90 second repair time at the start. You sigh and wait it out. Finally getting to a point, you fire the glorious 152 mm gun at an enemy and pop his turret off. Halfway through loading, the tank just randomly explodes and you get crew locked for the suicide xD
"Suspension components fail" Can confirm. The M60 series AVLB we operated in the National Guard had problems with the wheel bearings overheating and failing, sometimes resulting in the road wheels snapping off, with other suspension damage as well. The suspension was weak on the ~55 ton M60 and the AVLB tips the scales at 65 tons, putting further strain on the drivetrain and suspension.
It's never happened on any of my Tank Crews because the driver will get a swift kick in the ass if he didn't have the grease gun out checking Hub temperatures and inspecting the track at every short halt
Needs to be placed in its timeframe. My perspective was as a M60A1 platoon leader/Scout platoon leader during the time M60A2s were fielded. The night vision for 1975-79 was very advanced when everyone else had IR lamps. The tank did not last long enough to get thermal upgrades. The 50 Cal M85 was very good if properly maintained. It required more care than an M2 (I have been the operator of both). The main problem with the M60 was that the electronics of the time were not up to the reliability standards of the solid state stuff that started to come in during the 80s. Recoil and road vibration played havoc with LRUs (Line Replaceable Units or black boxes) for the gun and missile systems. I went into TOW Cobras after my tank days and the TOW system had the same issues but in Aviation we had a much better technical maintenance support than the tank battalions had. The Gun Launcher was ahead of its time. If it had 90s electronics and thermals it would have been much better.
When adding a line such as "as it was rapidly removed from service", it would be an improvement if you could provide the actual timeframe as well (probably even better with a comparison to a closely related vehicle, such as, in this case, the "normal" M60)
these are short vids with the sources bolted on underneath, so if you are REALLY curious, maybe show a flicker of brain activity and look it up yourself. but being a whiney bitch in the comments seems to be all what all but a very slim few can only be. why i dropped my bar long ago and never picked it up again
I’ve gotta say, the Starship is a very unique vehicle with the US Army inventory. It’s one of the only gun-missile tanks deployed in operational service in the United States (alongside the M551 Sheridan), was the first M60 variant to use a laser rangefinder, and has probably one of the coolest turret designs I’ve ever seen.
The starship is one of my favorite tanks conceptually. But even I am aware of its multitude of flaws that got it removed from service after a year and a half. So when I saw this video, my immediate thought was, "You can cover all its problems in 2 and a half minutes?" Bravo.
Ok, not a gamer but I do have 63C experience on the M60A2 from '77-81. (C.4/64 Armor/E 703rd Maint (DS/GS) Aschaffenburg) Portrayal here is accurate. Engine issues due to poor air cleaner blower motors coupled to vehicle charging system. Basically engine starved for air and air filters were not up to the task of filtering fine particulate . And you had to have the ACBM's working for the vehicle charging circuits to work. Two PTO /hydraulic driven Closed Breach Scavenge System fans/pumps driven off the transmission were supposed to aid the gun system clear the bore. System could work with one fan set but had to be "circle X'd" by the company commander or the Bn. XO depending on unit. Regardless, this was unreliable. Most of the time, crews went to MOPP4 or over rode their hatch interrupts and ran with the hatches open in order to breathe. Turret layout sucked. Too low profile. Escpecially if you were over 5ft 6. Most of the interior volume was ate up by the other half of the CBSS and giant sized turret electronic boxes. The gunners image intensifier tube for night sights was a fancy light bulb that cost $62000 to replace and was a throw away item at depot level. You had to dismantle the turret to replace it. Commanders turret /weapons station had its own traverse motor and driveline. Along with non eye safe laser and mechanized M85/M85A1 .50 mount. This station also had space claim issues that literally impacted the gunner in the lower back and ribcage if utilized. (CDRs step mount). Thankfully it had an emergency manual back up system because Normal Mode usually didn't work. 152 conventional rounds were the bane of both the CBSS and the front suspension. They were just too much for that breach and recuperator system. When firing HEP or HEAT , it could crack the 4 front torsion bars if you fired more than 2 rounds back to back quickly. Also when using conventional rounds, the vehicle had a tendency to lift back to the second roadwheel , straining the rest of the trailing suspension. [ I need to add here that the 551 & 551A1 Sheridans , using the same basic cannon /launcher system had the same lifting and suspension issues, but they lifted as far as the 3 road wheel set. On a 5 per side roadwheel suspension ] Turret hydraulics constantly leaked due to lowest bidder getting the hydraulic components contracts. Concepts used were far ahead of their time, or put mildly, were the worst examples of the bleeding edge tech at the time.
