I feel that, although I used to feel that way about COD, then MW19 blew me away. There's always a chance 😄 in the meantime I'll keep trying BF3 until my laptop can't handle it anymore 😂
Unfortunately I never tried those, but the fans seem too dedicated to them to overlook them. I think we were all hoping Portal would achieve that but it just missed the mark. We can only hope they are updated or remained in some ways to give us that much wanted nostalgia hit!
God, why didn’t it have campaign characters you could play, ie: the specialist, but in campaign, and leave the run of the mill soldier in multiplayer, ie; have it like what bf5/1 does, with its war torn stories. HELL, could have it so that it has people on both sides of the political spectrum. Or even 3 sides. One for America, Russia, and the Nopats themselves. And lastly, let that scavenger mode from BF3 come back, for a whole new mode for 2042, where you scavenge things, to replace that extract mode. And, lastly, it could be like The Division 1/2, but first person. You scavenge things to come back alive. It could be like Warzone from Cod 2019/2022, where you can pick up different equipment, yk? Lastly, let us customize our characters in our own way. Tl;dr: Specialists in campaign, in the form of war stories from BF1/5, and run of the mill soldiers for the multiplayer/scavenger mode aspect.
We need a good Battlefield that isn't another theme park crossover quagmire man, please just give is a good Battlefield without hero classes or other self-insert nagging the industry has been completely overtaken by. Battlefield 2042 was designed to sell Battlefield to an audience who loves the above, but fell short of it, because the competition in that environment = free games. And to obtain this monumental failure, they threw their loyal fans and players off the boat. Idiots.
I agree with 99%, but Dice isn't the same anymore. They should let the IP battlefield die fr fr. There is just too much wrong withe everything within the devs, executives and leaders. Reason the original dice devs let was because, they were too stricted and not alloow to be cooking a good bf game. evntually after bf1 they all started leaving.
I've uninstalled the battlefields and that terrible EA app and gone back to Arma. Modern AAA fps games are not catered for my demographic anymore but the fortnight crowd.
Honestly true most game feel like they are made for the zoomers who think master chief is from fortnite they forget about the old players who want a game like what they used to play @@pooley3l33t
BF1 has been the only game that has made me feel like I’m actually in the trenches of WW1. The chaos, the way your weapon collects mud, the blimp falling down, the explosions and debris flying around. Everything was perfect.
Agreed, it’s the only battlefield that ever felt like real war. Every other battlefield is just huge maps with everyone running around aimlessly in vehicles. BF1 actually forces players together to fight.
God i remember the day i played my first online game EVER in my life, and it was Battlefield 4. I spend all my childhood playing on an unlocked Xbox 360, so i was never able to play online games. But in 2015-2016, my dad bought for me and my brother an xbox one and we buyed Battlefield 4 and then after that we buyed xbox live gold. Man, i remember it was my happiest day of my life. It was so magical, me and my brother stayed so impress with the game that we had to put on the watch like "each will play 2 hours and then change with one". BF4 was amazing, all those graphics, all the massive multiplayer, i remember that play with other people was so good that i got addicted with the game. Gunplay, levolution, map destructions, all cinematic. A real good Battlefield can turn boys to men 😅
Memories like that are great. For me I have that with the original Cod MW3, split screening survival and multiplayer with a close friend was awesome. Then when I got into BF3 we would play gun master and swap the controller, then BF4 was the first game we played online on our own consoles. Great times all round!
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag wow thats really cool, i played so many time cod games in split screen with my brother. Cool thing that years later on 2020 i bought another xbox one in home and me and my brother played BF4 together online, but on the same house since we live together. Thats was really cool, we still play together once in a while, me in one room and his on the other room at side of me. Online game can really intensifies our friendship and love for the people. Not only online game at course, games in overrall.
@@manydirt2600 I loved bf3's campaign alot more than bf4's tbh Bf4 feels like a huge (and don't get me wrong, AMAZING and fell in love with it) extension of bf3 yk ? The rocky launch wasn't amazing either so yeah
Bfbc has been topped a while ago. You're just a bf fan boy that thinks destruction or levolution makes you're game special than it really is 😂 and it doesn't. It just makes it an Overrated fps.
@TheGuyWithNoGamertag even if all the smart gamers do this, i imagine there are enough people who eat up whatever slop ea churns out that they can still make these subar games without consequences
I'd pay a lot of money to play a modern take on BF2/BF3. Back in the mid-late 2000's we had 3 PC's and 2 internet connections in the house so my brother, my dad and I could all play BF2 at the same time. Have yet to experience another fps that I enjoyed to such an extent, a legendary BF title in my opinion.
Battlefield 2 was the shit, that game spoke to a own audience, people praising battlefield 3 and 4 only got some good leftovers, you can still play BF3 and 4 but not BF2 they even sued someone over it, i met friends over BF2 where we are still irl friends today, i havent barely spoken to a soul in BF4,
Why battlefield (4) was great ? Very simple: Great map design Good shooting system No cancel slide dogshit Insane variety of weapons to chose (90% of them valid) No meta And of course the classic battlefield game modes Forgot 2 more things: Classes (medic, engeneer, support and scout were great imo) Map evolution of course, keep that thing
@@shawnjackson3764 AEK with stubby grip + G18 + grenadier field upgrade + noob tube = OP combo Sad to see so many people not leave that meta nowadays, makes the game painfully unbalanced
the response curve input is bugged at an engine level and the dev team even acknowledged aspects of this like recoil bugs, but never fixed it. The core engine of 2042 is bugged, flawed, and will never be fixed.
Yep. I played the game for free and still felt like I got ripped off. Back when it became clear that DICE had given up on making a cohesive game world with Battlefield V (I can’t believe they managed to screw up World War 2), I quit and got into Hell Let Loose. Now, that game has its own set of issues, but it was so refreshing being in a believable “war” setting again. Normal frontline soldiers fighting other normal frontline soldiers.
There's a reason why I play Squad. Squad is like Battlefield, but in a different dimension where BF didn't go arcadey and instead went heavier on teamwork, coordination, authenticity. The BF franchise is dead. And with the news that EA is now deciding to shut down the online servers of BF3 and BF4, it makes it even more clear that that's the case. At this point, even if they miraculously made a good BF game, there's still the thought in the back of your mind that it will get shut down eventually. If EA is essentially telling us that we no longer own their games, but rather renting them for a finite amount of time, then I'm out completely. I'll stick to indie devs and AA studios that actually have passion for their games and do a way better job at capturing the magic of games I once loved.
Squad runs like shit tho. Optimization is terrible and because of that it would never be able to handle destruction. I wish it ran better and had destruction but we’ll probably never see that in the game.
