Iran and Saudi Arabia join BRICS bloc | DW Business

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.6K

  • @teoengchin
    @teoengchin 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +439

    Not referring to the global south as "the jungle" would probably be a good start to improve relations

    • @PepeCoinMania
      @PepeCoinMania 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      😂😂😂that will be hard for these guys

    • @larissamello374
      @larissamello374 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      They want to get closer to UAE and Saudi Arabia talking about ditching the oil. 🤣🤣 They should start by convincing Norway.

    • @alexxxXXXrus
      @alexxxXXXrus 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      Westerners just cant imagine how it can be.

    • @nusaibahibraheem8183
      @nusaibahibraheem8183 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Exactly 😂😂 Joseph Borelle and his garden 😂

    • @mikomiko993
      @mikomiko993 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      They keep calling them poor country and hv no respect.

  • @leonardocolossi2270
    @leonardocolossi2270 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +336

    The german guy seems quite unaware of what is happening. Brics want to make trade without dollar.

    • @samuellopesbaule5745
      @samuellopesbaule5745 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, BRICS want to ditch the dollar! Because the west uses the dollar as a tool to subjugate those countries they don't like! The dollar and EURO right now are the currencies of oppression and terrorism against countries of the South!

    • @Nobleman707
      @Nobleman707 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Which will definitely happen.

    • @southasianreport
      @southasianreport 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      This guest speaker looks like scapegoated School children who memorise lesson without understanding the lecture. 😂😂

    • @Nobleman707
      @Nobleman707 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@southasianreport I tell you. When you see the reality yet staunchly denying it.

    • @larissamello374
      @larissamello374 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That probably the main reason for countries to join.

  • @steveagola9317
    @steveagola9317 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +424

    Why shoud it always be about confrontation? if they want to join BRICS , let them, they're sovereign states looking for expanding their economic ties with other states not just the US and EU. Its about diversification. Don't frame it to be a confrontation, which it isn't.

    • @mabo9636
      @mabo9636 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      India is a member of Quad and BRICS at the same times

    • @filipe5722
      @filipe5722 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Why don't you go ask that question to BRICS countries like Russia who frame the bloc as the opposition to the West?

    • @duncanbauer7309
      @duncanbauer7309 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haven't you learned anything from the DEI?

    • @MeetParmar-qs9ko
      @MeetParmar-qs9ko 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly....these westerners hypocrites will never understand that there is world outside western countries.

    • @anarabbasov8634
      @anarabbasov8634 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

      ​@@filipe5722this rhetoric is met in western media only

  • @Dani2kGaming_GEIR
    @Dani2kGaming_GEIR 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +578

    as an Iranian,that will be game-changer for my country ,especially under the heavy western sanctions

    • @tareqxodia4597
      @tareqxodia4597 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      If you noticed how he said "iran", you'd understand why he answered like that

    • @Blitzkers99
      @Blitzkers99 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

      Resources and Enriched Uranium+ Military aid from Russia
      Medicine, Quality Tea, Spices,Rich Quality Silk,Saffron,Steel and Support From India
      Affordable Technology equipment,Daily Products,Affordable Electronics,Affordable Gadgets, 5G upgrade faster internet,Affordable Vehicle parts from China
      Gold,Diamond,Quartz,Iron,Gemstones Etc From South Africa
      Its a Big Win Win for Iran

    • @filipe5722
      @filipe5722 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Press X to doubt

    • @larissamello374
      @larissamello374 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      It will be game changer for your relantionship with Saudi Arabia as well. There are a 100 anual meeting, games, tv channel, the countries end up tolerating each other more.

    • @Goe007
      @Goe007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      India and China, Iran 🇮🇷 and Saoudi Arabia in BRICS organisation is like having Russia and Ukraine inside EU or NATO.
      BRICS will implode 😅😅😅

  • @syednajamulsaqib7664
    @syednajamulsaqib7664 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +211

    For years, the US imposed unilateral sanctions on other states by using its leverage over international economic order. Since every action has reaction, states are now trying to shield their economies through de-dollarization and diversification of economic relations. BRICS brings global South on one page for pursuing these goals.

    • @KCKnowsBest
      @KCKnowsBest 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      oh hush. All these countries besides china and Russia still rely on economic or military aid from USA. The dollar isn't going anywhere. At least not in our lifetime. Saudi still insist on only accepting USD for oil.

    • @gtaraya
      @gtaraya 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      i got a feeling the letter agencies will try to throw wrench on this plan and make each other fight.

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean the 2 trillion the US spent in Afghanistan? Did you ever ask yourself, how can someone spend two trillion in a country which has an annula GDP of 30 billion? Even if an Afghan overlord steals that money and buys a Ferrari out of it, that would increase the afghan GDP on paper. @@KCKnowsBest

    • @elmerkilred159
      @elmerkilred159 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you think the U.S. is bad, wait until China takes over!

    • @KCKnowsBest
      @KCKnowsBest 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The head of Brics bank said " theres no parallel universe to the dollar, dollars are where the most liquidity are" when asked why majority of loans by the bank are in USD

  • @Writeous0ne
    @Writeous0ne 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Imagine a group of countries operating on economical interests rather than control and military alliances....

    • @tiktokasylum5186
      @tiktokasylum5186 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      A world run by business men rather psycho extremist

    • @cravingtuna1561
      @cravingtuna1561 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *nvaded Ukraine, promises to invade Taiwan by 2024, is a theocratic regime that props up Hezbollah* damn those economical interests are not economising

    • @lukesmhudson
      @lukesmhudson 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s a nice idea but it’ll never happen

    • @jontaedouglas7244
      @jontaedouglas7244 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tiktokasylum5186and that doesn’t include the Egyptian “president” who is literally bankrupting his country by building a whole new capital for him and his rich friends so his peasants can’t protest in his view ?? Or the Russian one, who’s waging a genocidal war just to stroke his fragile ego and make him believe he’s Peter the great 😂😂😂 if you don’t like America or the west that’s fine, enjoy not having basic human rights and watching the people your regimes CHOOSE to enrich themselves enrich themselves

    • @re-vitiligo
      @re-vitiligo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@lukesmhudson 😂👍🏾

  • @nusaibahibraheem8183
    @nusaibahibraheem8183 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    0:08 "China dominated grouping" 😂😂😂 As opposed to G7, the US dominated grouping 😂

    • @PHALANGE1931
      @PHALANGE1931 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      🤣🤣

    • @wongkoewei9829
      @wongkoewei9829 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Someone forgot India and Russia are also playing significant role in BRICS?

