60hz 1 frame 16.66ms 120hz 1 frame 8.33ms 144hz 1 frame 6.94ms 240hz 1 frame 4.17ms 360hz 1 frame 2.78ms 480hz 1 frame 2.08ms I would recommend to go from 60 to 144 and then to 360 those are the biggest jumps in motion clarity. I haven't seen a single IPS panel that can keep up with the pixel response time of 2.08ms needed for 100% compliance on 480hz so if you are rich and a maniac you would have to buy a Zowie TN panel or OLED.
@@Eclipse-u9d Nah~ Monitor manufacturers will release a 2000hz monitor and some morons out there will buy them and claim that they can see the difference. People are already doing it with 8K polling rate mice lol.
@@NyangisKhanI'm sure someone can do the math because the way response time is affected isn't linear. But you can even see a difference in motion clarity between 360 hz to 540. So I'm sure a hypothetical jump from 1000 to 2000 is notable. There is a noticble difference but Is it worth it? Fuck no. Mice polling rates are different in my opinion theres even worse diminishing returns.
@@shroomgerm I have several 8K mice Endgame OP1, Maya X , Viper V3 Pro, etc. To be honest is not worth to go above 4K the CPU consumption is way too high on 8K and that also affects the system overall latency which is no good for FPS games, my CPU is the 12700K tho it probably works better on something like 7800X3D - 9800X3D.
Recently tried a QLED TV and the blacks look incredible compared to my TN monitor. My next upgrade will definitely be an OLED monitor, it's a night and day difference in color reproduction.
Dont get OLED, brightness sucks, text clarity sucks (non-RGB subpixel layout) and worst of all, it only lasts 2-3 years before burn in happens. Dont listen to OLED fanboys, burn in is still a thing and is GUARANTEED to happen. Its not a matter of if but when. Burn in is inherent to OLED technology. There is no one who has an OLED for more than 5 years without burn in or some other panel degradation. If they say they have one, they are lying (OLED fanboys are good at that). Get a normal LCD if you plan on using your monitor for more than 3 years. Mini LED is the best since it has 90% as good blacks as OLED but lasts as long if not longer than normal LCD monitors. Btw, I have OLED so you know I'm not biased.
I had a 4:3 CRT monitor until 2010, I was fine until I upgraded to 144 later in 2010, it was world changing as I was playing competitive games, and I always wanted to be the best. Then 240Hz monitors came along, while I didn’t buy one myself, i tried them at a local gaming center where you could pay hourly to play, I noticed a difference but not to a degree where 144 wasn’t playable at all, I do as easily perform on 144 as I could on 240. Now in 2024 I do have a monitor that can hit 240, but only because that’s the lowest OLED monitors can hit. While I never enjoyed 60fps/hz to this day, OLED for some reason makes even 60 feel somewhat smooth compared to other panel types, this is my experience with monitors.
Actually turning off vsync and letting the fps go wild massively reduces the response times from mouse click to monitor screen and the screen tearing isnt really a thing anymore atleast i havent experienced it after going from 60hz laptop ddr4 8gb 30fps to 144hz/165hz 1080p 144/165 to 500fps
@@kyrylobordiuh3996 Why would you buy a 2048x2048 monitor at 27"? A 4K monitor can do flawless scaling through integer down to 1080p. Regardless, the PPI at 27" is miles, miles, better than a 27" 1440p (which you meant to say) display.
I’ve recently upgraded to a MSI 341CQPX (240hz qdoled ultrawide) the motion clarity is amazing compared to my 165hz VA. Managed to get it brand new for “only” £650 which is great price for the UK.
I ran into a weird situation with monitors as well. Bought a pc and 240 hz monitor at the same time. I play CS mainly so it was easy to hit. Then Valorant came out so I went to try it and I got about 160-235 fps in the game and they don't allow you to go below your max monitor refresh rate...I've upgraded my pc again and will be in the same boat again in maybe a year or two *shrug*
Be careful with monitor and gpu ports. I wanted a real upgrade from QHD ultra wide 165hz ips to a 240hz UHD oled ultra wide and that can only be achieved with dp 2.1. No gpu has display port 2.1 and unfortunately Nvidia is rumored to have a dp 2.1 on 5000 series gpu(sucks for me as I just got 4070ti at release)
unless that monitor was the Odyssey Neo G9 (which is Mini LED, not OLED), then thats not true. With DSC you can run 4K 240Hz with either HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.4.
