@LOCAL COPE You are blaming the Jews! Thats inane, immature and calling yourself a victim. Its our fault if we vote poor representatives into power. Socialists can only stay in power if they create victims and break up homogenous societies. If you buy into that Victim mentality, then blame yourself. The "Not having enough kids" narrative can be solved quite easily by creating incentives for ones own population to have children.
@@isongalolo No, Vince - we have all the evidence to prove exactly this. Of course it's the jews - jews ARE the socialists who are behind it. But then you're one, so of course you come up with every ridiculous argument you can think of to distract from the facts.
@@thirdghost8887 : Let's imagine, just for one crazy moment, that you have a point; Don't you think that the actual perpetrators, should be held culpable in some shape or form, or are you just so he'll bent on blaming the Jews for EVERYTHING, that you can't see past your own prejudice?
@fredricksickelbower9431 : Simple! Grow some goodwill, and just get out of your prideful, hateful echo chamber of falsehood, and start learning about Islam and its tenets. The world will be a less scary place. I promise you!
A nation is the largest functioning political block. It is comprised of smaller states and then counties and then cities and then communities and then churches and organizations and then families. Each of these is a voting block and individual power increases the further down the line you go. It is not at all clear that democracy works well at a national level because it is so easy to subvert at that level. Multicultural nations face the greatest headwinds towards peace and progress and problem solving because they don't have a common language, morality or look. Inviting differing cultures into your nation increases discord and reduces even more the usefulness of democracy as a means of governing. To be a Japanese citizen, both of your parents must be born Japanese, you must understand and speak fluent Japanese as your native language and you must "act" Japanese. That is how it should be everywhere. None of that deprives anybody of the joy of experiencing other cultures, learning other languages or appreciating other views. It simply lets you do it in the comfort of your own culture.
The line of non-Christians trying to get into countries built on Judeo-Christian values is limitless. The line of Christians and Jews trying to get into non-Christians does not exist. The fact is that cultures have developed independently over many centuries and the notion that within a matter of years multiculturism will work, is naive, dangerous and nonsensical. Nothing good will come from forcing Jews, Christians and Hindus to live with or accommodate Muslims. The religion of Islam prohibits coexistence with other ideologies and therefore, the liberal globalist ideology of forcing this to happen will end in war.
I think when you go to a house that does not belong to you, you had better knock on the door and request permission to enter, before you do... (then conduct yourself as a proper guest should) otherwise, don't act all surprised when people start shooting at you. [period]
"Multi racialism could work if we just had the guts to drop the curtain on this useless and misinterpreted catch phrase, 'Multi culturalism'. It is these cultures, not individuals or races, which are the problems when it comes to passive integration. Let's encourage multi racialism under one unified system which enables us to celebrate all individuals diverse heritage and dispose of those cultures which are permiating and wrecking every known society today with their archaic, brutal, misogynistic and radicaly tribal, brainwashed beliefs."
Hungary has defied the EU by erecting fences. For such a small country they felt they were being overwhelmed. Angela Merkel is being blamed for her early on open borders policy. Sweden and Denmark is looking to deport some. Brexit is rooted in what's being described as an invasion but for want of appearing politically correct they say its about trade not migration.
I do not like when I cannot see someones face, personal issue, hell it could be a man, how can anyone walk around in trust. Besides my personal issue, if police need to id you, you better be willing to unwrap your face or go to jail until you are proven innocent. People who want to get away with something will start using that to illude. It is common sense.
Jim, the burka has no relevance in true Islam. The burka was worn by Arabs in the desert to protect their faces against sandstorms. It is men in Islam that have imposed the wearing of this and the headscarf on women. The Qu'ran states 'women believers, cover thy bosom and private parts' it does not say cover your whole head and face. It means dress modestly. The culture of Islam, for which the burka and headscarf is, has swamped the true Islam. xx
A Dutch politician was shot and killed out the front of his home and the gunman disappeared into a well organised group of Burqa wearing "whom-ever's''. Its Military disguise under the disguise of Religious clothing.
@@jacquistephens605 Praise be to Allaah. Hijaab in Arabic means covering or concealing. Hijaab is the name of something that is used to cover. Everything that comes between two things is hijaab. Hijaab means everything that is used to cover something and prevent anyone from reaching it, such as curtains, door keepers and garments, etc. Khimaar comes from the word khamr, the root meaning of which is to cover. For example, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Khammiru aaniyatakum (cover your vessels).” Everything that covers something else is called its khimaar. But in common usage khimaar has come to be used as a name for the garment with which a woman covers her head; in some cases this does not go against the linguistic meaning of khimaar. Some of the fuqahaa’ have defined it as that which covers the head, the temples and the neck. The difference between the hijaab and the khimaar is that the hijaab is something which covers all of a woman’s body, whilst the khimaar in general is something with which a woman covers her head. Niqaab is that with which a woman veils her face (tantaqib)… The difference between hijaab and niqaab is that the hijaab is that which covers all the body, whilst niqaab is that which covers a woman’s face only. The woman’s dress as prescribed in sharee’ah (“Islamic dress”) is that which covers her head, face and all of her body. But the niqaab or burqa’ - which shows the eyes of the woman - has become widespread among women, and some of them do not wear it properly.Some scholars have forbidden wearing it on the grounds that it is not Islamic in origin, and because it is used improperly and people treat it as something insignificant, demonstrating negligent attitudes towards it and using new forms of niqaab which are not prescribed in Islam, widening the opening for the eyes so that the cheeks, nose and part of the forehead are also visible. Therefore, if the woman’s niqaab or burqa’ does not show anything but the eyes, and the opening is only as big as the left eye, as was narrated from some of the salaf, then that is permissible, otherwise she should wear something which covers her face entirely. Shaykh Muhammad al-Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The hijaab prescribed in sharee’ah means that a woman should cover everything that it is haraam for her to show, i.e., she should cover that which it is obligatory for her to cover, first and foremost of which is the face, because it is the focus of temptation and desire. A woman is obliged to cover her face in front of anyone who is not her mahram (blood relative to whom marriage is forbidden). From this we learn that the face is the most essential thing to be covered. There is evidence from the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the views of the Sahaabah and the imams and scholars of Islam, which indicates that women are obliged to cover all of their bodies in front of those who are not their mahrams. Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/ 391, 392) Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: The correct view as indicated by the evidence is that the woman’s face is ‘awrah which must be covered. It is the most tempting part of her body, because what people look at most is the face, so the face is the greatest ‘awrah of a woman. This is in addition to the shar’i evidence which states that it is obligatory to cover the face. For example, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)…” [al-Noor 24:31] Drawing the veil all over the juyoob implies covering the face. When Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) was asked about the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): “O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies” [al-Ahzaab 33:59] - he covered his face, leaving only one eye showing. This indicates that what was meant by the aayah was covering the face. This was the interpretation of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) of this aayah, as narrated from him by ‘Ubaydah al-Salmaani when he asked him about it. In the Sunnah there are many ahaadeeth, such as: the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The woman in ihraam is forbidden to veil her face (wear niqaab) or to wear the burqa’.” This indicates that when women were not in ihraam, women used to cover their faces. This does not mean that if a woman takes off her niqaab or burqa’ in the state of ihraam that she should leave her face uncovered in the presence of non-mahram men. Rather she is obliged to cover it with something other than the niqaab or burqa’, on the evidence of the hadeeth of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) who said: “We were with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in ihraam, and when men passed by us, we would lower the khimaar on our heads over our faces, and when they moved on we would lift it again.” Women in ihraam and otherwise are obliged to cover their faces in front of non-mahram men, because the face is the center of beauty and it is the place that men look at… and Allaah knows best. Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/396, 397 He also said: It is OK to cover the face with the niqaab or burqa’ which has two openings for the eyes only, because this was known at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and because of necessity. If nothing but the eyes show, this is fine, especially if this is customarily worn by women in her society. Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/399 And Allaah knows best.