@@Shaggii_ yeah for some people it does. But If you have a mid level PC you might have issues. But I have everything set to high at 1440p and get 70-90fps so I have no issues. But doesn't mean they could use some optimization. But as for destruction no. Sure, it's sounds cool and makes the game feel more immersive, but it would break the balance of the game. if there was destruction, the meta would just be all vic teams sitting from afar and just shelling the buildings, commander calling in arty, and mortar teams raining down fire. The defense team would just all be dead, and any lucky enough to survive have no cover and get picked off. At the end of the day, the attacking team can just cheese the defenders and make it easy for them to just walk right in. And not only that but then the map would just become boring and no longer interesting. So what, 3 minutes of one sided fun for the attacking team to go crazy and blow stuff up, all for the next 10 minutes of capping the point to be a boring, flattened wasteland with no ability for the defending team to hold it? Squad needs the indestructible buildings.
Hardline legitimately taught me how to be a good helicopter pilot in games lol. High-speed low flying while chasing people’s cars never got old. So fun.
BF2042 was such a wasted opportunity. The mercenary setting could have been great. If they would have taken the money system from Black Ops 1, slowed down the movement system from BFV and made it feel a little heavier and clunkier, kept the fortifications and call in system from BFV and made the weapons and vehicles feel more ragtag and thrown together instead of fresh and shiny, it would have been amazing. You earn money in game for call ins, then you earn a portion of that from winning, contracts, or level ups for cosmetics, weapons, attachments, or vehicles. BFV's movement felt great but slow it down to make it feel like youre a soldier wearing heavy ass armor and carrying around heavy ass weapons.
Bad Company 2 was arguably one of the "slowest" BF games, but it was the perfect balance between fast-paced gameplay and teamwork, while BF3 felt like CoD if it was any good, BC2 felt like war, it was immersive, when movement is limited, it's teamwork that wins the battle, the destruction was way better too. On BF3 is where it started the bunny-hopping super soldiers, some buildings could never be destroyed or brought down to the ground completely, BC2 was more dynamic and far more immersive
Just started playing bc2 again the other day via project rome and it is still fantastic. Everything turned up to the max, 3440x1440 @144 locked, big ol fov, 2010 me on ps3 would've never believed how good this game can look. I had a blast in a pretty full 24/7 arica harbor server, just wish more people played so there was more diversity.
@@EhEhEhEINSTEIN The game was heavily underestimated, a lot of BF3 players never even touched BC2, that's why there's so few people playing, and these "single mode/single map" servers were already there before the shutdown, I knew if online were to be revived, that these same servers would come back, these guys need to add some variety, BC2's maps are the best, there's never a bad map on that game, specially if you mod some spawn protection into the server
Seeing Battlefield have Tactical Sprint, I first thought would be awesome, lets you run past while your friend lays down some cover. Until you realize your friend can't lay down cover because they have no cover in the first place. Tactical sprint shouldn't have been like Call of Duty's. COD has always been fast paced sprint around on small maps, Battlefield was always about the big maps, Tac Sprint should've been a trade off in my opinion, lets you run faster, but your weapon is out of your hands, meaning you have to stop, pull back out your rifle before you can shoot, because I don't know about others, but when I sprint, I can't just stop, I usually need to slow down first.
I stopped playing Battlefield, only occasionally some BF5, but other than this I just wait for a worthy successor, I switched many years ago to Squad due to the development that happened to the Battlefield series. For my fast paced kick I play The Finals, as they nailed the destruction and fun of the movement imo. Let's hope for the best to get a new Battlefield like good series or DICE getting a good BF together, but I kinda lost that hope. But in terms of immersion, next to Squad, BF the older ones, but also up until BF5 are just so more immersive.
Over the years the BF games were a staple for me, my favourite and easily most played was 2142 Titan mode, followed by BF2, BF Vietnam, BC2, and BF3, while I enjoyed BF4 its launch was bad and it took a while for Dice to iron out the bugs and flaws but it did get there but by then I was done, some of it me with burnout and some of it the state of the game and not having faith in EA Dice to really deliver what I wanted for a Battlefield game. I enjoyed MW for what it was, it's a great run and gun shooter but I always preferred the team dynamics and scale of Battlefield, while I never played BF1 it looked good and so did BF V for the most even with it's hilarious DEi slant but even watching gameplay from other content creators it just started to look like the gameplay was CoD in serious underpants. I remember it being quite common in a lobby in earlier BF titles that a player could top the team score with a negative K/D simply because they focused on the objective and not their personal frag count, that was the beauty of BF for me you had to be a team and play for each other and the objective. With the removal of classes in BF 2042 they have basically admitted they want to be like CoD but bigger and more bombastic and it's a change for the worst, I think BF as I knew it and want it to be is dead and never coming back.
Battlefield needs to leave behind the current gaming tropes. Unfortunately i dont think the investors at EA will let them be creatively free enough to create a gritty grounded setting that bf3/bf4/bf1 all had
In this current day and age of EA/Dice.... I wouldn't bet on it. With that being said, if i ever do get a Battlefield itch, ill just go back to the previous titles that I have on PC.
Very good video on a topic that plagues the gaming industry. I think a big problem is not just the players that are tryharding, its the mechanincs that enable this type of gameplay in every modern fps game, as higher ttks promote less tactical play and more movement. I belive this was caused by the popularity of esports, making all developers afraid of taking risks and making the game as slow and competitive as possible. Another problem as you mentioned are the skins, being part of the cod community i have seen players wanting more grounded skins being bullied by the big content creators. I would recommend you trying cod hardcore, tarkov, project reality or squad being a more realistic battlefield game. Best of luck growing your channel!
Thanks, I have played a bit of cod hardcore which does give a bit more of a tactical feel. I think I'd need to build a PC to try Tarkov or squad as my laptop was on the struggle bus trying to play bf3 and record it for this video 😂
You are one of the awaken few whom understand this. People just don't understand. Their minds are too numb and preoccupied with flashy things. They forgot what a good game feels like. Cod have turned into some park our/paintball simulator game.
I GREW UP playing COD Black ops, Black ops 2, Modern Warfare series etc. I used to absolutely LOVE these games. Menus were simple, gameplay was smooth, characters didn’t look like cartoons, no additional expansion packs, campaign blended in with the multiplayer etc. Then came the era of the jet pack based, quick movements, neon characters, ultra futuristic, robots etc nonsense, menus which look like ads etc in COD. Then I dropped the franchise and moved to Battlefield. I thoroughly enjoyed BF3, BF4 and BF1. However I feel ever since then, the main two FPS games - COD and BF HAVE LOST THEIR IDENTITY. I’m thoroughly disappointed
I still play only BF4 NOW... Destruction, BF3 TEAM TALK, All type of platform play (soldier, tank, helicopter, boat), specialisation creating dependency (running after the support guy.!!)... I'll sit here an wait.
This is y I have been on Tom Clancy Breakpoint....u can b more tactical on it with right ppl. U can limit ur HUD for a better immersion... although, not exactly a fan of the robots but I find more MilSim players there than on the recent BF games. I will say I started BF franchise with BF3. With that, I fell n love with BF series but it started to degrade when BF1 came out....BFV was remnants of BF then BF2042 just turned into COD....and I left COD because of BF. I want the old BF back. The true immersion and utilization of bullet drop... environmental damage.... just legit world immersion.
