Announcement: In the next days (I don't know exactly when, I hope before Christmas)... I'll start uploading a new edition of a huge collection of Czerny's etudes: new recordings with in some cases (e.g. op.139) more accurate tempos, and perhaps a slightly better sound (unfortunately still "home-made" recordings). This new edition will start with opus 139, and then, when available, other sets!
@@brianbernstein3826 maybe you are just mad because you are bad. Just because it's good doesn't mean it's fake . I know a bunch of people who can play this perfectly.
What you think is half the speed is actually the right speed. This version is done by entering notes into a piano roll in some program like Cubase and then writing in the expression aka modulation. In the 19th century, it would have been played such that the note value in the metronome equation would have represented two ticks of the metronome. That is not available in Digital Audio Workstations other than by adjusting to half the speed shown. Whoever did this did not take that into account, with the resultant loss of clarity.
@@johnb6723 wrong, that metronome nonsense has long since been debunked. Czerny was incredibly gifted on a level that’s extremely rare with pianos with faster action
That brings back memories...played nr. 24 for my music school graduation - in tempo. Now, 40 years later, tempo has dropped a bit. All the notes are still there though.
Fun fact: I lent this book from a public library somewhere back in the 90's. Somehow, I never returned it and got letters from them for 15 years or so afterwards. I haven't back there since I'm afraid what they will say. But I still have it, and plan to return it someday =)
this sounds like those old Fortepianos. I like it! BTW for all those complaining about the speed, just want to tell you that this is supposed to be fast. maybe you don't achieve this speed but the purpose of this book is to play as fast, relaxed and clear as you can.
@@masonfreeman4991 Solution - use the double beat metronome practice as it was how things were done in the time of Mozart, Beethoven, Czerny and Liszt and even beyond.
People tend not to believe one can play with such rapidity.. Upon hearing Claudio Colombo's interpretations of The School of Velocity, it sounds programmed for sure. What needs to be noticed is that the bmp sits at around 104-108. This means the pianists fingers will be performing at twice that speed, at 208-216bpm. They are designed to enhance the ability of the virtuosic performer! Just like Hanon's exercises for the virtuoso.
This velocity school was originally written for two pianos only until 30, the second part is in imslp and there is another school of speed which is Op.834 and is called new School of velocity
As delusional as I may sound, I don't care. According to the absolute limitations of the human coordination of the brain and hands being pushed to the possible max, I was questioning for the first 4 minutes whether or not this is actually acoustically played by someone on an authentic period instrument, or if this was simply done with MIDI...Well, let me tell you something...after hearing number 7...I am wholeheartedly convinced(unless someone respectfully proves me wrong), this is actually no computer. That was a true human touch that I realized was doing this...what an utterly unbelievable achievement here. I was feeling true and sincere human convicted emotion here which made my hairs stand on end...Give the bloody pianist credit!! And I will keep on listening to be genuinely inspired. Moreover, that No.7 is actually a truly sublime, heartwrenchingly beautiful little masterpiece...what a piercing and yearning, yet simple melody that master Czerny wrote. Wow, I am going to do this.
@@Santosificationable Does not sound like Libetta to me. Neuburger does it also, But no idea who is this here. But there are millions of pianists world wide who can play this.
Number 21 seems to be an hybrid of mazeppa from Liszt because the appoggiatura and op 740 no 50 from Czerny because of the beginning medoly. 21:15- here It is
Bravo! great job by recording this, really!. What I don't understand is why the recording sounds if it was made with an early 2000's cellphone. You shoud record this professionally, I'd buy it right away!
note: the n.1 (presto) is played slower then 108. its impossible to play as 108. this is meant to the begginer musician. czerny was a whole-beat metronome guy.