    • @TD1237
      @TD1237 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not to mention the fact that China allows their partners freedom and independence, hence why African countries enjoy trading with them. A group dominted by China allows freedom of thought and view amongst its members. Not that it will necessarily be domnated by them.

    • @Dr.Kraig_Ren
      @Dr.Kraig_Ren 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TD1237And Brics is an economy group. Not a military alliance. They fund projects and give technology in infrastructure projects.
      I remember a Chinese company helped in building a section of India's regional rail because it was funded by brics bank and china also holds a share in it. All this despite hostilities among them.

  • @lepetitroquet9410
    @lepetitroquet9410 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +357

    Putting Saudi Arabia and Iran in the same group is the best way to ensure stability and easily taken decisions. Glad to see Egypt and Ethiopia together complimenting the recipe for constructive meetings.
    How about adding Pakistan next, just to make the Indo-China couple even more lively ;p ?

    • @randomguy7175
      @randomguy7175 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      India would veto Pakistan. It's not just possible.. even chins knows that Pakistan military leadership are just pawns in the hands of US. Imran Khan saga exposed that. I don't think even china is eager , they may say for sake of asking...

    • @phaltheanyabby2044
      @phaltheanyabby2044 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Lol that’s irony isn’t it

    • @yte549
      @yte549 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      As far as India is there, there is no harm for west

    • @guru47pi
      @guru47pi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seems more like a way to make sure nothing happens within BRICS. I don't see how these two ever agree on anything.
      The only thing all these countries have in common is that they want less US dependence.
      If only they add Pakistan, Yemen, and Afghanistan, they'll maximize their anti-US but completely incompatible composition

    • @nvmtt
      @nvmtt 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      nope.iran and arabs can work together, they have history of doing so. but india and pakistan? yeah lmao. no. besides, pakistan is in too deep with usa to be in this.

  • @Voxabonable
    @Voxabonable 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Educated people presenting kindergarten level of world view. That's the sinister part.

    • @mna7308
      @mna7308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's all planned brainwashing

  • @Atheist_GOD9
    @Atheist_GOD9 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    The original five decided to brought new partners in. Brazil brought Argentina ( but out now ) Russia brought Iran, India brought UAE, China brought Ethiopia, SA decided to bring Egypt. All were consensual about Saudi Arabia.

    • @paladro
      @paladro 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      consensual with KSA means their leaders paid maybe billions for the support...

    • @gravewalker34
      @gravewalker34 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      India brought Iran and UAE.

  • @jackgoodnight22
    @jackgoodnight22 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    DW NEWS cried hard

  • @wagrof
    @wagrof 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

    Congratulations to the BRICS countries, this is a good development and offers hope for more peace in this war-torn world. I hope there will be a format in which ordinary citizens from all over the world can participate in some form.

    • @johnsonleebiu8669
      @johnsonleebiu8669 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would BRICS members have their meeting behind close door like sinister WEF?

    • @josullivan5189
      @josullivan5189 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So far it’s led to more war

    • @wagrof
      @wagrof 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, current wars are centered around NATO and not BRICS. BRICS is not an military alliance and didn't lead to any war. NATO did.@@josullivan5189

  • @alexstepanov5394
    @alexstepanov5394 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    EU: Russia is in total isolation
    Putin: gets a king's like welcome in the Middle East
    BRICS: expands from 5 to 10, and more to go
    I think the people of EU's countries are really proud of work done by Borrel, Ursula von der something and other wise and competent european leaders
    Please, don't stop! 😂😂😂

  • @leahcasey2678
    @leahcasey2678 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Six of the top 10 oil producing countries are BRICS members ... only two are G7 members.
    Five of the world's top natural gas reserves are BRICS members ... only one is a G7 member.
    The world's top 3 wheat producers are BRICS countries.
    Compare the Debt/GDP ratio's of the G7 countries to the Debt/GDP ratio's of the BRICS countries.
    As long as China, India, Russia and Brazil are excluded from the G7 - the G7 will lose even more relevance.

    • @lipids7185
      @lipids7185 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      actually West is turning rapidly to renewable almost all the European countries by 2030 will produce more than 80% of the energy needs from renewable only if you include the Atom energy is 90 plus % ,i would like to see where will sell all the garbage oil and gas ,even China is turning rapidly to renewable.

    • @krashme997
      @krashme997 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      The more members you add, the less cohesion there will be. The less cohesion there is, the less relevant a group becomes due to its inability to take any meaningful decision. We're not playing a game here, adding two countries into the same group doesn't suddenly make them allies. They don't suddenly switch under a single flag and start functioning as a single entity.
      The addition of both Saudi Arabia and Iran, two deadly ennemies, is a weird move that speaks more about the intention of BRICS to appear big and strong than to really want to get things done. BRICS so far has achieved little in its decade-long existence beyond some trade agreements that didn't need BRICS anyway, and I see it's probably going down the same path in the future: lots of noise, little to show for it.

    • @WingkKong
      @WingkKong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@krashme997It is simple they all do not want to control by the US dollar anymore

    • @krashme997
      @krashme997 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WingkKong And how is joining BRICS gonna change that? Replacing it with the reminbi and making them reliant on China instead? All trading in their own currency which is going to turn into a mess? It's not like they needed BRICs to agree on that anyway. Nah, BRICS so far appears like one big cake full of nothing. They keep adding stuff on top to make it look fancier until it crumbles under its own weight because it has no solid base.

    • @nicholasxamotainiumgilgamesh
      @nicholasxamotainiumgilgamesh 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sounds legit to just listen to 7 countries i guess ​@@krashme997

  • @amroshawky7246
    @amroshawky7246 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    Every country had its own agenda for joining BRICS. Egypt is looking for ways to diversify its debt due to its dollar shortage. UAE just dropped the US petrodollar, and KSA is well on their way joining them.... and so on.
    BRICS is mostly an agreement between countries to drop the USD and encourage trade with other foreign currencies, which will, in turn, reduce political and economic pressure on them.

    • @RonaldMcDonald-u9v
      @RonaldMcDonald-u9v 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Countries are tired of the USA using the dollar as a way to punish them through sanctions. BRICS is fighting these Globalists.

  • @ravveni
    @ravveni 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    Ethiopia controls the main waterway that feeds into the Nile which Egypt depends on, and has been constructing their own hydroelectric dams and reservoirs which potentially threaten Egypt's food and water security. Ethiopia joining the same economic trade group as Egypt is probably more out of self-preservation than anything else.

    • @reivell3699
      @reivell3699 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      The main reason why BRICS want Ethiopia is because they have one of the biggest untapped gold mine in the world.
      China has all the manufacturing mean, which is why they invited resource-rich countries.

    • @fanamlawuli6761
      @fanamlawuli6761 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      And so they can talk and solve problems, like Saudi and Iran, we un BRICS bring prosperity not conflict

    • @CU65LATER
      @CU65LATER 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is huge problem for both countries. New Orban in pricks.

    • @Writeous0ne
      @Writeous0ne 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@reivell3699 also control of the Red Sea, Ethiopia is a large country with a lot of arable land though which is rare in Africa. there's definitely potential there. BRICS seems to be getting all of the large poorer countries together who have resources and manpower.

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fanamlawuli6761 As if that Saudi-Iran talks are going so well right now. No organization is capable of bringing these 2 sworn enemies to cooperate on large scale economic matters.

  • @deedat81
    @deedat81 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    He says China dominated and yet Germany is a US colony in a US Dominated alliance..the irony

    • @StephXX3
      @StephXX3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      is china not the dominant member of the brics?

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Thers no dominant member in the BRICS. It is based on common interests. @@StephXX3

    • @4ndr0m3d4n
      @4ndr0m3d4n 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kremlin bots are really tetchy. The fact remains that China is the most advanced member by far, economically as well as militarily, while India comes second.

    • @nightwolf2546
      @nightwolf2546 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Germany is a US colony make up something that sounds reasonable

    • @tomsriver2838
      @tomsriver2838 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Why are you triggered by a simple fact ?

  • @felipefrutoramirezsj5342
    @felipefrutoramirezsj5342 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    BRICS want to trade with as many nations as possible. It's actually the U.S. which is decoupling from China and together with E.U. sanctioning Russia and Iran. BRICS also want alternative to U.S. dollar as a trading currency and U.S.-led financial institutions like IMF and WTO. I think more developing countries (global south) want to join BRIC if invited.

    • @АртемАртем-л4э
      @АртемАртем-л4э 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FYI The list of countries who have formally applied for BRICS membership includes about 20 countries already.

  • @darkuser9992
    @darkuser9992 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    A lot of these countries were once great civilizations and represents a huge portion of humanity. They have been sitting in the shadows of the the US and EU for far too long...

    • @stevenyu5384
      @stevenyu5384 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! What an insightful comment!

    • @ashasandhiasingaram3900
      @ashasandhiasingaram3900 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup

    • @martinlutherking6550
      @martinlutherking6550 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not Egypt, the ancient Egyptians were not the same people/culture of Egypt today.

  • @dannyboy8850
    @dannyboy8850 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Glad to see Argentina declined the invitation to join BRICS. Indonesia should be the next on the list to join BRICS.

    • @MatheusSalazart
      @MatheusSalazart 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Indonesia, Mexico, turkey, argelia, vietnam, pakistan and thailand

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      there was no invitation.
      each member applies on their own decision.

    • @reivell3699
      @reivell3699 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't get invited, Argentina applied to join and then bail out by themselves, that's the beauty of BRICS.

    • @Nikita4557
      @Nikita4557 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Indonesia and Turkiye should def join.

    • @anbang4531
      @anbang4531 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​​@@Nikita4557turkey is a nato state so chances are slim.

  • @harriemeeuwis978
    @harriemeeuwis978 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    I would have liked to see the expert give factual evidence for his claim that China is a tough creditor. Tougher than the IMF or World Bank? That would be surprising.

    • @stevenyu5384
      @stevenyu5384 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Love your comment. Thank you for asking for evidence. The guest likely made a statement based on hearsay.

    • @KirbyZhang
      @KirbyZhang 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China makes asset-backed loans and doesn't really forgive debts. other than that they offer good rates a finances a wider range of projects.

    • @harriemeeuwis978
      @harriemeeuwis978 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@KirbyZhang Good rates is very positive for poor countries.

  • @williamwatitwa3534
    @williamwatitwa3534 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    We need a new world body ,anew united nations that works for everyone and not only the west, a security council that works for everyone, respected by everyone for every, we need a word criminal justice system that would jail a us president or a minister or a soldier for war crimes just like it would an African president or politician or war criminal. We need a financial system that is fair and serves the world not the west. Only then will world order reign

  • @liuantony638
    @liuantony638 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Great! Brics is a platform for peace and development.

    • @Nubbe999
      @Nubbe999 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      🙄

    • @expertonion
      @expertonion 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂😂😂 lol Peace with India and china there? They first make peace with themselves.

    • @jakkuwolfinsomnia8058
      @jakkuwolfinsomnia8058 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      How naive

    • @sofunnystars5557
      @sofunnystars5557 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@expertonionyes, it's win win relationship.
      Not like relationship West vs Rest of the world

    • @VladFlatten-tr6tu
      @VladFlatten-tr6tu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      BRICS is a paper tiger and a joke.

  • @larryconstantine1404
    @larryconstantine1404 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    The world is changing fast 🎉

  • @rkt2583
    @rkt2583 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I got goosebumps when this guy says Iran supporting terrorism. since when Resistance groups and freedom fighters are considered terrorists.

    • @EyFmS
      @EyFmS 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Now imagine resisting 74 lashes for not wanting to cover your hair.

    • @Servantofkhuzestan
      @Servantofkhuzestan 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@EyFmSthat's so fun

  • @Say_My_Name--
    @Say_My_Name-- 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    When *INDIA* & *China* , Saudi & IRAN join the Same Group..You Can Understand The Importance of That Group
    *BRICS* is A Brand 💪💪💪💪

    • @jilongxie6561
      @jilongxie6561 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, BRICS is a organization to solve conflicts between nations.

  • @cheese-power
    @cheese-power 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Such a biased host that tries to make any conversation acrimonious 😕

  • @dannynicholson6014
    @dannynicholson6014 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a Westerner myself, i support BRICS expanding and going for it themselves. The west has brought this on ourselves, especially in the last four years with leaders like Biden, Sunak and Macron!

  • @floppydisk9541
    @floppydisk9541 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Saudi and Iran partnering together? Wow. Global politics really has a huge shift.

    • @puppetmaster579
      @puppetmaster579 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They have far more to gain being partners than being enemies. Earlier in the year, China won a massive PR coup when it brokered rapproachement between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and I believe China dangled the prospect of membership in BRICS as a reward for ending their feud, and this is stabilising for the Middle East. China basically put out the fires that the US had been lighting all over the region.

    • @mirbalochkhan6380
      @mirbalochkhan6380 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why not?

    • @resnica3557
      @resnica3557 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If they are able to have already restablished formal diplomatic relations and activate their respective embassys with the help of China, what else is not possible for them to partner in mutually beneficials ways?
      Is it any surprise to you that they choose to be cooperative with each other, instead of being confrontational as the US-led Collective West wished for and attempted to instigate them to become but failed big time?

  • @clarkroberts5603
    @clarkroberts5603 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    It’s a club of nations that are making a stand against the US world economic order.There are a few like Brazil that don’t want to stand with either side exclusively so they are playing the field. The sustainability stuff is only relevant in that all of these nations really only care about their own industrialization. And have or need resources to do it.

    • @MeetParmar-qs9ko
      @MeetParmar-qs9ko 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Only care about industrialization?? Whole EU is colony of US. When US attacks Afghanistan, Iraq, libya, etc why EU doesn't uttered a word if they are really care of human rights??? Bcoz of colony

    • @roym4457
      @roym4457 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Brazil is slightly lean-china. But they do stand with the US on some issues.

    • @MarthyWilliamsWilliams
      @MarthyWilliamsWilliams 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@roym4457we want survive unfortunately US are suffocating us we had been forever in poverty and our country is a rich country we have a great soil where everything blossom why should we be under economically oppression?

    • @caomilo1031
      @caomilo1031 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The meaning and substance of BRICS is evolving. No one really knows what BRICS would turn to in the next decade.

    • @darkuser9992
      @darkuser9992 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm surprised the most about Nigeria. It would fit the BRICS model very well.

  • @hyuxion
    @hyuxion 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I am laughing, when he said western rule based order. You know, it is a constant changing and double standard rule, one that benefits USA the most.

    • @B1sher
      @B1sher 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      There are neither rules nor order in the pax-americano hegemony.

    • @patrickgz
      @patrickgz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      shifting goal post syndrome

  • @gaborrajnai6213
    @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    I spit my coffee to the monitor, when I heared you want Saudi Arabia and UAE two of the biggest fossil producers to get back to your side promoting climate policies.

    • @lm_b5080
      @lm_b5080 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      i mean the world's largest oil producer is actually the USA and is the only country who previously pulled out of the Paris Agreement...

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, someone would say that tells exactly what do they think about the climate BS. @@lm_b5080

    • @roym4457
      @roym4457 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Their oil will run out one day. It's better to be prepared which they are absolutely doing now.

    • @jackiechan7909
      @jackiechan7909 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The West is idiotic as we could ever live without oil. Basically everything is based or has in it oil. That stuff is to precious to burn it in engines, so even a green nation will need oil.

    • @ramon1930
      @ramon1930 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@roym4457 It is going run centuries yet

  • @j2b348
    @j2b348 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Well-done to BRICS. Good news

  • @TM-tw1py
    @TM-tw1py 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The US dollar will always have an underlying intrinsic value - as toilet paper.

    • @crashlag420
      @crashlag420 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      As soon as the gold standard was dropped back the the 60s and 70s the dollar was doomed.
      Nowadays the American government is just printing more and more money to try and curb the growing debt crisis, and we as citizens have little to no control over this snowball effect that is occurring because of the way our country is divided. People grow up spending their entire lives only seeing one part of the story and will do anything to keep the machine going. Its honestly sad to see.

    • @Mia-sp5wh
      @Mia-sp5wh 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Toilet paper then why is it still the most used

    • @picksleet9268
      @picksleet9268 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mia-sp5whits not gonna continue to be used and regions only use it until it wears off you can’t switch to another thing instantly

    • @Mia-sp5wh
      @Mia-sp5wh 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@picksleet9268 yeah but it just doesn’t happen easily

  • @mjmf1430
    @mjmf1430 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The western model, particularly the G7 and NATO, to "divide and rule" is not BRICS’ model of operation. China, India and Russia, which are known to have major issues with each other, would have imploded the BRICS according to many western critics but that didn’t happen. Instead the opposite happened and is continuing to evolve due to BRICS belief in strengthening relationships and cooperation amongst the rest of the world outside the G7 and NATO.

    • @WingkKong
      @WingkKong 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Because they all have the same goal
      They do not want to control by the US dollar any more

    • @alexk3604
      @alexk3604 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tbh only China and India have major issues between each other

  • @_Wai_Wai_
    @_Wai_Wai_ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Saudi Arabia, the Lynchpin country of OPEC, and formerly one of the USA's best weapons customer joining BRICS. This is a big deal. SA used to an enemy to Iran until the recent peace deal mediated by China last year. With Iran and SA growing closer, the USA may lose influence in the MIddle East.

  • @EdinDervie
    @EdinDervie 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Congratulations to all the new members of the brics community I hope that you will never use sanctions to betray one another stay away from sanctuary and one another no matter what the situation in your countries may be.

  • @worldview2888
    @worldview2888 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    WELCOME IRAN AND SAUDI ARABIA!

    • @davidd.c.9344
      @davidd.c.9344 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah, welcome to the trailer park!😅😅

    • @puppetmaster579
      @puppetmaster579 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@davidd.c.9344 Trailer parks are in the US for white trash. They are particularly common in the US south and in the Appalachians.

  • @jasonscorsese
    @jasonscorsese 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the biggest joke i heard all day is for a guy from the EU , to say China is a very strict creditor and it’s the worlds most lenient. talk to the greeks about ECB

  • @jaroslawpiotrowski210
    @jaroslawpiotrowski210 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    BRICS countries are bigger and bigger, close co-operation with Chine are importent for them, Chine needs Oil, Gaz & food, On the other habd - Chine will sell goods (cars, machines, compuers & electronic stuff). Thay can avoid currency (USD, EURO) - it is very importatnt.
    PS. Europe is stable market, in not growing (populations & customers) - so - No future for big buissnes :)

  • @Jimmy1972
    @Jimmy1972 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    BRICS has become the most influential economic association in the world, leaving behind G7 the countries of which are experiencing economic recession and stagnation.

    • @Man_of_Various_Cultures
      @Man_of_Various_Cultures 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Bro BRICS is an afterthought. Most people don't even know what BRICS is and what it seeks to accomplish.

    • @alexk3604
      @alexk3604 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Man_of_Various_Cultures Same with G7

  • @jbparkthree
    @jbparkthree 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I am happy to hear that BRICS got bigger.

  • @1rjona
    @1rjona 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    We will see which of the new BRICS members will have strongest economic growth in the next few years. And we compare that to Argentina and its new economist president

    • @brenoobr
      @brenoobr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      lol

    • @puppetmaster579
      @puppetmaster579 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Highest economic growth will likely be India, at around 7-8%. Egypt and China are in the 5-6% range. Ethiopia was the fastest growing economy in the 2010s. They slowed down because of internal problems, but they can rebound again.

    • @1rjona
      @1rjona 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@puppetmaster579 compare that Argentina who still believe in the Western economic order

  • @MusehanaH
    @MusehanaH 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    "China is very tough as a credit giver"...Did he mean the IMF maybe? Lol

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      it DW have to include some bashing or it wont get the 350M usa anti china fund

    • @OnTheRoadWithEric
      @OnTheRoadWithEric 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They r paid to bad mouth another country aka China.

    • @VVayVVard
      @VVayVVard 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, China lends easily (using the donations it gets from the EU and the US, mainly, thanks to its developing status) and then charges high interest.

    • @damiencastillo6216
      @damiencastillo6216 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. He meant the country that colonises poor countries like Sri Lanka, Kenya and Macedonia. China.
      The Era of the wumao is done. You have no role anymore. The image of China as a bad actor, bully and a generally nasty neighbor is firmly entrenched. There is no rescuing that image with these comments. Your 50 cents are better spent elsewhere.

    • @mickeydi
      @mickeydi 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@VVayVVardchina getting donation from EU & US? Do you live in this planet or elsewhere 😂 70% of US debt is owned by China..go vist china they are on another level they are way ahead of EU or US it might be painful but it's the fact.

  • @keekeehing5457
    @keekeehing5457 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Welcome Brics and hope it brings peace and prosperity.

  • @udhelhc
    @udhelhc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Congratulations BRICS

  • @crystal2484
    @crystal2484 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    keep your friends close and your enemies closer

    • @songwang9534
      @songwang9534 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why do you define enemies? Like Saudi and Singapore are not democracy. Are they enemies?

    • @crystal2484
      @crystal2484 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@songwang9534 India and China aren't friend. India and Iran aren't friend and Iran and Saudi aren't friend. Well, it's a club to see what China can give them but China is out of $$, only trades. It's gullible to define friends and foes by democratic and communists....very naive.

    • @songwang9534
      @songwang9534 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @climatescientist why do you call them competitors? That would be confused with real enemies, no?

    • @KwokLeung-q6u
      @KwokLeung-q6u 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nonsense

    • @songwang9534
      @songwang9534 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @climatescientist as Chinese, I view Taiwan as family number. Not ememies. There are fight in the family but it is still family in the end. Like East German and west German. Make it even further, I do not mind one day to be ruled by Taiwanese because we are family. But I mind to be ruled by Japan or US

  • @berschte
    @berschte 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why he did not say one word concerning India? By the way India is the biggest democracy in the world and part of BRICS.

  • @avex3903
    @avex3903 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    westerners are not happy in the comments that means brics are dowing the right thing

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I dont get it why. I wish anyone to get out of powerty. If the globals south doing better thats good for everyone.

    • @sH-ed5yf
      @sH-ed5yf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Basicly all brics states except Brasilia are dictatorships. Funny that free peaople cheer on dictstors

    • @wowmasterhunter
      @wowmasterhunter 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      beeing for human rights and against dictators is a bad thing?

    • @avex3903
      @avex3903 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@wowmasterhunter human rights by invading them while killing milions of their civilians (collateral damage) ?

    • @MeetParmar-qs9ko
      @MeetParmar-qs9ko 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wowmasterhunter please stop this hypocrite lectures of human rights and democracy. Why all west is silent in gaza ? This is weapon used by west.

  • @Decoy0527
    @Decoy0527 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    It's a pleasant surprise nowadays to hear a middle of the road guest answering good questions. The quest seemed a bit taken aback when the question of what can the G-7 countries offer to global south countries to keep them in the fold. It seems obvious to me that the countries not in the G-7 and not in BRICS will benefit from the "competition" a multi polar world brings. I'm more optimistic for Latin America and South America with the alternative now available to them.

  • @maksimpanteleev5104
    @maksimpanteleev5104 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The G7 lost Russia because of Ukraine. As a result, I got a competing alliance, which will continue to collapse. And the EU plans to expand with impoverished countries like Ukraine, to hang stones around its neck. There is no financial benefit in this, but only a symbolic political response. And yet, the transition of Western countries to "green energy" is now a big question. After Germany's loss of Russian gas and the losses incurred, as well as spending on Ukraine, it turned out that there was no budget for green energy. And then it will only get worse. The United States has its own oil and gas. Europe has a minimum

  • @AbdullahAlmefdaa
    @AbdullahAlmefdaa 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Viva Arabia

  • @joem0088
    @joem0088 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    G7 are fiat currency, financialised economies. BRICS are real commodities, and real goods production economies. Which side do you think is better off in the long run ?

    • @filipe5722
      @filipe5722 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The West

    • @joem0088
      @joem0088 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@filipe5722 The West can eat money. Never tried. Is it good ?