As problem ridden of vehicle as it is, I still find the turret very cool! Low profile turrets, while having flaws, are an interesting concept. The Starships certainly was a lesson that the Army learned from.
my father commanded both the m60 and the abrams (He was in around the time they phased out the m60 for the abrams) and he went on several rants about how terrible the m85 was.
it would have been very funny if you included something like "the starships crews suffer a stat reduction due to poor morale because they hated the thing"
Yo man, I know nothing about War Thunder, but your video detailing how bad the Starship is literally the video that introduced me to your channel as a whole. So thank you for that, and here I am.
I am going to have to rewatch the _'Inside the Chieftain's Hatch'_ episode about the "Starship" because may recollection is that it didn't look nearly as cramped as other tanks he has been in.
*Starship fires a shot from a ridge on El Halluf* Tracks break, 3 out of four sprockets break, engine stops working and catches fire, transmission malfunctions, gun breech breaks and then the tank explodes
I swear it would be cool to have chances of failures modeled in Sim battles based on whatever vehicle you're using. It'd be hard af to balance but would give more people a reason to play sim
how would it give more of a reason to play, as a bunch of people would no longer be able to play their favorite tank due to it constantly breaking down
@@meepy546 well my idea is an entire other game mode. I said sim battles but rather than that, it'd be better to just add another mode altogether I guess. Also I don't think it would make sense to make some tanks break down more often than others, just when they occasionally do, make the type of fault congruent with what that tank would experience irl
Nice, my favorite series continues :) I also have a suggestion for you :P "If War Thunder's Spz. Puma Was Historically Accurate", literally hours of content, or possibly even its own mini series given just how fucking muchgajin got wrong with this guy.
Never understood why they didn't continue with this narrow profile design of the turret. Throw out gun launcher and install normal 105mm(or even look into what europeans had cooked up in 120mm), replace faulty electronics with systems that worked. That's basically what modern modernization projects for M60 propose - reworked turret and bigger gun.
Well, the a1 turret is design to have some sort of bolt on composite panel to be attached externally. Of course we know that never happen. If they redesign the a2 turret to fit 105 or 120, what benefit can it brings to the table compare to a1 turret after considering the development cost + and cost of switching to new tooling. Only real benefit is increase protection against fill caliber ap projectile. No one is shooting those in the 70s. You also have to remember at the same time, US is working on the xm1 program. If xm1 failed, then maybe the a2 turret will go somewhere. But xm1 is a success. If you were to modernize m60, xm1 tech would make sense economically and from a performance standpoint.
I think it was Chieftain who recalled a tanker fixing the M85 reliability issues by elevating the belt at feeding point by putting a beer/coke can under it or something like that. Possible modification? EDIT: He mentions that during his feature in Forgotten Weapons Q&A36, time from 3:04 onwards roughly.
Most likely the feeder was missing parts for its mount and was hanging too low. It's basically fixed by aligning the feeder with the gun to give it a more straight feed.
One thing to note is that the original conventional M60 tank turrets taken from the M60A2s were planned to be outfitted to the M48 Patton to create the M48A4.
I worked for the company that Demilled all these between 1995-1998. It was my job to pull them out of the fields and bring them in the building for destruction. None of them had more than 100 miles or 30hrs. I will say that even though thay had been sitting for 20 years before I got them, that with a jump start, every one of them started right up and ran. I drove every one like I stole it 1 last time untill the fuel was empty and them they got torn apart and cut up in 5x5 chunks.