@ aw, sick! I found a Compaq FS600E that was never taken out of its original box. 1024x768 85Hz, was an absolute blast to use until the capacitor decided enough was enough
Hey honestly was wondering if you thought of doing a review on the Pulsar X3 when it comes out. Supposed to come out November 29th and it’s a G703 clone that’s super lightweight. Thought it would be nice to see a review from you. Thank you!
Hey man I was wondering if you could do a video about the best mouse for Rainbow Six Siege like you did with CS and Valorant. I know they take a lot of work but the new major is happening right now and I’ve seen a lot of clear angles for most teams.
Budget monitors are within swinging distance of what the expensive monitors can do. Judging by the somewhat premium monitor I bought (as "Used - Acceptable" on Amazon), it's not night and day, and I don't miss it when I'm sneaking some gaming in on my parent's $100 random Acer 1080p60 monitor they bought years ago, on their Ryzen APU office PC. Okay, 120Hz+ has been nice. Good colors are nice to have (I think?), but whatever. I still enjoy gaming on anything that has a screen, pretty much. Basic monitors are marvels of engineering already. Sure, fancier monitors are impressive, especially in theory, but the diminishing returns are massive when budget stuff is so good. My 2 cents. If people want to geek out and splurge on that, more power to them I guess. But it's not essential IMO. I don't play multiplayer, so FPS above about 90-120Hz is probably wasted on me, but having had access to 240Hz I struggle to consciously tell a difference between that and 120, and I have often locked games to 120Hz for stability reasons and have enjoyed it quite a bit that way. (A lot of games are hard to run above 60FPS, let alone above 90 or 120!) Games that lock themselves to 60FPS are still very fun for me. I do believe there are benefits to "better tech", but they are increasingly situational the "better" the specs get. I'd say anything 120Hz+, with a size and resolution that's practical for the intended use, it's very hard to get an actually bad monitor. (60 is nice, but 120 is worth it in a lot of games and costs hardly much more than 60 anymore.)
Maybe I didn’t catch it, however what is also worth mentioning is that you don’t neet 1440p resolution on monitors below 27 inches. FullHD - max 24 inches 1440p - from 27 inches
@@yarincool1237 No one said it doesnt look better. Its just that you probably dont use 100% scaling in your desktop meaning you probably use 125 or 150% scaling which is the equivalent to 1080p which defeats the purpose of buying a higher res display.
Is it true that if you have 240 hz monitor,for example, and play comparative games without hitting 240 hz - it is better to switch to a monitor with lower fps? For example you play Fortnite with 230-235 fps on avarage and it is better to switch to 180 hz monitor just to make them lock in one number? Sorry for mistakes - English not my first language,but I hope you understood the point 😊
No not true, if you get 180 fps on average and you're on a 144hz monitor upgrading to a 240hz monitor wouldn't be worth it (40hz increase). However, if you're achieving 230fps it it definitely worth making the upgrade (86hz increase)
@@sclpl90 i’ve had a great time with it. My eyes are pretty meh but there’s basically no ghosting and the speakers are better than expected. Definitely pick it up if it’s still on sale
the best monitor or pc part, its the one you can actually afford, get anything above 120hz and be happy... i'm currently eyeballing Xiaomi Mini LED G Pro 27i to be my partner for the next 5-6 years
I have the same one. I still wish i had an oled But this would hold good for a year or two then 480hz+ oled glossy would be great for me. Or just get oled vr.
i had a qd ips 1440p 165hz monitor, msi optix it was actually great but the backlight died out on me so imma get the msi one on sale on amazon rn for 500
if you can't reach 240 frames on your 240hz monitor you might wanna consider becoming a stretched res gamer for competitive fps. just going 16:10 can already help
I went with ips 1440p 180hz monitor for 200$ which is pretty much acceptable in my opinion and its 24 inch which is not ez to find I found an 240hz option but its 27 inch which is on the big side for me and my gou is rtx 3060 so i wont get those fps on any game other then valorant
I'd figured that anyone who has over 10K views for pretty much every video had "made it" and was a full on successful TH-camr. To think that's not enough to make loads'a'money is kind of mind boggling to me. Damn.
