded people who have been brainwashed

  • @JohnDoe-mk6dw
    @JohnDoe-mk6dw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    And the second amendment is in fact pretty clear. The bill of rights were for the protection of the people's rights. It is idiotic to suggest that it is not pretty clear what the interpretation is, especially considering the history of weapons in the United States and the purpose of said bill of rights. Also, if you read the constitution, it is pretty clear of whom it is talking about. It directs specific branches and persons it is talking to. In article 1, it specifically calls for the senate or House respectively, as it calls for the president in article 2. The bill of rights is meant for the people, so when the second amendment days "the right of the people, it literally means the people. It is not meant to be rocket science. The second amendment is not "clearer" because the founders did not think it was necessary to be any clearer, as they just fought off an increasingly tyrannical government, they had no interest in a standing army. That argument has no legal basis. It needs to die.

    • @quantvminquizitor
      @quantvminquizitor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Every word in our founding document was given very careful consideration before was penned, and as such It was kept as simple as possible precisely so that we the people, even the illiterate, would understand it, and not be misconstrued.

  • @juliasizemore715
    @juliasizemore715 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @pearlsnivy1569
    @pearlsnivy1569 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dude if you were teaching my class you'd be our favorite

  • @campbellbailey9614
    @campbellbailey9614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The constitution is relatively short thank god.

    • @LucretiusDraco
      @LucretiusDraco 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wouldn't necessarily thank god pretty sure we can b thankful to beings that actually lived lol

  • @vertigohan
    @vertigohan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What are your thoughts about the lockdown? Is it unconstitutional?

    • @fortcollinsgov
      @fortcollinsgov  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We'll leave the interpretation of the constitution to Rabbi Hillel Katzir, and if you'd like to get in touch and see what he thinks, you can reach out to the Poudre River Public Library, who featured him in this series. Thanks!

    • @aaronbarnes2550
      @aaronbarnes2550 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes the Constitution gives the federal government the power to promote the general welfare which this includes and the provide for the common defense

    • @adamhutchison4738
      @adamhutchison4738 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Many aspects of lockdown is unconstitutional with dictation of essential versus non essential businesses. There is a perspective of letting people take responsibility (including businesses on policy on entering stores) as well as the other side of the coin where you have an invisible threat that kills the unsuspecting or ignorant victims. The key is effects; weighing life and death and economic devestation. It's easy from outside perspectives from all us non elected officials. We do have the benefit of weighing what countries have tried and their outcomes - this is why not sharing real data (inflatig or, and deflating data) for pride or deceit - regardless reasons - is as dangerous and destructive as a real attack.

    • @johnree6106
      @johnree6106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aaronbarnes2550 Actually the lockdown would be unconstitutional, the constitution is a document that limits the government. Now there is federal and state laws and the funny thing is that a national lockdown is not possible it is state by state this was to prevent the federal government from shut down of states. The thing is as we do have the right to assemble and a few other areas in the constitution that makes stay at home order legal. It doesn't mean it's not good advice but a legal enforceable order it's not.

    • @MrSmith-eg7oh
      @MrSmith-eg7oh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes