Did the 12 Find Paul Was A False Apostle? Did Pauline Christians alter Ambrose to delete the reason?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.พ. 2023
- The work of Ambrose(iaster) from 360-370 in his Commentary on 1 Corinthians 9:2 reads:
1 Cor. 9:2 "Although I am not an apostle to others, yet I am to you;"
"Because by the Jews who believed, and nevertheless kept the law, he was denied to be an apostle. For he was already teaching that the circumcised [sic: sion] should not be observed, nor should the Sabbath be kept; but to the rest of the apostles, who, because of the scandal, concealed [or hid] themselves from this matter, he seemed to teach differently; therefore the Apostle [i.e., Paul] was denied by them; for to these [i.e., the Corinthians], he was an apostle for from him they had seen him signs of virtue." ‘For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord;’ [says Paul] for by preaching this, they were converted from idols to the faith of the one God." [Translation from Latin]
Patrologiae. Ambrosius, Sancti Ambrosii, Opera Omni (Paris, Garnier / J.-P. Migne, 1879) Vol. 17 p. 369-70
The books.google.com to read this in Latin is here:
www.google.co.uk/books/editio...
Alternatively, you can go to this url:
www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu...
Then look for chapter 9 (Caput IX) and then go to verse 2 to see it. It says page 241 and 242 on top.
The verbatim Latin is:
(Vers. 11.) Cum autem venisset Petrus Antiochiam, in faciem illi restiti; quia reprehensus erat.
Post concordiam societatis, et honorificentiam primatus, quam sibi invicem per gratiam Dei detulerunt;
nunc interveniente causa negligentiæ vel erroris,
dissidere inter se videntur apostoli, non in propria
causa, sed in sollicitudine Ecclesiæ. In faciem,
inquit, illi restiti. Quid est hoc, nisi in præsentia
ei contradixi? Et qua causa subjunxit dicens :
Quia reprehensus erat? • Reprehensibilis utique
ab evangelica veritate, cui hoc factum adversabatur. Nam quis eorum auderet Petro primo apostolo, cui claves regni coelorum Dominus dedit, resistere ;
nisi alius talis, qui fiducia electionis suæ sciens se
non imparem, constanter improbaret, quod ille sine
consilio fecerat.
The following quote is not in this video, but Galatians commentary explains the "scandal"
"But when Peter came to Antioch, I stood up to him; because he had been rebuked." This is my translation from Latin:
"After the concord of society, and the honor of the primacy, which they conveyed to each other through the grace of God; now intervening because of negligence or error, the apostles seem to differ among themselves, not in their own way but for the cause of the care of the Church. In [his] face he [Paul] said, "I stopped him." "What is this, except in the present who I contradicted him?" And for what reason he added, saying: "Because he was caught? Of course reprehensible from evangelical truth, to which this act was opposed. For who of them would dare to resist Peter, the first apostle, to whom the Lord gave the keys of the kingdom of heaven except such another [i.e., Paul], who knowing himself to trust in his own choice [would not be] the odd one out [and thus] he [Paul] would constantly disapprove of what was not made according to his own plan."
You will find the Latin at this Url:books.googleusercontent.com/b...
Go to page 188 of PDF that shows. Go to verse11, and use this text to translate with.
For whatever reason, Mr. Bray in 2 books does not have the quote matching the Latin version that is in Patrialogie.
![เกิดใหม่ทั้งทีก็เป็นสไลม์ไปซะแล้ว ซีซั่น 3 - ตอนที่ 52 [ซับไทย]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZLgYjtGQpbc/mqdefault.jpg)
The Bible and Christian history are both equally complicated. We accept what we are told and are encouraged not to think too much. If we question anything we are accused of heresy.
Its amazing how they twist the story by slandering Peter as arrogant for not eating with the Gentiles when in reality it was not his refusal to eat "with them" but rather his abstaining from eating meat sacrificed in the name of false idols which Paul had no issue doing.
