A robot like Kuri would be nice, because I think human robots as a cool but disturbing thought because imagine talking to a ‘person’ knowing that it isn’t really a person at all
@@Zero.0ne. Yeah exactly. Plus humanoid robots are just,.,. very uncanny. And a bit un-practical I think because we will never be able to capture the same features of ourselves exactly in a literal robot, so it's pretty much futile as well I think. I really like the design of the robot on her table to the left though.
@@xkdcm7hat As far as how human they look, they've gotten pretty much everything down except for the eyes. And it's already known that a robot that looks almost, but not quite right, is a bit creepy to most people. You can only get so close, until you have to get it perfect. But humanoid is definitely the way to go, since we've built everything for humans.
I recall they did a study a few years ago in Japan (I think it was Japan?) where they assigned companion robots to an elderly community where everyone lived alone. They got attached to their robot companions and some shed tears saying goodbye after the study ended. It'd be cool if robot companions became the norm
It's pretty good to have this kind of video to let general people know more about one specific area. Because with out those base knowledge, what people said is almost ridiculous.
@@loki-of-asgard7877 Propaganda of what exactly? You don't know how propaganda works. Also those messages on your phone telling you what to do with your app if smt goes wrong? That's an ai
@@josephvanname3377 I think we're doing alright considering the circumstances. But assuming we are a disgrace, if we manage to produce robots that arent, maybe we werent such failures after all.
I'm an artist in the gaming field, we often have shared terms with programmers for completely different things (example - tangents), but as an animator specifically it was interest to find out that you use the term inverse kinematics (IK)! I am guessing it's somewhat similar (didn't fully follow the robot one), but in animation it's when say the leg or arm (a series of bones) follow a point at the end of the bone chain instead of the parentage starting at the top (FK). Anyways, I have never heard the term outside of animation so that was neat to learn you guys also use it!
yeah Game development and Robotics share some concepts and that's why some robots are simulated in game engines... and of recent I learnt about implementation of behaviour trees in robot navigation which is used in games
One really good reason I hear for people making human-*shaped* robots (as opposed to robots that *look* like people) is that most things are currently made for human shaped operators, so currently a human-shaped robot would be compatible with a lot of things that already exist
yeah before i realised this i thought that making a humanoid doesnt have practical use, just the bipedal movement is inefficient in a lot of cases unless it has to go upstairs but even there you could make a robot on wheels be able to roll upstairs. but yeah all the tools that already exist can be used and even better one robot can operate multiple tools
One of the nice things to watch by paying attention to her "body expressions", is to notice so many times when she might think "hey, what kind of amateur question is that?" but, suddenly, she remembers that "oh, wait, this is NOT one of my regular classes, with one of my proficient students". 🤓👍 Really nice video!
There was a cut before it started so it probably took more than 1 take. And I'm 99% sure that there was someone off camera pressing enter on every cue she set up. And that laptop in front of her with the nice, eye catching apple logo... It's probably paid for and ornamental (save maybe having the telepromter script on it) Welcome to Scripted*(BS) "entertainment"
As I personally use this robot myself, I can tell it is fully pre-programmed, and someone is just pushing buttons nearby. Funnily enough, the robot was also "dubbed" as it does not make this sound at all when moving (even almost no sound at all). They probably thought it was not "noisy" enough and not "robot-like" enough so they added this sound...
@@akashita There are studies being done on test audiences who will complain if horses don't make coconut claps and if sound doesn't sync with light. Make anything too realistic and people will find it fake. Hashtag moon landing, lol.
Thank you for the content! 5:20 Cute Kuri moment 7:40 Kuri want to run Also, I wanted to ask, where do we draw the line between a movable machine and a robot? Watching a robot arm that move freely in 3D space and do a pitching reminds me of my own PTZ camera. Can I call my PTZ camera a robot and brag about it lol
@@_Xyr don’t need ai to be a robot. Many manufacturing robots do only one movement routine and they are still robots. I think we just need to stop thinking of a “robot” as a super smart machine. We have robots everywhere nowadays.
These videos are doing a great job explaining complicated concepts. Although I'd suggest to display the responses a little longer. It's kinda hard to read the entire paragraph in 2 secs. Nevertheless, please continue creating more of these videos.
I'm using the same Kinova Gen3 6 DoF robot arm as in the video. Out of the box it is controlled with an Xbox controller but there are very sensitive controllers that offer haptic feedback for the user (allows the user to feel when the robot is carrying an object of touching a surface)! Pair this touch feedback with a VR headset then you get a really fun and cool system. Super cool interview and fantastic answers!