@@jamescurtis4165 Actually I think you will find that Donkey Sex is the most often google search in many Muslim Countries. However in Iran The Ayatollah Khomeni: Published a guide for Shia Muslims in 2005 "Sex within ISLAM" (Tahrir-ol-vasyleh). Which states that If a Mans Penis has penetrated A WOMAN, MANS or ANIMALS ANUS then it is necessary to wash (Wuḍū is the Islamic procedure for wiping parts of the body, a type of ritual purification), whether the one being penetrated is alive or DEAD. In the guide, It is permitted (Halal) for a man to have Sex with animals such as Goats, Camels & so on. However he must kill the animal after he has his orgasm and he must not sell the meat in his own village. Also according to the Ayatollah's ruling, a man can have Sex with a baby. However, he must not penetrate vaginally, but Sodomising or Thighing (mufa'khathat) the child is OK. What a SICK disgusting thing!
@@jmonlive Are you another Muslim apologist Shill ? or just a gullible delusional useful fool ? Islam has hoodwinked you and others into thinking it is a Religion of Peace, when nothing further from the truth exists. Citing an 1899 quote from former British prime minister Winston Churchill. "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world, Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith." Muslims went in sufficient ratio to the Populace will start to call for Sharia Law to be implemented, and begin to riot and burn anything in their path to achieve this goal.
Donald Freymuth: You are one simple bastard who understands virtually nothing to make such a stupid remark. They are running from the horrors the Europeans and Americans have created in their countries of origin.
@@raykirkham5357 I think not Ray. Tyranny in the middle east in - Iraq thank Saddam Hussein, Iran thank Ayatollah Khomeni, Saudi Arabia thank Wahabbiism, Syria thank Assad (Russia), Egypt thank Arab Spring and the Muslim Brotherhood. WAR OVERALL in the middle east will continue between Shiite and Sunni. Commence your ignorant name calling to me now I'm sure of that.
@LOCAL COPE Demographically Islam has a big future in Europe. Not so much in USA as long as we remain vigilant over CAIR, and coal mine canaries like Homar an T-lab.
“In 2050 I’ll be dead so it doesn’t matter to me” what a dumb thing to say. I might not be here either but it does matter to me - it’s about the position we leave our kids in.
She's more than likely a professional who never had her own kids. But that's ok, a Muslim immigrant had six to make up for the ones she never bothered having.
K Edmodson: THANK YOU! I"m in my 60s, never had kids, but that's how I feel - I want to leave this world knowing that the children have a fair chance at a decent life.
Correct me if I'm wrong but i believe that we are the only species on planet that allow rouges to remain amongst us to the detriment of our community. Lions, elephants, birds even species of fish and sharks will drive away or devour a rouge in the herd or pack. Wtf don't we?
A.C. Skipper. There will always be cat ladies to feed the ferals, at the expense of the local "wild" life. Driven by pure emotion but devoid of all common sense.
Objection kiddie fiddler ! We were part of a task force that smashed your Qur'an and its script of hate ! Now every man alive knows your all Mohammeds ,it will happen again
am for that as a Muslim but plz don't fukign come over then promoting democrazy slavery because we don't want Rothschild slavery banks in our native countries. That what the British empire was about that what USA empire is bout and next will be israel empire ruling the world.
That's what Spain did 500 years ago (after 800 years of rapes, humiliations, subjugation, executions, murders, discrimination, pogroms, abuses, etc happily done on the local people).
@@rizsarwar2713, If you don't want western banks in your countries then stop letting them in and asking for their money. The economy of those countries totally depends on the oil they sell to the outside world and those banks and businesses were invited in for the income they represent. The answer is simple. Kick them all out. The U.S.A. has all the oil we need. They can always sell their oil to China. See how long they like that relationship.
Escaping their own nations, who don't allow multiculturalism... NO CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION, but we must lift our skirts and let them in and provide food and logging...
I was just curious whats the address of the Christian church in Riyadh Saudia Arabia? Oh yes. There are no churches because it is illegal. Japan and Angola have no problems keeping certain populations out.
@@richardokeefe7410 In my humble opinion, ALL RELIGIONS ARE PURE BULLSHIT. I cannot approve of Muslims conquering anybody any more than I can believe in Jews or Christians conquering anybody ON THE BASIS OF BULLSHIT. War in MODERN TIMES is even more bullshit than any religion. We are living in an age when all out war can wipe out the whole human race. Let us stop acting like children and begin at last to tolerate each other's RELIGIONS AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS rather than reify the idea of HELL. reify: makes something abstract more concrete or real. Why would anybody want to make HELL exist anywhere?
No amount of 'accommodation' seems to be enough. She was speaking in 2011 yet since then we have had terrorist attack after terrorist attack. It is hard to feel hopeful.
@@eminahist710 -- want to do a comparison? For every person killed by all radical groups put together, there are a thousand killed by Islamists. In Islam there is no such thing as "radical Islam", there is only the Quran.
@@michaelbinder7348 The Quran doesn't advocate unprovoked violence nor does it suggest a physical jihad. There is even a line stating "no compulsion in religion". The sword verse regarding killing pagans is consistently taken out of context. It refers to a historical conflict in which a Muslim community was betrayed and warred on by pagans.
@@ericmanget4280 -- That is the common misconception pushed by ... Muslims. Why? Because it is in the first part of their Koran which is the face they wish to put on their cult ... errr ... religion. However what isn't disseminated except to true believers is the part where everyone must believe the Koran word for word. Those that do not are either enslaved until they do, or if they resist they are eliminated. No exceptions. Muslims cannot assimilate into other societies because it is against the Koran. The other societies must become Muslim. They do this by infiltrating the population by appearing benign, and then work their way into positions of government. Once they gain the majority, they implement Sharia Law. That has happened in every country where Muslims have dominated. It even happened in the beginning after Mohammed decided to use the Bible as the basis for his domineering cult since the Bible had a following that he could not gain with his radicalism. The countries that resisted were overrun for centuries until Muslims finally got pushed back. We call those places Europe. Unfortunately they're going about a second invasion, this time using benign infiltration. And it is working. It is happening all across the United States as well. Minnesota even managed to get Muslims into Congress. How is that working out?
This is another well meaning, clueless White woman. No one ever asked for and no one ever wanted, multicultural countries. Accommodation? Only because these foreign people (yes, I know, these “other”) were imposed on us by . . . people like her.
So often I read or hear about what is necessary for those who already live in the lands to which the immigrants come to accommodate them, yet I've not yet read or heard about what the immigrants need to do to respect and integrate themselves into the lands to which they come. It always seems that the receiving population is the one which is expected to change and adapt, but not so with the incoming populations. Give and take, mutual respect should be absolutely necessary for such an integration. However, it seems to me that those who arrive in new lands should be willing to adapt to their new surroundings much more so that those who are there should totally change their ways of life and values.
Actually, she IS trying to advocate for finding some common ground. She treats things like accomodating headscarves as the western compromise, while expecting the immigrants to support our basic secular democratic principles as the immigrants' compromise (no sharia, no right to a female doctor...). This makes sense - hold firm on the deep core principles of our societies, but don't sweat the small stuff. If someone wants to pray to Allah, no problem; if they don't want to allow their girls to go to school, too bad you have to accept that if you want to live here. That is, she's trying to find a balance based on western values, and tolerating only those who are willing to integrate in the areas critical to society's functioning. It's fair to disagree with that and present counterpoints, but it's not a disreputable or evil position. It comes from the noblest of western values. Some believe it's naive and some think it's possible. It's early to tell, but I fear the worst.
A number of years ago, a minority (numbers wise) of a particular Religion working in a hospital in the midle of Ireland requested that the statue of the Virgin Mary be removed from its display location in the hospital and some of our wonderful native 'yes' people actually did it. It wasn't long before the native Irish working in the hospital and for whom this was an important symbol had it put back. This is just an example of how minority groups can try to push their aims. Compromise is good.