Bottom line, when someone wants to find excuses for sin they find it in Paul or chosen verses that will give license for sin. Deut13:3, Prov25:2 God tests us to see who we will follow
The fact none of the 12 wrote that Paul was an Apostle is very important. They didn't find him part of their cloth.
Thank you for all your work Doug!
I appreciate you!
Passover is coming up... And as of last night, the fellowship that I associate with has denied me the privilege of attending their 7 day Passover celebration.... Due to the fact that I'm questioning and testing the words and epistles of Paul. Very sad!!
They made this decision even after I adamantly told them that I believed every word from our Messiah and The Most High!!
Apparently that was not enough for them... Now I'm banned.... shunned and unwelcome.
It goes to show that they place Paul above Yahshua and Yahweh. Very unfortunate!!
Blessings to you my friend! Please keep up the good work!
HI Sariah. I did a video just for you, if you wish to use it (not pressure), to share with the fellowship that banned you. I try to lovingly and kindly but persuasively show they are violating the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares. I also provide other proofs. Here is the direct URL - th-cam.com/video/GcsalMtslvU/w-d-xo.html
If you are a subscriber, you will see it come up.
Blessings Doug
Thank you so much!!! I truly appreciate all of your time and effort!!! I watched the video and I agree wholeheartedly!!! You did a very nice job!!
I went ahead and posted it directly to my Facebook page and I sent it directly to the head person of the fellowship...
We'll see how it goes...
Thank you again Doug!!
@@sariahamor198 that was very nice of Doug to put that together for you! I’m sorry you are having to go through that pain for standing on the truth and warning of this deception of Paul.
I can empathize with how much it stings to be shunned from your fellowship for speaking the truth. To be rejected by those you love and trusted can feel worse than if stabbed by a complete stranger.
When I went through something similar, I heard over and over in my spirit “Count it all joy…Count it ALL JOY!” It took a little while to get over but looking back now, I rejoice that I was able to endure that pain for the sake of His Kingdom and come out stronger. You will, too, and it seems like you are already.
He reminded me then that He is training His warriors to fight the coming giants that everyone will fear. And what better training than to begin now fighting a “Giant” (like the teachings of Paul) that everyone loves? So Count it ALL JOY! Be blessed, Sister! ❤️
@@cdjheaven thank you so much for your words of encouragement!! I have been feeling down and somewhat lost.....I needed your message!! Thank you!!
Blessings and shalom!!
HI Sariah. Please email me, if you have not resolved the issues, to let me know what to pray over at this point.
jesuswordsonlystudies@gmail.com
Love the clementine homilies btw. Peter brings so much clarification on the Truth.
Stanford's website says that they participate in interlibrary lending, so you should be able to get the book that you are interested through your local library. If not, the Stanford librarian might scan a specific page is you request it.
Thankyou, I will have to reactivate my university library card. and see if can be done. or the phone call might be best idea.
4:40
🔥The Abrahamic, The Mosaic🔥 Covenants of GOD mentioned
AS being the Doctrine & Gospel
of the 12 Apostles! It's right there!
《 The 🔥 Way! 》
Paul taught different OBVIOUSLY!
❣️ HalleluYHWH ❣️
When the 12 apostles judge the tribes will it be Matthias the chosen apostle or Paul the self proclaimed apostle in number 12?
Hi Harry. Obvoiusly not a "self-proclaimed" apostle such as Paul. No, it necessarily will be Matthias.
Blessings Doug
Well done! The proof was always right there, but like I tell others, Paul is a test of discernment. Only those seeking truth will see the truth.
Deuteronomy 18:18-22 GNTD
[18] I will send them a prophet like you from among their own people; I will tell him what to say, and he will tell the people everything I command.
[19] He will speak in my name, and I will punish anyone who refuses to obey him.
[20] But if any prophet dares to speak a message in my name when I did not command him to do so, he must die for it, and so must any prophet who speaks in the name of other gods.’