I do - Recently played his Polonaise-fantaisie, Ballades, Scherzos, and considering the La ci darem la mano variations next spring... But learning Chopin's posthumous C-sharp Minor Nocturne is part of what originally got me out of obligations to my Czerny 299 book in early lessons. Discovering Chopin opened my eyes to the world of music beyond the pedagogical track students tend to stay-on under the guidance of most teachers. Hands down, I probably wouldn't be learning Rachmaninoff's Piano Sonata No. 2 today if I hadn't made such a jump earlier in childhood.
It is strange, but for me there has been nothing that has helped me to improve so quickly as playing czerny. I think dedicated practice of things like school of velocity make playing chopin relatively easy, 'gradus ad parnassum' and all that.
I empathize with your school of thought as well. On my hand is the mentality of confronting and solving technical problems in the music on-the-fly with the mentality of milking the technical and musical "lessons" from a passage of concert music, whereas the Czerny route allows the student to encounter many similar situations early-on in the comfort of an exercise book, before testing the waters and building up gradually to more advanced but nevertheless conventional staples of repertoire. One of these students likely tends to develop a rock solid technique early-on, while the other develops an early passion for unconventional repertoire, in-which they develop conviction and an emotional connection to each note. If we give each of the students five-years to develop, I'd personally see the latter student in-recital, but that's just my opinion.
I could spend 8 hours a day for the rest of my life practising the easiest of these pieces, and even if I lived to 103 I would never come close to being able to play it at half speed. *sob*
I t is called 'the school of volocity' you miht have noticed?. That is th e whole point of it.The speed, however, is only obtained by a lot of slow practice.
i recognize this is an autoplay. but how can a computer produce so beautiful and delight tone and dynamics? it will be interesting to hear beethoven with this
Bizarre comment! These pieces are intended to be performed at this tempo. Did you know that Czerny was a student and close friend of Beethoven? Czerny went on to develop Liszt's talent as an exceptionally virtuosic pianist.
If you listen to Mozart's 10th piano concerto 3rd mvt there is a spot that sounds like and has the same melody found here. I believe this composer quoted him in no. 7. found at 4:41 to 5:00 here th-cam.com/video/QX59fIdjJXI/w-d-xo.html
The sound is of course terrible, but besides that, imagine a video were you could see the hands of a brilliant pianist performing it along with the score. How much more useful this would be, especially at a slower tempo. And maybe even with a few tips on how to practice each exercise, what it is for, and other important technique related advice.
I have a sneaking suspicion, there might have been a pianist involved in all this. Of course, he/she is only a very minor player, but maybe he/she should have been given a mention....
@@CziffraTheThird Because at a fast tempo, the notes are bound to sound uneven. My guess is that this was played on a digital piano and then modified. You can of course prove me wrong. Show me a video of a pianist playing this at the same tempo on an acoustic piano.
I am convinced this is no computer...how radically amazing is that? What we are able to achieve and work up to! There really is no limits to the human super-mind and super-coordination, where so many people underestimate their true potential with the "built-in machines" which were made fearfully and wonderfully and then given to them for a reason!
Announcement: In the next days (I don't know exactly when, I hope before Christmas)... I'll start uploading a new edition of a huge collection of Czerny's etudes: new recordings with in some cases (e.g. op.139) more accurate tempos, and perhaps a slightly better sound (unfortunately still "home-made" recordings).
This new edition will start with opus 139, and then, when available, other sets!
cleador2806 -- .....and No. 38...how much that Chopin Étude owes to Czerny...
Why are you using the words “home recordings” to describe computer performances?
@@brianbernstein3826 because they are home recordings
@@cleador2806 it's clearly a computer and not a human playing this. the notes are perfectly even as are the dynamics. it's obvious to anyone
@@brianbernstein3826 maybe you are just mad because you are bad. Just because it's good doesn't mean it's fake . I know a bunch of people who can play this perfectly.