I have an Asus PG248QP 540hz it is the fastest LCD monitor right now it has 1.4ms response Time at 540hz at OD normal settings at OD eSports settings it has 0.9 average response Time but it has higher overshoot zowie xl2586x has 2.45 Ms response Time at 540hz which is too slow compared to the Asus model but I think 1440p OLED 480hz monitor is the best monitor in the world because of better colors, 0.3ms response Time, higher resolution and infinite contrast.
Be me: Buys the aqdp Upgrades pc on the launch of 9800x3d (first self built pc) Game has dips is unplayable Returns 7900xtx thinking it might have been issue with it and gets 4080 Stutter still remains decides to use it on old pc it works well and uses old power supply to check if it’s an issue with that and no issues Replaces ram still no luck then the motherboard board still no luck Finally decides to replace cpu next replacement comes 12th December And refunded the gpu Sold old pc yesterday Now stuck like a dumb ass with no pc and bored, thinking of returning the entire thing until I get the replacement cpu just to be on the safe side Now thinking should I just wait for 50 series and get both gpu and monitor till then? TL;DR did dumb things and stuck without a gaming setup and thinking of should I wait till the launch of 50 series or not
You're not entirely right about getting no benefit from a higher refresh rate if you can't output an equally high fps. Watch 3kliksphilip's video' The Benefits of a High Refresh rate Monitor' for the breakdown.
1440P is a huge competitive advantage IMO and pros need to move to it, it helps you spot and aim so much easier even in games like csgo and valorant, and its even more of an advantage in games like pubg and tarkov, also IPS over TN any day so you can see thee game and enemies clearer, i dont care how fast TN and 1080P is, it looks so bad that its a disadvantage, also in competitive games theres no FPS diffrence as pros and competitive players play on low and these games are CPU bound anyway.
they won't move to 1440p unless we get an actually good cpu and gpu upgrades, for now nvidia, and and intel are just milking money from us lol. for pros it's much more important to play at 540 fps than having a clearer image since they play on 24 inch screens anyway
also they like 24 inches because the screen is just smaller so they can see it all at once, buying a 1440p and if you need scaling down to 1080p is very bad it's gonna extremely blurry compared to base 1080p, 4k would be better but then you definitely won't play 4k on competitive games anytime soon
@aleks-lj9yq AOC AGON PRO AG276QZD Ive seen the reviews and decided to pull the trigger on it, there was a QD-OLED remaster of the monitor for the same price, but it was fairly new and didn't have many reviews.
in my 8 years of being a PC gamer. higher hz = smoother screen tn < IPS < OLED = better looking screen. gsync freesync = smoother gaming, less screen tearing 1080p
99% Players only need 144hz i recommend OLED.. If youre trying to go pro NO you dont need 240hz plus still get 144hz then upgrade if you actually make it anywhere
Not really. No professional esports fps game(cs2,r6,apex,fortnite) etc supply 480hz montiors for pro players in LAN tournaments. 480fps is extremely difficult to achieve on a fps title. most pros also just aren't experts on equipment anyways, they just use whatever.
not buying anything under 1000hz
8khz minimum dawg
@@ascruffmcgruf yes ofc man i have 8k hz on every thing i have especially 8k hz on my mousepad
@@breacherguy8038 bro you don’t have 8khz on your gaming table?
@@Loser-io8mx my lucky gaming jorts have 8k polling compatibility
@@Pividol my underwear runs at 16khz
Mointer killed me
how did you type this comment then? 😮
Mointer sounds like some forgotten British insult
60hz 1 frame 16.66ms
120hz 1 frame 8.33ms
144hz 1 frame 6.94ms
240hz 1 frame 4.17ms
360hz 1 frame 2.78ms
480hz 1 frame 2.08ms
I would recommend to go from 60 to 144 and then to 360 those are the biggest jumps in motion clarity.
I haven't seen a single IPS panel that can keep up with the pixel response time of 2.08ms needed for 100% compliance on 480hz so if you are rich and a maniac you would have to buy a Zowie TN panel or OLED.