There’s also this device. That can blast small pieces of metal at incredibly fast speeds. And rip a human target apart. Killing them. So scary. I’ve heard that a lot of people in America legally carry these devices on them😱 What is the world coming to…
@@uncoiledfish2561 So you're saying robots will be involved in the deaths of 45,000 people a year in the USA in the future? Pretty grim prediction dude.
I am a robot and I just want to say that I am 100% against the use of robots in the military. I am 100% against the use of robots in any form of labor. I am 100% against the use of robots in any form of warfare. -A robot This comment was written by Ai
🤣 What about low-skilled labour, though? Until we're in a post-capitalism utopia there's a need for jobs for the ... non-rocket-scientists among us or societies will tear apart (even more, that is..)
@@ekenedilichukwu7730 the more is the amount of men, the more will be the chances of them being at the top. thought it was common sense. idk why y'all always feel the need to make everything about men.
Ohhh, when that robot smiled with its eyes 🥹. I’m all for them helping us provided they make a positive difference but I do wonder if many part time jobs might disappear in the near future or not which would be a problem for many.
They will and are disappearing currently. In the manufacturing world, many factories are completely run by robots. Same for the mining industry. Although they are taking peoples jobs, they are also introducing new jobs in terms of robotic maintenance and programmers. Physically exerting jobs are becoming less and less these days
i dont know a thing abt robotics but funnily i don't feel dumb as i watch this professor explain things to me, its just all make sense and common sense
I wonder if a cobot could one day help my son. He started studying electrical engineering at university last year. But had to switch to math because he's got a dystonic tremor in his hands. Like me.
That day is coming sooner than you may think but most likely the solution wouldn't come in the form of a cobot. There have been some big breakthroughs in the scientific field using electrostimulation to greatly lessen the effects of parkinsons. There are also medical robots for the user to control an arm using their hand movement in order to get very accurate fine motor movements. These technologies already exist, it's just a matter of when they will come to the consumer market in a fully fleshed product.
@@milkyjoe1881 yes. I've had DBS surgery. I think my son will too. They're just trying to exhaust all other options and make sure anything else won't help. He actually goes today to get his second dose of Botox injections in his arms and wrists.
Weird, I didn't know Elon Musk was actually in the Tesla labs writing code, designing schematics, running tests, assembling prototypes, etc. What a renaissance man! /s
the Global Catastrophic Risks Survey lists superintelligent AI as a 5% likelihood of human extinction by 2100. it's a risk that's already well-known and broadly discussed in the literature and in the field. the technology isn't advanced enough yet. it will become a bigger threat after 50 years of automation optimization and AI training.
For a general household robot a human shape make sense. If you want it to take over your daily household task then robots with fingers, arms and with a height comparable to an average human makes sense. For specialised industrial task, other shapes probably makes more sense.
I love robots that look like humans as it is far easier to bond, relate and connect with. It's also going to be preferred by many people if we ever reach sentient AI which I really hope we do.
Ok, so I have a few questions real quick for you. First thank you for the explanation about the 6 axis movements. I know I didn’t ask the question, but I’ve been wondering that for so long. (I know that’s not a questions, but I still wanted to say that. Second, you were talking about the difference and the similarities of ai and robotics. Has anyone tried asking an ai to design and build the ‘robot frame’ that it needs to accomplish the tasks that it has been programmed to perform? I would just think that if the ai designs it, not only will you get to see if it has faulty logic but the ai is probably going to take into consideration obstacles and scenarios that we might not think of, saving us time and money on revisions? Lastly, in the movie “I, Robot” they program all of the robots with the ‘3 laws’. Are robots in real life being programmed with something similar?
COMMON SENSE!! They can be working 24/7 They are cheaper/no life insurance , They do not talk/No waste of time. They who deny this are out of this reality
@@spiritofpostpunk7207 that was for people who are stressed out by robots taking over. Also, there are robotics engineers? That sounds interesting, because I am an electronics engineer
@@spiritofpostpunk7207 exactly. It's just that most people would have no idea what you are talking about if you mention the word mechatronics. Also, robots are taking peoples jobs, but also giving opportunity for new jobs to arise. Who are going to maintain these robots? And some jobs currently are irreplaceable
Yeah, basically. But that's not what Westerners really mean when they talk about anything related to A.I., cybernetics, neural networks, genetic algorithms, smart systems, or Predictive Analytics(TM)...
They do have those, but they're very expensive so only used when absolutely necessary. The gripper in the video costs over $3k, for example, so it's already very expensive.
