When im not stirring up trouble on this channel, you will find me over at my other channel : 5 Reason Why, answering the questions nobody asked. So head on over, check out latest video and please oh please subscribe so I can sleep at night. th-cam.com/video/qo3ZiUTWx6I/w-d-xo.html
@@humanidadeparalela4572 actually no, The flat earth cult was started by Samuel Rowbotham about 150 years ago, He was an actual snake oil salesman, The nonsense was plagerised by Eric Dubious who is your high priest, Flat earth is physically impossible thats why you have less than zero evidence, Welcome to reality, Welcome to the globe slowly rotating at 0.000694rpm!
If I didn't know any better, I'd say this video is conclusive evidence that the body of water between the camera and the target Island was CURVED! WHO KNEW???
Great video showing the effect of the curve.... but........of course you know its down to waves blocking the view at the lower level..or refraction... i've got some similar videos using ships as a reference...the amount of grief you get from the FE community...lol maybe one they'll realise...
At first I wasn't sure what the 'warning' was about. But seeing the video I realize for flat-earthers this is like putting a red cloth in front of a bull. 🤣😂
Always nice to see your work. I know I’ve mentioned before I also have the P1000. Even though it’s a niche camera it’s a ball to use! Just an FYI. I have found when rendering (I use Movavi) I use the highest setting on the stabilizing feature to help smooth out the tripod ‘jitters’ that are almost impossible avoid. It reallly works quite well. You are able to pan more smoothly than I, even though I have a decent video tripod. Happy shooting! 😊
I don’t often use a tripod, this time it was a mini pod coupled with the sand from the beach for the low shot and I closed it up and used it as a monopod to pivot off a metal Rod for the higher shot. You nailed your point though, the shakes shake is real. I use Topaz when I’m not lazy to remove some of the jitter, 😁
Bel video! Domanda: gli alberi oltre a vedersi tagliati in basso, non dovrebbero vedersi anche inclinati all’indietro? Trattandosi di una curva verso il basso
С висоти 0.3м за горизонтом должно было скрыться 33метра, а с высоты 20м невидно должно бить 3.5м за горизонтом. Но мы видим полностью пляж на острове. Как же я люблю плоскость.
6:22 this is absolutely stunning, seeing the buoys at the top of the visible water. They are simply at the maximum viewing distance of the water, which is considered the horizon and is much nearer as one might expect. Flat earther debunked again.
I think trees appear too big over such a distance. Try to verify this by filming the trees from a shorter distance on land and then see from what distance they appear at the size we see them here. From that you can calculate the magnification. If you get this right you should be able to understand why the trees appear cut off.
Take a right triangle and calculate its angle (the viewing angle looking towards the right angle from ground level). Keep the height of the triangle the same (above the right angle), but increase the distance of the side of the triangle on the ground. Repeat this process several times using SOH-CAH-TOA and the Pythagorean Theorem. You'll find that the viewing angle gets small very quickly, but there are no curves because all the math is done with a straight edge triangle. I can stand on the ground getting photos of airplanes looking like they are at eye level if I am just a couple miles away and the plane is at the height of a mountain range. If you don't understand the math, then find a math teacher to explain it. You can test this with a house by standing close enough to tough the house and trying to look into the second story window. Walk ten feet away from the building and try to look into the window again. Repeat that process until you see into the window. It won't take much time
He moved 23km from trees and that didn't let him get a better view on the land next to trees. In fact, it was hidden by water instead. Not sure how is your explanation is related to what was shown in the video
@@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595 the math is simple math taught to children. If you can't understand it, then find a math teacher to explain it. Also, moisture in the air will distort what you can see. Give it some thought about what you are actually seeing and why things are happening
@@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595 the math is simple math taught to children. If you can't understand it, then find a math teacher to explain it. Also, moisture in the air will distort what you can see. Give it some thought about what you are actually seeing and why things are happening
@@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595 Hosea 4:6. Go talk to a math teacher who can draw up the triangle, angles and show the calculated math to you visually. There are also videos demonstrating the law of perspective of objects at short and long distances that show things can be hidden from view across flat planes. I gave you the information, you need to take the time to think about it and do the work to research it. I won't be helping you further.
@@loasisapokalyptik2043 Lol Obviously not a bot as I posted a relevant comment, Obviously not a clown as I haven't fallen for the flat earth scam, Are you paid too be a shill? or have you just been brainwashed?