Tbh just jump to 240hz and stick to it until 500 to 1000 he becomes normal lmao
@@YounesMahfoud-vd2emyeah like 1000hz probably will be the last refresh rate upgrade anyway
@@Eclipse-u9d Nah~ Monitor manufacturers will release a 2000hz monitor and some morons out there will buy them and claim that they can see the difference. People are already doing it with 8K polling rate mice lol.
@@NyangisKhanI'm sure someone can do the math because the way response time is affected isn't linear. But you can even see a difference in motion clarity between 360 hz to 540. So I'm sure a hypothetical jump from 1000 to 2000 is notable. There is a noticble difference but Is it worth it? Fuck no. Mice polling rates are different in my opinion theres even worse diminishing returns.
@@shroomgerm I have several 8K mice Endgame OP1, Maya X , Viper V3 Pro, etc. To be honest is not worth to go above 4K the CPU consumption is way too high on 8K and that also affects the system overall latency which is no good for FPS games, my CPU is the 12700K tho it probably works better on something like 7800X3D - 9800X3D.
“My ignorance has given me low standards that I’m completely happy with.”
Key to happiness
Recently tried a QLED TV and the blacks look incredible compared to my TN monitor. My next upgrade will definitely be an OLED monitor, it's a night and day difference in color reproduction.
@@Knox420 QLEDs do if they are miniled and have local dimming. Are you sl0w? Regardless, literally any panel tech look better than a TN.
Dont get OLED, brightness sucks, text clarity sucks (non-RGB subpixel layout) and worst of all, it only lasts 2-3 years before burn in happens. Dont listen to OLED fanboys, burn in is still a thing and is GUARANTEED to happen. Its not a matter of if but when. Burn in is inherent to OLED technology. There is no one who has an OLED for more than 5 years without burn in or some other panel degradation. If they say they have one, they are lying (OLED fanboys are good at that). Get a normal LCD if you plan on using your monitor for more than 3 years. Mini LED is the best since it has 90% as good blacks as OLED but lasts as long if not longer than normal LCD monitors. Btw, I have OLED so you know I'm not biased.
Wait a minute mate, my head is spinning from all those acronyms.
save me black friday... black friday save me..
My TUF VG27aq - 1440p 165hz 5 years Old is still GOAT
here's a trick i do to love my current monitor: don't use it in the dark
feiner
I had a 4:3 CRT monitor until 2010, I was fine until I upgraded to 144 later in 2010, it was world changing as I was playing competitive games, and I always wanted to be the best. Then 240Hz monitors came along, while I didn’t buy one myself, i tried them at a local gaming center where you could pay hourly to play, I noticed a difference but not to a degree where 144 wasn’t playable at all, I do as easily perform on 144 as I could on 240. Now in 2024 I do have a monitor that can hit 240, but only because that’s the lowest OLED monitors can hit. While I never enjoyed 60fps/hz to this day, OLED for some reason makes even 60 feel somewhat smooth compared to other panel types, this is my experience with monitors.
You didn't run your CRT on 100hz did ya?
@@triplespace007 some guns could run at 160Hz
Great video. Hope to see a Fantech Aria 2 review in the future!
i was just looking to pick up a new monitor, ty for the vid!
Actually turning off vsync and letting the fps go wild massively reduces the response times from mouse click to monitor screen and the screen tearing isnt really a thing anymore atleast i havent experienced it after going from 60hz laptop ddr4 8gb 30fps to 144hz/165hz 1080p 144/165 to 500fps
Seeing some roguelites in that library, nice 👍
Should I buy a 4K 144Hz IPS monitor or a 1440p 240Hz OLED monitor at 27 inches?
If you play a lot of single player games => 4k 144hz, competitive => 2k 240hz.
upd.: sry, for 27 inches just buy 2k monitor.
@@David-Gaming1337 Trust me, go for the oled, it is a HUGE difference to IPS, you won't regret it
oled any day, dont even consider ips as an option
@@kyrylobordiuh3996 Why would you buy a 2048x2048 monitor at 27"? A 4K monitor can do flawless scaling through integer down to 1080p. Regardless, the PPI at 27" is miles, miles, better than a 27" 1440p (which you meant to say) display.