[21] “You may wonder how you can tell when a prophet's message does not come from Yahuah.
[22] If a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord and what he says does not come true, then it is not the Yahuah's message.
That prophet has spoken on his own authority, and you are not to fear him.
Matthew 7:15-20 GNTD
[15] “Be on your guard against false prophets; they come to you looking like sheep on the outside, but on the inside they are really like wild wolves.
[16] You will know them by what they do. Thorn bushes do not bear grapes, and briers do not bear figs.
[17] A healthy tree bears good fruit, but a poor tree bears bad fruit.
[18] A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a poor tree cannot bear good fruit.
[19] And any tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown in the fire.
[20] So then, you will know the false prophets by what they do.
👉🏾Nail in Paul's Coffin 👉🏾Exodus 23:7 GNTD
[7] Do not make false accusations, and do not put an innocent person to death, for I will condemn anyone who does such an evil thing.
[7] “Keep yourself far from a false matter, and do not kill the innocent and the righteous, for I do not declare the wrong right.
Remember Saul/Paul showed up on the scene associated with the high priest and Pharacees when they confronted and murdered the Apostles assistant Stephen (Acts 7, 8 & 9). It says very clearly that he consented to the death of an innocent man regarding a matter that had NOTHING to do with him.
And God says very clearly in his law that he does not justify anyone who would do such a thing. Yahushua seconds this notion when he says a bad tree does not bear good fruit. Paul shows up as a wicked man, do you really think he changed to do Gods will? Or did he disguise himself as a sheep in order to ravage as a wolf from the inside.
Truth!
Hi Illcap. You made me see something I cannot believe never crossed my mind. Paul's participation in killing Stephen, and not having repented prior to Jesus' alleged appearance corroborates this is not the true Jesus. "For I do not declare the wrong right." Exodus 23:7 - as you point out.
Amazing - it never ends!!!
Blessings Doug
@@jesuswordsonly Something else to consider. Yahushua clearly told the Disciples not to believe anyone with Paul's story:
Matthew 24:4-5 GNTD
[4] Jesus answered, “Watch out, and do not let anyone fool you.
[5] Many men, claiming to speak for me, will come and say, ‘I am the Messiah!’ and they will fool many people.
[11] “And many false prophets shall rise up and lead many astray.
[23] “If anyone then says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or ‘There!’ do not believe.
[24] “For false messiahs and false prophets shall arise, and they shall show great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the chosen ones.
[25] “See, I have forewarned you.
[26] “So if they say to you, ‘Look, He is in the desert!’ do not go out; or ‘Look, He is in the inner rooms!’ do not believe.
[27] For as the lightning comes from the east and shines to the west, so also shall the coming of the Son of Aḏam be.
Paul claims he saw Jesus in the desert enroute to Damascus, and that Jesus taught him through visions in a private room. All a lie. Yahushua (Jesus) told the last people he spoke to on earth, the disciples, that NO ONE would see him until EVERYONE saw him returning.
Hi Illacap. I found that in 2011, and published the first article on it at this url:
www.jesuswordsonly.org/topicindex/292-jesus-prophecy-about-who-identified-himself-as-jesus-to-paul.html
Here is the video explaining how Mormons unwittingly tipped me off to it:
studio.th-cam.com/users/videoJI7pSBMlwdA/edit
They said there was something in Matt 24 that Christians will never use against Joseph Smith, but they did not say what they meant by that. I studied it over and over and still missed it. Until one day -- the light went off! boom.
Here are 25 video I have made on the topic on this channel. They are all different in some way as the issues can go deep in many different ways:
airtable.com/appnhjlL9bIfzujjC/shrLZ9zmR6R5aseF1
Blessings Doug
@@jesuswordsonly hallelujah for the TRUTH. May YAHUAH bless you for your work and efforts in bringing this out to those who seek understanding.
Pauls Epistles were left in the bible to show opposition to the 12 apostles and prove what Yeshua was saying about the Pharisees. Which becomes apparent reading other books like "Jude" and "Revelation."