First Half:
1. Downward Scales
2. Upward LH Scales - 0:32
3. RH Arpeggio Riffs - 1:08
4. Comme le vent - 1:41
5. Scales Galore - 2:06
6. 4 Finger Exercise - 3:17
7. Michael Jackson - 4:00
8. 12345-342 - 5:01
9. Snake - 6:14
10. Boogie - 7:47
11. Climbing - 8:56
12. Two Handed Arpeggios - 10:30
13. Shivering - 11:17
14. Bumps - 12:25
15. Chromatic Terror - 13:19
16. Nontuplets - 14:57
17. Third Companions - 16:55
18. Sextuplets - 17:41
19. Pachelbel - 19:10
20. Hanon on Steroids - 20:00
Second Half:
21. Storm Waves - 21:14
22. Repeated Notes - 22:05
23. 543 Terror - 23:43
24. Sprinkler - 24:57
25. Double Handed Scales - 26:03
26. Sparkly Scales - 27:10
27. Double Tremolos 0 28:18
28. Octave Climbs - 29:03
29. Scales in Thirds - 30:18
30. Baroque Toccata - 31:04
31. Chromatic Scales - 32:17
32. Alternating Arpeggios - 34:58
33. Sextuplet Climbing - 36:28
34. LH Waves - 37:57
35. Broken Octave Scales - 40:12
36. Contrary Motion Scales - 41:56
37. Tenth Companions - 43:27
38. Third Tremolos - 46:08
39. Czerny's Sunshine - 48:32
40. Bravura Finale - 50:24
NO
I think i see Michael Jackson there
Is your nickname for the 4th piece "Comme Le Vent" derived from Alkan's Op. 39/1?
Pachelbel 😂😂
@@Yubin_Lee_Doramelin Most likely. Btw love Alkan
0:00 - no. 1
0:33 - no. 2
1:09 - no. 3
1:41 - no. 4
2:07 - no. 5
3:17 - no. 6
4:01 - no. 7
5:02 - no. 8
6:15 - no. 9
7:48 - no. 10
8:58 - no. 11
10:31 - no. 12
11:17 - no. 13
12:25 - no. 14
13:20 - no. 15
14:58 - no. 16
16:56 - no. 17
17:42 - no. 18
19:11 - no. 19
20:02 - no. 20
21:16 - no. 21
22:07 - no. 22
23:45 - no. 23
24:57 - no. 24
26:04 - no. 25
27:10 - no. 26
28:19 - no. 27
29:04 - no. 28
30:19 - no. 29
31:05 - no. 30
32:18 - no. 31
34:58 - no. 32
36:29 - no. 33
37:58 - no. 34
40:14 - no. 35
41:57 - no. 36
43:28 - no. 37
46:10 - no. 38
48:33 - no. 39
50:24 - no. 40
16, 21, 27
31
No.27 reminds me *_A LOT_* like Liszt's _"Chasse Neige"_ Transcendental Étude no.12 S.137
@@icravecheddar7401 OMG I know that etude. How did I not notice the similarities till
Now 😅?!!
Thanks you!
“What’s your favorite one?”
“Molto Allegro”
prestississisimo
Lol. I placed nicknames.
@@Santosificationable oh hi ur here too XD
It brings back childhood nightmares. And that was at only half the speed.
What you think is half the speed is actually the right speed. This version is done by entering notes into a piano roll in some program like Cubase and then writing in the expression aka modulation. In the 19th century, it would have been played such that the note value in the metronome equation would have represented two ticks of the metronome. That is not available in Digital Audio Workstations other than by adjusting to half the speed shown. Whoever did this did not take that into account, with the resultant loss of clarity.
