The Lord of the Rings The Fellowship of the Ring HDR vs SDR Comparison (HDR version)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 70

  • @creativeintent1790
    @creativeintent1790  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Lord of the Rings The Fellowship of the Ring HDR vs SDR Comparison (SDR version)
    th-cam.com/video/LkE5qKs9HJc/w-d-xo.html

  • @AsterionH
    @AsterionH 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just finished watching the entire 2020 version, and I have to say, it is my absolute favorite.

  • @overportfilms
    @overportfilms ปีที่แล้ว +36

    2010 blu ray is thee best for color

    • @elicortez446
      @elicortez446 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is the 2010 the extended or is it just theatrical? I have the 2012 blu rays for extended, but the colors look awful. And Max only has the 4K for extended. Does 2010 come in extended?

    • @overportfilms
      @overportfilms 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@elicortez446 Not sure.

    • @Grayson-Rosen
      @Grayson-Rosen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@elicortez446 2010 is j theatrical. The 2011 Extended blu rays were the ones to add the color grading. Also I believe its limited to extended because my 2012 theatrical blu ray does not have the blue/greenish tint. The newer remastered extended blu ray has a better color grading but im not too sure how good it rlly is

    • @Manco654
      @Manco654 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Sadly just the theatrical cut, though fans have tried to transfer the color grade onto the extended cut. You may want to watch a recent video called sth. like: Can The Lord of the Rings ever be remastered?

  • @hiattgrey9161
    @hiattgrey9161 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    2010 blu-ray is the best.

  • @thelastdefenderofcamelot5623
    @thelastdefenderofcamelot5623 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    It's truly disappointing. The 4K is just recoloring over the 2012 green tint Blu-ray. It is not a new scan. It's not the same when you add another layer of red or blue tint to counter it.

  • @markdavies7776
    @markdavies7776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I'm perfectly happy sticking to my Extended DVD version for now :)

  • @1wibble230
    @1wibble230 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Those 2010 Blu-Ray versions must be like gold dust. As for the 2012 ones... good lord they screwed up

  • @E9oK9kMaV
    @E9oK9kMaV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    so happy i got the original extended on dvd. wish they gave us a 2010 version of the extended on bluray though. not a fan of 2020 version, but at least they tried to fix it a little. the 2012 is awful and kind of mad at myself for buying it back in the day.

  • @ShadowMan64572
    @ShadowMan64572 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    4K release looks so BLAND and non-vibrant with colors. I mean, these aren't the most light hearted whimsical of fantasy movies, but they're certainly not documentaries of New Zealand that need realistic colors. Those original colors were fine.

    • @DanHall64
      @DanHall64 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are watching this on a HDR monitor, aren't you? TH-cam should say "HDR" in the bottom corner instead of "HD"

    • @jamesrobertson9697
      @jamesrobertson9697 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Great way of putting it. The original colour filters helped set the scene. The new natural ones may be better for HDR I guess, but it pulls you out of the fantasy.

    • @jamesrobertson9697
      @jamesrobertson9697 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DanHall64 I'm watching with HDR on, and it does look bland. Needs the original filters back.

    • @Aaron-od9ul
      @Aaron-od9ul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you've seen this movie in a theater recently (which used the 4K remaster) you'd be saying otherwise. I've never seen the movie look as good as it did there. That being said, after doing some research, I will be getting the 2010 Blu-ray, since it's so nostalgic, but also doesn't have the green tint.

  • @BrunoImcomp
    @BrunoImcomp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Should have added remastered Bluray versionthat came after 4k hdr

  • @olliecl979
    @olliecl979 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Can someone explain why no one EVER mentions the Blu ray extended version REMASTERED ??
    Is it even real ??
    I keep seeing ads to buy this exact version but somehow can't get a review anywhere. It seems to be a recent release and it is definitely not the 4K UHD version.
    If someone out there has seen it, how does it compare to the classic blu-ray and the 4K UHD versions ?