Hey spookston, I was looking at Apex computers and when I saw your partnership on there it said world of tanks isntewd of War thunder, thought you should know. :)
You mean as a heat slinger? Unless it shoots tandem atgms that go very fast and it has composite armor, this thing isnt going to work well, although I certainly wish it did
We have that in Panzer war and i love to play that tank, 108mm of HE pen is just insane plus the missiles with 800 mm of pen Makes it better, it's one my favorite besides the KV2. ( in panzer war only )
Imagine WT but minmal crew level to "crew" aswell as the current minimal to ace. Damn lmao not only do you have to grind SL & RP, you also have to grind crew XP kekw.
Perhaps the M60A2 Starship would have been marginally more effective if it had been equipped with the XM66 Type C turret which was essentially a larger Sheridan-style turret.
Can you make a historically accurate video about the F-14 when it come out Spook? Edit: Btw I love your vids especially the historically accurate ones❤️
I served on the M60 series of tanks (M60,M60A1,M60A3) for 15 years before converting to the M1 The only problem we had with the m85 was when they were more than 10 years old and worn out. The same goes for the Engine Drivetrain Track and Suspension. I served on M60's in all types of terrain from the Snows of Germany to the Mountains of Fort Carson or the Deserts of Fort Irwin and never saw the problems you are claiming if the crew was doing it's proper PMCS maintenance !!!
If the M60A2 was put into service earlier, say ten years so, so you think it would have had a better reputation? Since it would have been so much ahead of the curve technology wise?
Hey on a completely unrelated note GHPC just released their steam demo, and I think it would be nice if you did an update on the game and got the word out.
I've recently started playing this thing again because my life sucks so it should reflect in war thunder. Its not great...by a long shot and it does suck, but having that in mind and playing extremely conservative with it has lead to some of the most fun matches and extremely satisfying kills with it. Had like 5+ kills with this thing in about 15+ matches.
I've been meaning to know why the M46 Patten tank considered a 7.0 tank. Wouldn't it be 5.0 or something since the weapons it has are more ww2 then cold war?
How about we leave out “increase in repair costs” cause Gajin already balances like that and they need to stop. It doesn’t work and only frustrates players
"Smoldering residue left over from previous firings can prematurely detonate loaded ammunition" Isn't that a problem with all firearms for as long as they've existed? How much worse is it with this gun? Are you sure it's not improper handling?
Imagine spawning in a Starship and immediately getting fucked by all the mechanical issues at once
90 second repair time at the start. You sigh and wait it out. Finally getting to a point, you fire the glorious 152 mm gun at an enemy and pop his turret off. Halfway through loading, the tank just randomly explodes and you get crew locked for the suicide xD
@@BoomchacleV0 it seems like something gaijin would implement if they could
You mean besides the usual fucking the Snail hands out ( perpetually uptiered, spawnsniped, teamkilled/bullied, etc.)?
@@obsidianjane4413 dont forget ww2 tanks fighting ATGM carriers
@@intellectualbaguette7507 only on the American and minor nations though.
You forgot to include that historically, the starship could activate its hyperspace engine, because it's a starship.
Haha! Yes😂
Team: Attack the B point!
Me: Hyperspace travels all the way to B point
You spend 0.25 seconds too lang in the warp and end up on the other side of the world
Starship is supposed to be for a jet fighter in my opinion but it's an awesome tank name non the less even though it doesnt make much sense
No
"Suspension components fail"
Can confirm. The M60 series AVLB we operated in the National Guard had problems with the wheel bearings overheating and failing, sometimes resulting in the road wheels snapping off, with other suspension damage as well.
The suspension was weak on the ~55 ton M60 and the AVLB tips the scales at 65 tons, putting further strain on the drivetrain and suspension.
Thanks for sharing.
Am interested on what Terrain or Driving missions did you guys do and what makes those failures happen often?