After Rome was nearly destroyed unto death but yet did live it adopted Paul's epistles as the new Christian Theology and became the most popular belief in the world (Rev 13:3)
However, people should not throw out the resurrection with Paul. Even in the book of Revelation which calls Paul a false apostle in Rev 2:2 it also says Yeshua was resurrected Rev 1:18
Some really out thete strange folks commenting here. Didn't realize they had such a cult like this
Earl White. Welcome to my world of obscenely pro-Paul people who are anti-the-teachings of Jesus' who claim to "rightly divide" the word of God in 2 - Paul is valid; but Jesus was rejected by Jews and hence his kingdom never supposedly came, and His words mean nothing at all except maybe operate in a future milennial kingdom.
Blessings Doug
Great points, once again. I have read the Clementine Homilies but obviously the corrupted version as Simon Magnus is mentioned in place of Paul. Is there anywhere one can find an English version of the original Homilies?
not the true ones. Rufunis was thorough. some think the Aramaic homilies is less corrupt but in my reading I don’t see any. one has to read with a very discerning eye.
You're the best detective
I also recommend my works which expose Paul as a fraud.
Hi brother 😊...I have been learning so much and I'll like to ask in regards to the hebrew manuscript can they be trusted?
Hi Princel. I would say the masoretic has embarrassingly been proven to modify Isiah 53 to omit after the suffering servant is killed - a man of sorrows (not Israel) -- that it deleted he will “see light again”” - the sun on earth and hence resurrection. we only know this from the near complete 7 copies of Isaiah found in the Dead Sea scrolls,
I found many similar corruptions.
we don’t have Dead Sea scroll survive covering deut 49:27 unfortunate.
However we know the 12 patriarchs was a pre Christian work, and the Jews record show it says divide the spoils, but the Christian’s thus felt obliged to corrupt our understanding byBenjamin declaring he would be one day known as one who gave food to the gentiles… an obvious corruption by our team.
hence that is why I mentioned the encyclopedia of Judaism on the original 12 patriarchs was true to the Bible.
also it appears that suddenly by the 400s all mention of gen 49 was a prophecy positively about paul all disappear. not one voice. this means that Origen who in the 200s was engaged in translating Hebrew Bible through symmacbus and theodotion in his hexapla cleared up the Septuagint error in their 200 ad corrections in their Greek translations, and this killed imagining deut 49:27 was a positive about paul. I surmise this from the utter dropping of 49:27 in pro paul camp.
blessings doug
Thanks again ♥️
@@princelolowu7726 Hebrew Masoretic Text was written several centuries after Jesus Christ. I recommend Aramaic Old Testament (known as Aramaic Peshitta Tanakh) and Aramaic New Testament (known as Aramaic Eastern Peshitta). Aramaic was the language of first century Israel (Acts 1 verse 19).
I also recommend my works which expose Paul as a fraud.
I know I said this before, but I do not believe Peter was at Antioch during the time Paul is talking about. based on time line from Acts and Paul's travels. In Acts peter did not back down to the Jews at Jerusalem so why would anyone think Peter did that at Antioch.
I agree. it appears that at this point the 12 determined Paul a false apostle, as Ambross(iaster) says at this point a scandal broke out, and the 12 “hid” themselves - implying 12 excluded Paul from leadership role, i.e., preaching with any commendation letter - a necessary procedure used by religious groups who has a member go off reservation.
blessings doug
Excellent point. I had kind of wondered about this. I don't know the timeline, but I do know that Galatians was one of Paul's first letters, so it didn't seem likely to me. But the story just seems fishy anyway. It sounds like the common macho bragadocio boasts of a super male egotist.