    • @EdouardPicard0224
      @EdouardPicard0224 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes it does exist, it has the same changes of the 4k remaster, but wether it looks better than the 2012 blu ray is a matter of preference, i heard the audio balance was better on the remastered version, and contrast was better. I personally prefer the color correction of the remaster

    • @quantessenz
      @quantessenz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because the film grain cleaning is poor and has many artefacts and looks weird in movement of faces etc.

    • @datubeda
      @datubeda ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I know this comment is 6 months old. For what it's worth, I just received this version and will be returning it. For some reason, the DVD's actually sound significantly better on my surround sound than this version. Based on the screen grabs in this video, I'll either keep what I have or look for the 2010 Blu-Ray. The infamous green tint in the 2012 is pretty noticeable here, and I don't think I prefer the 4K color grades vs the older versions.

    • @luckyrockmore2796
      @luckyrockmore2796 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it's the 20th anniversary edition Blu ray. It has the enhanced Dolby Atmos track included similar to the 4k release

    • @maximiliancordedda
      @maximiliancordedda หลายเดือนก่อน

      And is it worth it. Are you talking about the lotr and hobbit extend 30 discs bluray set? @@datubeda

  • @Gioxtream
    @Gioxtream 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    La version HDR 2020 para mi es la mejor. Miremos el minuto 3:23. Alli apreciamos el cielo de un color excelente.

    • @naggatv6440
      @naggatv6440 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I prefer the old version, it seems to take place before sunset, I find it better

  • @naggatv6440
    @naggatv6440 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    2010 best It kept the charm of the original and improved it. The 2012 is worse, the 2022 is ok, but the calibration that gives the charm and the fantastic side is no longer the

  • @vih-rose
    @vih-rose 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2010 it's the best and i think sdr works better for this old movies than hdr, the 4k version tries to "modernize" them trying to make them look like they have a more digital touch like the hobbit, I don't really know how to explain it.

  • @Eva01-jy2qu7pu9r
    @Eva01-jy2qu7pu9r 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    It seems like the DVD still remains the best version thats been released on home video. The 2010 Blu Ray was clearly a 1080p upscale of the DVD, and the 2012 Blu Ray and 4K releases look awful

    • @thelastdefenderofcamelot5623
      @thelastdefenderofcamelot5623 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The 2012 one is from the extended version of The Fellowship of the Ring. All the extended version of FOTR Blu-ray have this disastrous green tint. Only the first movie. The other two extended Blu-ray sequels have a bit of color tinkering but not as obvious. What they did for the 4K was instead of rescanning a new transfer, they recolored it back to the 2010 look probably by adding a red tint and this is as close as it can get. It's not the same. The DVD's fortunately can still be viewed in it's original colors.

    • @Aaron-od9ul
      @Aaron-od9ul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The 2010 Blu-ray is just a Blu-ray made from the old, 2K-ish video master. The DVD is just a lower res copy of said master and is in no way better then the 2010 Blu-ray. I've seen this movie countless times and I must say, when the 4K version was shown in theaters in 2023, it looked amazing. Looking at comparisons on a non-HDR screen can be useful but it will only get you so far when it comes to knowing what the movie actually looks like when shown in HDR and on the big screen.
      That being said, I'm going to find the 2010 steelbook, for nostalgia reasons. :)

  • @sanji663
    @sanji663 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2010 is the best version

  • @blondmop92
    @blondmop92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    How does the 4K at 3:00 look so bad compared to the others?

    • @MegaIkedog
      @MegaIkedog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It looks a lot darker, and almost washed out. One of the reason I hate 4K UHD discs over Blu-rays is that they are so much darker. It drives me nuts.

    • @dr.insaneoiv
      @dr.insaneoiv ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@MegaIkedog With a hint of Noise Reduction to boot.

    • @yellowlinks
      @yellowlinks ปีที่แล้ว

      its because it's designed for much brighter tvs! it doesnt look blad then displayed on a 1000 nit oled screen

    • @Jumpman67
      @Jumpman67 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think you're confusing "bad" with accurate. The other three versions are over saturated.