It's never happened on any of my Tank Crews because the driver will get a swift kick in the ass if he didn't have the grease gun out checking Hub temperatures and inspecting the track at every short halt
@@JNF590 It was on a road march, for several hours without stopping.
You forgot to add that, historically, it was so cool that the enemy surrendered immediately in awe of its space aesthetics.
tumor turret tumor turret
Sheridan: "Ooh! Ooh! I've seen this one before!"
Abrams: "What do you mean you've seen this one before? It's brand new."
Needs to be placed in its timeframe. My perspective was as a M60A1 platoon leader/Scout platoon leader during the time M60A2s were fielded. The night vision for 1975-79 was very advanced when everyone else had IR lamps. The tank did not last long enough to get thermal upgrades. The 50 Cal M85 was very good if properly maintained. It required more care than an M2 (I have been the operator of both). The main problem with the M60 was that the electronics of the time were not up to the reliability standards of the solid state stuff that started to come in during the 80s. Recoil and road vibration played havoc with LRUs (Line Replaceable Units or black boxes) for the gun and missile systems. I went into TOW Cobras after my tank days and the TOW system had the same issues but in Aviation we had a much better technical maintenance support than the tank battalions had. The Gun Launcher was ahead of its time. If it had 90s electronics and thermals it would have been much better.
When adding a line such as "as it was rapidly removed from service", it would be an improvement if you could provide the actual timeframe as well (probably even better with a comparison to a closely related vehicle, such as, in this case, the "normal" M60)
these are short vids with the sources bolted on underneath, so if you are REALLY curious, maybe show a flicker of brain activity and look it up yourself. but being a whiney bitch in the comments seems to be all what all but a very slim few can only be. why i dropped my bar long ago and never picked it up again
I’ve gotta say, the Starship is a very unique vehicle with the US Army inventory. It’s one of the only gun-missile tanks deployed in operational service in the United States (alongside the M551 Sheridan), was the first M60 variant to use a laser rangefinder, and has probably one of the coolest turret designs I’ve ever seen.
If it had a different cupola it would've been a very well protected and low silhouette turret it seems
It was never called "starship". That was the sarcastic nickname one crew gave their specific M60A2.
@@obsidianjane4413 Still a cool nickname nonetheless
@@obsidianjane4413 yeah but nowadays everyone calls it "starship"
@@FedorFox If War Thunder's M60A2 Starship Was Historically Accurate....
The starship is one of my favorite tanks conceptually. But even I am aware of its multitude of flaws that got it removed from service after a year and a half. So when I saw this video, my immediate thought was, "You can cover all its problems in 2 and a half minutes?" Bravo.
More historically accurate? Today's gonna be a good day
Ok, not a gamer but I do have 63C experience on the M60A2 from '77-81. (C.4/64 Armor/E 703rd Maint (DS/GS) Aschaffenburg)
Portrayal here is accurate.
Engine issues due to poor air cleaner blower motors coupled to vehicle charging system. Basically engine starved for air and air filters were not up to the task of filtering fine particulate . And you had to have the ACBM's working for the vehicle charging circuits to work.
Two PTO /hydraulic driven Closed Breach Scavenge System fans/pumps driven off the transmission were supposed to aid the gun system clear the bore. System could work with one fan set but had to be "circle X'd" by the company commander or the Bn. XO depending on unit. Regardless, this was unreliable. Most of the time, crews went to MOPP4 or over rode their hatch interrupts and ran with the hatches open in order to breathe.
Turret layout sucked. Too low profile. Escpecially if you were over 5ft 6. Most of the interior volume was ate up by the other half of the CBSS and giant sized turret electronic boxes.
The gunners image intensifier tube for night sights was a fancy light bulb that cost $62000 to replace and was a throw away item at depot level. You had to dismantle the turret to replace it.
Commanders turret /weapons station had its own traverse motor and driveline. Along with non eye safe laser and mechanized M85/M85A1 .50 mount. This station also had space claim issues that literally impacted the gunner in the lower back and ribcage if utilized. (CDRs step mount). Thankfully it had an emergency manual back up system because Normal Mode usually didn't work.