Easy subscribe. Beautifully said. I miss feeling like every time I start up battlefield I was ready for a new experience and to achieve something worth the grind while improving. Excellent video brother
What I love about BF4 and BF1 is that anyone can start now and still have massive fun just like the ones who played the game at launch. You nailed it with consistency, many games dont follow that principle in 2024 because they want to compete with Fortnite and COD. I think BF7 wont be anywhere near like BF3 and BF4 and itll take a whole EA shakedown for Battfield to be king again.
Battlefield was the best because it evolved to be a perfect compromise of chaotic fun and tactical play. Although a lot didn't play it in a very co-op, objectives, team-based way, a lot did and that emphasis made it much better than CoD, etc. Along with good vehicle play, ithe core experience was simply much more complex, interesting and thoughtful than other shooters. I've played every BF and loved them all, with each being an improvement overall until BF5, when EA decided to prioritise monetisation and try and cash in on the Battle Royale fad. Then, although they advertised BF2042 using nostalgic imagery, they moved even further away from the core Battlefield experience, making it both Battle Royale _and_ Hero Shooter based. EA just don't know or care what they are doing with the franchise. They have no interest in what the BF fanbase enjoy. They are more interested in trying to get a new, modern audience even at the expense of the large old audience. I'm still playing BF1. Best BF (though I appreciate those that want modern warfare prefer BF4). BF1 is the perfect compromise of accessibility for noobs and fun for experienced players. The skill gap wasn't large, but wasn't small. Skilled twitch players do well. More thoughtful tactical players do well. Lone wolves can do well, if skilled, but squad/team play has a clear advantage. Noobs don't get too badly pounded. The fun chaos and the skill sweat is balanced. I have no hope for the franchise. Everything that EA have said about BF6 so far is even further again unlike the classic Battlefield experience.
True, MW 2019 was the last good one, now its rabbits vs ducks vs other whacky characters toy game, nothing military anymore, just money maker for Activision/Blizzard
You hit it on the head for call of duty, you can not play casually anymore because there is soo many sweats. even if we are ranked under 200 we get matched with people who are 900 and destroy us.
awesome video from new TH-camr from Brazil I hope your channel become a rocket and ative higher altitudes. Same idea on everything. Gain one more subscriber!
It's a game I still want to go back to, the only thing stopping me is having not installed it on the newer consoles 🙂 so many good maps and a fun experience all round!
@@Moss_and_Such yeah, the infantry focused ones I enjoyed a lot, have some cool moments, didn't find the vehicle/infantry balance suited me as there's no teamwork incentive 😂
My go-to is Battlefield 4. The current DICE isn't capable of making a great Battlefield game. Much talent would need to be hired to change the situation.
about the server you explained.. '' when you start to find these servers you like you start to recognize certain players, perhaps you'll befriend them perhaps you'll get a rivalry, and those little things create those stories that make players so excited and so nostalgic for your game because they've got those memories that they attach to. and they just script that or make that happen without having these tools to allow the community to drive the experience of the game. '' many of us BF players will def agree with this, those friends we made all the way, the countless moments and fondest memories will be with us forever.
For a up and coming channel, fantastic quality and information mate. Whole heartedly agree, ohh I’d love to go back to bf3 days squading up with my friends. Subbed 👍
For the point made around the 4:10 mark, this is why PS has a bit of an L when it comes to backwards compatibility compared to PC (because obviously PC wins this as there is no generation division) and Xbox, but to a lesser extent. To even sweeten the deal Xbox game pass makes it easier as EA Play is bundled in at higher game pass tiers which allows for Battlefield 3 and onward to be installed and played on demand
@@beastmode1915 yeah ps has dropped the ball a bit, although I think PS3 BF3 servers were shut down years ago, if not they were pretty much dead because of no backwards compatibility 😞
I always find it funny when someone says "MW 2019 went back to what COD used to be" because as someone who's played COD quite a lot throughout my life and for many years, and as someone who goes back to play old COD Games all the time... MW 2019 is nothing like old COD. MW 2019 is what you remember old COD to be, not what it actually is. I also don't like this take because MW 2019 was clearly designed with the lowest skill player in mind and that makes the game far less fun and enjoyable than it could've been. These things also go for MWII ofc as well. Also, a big reason people are such tryhards now is because nowadays every game is infested with this SBMM or EOMM system, forcing everyone to play with others of the exact same skill level, making people want to tryhard to fight that horrid system. It's unfortunate, but it's an issue that's been plaguing MP Games for quite awhile now. I agree with most of your points though, at least for BF. I don't feel COD has really ever been immersive, so i'm fine with movement being in that game, but other than a basic slide, I don't think movement really fits into the Battlefield style, vibe and game balance. BF was made to be a semi-realistic casual shooter, but COD was never really like that, it just didn't have movement, but it still had unrealistic stuff like perks, weapon camos, attachments that didn't change the look of your weapon, etc. where Battlefield went the extra mile to make the game feel more realistic and less casual and more immersive in it's design.
@@DeadSpacedOut Absolutely agree, for me it felt like my memory of the old games but brought up to modern standards. The campaign gripped me like original MW2 and the multiplayer felt awesome until people discovered slide cancels and then bounce house begins. The old bf's did have those immersive details, some hardcore games have rhem too but again it's nice to have that in a casual game
Finally someone addresses the main issue of battlefield and cod ! The movement of the characters! It’s so fast and over the top ! I can’t even relaxed my eyes! I’m from india and I’m console person i have to play with cross play on because i can not find any lobbies if turn it off and pc players are like aim bot and so fast aiming speed i just can’t stand a chance on a console in battlefield !!
@@Ill06Taco those of us who want to play with friends on other platforms do unfortunately, and by the sounds of it, come the end of the year there'll be fewer options 😞
I went through this while playing MW2019's ground war mode. Luckily I enjoyed BFV, especially after the Pacific theater was introduced. So I went and played that, and occasionally went back to BF3, BF4, BF1 and even Hardline. Nothing has really been able to capture the same magic as even the sub-par Battlefield games for me, unfortunately. As many problems as 2042 has, I still find it more enjoyable overall than any Call of Duty game that's come out in the past 12 years.
I agree on every point, except weapon attachments. While i agree the current min-max meta stuff needs to go away, i do love making my virtual gun "mine". Modern weapons have a lego-like aspect to them, and seeing that represented in the fps im playing is awesome. I wish i could have as many attachments as i want, and the only thing it would affect is my characters movement speed.