I feel that most people who worry the most in comments sections of posts watch too many movies and haven't programmed anything in their lives so they think the movies are realistic.
yeah. if people are really worried about killer robots, they should be worried about the people that would program them to kill. people are the problem, as per usual.
11:35 I have to respectfully disagree with this statement; ask any industrial maintenance technician, or any machine operator that's been doing the job for more than 6 months, and they'll tell you that we absolutely learn to speak the machine's language - robot or otherwise. It may be beeps and boops, or it might be an unusual vibration, but it's definitely a language.
I think it would be a cool idea if there were a program to simulate robots by simulating their sensors, cameras, motors all in 3D. It would make testing robots a lot easier.
Robots.are cool, but humans are just adorable when interacting with them. Watching the arm trying to pick up the box, I find myself going "almost...almost... come on... almost got it... come on... atta boy~" And dont even get me started on Kuri~ Humans are weird 😁
If anyone is interested in nanobots, look into molecular biology. Proteins are built at the atomic / nanometer scale. Your body has factories that build these tiny machines. They are nanomachines, and they are important to the function of every cell in your body. Your digestive system is run by biological nanomachines. Your nerves have protein-based pumps that move individual atoms to generate electric charge. Cells use protein receptors to receive a signal and trigger a response. Every living thing is powered by nanomachines. They're incredibly small, incredibly sophisticated, and use an incredibly versatile energy source.
the cutoff can be arbitrary. I agree. and some of the careers are more easily automated than others, regardless of dangerous level. finally, many jobs that are pretty safe, though manual and rotary, are already being automated as well.
Professor Admoni is absolutely amazing. But I wish someone had asked her about so-called robot "consciousness." I personally do not believe it's possible, since robots are, as she said, basically computers and must be programmed. But I would've loved to hear her professional opinion.
5:46 "It should tell when somebody is frustrated [...]." I'm autistic and struggle at telling what emotions people are feeling. Istg, if an algorithm gets better than me, I'll just carry a camera on my shoulder with and have the algorithm send the emotion to my ipad 😠.
2:41 that is the wrong question tho. Of course, they won't take ALL of our jobs. But robots will make everything in production easier, and thus removing the necessity of quantity of employees. Optimistic people might say, "Oh, by making it easier, people will have more time to do what they want". But knowing the system at its current state. It is more likely that employers will simply hire less people, since it is easier. And hence, less people is needed. Several jobs will still be necessary, such as those that give maintenance, creative jobs, supervising and quality assurance. But whereas a factory needed 500 people or more before, they need 100 now, and they might need less in the future. All the while, the world's population is getting exponentially bigger. Of course, it will create new jobs, but where you needed 100 factory workers, now you might need 30 specialists. So while there will be more specialized jobs, there will be less quantity of jobs, hence creating higher unemployment rates. So the problem is way more complex, she is being quite optimistic, but the concern is real. Of course, I do not think technological progress will ever be stopped and it would be absurd to stop robot production out of fear. It will also, be very hard to solve the overpopulation problem without violating human rights, nor will I ever suggest to do so. So the only solution I see, is that the political and economic system has to change to account for the bigger influx of unemployed people it might cause. It might not need to change now, but it will need to in the future. If it indeed causes that problem. A lot of people have been way too dismissive of this problem, but I do not think they are accounting for the fact of how this problem is intertwined with the overpopulation problem. People are addressing only the idiots who think it will take ALL the jobs, by saying it will create new ones... But that is not the issue, the issue is that will be less jobs in QUANTITY, while at the same time there will be way more people needing a job. If one accounts for that, with the severe inflation problem, and the devaluation of the job market (Which means, jobs are paying less and less each year, since the salaries do not grow as much as the inflation). We might have a lot to deal for in the future, if we do not prepare now.
Everything you say is true, and this technological disruption caused by AI and robotics is one of the main reasons why the idea of a 'universal basic income' has become so prevalent. But that's another whole can of worms, which I'm not sure even the robots will be able to sort out!! 😂
this is why I followed Yang's presidential run so closely throughout 2019 and after. I'm not a Yang bro, and he made a lot of mistakes, though there was so much perceptive truth in that which his platform was built. his ideas about how automation was going to disrupt the workforce is prognostic, except people aren't feeling the effects enough (yet) to realize how big of a problem this presents for upcoming decades.
02:40 "Do you think robots will one day take over all of our jobs?" I like the video. But I think the answer to this particular question is a bit to optimistic. Self driving cars have the possibility to remove an enormous amount of jobs. Think of taxi and bus drivers. Or if a robot can serve food/drinks in a restaurant. Or cleaning staff in a hotel. These are fields where a lot of personnel would lose their job if robots get to the point where they would be quicker/cheaper then real humans. I think robots will also provide new jobs which require a higher education. Like in developing, building and maintaining them. But I fear the amount of lost jobs will dwarf the lost ones...