@@zephsmith3499 All anyone needs to do is to look at the actual situation which has resulted from immigration by Muslims into primarily Christian countries, and most people will agree it is not successful. A large part of the world is inhabited by Muslim cultures, and Muslims can more easily integrate into countries which are already majority Muslim. It's not too early to tell, just listen to what they are saying! Muslims want Sharia law, and they should move to Muslim majority countries to have it. Christian majority countries have every right to defend their culture and laws.
Lovely isn't it, the elite have done their job, the policy people, same ones that are TEACHING children to be gay, come and get me reprobates, I never bought into your lies when I was a child , and it's to late to change now, the messenger
Drives me crazy--why do we always resort to accommodation when dealing with Muslim people entering our borders? WE are the house they are a guest in and many of their most vocal leaders seemingly hope to take over the household. Of all the groups that come to our doorstep and ask for admittance, Muslims are the one group we suddenly have to speak in hushed tones with, change our plans for dinner (no pork), women's fashions (cover them up!), totally revise our work and school routines and schedules for prayer and so on to fit their schedules, and they are GUESTS in our nations. The worst part of it is they are the one group with a recent history of violence and bloodshed against western nations dating well back past 9/11, and seemingly because of that hint of violence that their extremists could bring (never mind the moderates, whose reactions to criticism of Islamic practices is violent as well, turning into demonstrations, protests etc. to cartoons and other commentary), their admittance is handled with kid gloves and we are expected to accommodate their needs, not demanding that they learn to live according to our way of life and our customs. READ THE KORAN--IT ENCOURAGES DOMINATION OF, NOT INTEGRATION INTO, "INFIDEL" SOCIETY (OUR OWN) , AND NON-BELIEVERS ARE EITHER PERSECUTED OR KILLED FOR THEIR VIOLATION OF THAT STATE LAW, SINCE SHARIAH LAW IS RELIGIOUS AND STATE LAW WOVEN INTO ONE FABRIC THAT DEMANDS CONFORMITY FROM ALL LIVING IN THAT STATE. Canada has a prime minister who has passed a law forbidding criticism of Islam (all vaguely under the title of hate speech, which could mean anything according to the interpreter), so Islam is the one group with the governmental protection it needs to creep into the rest of government and society. Ironically, the neighbourhoods he will spend the rest of his life in, where the affluent and other trust funds babies live, are far from those of the common people who will have to deal with the consequences of such a short-sighted and even treasonous policy against their nation, way of life, security and democratic freedoms.
I agree, but would add one comment, our descendants ill very likely find themselves members of a minority group in their birthright nation due to an imbalance in breeding with incoming races and religions wiser Countries and governments impose elements to control this possibility, we just stand and watch apparently. MP's wake up.
@@roybarratt2442 The baby boomers in North America were sold a bill of goods when they were instructed in High school not to have more than 2 children in order to keep our population down and allow room for foreigners while the Muslims were told to have as many children as possible to build Islam. Now we are the minority in our own countries.
When Europeans visit Muslim countries they have to follow their ways ... Especially women who have to wear head scarfs covering their hair and faces, and have to be segregated from men .... how about other regions in the Middle East are forbidden unless it’s Islam how is that okay!? I do not care for your beliefs or traditions you can practice them as you please but at your homes and at your own time period especially if you are immigrating to my country bc that is what I would do integrate, learn your language, laws, culture, and be one with the society I live in!! But you don’t want that and therefor are calling for attention and fear which targets you as a race and people! Example if I am gay and are in an place where people are more conservative/traditional am I going to ignore that and target myself that I well know won’t do me any good unless I am trying to bring attention to myself! You can’t assume that everyone is going to like you and let alone like your beliefs and ways of life period why make yourself and others feel separate and force anyone to change when they didn’t ask you to or aren’t allowed to do the same in your country and then cry about it to make others feel sorry about you as if you are a victim!!! Muslims are well aware that they aren’t in their own countries and yet most don’t give a damn and walk over the laws and ways of their new homes they have made in foreign countries that have given them so much and so many opportunities to assimilate and become one! You can keep your faith and language but don’t come to my country and try to change mine and if you are coming come in legally and be ready to learn our ways just like what we would have to do when we come to your countries!!!!! You want and ask for acceptance but yet you aren’t doing the same for the non-Muslims!!!!! That is what I call hypocritical and ignorant and savage and backwards and radical and intolerable towards all does who do not have the same beliefs as you but yet we have to bc otherwise that is racist or ignorant of us!!!!!!! All I say Karma will get you one day and it will be soon then later!!!!! So keep enjoying the welfare, jobs and the benefits you were given just like any other citizen if not more then the actual natives living there!!!!
All new nice sounding mumbo jumbo.. .fact is that they operate on the salami slice principle....just when you think they've had enough salami they want another slice.
Correct. And there is a certain cabal that uses false flags to rile them up. View: 1. *Road to World Government - G. Edward Griffin.* (MI64a4P5Xbg) 2. *Usury - The Real Reason The J ews Would Kill Jesus All Over Again* (Cj5nTmTTIoA) 3. *ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS* (QlunSNY5B48) 4. *The Globalist Agenda Explained* by RockingMrE
Seven years old. I remember telling leftys this was coming in the early 00's and was ridiculed. Now you gotta accept it or they call you a islamophobe.
Well, I live in Quebec AND work in a hospital, and guess what? they still make demands. I'm not saying all, but many women want to be treated by women and the men don't want to be touched by women, kinda hard to do when you're coming in for something that is physical. And we cave in because it's easier.
Himself Lee of course I won’t consider religion or cultural back ground when helping patients, Plus as a Muslim I believe that I’m watched by god and I have to do everything in perfect way in order not to be sinning, we believe that perfecting our jobs is a way of worship too and by doing this god will reward us in the here after.
It is all very well to emphasize the need to accommodate the muslim immigrants BUT without those immigrants having the desire to assimilate ( and that is an issue in the U.K.), then the equality scales are heavily loaded in ONE direction, and will eventually bring severe unrest!
Islam is spreading its ugly head throughout Canada and endangering our citizenry. There are a lot of very angry and pissed off people in every province due to this Muslim influx which our pathetic media will not properly report and a Prime Minister that has exacerbated the situation multi fold.
That may have worked if the Islamics were interested in getting along but they are not and have stated publicly that they intend to take over even here in the U.S.
men and women are going to work in the dark...coming home in the dark...working hard to live...and subsidising people who don't feel like working....whip look at them with contempt as they go off to work in the morning. For how much longer. That's the question..
I wonder how it would pass if Europeans moved to mainly Muslim countries right now ? I don't think they would be afforded the courtesies that Europe has extended, things would be a lot different. I too am glad I won't be around in 2050, I would be 93 . Greetings From Australia.
The flash point is obviously whether europeans will be compelled to obey islamic blasphemy laws. Since this is the main issue, why do you refrain from mentioning it?
The principle within the maxim “Live and let live” should be cardinal law and acknowledgement a condition of residence for all. In case of conflicting social norms the established practice of the population prevails. If we all reduced our self centred focus on “the rights of the individual” and made them secondary to the citizens obligation to the society we are in, most divisive issues would disappear.
TIm Smith , I had a hard time understanding her but I know that diversity (allowing mass immigration) will destroy a country. Look at the U.S. they need to start deporting, especially those who refuse to conform.
@@Truther567 I agree, all illegals and bogus refugees in US and Europe should be deported immediately. Strange, the Governments are unwilling to sort it out, instead they are allowing it to happen and get worse! May be they are afraid of ignoring orders from Jewish politicians in US responsible for creating the problem !