@@cpin1992 I do like it from the visual side it is fun to see all the parts fit together but also there's so many attachments I never use it is kind of a waste. Most players prioritise min ads and sprint out so the customisation gets lost anyway 😞
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag If attachments were mostly just eye candy then it's just an addition to the game and not a detractor in any way. In warzone for example, I'll pick a foregrip that closely resembles the one I have on my real life rifle. The variety on offer is great. BUT, I know that I am probably negatively affecting my weapon stats, and I can't be bothered to take the sweaty approach to weapon customization because 1, The gun almost always looks stupid. 2, I'm an adult with little time to play, so I'm not going to spend time min-maxing my build and 3, no matter how I set my class up, the rest of the game is ruined by everything else you mentioned in this fantastic video. Weapon customization is one aspect I love in an fps game. That gets ruined when there is also a min-max meta or a limit on attachments because of having to balance everything. Devs should give players variety while keeping everything theme concurrent. Same with weapon skins and character skins. You wouldn't want to see someone in BF1 running around with a Tommy gun equipped with a laser, LPVO, and telescopic stocks, while dressed like Santa Claus or the easter bunny. I don't want to see a modern themed BF with no or very little attachments because that isn't representative of modern weapons. Still don't want to see tacticool Santa Claus here either.
only 346 subs seems a bit low for the quality of this content, lets make that one more I cant say how much i loved the battlefield franchise, it was the game i grew up with and kept playing BF 4 for years even when newer games in the franchise were coming out. it just worked and whatever made it work is missing nowadays, i miss the countless days of playing siege of shangai domination hardcore 24/7 server. i wholy agree with the points about twitche Esporty movement shooter fast paced ADHD dopamine mechanics and design making its way into games where it doesnt necessarily belong, that has a lot to do with why i dont enjoy most FPS games made nowadays despite loving them in the past with games like (old) R6S, battlefield and such
@@chost-059 Thanks, I appreciate it. I wasn't sure how the video would be received but it appears to have resonated with a group who wants games to be fun again 🙂
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag i believe its an increasingly common view from people born between 90's-early 2000's that grew up playing older style games that used to be unique and creative and most importantly made to be fun Now a lot of us feel very discontent with the modern wannabe next eSporty game FPS
What a great video and its all so true!! Just watched the video without seeing how long it is, soon as the battlefield footage started I couldnt stop watching. We need a good battlefield!
Sorry to be this nitpicky, but at 45:10 you say that Battlefield 2042 launcued without a scoreboard. This is particularly untrue. It did have a scoreboard, but it was confusing to find and a half-baked experimental version that didn't have any competitive implements.
i really hopeDICE got their shit together and listened to all the feedback they got the last 5+ years. I wish the next BF would be another GOATed BF like BC2 & BF3 were🙌 Amazing video btw. this deserves so much more views!
I miss BF3 so much. I started playing playing Battlebit Remasterd and love it cause it's so simple but sadly the devs are now trying to ruin it, they are trying to make a game for the casuals that will play the game for a week after update, then go back to their AAA titles like COD and Fortnite, you're not going to win those people over!!!! stop trying to, make a game for the fans. Battlebit is proof that and old school BF game will work, no hero, just classes with good teamwork, can move fast or slow. It really has "only in battlefield" moments. I miss those days so much
It may sound cringe, but as someone that grew up with all of the originals like Battlefield 1942, BFBC2, etc. as well as playing every call of duty as it came out- this is genuinely depressing. What has the world come to? Where is the identity in anything? Corporate slop.
I will never play battle royals games and to this date battlefield 2042 is the only shooter with the game loop I enjoy. Close to 2500 hours and I still enjoy it. There’s no other game filling that niche style so I will play it till the next one comes out. Will forever hate Fortnite and what it did to the industry. Insane the new CoD has a Nicky Minaj skin. Battlefield didn’t became bad. The gamers played Fortnite…
Every point was spot on. I loved the 2010 era battlefields and no game has matched the feel and vibe yet. I still love my movement based shooters like apex but to go back to this lost style would be so much appreciated. I hope someone at dice watches this video.
Unfortunately Dice and EA can no longer deliver. They moved away from the classic algorithm to chase something new and they seem like their doubling down. BF 2,3,4 and Bad Company series were the good hits they'll never get back. BF1 was good but wasn't the game that captured and V was good-ish over time.
Idk how BF3 and BF4 are going to be matched with the current gaming landscape
I agree… still playing BF3 to this day on PC…
I feel that, although I used to feel that way about COD, then MW19 blew me away. There's always a chance 😄 in the meantime I'll keep trying BF3 until my laptop can't handle it anymore 😂
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag I’ve been getting back into bf3 do you need a squad mate??
@@havocr6191 you are more than welcome to join any TNT server
no game gonna match bf3 and mw2 ever, mark my words
DICE destroyed any trust I had in them with Bf V, they have to win our trust once again
Battlefield 2042 maps are like unseasoned fried chicken
@@eknockonxbox4900 😂
2 and 2142 where the best in my opinion....I want thoose with more modern Gunplay and Graphics
Unfortunately I never tried those, but the fans seem too dedicated to them to overlook them. I think we were all hoping Portal would achieve that but it just missed the mark. We can only hope they are updated or remained in some ways to give us that much wanted nostalgia hit!
2142 was my first experience with Battlefield and I would love to have a remake that keeps the aesthetic.
2142 is the one i dislike the most and I have played every single Battlefield.
God, why didn’t it have campaign characters you could play, ie: the specialist, but in campaign, and leave the run of the mill soldier in multiplayer, ie; have it like what bf5/1 does, with its war torn stories. HELL, could have it so that it has people on both sides of the political spectrum.
Or even 3 sides. One for America, Russia, and the Nopats themselves.
And lastly, let that scavenger mode from BF3 come back, for a whole new mode for 2042, where you scavenge things, to replace that extract mode.
And, lastly, it could be like The Division 1/2, but first person.
You scavenge things to come back alive.
It could be like Warzone from Cod 2019/2022, where you can pick up different equipment, yk?
Lastly, let us customize our characters in our own way.
Tl;dr: Specialists in campaign, in the form of war stories from BF1/5, and run of the mill soldiers for the multiplayer/scavenger mode aspect.
We need a good Battlefield that isn't another theme park crossover quagmire man, please just give is a good Battlefield without hero classes or other self-insert nagging the industry has been completely overtaken by.
Battlefield 2042 was designed to sell Battlefield to an audience who loves the above, but fell short of it, because the competition in that environment = free games. And to obtain this monumental failure, they threw their loyal fans and players off the boat. Idiots.
I agree with 99%, but Dice isn't the same anymore. They should let the IP battlefield die fr fr. There is just too much wrong withe everything within the devs, executives and leaders. Reason the original dice devs let was because, they were too stricted and not alloow to be cooking a good bf game. evntually after bf1 they all started leaving.
Why ppl dont like bf 5
And I still play battlefield 4, sometime 3 but I will keep playing it until DICE create a worthy successor to battlefield 4
Both great games, I'm glad I have 3 running on PC now, means I can play it whenever! 🙂
I've uninstalled the battlefields and that terrible EA app and gone back to Arma.
Modern AAA fps games are not catered for my demographic anymore but the fortnight crowd.
@@pooley3l33tthe EA app is absolutely atrocious, it’s a big reason why I still launch bf3 and bf4 in battlelog, far superior to the EA app
Honestly true most game feel like they are made for the zoomers who think master chief is from fortnite they forget about the old players who want a game like what they used to play @@pooley3l33t
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag
EA is reportedly shutting down both titles (BF 3 and BF 4) in November, this year🤔🙄
Your thoughts about it in video, maybe🤔?
BF1 has been the only game that has made me feel like I’m actually in the trenches of WW1. The chaos, the way your weapon collects mud, the blimp falling down, the explosions and debris flying around. Everything was perfect.