The comments I was looking for to justify me spending 300€ extra!😅
I’ve recently upgraded to a MSI 341CQPX (240hz qdoled ultrawide) the motion clarity is amazing compared to my 165hz VA. Managed to get it brand new for “only” £650 which is great price for the UK.
Just got an acer xv273k v3. Really happy with it. Bought it off acer's ebay store, but it came with a stuck pixel
I ran into a weird situation with monitors as well. Bought a pc and 240 hz monitor at the same time. I play CS mainly so it was easy to hit. Then Valorant came out so I went to try it and I got about 160-235 fps in the game and they don't allow you to go below your max monitor refresh rate...I've upgraded my pc again and will be in the same boat again in maybe a year or two *shrug*
Be careful with monitor and gpu ports. I wanted a real upgrade from QHD ultra wide 165hz ips to a 240hz UHD oled ultra wide and that can only be achieved with dp 2.1. No gpu has display port 2.1 and unfortunately Nvidia is rumored to have a dp 2.1 on 5000 series gpu(sucks for me as I just got 4070ti at release)
@@Haru_no_ki 🫵😂
No? DSC is a thing, sure it has issues, but it absolutely allows for 4k 240hz.
unless that monitor was the Odyssey Neo G9 (which is Mini LED, not OLED), then thats not true. With DSC you can run 4K 240Hz with either HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.4.
Sounds like finding the right cable saves you $500-$2000
4:05 I like this funny bs quote, because yes fake haha funni,but also he was the tallest president in US history lol.
the crt monitor on my floor waiting for a replacement capacitor: 👁👄👁
LMFAOO real bro same with me, Gateway ev910 1600 x 1200 at 75hz its a beast just dimm af rn
@ aw, sick! I found a Compaq FS600E that was never taken out of its original box. 1024x768 85Hz, was an absolute blast to use until the capacitor decided enough was enough
Just get a monitor with good backlight strobing like dyac or ulmb2
Bro I have been looking for a monitor perfect timing
Hey honestly was wondering if you thought of doing a review on the Pulsar X3 when it comes out. Supposed to come out November 29th and it’s a G703 clone that’s super lightweight. Thought it would be nice to see a review from you. Thank you!
Hey man I was wondering if you could do a video about the best mouse for Rainbow Six Siege like you did with CS and Valorant. I know they take a lot of work but the new major is happening right now and I’ve seen a lot of clear angles for most teams.
Budget monitors are within swinging distance of what the expensive monitors can do. Judging by the somewhat premium monitor I bought (as "Used - Acceptable" on Amazon), it's not night and day, and I don't miss it when I'm sneaking some gaming in on my parent's $100 random Acer 1080p60 monitor they bought years ago, on their Ryzen APU office PC. Okay, 120Hz+ has been nice. Good colors are nice to have (I think?), but whatever. I still enjoy gaming on anything that has a screen, pretty much.
Basic monitors are marvels of engineering already. Sure, fancier monitors are impressive, especially in theory, but the diminishing returns are massive when budget stuff is so good. My 2 cents.
If people want to geek out and splurge on that, more power to them I guess. But it's not essential IMO. I don't play multiplayer, so FPS above about 90-120Hz is probably wasted on me, but having had access to 240Hz I struggle to consciously tell a difference between that and 120, and I have often locked games to 120Hz for stability reasons and have enjoyed it quite a bit that way. (A lot of games are hard to run above 60FPS, let alone above 90 or 120!) Games that lock themselves to 60FPS are still very fun for me. I do believe there are benefits to "better tech", but they are increasingly situational the "better" the specs get.
I'd say anything 120Hz+, with a size and resolution that's practical for the intended use, it's very hard to get an actually bad monitor. (60 is nice, but 120 is worth it in a lot of games and costs hardly much more than 60 anymore.)
Bepsi the goat
Maybe I didn’t catch it, however what is also worth mentioning is that you don’t neet 1440p resolution on monitors below 27 inches.
FullHD - max 24 inches
1440p - from 27 inches
1440p is not 2K. 2K resolution is 2048x1080. 1440p is called WQHD or simply 1440p
@ that is what I ment, mistake form my side ;)
so not true, i have 24 inch 1440p and it looks 10x better then my old 24 inch 1080p, 1440p is significantly better at almost every screen size.