Here, ladies and gents, is a prime example of an argument based on faulty premise, a corrupted and narrow definition of 'accommodation' as the basis for a proposed policy.It is, by reality of 2018, a clear clash of cultures - Western culture/secular laws vs one which marries its highly restrictive laws and government TO religion as a matter of national identity. In fact, in the Middle East (save for Israel) religion defines and controls all countries. 'Accommodation' in the West has already happened, far exceeding freedoms Muslim population may enjoy in the Middle East (which cannot be said the other way around). Her apologist argument calls for the non-Muslim (often already very diverse) section of society to adjust to an incoming and 'already in residence' (in greater numbers) population segment without a reasonable expectation of integration (treating it as some draconian imposition) and, frankly, intolerance of what defined each country over centuries. Apparently unchecked import is a right, as is the foregone conclusion of superiority of pluralism in its most liberal, unsustainable multi-cultural Utopia definition. The take-away should be then (?!) that Western culture, itseems, has not done enough in 'accommodation', by failing to treat one group as more special than everyone else. The argument follows - by failing to do so, Western culture invites well-deserved ire, with only solution to this being to try harder. ... or 'else'.The only suitable 'accommodation', it appears, would be elevation of this particular population segment to a higher prominance, incorporating its religion-based laws into Western law and tolerating its tendency to function as an autonomous sector. It is the most erosive and self-destructive pluralist phylosophy has to offer. What has been seen in practice over and over is the epic failure of self-segregation (inclusive of no-go zones/ghettos as an extreme by-product) combined with categorical rejection and intolerance of principles which are pillars of Western civilization - yes, those same principles which allowed the (apparently) aggrieved group to settle in Europe and North America in growing numbers while enjoying freedoms and opportunities unheard of in the ME. While delivered as a reasonable, well thought-out argument, speaker's position is much like a chocolate bonbon presented wrapped in a shiny cellophane wrapper which turns out to be crafted from horse manure. Adding insult to injury, the virtue-signalling woman appears to belong to the very religion existence of which is so bothersome to the one in question. Her culture's 'accommodation' in a most (all?) Middle Eastern countries resulted in complete eradication by decree an/or violence, with those lucky enough to survive incurring a financial penalty as a matter of law ... dictated by religion. Oh, the irony.Seven years after this video with everything that's happened since, I do not expect any change to her stance because it is a mindset based on skewed view of reality, i.e. cognitive dissonance, rather than reality-based assessment. Oh, the tragedy.
The literal meaning of Islam is "Submission." Educate yourself and your children as to what you are instructed to submit to under Islam and Shariah law.
No one voted for any of this. It was forced top-down. The one and only country that put a vote to the people on the topic of racial strangers immigrating into the country was Hungary and over 95% of respondents said no.
The big problem for me is assimilation. When the easten European countries joined the EU it was very quick, one generation and they were usually culturally indistinguishable. But that appears to only rarely be the case with immigration from middle-easten countries. What we seem to see instead is a very strong tendancy to form enclaves and resist if not outright reject western values. And this is most evident in the sheer number of westen-born muslims who travelled to join Islamic State, an organisation which openly advertises their western value-opposing culture.
Want to get Smarter, Faster?
Subscribe for DAILY videos: bigth.ink/GetSmarter
Why acommodate them at all? This is a ridiculous narrative.
@LOCAL COPE You are blaming the Jews! Thats inane, immature and calling yourself a victim. Its our fault if we vote poor representatives into power. Socialists can only stay in power if they create victims and break up homogenous societies. If you buy into that Victim mentality, then blame yourself. The "Not having enough kids" narrative can be solved quite easily by creating incentives for ones own population to have children.
@@isongalolo ACTUNG JUDEN!
@@isongalolo No, Vince - we have all the evidence to prove exactly this. Of course it's the jews - jews ARE the socialists who are behind it. But then you're one, so of course you come up with every ridiculous argument you can think of to distract from the facts.
@@thirdghost8887 : Let's imagine, just for one crazy moment, that you have a point; Don't you think that the actual perpetrators, should be held culpable in some shape or form, or are you just so he'll bent on blaming the Jews for EVERYTHING, that you can't see past your own prejudice?
Look inwards and you will find the hatred you have for others is simply an echo of your own self hatred.
How do you accommodate a group that is set on destroying everything you value?
@fredricksickelbower9431 : Simple! Grow some goodwill, and just get out of your prideful, hateful echo chamber of falsehood, and start learning about Islam and its tenets. The world will be a less scary place. I promise you!
Drive them into the sea while you have the chance!
Muslims will not assimilate with non-Muslims or kafirs as they call us.
This is the most basic issue
The same policies should be implemented in Saudi Arabia and co. right?
A nation is the largest functioning political block. It is comprised of smaller states and then counties and then cities and then communities and then churches and organizations and then families. Each of these is a voting block and individual power increases the further down the line you go. It is not at all clear that democracy works well at a national level because it is so easy to subvert at that level. Multicultural nations face the greatest headwinds towards peace and progress and problem solving because they don't have a common language, morality or look. Inviting differing cultures into your nation increases discord and reduces even more the usefulness of democracy as a means of governing. To be a Japanese citizen, both of your parents must be born Japanese, you must understand and speak fluent Japanese as your native language and you must "act" Japanese. That is how it should be everywhere. None of that deprives anybody of the joy of experiencing other cultures, learning other languages or appreciating other views. It simply lets you do it in the comfort of your own culture.
The line of non-Christians trying to get into countries built on Judeo-Christian values is limitless. The line of Christians and Jews trying to get into non-Christians does not exist. The fact is that cultures have developed independently over many centuries and the notion that within a matter of years multiculturism will work, is naive, dangerous and nonsensical. Nothing good will come from forcing Jews, Christians and Hindus to live with or accommodate Muslims. The religion of Islam prohibits coexistence with other ideologies and therefore, the liberal globalist ideology of forcing this to happen will end in war.
I think when you go to a house that does not belong to you, you had better knock on the door and request permission to enter, before you do... (then conduct yourself as a proper guest should) otherwise, don't act all surprised when people start shooting at you. [period]
I am simply not interested in multiculteralism. I like my own culture very much. This woman is my enemy
"Multi racialism could work if we just had the guts to drop the curtain on this useless and misinterpreted catch phrase, 'Multi culturalism'. It is these cultures, not individuals or races, which are the problems when it comes to passive integration. Let's encourage multi racialism under one unified system which enables us to celebrate all individuals diverse heritage and dispose of those cultures which are permiating and wrecking every known society today with their archaic, brutal, misogynistic and radicaly tribal, brainwashed beliefs."
Right every nation has its own Demography and culture . There is nothing wrong to protect them from India.
The Word I Use Is "Multiethnic."
Yeah the colonialism is bad
@@thegreatest1176 exactly that y they need to go back
Time to remove them, not accommodate them.
Hungary has defied the EU by erecting fences. For such a small country they felt they were being overwhelmed. Angela Merkel is being blamed for her early on open borders policy. Sweden and Denmark is looking to deport some. Brexit is rooted in what's being described as an invasion but for want of appearing politically correct they say its about trade not migration.
@@gordmerrick7336 AUSTRIA JUST WOKE UP,,,,,the new GOV is fighting back
YES Remove them enough accomodation
The burka is a strong symbol. Should it be banned? Why not simply treat it the same way as wearing full SS uniform?
I do not like when I cannot see someones face, personal issue, hell it could be a man, how can anyone walk around in trust. Besides my personal issue, if police need to id you, you better be willing to unwrap your face or go to jail until you are proven innocent. People who want to get away with something will start using that to illude. It is common sense.
Jim, the burka has no relevance in true Islam. The burka was worn by Arabs in the desert to protect their faces against sandstorms. It is men in Islam that have imposed the wearing of this and the headscarf on women. The Qu'ran states 'women believers, cover thy bosom and private parts' it does not say cover your whole head and face. It means dress modestly. The culture of Islam, for which the burka and headscarf is, has swamped the true Islam. xx
Mj Davis jju
A Dutch politician was shot and killed out the front of his home and the gunman disappeared into a well organised group of Burqa wearing "whom-ever's''. Its Military disguise under the disguise of Religious clothing.
@@jacquistephens605 Praise be to Allaah.
Hijaab in Arabic means covering or concealing. Hijaab is the name of something that is used to cover. Everything that comes between two things is hijaab.