Agreed, it’s the only battlefield that ever felt like real war. Every other battlefield is just huge maps with everyone running around aimlessly in vehicles. BF1 actually forces players together to fight.
God i remember the day i played my first online game EVER in my life, and it was Battlefield 4. I spend all my childhood playing on an unlocked Xbox 360, so i was never able to play online games. But in 2015-2016, my dad bought for me and my brother an xbox one and we buyed Battlefield 4 and then after that we buyed xbox live gold. Man, i remember it was my happiest day of my life. It was so magical, me and my brother stayed so impress with the game that we had to put on the watch like "each will play 2 hours and then change with one". BF4 was amazing, all those graphics, all the massive multiplayer, i remember that play with other people was so good that i got addicted with the game. Gunplay, levolution, map destructions, all cinematic. A real good Battlefield can turn boys to men 😅
Memories like that are great. For me I have that with the original Cod MW3, split screening survival and multiplayer with a close friend was awesome. Then when I got into BF3 we would play gun master and swap the controller, then BF4 was the first game we played online on our own consoles. Great times all round!
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag wow thats really cool, i played so many time cod games in split screen with my brother. Cool thing that years later on 2020 i bought another xbox one in home and me and my brother played BF4 together online, but on the same house since we live together. Thats was really cool, we still play together once in a while, me in one room and his on the other room at side of me. Online game can really intensifies our friendship and love for the people. Not only online game at course, games in overrall.
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag lol u r getting pissy over a few seconds black screen....i can see why u got only 9k
what?
Bad Company 2 has never been topped in my opinion.
Unfortunately I never played it, but I know it holds a special place for those who did! 🙂
Why wouldn't you say that about bf3 ?
@@astora8768I'd say it about battlefield 4. 3 and 4 were absurdly good.
@@manydirt2600 I loved bf3's campaign alot more than bf4's tbh
Bf4 feels like a huge (and don't get me wrong, AMAZING and fell in love with it) extension of bf3 yk ? The rocky launch wasn't amazing either so yeah
Bfbc has been topped a while ago. You're just a bf fan boy that thinks destruction or levolution makes you're game special than it really is 😂 and it doesn't. It just makes it an Overrated fps.
The developers r gone
Just accept this reality
We will never get a battlefield game as good as BF1, BF4 OR BF3, its over
i hate that
i dont know if the concept artist still even on DICE
everyone is gone, fck you EA for pushing deadlines and stupid monetization stuffs
Bro just flew in from frown town
Don't pre-buy. Do not hand over your money to EA before they have proved they made a product worthy of it.
@@bearacuda Agreed
@TheGuyWithNoGamertag even if all the smart gamers do this, i imagine there are enough people who eat up whatever slop ea churns out that they can still make these subar games without consequences
I'd pay a lot of money to play a modern take on BF2/BF3. Back in the mid-late 2000's we had 3 PC's and 2 internet connections in the house so my brother, my dad and I could all play BF2 at the same time. Have yet to experience another fps that I enjoyed to such an extent, a legendary BF title in my opinion.
Battlefield 2 was the shit, that game spoke to a own audience, people praising battlefield 3 and 4 only got some good leftovers, you can still play BF3 and 4 but not BF2 they even sued someone over it, i met friends over BF2 where we are still irl friends today, i havent barely spoken to a soul in BF4,
Why battlefield (4) was great ? Very simple:
Great map design
Good shooting system
No cancel slide dogshit
Insane variety of weapons to chose (90% of them valid)
No meta
And of course the classic battlefield game modes
Forgot 2 more things:
Classes (medic, engeneer, support and scout were great imo)
Map evolution of course, keep that thing
Hard disagree on the "great map design" in BF4. It was mediocre at best.
BF3 is the gold standard for that.
Classes doesn’t matter anymore. It’s a new generation of gamers out there. BF 2042 had a terrible start but today it’s perfect.
@@paralleluniverse99 true that. Most of the good maps from bf4 are the ones recycled from bf3.
Map design was weak, especially compared to BF2142, BC2 and BF3.
Meta ? The Ace 23 was insane.
@@shawnjackson3764 AEK with stubby grip + G18 + grenadier field upgrade + noob tube = OP combo
Sad to see so many people not leave that meta nowadays, makes the game painfully unbalanced
The movement in 2042 felt to floaty for me so I never really played it again
the response curve input is bugged at an engine level and the dev team even acknowledged aspects of this like recoil bugs, but never fixed it. The core engine of 2042 is bugged, flawed, and will never be fixed.
Yep. I played the game for free and still felt like I got ripped off.
Back when it became clear that DICE had given up on making a cohesive game world with Battlefield V (I can’t believe they managed to screw up World War 2), I quit and got into Hell Let Loose. Now, that game has its own set of issues, but it was so refreshing being in a believable “war” setting again. Normal frontline soldiers fighting other normal frontline soldiers.
There's a reason why I play Squad. Squad is like Battlefield, but in a different dimension where BF didn't go arcadey and instead went heavier on teamwork, coordination, authenticity. The BF franchise is dead. And with the news that EA is now deciding to shut down the online servers of BF3 and BF4, it makes it even more clear that that's the case. At this point, even if they miraculously made a good BF game, there's still the thought in the back of your mind that it will get shut down eventually. If EA is essentially telling us that we no longer own their games, but rather renting them for a finite amount of time, then I'm out completely.
I'll stick to indie devs and AA studios that actually have passion for their games and do a way better job at capturing the magic of games I once loved.
Squad runs like shit tho. Optimization is terrible and because of that it would never be able to handle destruction. I wish it ran better and had destruction but we’ll probably never see that in the game.
@@Shaggii_ yeah for some people it does. But If you have a mid level PC you might have issues. But I have everything set to high at 1440p and get 70-90fps so I have no issues. But doesn't mean they could use some optimization.
But as for destruction no. Sure, it's sounds cool and makes the game feel more immersive, but it would break the balance of the game. if there was destruction, the meta would just be all vic teams sitting from afar and just shelling the buildings, commander calling in arty, and mortar teams raining down fire. The defense team would just all be dead, and any lucky enough to survive have no cover and get picked off.
At the end of the day, the attacking team can just cheese the defenders and make it easy for them to just walk right in. And not only that but then the map would just become boring and no longer interesting. So what, 3 minutes of one sided fun for the attacking team to go crazy and blow stuff up, all for the next 10 minutes of capping the point to be a boring, flattened wasteland with no ability for the defending team to hold it? Squad needs the indestructible buildings.
BF3 and BF4 were on a different level than anything else. Even Hardline was really good. I hope they make a good one soon.
@@TheDoats nothing has given me that one more round feeling like those games 😀
Hardline legitimately taught me how to be a good helicopter pilot in games lol. High-speed low flying while chasing people’s cars never got old. So fun.