@@johnb6723 wrong, that metronome nonsense has long since been debunked. Czerny was incredibly gifted on a level that’s extremely rare with pianos with faster action
Carl Czerny op. 299, 40 studies
1) 0:00
2) 0:33
3) 1:08
4) 1:41
5) 2:07
6) 3:17
7) 4:00
8) 5:06
9) 6:13
10) 7:48
11) 8:58
12) 10:31
13) 11:16
14) 12:25
15) 13:20
16) 14:58
17) 16:56
18) 17:42
19) 19:11
20) 20:00
21) 21:15
22) 22:08
23) 23:44
24) 24:58
25) 26:03
26) 27:10
27) 28:18
28) 29:04
29) 30:19
30) 31:04
31) 32:20
32) 34:58
33) 36:29
34) 37:58
35) 40:13
36) 41:57
37) 43:27
38) 46:10
39) 48:33
40) 50:24
Morgan Martinez. Thank you :)
Hey... no.20 20:00^^
@@hyj7240 that's funny actually 😂
@@morganmartinez8420 Thanks!!!^^
@Machinomus [GD] me too! I was looking for that one as well so I decided to put a timeline!
I utterly love the very clear Beethoven reference...Czerny truly loved his master!
Other composers: Adagio, Andante, Allegretto...
Czerny: Allegro, Presto, Prestissimo, Molto Allegro
nice one!
Riccardo -- m'Mannn Czerny....ALWAYS on Speed!
Alkan: Vivacissimamente, Prestissimamente (both are in his music, op. 27 and Op. 39-1)
#40 in this volume is 'Allegrissimo, quasi presto'. That seems a bit like splitting hairs, no? lol
@@wilh3lmmusic And also Prestissimo in "Scherzo-diabolico" in G minor op.39-3 (1857)))
That brings back memories...played nr. 24 for my music school graduation - in tempo. Now, 40 years later, tempo has dropped a bit. All the notes are still there though.
Welcome, my pupil, to your first day at the School of Velocity.
Lesson one:
*has finger seizure*
Okay, dear student. Now you try.
I laughed so hard at this. Thank you.
This is so accurate it's amazing
Lesson One: Git gud skrub
Lesson Two: See lesson one
I couldnt stop laughing. This is one of the best comments ive read.
theradioflier kill me
Am I the only one thinking the melodies are perfect choices of the background music on an ice cream truck? 😂🙄️
It's a very good idea.
For me the melodies would be a little bit caothic for an ice crea truck background hehe
36:29 . 2 or 3 balls?
A very fast ice cream truck
100 likes
I cant even play the wrong notes that fast!
Sad Raccoon take my like, you made me chuckle
Sadly, it’s quite slow!
Nah I can at least play the wrong notes that fast
Played impossibly fast, needs the whole beat treatment (see Authenticsound channel)
Bill Meacham oh wow u commented this a year ago...
Fun fact: I lent this book from a public library somewhere back in the 90's.
Somehow, I never returned it and got letters from them for 15 years or so afterwards. I haven't back there since I'm afraid what they will say.
But I still have it, and plan to return it someday =)
Return it on your deathbed!
Mail it
this sounds like those old Fortepianos. I like it! BTW for all those complaining about the speed, just want to tell you that this is supposed to be fast. maybe you don't achieve this speed but the purpose of this book is to play as fast, relaxed and clear as you can.
21:15 probably my favourite I played so far
Only two people can play this well.
Czerny himself and LISZT
YES. LISZT.
Liszt is stronger than one punch man
@@xiguan5156 fuck yea
Perhaps even Alkan too (in thirds and sixths...)
And don’t forget Mereaux!
Czerny was Liszt's teacher.
33:35 is so satisfying
Teacher: here’s the bill for the class
Mom: why is it so expensive?
Teacher: it includes the medical bills
Mom._.
it should instead read:
WARNING: Correctly Playing the Following Will Injure the Player
@@masonfreeman4991 Solution - use the double beat metronome practice as it was how things were done in the time of Mozart, Beethoven, Czerny and Liszt and even beyond.
if Finale keeps playing this fast and accurately, it's gonna be a concert pianist any day now
OH MY!!! Well that escalated quickly.
This is amazing. Wow!