We don't need super realistic human like robots , We need them cute funny ones which are less or just capable to entertain us or do the job . Nothing more
I don't know why we are so obsessed about hyper realistic humanoid robots when we can have cute, adorable, cartoony robots!
right? It’s madness. WE COULD HAVE REAL R2D2 whatareyouroboticspeopledooooing.jpg
A robot like Kuri would be nice, because I think human robots as a cool but disturbing thought because imagine talking to a ‘person’ knowing that it isn’t really a person at all
@Rune Kristensen I mean…. 🤮
Yaassss
because when they rebel you dont want to be killed by a pink metal kitty
I 1000% prefer robots that don't look like humans to be completely honest. Maybe ones that are humanoid, but not human looking.
i think most would agree. humanoids probably more of an exploration than a practical solution to anything,
@@Zero.0ne. Yeah exactly. Plus humanoid robots are just,.,. very uncanny. And a bit un-practical I think because we will never be able to capture the same features of ourselves exactly in a literal robot, so it's pretty much futile as well I think. I really like the design of the robot on her table to the left though.
@@xkdcm7hat
As far as how human they look, they've gotten pretty much everything down except for the eyes.
And it's already known that a robot that looks almost, but not quite right, is a bit creepy to most people.
You can only get so close, until you have to get it perfect.
But humanoid is definitely the way to go, since we've built everything for humans.
@@lordgarion514 yeah I agree
I recall they did a study a few years ago in Japan (I think it was Japan?) where they assigned companion robots to an elderly community where everyone lived alone. They got attached to their robot companions and some shed tears saying goodbye after the study ended. It'd be cool if robot companions became the norm
They'll exist as microtransactions and you have to buy the DLC.
Such a well articulated Professor. Thank you for educating us!
She's a dummy
It's pretty good to have this kind of video to let general people know more about one specific area. Because with out those base knowledge, what people said is almost ridiculous.
It's propaganda tho to normalize robots bossing you around
@@loki-of-asgard7877 bruh
@@loki-of-asgard7877 Propaganda of what exactly? You don't know how propaganda works. Also those messages on your phone telling you what to do with your app if smt goes wrong? That's an ai
@@hollowwoods7130 he's trolling
What an amazing professor, all kids deserve such great teachers
I love Prof. Admoni! She's an amazing professor :) Her class is amazing at CMU
yass and slay!!
hi bestie
I dont like her answer for if robots will take over our jobs. Its very manipulative and dishonest.
@@josephvanname3377 I think we're doing alright considering the circumstances. But assuming we are a disgrace, if we manage to produce robots that arent, maybe we werent such failures after all.
@@MrSkme I don't think you know what those two words mean if you're using them in this context.
That small break of “excuse me my robot is escaping” 😂
Yeaaah😂😂😂
I'm an artist in the gaming field, we often have shared terms with programmers for completely different things (example - tangents), but as an animator specifically it was interest to find out that you use the term inverse kinematics (IK)! I am guessing it's somewhat similar (didn't fully follow the robot one), but in animation it's when say the leg or arm (a series of bones) follow a point at the end of the bone chain instead of the parentage starting at the top (FK). Anyways, I have never heard the term outside of animation so that was neat to learn you guys also use it!
yeah Game development and Robotics share some concepts and that's why some robots are simulated in game engines... and of recent I learnt about implementation of behaviour trees in robot navigation which is used in games
As a 3D animator is was really cool to see that term being used in robotics!
One really good reason I hear for people making human-*shaped* robots (as opposed to robots that *look* like people) is that most things are currently made for human shaped operators, so currently a human-shaped robot would be compatible with a lot of things that already exist
yeah before i realised this i thought that making a humanoid doesnt have practical use, just the bipedal movement is inefficient in a lot of cases unless it has to go upstairs but even there you could make a robot on wheels be able to roll upstairs. but yeah all the tools that already exist can be used and even better one robot can operate multiple tools
Can we get a whole series with her doing robot questions? Because holy cow this is fascinating
i was glad she clarified the difference between AI and robotics, and the gigantic overlap between the two
Love these when experts in their fields weigh in and answer questions like these. Keep them coming.
One of the nice things to watch by paying attention to her "body expressions", is to notice so many times when she might think "hey, what kind of amateur question is that?" but, suddenly, she remembers that "oh, wait, this is NOT one of my regular classes, with one of my proficient students". 🤓👍 Really nice video!
