Citröen C5 Aircross 1.5 BlueHDI 130 POV Test Drive + Acceleration 0 - 190 km/h
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- It's very comfy, pretty quiet and nice to sit in. Engine? Nice, aggressive character, but it's weak for this type of car. Such a shame. What do you think? Don't forget to watch also our video with C5 Aircross 2.0 BluHDI - • Citroën C5 Aircross B...
You're PSA experts!!!
DS7
DS7
C5 1.5, 2.0
C3 1.2
and many more cars.
Thank You, guys!!!
The hard plastic is easy to clean, and keep clean. ;)
And uncomfortable as hell when you lean your arm on it for a longer period. Seriosly, my Ford Focus year 2000 had more comfortable arm rest and door.
There is no hard plastic in the doors, it looks like it but it is foamed and soft, atleast in shine trim level
@@carguy_drives But for the price it is not "nice and soft". Don't forget that this car cost the same as a VW Passat.
@@andersnielsen6044 This is true, and if you are buying the car with credit psa have very high interest rate. my father has got a c5 aircross. I have golf 7.5. I would prefer the Citroen but it is too expensive.
I drove this car with a 1.6 turbo petrol and the automatic.
And I drove a Peugeot Rifter with this engine and gearbox.
I really liked both.
Hola. Le agradecería que me dijera, de los dos motores de 131 cv. cual prefiere usted, diesel o gasollina ?
Very strange rev meter. Small and hard to see!
Pozor, aby si sa niekde nerozsekal s takouto agresivnou jazdou.
Marcus zdravíme, řidičovi videa vyřídíme, aby jezdil opatrněji. Díky moc za komentář 👍🏼
Is this engine strong enough for such a big car like this?
Well, it depends up your driving appetite. If you are average or slower driver, it's enough, otherwise we recommend to buy BlueHDi 180 with 2.0 liter diesel engine.
@@muldix I reall don't agree here. The car is not build for 180 hp, the way it drives it not cabable of handling that much power, at all. It is completely waste of money, you are better of going with this engine, and then a shitload of extras and of course the automatic gearbox, this manual gearbox might be the worst presented in 2019..
@@andersnielsen6044 Agree with you, it's always getting more and more power.
Obviously having 2.0 180hp is more flexible than 1.5 with 130HP (more power & torque) but this is not a requirement.
Have driven for 220.000km a 1.7L 115HP SUV with 1.5T as well and this is sufficient; of course the version with 2.0 and 185hp offer more but with all higher cost (buy, insurance, tax ...) and I didn't feel it was required (as long as you don't have to trail a huge weight of course).
@@andersnielsen6044 I agree, the 180 hp is too much for the thin tires and high center of gravity. it is perfect for cruising the motorway at 130-150 kph
I'm first
Hehe, congrats! :)
@@muldix 😂😆💪🏻
I'm second :-D
that car consume more fuel at 190 then bmw x5 or touareg with diesels of 260-300hp