Around the 33 minute mark: 2nd Peter was not written by Peter. So we actually do not have any record of Peter ever accepting Paul. Said another way, Peter never said, "And count lthe patience of our Lord as salvation, just as mour beloved brother Paul also wrote to you naccording to the wisdom given him, 16 as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, pas they do the other Scriptures." That is, unless he said it from his grave, which is when 2nd Peter was written. Since 2nd Peter is not written by Petter, it is written by a Paul believer, who is obviously trying to make it look like Peter approved of Paul. The same people who would argue that the Clementine Homolies have no validity because they were not written by Peter, can in no Way use 2 Peter 3:15-16, because it also was not written by Peter. Both The Clementines and 2 Peter are still valuable because they do expose how certain factions thought about their teachers. The only instace we have in the "Fake Testament" of how Peter and James may have felt about Paul at one time is in the book of Acts. It does at least imply that they knew of Paul's teachings that seemed to be contrary to the law. And we do get an indication that Paul in Luke's telling does not arrogantly do what ever he wants to do as he boasts about in Galations. It shows that he did what James told him to do. Sadly, it is hard to follow much of Acts, because it is clear that Luke is pro-Paul, even when he gets some things right. It is interesting that he writes over 3/4 of the book of Acts about Paul, and only talks about Peter and James and other Apostle's picke by Jesus, sparingly. The "Acts of the Apostle's is a huge minsnomer. It should be called the Acts's of Paul and his Followers.
Jesus told us we will never died on earth
Heres what God showed me..
JESUS NEVER SAID THE WORD GRACE. NOT ONE TIME!! part 1: the false apostle-Paul
(All information from Bible, Google, Wikipedia, and various, articles.)
BOAST:
Jesus says BOAST:
Matt. 5.16
"LET YOUR LIGHT SO SHINE BEFORE MEN, THAT THEY MAY SEE YOUR GOOD WORKS and GLORIFY your Father which is in heaven.
John 3.21
"BUT HE THAT DOETH TRUTH COMETH TO THE LIGHT, THAT HIS DEEDS MAY BE MADE MANIFEST, that they are wrought in God."
(He says, ''you are the light of the world''...
Jesus wants us to Take "that light," {you} and shine it in such a way that attract people's attention so they can GLORIFY God.
That is Jesus' own words.
Matt. 5.13-16
13. "Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men."
14. "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
15. "Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
16. "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good WORKS, and glorify your Father which is in heaven."
Jesus says we shouldn't hide the light, but put it where all can see it.
WORKS:
Jesus Says,
"WORKS" are the only
thing you are "judged"
and"rewarded" by.
Matt. 16.24-27
24. "Then Jesus said to His disciples, 'If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.
25. "For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.
26. "For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?
27. "For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his WORKS.'"
-
John 3.21
"But whoever lives
by the truth comes
into the light, so that
it may be seen plainly
that what they have
done has been done
in the sight of God."
John 8.39
“They answered and said unto him, 'Abraham is our father.' Jesus saith unto them, 'If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the WORKS of Abraham.'"
John 14.12 study(chps) 14-15
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the WORKS that I do shall he do also; and greater WORKS than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father."
Jesus says even now tha he's gone we will do even greater works then we've been doing.
Heb. 6.10
"For God is not
unrighteous to forget
YOUR WORK and
LABOUR of love,
WHICH YE HAVE SHOWED toward his name,
IN THAT YE HAVE
MINISTERED TO
THE SAINTS AND
DO MINISTER."
(this sums it up
entirely and perfectly...
We must DO WORKS...
SHOW OUR WORKS...
And those WORKS are "Teaching" and "Keeping"
The 10 commandments {ministering to the saints})
Rev. 14.12-13
12. "Here is the patience of the saints: here are THEY THAT KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD, and the faith of Jesus.
13. "And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may REST from their LABOURS;
and THEIR WORKS
DO FOLLOW THEM."