    • @righteousmammon9011
      @righteousmammon9011 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well we have the majority of the worlds farmland so I think we'll be alright.@@joem0088

    • @filipe5722
      @filipe5722 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joem0088 Yeah, you should try to earn some.

    • @CrucialConflict.
      @CrucialConflict. 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joem0088BRICS = Axis of Evil

  • @manuchehrsobirov2329
    @manuchehrsobirov2329 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    You two forced yourselves to make a sweet face and look so calm as though nothing special has happened but it is an historic moment, another step for emancipation from colonialism

    • @elmerkilred159
      @elmerkilred159 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Enjoy Chinese Authoritarianism.

  • @mariadelourdessilvamarques7806
    @mariadelourdessilvamarques7806 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Viva os BRICS ❤

  • @annehersey9895
    @annehersey9895 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But the Global South doesn’t seem to want to have anything to do with past Colonial governments. They have not forgotten how they were treated by Europe. And the US didn’t ever colonize Africa BUT post WWII we did meddle in many of the governments there during the Cold War. What’s off is that the USSR also meddled but Africa doesn’t have the same animosity against them as the US.

  • @_.F0X._
    @_.F0X._ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Pulling out at the last second is a dangerous gamble !!

  • @bonkai764
    @bonkai764 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The west:"each country has a right to join whatever organisation it wants. It's Ukraines choice to join eu/nato".
    Also the west:"how dare they join BRICS?!! It's escalating the tensions!!!"

    • @pirateluffy01
      @pirateluffy01 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So True 😂

    • @PanAndriejka
      @PanAndriejka 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The small difference is the west didnt attack anyone for trying to join BRICS. Thats only the difference of 0.5 million dead people 😅

  • @luci75d76
    @luci75d76 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Argentina make the most big mistake they can ever do ......this put them back 15-20 years from now on. Brazil will slow the deals and trade with Argentina while they will divert almost all trade with the others and BRICS. Meanwhile china stop the currency swap

  • @Shaddarhim
    @Shaddarhim 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    All the friendly countries you absolutely want as your neighbor united except North Korea.

    • @badomen9057
      @badomen9057 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      To be fair we like to talk about how much we respect the democracy, freedom and international law but look at the mess we have made in Middle East. It’s fun to point the fingers at other countries but Europe itself is responsible for many of these conflicts.

    • @DynoGreen313
      @DynoGreen313 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      is the u.s. a peaceful country? is the u.k. a peaceful country?
      ask iraq

    • @MyFaceTime
      @MyFaceTime 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      미국이 얼마나 많은 북조선사람을 죽였는지 아십니까?

    • @AORD72
      @AORD72 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @Dinogreeen what rubbish, Iraq was run by a dictator that gassed women and children in a Kurdish village, he also invaded Kuwait a independent country. The people of Iraq are better off without a ruthless dictator.

    • @jeremytine
      @jeremytine 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@MyFaceTimeNorth Korea was the aggressor by attacking south korea

  • @PKP1
    @PKP1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Terms such as western values with geopolitical interest should be changed to western priorities.

  • @miloradvujicic1282
    @miloradvujicic1282 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Grow BRICS securely and nicely.

  • @MohNaz-ly6yx
    @MohNaz-ly6yx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Swift financial system has an alternative now, whenever u.s shuts it down, the alternative to swift becomes activated

  • @Ca7iburn
    @Ca7iburn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Rob's calm demeanor is such a breath of fresh air compared to the dramatic rush other reporters of other news channels have.

  • @jineeshpr
    @jineeshpr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Very good unbiased questions and responses.
    Usually we don’t see this in western media

    • @Sloyment
      @Sloyment 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The reporter Rob Watts is a famous youtuber.

    • @jeffpotter2934
      @jeffpotter2934 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Unbiased? The guest speaker used a bunch of buzz words

    • @samuellmani
      @samuellmani 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watch from 9:00, and tell me whose point of view is the media representing ?

  • @yp77738yp77739
    @yp77738yp77739 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The decline of the west, we’ve done it to ourselves.
    These “values” that he keeps referring to, I suppose those are the values that include supporting the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. They sure are special, one might say they are the antithesis of values.

    • @hopeintruth5119
      @hopeintruth5119 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yet the countries from the BRIC nations wouldn't really care if countries are doing set genocide as long as it doesn't mess with their money. China doesn't care and in retrospect many BRIC nations wouldn't because what does it have to do with them or their money. A lot of people have western values in how the world should run with the care for human life and then there are those that are more selfish or reserved. Where human life that isn't part of their group is something that's expendable and can care less for

    • @yp77738yp77739
      @yp77738yp77739 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@hopeintruth5119 But the difference is that they don’t actively support and enable it, with weapons and funding. That’s a huge difference.

    • @aa-hb3tg
      @aa-hb3tg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hopeintruth5119was this western care for human life shown in Vietnam , Serbia , Arab world ?

    • @hopeintruth5119
      @hopeintruth5119 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yp77738yp77739 well funding a country economy is supporting it. It's like country need money and recognition to fund their oppressive regimes. Yes if your economically still engaging with a country. Yes you are condoning it, yes you are partly funding it indirectly, and yes your are ignoring human tragedy for products. There is no different than a civilian buying from a company that use slave labour and knowing it and a country trading resources with a country who uses their money to fund their oppressive laws and harmful practices like slavery. The west may not be prefect but unlike the east they tend to play some forms of active approach even reducing trade and funds with countries engaging in such tactics. The west try balancing human rights and integrity with money. The East trade human rights for money

    • @hopeintruth5119
      @hopeintruth5119 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aa-hb3tg U.S stop due to liberal hippies that force many western government to stop war for profit and ideological drive as human life and rights should be respected. Arab world barely respected each other and was no different than the west in no measure. The heavy difference is the Arab world didn't have the innovation and power to do what the Europeans did. Arab slave trade existed, enforcing Arab culture throughout North Africa through empires and trade and manipulation of foreign politics, Serbia was truly a complicated tragedy amd again many western liberal progressive didn't agree besides war mongering faction of U.S politics

  • @adr2567
    @adr2567 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Stopped watching after you said ‘China dominated’. More western biased reporting 😂

  • @kostask8851
    @kostask8851 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    What these countries are looking for in reality is to trade with other countries without threats or one sided conditions or blackmail, or fear of sanctions etc, This is a real free trade alliance with the whole meaning of the word, and they will succeed. I wish them all the best.