152 conventional rounds were the bane of both the CBSS and the front suspension. They were just too much for that breach and recuperator system. When firing HEP or HEAT , it could crack the 4 front torsion bars if you fired more than 2 rounds back to back quickly. Also when using conventional rounds, the vehicle had a tendency to lift back to the second roadwheel , straining the rest of the trailing suspension. [ I need to add here that the 551 & 551A1 Sheridans , using the same basic cannon /launcher system had the same lifting and suspension issues, but they lifted as far as the 3 road wheel set. On a 5 per side roadwheel suspension ]
Turret hydraulics constantly leaked due to lowest bidder getting the hydraulic components contracts.
Concepts used were far ahead of their time, or put mildly, were the worst examples of the bleeding edge tech at the time.
Very informative regarding your statement. Thanks for sharing this 👍 👍👍
I love how most of the time when he lists out issues it's typically followed by a "This is fixed with this upgrade/program," but not here.
As problem ridden of vehicle as it is, I still find the turret very cool! Low profile turrets, while having flaws, are an interesting concept. The Starships certainly was a lesson that the Army learned from.
To every tank that exist, spookston say twice "it's cramped"
If Spookston was historically accurate
my father commanded both the m60 and the abrams (He was in around the time they phased out the m60 for the abrams) and he went on several rants about how terrible the m85 was.
it would have been very funny if you included something like "the starships crews suffer a stat reduction due to poor morale because they hated the thing"
it would be pretty fun if the next april fools event would be "Historically Accurate Tanks"
“Increased repair costs”
Oh god pls no
Yo man, I know nothing about War Thunder, but your video detailing how bad the Starship is literally the video that introduced me to your channel as a whole. So thank you for that, and here I am.
I am going to have to rewatch the _'Inside the Chieftain's Hatch'_ episode about the "Starship" because may recollection is that it didn't look nearly as cramped as other tanks he has been in.
*Starship fires a shot from a ridge on El Halluf*
Tracks break, 3 out of four sprockets break, engine stops working and catches fire, transmission malfunctions, gun breech breaks and then the tank explodes
Next mark fellon video: what if the starship could go interstellar
I swear it would be cool to have chances of failures modeled in Sim battles based on whatever vehicle you're using. It'd be hard af to balance but would give more people a reason to play sim
No
how would it give more of a reason to play, as a bunch of people would no longer be able to play their favorite tank due to it constantly breaking down
@@meepy546 well my idea is an entire other game mode. I said sim battles but rather than that, it'd be better to just add another mode altogether I guess. Also I don't think it would make sense to make some tanks break down more often than others, just when they occasionally do, make the type of fault congruent with what that tank would experience irl
Nice, my favorite series continues :) I also have a suggestion for you :P "If War Thunder's Spz. Puma Was Historically Accurate", literally hours of content, or possibly even its own mini series given just how fucking muchgajin got wrong with this guy.
Imagine trying to ambush an enemy missing the first shot and the main gun jams...
Never understood why they didn't continue with this narrow profile design of the turret. Throw out gun launcher and install normal 105mm(or even look into what europeans had cooked up in 120mm), replace faulty electronics with systems that worked. That's basically what modern modernization projects for M60 propose - reworked turret and bigger gun.
Look at the Merkava Mk.I and IIs. It borrowed the same narrow wedge shaped turret design.
Well, the a1 turret is design to have some sort of bolt on composite panel to be attached externally. Of course we know that never happen.
If they redesign the a2 turret to fit 105 or 120, what benefit can it brings to the table compare to a1 turret after considering the development cost + and cost of switching to new tooling. Only real benefit is increase protection against fill caliber ap projectile. No one is shooting those in the 70s.
You also have to remember at the same time, US is working on the xm1 program. If xm1 failed, then maybe the a2 turret will go somewhere.