@@yarincool1237 No one said it doesnt look better. Its just that you probably dont use 100% scaling in your desktop meaning you probably use 125 or 150% scaling which is the equivalent to 1080p which defeats the purpose of buying a higher res display.
@haewymetal yeah I use 125% and everything looks so much sharper, I'd rather it look sharper then have more real estate.
Is it true that if you have 240 hz monitor,for example, and play comparative games without hitting 240 hz - it is better to switch to a monitor with lower fps?
For example you play Fortnite with 230-235 fps on avarage and it is better to switch to 180 hz monitor just to make them lock in one number?
Sorry for mistakes - English not my first language,but I hope you understood the point 😊
No not true, if you get 180 fps on average and you're on a 144hz monitor upgrading to a 240hz monitor wouldn't be worth it (40hz increase). However, if you're achieving 230fps it it definitely worth making the upgrade (86hz increase)
Dude, Brotato is goated.
Thanks for the advice Dan tdm
5:16 desk size?
Amazon links do not work for me 😬
Ohh yes, new video 🥰
Already bought a odyessy g6 on sale 😀
Lol same
@ have you set it up yet? i haven’t done mine since im waiting for my new desk
@@austenpowers9940 Yeah I've been using it for a month now and it's so good
say, how it? Wanna buy Odyssey G5 27'' (with VA), curved.
@@sclpl90 i’ve had a great time with it. My eyes are pretty meh but there’s basically no ghosting and the speakers are better than expected. Definitely pick it up if it’s still on sale
the best monitor or pc part, its the one you can actually afford, get anything above 120hz and be happy... i'm currently eyeballing Xiaomi Mini LED G Pro 27i to be my partner for the next 5-6 years
Ordered Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDP, wish me luck
writing a lot of words to help boost you in the algo!
Gigabyte m27qx is the best monitor in my opinion, 1440p so you can watch videos super clearly and 240hz for gaming
It was also only $200, of course there are better monitors out there but none that cost below like $300
I have the same one.
I still wish i had an oled
But this would hold good for a year or two then 480hz+ oled glossy would be great for me.
Or just get oled vr.
i had a qd ips 1440p 165hz monitor, msi optix it was actually great but the backlight died out on me so imma get the msi one on sale on amazon rn for 500
@@gmodiscool14 get oled
holy 10k hours on tf2… that is crazy dudes a real trooper
that number is from release so it's not so bad
cant get 240 frames and reviews finalmouse???? what???
if you can't reach 240 frames on your 240hz monitor you might wanna consider becoming a stretched res gamer for competitive fps. just going 16:10 can already help
Doesn't help if you're cpu bottlenecked since the cpu doesn't care about resolution
i didn't know that
@@cvd1 most of the time you will still be able to squeeze a bit more
@@razpaqhvh7501 sub 1% of fps because the only gains you'll make is due to the lower fov of stretched resolutions
I didn't know you played tf2. Is that the game you went pro in? Who's your main?
DiamondLobby has spent 416 days worth of time on TF2...
I went with ips 1440p 180hz monitor for 200$ which is pretty much acceptable in my opinion and its 24 inch which is not ez to find
I found an 240hz option but its 27 inch which is on the big side for me and my gou is rtx 3060 so i wont get those fps on any game other then valorant
TNs aren't necessarily for pro gamers they're for competitive gamers. There's a difference.
If your setup is garbage then mine is absolute dogwater. I feel u tho
I'd figured that anyone who has over 10K views for pretty much every video had "made it" and was a full on successful TH-camr. To think that's not enough to make loads'a'money is kind of mind boggling to me. Damn.
Wish they made a 1440p 32in oled
Just buy a 27 inch and have it closer to your face :O
I have an Asus PG248QP 540hz it is the fastest LCD monitor right now it has 1.4ms response Time at 540hz at OD normal settings at OD eSports settings it has 0.9 average response Time but it has higher overshoot zowie xl2586x has 2.45 Ms response Time at 540hz which is too slow compared to the Asus model but I think 1440p OLED 480hz monitor is the best monitor in the world because of better colors, 0.3ms response Time, higher resolution and infinite contrast.
Don't tell me what to do you're not my real dad
as if you know who your daddy is
For anyone who has too much money, just get an OLED. 👍🏻
All Kinds of gamers play Skyrim - Respect !!