Rev. 20.12-13
12. "And I saw the
dead, small and great,
stand before God;
and the books were
opened: and another
book was opened,
which is the book of
life: AND THE DEAD WERE JUDGED OUT OF THOSE THINGS WHICH WERE
WRITTEN IN THE BOOKS,
• ACCORDING TO THEIR WORKS.•
13 "And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: AND THEY WERE JUDGED L, EVERY MAN
•ACCORDING TO THEIR WORKS ."•
(No mention of
"FAITH" or "GRACE")
Rev. 22.12-14
12. "And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward
is with me, to give
every man according
as his WORK shall be.
13. "I am Alpha and
Omega, the beginning
and the end, the first
and the last.
14. "Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city."
(No mention of
"FAITH" or "GRACE")
JESUS SAID TO "Boast"
Paul says, The opposite
of Jesus' words.
As a FACT.
Paul, also says opposite
of his own words.
The very word Paul
used to explain how
we should NOT boast,
in Ephesians.
The word he used
For "BOAST" Means
"to (make) boast joy glory rejoice."
'Strong's Concordances'
Definition of "Boast"
"Greek: καυχάομαι
Transliteration:
kauchaomai
Pronunciation: kow-khah'-om-ahee
Definition: From some (obsolete) base akin to
that of αὐχέω aucheō
(to boast) and G2172;
to vaunt (in a good or
a bad sense): - (make)
boast glory Joy rejoice."
Look at the last line...
"Make Boast, Glory, Joy Rejoice."
Matt. 5.16
Jesus said,
"let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good WORKS and GLORIFY" your father in heaven."
("Glorify," {glory} is a word used for "Boast" in Strong's. Concordance. And he's literally telling us to let the light shine so our "WORKS" will be seen by people and know God is involved in those works. And rejoice... )
In John 3.20-21
Jesus says, "for everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. But he who does the truth comes to the light. That his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been
done in God"
(that's boasting. Jesus said, to say out loud, what works we do. So that everyone can see the works and know it was God responsible for those good works. If Jesus says to Boast andpails says no Boasting,
Isn't Paul one of these Jesus refers to in John 3.19 ""for everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed."? After all, what deeds has Paul done, that would be bad for him to bring to light?)
And as we see in
1 Peter 3.15...
We better be able to prove faith and hope and works. And be ready for whatever occasion, at anytime, ANYONE asks on demand, why we have faith and hope. Why we "believe."
1 Peter 3.15
"But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:”
-KJV
And again as explained
In Wycliffe's Bible
1 Peter 3.15
"But hallow ye the Lord Christ in your hearts, and (for)evermore be ye ready to [do] satisfaction to each man asking you (for the) reason of that faith and hope that is in you, but with mildness, and dread, (But consecrate the Lord Messiah in your hearts, and always be ye ready to give satisfaction to each man asking you for the reason for the faith and hope that is in you, but with humility, and fearful reverence,)"
-Wycliffe's Bible
Check Strong's
Concordance:
Look at all the times
Jesus says the words
1. Grace
2. Faith
3. Works
4. Boast
"Faith." Jesus never
says the word "faith"
in the context of "the
end of ages," or
"salvation." Just a
Leper here, a dying
person there.
So...
Either Paul is stupid,
(which I don't think so,
he was highly educated)
or, he's deliberately
trying to trick us.
The definition and meaning of the word/name PAUL
Paul: meaning and etymology
-"Small," "Cessation,
"To stop," "Stopper."
-
"A Small (lie) Whisper(ed) That Propagates Into A Roaring Multitude"
-
From: the Greek verb
παυω (pauo),
"to stop,"
and Latin adjective
paulus,
"little" or "small."
-
(1) the verb פעה (pa'a),
to propagate a call for
support, and
(2) the letter ל (lamed), onto.
From the verb פלא (pala'),
to be Extraordinary.
EXTRAORDINARY
Origin:
From Late Middle English: from Latin extraordinarius, from extra ordinem
‘outside the normal
course of events’.
(Or, here, in his case,
'OUTSIDE THE NORMAL GOSPEL OF CHRIST'
To, "Stop" or, "Cessate"
(cease) The gospel
-
A derivative of Apollyon?