BF2042 was such a wasted opportunity. The mercenary setting could have been great. If they would have taken the money system from Black Ops 1, slowed down the movement system from BFV and made it feel a little heavier and clunkier, kept the fortifications and call in system from BFV and made the weapons and vehicles feel more ragtag and thrown together instead of fresh and shiny, it would have been amazing. You earn money in game for call ins, then you earn a portion of that from winning, contracts, or level ups for cosmetics, weapons, attachments, or vehicles. BFV's movement felt great but slow it down to make it feel like youre a soldier wearing heavy ass armor and carrying around heavy ass weapons.
Bad Company 2 was arguably one of the "slowest" BF games, but it was the perfect balance between fast-paced gameplay and teamwork, while BF3 felt like CoD if it was any good, BC2 felt like war, it was immersive, when movement is limited, it's teamwork that wins the battle, the destruction was way better too. On BF3 is where it started the bunny-hopping super soldiers, some buildings could never be destroyed or brought down to the ground completely, BC2 was more dynamic and far more immersive
Just started playing bc2 again the other day via project rome and it is still fantastic. Everything turned up to the max, 3440x1440 @144 locked, big ol fov, 2010 me on ps3 would've never believed how good this game can look. I had a blast in a pretty full 24/7 arica harbor server, just wish more people played so there was more diversity.
@@EhEhEhEINSTEIN The game was heavily underestimated, a lot of BF3 players never even touched BC2, that's why there's so few people playing, and these "single mode/single map" servers were already there before the shutdown, I knew if online were to be revived, that these same servers would come back, these guys need to add some variety, BC2's maps are the best, there's never a bad map on that game, specially if you mod some spawn protection into the server
Battlefield as we love it is dead. Its shell we only be used by EA/Dice so shovel the next Fortnight/Overwatch clone .
For a campaign mode I just want a competent squad in a single player.
Seeing Battlefield have Tactical Sprint, I first thought would be awesome, lets you run past while your friend lays down some cover.
Until you realize your friend can't lay down cover because they have no cover in the first place.
Tactical sprint shouldn't have been like Call of Duty's. COD has always been fast paced sprint around on small maps, Battlefield was always about the big maps, Tac Sprint should've been a trade off in my opinion, lets you run faster, but your weapon is out of your hands, meaning you have to stop, pull back out your rifle before you can shoot, because I don't know about others, but when I sprint, I can't just stop, I usually need to slow down first.
I literally just started playing BF3 and BF4 again cause these games they are releasing now are crap. I'm having fun gaming again playing BF4.
I stopped playing Battlefield, only occasionally some BF5, but other than this I just wait for a worthy successor, I switched many years ago to Squad due to the development that happened to the Battlefield series. For my fast paced kick I play The Finals, as they nailed the destruction and fun of the movement imo.
Let's hope for the best to get a new Battlefield like good series or DICE getting a good BF together, but I kinda lost that hope.
But in terms of immersion, next to Squad, BF the older ones, but also up until BF5 are just so more immersive.
Over the years the BF games were a staple for me, my favourite and easily most played was 2142 Titan mode, followed by BF2, BF Vietnam, BC2, and BF3, while I enjoyed BF4 its launch was bad and it took a while for Dice to iron out the bugs and flaws but it did get there but by then I was done, some of it me with burnout and some of it the state of the game and not having faith in EA Dice to really deliver what I wanted for a Battlefield game.
I enjoyed MW for what it was, it's a great run and gun shooter but I always preferred the team dynamics and scale of Battlefield, while I never played BF1 it looked good and so did BF V for the most even with it's hilarious DEi slant but even watching gameplay from other content creators it just started to look like the gameplay was CoD in serious underpants. I remember it being quite common in a lobby in earlier BF titles that a player could top the team score with a negative K/D simply because they focused on the objective and not their personal frag count, that was the beauty of BF for me you had to be a team and play for each other and the objective. With the removal of classes in BF 2042 they have basically admitted they want to be like CoD but bigger and more bombastic and it's a change for the worst, I think BF as I knew it and want it to be is dead and never coming back.
Battlefield needs to leave behind the current gaming tropes. Unfortunately i dont think the investors at EA will let them be creatively free enough to create a gritty grounded setting that bf3/bf4/bf1 all had
Still missing BF2 those times...
BF3 was the colsest thing to it.
In this current day and age of EA/Dice.... I wouldn't bet on it. With that being said, if i ever do get a Battlefield itch, ill just go back to the previous titles that I have on PC.
Very good video on a topic that plagues the gaming industry. I think a big problem is not just the players that are tryharding, its the mechanincs that enable this type of gameplay in every modern fps game, as higher ttks promote less tactical play and more movement. I belive this was caused by the popularity of esports, making all developers afraid of taking risks and making the game as slow and competitive as possible. Another problem as you mentioned are the skins, being part of the cod community i have seen players wanting more grounded skins being bullied by the big content creators.
I would recommend you trying cod hardcore, tarkov, project reality or squad being a more realistic battlefield game.
Best of luck growing your channel!
Thanks, I have played a bit of cod hardcore which does give a bit more of a tactical feel. I think I'd need to build a PC to try Tarkov or squad as my laptop was on the struggle bus trying to play bf3 and record it for this video 😂
You are one of the awaken few whom understand this. People just don't understand. Their minds are too numb and preoccupied with flashy things. They forgot what a good game feels like. Cod have turned into some park our/paintball simulator game.
I GREW UP playing COD Black ops, Black ops 2, Modern Warfare series etc.
I used to absolutely LOVE these games. Menus were simple, gameplay was smooth, characters didn’t look like cartoons, no additional expansion packs, campaign blended in with the multiplayer etc.
Then came the era of the jet pack based, quick movements, neon characters, ultra futuristic, robots etc nonsense, menus which look like ads etc in COD.
Then I dropped the franchise and moved to Battlefield.
I thoroughly enjoyed BF3, BF4 and BF1.
However I feel ever since then, the main two FPS games - COD and BF HAVE LOST THEIR IDENTITY.
I’m thoroughly disappointed
I still play only BF4 NOW... Destruction, BF3 TEAM TALK, All type of platform play (soldier, tank, helicopter, boat), specialisation creating dependency (running after the support guy.!!)... I'll sit here an wait.
This is y I have been on Tom Clancy Breakpoint....u can b more tactical on it with right ppl. U can limit ur HUD for a better immersion... although, not exactly a fan of the robots but I find more MilSim players there than on the recent BF games. I will say I started BF franchise with BF3. With that, I fell n love with BF series but it started to degrade when BF1 came out....BFV was remnants of BF then BF2042 just turned into COD....and I left COD because of BF. I want the old BF back. The true immersion and utilization of bullet drop... environmental damage.... just legit world immersion.
what master piece documentary constructive criticism well explained ...you have new + SUBSCRIBEER with LIKE
Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it! 😀
Easy subscribe. Beautifully said. I miss feeling like every time I start up battlefield I was ready for a new experience and to achieve something worth the grind while improving. Excellent video brother
What I love about BF4 and BF1 is that anyone can start now and still have massive fun just like the ones who played the game at launch. You nailed it with consistency, many games dont follow that principle in 2024 because they want to compete with Fortnite and COD.