Thanks for demonstrating that increased elevation increases angular resolution. Unresolved subjects blur and disappear bottom up, even over level water and dry salt flats. When elevation changes, the horizon line changes, so the vanishing point changes. Horizon is always eye-level.
@@kathyweckerle6880 horizon is only eye level if you are submerged in water, The horizon never rises too eye level, Things disappear bottom first because of curvature it wouldn’t happen on a space pizza.
@@dogwalker666 there’s no space pizza (disc in space). That is a straw man fallacy. That might be what the “flat earth society” psyop shows, the same society a few presidents mentioned in speeches.
@@kathyweckerle6880 Lol you need a refund from your art lessons Eye level is Not the horizon, You getting that wrong is very embarrassing for you, Eye level is a vertical line from your Eyes, Hence Eye level, So for eye level to be the horizon you need to dig a 2 meter hole and jump in! Oopsies.
When im not stirring up trouble on this channel, you will find me over at my other channel : 5 Reason Why, answering the questions nobody asked.
So head on over, check out latest video and please oh please subscribe so I can sleep at night.
th-cam.com/video/qo3ZiUTWx6I/w-d-xo.html
You love winding up flatopians 😂
@@dogwalker666 :O Would i do that???
@@SuperZoomVideos 🤷♂️🤣
@@dogwalker666FLAT EARTH SINCE ALWAYS.
@@humanidadeparalela4572 actually no, The flat earth cult was started by Samuel Rowbotham about 150 years ago, He was an actual snake oil salesman, The nonsense was plagerised by Eric Dubious who is your high priest,
Flat earth is physically impossible thats why you have less than zero evidence,
Welcome to reality, Welcome to the globe slowly rotating at 0.000694rpm!
If I didn't know any better, I'd say this video is conclusive evidence that the body of water between the camera and the target Island was CURVED!
WHO KNEW???
Nah mate, can’t be, that crazy talk, URE CRAZY BRO!’
Great video showing the effect of the curve.... but........of course you know its down to waves blocking the view at the lower level..or refraction... i've got some similar videos using ships as a reference...the amount of grief you get from the FE community...lol maybe one they'll realise...
You forgot Flurf-spective, 😂
I would not hold my breath waiting for that to happen. Just gonna roll with it :)
@@dogwalker666 ohhhh yes...😂😂
@@malcy34 👍🏻
Good video. Thank you for taking the time and describing the shooting scene 🎬
See I knew predators were just misunderstood, many thanks
At first I wasn't sure what the 'warning' was about. But seeing the video I realize for flat-earthers this is like putting a red cloth in front of a bull. 🤣😂
Which is something I would never….ever….🛑🛑🛑🐂
20M waves confirmed. Wild!
Always nice to see your work. I know I’ve mentioned before I also have the P1000. Even though it’s a niche camera it’s a ball to use! Just an FYI. I have found when rendering (I use Movavi) I use the highest setting on the stabilizing feature to help smooth out the tripod ‘jitters’ that are almost impossible avoid. It reallly works quite well. You are able to pan more smoothly than I, even though I have a decent video tripod. Happy shooting! 😊
I don’t often use a tripod, this time it was a mini pod coupled with the sand from the beach for the low shot and I closed it up and used it as a monopod to pivot off a metal Rod for the higher shot.
You nailed your point though, the shakes shake is real. I use Topaz when I’m not lazy to remove some of the jitter, 😁
Comment section is absolutely wild. I though FE theory died off. Boy, was I wrong.
Ohhh no no, I would argue it’s going the other way
It is actually GAINING traction as the "Anti-science" morons have the right to speak, and they speak louder than regular people.
Bel video! Domanda: gli alberi oltre a vedersi tagliati in basso, non dovrebbero vedersi anche inclinati all’indietro? Trattandosi di una curva verso il basso
С висоти 0.3м за горизонтом должно было скрыться 33метра, а с высоты 20м невидно должно бить 3.5м за горизонтом. Но мы видим полностью пляж на острове. Как же я люблю плоскость.
6:22 this is absolutely stunning, seeing the buoys at the top of the visible water. They are simply at the maximum viewing distance of the water, which is considered the horizon and is much nearer as one might expect. Flat earther debunked again.
Great comparison video-went to bed early last night and forgot to watch the video-but you’ll forgive me-😅Thanks for the video I enjoyed it 👍
Here’s boss, hope ure doing well
@@SuperZoomVideos yeah I’m good mate just sticking to it
@@barrygiddey9139legend.
wow. you just see the swell. i never seen it this clearly. thanks.
tkz sir
Chur
I think trees appear too big over such a distance. Try to verify this by filming the trees from a shorter distance on land and then see from what distance they appear at the size we see them here. From that you can calculate the magnification. If you get this right you should be able to understand why the trees appear cut off.
