Decay is activated when "touching" things, their "decay" spreads to "nearby"... "objects" Zero Gravity is activated when "touching" things, their "zero gravity state" spreads to "nearby"... "objects" Both are just magic. But Decay apparently interacts with inanimate objects in a "realistic" manner. This video is utter garbage, I have no idea what your opinion even is.
@@driveghost1996 Yes, Explosive Sweat could theoretically exist in a real animal in the real world but your examples of "good quirks" also included complete fantasy magic like Zero Gravity, Superpower and Overhaul, which are not physically possible. Even in the case of even Explosion, Bakugo is immune to his own explosions for some reason, so even that example doesn't really make sense as "biological" functions. Watch your own video. It's just listing quirks you like and quirks you dislike. That's pretty dogshit content.
Quirks are biological in the sense that they arise from one's inborn nature and can be inherited genetically, but there was *never* any assumption that they were strictly bound to one's physical form. That was simply an incorrect assumption on your part. I think it's pretty easy to compare Quirks which deal with normally intangible properties like gravity and time to psychic powers in other stories. Psychic powers are similarly a result of one's inborn nature, they just have to do with the brain and exertions of will rather than taking a direct physical action with one's body.
I am surprised New order isn't on the list because THAT is straight up magic. New order is in a tier of it's own quirk wise, it is essentially softcore reality warping through contact and speech. Nighteye you could b.s and say, it's essentially nighteye looking at something and the mind running through multiple simulations in a momentfor the most likely future scenario. Seeing as the future can be changed, you can b.s that into a logical explanation. And then in battle it's essentially just precognition. Eri could be some weird ability where she essentially releases energy as a conduit to reverse the bodily processes.
Quirk singularity also plays a key factor in this system. Its how Bakugo got Explosion. One parent secretes nitroglycerin the other can vaporize their sweat. Put them together and you got combustion. Eventually everyone on the planet will be able to warp reality at will and do this that would even impress Dr. Manhattan.
One issue though is that Quirks seem to have more than just a biological function There does seem to be a concept of a spirit and it should be noted that even in the MHA verse, they don't have a perfect understanding of quirks. And that in itself actually makes perfect sense. Quirks are still technically a new power in their world.... hasn't even been 100 years... One of the earliest quirk users is still alive and isn't unlivably old....
@@benshulz4179 It isn't that it makes sense, it is that it is inconsistent. Calling a pizza a sandwich is kinda stretching the definition of a sandwich a bit, while calling a pizza a soup makes no sense at all. Hopefully that helps you understand a bit better friend.
@@odininmeemninido1498 from the get-go there's slime people and other completely wacky powers. This video didn't make any point, stop trying to tell yourself it did.
@@tehandeh That's a better explanation tbh Though there is a quote in the Manga about them "not being magic" then you got Night eye literally looking into the future lol. That part specifically is what the vid was about
Nighteyes can easily be explained by just saying he can see the 4th dimension And Aries taking some sort of energy makes a little bit of sense just in the way that reversing something in time would take a lot of energy and its explained that she needs to build that up over time so she can do it but she can't do it constantly because it drains her.
As I said in the vid, Quirks aren't a bad power system And there are a lot of very similar power systems across fiction, so I don't think creating one that's similar to others is a bad thing
The access to the power is biological. That doesn’t mean that the power itself needs to be realistically explained from a biological viewpoint. This feels very obvious to me
![[MV] A leap of faith...ความเชื่อใจครั้งสุดท้าย (From "Petrichor the series")](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U1piZH2CNXA/mqdefault.jpg)
I've noticed a lot of times, the audio kind of skips or bugs out, I think that's because my Potato computer lags when I use my Recording Software.
Decay is activated when "touching" things, their "decay" spreads to "nearby"... "objects"
Zero Gravity is activated when "touching" things, their "zero gravity state" spreads to "nearby"... "objects"
Both are just magic. But Decay apparently interacts with inanimate objects in a "realistic" manner.
This video is utter garbage, I have no idea what your opinion even is.
@benshulz4179 I was just talking about how some Quirks don't fit the original description of how Quirks work, while bringing up some examples.