Be me:
Buys the aqdp
Upgrades pc on the launch of 9800x3d (first self built pc)
Game has dips is unplayable
Returns 7900xtx thinking it might have been issue with it and gets 4080
Stutter still remains decides to use it on old pc it works well and uses old power supply to check if it’s an issue with that and no issues
Replaces ram still no luck then the motherboard board still no luck
Finally decides to replace cpu next replacement comes 12th December
And refunded the gpu
Sold old pc yesterday
Now stuck like a dumb ass with no pc and bored, thinking of returning the entire thing until I get the replacement cpu just to be on the safe side
Now thinking should I just wait for 50 series and get both gpu and monitor till then?
TL;DR did dumb things and stuck without a gaming setup and thinking of should I wait till the launch of 50 series or not
You're not entirely right about getting no benefit from a higher refresh rate if you can't output an equally high fps. Watch 3kliksphilip's video' The Benefits of a High Refresh rate Monitor' for the breakdown.
1440P is a huge competitive advantage IMO and pros need to move to it, it helps you spot and aim so much easier even in games like csgo and valorant, and its even more of an advantage in games like pubg and tarkov, also IPS over TN any day so you can see thee game and enemies clearer, i dont care how fast TN and 1080P is, it looks so bad that its a disadvantage, also in competitive games theres no FPS diffrence as pros and competitive players play on low and these games are CPU bound anyway.
when was the last time u used tn? cause its not bad at all idk what are u talking about
they won't move to 1440p unless we get an actually good cpu and gpu upgrades, for now nvidia, and and intel are just milking money from us lol. for pros it's much more important to play at 540 fps than having a clearer image since they play on 24 inch screens anyway
also they like 24 inches because the screen is just smaller so they can see it all at once, buying a 1440p and if you need scaling down to 1080p is very bad it's gonna extremely blurry compared to base 1080p, 4k would be better but then you definitely won't play 4k on competitive games anytime soon
@@aleks-lj9yq you just play it at native 1440p why would you need to scale down lol, the fps diffrence is very little in competitive games anyway.
its to late i bought mine 2 weeks ago 50% off 165 hz
3:21 POE 👀
me after seeing he has 10197 hours on tf2: 👁👄👁
i got a 180 hz amd sync premium for 130$ CAD
10000 hours on TF2???
based
Whoops I already bought a 1440p OLED 240hz monitor for 399$ before watching the video. I hope I'm not cooked
@@HazardRiot That's a really nice price which model is it?
@aleks-lj9yq AOC AGON PRO AG276QZD
Ive seen the reviews and decided to pull the trigger on it, there was a QD-OLED remaster of the monitor for the same price, but it was fairly new and didn't have many reviews.
Above 120hz is meme territory
it's really not
IPS to OLED is black and white difference.
It doesn't matter if all you play is valorant
@@cvd1yes it matters, OLED pixels take 0.1 ms to refresh vs 1.5 ms for a very good ips, making the image more clear with less ghosting so less blur..
@@aleks-lj9yq MBR exists and if you don't use it you're missing out
you dont want to be saving on a monitor.
4:45.. You have my sub.. 😈
Get at least a 240hz OLED monitor don't ever cheap out monitor and CPU.
start competing for epsilon again and win that HUGE amount tf2 esport money
in my 8 years of being a PC gamer.
higher hz = smoother screen
tn < IPS < OLED = better looking screen.
gsync freesync = smoother gaming, less screen tearing
1080p
motion clarity is a combination of multiple factors not just higher refresh rate
99% Players only need 144hz i recommend OLED.. If youre trying to go pro NO you dont need 240hz plus still get 144hz then upgrade if you actually make it anywhere
MOINTOR
Buying anything below 480hz for competive games is simply self sabotage. You will put yourself at a severe disadvantage against the competition.
Most people can't run games at 480 fps, and a few games cap out at 300 fps anyway
Not really. No professional esports fps game(cs2,r6,apex,fortnite) etc supply 480hz montiors for pro players in LAN tournaments. 480fps is extremely difficult to achieve on a fps title. most pros also just aren't experts on equipment anyways, they just use whatever.
Good luck with doing that after the 9800x3d shortage fam
Your forgetting about Motion Blur Reduction Tech.