I think BF7 wont be anywhere near like BF3 and BF4 and itll take a whole EA shakedown for Battfield to be king again.
Battlefield was the best because it evolved to be a perfect compromise of chaotic fun and tactical play. Although a lot didn't play it in a very co-op, objectives, team-based way, a lot did and that emphasis made it much better than CoD, etc. Along with good vehicle play, ithe core experience was simply much more complex, interesting and thoughtful than other shooters.
I've played every BF and loved them all, with each being an improvement overall until BF5, when EA decided to prioritise monetisation and try and cash in on the Battle Royale fad.
Then, although they advertised BF2042 using nostalgic imagery, they moved even further away from the core Battlefield experience, making it both Battle Royale _and_ Hero Shooter based.
EA just don't know or care what they are doing with the franchise. They have no interest in what the BF fanbase enjoy. They are more interested in trying to get a new, modern audience even at the expense of the large old audience.
I'm still playing BF1. Best BF (though I appreciate those that want modern warfare prefer BF4).
BF1 is the perfect compromise of accessibility for noobs and fun for experienced players. The skill gap wasn't large, but wasn't small. Skilled twitch players do well. More thoughtful tactical players do well. Lone wolves can do well, if skilled, but squad/team play has a clear advantage. Noobs don't get too badly pounded. The fun chaos and the skill sweat is balanced.
I have no hope for the franchise. Everything that EA have said about BF6 so far is even further again unlike the classic Battlefield experience.
True, MW 2019 was the last good one, now its rabbits vs ducks vs other whacky characters toy game, nothing military anymore, just money maker for Activision/Blizzard
You hit it on the head for call of duty, you can not play casually anymore because there is soo many sweats. even if we are ranked under 200 we get matched with people who are 900 and destroy us.
AGREED. This is exactly had I feel about these games. Finallly, someone that can say what's in my head.
God.. FKIN.. BLESS.. You're over here hammering the nail into the head like you're trying to forge The One Ring.
awesome video from new TH-camr from Brazil I hope your channel become a rocket and ative higher altitudes. Same idea on everything. Gain one more subscriber!
I always liked battlefields better than cod, 2042 was a fail smh. Hopefully next one will be good
titanfall movement works for titanfall. Other games just do a poor copy of it because of trend
I still play bf4 all the time, It is flawed but still the best modern battlefield.
It's a game I still want to go back to, the only thing stopping me is having not installed it on the newer consoles 🙂 so many good maps and a fun experience all round!
Mw2019 ground war was actually solid fun. The chunks they carved out of the WZ map were pretty symmetrical and it just led to some fun gameplay flow.
@@Moss_and_Such yeah, the infantry focused ones I enjoyed a lot, have some cool moments, didn't find the vehicle/infantry balance suited me as there's no teamwork incentive 😂
What a great video mate! Great points, total agreeable criticism. And in the end a love letter to the franchise and a cry for help to stop ruining it.
Honestly, I love BF5 it's fun and I find myself going back again and again to play it.
I started with bf2 and till bf1 I had the feeling that I am going to war and that I wanna win every round.
Great video. Nothing I disagree with.
this generation of devs are not really good, they all behind trends , people behaviors also made these devs that way
What's unusual is that you spelled Battlefield wrong. 😂
My go-to is Battlefield 4. The current DICE isn't capable of making a great Battlefield game. Much talent would need to be hired to change the situation.
for me it started with Desert Combat and peaked with 4. its just sad but great vid
I think we all want a good battlefield game it’s been way too long.
Dude! awesome work, thank you so much for this video.
about the server you explained..
'' when you start to find these servers you like you start to recognize certain players, perhaps you'll befriend them perhaps you'll get a rivalry, and those little things create those stories that make players so excited and so nostalgic for your game because they've got those memories that they attach to. and they just script that or make that happen without having these tools to allow the community to drive the experience of the game. ''
many of us BF players will def agree with this, those friends we made all the way, the countless moments and fondest memories will be with us forever.
For a up and coming channel, fantastic quality and information mate.
Whole heartedly agree, ohh I’d love to go back to bf3 days squading up with my friends.
Subbed 👍
@@lindsay9697 Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Cod just feels so lifeless and stale haven’t been a fan of cod since black ops 2.
Battlefield 1 is the best ever
It was awesome!
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag Is awesome*
ha, you did play warsaw as an outro, spot on.
bf is not bf without warsaw
For the point made around the 4:10 mark, this is why PS has a bit of an L when it comes to backwards compatibility compared to PC (because obviously PC wins this as there is no generation division) and Xbox, but to a lesser extent.
To even sweeten the deal Xbox game pass makes it easier as EA Play is bundled in at higher game pass tiers which allows for Battlefield 3 and onward to be installed and played on demand
@@beastmode1915 yeah ps has dropped the ball a bit, although I think PS3 BF3 servers were shut down years ago, if not they were pretty much dead because of no backwards compatibility 😞
I always find it funny when someone says "MW 2019 went back to what COD used to be" because as someone who's played COD quite a lot throughout my life and for many years, and as someone who goes back to play old COD Games all the time... MW 2019 is nothing like old COD. MW 2019 is what you remember old COD to be, not what it actually is. I also don't like this take because MW 2019 was clearly designed with the lowest skill player in mind and that makes the game far less fun and enjoyable than it could've been. These things also go for MWII ofc as well. Also, a big reason people are such tryhards now is because nowadays every game is infested with this SBMM or EOMM system, forcing everyone to play with others of the exact same skill level, making people want to tryhard to fight that horrid system. It's unfortunate, but it's an issue that's been plaguing MP Games for quite awhile now.
I agree with most of your points though, at least for BF. I don't feel COD has really ever been immersive, so i'm fine with movement being in that game, but other than a basic slide, I don't think movement really fits into the Battlefield style, vibe and game balance. BF was made to be a semi-realistic casual shooter, but COD was never really like that, it just didn't have movement, but it still had unrealistic stuff like perks, weapon camos, attachments that didn't change the look of your weapon, etc. where Battlefield went the extra mile to make the game feel more realistic and less casual and more immersive in it's design.
@@DeadSpacedOut Absolutely agree, for me it felt like my memory of the old games but brought up to modern standards. The campaign gripped me like original MW2 and the multiplayer felt awesome until people discovered slide cancels and then bounce house begins. The old bf's did have those immersive details, some hardcore games have rhem too but again it's nice to have that in a casual game
Finally someone addresses the main issue of battlefield and cod ! The movement of the characters! It’s so fast and over the top ! I can’t even relaxed my eyes! I’m from india and I’m console person i have to play with cross play on because i can not find any lobbies if turn it off and pc players are like aim bot and so fast aiming speed i just can’t stand a chance on a console in battlefield !!
And Squad and Harsh Doorstep is Walking simulators,
This video make my day fantastic. I love your commentary.
You hit right in target. Bf3 is best I don't wanna wasting any words.
@@GamingLifeBossSnake Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
We dont NEED a good battlefield game, we have them already! Go play BF4 while you still can
@@Ill06Taco those of us who want to play with friends on other platforms do unfortunately, and by the sounds of it, come the end of the year there'll be fewer options 😞
BF3 is the pinnacle in the overall series. 4 was the pinnacle on consoles. We wont get another BF game that good i believe.
