Interesting. In the end, was the suggestion that social media companies should try adding a feature that prompts users to consider the accuracy of something they share before they share it? The SM companies would obviously never do anything that might jeopardize engagement without being compelled to by law. If SM requires people to think just a little bit longer before posting something or otherwise primes people to think more critically on the platform, could it make a dent in the spread of misinformation?
The World Health Organization has become extraordinarily conflicted, primarily through its funding, and by serving corporate masters, it fails miserably at promoting global health The WHO will form the foundation for a one world government, under the auspice of coordinating and ensuring global biosecurity. This becomes evident when you review the proposed amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) and the WHO Pandemic Treaty The proposed IHR amendments will erase the concepts of human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms from the equation. The first principle in Article 3 of the 2005 IHR states that health regulations shall be implemented “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.” The amendment strikes that sentence Instead, international health regulations will be based on “principles of equity, inclusivity and coherence” only. This means they can force you to undergo whatever medical intervention they deem to be in the best interest of the collective The IHR amendments grant dictatorial powers to the WHO director-general and unelected regional directors. The WHO’s “recommendations” will be legally binding by all member states, and will supersede all national and state laws, including the U.S. Constitution
Is this true? I’d doubt if governments followed the IHR given its controversial nature as you pointed out. Fact checking in progress (as the video suggested 😇)
There are some people who are spreading wrong info about it fake posts and comments and , and they also making it look like i am taking something from them , and a charity organisation donated somerhing on my name , i never did anything of that sort as I am in a tight spot myself right now . This is wrong and is affecting me.
Instead of just addressing the topic of disinformation and misinformation you fail when you add content matters that can be placed under these evaluations ae: “5G,corona virus,ect.,by default your subjective and not objective,you are pre ordaining these topics as conclusive,be the topic more like a definition base,leave current events out.
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Interesting. In the end, was the suggestion that social media companies should try adding a feature that prompts users to consider the accuracy of something they share before they share it? The SM companies would obviously never do anything that might jeopardize engagement without being compelled to by law. If SM requires people to think just a little bit longer before posting something or otherwise primes people to think more critically on the platform, could it make a dent in the spread of misinformation?
Also, it would be a violation of free speech.
@@zfloyd1627Is it? I don't think thinking before speaking is really a bad thing.
in the name lf free speech, all your kid does is abuse and spread bogus. @@zfloyd1627
@@zfloyd1627
Suggesting that people consider their words before posting would definitely not be a violation of anything.
@@droppindeuces2560What an unbelievable embarrassing admission of a lack of critical thinking.
Yes for searching...🫣
The World Health Organization has become extraordinarily conflicted, primarily through its funding, and by serving corporate masters, it fails miserably at promoting global health
The WHO will form the foundation for a one world government, under the auspice of coordinating and ensuring global biosecurity. This becomes evident when you review the proposed amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) and the WHO Pandemic Treaty
The proposed IHR amendments will erase the concepts of human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms from the equation. The first principle in Article 3 of the 2005 IHR states that health regulations shall be implemented “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.” The amendment strikes that sentence
Instead, international health regulations will be based on “principles of equity, inclusivity and coherence” only. This means they can force you to undergo whatever medical intervention they deem to be in the best interest of the collective
The IHR amendments grant dictatorial powers to the WHO director-general and unelected regional directors. The WHO’s “recommendations” will be legally binding by all member states, and will supersede all national and state laws, including the U.S. Constitution
Is this true? I’d doubt if governments followed the IHR given its controversial nature as you pointed out. Fact checking in progress (as the video suggested 😇)
There are some people who are spreading wrong info about it fake posts and comments and , and they also making it look like i am taking something from them , and a charity organisation donated somerhing on my name , i never did anything of that sort as I am in a tight spot myself right now . This is wrong and is affecting me.
The name of the charity organization is milaap.
Bless your bliss
Yeah , about 2000 years late.
Or maybe 10,000.
What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities?
Too late for winning the misinformation problem.
Instead of just addressing the topic of disinformation and misinformation you fail when you add content matters that can be placed under these evaluations ae: “5G,corona virus,ect.,by default your subjective and not objective,you are pre ordaining these topics as conclusive,be the topic more like a definition base,leave current events out.
Because 5g has been proven by 3rd parties and verified that its not radioactive or bad for you