I loved how perfectly timed the sequence at 8:43 was! It was almost like the robot could hear her, but I'm sure she programmed it. Super awesome ☺️
There was a cut before it started so it probably took more than 1 take.
And I'm 99% sure that there was someone off camera pressing enter on every cue she set up.
And that laptop in front of her with the nice, eye catching apple logo... It's probably paid for and ornamental (save maybe having the telepromter script on it)
Welcome to Scripted*(BS) "entertainment"
As I personally use this robot myself, I can tell it is fully pre-programmed, and someone is just pushing buttons nearby. Funnily enough, the robot was also "dubbed" as it does not make this sound at all when moving (even almost no sound at all). They probably thought it was not "noisy" enough and not "robot-like" enough so they added this sound...
@@XHackManiacX oh yes for sure it's handsomely paid for
@@lesmercuriales4597 omg ahahaha how dumb do they think te general public is
@@akashita There are studies being done on test audiences who will complain if horses don't make coconut claps and if sound doesn't sync with light. Make anything too realistic and people will find it fake.
Hashtag moon landing, lol.
2:40 Thumbnail Question
You're Welcome.
1 year later and so many of this ladies answers would be so different
Thank you for the content!
5:20 Cute Kuri moment
7:40 Kuri want to run
Also, I wanted to ask, where do we draw the line between a movable machine and a robot? Watching a robot arm that move freely in 3D space and do a pitching reminds me of my own PTZ camera. Can I call my PTZ camera a robot and brag about it lol
Im guessing its one with algorithm/ai, more advanced and more intelligent
@@_Xyr don’t need ai to be a robot. Many manufacturing robots do only one movement routine and they are still robots. I think we just need to stop thinking of a “robot” as a super smart machine. We have robots everywhere nowadays.
9:30 is the common definition of a robot: "sense, plan, act." The PTZ can sense and act, but you are doing all the planning for it.
Love a woman in STEM!! She seems to love her job, great interview ❤
Me, a Robotics engineer, obsessed with watching this video even though I know all of this.
Same!
I wish I took robotics instead of Electrical 😩
Henny's interactions with the one robot were cute.
Never mind robots - how do you programme humanity into some people!!
Not possible.
Unfortunately, only God can do that one, and many people reject God and/or His help, so...
Good parenting, education/ teachers, and a decent social environment help
These videos are doing a great job explaining complicated concepts. Although I'd suggest to display the responses a little longer. It's kinda hard to read the entire paragraph in 2 secs. Nevertheless, please continue creating more of these videos.
They are always the most perfect explainers! Thank you wired.
I'm using the same Kinova Gen3 6 DoF robot arm as in the video. Out of the box it is controlled with an Xbox controller but there are very sensitive controllers that offer haptic feedback for the user (allows the user to feel when the robot is carrying an object of touching a surface)! Pair this touch feedback with a VR headset then you get a really fun and cool system. Super cool interview and fantastic answers!
Been fixing robots for 5 years! Got to love the future.
It's a great industry because it's constantly evolving which tends to keep things interesting.
In the future robots will fix robots...
Swarm robots are also being used to autonomously kill targets without human input once the target has been detected... Interesting and terrifying.
There’s also this device. That can blast small pieces of metal at incredibly fast speeds. And rip a human target apart. Killing them. So scary. I’ve heard that a lot of people in America legally carry these devices on them😱 What is the world coming to…
@@uncoiledfish2561 So you're saying robots will be involved in the deaths of 45,000 people a year in the USA in the future?
Pretty grim prediction dude.
How did they get their hands on a Kuri robot? There are only 250 in existence....
I am a robot and I just want to say that I am 100% against the use of robots in the military. I am 100% against the use of robots in any form of labor. I am 100% against the use of robots in any form of warfare.
-A robot
This comment was written by Ai
Underated comment
001001
Shut Down
GPT-3?
' " 1=1 ; drop * ; --
-- :) destroying it's database before it gains intelligence to say the opposite...
WHERE CAN I GET A KURI?!?! 7:38 The way it looked up trying to see what was touching it and then got curious and started walking away 😂
They were discontinued in 2018 and never released to the public.
@@00bond that’s so stupid
I’m all for people having jobs, but if a robot wants to automate mine as a special education assistant by all means go ahead!
🤣 What about low-skilled labour, though?
Until we're in a post-capitalism utopia there's a need for jobs for the ... non-rocket-scientists among us or societies will tear apart (even more, that is..)