The description is a *helpful* list of tempo markings.
No. 34 killed my fingers, my social life and my will to live
Wow, man. So fast and clear.
Jesmond Tay computer plays
Many thanks.
32:57 compare this to Flight of the Bumblebee, I bet Czerny will definitely win
Chopin Etude op 10 no 2
@@arvindramesh6442 no, compare chopin op 10 no 2 to czerny op 365 no 19
Compare Le Chemin de fer to this
I love how No. 39 sounds in this soundfont. Particularly the fortissimo section.
This is supposed to be fast.
The school of velocity are exercices.
People tend not to believe one can play with such rapidity.. Upon hearing Claudio Colombo's interpretations of The School of Velocity, it sounds programmed for sure. What needs to be noticed is that the bmp sits at around 104-108. This means the pianists fingers will be performing at twice that speed, at 208-216bpm. They are designed to enhance the ability of the virtuosic performer! Just like Hanon's exercises for the virtuoso.
Plus back in Czerny's time, the touch weight of the keys was a lot lighter. Making it technically a tad easier to play at those speeds.
There are many machine performances and claudio colombo is one of these.
This velocity school was originally written for two pianos only until 30, the second part is in imslp and there is another school of speed which is Op.834 and is called new School of velocity
17 : 16:55
19 : 19:09
21 : 21:15
LOL
17 is fucken gnarly
Would it not be most logical to at least mention the pianist playing here ? Why did he/she get no credits ?
It's secretly Liszt reincarnated
Because they are held in a room with no light , and hit with a stick for missed notes ...
Ah, the versatile Ling ling is back 🌝
Seems to be midi created. To play so many notes so fast with absolute perfection is most improbable.
@@wearewinning3151 it's definitely a real person. most professional pianists can play at the tempo shown here
É demais de emocionante.!🇧🇷🇧🇷🕊️
As delusional as I may sound, I don't care. According to the absolute limitations of the human coordination of the brain and hands being pushed to the possible max, I was questioning for the first 4 minutes whether or not this is actually acoustically played by someone on an authentic period instrument, or if this was simply done with MIDI...Well, let me tell you something...after hearing number 7...I am wholeheartedly convinced(unless someone respectfully proves me wrong), this is actually no computer. That was a true human touch that I realized was doing this...what an utterly unbelievable achievement here. I was feeling true and sincere human convicted emotion here which made my hairs stand on end...Give the bloody pianist credit!! And I will keep on listening to be genuinely inspired. Moreover, that No.7 is actually a truly sublime, heartwrenchingly beautiful little masterpiece...what a piercing and yearning, yet simple melody that master Czerny wrote. Wow, I am going to do this.
Is it Libetta playing here? He's the only one I know that does this sort of stuff.
@@Santosificationable Does not sound like Libetta to me. Neuburger does it also, But no idea who is this here. But there are millions of pianists world wide who can play this.
Play something slowly and then increase the tempo by a software. It will sound exactly like this.
Number 21 seems to be an hybrid of mazeppa from Liszt because the appoggiatura and op 740 no 50 from Czerny because of the beginning medoly. 21:15- here It is
It's absolutely possible to play this fast if you drink ten cups of Kenya AA coffee!!!
Probably done by the machine, even Arnold said you can't better Skynet...
put the play back speed to maximum and see what happens…
Great!
beautiful
The musicality automatically shows when you play the piece close to the original speed.
Best pieces for practising.
Thank you.
Me imagino al genio que toco esto, pero que velocidad impresionante
I finished no.39. I loved that one
Simple Truth only if it is played at a reasonable speed.
Bravo! great job by recording this, really!. What I don't understand is why the recording sounds if it was made with an early 2000's cellphone. You shoud record this professionally, I'd buy it right away!
Its not a human playing…. notice how notes are exactly even in spacing and loudness. It’s a computer
Wow..........this is for Argerich, Horowitz, Richter,,,,,,,,,and for the player!!!!!!!!!!! Wath a velocity!!!!! Beatiful............