Hijaab means everything that is used to cover something and prevent anyone from reaching it, such as curtains, door keepers and garments, etc.
Khimaar comes from the word khamr, the root meaning of which is to cover. For example, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Khammiru aaniyatakum (cover your vessels).” Everything that covers something else is called its khimaar.
But in common usage khimaar has come to be used as a name for the garment with which a woman covers her head; in some cases this does not go against the linguistic meaning of khimaar.
Some of the fuqahaa’ have defined it as that which covers the head, the temples and the neck.
The difference between the hijaab and the khimaar is that the hijaab is something which covers all of a woman’s body, whilst the khimaar in general is something with which a woman covers her head.
Niqaab is that with which a woman veils her face (tantaqib)…
The difference between hijaab and niqaab is that the hijaab is that which covers all the body, whilst niqaab is that which covers a woman’s face only.
The woman’s dress as prescribed in sharee’ah (“Islamic dress”) is that which covers her head, face and all of her body.
But the niqaab or burqa’ - which shows the eyes of the woman - has become widespread among women, and some of them do not wear it properly.Some scholars have forbidden wearing it on the grounds that it is not Islamic in origin, and because it is used improperly and people treat it as something insignificant, demonstrating negligent attitudes towards it and using new forms of niqaab which are not prescribed in Islam, widening the opening for the eyes so that the cheeks, nose and part of the forehead are also visible.
Therefore, if the woman’s niqaab or burqa’ does not show anything but the eyes, and the opening is only as big as the left eye, as was narrated from some of the salaf, then that is permissible, otherwise she should wear something which covers her face entirely.
Shaykh Muhammad al-Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
The hijaab prescribed in sharee’ah means that a woman should cover everything that it is haraam for her to show, i.e., she should cover that which it is obligatory for her to cover, first and foremost of which is the face, because it is the focus of temptation and desire.
A woman is obliged to cover her face in front of anyone who is not her mahram (blood relative to whom marriage is forbidden). From this we learn that the face is the most essential thing to be covered. There is evidence from the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the views of the Sahaabah and the imams and scholars of Islam, which indicates that women are obliged to cover all of their bodies in front of those who are not their mahrams.
Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/ 391, 392)
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:
The correct view as indicated by the evidence is that the woman’s face is ‘awrah which must be covered. It is the most tempting part of her body, because what people look at most is the face, so the face is the greatest ‘awrah of a woman. This is in addition to the shar’i evidence which states that it is obligatory to cover the face.
For example, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)…”
[al-Noor 24:31]
Drawing the veil all over the juyoob implies covering the face.
When Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) was asked about the aayah (interpretation of the meaning):
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies”
[al-Ahzaab 33:59] -
he covered his face, leaving only one eye showing. This indicates that what was meant by the aayah was covering the face. This was the interpretation of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) of this aayah, as narrated from him by ‘Ubaydah al-Salmaani when he asked him about it.
In the Sunnah there are many ahaadeeth, such as: the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The woman in ihraam is forbidden to veil her face (wear niqaab) or to wear the burqa’.” This indicates that when women were not in ihraam, women used to cover their faces.
This does not mean that if a woman takes off her niqaab or burqa’ in the state of ihraam that she should leave her face uncovered in the presence of non-mahram men. Rather she is obliged to cover it with something other than the niqaab or burqa’, on the evidence of the hadeeth of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) who said: “We were with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in ihraam, and when men passed by us, we would lower the khimaar on our heads over our faces, and when they moved on we would lift it again.”
Women in ihraam and otherwise are obliged to cover their faces in front of non-mahram men, because the face is the center of beauty and it is the place that men look at… and Allaah knows best.
Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/396, 397
He also said:
It is OK to cover the face with the niqaab or burqa’ which has two openings for the eyes only, because this was known at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and because of necessity. If nothing but the eyes show, this is fine, especially if this is customarily worn by women in her society.
Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/399
And Allaah knows best.
We're looking at real trouble.
Islam destroys everything. Human Locust
Ghengis: FU you human cochroach!
@@jamescurtis4165 Thanks James i stand erected.
@@jamescurtis4165 Actually I think you will find that Donkey Sex is the most often google search in many Muslim Countries.
However in Iran The Ayatollah Khomeni: Published a guide for Shia Muslims in 2005 "Sex within ISLAM" (Tahrir-ol-vasyleh). Which states that If a Mans Penis has penetrated A WOMAN, MANS or ANIMALS ANUS then it is necessary to wash (Wuḍū is the Islamic procedure for wiping parts of the body, a type of ritual purification), whether the one being penetrated is alive or DEAD. In the guide, It is permitted (Halal) for a man to have Sex with animals such as Goats, Camels & so on. However he must kill the animal after he has his orgasm and he must not sell the meat in his own village. Also according to the Ayatollah's ruling, a man can have Sex with a baby. However, he must not penetrate vaginally, but Sodomising or Thighing (mufa'khathat) the child is OK. What a SICK disgusting thing!
@@jmonlive Are you another Muslim apologist Shill ? or just a gullible delusional useful fool ? Islam has hoodwinked you and others into thinking it is a Religion of Peace, when nothing further from the truth exists.
Citing an 1899 quote from former British prime minister Winston Churchill.
"Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world, Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith."
Muslims went in sufficient ratio to the Populace will start to call for Sharia Law to be implemented, and begin to riot and burn anything in their path to achieve this goal.
@JRRnotTolkien Elaborate please ??
Take away the honey and the ants will leave!
Donald Freymuth You got that Right Donald .
This disaster is not looming for Muslims, its the Europeans who will have to face it and actually already do so.
Donald Freymuth: You are one simple bastard who understands virtually nothing to make such a stupid remark. They are running from the horrors the Europeans and Americans have created in their countries of origin.
@@raykirkham5357 I think not Ray. Tyranny in the middle east in - Iraq thank Saddam Hussein, Iran thank Ayatollah Khomeni, Saudi Arabia thank Wahabbiism, Syria thank Assad (Russia), Egypt thank Arab Spring and the Muslim Brotherhood. WAR OVERALL in the middle east will continue between Shiite and Sunni. Commence your ignorant name calling to me now I'm sure of that.
@@raykirkham5357 Bollocks
Respect must be mutual - an impossibility for followers of Islam.
I believe the best Europe can manage is some sort of apardheid similar to the Ottoman "millet" system. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millet_(Ottoman_Empire)
@LOCAL COPE
Demographically Islam has a big future in Europe. Not so much in USA as long as we remain vigilant over CAIR, and coal mine canaries like Homar an T-lab.
@@timsmith2279 : If that were the case, then the Muslims could, just say no.
Their Koran tells them to disrespect ALL other religions and unbelievers.
@baboo mohamed so do we. And you're in our countries, now.
Why is it only the native europeans that have to make accomodations?
Because the Europeans allegedly persecuted Jews during WW2 !
Because CORRUPT POLITICIANS want ISLAMIZATION and the DESTRUCTION of CHRISTIANITY
@@Li-mx7uyBecause of colonialism. Its payback
i was saying this from the beginning.....most people didnt want to listen. it won't end up pretty.
Spot on !!
“In 2050 I’ll be dead so it doesn’t matter to me” what a dumb thing to say. I might not be here either but it does matter to me - it’s about the position we leave our kids in.
Probably she has no children. After all, what kind of a man would mate with her?
She's more than likely a professional who never had her own kids. But that's ok, a Muslim immigrant had six to make up for the ones she never bothered having.
That quote is simply the remark of a coward. I'm with you K Edmodson.
K Edmodson: THANK YOU! I"m in my 60s, never had kids, but that's how I feel - I want to leave this world knowing that the children have a fair chance at a decent life.
In 2050 my granddaughter will be nearly 35. I might or might not be alive, but I can't imagine not caring what will happen to her.
Diversity is not a strength... unity is.
Would you stop feeding stray
dogs if they were spreading rabies?