Bad Company 2 had Great Destruction
I went through this while playing MW2019's ground war mode. Luckily I enjoyed BFV, especially after the Pacific theater was introduced. So I went and played that, and occasionally went back to BF3, BF4, BF1 and even Hardline. Nothing has really been able to capture the same magic as even the sub-par Battlefield games for me, unfortunately. As many problems as 2042 has, I still find it more enjoyable overall than any Call of Duty game that's come out in the past 12 years.
Bad company 2 was the goat
I agree on every point, except weapon attachments. While i agree the current min-max meta stuff needs to go away, i do love making my virtual gun "mine". Modern weapons have a lego-like aspect to them, and seeing that represented in the fps im playing is awesome. I wish i could have as many attachments as i want, and the only thing it would affect is my characters movement speed.
@@cpin1992 I do like it from the visual side it is fun to see all the parts fit together but also there's so many attachments I never use it is kind of a waste. Most players prioritise min ads and sprint out so the customisation gets lost anyway 😞
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag If attachments were mostly just eye candy then it's just an addition to the game and not a detractor in any way.
In warzone for example, I'll pick a foregrip that closely resembles the one I have on my real life rifle. The variety on offer is great. BUT, I know that I am probably negatively affecting my weapon stats, and I can't be bothered to take the sweaty approach to weapon customization because 1, The gun almost always looks stupid. 2, I'm an adult with little time to play, so I'm not going to spend time min-maxing my build and 3, no matter how I set my class up, the rest of the game is ruined by everything else you mentioned in this fantastic video.
Weapon customization is one aspect I love in an fps game. That gets ruined when there is also a min-max meta or a limit on attachments because of having to balance everything.
Devs should give players variety while keeping everything theme concurrent. Same with weapon skins and character skins.
You wouldn't want to see someone in BF1 running around with a Tommy gun equipped with a laser, LPVO, and telescopic stocks, while dressed like Santa Claus or the easter bunny.
I don't want to see a modern themed BF with no or very little attachments because that isn't representative of modern weapons. Still don't want to see tacticool Santa Claus here either.
Free me from my boredom yes
BF 1 all the way it has it all
only 346 subs seems a bit low for the quality of this content, lets make that one more
I cant say how much i loved the battlefield franchise, it was the game i grew up with and kept playing BF 4 for years even when newer games in the franchise were coming out. it just worked and whatever made it work is missing nowadays, i miss the countless days of playing siege of shangai domination hardcore 24/7 server.
i wholy agree with the points about twitche Esporty movement shooter fast paced ADHD dopamine mechanics and design making its way into games where it doesnt necessarily belong, that has a lot to do with why i dont enjoy most FPS games made nowadays despite loving them in the past with games like (old) R6S, battlefield and such
@@chost-059 Thanks, I appreciate it. I wasn't sure how the video would be received but it appears to have resonated with a group who wants games to be fun again 🙂
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag i believe its an increasingly common view from people born between 90's-early 2000's that grew up playing older style games that used to be unique and creative and most importantly made to be fun
Now a lot of us feel very discontent with the modern wannabe next eSporty game FPS
Operation harsh doorstop is amazing 😍
Bad company 3 when?
What a great video and its all so true!! Just watched the video without seeing how long it is, soon as the battlefield footage started I couldnt stop watching. We need a good battlefield!
You are solid man, you deserve more recognition, well said!
@@helcoat909 Thank you! 🙂
Nice video. Captures the quality and feels the gamers of this franchise were brought up with.
@@G4MESE7EN Thanks!
Sorry to be this nitpicky, but at 45:10 you say that Battlefield 2042 launcued without a scoreboard. This is particularly untrue. It did have a scoreboard, but it was confusing to find and a half-baked experimental version that didn't have any competitive implements.
@@Moonvive apologies for presenting incorrect information, I didn't start playing until nearly a year after launch, thank you for the correction 🙂
@TheGuyWithNoGamertag I played the Beta and at launch. The beta was actually less buggy than launch surprisingly 💀
Just do the same shi like in BF2-BF3-BF4
Bad Company 2 had Great Gameplay and Destructible environments
Great video man
I love the hunt showdown mention! By far one of the most immersive games I played, makes you feel like your actually in the swamp
@@CptTomGaming couldn't agree more and the new map looks awesome!
@@TheGuyWithNoGamertag for sure! Will definitely be playing when it drops
hell let loose
Very good video
Play Squad
i really hopeDICE got their shit together and listened to all the feedback they got the last 5+ years. I wish the next BF would be another GOATed BF like BC2 & BF3 were🙌
Amazing video btw. this deserves so much more views!
Very highly doubt it. EA owns them by the collar.
Great video, you havr expressed in the video what i've been thinking about for a long time. Keep up the good work!
@@Shadowstg thanks 🙂
I miss BF3 so much. I started playing playing Battlebit Remasterd and love it cause it's so simple but sadly the devs are now trying to ruin it, they are trying to make a game for the casuals that will play the game for a week after update, then go back to their AAA titles like COD and Fortnite, you're not going to win those people over!!!! stop trying to, make a game for the fans. Battlebit is proof that and old school BF game will work, no hero, just classes with good teamwork, can move fast or slow. It really has "only in battlefield" moments. I miss those days so much
couldnt listen to this guy cuz oz of the accent
😂
It may sound cringe, but as someone that grew up with all of the originals like Battlefield 1942, BFBC2, etc. as well as playing every call of duty as it came out- this is genuinely depressing. What has the world come to? Where is the identity in anything? Corporate slop.
I can't express how much i agree with you in Every Single Point you said! Thanks for this video
Thanks, it took a while for me to compile my thoughts on issues with modern fps games and it appears to be resonating with more people than I thought!
I will never play battle royals games and to this date battlefield 2042 is the only shooter with the game loop I enjoy. Close to 2500 hours and I still enjoy it. There’s no other game filling that niche style so I will play it till the next one comes out. Will forever hate Fortnite and what it did to the industry. Insane the new CoD has a Nicky Minaj skin. Battlefield didn’t became bad. The gamers played Fortnite…
Battlefield 2042… the one battlefield game I can get over 30 kills in lol. That’s how you know something is wrong
There was bunny hopping in bf2. I hate when people think this game should be more mil sim when it was never
Comments here still dont get it. They keep complaining about DIce. The problem is not DIce. The problem is Fortnite, apex legends, warzone
I quit playing Battle field on BF4.
those of us who have made friends all over the world still want games we can play together.
Every point was spot on. I loved the 2010 era battlefields and no game has matched the feel and vibe yet. I still love my movement based shooters like apex but to go back to this lost style would be so much appreciated. I hope someone at dice watches this video.
Unfortunately Dice and EA can no longer deliver. They moved away from the classic algorithm to chase something new and they seem like their doubling down. BF 2,3,4 and Bad Company series were the good hits they'll never get back. BF1 was good but wasn't the game that captured and V was good-ish over time.