    • @blatzstats
      @blatzstats 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      On the other hand half of the countries in the Brics human rights are questionable

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Waterboarding is part of the western human rights nowadays? @@blatzstats

    • @oneshothunter9877
      @oneshothunter9877 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@gaborrajnai6213
      Normal treatment of citizens in most BRICS members.
      In worst cases the citizens just disappear or gets unalived without trial.

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Source: trust me bro. @@oneshothunter9877

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@blatzstats western human right mean live in tent city?

  • @namanyagard9146
    @namanyagard9146 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I just want them to issue another currency.its only dollar dominating the world

    • @patrickgz
      @patrickgz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      likely will see different currencies used. one for internal trade and few others for cross border trade, no need to track back to single currency. liberal use of currencies, substantiated by commodities

  • @GemstoneActual
    @GemstoneActual 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Rob does, indeed, have words.
    On TV, even.
    Right on.

  • @chamarachan
    @chamarachan 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Good news and hope near future we will get BRICS currency.

    • @VVayVVard
      @VVayVVard 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The yuan, then. China isn't going to give outside banks control over its currency.

    • @neko1533
      @neko1533 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VVayVVard Nobody within the BRICS want that either. They want a currency similar to the Dollar, but it shouldn‘t be owned by some olygarchs (Dollar is a private currency, not US owned) who can print money and weaponize it to fund wars and to bully other countries. It should be owned by the BRICS bank and all member states should have a say in its development and management.

    • @MeetParmar-qs9ko
      @MeetParmar-qs9ko 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@VVayVVardRussia has already named currency & image as "R5" and as India is there, Yuan not going.

  • @jackbleiham8475
    @jackbleiham8475 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This DW interviewer is so happy that BRICS is expanding his smile is from ear to ear .

  • @nze256
    @nze256 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    The funny thing is the wealthiest BRICS nations all are G7' biggest trading partner, I think it's simply luring these small nations into China's influence, yet China remains USA's no 1 trading partner .

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      China doesnt ask things in order to have a trade cooperation with them. Thats the whole point.

    • @bryceasay7749
      @bryceasay7749 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Biggest trading partner is Canada not China

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bryceasay7749 which country usa?

    • @Dan-Martin
      @Dan-Martin 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      China doesn’t tell countries how to live, what sort of government they should have, and what sort of economic system they should have. In other words, they are not ideologues.

    • @MusehanaH
      @MusehanaH 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...what you meant to say is that, they are luring them away from the IMF and all the US controlled clutches...which is an excellent thing

  • @calvinblue894
    @calvinblue894 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Next 5 countries to join.. Vietnam, Indonesia, North Korea, Mexico, Thailand

    • @HappyGuy-cn9po
      @HappyGuy-cn9po 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never NK. We’re talking about Global South nations.

    • @tamasfeher2772
      @tamasfeher2772 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mexico? Lol...

    • @ariapinandita9240
      @ariapinandita9240 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indonesia is prohibited from joining BRICS by India. Therefore, Indonesia prefers to develop ASEAN further, especially the Rohingya-Bengali problem which was a failure of the British Raj government in the past...

  • @evehawasinare228
    @evehawasinare228 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I expect BRICS to expand but gradually.

    • @jlpowell51
      @jlpowell51 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The real question is when will it actually do something other than talk.

    • @kamsunleong6648
      @kamsunleong6648 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@jlpowell51Probably a lot more than G7. Which is why many wanted to join.

    • @patrickgz
      @patrickgz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if not mistaken, non member countries can already deposit wealth into ndb, there are 'rumors' that loans can be arranged for non members through member country guarantee. you are right, expansion will come gradually, no hurry

  • @siningwow
    @siningwow 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Well done. Hopefully, they will bring in a better World.

  • @ernstthalmann4306
    @ernstthalmann4306 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'm American and good on emerging economies banding together to fight the supremacy of G7 economies and the US dollar. Peace to Palestine 🇵🇸 ✨️ 🙏

  • @tarunmuvvala-q3e
    @tarunmuvvala-q3e 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What has eu done for the world? Apart from slavery

  • @darkuser9992
    @darkuser9992 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Other countries probably could have fit the BRICS model as well. Turkey probably couldn't join because of its position in NATO. Pakistan couldn't join because of India. Nigeria and one of the Southeast Asian economies should have joined too.

  • @JhomarpaulCinco
    @JhomarpaulCinco 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brics is the future ❤❤❤

  • @gtaraya
    @gtaraya 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    BRICS already have the land bridge silk road and the shortcut to the western shores, the red sea!

    • @MusehanaH
      @MusehanaH 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The Arctic is loading....

    • @joeylopez7978
      @joeylopez7978 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They also have the Northern Sea route 🇷🇺

    • @gtaraya
      @gtaraya 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the world will split to two. between the talented and innovative west and resource and manpower rich east.@@joeylopez7978

    • @patrickgz
      @patrickgz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      all covered except for atlantic, for obvious reason

  • @MrMagombo
    @MrMagombo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Long live Brics.
    Together we can.

  • @ANIMALS_AND_MORE_moments
    @ANIMALS_AND_MORE_moments 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    All new BRICS members have been invited to join. Other countries have expressed their interest to joint BRICS but were not invited. Therefore, the strategy is money nations and getting a bigger feet into other continents.

    • @pyrophobia133
      @pyrophobia133 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      they'll get in eventually

    • @japjungho4645
      @japjungho4645 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      they first express interest, then get invited.

  • @BrandyHeng007
    @BrandyHeng007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2024 BRICS motto :
    “Strengthening Multilateralism for Equitable Global Development and Security”
    ❤❤❤

    • @arne8802
      @arne8802 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, we believe everything. right.

    • @BrandyHeng007
      @BrandyHeng007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arne8802
      153 countries participating in BRI-BRICS's projects can't be wrong.

  • @caomilo1031
    @caomilo1031 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Countries are just tired of the west sanctioning this and that at discretion.