But xm1 is a success. If you were to modernize m60, xm1 tech would make sense economically and from a performance standpoint.
@@jintsuubest9331 but it didn't in the end. US M60 weren't updated to either Block III or M60-2000. Which can be seen as a mistake bowadays.
have a suggestion for the tanks that should be added to war thunder:
The 2cv GHAN 1
its not a tank but maybe a fun spaa for low tier france
I think it was Chieftain who recalled a tanker fixing the M85 reliability issues by elevating the belt at feeding point by putting a beer/coke can under it or something like that. Possible modification?
EDIT: He mentions that during his feature in Forgotten Weapons Q&A36, time from 3:04 onwards roughly.
Most likely the feeder was missing parts for its mount and was hanging too low. It's basically fixed by aligning the feeder with the gun to give it a more straight feed.
One thing to note is that the original conventional M60 tank turrets taken from the M60A2s were planned to be outfitted to the M48 Patton to create the M48A4.
If these things were in game getting kills in this tank would be a community wide challenge lmao
First time ive been awake when a video has been uploaded
I worked for the company that Demilled all these between 1995-1998. It was my job to pull them out of the fields and bring them in the building for destruction. None of them had more than 100 miles or 30hrs. I will say that even though thay had been sitting for 20 years before I got them, that with a jump start, every one of them started right up and ran. I drove every one like I stole it 1 last time untill the fuel was empty and them they got torn apart and cut up in 5x5 chunks.
If any of actual accuracies were ever put into a game the game would be so fucking miserable everybody would hate it
But... everyone already hates it...
Having been inside one of these in a museum, they are super cramped. It's still cool to look at though
My favourite series !
Hey spookston, I was looking at Apex computers and when I saw your partnership on there it said world of tanks isntewd of War thunder, thought you should know. :)
They should add EXTREM REALISTIC mod for this man
One of the best decisions gaijin has ever made is to not implement a spontaneous failure mechanic
There's a destroyed one on a demo range at Fort Knox. Wish i had the opportunity to get pictures of it
Ι love your videos they are always there for some pretty trying times :)
Here at AIT at Ft Lee Virginia. We have a starship at the ordinance museum. Pretty cool
Yay, new spacetime upload
I find it hilarious that the M85 was just so terrible they just went back to using the M2
I think the lack of parts should leed to a chans that you spawn with a damaged tank that can't be repaired beyond its spawn state.
What I've taken from this. A Tiger tank seems more reliable
Me: how did this ever get accepted??
Video: *“…It was every expensive”*
Me: ah, that’s why
With todays new technology this would be cool tank
You mean as a heat slinger? Unless it shoots tandem atgms that go very fast and it has composite armor, this thing isnt going to work well, although I certainly wish it did
We have that in Panzer war and i love to play that tank, 108mm of HE pen is just insane plus the missiles with 800 mm of pen
Makes it better, it's one my favorite besides the KV2. ( in panzer war only )
Hey spookston
In an earlier video you stayed that they waited for the ammo cook-off problems to be resolved before putting the gun into the m60
I always call this tank the Jefferson Starship because it's just fun to call it that.
Damn I always knew this tank was bad IRL but didn't know that it was so bad.
Imagine WT but minmal crew level to "crew" aswell as the current minimal to ace. Damn lmao not only do you have to grind SL & RP, you also have to grind crew XP kekw.
Perhaps the M60A2 Starship would have been marginally more effective if it had been equipped with the XM66 Type C turret which was essentially a larger Sheridan-style turret.
this video gave me willpower to go and grind american tanks to get the m60a2 thank you spook i love you
1:47 - Shhh… don’t tell Gajin this
oi bruv spookston uploaded
If war thunder tanks were historically accurate like 90% of them would be broken down on the side of the road.
The m85 machine gun was fairly easy to work on the real m60a2. For real crews we did real good with the tank m60a2.
funny death position in the first scene
If it was historically accurate, it wouldn't be called 'Starship' :^)
Do an R3 one if you haven't done it yet .Would be interesting if that thing can deliver Pizzas and kill terrorists at the same time.