Correct me if I'm wrong but i believe that we are the only species on planet that allow rouges to remain amongst us to the detriment of our community. Lions, elephants, birds even species of fish and sharks will drive away or devour a rouge in the herd or pack. Wtf don't we?
rabies to a dog is like islam to a man
A.C. Skipper. There will always be cat ladies to feed the ferals, at the expense of the local "wild" life. Driven by pure emotion but devoid of all common sense.
If you stop feeding stray dogs the dogs will attack you and kill you big mistake letting this happen don't feed in the beginning end of
No
Get them out! Before it's too late. FOR EVERYONE!
We, Europeans, just DO NOT NEED THIS PEOPLE!!!!! Enough of this apalling outrage!
Stay out of our countries and we will stay out of yours.
Objection kiddie fiddler ! We were part of a task force that smashed your Qur'an and its script of hate ! Now every man alive knows your all Mohammeds ,it will happen again
@@pedrodegreatlazoro1416 I feel sorry for you
Thats bigotry in motion ! Why feel sory for a citizen you pray 5 times a day for ? Or 3 ?
Im god and my word is unsaid !
"figure out how to accommodate" - what for? "there will be increasing numbers of riots" - okay, send them back then? What's the big issue.
I have a better idea: EXPULSION.
YES
Foolish and suicidal (no pun intended) idea!
A friend of Trudeau certainly ....
It's nice to keep kidding ourselves but we all have to wake up one day.
U people wake up too late if u disgust us arabs u guys will get waked up when persians is coming or nazis will raise
Primitive Ideology cannot live with modern man.
No compromise. send them all back.
am for that as a Muslim but plz don't fukign come over then promoting democrazy slavery because we don't want Rothschild slavery banks in our native countries. That what the British empire was about that what USA empire is bout and next will be israel empire ruling the world.
@@rizsarwar2713 You are on to the Neo-Liberal lie and scheme. Smart person!
That's what Spain did 500 years ago (after 800 years of rapes, humiliations, subjugation, executions, murders, discrimination, pogroms, abuses, etc happily done on the local people).
@@rizsarwar2713 The Rothschilds own all the banks except for Iran nth Korea and Syria.so they already own your countries central bank system.
@@rizsarwar2713,
If you don't want western banks in your countries then stop letting them in and asking for their money. The economy of those countries totally depends on the oil they sell to the outside world and those banks and businesses were invited in for the income they represent. The answer is simple. Kick them all out. The U.S.A. has all the oil we need. They can always sell their oil to China. See how long they like that relationship.
You can start by 'accommodating' them in their own nations.
Escaping their own nations, who don't allow multiculturalism... NO CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION, but we must lift our skirts and let them in and provide food and logging...
Yep send them a supply of nuclear weapons. Turn their whole domain into black glass.
Yes its better they stay there and fight for better education , medical and job opportunities .
Just ask the public what we want it’s not that hard
I was just curious whats the address of the Christian church in Riyadh Saudia Arabia?
Oh yes. There are no churches because it is illegal.
Japan and Angola have no problems keeping certain populations out.
The bible is illegal in some of their countries. The Koran needs to be banned, it is evil.
@White Panther yep! The Bible is banned in Saudi. We should treat them the same. 109 violent verses in the koran.
You know IT'S A WAHHABI COUNTRY WHO SUPPORTED TERRORISM GROUPS LIKE ISIS ETC.NOT A MUSLIM COUNTRY.
@@donnahilton471 They don't read quran exept for their interests.
@@hadisehlavasani1612 It claims it is Muslim.
Winston Churchill said 100 years ago "There is no reasoning with the Mohammadian" I think that he was correct.
5 minutes of ideological nonsense skirting around the real issues.
As a child I wondered why King Richard went to the crusades to defeat Saladin and the Moors. Now I get it.
What do you get?
he was defeated by Salaheddine
Richard was a neocon. There were other things that drew conquerors than oil in those days, but the greed was still the same.
To recover territory lost to brutal invaders who liked smashing other people';s religious sites.
@@richardokeefe7410 In my humble opinion, ALL RELIGIONS ARE PURE BULLSHIT. I cannot approve of Muslims conquering anybody any more than I can believe in Jews or Christians conquering anybody ON THE BASIS OF BULLSHIT. War in MODERN TIMES is even more bullshit than any religion. We are living in an age when all out war can wipe out the whole human race. Let us stop acting like children and begin at last to tolerate each other's RELIGIONS AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS rather than reify the idea of HELL.
reify: makes something abstract more concrete or real. Why would anybody want to make HELL exist anywhere?
No amount of 'accommodation' seems to be enough. She was speaking in 2011 yet since then we have had terrorist attack after terrorist attack. It is hard to feel hopeful.
nazis kkclan still murdering. please look for your house!!!!!!
@@eminahist710 -- want to do a comparison? For every person killed by all radical groups put together, there are a thousand killed by Islamists. In Islam there is no such thing as "radical Islam", there is only the Quran.
allahuakabors are never accommodating, not in their bedouin lands, not in the great west, not even on their pagan🌙moon god.
@@michaelbinder7348 The Quran doesn't advocate unprovoked violence nor does it suggest a physical jihad. There is even a line stating "no compulsion in religion". The sword verse regarding killing pagans is consistently taken out of context. It refers to a historical conflict in which a Muslim community was betrayed and warred on by pagans.
@@ericmanget4280 -- That is the common misconception pushed by ... Muslims. Why? Because it is in the first part of their Koran which is the face they wish to put on their cult ... errr ... religion. However what isn't disseminated except to true believers is the part where everyone must believe the Koran word for word. Those that do not are either enslaved until they do, or if they resist they are eliminated. No exceptions. Muslims cannot assimilate into other societies because it is against the Koran. The other societies must become Muslim. They do this by infiltrating the population by appearing benign, and then work their way into positions of government. Once they gain the majority, they implement Sharia Law.
That has happened in every country where Muslims have dominated. It even happened in the beginning after Mohammed decided to use the Bible as the basis for his domineering cult since the Bible had a following that he could not gain with his radicalism. The countries that resisted were overrun for centuries until Muslims finally got pushed back. We call those places Europe. Unfortunately they're going about a second invasion, this time using benign infiltration. And it is working.
It is happening all across the United States as well. Minnesota even managed to get Muslims into Congress. How is that working out?
Many keep harping about diversity. A diversity of values cannot co-exist.
It can, but not under conditions of economic stress.
This is another well meaning, clueless White woman.
No one ever asked for and no one ever wanted, multicultural countries.
Accommodation? Only because these foreign people (yes, I know, these “other”) were imposed on us by . . . people like her.
@@timsmith2279 Soon there will be mixing of white wombs and African and Arab sperm!
homerun ! It is had been happen , 35% of U.S. WHITE WOMAN. Had breeds with the BLACK man.
So often I read or hear about what is necessary for those who already live in the lands to which the immigrants come to accommodate them, yet I've not yet read or heard about what the immigrants need to do to respect and integrate themselves into the lands to which they come. It always seems that the receiving population is the one which is expected to change and adapt, but not so with the incoming populations. Give and take, mutual respect should be absolutely necessary for such an integration. However, it seems to me that those who arrive in new lands should be willing to adapt to their new surroundings much more so that those who are there should totally change their ways of life and values.
Actually, she IS trying to advocate for finding some common ground. She treats things like accomodating headscarves as the western compromise, while expecting the immigrants to support our basic secular democratic principles as the immigrants' compromise (no sharia, no right to a female doctor...). This makes sense - hold firm on the deep core principles of our societies, but don't sweat the small stuff. If someone wants to pray to Allah, no problem; if they don't want to allow their girls to go to school, too bad you have to accept that if you want to live here.
That is, she's trying to find a balance based on western values, and tolerating only those who are willing to integrate in the areas critical to society's functioning.
It's fair to disagree with that and present counterpoints, but it's not a disreputable or evil position. It comes from the noblest of western values. Some believe it's naive and some think it's possible. It's early to tell, but I fear the worst.