  • @Os_man8903
    @Os_man8903 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Do you prefer to live in a country ruled by an autocrat who seeks your interests and doesn’t kill innocent people around the world, or do you prefer to live in a democratic country that wages war around the globe killing innocent people and leaving them in abject poverty?

    • @NeverRubARhubarb
      @NeverRubARhubarb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Name the countries and I'll give you an answer.

    • @elmerkilred159
      @elmerkilred159 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Chinese Authoritarianism instead of democracy!
      What could possibly go wrong?

    • @roym4457
      @roym4457 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you are wrong. The only reason China do not interfere is because they know if they do, nobody would want to deal with them anymore. If one day China do become a superpower, what do you think it's gonna happen. They are gonna just stay back and do nothing if someone hurts their interests? Have you seen what they do to their own people during the pandemic? They were locking up their own people literally in their own home. Not allowing people to go outside of the building to even get some fresh air, which ends in a disastrous backfire. At least 10 people died in a fire because all of their building doors were locked. Is this the life you want to live? Just imagine your country get sanctioned because you don't follow their covid protocol.

    • @proselytizingorthodoxpente8304
      @proselytizingorthodoxpente8304 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Putin's an autocrat, and he's been killing people around the world for decades lol

    • @proselytizingorthodoxpente8304
      @proselytizingorthodoxpente8304 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh, and Iran

  • @TravelingAlim
    @TravelingAlim 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    BRICS+ is great, previously Saudi Arabia and Iran were at war, now they are at peace and have left the USA alliance, surprisingly enough now they have joined the China _ Russia alliance. and what's more, Egypt _ the United Arab Emirates & Ethiopia have also joined BRICS+, BRICS+'s economic strength can compete with the G7 & its military strength can also compete with NATO... 👍👍

    • @jorenbaplu5100
      @jorenbaplu5100 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not a military alliance though? I doubt it will ever be, i mean China and India for example have constant border skirmishes

  • @samyadeepsengupta460
    @samyadeepsengupta460 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Days of hardwork finally bearing fruits

    • @davidd.c.9344
      @davidd.c.9344 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You means years

    • @j.krii.
      @j.krii. 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is far till fruits, first must find some seeds. Bricks have done precisely 0 so far.

  • @daltonwilliams532
    @daltonwilliams532 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the bias in your comments has a defining strain on my ears and for your information the west is no longer the center of world economy, got it.

  • @bae-xv6or
    @bae-xv6or 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I don't think that far, BRICS at least shows that there are countries that dare to show differences towards America and this gives hope for the future .. 😅😅

  • @fanamlawuli6761
    @fanamlawuli6761 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Not expecting anything but saltyness from a western publication, we have n BRICS have everything to grow faster than any western country

  • @andreawallenberger2668
    @andreawallenberger2668 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Inevitable.

  • @god6384
    @god6384 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    how can the UAE even be considered on the same level as Russia, China and Brazil is beyond me. The whole point of "Brics" is already pointless

    • @danielkudo4800
      @danielkudo4800 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Their influence on transit, trade and stability in the middle east are very crucial

    • @MeetParmar-qs9ko
      @MeetParmar-qs9ko 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bcoz you are western. So seems pointless 😂

    • @РоманКоробейников-я5ю
      @РоманКоробейников-я5ю 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Вы на западе привыкли создавать блоки сильных против слабых. Ну и главное это союз экономики, а не политики.

    • @Piyush123.
      @Piyush123. หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where are you from, bro?

  • @М.Столић
    @М.Столић 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Argentina refused to be a member of the BRICS, and therefore I am very pleased to see the happy faces of the presenters.

    • @tatianavorobiova8015
      @tatianavorobiova8015 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Well done, Argentina. See nothing from Russia, only military stuff and taking minerals.

    • @gaurav5161
      @gaurav5161 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you elaborate a little?

    • @NordStar7
      @NordStar7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      these happy faces, as if they had just won the lottery😂

    • @anaskhoiri3653
      @anaskhoiri3653 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Argentina to White and Cristian for joining Brics them just be West lapdog

  • @parkpatt
    @parkpatt 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    wow, how long has Rob Watts worked for DW? What a great match!

  • @maksimpanteleev5104
    @maksimpanteleev5104 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    t's so funny to watch how the expert and the presenter try to cheer up, everything is reduced to energy. By the way, the new alliance has huge human, purchasing, trading, and finally military resources. The alliance of the United States and the impoverished EU is a weak alternative. Brazil chose BRICS over Mercator for a reason.

  • @yossarincatch6051
    @yossarincatch6051 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why does the host smile like a creepy vampire

  • @robertoalex4245
    @robertoalex4245 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The funny thing about BRICS is that most of these countries see other state members as direct threats like India and China, Iran and SA. This is not an alliance that will start another trading currency, or some major ytrading alliance, since most of these member states are in direct conflicts which could very easily escalate. This is just an alliance of states that have been left out of the "major trading club", and they feel as though if they stick together they might get better deals or exert some kind of meager influence ... nothing more, nothing less

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed.
      But some people always look at others as threats, even when the other side is so tiny and insignificant.

    • @gaborrajnai6213
      @gaborrajnai6213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Well I guess the French and the Germans started the EU on very similar grounds...

    • @mountainleopard5370
      @mountainleopard5370 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Like turkey ad France?

    • @mna7308
      @mna7308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It's all about alternative to swift financial system, even many countries see u.s in wrong way but still does business

    • @reivell3699
      @reivell3699 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It doesnt matter if they're enemies, they just want to see dollar dies.

  • @henryzhao4622
    @henryzhao4622 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The alliance of economically rich but politically poor countries

    • @janwoldens1696
      @janwoldens1696 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Lacking democracy?😂

    • @henryzhao4622
      @henryzhao4622 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@janwoldens1696lacking wisdom in politics 😂 even beyond democracy,

    • @NordStar7
      @NordStar7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@janwoldens1696100% 😂

    • @SmilingNinja
      @SmilingNinja 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't even have a creative name for their own organization. 😂

    • @SmilingNinja
      @SmilingNinja 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@janwoldens1696 Or human rights?

  • @S.E.O.S
    @S.E.O.S 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Putin is one great leader 👏