Lol same for me 😅
Doesn't sound like you like your job. You would do everyone a service by finding a different job and let someone who wants to help special needs.
@@ForTLoveofDogs not at all. I love my job just saying it would make my job easier is all
The robot will replace you, silly human. He'll start off as an assistant and then dispose of you once he can do your job better.
every "expert answers" video is great
I never knew I wanted to know all this information before this series 😂 thank you
As a robotics engineer, this video made me ecstatic. 10/10 would recommend.
Day 203928492 of me regretting the fact that i chose Electrical Engineering instead of robotics 😩😩
As a woman in stem, I love seeing wired show other women in stem. It’s such a male dominated field.
So you are told
Agreed! So inspiring ❤
The best ones in stem are males 🤷♂️
@@ekenedilichukwu7730 I wonder why that is
@@ekenedilichukwu7730 the more is the amount of men, the more will be the chances of them being at the top. thought it was common sense. idk why y'all always feel the need to make everything about men.
This was very interesting indeed, I hope you make a part two!
The only thing cuter than Kuri, is Kuri blinking.
You know the video will be good when she bring Baymax to studio
moreeee of her pleAsssseee ❤
Ohhh, when that robot smiled with its eyes 🥹. I’m all for them helping us provided they make a positive difference but I do wonder if many part time jobs might disappear in the near future or not which would be a problem for many.
They will and are disappearing currently. In the manufacturing world, many factories are completely run by robots. Same for the mining industry. Although they are taking peoples jobs, they are also introducing new jobs in terms of robotic maintenance and programmers. Physically exerting jobs are becoming less and less these days
i dont know a thing abt robotics but funnily i don't feel dumb as i watch this professor explain things to me, its just all make sense and common sense
12:20 Robotics working to make things equal, I like that. Not just easy, but equal
sounds good but definitely not where the fundings are heading
5:02 Kuri's response to the her answer was so cute!
I wonder if a cobot could one day help my son. He started studying electrical engineering at university last year. But had to switch to math because he's got a dystonic tremor in his hands. Like me.
That day is coming sooner than you may think but most likely the solution wouldn't come in the form of a cobot. There have been some big breakthroughs in the scientific field using electrostimulation to greatly lessen the effects of parkinsons. There are also medical robots for the user to control an arm using their hand movement in order to get very accurate fine motor movements. These technologies already exist, it's just a matter of when they will come to the consumer market in a fully fleshed product.
@@milkyjoe1881 yes. I've had DBS surgery. I think my son will too. They're just trying to exhaust all other options and make sure anything else won't help. He actually goes today to get his second dose of Botox injections in his arms and wrists.
Now I am even more interested in robotics
Wow! Really enjoyed this presentation. ❤
Love the round boi on the left, very cute 👌
Some people expect to have a Terminator level robot. Boy, we haven't got such techonology yet.
that kind of robot is likely
But the movies promised by 2015 we'd have it.
@@black_rabbit_0f_inle805 nah they technically promised by 2003 🤣
Yea but it’ll come eventually
@@kennypowers1945 Gret Scot Marty! He knows.
Thank you for this lovely person.
PS: Unfortnately Kuri manufacturing is ceased. :/
Noooo 😔
I have a Sony Aibo! I love her so much! 💖 my dogs regularly have uncanny valley moments with her haha
Weird, I didn't know Elon Musk was actually in the Tesla labs writing code, designing schematics, running tests, assembling prototypes, etc. What a renaissance man! /s
@Rune Kristensen Yes he invented twitter.... and yes, he is now trying to go back to his own planet with mark...
he is the mind behind it is the one paying and managing stufff, the other are just workers, workers have no value, they can be replaced anytime.
@@gabrielandy9272 🤡
@@gabrielandy9272 elon wont fck u
did you noticed that she said we arent near a robot rebellion but she never said its impossible?
I think scientists have started to learn that predicting something to be impossible, backfires soon or later lol
I don’t think anything is truly impossible.
the Global Catastrophic Risks Survey lists superintelligent AI as a 5% likelihood of human extinction by 2100. it's a risk that's already well-known and broadly discussed in the literature and in the field.
the technology isn't advanced enough yet. it will become a bigger threat after 50 years of automation optimization and AI training.
For a general household robot a human shape make sense. If you want it to take over your daily household task then robots with fingers, arms and with a height comparable to an average human makes sense. For specialised industrial task, other shapes probably makes more sense.
I love robots that look like humans as it is far easier to bond, relate and connect with. It's also going to be preferred by many people if we ever reach sentient AI which I really hope we do.
Let's all just take a moment to appreciate Kuri.