Are you ready for an hour long video?
@@obsidianjane4413 yes , aren't you?
great idea! make the most unreliable tank MORE unreliable.
that way, they'll have to get rid of it!
Your choice of music reminds me.of Battle Tanx Global Assault
Can you make a historically accurate video about the F-14 when it come out Spook?
Edit: Btw I love your vids especially the historically accurate ones❤️
Can you do a vid about if shells were historically accurate series?
I served on the M60 series of tanks (M60,M60A1,M60A3) for 15 years before converting to the M1
The only problem we had with the m85 was when they were more than 10 years old
and worn out.
The same goes for the Engine Drivetrain Track and Suspension.
I served on M60's in all types of terrain from the Snows of Germany to the Mountains of Fort Carson or the Deserts of Fort Irwin and never saw the problems you are claiming if the crew was doing it's proper PMCS maintenance !!!
If the M60A2 was put into service earlier, say ten years so, so you think it would have had a better reputation? Since it would have been so much ahead of the curve technology wise?
It was already cutting edge/ ahead of its time. I doubt the electronics would have been ready/practical.
Your question was answer by mbt70. Answer is no.
Has anyone ever seen more than two M60A2s in any game? I really don’t think I have. Hmmmm.
Hey on a completely unrelated note GHPC just released their steam demo, and I think it would be nice if you did an update on the game and got the word out.
I've recently started playing this thing again because my life sucks so it should reflect in war thunder. Its not great...by a long shot and it does suck, but having that in mind and playing extremely conservative with it has lead to some of the most fun matches and extremely satisfying kills with it. Had like 5+ kills with this thing in about 15+ matches.
I see that you've increased the time the texts appear on screen. Shame, it was a nice mini game pausing and unpausing to be able to read it :D
Can u talk about repair cost? I feel like you are the only one that gaijin listens to
According to this video he would want to raise repair costs. Careful what you ask for...
@@obsidianjane4413 chill im talking about repair cost in general not just for this vehicle. Careful about what u say
Imagine if gamemode bosed of this series - hell
Can you do a M1 abrams historically accurate
Episode on the panzer 3 please attempt #20
Do you have any plans to do another sprocket video?
It was never f'kin' called "Starship" for the love of gawd!!!
Can you do a t10m next?
So you had to wish upon a star to get the bloody thing to work? Explains the name I guess.
my man what is the point of linking the 2nd channel if it barely has any posts, like my guy the last post was 4 months ago
I've been meaning to know why the M46 Patten tank considered a 7.0 tank. Wouldn't it be 5.0 or something since the weapons it has are more ww2 then cold war?
It would be very funny if gaijin made "Historically accurate battles" for aprill fools
Why cant aps be used on tops of tanks to stop thinks like the nlaw and javelin
Question: why was this tank nicknamed the "starship"
Make a video of italian M14/40 or M11/39, please!!!🙏
How about we leave out “increase in repair costs” cause Gajin already balances like that and they need to stop. It doesn’t work and only frustrates players
The M60A2 is my most hated tank in the American tree and I never have a good game while using it
so, expensive and something is constantly failing.
my life in one line too poor tank.
"Smoldering residue left over from previous firings can prematurely detonate loaded ammunition"
Isn't that a problem with all firearms for as long as they've existed? How much worse is it with this gun? Are you sure it's not improper handling?
Ah yes, more things for realism thunder
would it be possible if they can replace that shitty gun to l7 105mm?
Nah,
It has only 2 crew, and can survive 3 hits from an AT rounds
Deffenitly the best tank in the world
So basically it would suck in every way possible..
crews of only level 100? lol expert crews only not aces!
Only good thing about starship is it's name lmao
Ooof, I knew there was a reason I never like the Starshit......thing is a smokin' hot mess.
What works on the starship?
Nothing....
10 k repair cost. Why in 8.0kb all america tanks cost too much.
I think its better if everything you complained about not being historically accurate stayed the way it is