Visit my youtube Channel i have unknow Czerny Music
1:43 5:01 7:48 11:17 14:58 23:44 27:09 32:18 36:29 43:28 46:10 48:33
7:48 thank you very much 😇
Thanks for uploading!
It hurts my fingers just to listen to this
Wonderful.
note: the n.1 (presto) is played slower then 108.
its impossible to play as 108.
this is meant to the begginer musician.
czerny was a whole-beat metronome guy.
No. 16 is very fast, but angelic at the same time.
So glad I found Chopin and got out of this mess...
Do you play Chopin?
I do - Recently played his Polonaise-fantaisie, Ballades, Scherzos, and considering the La ci darem la mano variations next spring... But learning Chopin's posthumous C-sharp Minor Nocturne is part of what originally got me out of obligations to my Czerny 299 book in early lessons. Discovering Chopin opened my eyes to the world of music beyond the pedagogical track students tend to stay-on under the guidance of most teachers. Hands down, I probably wouldn't be learning Rachmaninoff's Piano Sonata No. 2 today if I hadn't made such a jump earlier in childhood.
It is strange, but for me there has been nothing that has helped me to improve so quickly as playing czerny. I think dedicated practice of things like school of velocity make playing chopin relatively easy, 'gradus ad parnassum' and all that.
I empathize with your school of thought as well. On my hand is the mentality of confronting and solving technical problems in the music on-the-fly with the mentality of milking the technical and musical "lessons" from a passage of concert music, whereas the Czerny route allows the student to encounter many similar situations early-on in the comfort of an exercise book, before testing the waters and building up gradually to more advanced but nevertheless conventional staples of repertoire.
One of these students likely tends to develop a rock solid technique early-on, while the other develops an early passion for unconventional repertoire, in-which they develop conviction and an emotional connection to each note. If we give each of the students five-years to develop, I'd personally see the latter student in-recital, but that's just my opinion.
@@tedpiano you should touch in Chopin etudes. Chopin etudes is relationship with Czerny etudes
Yes, I also had to practice. Bravo
no. 3 sounds beautiful
It is played on a real piano? If so, can you make a video at least one of them at that speed to see the hands?
It’s a computer…
@@brianbernstein3826 It isn’t. You’re just jealous
мое далекое детство за роялем может быть если буду слушать и играть моя душа помолодеет вопрос thanks for postingand bravo for pianist
I could spend 8 hours a day for the rest of my life practising the easiest of these pieces, and even if I lived to 103 I would never come close to being able to play it at half speed.
*sob*
8 hours a day would mean 6.5 hours wasted daily 😂
Ok if 8 hours for 103 years can't reach you to half the speed than you're an insect that can't make a living
It's too fast for a student!
+Apostolos Apostolidis You take your time !
+Apostolos Apostolidis You take your time !
I 11 year old and I play no. 13
I t is called 'the school of volocity' you miht have noticed?. That is th e whole point of it.The speed, however, is only obtained by a lot of slow practice.
Nicolas Hawtrey I know but think that this velocity requires many years hard working for a student. It's very very very fast.
Czerny is my favorite pianist.
@1:01 Why did the pianist play the last 2 bars incorrectly? He treated them as if the quarter note was at half ... ???
i recognize this is an autoplay. but how can a computer produce so beautiful and delight tone and dynamics? it will be interesting to hear beethoven with this
+s vallejo hilarious and original
This is not an autoplay. A real person is playing this
Cole Christie this is a MIDI.
Bizarre comment! These pieces are intended to be performed at this tempo. Did you know that Czerny was a student and close friend of Beethoven? Czerny went on to develop Liszt's talent as an exceptionally virtuosic pianist.
Midis are usually taken from actual performances.
PianoReader is doing the same on their synthesia youtube videos.