Apollyon:
"Destroyer"
From the verb απολλυμι (mapollumi), to destroy: from απο (apo), from, and ολλυμι (ollumi), to terminate.
JESUS'S LIST:
(A list of what
Jesus says, gets you
1. Sanctified, and
2. have the Mark/Seal of God.
3. To Abide in The Father.
4. To be Judged and rewarded, and thus qualifies you to be in his kingdom.
WORKS:
We are to do works of God to qualify for the kingdom... (keeping and Teaching
The Ten Commandments)
The books will be opened. Then, every deed, and every action will be accounted for. Our good works better out way our bad works.
Ans what if you didn't accrue
work? Because you ignored Jesus, when he said works, you followed Paul when he said Grace... A word Jesus NEVER SAID ONE TIME.
BOAST:
"Boasting" of
ones works,
"to bare witness"
to Everyone,
the magnificent
Glory of YHVH.
Thats all that gets
you saved.
No other methods,
that jesus mentions.
No mention of -Faith-
No mention if -Grace-
'PAU'L'S list:
(not Jesus')
1. "Grace"
(A WORD, and THEORY,
that Jesus NEVER said one time. Yet Paul's whole premise is built on
A False gospel of,
'saved by grace,
through Faith.'
Jesus never mentions
the word Grace, or
faith, in the context
of the end of days,
Jesus says, 'spread
the word, of our good works.
And let our works be shown, and pointed out specifically,
so people will know its Gods works.
Paul,
"WORKS" is wrong...
Works are of no value...
Paul is obviously
Teaching something
Jesus does not.
A False gospel.
If there is nothing that
we can do, that could
save us, and only the
"grace" of God can
save us, Then Jesus
is of no use to us.
And Jesus died in
vain. That's the purpose
of this, false gospel, paul preaches.
False apostle.
Paul is an AntiChrist.
And don't bring up
Peter either...
Matt. 10.33
👉🚫
👉🚫
👉🚫
🐓
???
Hi Joe. A lot of work that can useful to share.
Bur Jesus uses word in Greek. translated as grace in English when Paul uses it. But because in Greek charis - grace - means something different than Paul’s meaning of unearned favor, Jesus’ use 4x omits “grace” for Paul’s meaning collapses. So when Jesus speaks of grace as merited favor 4x, it is mistranslated I every bible by cover up terms..debt, thanks, and credit.
See my video:
th-cam.com/video/ArEBpmWPr_M/w-d-xo.html
Blessings Doug
HI Joe. I need to inform you Jesus in Greek uses the word CHARIS 4x in Luke's Gospel. When Paul utters it, it is translated always as "grace." When Jesus uses it, Jesus so clearly means it is merited by works more than sinners do from self-interest, that no Bible translates it as GRACE but substitute words like "credit," "thanks," etc.
www.jesuswordsonly.org/topicindex/697-grace-or-favor-in-the-bible.html
A second article discusses the difference in meaning between Paul and Jesus of the word CHARIS -- grace:
www.jesuswordsonly.org/topicindex/596-grace-in-paul-and-jesus-the-difference-in-usage.html
Blessings Doug
Peter called Paul's Epistles Scripture and apart of the Bible 2 Peter 3:16
HI Melvin. Obvoiusly later Peter and the other 11 decided otherwise. This is mentioned as fact by the Bishop of Ambrose even while declaring the Corinthians accepted Paul as apostle despite the 12's ruling.
This aligns with the "Ebion" -- the name of the apostolic church -- finding Paul an "apostate" (meaning a violator of Deut 13:1-10) from God's Law. Of course, we can replicate the reasoning ourselves for Paul in Gal. 3:19 says the "Law was given by angels through a Mediator" (Moses). Paul then goes on to say the Galatians are "foolish" for wanting to obey "days, season, and times" (Sabbath and the holidays), and "why do you want to be in bondage again to the weak and beggarly CELESTIAL BEINGS" (VIncent's correctino to the "elements" translation).