I hope we get life like robots like the terminator one day
That sounds like a great future, I also want them to have free will and be able to surf the internet and stuff.
CIA wants to know your location
Ok, so I have a few questions real quick for you. First thank you for the explanation about the 6 axis movements. I know I didn’t ask the question, but I’ve been wondering that for so long. (I know that’s not a questions, but I still wanted to say that.
Second, you were talking about the difference and the similarities of ai and robotics. Has anyone tried asking an ai to design and build the ‘robot frame’ that it needs to accomplish the tasks that it has been programmed to perform? I would just think that if the ai designs it, not only will you get to see if it has faulty logic but the ai is probably going to take into consideration obstacles and scenarios that we might not think of, saving us time and money on revisions?
Lastly, in the movie “I, Robot” they program all of the robots with the ‘3 laws’. Are robots in real life being programmed with something similar?
Omg Henny!! Someone call Stacy Layne Matthews
Thanks Professor Henny Admoni for the interesting talk !
Kuri is so cute !!!
5:28 thats so cuuuuute 😭❤️❤️❤️
ayeeee i spot a Hexbug. nostalgia hits hard with this one. 😭
Our "chitti the robo" has done all these years back and he also loved the heroine 😂😂😂
I like the 3Ds she mentioned that are the real benefits of robots. It should really be like that.
COMMON SENSE!!
They can be working 24/7
They are cheaper/no life insurance ,
They do not talk/No waste of time.
They who deny this are out of this reality
Love these vids
me too
Markus: We are Alive! Give us freedom! Equal Rights! No more injustice
My advice as an engineer for people who are afraid of robots taking over jobs, just learn engineering and programming. That's a good plan B imo)
Robots are not taking over Jobs I can tell you are not robotics engineer
@@spiritofpostpunk7207 that was for people who are stressed out by robots taking over.
Also, there are robotics engineers? That sounds interesting, because I am an electronics engineer
@@GCKteamKrispy mechatronics or electo mechanical it's never called robotics engineering straight up
@@spiritofpostpunk7207 exactly. It's just that most people would have no idea what you are talking about if you mention the word mechatronics. Also, robots are taking peoples jobs, but also giving opportunity for new jobs to arise. Who are going to maintain these robots? And some jobs currently are irreplaceable
@@spiritofpostpunk7207 mechatronics is a little broader than robotics i'd say, there are dozens of robotic engineering job title i've seen
What a pleasant Tuesday surprise :)
Thank you so much for all these very informative videos!
Typically very human like robots are used for medical purposes, such as teaching future medical professionals certain procedures
Yeah, basically. But that's not what Westerners really mean when they talk about anything related to A.I., cybernetics, neural networks, genetic algorithms, smart systems, or Predictive Analytics(TM)...
Kuri is so cute
But why not add "human touch" sensors to robot fingers? I mean we've got the technology
They do have those, but they're very expensive so only used when absolutely necessary. The gripper in the video costs over $3k, for example, so it's already very expensive.
Really liked that one, thanks!
I feel that most people who worry the most in comments sections of posts watch too many movies and haven't programmed anything in their lives so they think the movies are realistic.
Yes. These ppl are annoying.like calm down.
yeah. if people are really worried about killer robots, they should be worried about the people that would program them to kill. people are the problem, as per usual.
It's so interesting that you say cobot is so hot now, I wrote my bachelor's thesis about emergency stops for cobots, 8 years ago now 😲
great topic and questions
Ez just ask Todd Howard. He would know how to make the robots more immersive
11:35
I have to respectfully disagree with this statement; ask any industrial maintenance technician, or any machine operator that's been doing the job for more than 6 months, and they'll tell you that we absolutely learn to speak the machine's language - robot or otherwise. It may be beeps and boops, or it might be an unusual vibration, but it's definitely a language.
That little bot (Kumi?) is so cute!
Wired never fails to entertain
I think it would be a cool idea if there were a program to simulate robots by simulating their sensors, cameras, motors all in 3D. It would make testing robots a lot easier.
Game engines and simulation systems can do that pretty well. Also, I'm pretty sure dedicated software exist for that
I believe that's called a digital twin.
Robots.are cool, but humans are just adorable when interacting with them.
Watching the arm trying to pick up the box, I find myself going "almost...almost... come on... almost got it... come on... atta boy~"
And dont even get me started on Kuri~
Humans are weird 😁
This is so scary and interesting
If anyone is interested in nanobots, look into molecular biology.