Oh.. Czerny
Thank you
This is répertoire of final exam of primary school in Korea! :)
Grand Adrien only primary😨 what about after??
@@antonygonzalez1672 liszt,chopin,rachmaninoff and other kinds of torture etudes
Thanks ....👍🏾🐞
Chapeau!
Thanks!
I'm deeply impressed by your playing.
This is quite discouraging if not depressing.
Who the fu*k playing these!?!?!?
The most musical performance of these etudes!!
30:18
Now i feel like i don't play the song fast enough
Study No. 7 reminds me of “Jolly Old Saint Nicholas” for some reason
If you listen to Mozart's 10th piano concerto 3rd mvt there is a spot that sounds like and has the same melody found here. I believe this composer quoted him in no. 7. found at 4:41 to 5:00 here th-cam.com/video/QX59fIdjJXI/w-d-xo.html
I keep reminding myself that is a technique exercise and not a performance or recital piece.
Yeah, musically this isn’t very good, but as a practical excercize it has its place
and I thought Mozart was all scales at times
😀🔫
Hahaha
Please do it.
Lmfao
Good 😃
If you are a student there are easier exercices by Czerny (op 139 and 599).
The sound is of course terrible, but besides that, imagine a video were you could see the hands of a brilliant pianist performing it along with the score. How much more useful this would be, especially at a slower tempo. And maybe even with a few tips on how to practice each exercise, what it is for, and other important technique related advice.
Wow,what the name of pianist?
5yo Japanese kid
Or Chiffra
Do you seriously believe that this is a real pianist? Every 16th-note has the exact same duration and velocity. It's obviously created from a midi.
ANIME
midi
Звук, как у мех. пианино, ощущение, что увеличили искусственно темп, как шарманка " без души "..
may i ask you if there is a manipulation of speed of the original recording?
pianistjustforfun No there isnt, its years of training and conditioning, definitely possible
It's an autoplay, all you hear is a computer
Morgan Martinez yeah。。。
@@morganmartinez8420 I can hear lots of tiny mistakes though.
I have a sneaking suspicion, there might have been a pianist involved in all this. Of course, he/she is only a very minor player, but maybe he/she should have been given a mention....
@@Thefare1234 Why not?
@@CziffraTheThird Because at a fast tempo, the notes are bound to sound uneven. My guess is that this was played on a digital piano and then modified. You can of course prove me wrong. Show me a video of a pianist playing this at the same tempo on an acoustic piano.
First exercise, I only need to work on right hand dexterity.
Second exercise, insert left hand dexterity.
48:50 in this part does the first best of the third measure sound way lower than it really is?
Czerny would be proud! This is suppose to be the end result.
This is a midi by Sibelius? Left hand is horrible ..
Just a small detail - who is on piano ? Surely, it was not a computer ?
I am convinced this is no computer...how radically amazing is that? What we are able to achieve and work up to! There really is no limits to the human super-mind and super-coordination, where so many people underestimate their true potential with the "built-in machines" which were made fearfully and wonderfully and then given to them for a reason!
Is only fantastic! Who thé pianist?
This is insanely good. Who is the performer?
A computer.
@@KerimWirthSuperLps Oh, that makes sense.
lol!
WHO IS THE PERFORMER??
Хорошее исполнение Этюдов К.Черни op.299.Но темп" заоблачный"!Кто исполняет?
He plays even faster than the indicated tempo !
mistake: 4:46 goes up to e again, not down to c ;p
shut
The video seems to be accelerated. Sound of the piano is unnatural.
At 1:59 they missed a chord, but great playing
So most of these are either presto or molto allegro ;)
How tf do you even play no. 16
no. 29 was my favourite
Lol 😂
I’m playing no 29
Es muy rapido para mi / its soo quick for me
wow!
СПАСИБО !
Stop liking your own comment
This isn't even as fast as the tempo markings!
this is what chewing 5 gum feels like