A number of years ago, a minority (numbers wise) of a particular Religion working in a hospital in the midle of Ireland requested that the statue of the Virgin Mary be removed from its display location in the hospital and some of our wonderful native 'yes' people actually did it. It wasn't long before the native Irish working in the hospital and for whom this was an important symbol had it put back. This is just an example of how minority groups can try to push their aims. Compromise is good.
@@user-ep5je1wl9r im guessing muslim?
Wgen Canadians kick zTrudeau then they better abolish that law
@@zephsmith3499 All anyone needs to do is to look at the actual situation which has resulted from immigration by Muslims into primarily Christian countries, and most people will agree it is not successful. A large part of the world is inhabited by Muslim cultures, and Muslims can more easily integrate into countries which are already majority Muslim. It's not too early to tell, just listen to what they are saying! Muslims want Sharia law, and they should move to Muslim majority countries to have it. Christian majority countries have every right to defend their culture and laws.
How about they embrace Secular society and law or GTFO?
Get them to Fuck out....kiddie fiddling filth.
How are Muslims not embracing Secular society? Are they breaking the laws of the land?
War will come.
You can draw any line you like but you must remember that these people will never stop pushing for more and more concessions from us.
Lovely isn't it, the elite have done their job, the policy people, same ones that are TEACHING children to be gay, come and get me reprobates, I never bought into your lies when I was a child , and it's to late to change now, the messenger
True but when it comes to their own muslim countries they dare not open their mouth against any injustice and those who do simply disappear..
This lady is obviously completely clueless..........
Drives me crazy--why do we always resort to accommodation when dealing with Muslim people entering our borders? WE are the house they are a guest in and many of their most vocal leaders seemingly hope to take over the household. Of all the groups that come to our doorstep and ask for admittance, Muslims are the one group we suddenly have to speak in hushed tones with, change our plans for dinner (no pork), women's fashions (cover them up!), totally revise our work and school routines and schedules for prayer and so on to fit their schedules, and they are GUESTS in our nations. The worst part of it is they are the one group with a recent history of violence and bloodshed against western nations dating well back past 9/11, and seemingly because of that hint of violence that their extremists could bring (never mind the moderates, whose reactions to criticism of Islamic practices is violent as well, turning into demonstrations, protests etc. to cartoons and other commentary), their admittance is handled with kid gloves and we are expected to accommodate their needs, not demanding that they learn to live according to our way of life and our customs. READ THE KORAN--IT ENCOURAGES DOMINATION OF, NOT INTEGRATION INTO, "INFIDEL" SOCIETY (OUR OWN) , AND NON-BELIEVERS ARE EITHER PERSECUTED OR KILLED FOR THEIR VIOLATION OF THAT STATE LAW, SINCE SHARIAH LAW IS RELIGIOUS AND STATE LAW WOVEN INTO ONE FABRIC THAT DEMANDS CONFORMITY FROM ALL LIVING IN THAT STATE. Canada has a prime minister who has passed a law forbidding criticism of Islam (all vaguely under the title of hate speech, which could mean anything according to the interpreter), so Islam is the one group with the governmental protection it needs to creep into the rest of government and society. Ironically, the neighbourhoods he will spend the rest of his life in, where the affluent and other trust funds babies live, are far from those of the common people who will have to deal with the consequences of such a short-sighted and even treasonous policy against their nation, way of life, security and democratic freedoms.
if only more Europeans think like you, there wouldn't be a problem anymore, keep posting more of the same
I agree, but would add one comment, our descendants ill very likely find themselves members of a minority group in their birthright nation due to an imbalance in breeding with incoming races and religions wiser Countries and governments impose elements to control this possibility, we just stand and watch apparently. MP's wake up.
But they are not guests. They are invaders.
@@roybarratt2442 The baby boomers in North America were sold a bill of goods when they were instructed in High school not to have more than 2 children in order to keep our population down and allow room for foreigners while the Muslims were told to have as many children as possible to build Islam. Now we are the minority in our own countries.
"Muslim people" ? A contradiction in terms.
This woman is dillusional.
She's also stupid and ignorant.
@@outbackeddie how do YOU know?
@@stevencooper787 Because she opened her mouth and spoke.
No feet washing stations at public airports in the Middle East.
Europe needs a good clean out
When Europeans visit Muslim countries they have to follow their ways ... Especially women who have to wear head scarfs covering their hair and faces, and have to be segregated from men .... how about other regions in the Middle East are forbidden unless it’s Islam how is that okay!? I do not care for your beliefs or traditions you can practice them as you please but at your homes and at your own time period especially if you are immigrating to my country bc that is what I would do integrate, learn your language, laws, culture, and be one with the society I live in!! But you don’t want that and therefor are calling for attention and fear which targets you as a race and people! Example if I am gay and are in an place where people are more conservative/traditional am I going to ignore that and target myself that I well know won’t do me any good unless I am trying to bring attention to myself! You can’t assume that everyone is going to like you and let alone like your beliefs and ways of life period why make yourself and others feel separate and force anyone to change when they didn’t ask you to or aren’t allowed to do the same in your country and then cry about it to make others feel sorry about you as if you are a victim!!! Muslims are well aware that they aren’t in their own countries and yet most don’t give a damn and walk over the laws and ways of their new homes they have made in foreign countries that have given them so much and so many opportunities to assimilate and become one! You can keep your faith and language but don’t come to my country and try to change mine and if you are coming come in legally and be ready to learn our ways just like what we would have to do when we come to your countries!!!!! You want and ask for acceptance but yet you aren’t doing the same for the non-Muslims!!!!! That is what I call hypocritical and ignorant and savage and backwards and radical and intolerable towards all does who do not have the same beliefs as you but yet we have to bc otherwise that is racist or ignorant of us!!!!!!! All I say Karma will get you one day and it will be soon then later!!!!! So keep enjoying the welfare, jobs and the benefits you were given just like any other citizen if not more then the actual natives living there!!!!
Disaster is just around the corner.
This woman has had a heaping helping of Crazy Oats this morning. With extra nuts.
All new nice sounding mumbo jumbo..
.fact is that they operate on the salami slice principle....just when you think they've had enough salami they want another slice.
Correct. And there is a certain cabal that uses false flags to rile them up. View:
1. *Road to World Government - G. Edward Griffin.* (MI64a4P5Xbg)
2. *Usury - The Real Reason The J ews Would Kill Jesus All Over Again* (Cj5nTmTTIoA)
3. *ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS* (QlunSNY5B48)
4. *The Globalist Agenda Explained* by RockingMrE
You let the devil in the car for a ride and soon he wants to drive.
here's an accommodation. SEND THEM BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Importing intolerance and tolerating intolerance is not virtuous
The MOST intolerant people expect others to be TOLERANT of them. This is TOTAL BS!!
Exactly! Refreshing to see your true perspective of the racists and nationalists in the west.
I can think of an appropriate accommodation. It involves a large amount of buses.
What about the African migration into Europe ???
Correction, INVASION, not migration
Same problem, different group, same solution.
@@yahulwagoni4571 What about White South Africans being persecuted?
The only Africans I'd allow into Europe are the White ones from South Africa and Rhodesia (not Zimbabwe btw)
Arabs and Africans are the best immigrants to any country.
it will be an unending disaster and we brought it on ourselves and our descendants .Future generations will curse us for our utter stupidity.
1 Timothy 2-12.
We must not let these estrogen minds to have a voice.
When i hear the word Islam, i immediately think of cruel dictators hiding behind a book, much like the jewish high priests of jesus time.
Seven years old. I remember telling leftys this was coming in the early 00's and was ridiculed. Now you gotta accept it or they call you a islamophobe.
Well, I live in Quebec AND work in a hospital, and guess what? they still make demands. I'm not saying all, but many women want to be treated by women and the men don't want to be touched by women, kinda hard to do when you're coming in for something that is physical. And we cave in because it's easier.