Literally a photo of the trees close up in the video
You would seem to be wrong.
earth round or flat?
Roundish
People arguing over the demonstration of a superzoom? Really ?
100% every time, death, taxes and this same argument on repeat. 😂
Take a right triangle and calculate its angle (the viewing angle looking towards the right angle from ground level). Keep the height of the triangle the same (above the right angle), but increase the distance of the side of the triangle on the ground. Repeat this process several times using SOH-CAH-TOA and the Pythagorean Theorem. You'll find that the viewing angle gets small very quickly, but there are no curves because all the math is done with a straight edge triangle. I can stand on the ground getting photos of airplanes looking like they are at eye level if I am just a couple miles away and the plane is at the height of a mountain range. If you don't understand the math, then find a math teacher to explain it. You can test this with a house by standing close enough to tough the house and trying to look into the second story window. Walk ten feet away from the building and try to look into the window again. Repeat that process until you see into the window. It won't take much time
He moved 23km from trees and that didn't let him get a better view on the land next to trees. In fact, it was hidden by water instead. Not sure how is your explanation is related to what was shown in the video
@@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595 the math is simple math taught to children. If you can't understand it, then find a math teacher to explain it. Also, moisture in the air will distort what you can see. Give it some thought about what you are actually seeing and why things are happening
@@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595 the math is simple math taught to children. If you can't understand it, then find a math teacher to explain it. Also, moisture in the air will distort what you can see. Give it some thought about what you are actually seeing and why things are happening
@@ZAV1010 I did, you didn't. Give it a thought and realize that nothing hides the lower part of the shore if earth is flat
@@hopmajibhohepeajibho7595 Hosea 4:6. Go talk to a math teacher who can draw up the triangle, angles and show the calculated math to you visually. There are also videos demonstrating the law of perspective of objects at short and long distances that show things can be hidden from view across flat planes. I gave you the information, you need to take the time to think about it and do the work to research it. I won't be helping you further.
You've just proven that the world has a curve, or that is one massive 20 meter wave.
Definitely a wave 🤔
Could this be any clearer? If Flat Earth fans are honest, they just need to wave the white flag!!
I have an idea. Can u show any star, the moon or the sun behind the horizont? I guest its imposible
@@javatp9736 refraction exists, if the weather is right you can see thing’s below the horizon
1, Learn to spell, then maybe people will take you seriously.
2, What does this question have to do with the video?
@@chrisbolland5634 can you show me any star under the astronomical horizont? please.
Open your eyes on Flat Earth
Open your brain on our beautiful globe slowly rotating at 0.000694rpm (Thanks Bob).
@@dogwalker666 Are you a bot or a clown 🤡 ?
@@loasisapokalyptik2043 Lol Obviously not a bot as I posted a relevant comment, Obviously not a clown as I haven't fallen for the flat earth scam,
Are you paid too be a shill? or have you just been brainwashed?
@@loasisapokalyptik2043 Well I didn't fall for the flat earth scam so neither, You however think flatopia is possible 🤣😁🤣
@@dogwalker666 Ton globe viole toutes les lois de la physique, ton espace est intersidérant d'incohérences...
Thanks for demonstrating that increased elevation increases angular resolution. Unresolved subjects blur and disappear bottom up, even over level water and dry salt flats.
When elevation changes, the horizon line changes, so the vanishing point changes. Horizon is always eye-level.
@@kathyweckerle6880 horizon is only eye level if you are submerged in water,
The horizon never rises too eye level,
Things disappear bottom first because of curvature it wouldn’t happen on a space pizza.
@@dogwalker666 there’s no space pizza (disc in space). That is a straw man fallacy. That might be what the “flat earth society” psyop shows, the same society a few presidents mentioned in speeches.
@@dogwalker666 you might need some art lessons. Eye-level is the Horizon line.
@@kathyweckerle6880 Lol you need a refund from your art lessons Eye level is Not the horizon, You getting that wrong is very embarrassing for you, Eye level is a vertical line from your Eyes, Hence Eye level, So for eye level to be the horizon you need to dig a 2 meter hole and jump in!
Oopsies.
@@dogwalker666horizon is horizontal.
I won’t respond anymore to you.