Jesus never said Peter was infallible, and quite obviously was not, as he denied Jesus 3x, and said many incorrect things that Jesus had to correct him over. The gospels prove that the 12 were only inspired to "recall my words," Jesus explains in John.
Blessings Doug
th-cam.com/video/PL-JKEIlSUA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=XCV2PHMxUU-BjiBT
Titus 1: 10
2nd Peter is one of the highly questioned books. What matters is what Jesus Christ taught (Matthew 28 verses 16 to 20). Not what paul taught. I highly recommend my works which expose Paul as a fraud
If you investigate it you will find that Peter was illiterate, so he did not write those words. Moreover, if he had written them, they would have to have been mircaoulsly written from his grave. Jesus taught the disciples for 3 years, and left his teachings in their hands, but then Paul did not walk with Jesus, self-promotes, and supposedly knows more than the Apostles. 2 Peter was written by someone we don't know who. Peter's name was stamped on it generations later. Whoeverr wrote it, wrote in Greek and wanted to cast Paul in a favorable and superior light. But if you really investigate and read every single time that Paull quotes the Torah (what you call the Old Testament) he misquotes and straight out twists and contorts the original to make it say what he wants it to say. Anyone reading the full chapter that he quotes from will see that he never quotes accurately. Paul obviously either did not know the Torah as he claims he did or he was dishonest, which is the same issues that happen with the average preacher today. It was easy to fool the people he preached to as they were Gentiles and did not have any background with the scriptures. Andso, we continue on the same path today with a generation of people who think they know the scriptures better than the ones to who the scriptures were given: the Jews.
Jesus, Paul, Peter and the rest of the apostles all taught one and the same gospel.
Hi Follow the Way. If you investigate, you will find that assumption is in conflict with the Apostolic writings outside Paul.
First, Apostle Matthew who wrote a gospel teaches opposite of Paul when Matthew quotes Jesus.
See the Contradictions by Paul of Jesus in our online article:
jesuswordsonly.github.io/recommendedreading/175-pauls-contradictions-of-jesus.html
We have a video series in process (25 episodes so far) on these contradictions if that is easier to review. See the list of URLS here:
airtable.com/shrODB6wlPMGO9ww1
John's Gospel and the Book of Revelation clearly refute Paul's doctrines. Our video series on John's Gospel once you learn the NIV Theological Dictionary by Zondervan but not followed by the NIV itself says "pisteuo" when referring to a person means "obey." Hence, the 30 times you think it says "believe in" jesus is the way to eternal life, it means "obeying" Jesus is the way to eternal life. Hence, John and Jesus are not speaking of faith like Paul but rather obedience to Jesus is key.
Here is a link to the URLS on the pisteuo issue: airtable.com/shrMubatVCax7Kz45
Our videos on Revelation and John's Gospel as antipaul are seen here:
airtable.com/shrOlIXpn2BAYwbwF
After the book of Revelation was recognized as anti-Paul by even pro-Paul scholars in the early 1800s, the move is to remove Revelation from canon slowly but surely just as Luther did by saying it was invalid, lacking the Holy Spirit.
I trust this will help on your journey to truth.
Blessings Doug
Wrong!
@@JesusIsTheLord777 HI Darius. If wrong, please show how those links I provide are wrong. OK?
Peter and Paul separated gospel due to circumcision.. Galatians 2: 7-8../ Acts 21: 21/ Titus 1: 10.. Galatians 5: 2-3..
Peter was supposed to be apostle to gentiles... Acts 15: 7
John 7: 23/ Luke 2: 21/ Acts 7: 8
90% percent of the people who think they all taught the same gospel, is because they have not truly Resarched and studied it. They have been taught this by a preacher who has been taught that by someone and/or believes this because his Church doctrines say it is so. the persuasions of their theology school and so forth. But with careful investigation, an open-mind, and Always seeking mind, will eventually find that Paul's teachings do not even agree with Jesus' teachings.