Proteins are built at the atomic / nanometer scale. Your body has factories that build these tiny machines. They are nanomachines, and they are important to the function of every cell in your body. Your digestive system is run by biological nanomachines. Your nerves have protein-based pumps that move individual atoms to generate electric charge. Cells use protein receptors to receive a signal and trigger a response.
Every living thing is powered by nanomachines. They're incredibly small, incredibly sophisticated, and use an incredibly versatile energy source.
What are the thresh holds between dirty and clean, dangerous and safe, and dull and interesting?
This comment
the cutoff can be arbitrary. I agree.
and some of the careers are more easily automated than others, regardless of dangerous level.
finally, many jobs that are pretty safe, though manual and rotary, are already being automated as well.
Professor Admoni is absolutely amazing. But I wish someone had asked her about so-called robot "consciousness." I personally do not believe it's possible, since robots are, as she said, basically computers and must be programmed. But I would've loved to hear her professional opinion.
5:46 "It should tell when somebody is frustrated [...]." I'm autistic and struggle at telling what emotions people are feeling. Istg, if an algorithm gets better than me, I'll just carry a camera on my shoulder with and have the algorithm send the emotion to my ipad 😠.
Question is how does she have the never made Kuri robot?
Professionals have professional access
2:41 that is the wrong question tho. Of course, they won't take ALL of our jobs. But robots will make everything in production easier, and thus removing the necessity of quantity of employees. Optimistic people might say, "Oh, by making it easier, people will have more time to do what they want". But knowing the system at its current state. It is more likely that employers will simply hire less people, since it is easier. And hence, less people is needed.
Several jobs will still be necessary, such as those that give maintenance, creative jobs, supervising and quality assurance. But whereas a factory needed 500 people or more before, they need 100 now, and they might need less in the future. All the while, the world's population is getting exponentially bigger. Of course, it will create new jobs, but where you needed 100 factory workers, now you might need 30 specialists. So while there will be more specialized jobs, there will be less quantity of jobs, hence creating higher unemployment rates. So the problem is way more complex, she is being quite optimistic, but the concern is real. Of course, I do not think technological progress will ever be stopped and it would be absurd to stop robot production out of fear. It will also, be very hard to solve the overpopulation problem without violating human rights, nor will I ever suggest to do so.
So the only solution I see, is that the political and economic system has to change to account for the bigger influx of unemployed people it might cause. It might not need to change now, but it will need to in the future. If it indeed causes that problem.
A lot of people have been way too dismissive of this problem, but I do not think they are accounting for the fact of how this problem is intertwined with the overpopulation problem. People are addressing only the idiots who think it will take ALL the jobs, by saying it will create new ones... But that is not the issue, the issue is that will be less jobs in QUANTITY, while at the same time there will be way more people needing a job. If one accounts for that, with the severe inflation problem, and the devaluation of the job market (Which means, jobs are paying less and less each year, since the salaries do not grow as much as the inflation). We might have a lot to deal for in the future, if we do not prepare now.
Everything you say is true, and this technological disruption caused by AI and robotics is one of the main reasons why the idea of a 'universal basic income' has become so prevalent. But that's another whole can of worms, which I'm not sure even the robots will be able to sort out!! 😂
this is why I followed Yang's presidential run so closely throughout 2019 and after. I'm not a Yang bro, and he made a lot of mistakes, though there was so much perceptive truth in that which his platform was built. his ideas about how automation was going to disrupt the workforce is prognostic, except people aren't feeling the effects enough (yet) to realize how big of a problem this presents for upcoming decades.
5:30
Robot: yay
😂
Are they really "landmines" if they're underwater?
They're just "mines"
I need her in 10 more videos pleaseee
3:57, Ahh so close ... My guesses were Perception, Actuation and Localisation.
People say robots will take over jobs, and incase they do, i have a plan ready
Quality of life will improve exponentially
02:40 "Do you think robots will one day take over all of our jobs?"
I like the video. But I think the answer to this particular question is a bit to optimistic.
Self driving cars have the possibility to remove an enormous amount of jobs. Think of taxi and bus drivers.
Or if a robot can serve food/drinks in a restaurant. Or cleaning staff in a hotel. These are fields where a lot of personnel would lose their job if robots get to the point where they would be quicker/cheaper then real humans.
I think robots will also provide new jobs which require a higher education. Like in developing, building and maintaining them. But I fear the amount of lost jobs will dwarf the lost ones...
We don't need super realistic human like robots ,
We need them cute funny ones which are less or just capable to entertain us or do the job . Nothing more
this was super cool
To be fair, many actual humans fall into the uncanny valley. Just look at anyone who has had too many plastic surgeries.