    • @ooooswain
      @ooooswain ปีที่แล้ว

      It's likely because the youtube video isn't in HDR but the 4k disc is.

  • @TheChosen2030
    @TheChosen2030 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Problem of 4k is , it just makes the image too bright

    • @ToldYouSo18
      @ToldYouSo18 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes it does.. in my opinion it takes a way a part of the fantasy.
      You remember that scene where Argorn is dead? In an old version it had a blueish tint.. in the new 4k version its to white.

  • @Howtoman126
    @Howtoman126 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does the 2011 Blu ray extended edition box setversion have the ugly colors or the original colors?

    • @JimElford
      @JimElford 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ugly

  • @TheDbduece
    @TheDbduece 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don't know about you but I find the 2002 DVD holding things down quite well......

  • @benbrennan5233
    @benbrennan5233 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why would any of the blu-ray be in SDR?

    • @Jumpman67
      @Jumpman67 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      SDR stands for standard dynamic range. That's usually what all non UHD blu-rays come in.

    • @1wibble230
      @1wibble230 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you're confusing SDR/HDR with SD and HD. The former refers to dynamic range, the latter refers to resolution. All the Blu-rays are HD or above.

  • @ad61video
    @ad61video หลายเดือนก่อน

    2010 bluray may be the way i like the colors sentimentally, but when i play the 4k version with the cinema setting on my tv (as one always should with movies) and increase tv saturation by turning the color up from 40 to 50 percent the colors look good and warm. In many ways the 4k is superior because of Dolby Vision HDR and Atmos for sound.

  • @kasperschmidt5665
    @kasperschmidt5665 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have to go with the DVD.

    • @michaelhawkins7389
      @michaelhawkins7389 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why ? Blu ray and 4k are better quality

    • @bleack8701
      @bleack8701 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      the 2010 version is identical

    • @michaelhawkins7389
      @michaelhawkins7389 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bleack8701 to what? 2010 blu ray verison is not the same as dvd ....

    • @nickFieldUK
      @nickFieldUK 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Should've gone to Specsavers.

  • @kylewinters8531
    @kylewinters8531 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:52 Gandalf looks soooo dark on my hdr, almost no shadow under his hat. Just downloaded and this is the moment I understood I HATE HDR. Right now I downloaded both FullHD SDR and 4K HDR variant. SDR looks so much better. My monitor supports HDR10 but still it looks artificial. It's a shame I cant' watch LOTR in 4k with SDR

    • @visions1818
      @visions1818 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      HDR is amazing, blame your screen not the technology. It looks stunning on a good hdr panel

  • @Aaron-od9ul
    @Aaron-od9ul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They COULD have simply up-scaled the crisp, detailed, filmic 2K master and NOT have applied DNR and sharpening and instead only make the color corrections to not have it be all geen, but no....

  • @panzernecro7729
    @panzernecro7729 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Witch version is on Prime Vidéo ?

    • @olliecl979
      @olliecl979 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      looks like the DVD version theatrical cut

  • @marekkos3513
    @marekkos3513 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just stick with the 2010 Theatrical version

  • @dv96_dk
    @dv96_dk ปีที่แล้ว

    Was there a blue Ray version in 2010 and 2012?

    • @d228110
      @d228110 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      2010 => theatrical version; 2012 => extended edition

  • @Paramurasaki
    @Paramurasaki 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    None of them are good, honestly :D but I like the video hahaha

  • @sandman8920
    @sandman8920 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I prefer vhs.

  • @kylewinters8531
    @kylewinters8531 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    2002 DVD SDR was the best

  • @eisaalshamsi2998
    @eisaalshamsi2998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Game of throuns please next

  • @ooooswain
    @ooooswain ปีที่แล้ว +3

    4k > 2010 blu ray > dvd > 2012 blu ray

  • @davidkulmaczewski4911
    @davidkulmaczewski4911 ปีที่แล้ว

    Slow and repetitive, made it tough to follow the plot. Also the subtitles confuses me... maybe they were in spanish by mistake, lol. Loved the soundtrack, very suspenseful. 7/10.