@@driveghost1996 Yes, Explosive Sweat could theoretically exist in a real animal in the real world but your examples of "good quirks" also included complete fantasy magic like Zero Gravity, Superpower and Overhaul, which are not physically possible.
Even in the case of even Explosion, Bakugo is immune to his own explosions for some reason, so even that example doesn't really make sense as "biological" functions.
Watch your own video. It's just listing quirks you like and quirks you dislike. That's pretty dogshit content.
Quirks are biological in the sense that they arise from one's inborn nature and can be inherited genetically, but there was *never* any assumption that they were strictly bound to one's physical form. That was simply an incorrect assumption on your part. I think it's pretty easy to compare Quirks which deal with normally intangible properties like gravity and time to psychic powers in other stories. Psychic powers are similarly a result of one's inborn nature, they just have to do with the brain and exertions of will rather than taking a direct physical action with one's body.
Thank you.
I am surprised New order isn't on the list because THAT is straight up magic. New order is in a tier of it's own quirk wise, it is essentially softcore reality warping through contact and speech.
Nighteye you could b.s and say, it's essentially nighteye looking at something and the mind running through multiple simulations in a momentfor the most likely future scenario. Seeing as the future can be changed, you can b.s that into a logical explanation. And then in battle it's essentially just precognition.
Eri could be some weird ability where she essentially releases energy as a conduit to reverse the bodily processes.
Tbh I forgot about New Order, but yeah that's a perfect example
Quirk singularity also plays a key factor in this system. Its how Bakugo got Explosion.
One parent secretes nitroglycerin the other can vaporize their sweat. Put them together and you got combustion.
Eventually everyone on the planet will be able to warp reality at will and do this that would even impress Dr. Manhattan.
Great. Which of the quirks is keeping him from blowing his arms off?
Huh... yeah YEAH you make a really good point for Sir nighteye , that one doesn't make sense the more you think about it
That was around when I really started to question some Quirks, though at the time I thought it was the only one that didn't fit
One issue though is that Quirks seem to have more than just a biological function
There does seem to be a concept of a spirit and it should be noted that even in the MHA verse, they don't have a perfect understanding of quirks.
And that in itself actually makes perfect sense.
Quirks are still technically a new power in their world.... hasn't even been 100 years...
One of the earliest quirk users is still alive and isn't unlivably old....
I have no idea why time travel as a superpower is less believable than inhumane strength, both are unfeasible and biologically impossible.
The point is, one is just making your body stronger, while one is literally interacting with the Spacetime Continuum
@@driveghost1996Yes, so?
@@benshulz4179 It isn't that it makes sense, it is that it is inconsistent.
Calling a pizza a sandwich is kinda stretching the definition of a sandwich a bit, while calling a pizza a soup makes no sense at all. Hopefully that helps you understand a bit better friend.
@@odininmeemninido1498 from the get-go there's slime people and other completely wacky powers.
This video didn't make any point, stop trying to tell yourself it did.
I feel when they said biological they meant genetic-based mike their version of mutants. and not biological as tied to their physical body perse.
@@tehandeh That's a better explanation tbh
Though there is a quote in the Manga about them "not being magic" then you got Night eye literally looking into the future lol. That part specifically is what the vid was about
Nighteyes can easily be explained by just saying he can see the 4th dimension
And Aries taking some sort of energy makes a little bit of sense just in the way that reversing something in time would take a lot of energy and its explained that she needs to build that up over time so she can do it but she can't do it constantly because it drains her.
Xmen arguably has the exact same problem.
You have mutations like "'look likke a chicken"
then you have "no more mutants"
True. At least with X-Men there's the expectation that Marvel gets weird a lot
Is it a problem if my power system is similar to Quirks? Its like Quirks mixed with pokemon
As I said in the vid, Quirks aren't a bad power system
And there are a lot of very similar power systems across fiction, so I don't think creating one that's similar to others is a bad thing
The access to the power is biological. That doesn’t mean that the power itself needs to be realistically explained from a biological viewpoint.
This feels very obvious to me
Nahh bro really made a video about MHA 💀also 0 views and likes in a few sec? U felld off ong ong
Lol