Let them go without medical teeatment if they won’t adhere to our sivication
This is honor .. so proud to hear this
I’m Muslim medical doctor and I always respect the cultural back ground of patients
Himself Lee of course I won’t consider religion or cultural back ground when helping patients, Plus as a Muslim I believe that I’m watched by god and I have to do everything in perfect way in order not to be sinning, we believe that perfecting our jobs is a way of worship too and by doing this god will reward us in the here after.
Tell 'them' to take it(care)or leave it, if they don't t take it,perhaps they will only get sick(er) !!
It is all very well to emphasize the need to accommodate the muslim immigrants BUT without those immigrants having the desire to assimilate ( and that is an issue in the U.K.), then the equality scales are heavily loaded in ONE direction, and will eventually bring severe unrest!
It will be difficult for any migrant population to integrate if they are targeted with hate-speech and tropes based on falsehood.
Is like trying to fit round peg in a sqaure hole, but why? Whose idea is it?
Everything you're saying is all lollipops and sunshine. Europe better grow a pair.
Stop the crazy benefits and they will all go home. They are here for a free ride.
its happening in Canada Ontario as well...
Islam is spreading its ugly head throughout Canada and endangering our citizenry. There are a lot of very angry and pissed off people in every province due to this Muslim influx which our pathetic media will not properly report and a Prime Minister that has exacerbated the situation multi fold.
That may have worked if the Islamics were interested in getting along but they are not and have stated publicly that they intend to take over even here in the U.S.
men and women are going to work in the dark...coming home in the dark...working hard to live...and subsidising people who don't feel like working....whip look at them with contempt as they go off to work in the morning.
For how much longer. That's the question..
There is no accommodation with Islam that is like accommodating the Borg.
...ah, ya gotta love those academics thinking big thoughts in small rooms - kiss!
Are you being sarcastic with that comment?
This is all the Rothschidls attempting to sow division and confusion in European countries to continue their divide and conquer techniques. Simple.
Please learn what Islam really is. Start with ex Muslims. They will tell you the truth. Jews have nothing to do with it. Learn about Mohammad.
What a wonderful treatment of acquiescence and politically correct mumbo jumbo!
I wonder how it would pass if Europeans moved to mainly Muslim countries right now ?
I don't think they would be afforded the courtesies that Europe has extended, things would be a lot different.
I too am glad I won't be around in 2050, I would be 93 .
Greetings From Australia.
Do it instead of asking "what if" and propagating false narratives.
@@NewtralHuman Do what ?
False narrative, please enlighten me !
The flash point is obviously whether europeans will be compelled to obey islamic blasphemy laws. Since this is the main issue, why do you refrain from mentioning it?
Absolutely spot on about mohamadans
Accommodation and respect works both ways.
The principle within the maxim “Live and let live” should be cardinal law and acknowledgement a condition of residence for all. In case of conflicting social norms the established practice of the population prevails. If we all reduced our self centred focus on “the rights of the individual” and made them secondary to the citizens obligation to the society we are in, most divisive issues would disappear.
What a load of waffling. Spit it out, love and get on with it. If you must talk crap at least make it snappy.
We shouldn't be making any accomodations at all, thier the ones that have to change to fit in, if they can't they can bugger off.
Back in Vietnam, the rationale was, "we had to burn the village to save the village." that what she is advocating for Europe.
That's not going to happen thay will not play ball and thay will laugh at you and thay will not take any guidance from and old woman
Like that
Ya that makes sense, run from you enemies (Islam) and then they'll love you. Foolish girl.
Remember Bosnia Herzegovina?
Give them the same respect and accomidation they give you when you go to their country...good luck.
its worse than the 1930s this place at least the people were happy
u
Square pegs and round holes come to mind! It's not rocket science?
Another Barbara Lerner Spectre! Europe MUST become multicultural to survive! LoL
That Jewish woman, who is she speaking on behalf of ?
TIm Smith , I had a hard time understanding her but I know that diversity (allowing mass immigration) will destroy a country. Look at the U.S. they need to start deporting, especially those who refuse to conform.
@@Truther567 I agree, all illegals and bogus refugees in US and Europe should be deported immediately.
Strange, the Governments are unwilling to sort it out, instead they are allowing it to happen and get worse!
May be they are afraid of ignoring orders from Jewish politicians in US responsible for creating the problem !
She sounds like Barbara Lerner Specter
...from the same cabal !
10 years later and Europe has learned nothing.
I often wondered about the prepping community, but I can visualise the scenarios now,
This is from 2011. There are so many now that the looming disaster is for the native euros. To late now.
They never should have been allowed in these European countries to start with, I wonder what genius thought of that?
Their clothing is not the problem, it’s their demands
Big BS
Here, ladies and gents, is a prime example of an argument based on faulty premise, a corrupted and narrow definition of 'accommodation' as the basis for a proposed policy.It is, by reality of 2018, a clear clash of cultures - Western culture/secular laws vs one which marries its highly restrictive laws and government TO religion as a matter of national identity. In fact, in the Middle East (save for Israel) religion defines and controls all countries. 'Accommodation' in the West has already happened, far exceeding freedoms Muslim population may enjoy in the Middle East (which cannot be said the other way around). Her apologist argument calls for the non-Muslim (often already very diverse) section of society to adjust to an incoming and 'already in residence' (in greater numbers) population segment without a reasonable expectation of integration (treating it as some draconian imposition) and, frankly, intolerance of what defined each country over centuries. Apparently unchecked import is a right, as is the foregone conclusion of superiority of pluralism in its most liberal, unsustainable multi-cultural Utopia definition. The take-away should be then (?!) that Western culture, itseems, has not done enough in 'accommodation', by failing to treat one group as more special than everyone else. The argument follows - by failing to do so, Western culture invites well-deserved ire, with only solution to this being to try harder. ... or 'else'.The only suitable 'accommodation', it appears, would be elevation of this particular population segment to a higher prominance, incorporating its religion-based laws into Western law and tolerating its tendency to function as an autonomous sector. It is the most erosive and self-destructive pluralist phylosophy has to offer.
What has been seen in practice over and over is the epic failure of self-segregation (inclusive of no-go zones/ghettos as an extreme by-product) combined with categorical rejection and intolerance of principles which are pillars of Western civilization - yes, those same principles which allowed the (apparently) aggrieved group to settle in Europe and North America in growing numbers while enjoying freedoms and opportunities unheard of in the ME.
While delivered as a reasonable, well thought-out argument, speaker's position is much like a chocolate bonbon presented wrapped in a shiny cellophane wrapper which turns out to be crafted from horse manure. Adding insult to injury, the virtue-signalling woman appears to belong to the very religion existence of which is so bothersome to the one in question. Her culture's 'accommodation' in a most (all?) Middle Eastern countries resulted in complete eradication by decree an/or violence, with those lucky enough to survive incurring a financial penalty as a matter of law ... dictated by religion. Oh, the irony.Seven years after this video with everything that's happened since, I do not expect any change to her stance because it is a mindset based on skewed view of reality, i.e. cognitive dissonance, rather than reality-based assessment. Oh, the tragedy.
Good luck with that "accommodation" Some day you will be asking them for accommodations.
The literal meaning of Islam is "Submission." Educate yourself and your children as to what you are instructed to submit to under Islam and Shariah law.
Disaster of their own making = justice served. I hope not, but everything seems to be going this way and the future of EU seems bloody.
No one voted for any of this. It was forced top-down. The one and only country that put a vote to the people on the topic of racial strangers immigrating into the country was Hungary and over 95% of respondents said no.
ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT, ISLAM IN A MAN IS LIKE RABIES IN A DOG!!!!
The big problem for me is assimilation.
When the easten European countries joined the EU it was very quick, one generation and they were usually culturally indistinguishable. But that appears to only rarely be the case with immigration from middle-easten countries.
What we seem to see instead is a very strong tendancy to form enclaves and resist if not outright reject western values. And this is most evident in the sheer number of westen-born muslims who travelled to join Islamic State, an organisation which openly advertises their western value-opposing culture.