@@svenhoevenaars8109 Why would he? He would have to be 100% sure the ball was in and also would have to let 2 Break Points go just because others didn't do their job. I mean, you could argue he could call it in himself, but I wouldnt go as fair as calling him unfair or undeservedly winning. In the end he earned the victory.
@@markmauk8231 bullshit , if he would have honor he would be honest and tell the empire that the ball was in... he saw it for sure no doubt the only crazy person was the umpire... he earned nothing just had luck , hops he get injured soon
@@prashantkumarchoudhary6124 Tennis is pretty far ahead in these matters with cricket being the best. If you said football, then you would have a point.
Khachanov probably wouldn't have complained so much if not for that first overrule. That was well inside the line, how can the umpire possibly call that out?
@@mikerzisu9508 Bro, he's a professional umpire at ATP level and he had line umpires to check it for him. That's no mistake, that's being completely dumb and blind...
@@mikerzisu9508 no...just no...as a tennis player myself....its totally stupid, this is not a mistake...like this far in, if you See that wrong you shouldnt be an umpire ...this is just stupidity
it's insane how much 'power' an umpire has. Calling the supervisor doesnt help either, they're just as useless. There needs to be some level of accountability
Easier said than done. Umpires make mistakes given the limitation, and on average everyone should be screwed equally if unbiased and ATP probably keeps a close eye on the umpires biases. Without technology, I'd say it's already the best system without it become a drama show.
@@saptarshibhattacharya2505 This umpire made one clear mistake, all the others are too close to call and they did could be correct calls. If anything the Umpire handled it well given how upset Karen got. I doubt he's in any trouble whatsoever. All umpires have made similar mistakes during a match.
This all could have been avoided with hawk-eye. Not sure why it wasn’t there. Umpires are good for looking on player’s behaviors and reading the scores, that’s all. The game is played now on baselines and humans are not good for close calls.
@@preddy09 The one that gave 8 to 7 to Evans was 100% an absolutely correct (non) call by the umpire. It could have been out but it wasn't "clearly out". Even if it was out but not clearly out, the umpire shouldn't overrule. Whether the linesperson was correct is a separate question.
It's a joke that Evans actually accepted that first point of controversy. A joke. As a player, you know that ball is in by a mile. There is no way I could accept a point like that.
Evans is just piling on the umpire because he knows he's a terrible umpire. But honestly, Evans must have noticed the first one. Should have given the point to Kachanov.
Players HAVE to stick together when witnessing such egregious errors. Giving your opponent the deserved point and at the same time embarrassing the umpire is a must EVERY TIME….
In case of first call, Evans was right in front of the ball. He knew the ball was in. But he was silent. And with that call Evans started douting Umpires calls. I think Evans should have shown some sportsmanship here.
The first one was lingering the whole way through, the other calls were super close but the fact he called the first out just makes you doubt every call now hence the outburst.
Umpire is wrong 100% on first call. - not just the call but for making the call. Their guideline is ONLY if you CLEARLY see the ball different from the lines person call. Now, at the far baseline area with whats called 'parrallax error'..meaning from the angle of viewing of the position of the umpire chair - there is distortion. That is why umpires are told to be very very careful if over ruling anything in the baseline area.
Junior? Try ITF or even Challenger. Umpires in ITF tournaments are either blind or match fixing half the time but have complete power. And Challenger umpires are also unreliable as hell and the line judges aren't great
@@punpun2773 Basically when playing those tournaments you have to imagine playing with your opponent having slightly smaller court and you have slightly bigger court. Your hits need to be more accurate and your court coverage need to be really good. Definitely not easy, it's tough. But hey, if you are not top players you can't be choosers and no one is forcing you to play it.
Lol it’s hard to believe I played so many years of competition making our own calls lol. But, there was only certain people that made really bad calls, and you could get a roving umpire to come stand at your court if you had big problems.
For an umpire to act out of his own way to call 'out' that line umpires weren't even calling must mean that they must be very sure that the ball is indeed 'out'. This is not a simple mistake anymore and surely there must be some form of accountability for blunders of this degree? If that sounds too subjective, maybe we could reform the rules so that umpires are not the final decisionmakers or popularize a video review feature (like the Kecmanovic ball touch drama against Davidovich Fokina) or, simply enough, provide hawkeyes in every venue for ATP250 tournaments and above?
The first one was in and kachanov was right but after that I think kachanov made his mind that the umpire was against him so he questioned the umpire on every close call. And he lost at the end
One incorrect call doesn't get you fired. Others looked fine. No human is gonna be 100% accurate. If that's your standard, I can't see how you play or watch any sport.
@Mr Beast ✔ U mad? One mistake is one mistake, nothing more, and it wasnt even a crucial point. Tennis is a head game, in this case Kachanov lost his mind.
@Mr Beast ✔ I watch a lot of tennis, i mean..a lot...and in this clip there is ONE mistake, other calls were correct. The point wasnt crucial, it wasnt a break, if i remember correctly Kachanov was on advantage (clearly without the mistake he would have won the game, but any mistake cause a disadvantage) . The mistake was clear, but any human can make such mistakes. U hate that umpire, or is hated by players? That's not the point in judging the events in this video...here I see Kachanov loosing his mind for a (clear) mistake by a umpire, loosing focus and losing the match, and the only person to blame is himself.
Why even have an umpire? Most of them are grandparents…. And yeah, why have lines people? That was just a joke. It angers me to my core. I feel sorry for the players robbed by these old people who can’t see 10 feet in front of them. If there is no hawk eye. I would not play. It’s clear he was drunk …. That umpire needs to retire he’s either crooked or his eyes are done. Like a drivers license they should have to go every year to have their eyes checked.
The ones after the first call were very close, I can understand. However, a chair umpire at the ATP tour simply cannot make a mistake like he made with the first call. Terrible call.
Umpires should be taken off all calls completely. Technology has the answer. The only thing an umpire needs to do is call players for behaviour. They can be paid less too.
At the end, Khachanov loses the game on its own in my opinion. Of course, I think everyone agree after the slow-mo replay, that the ball was clearly in. At the other situations, well it was hard to make a clear call by watching the replay, because they are really close, but in the end, I would agree on the chair umpire to let the call stand. What I really want to mention is not the action of the chair umpire, how definitely argued not that well, but in the end, Khachanovs attitude was the reason, why he loses the game. In the first conversation, he said to the chair umpire, that he should trust the line umpires, because they are sitting in a better position . In the following discussions, he just scream, why the chair umpire aren’t overruling this decisions. To bring it on point, Khachanov has no clear opinion, he just wants the calls in his favor. Understandable for each tennis player, but at the end, there are (if you have no working hawk eye on the field) calls for and against you, probably at least two for and against you. But at the end you always have the chance to win with your strength on court. You play often over 100 points in a match, so you have a lot of chances to win it on your own. And the set break discussion was hilarious. It’s clearly mentioned in the Code, that the player can’t leave the court without asking the umpire (because their is always one of the line umpires going with them.) So his action in the set break was just childish and probably this behavior was part of this lose. Of course, you can criticize the chair umpire or the line umpires, even if you are spectator like we are, but to say especially in this case, the umpire loses the game of Khachanov, that’s just unfair. I mean, as I mentioned before, I am not sure at the calls after the first one, and I say this even after I watched the slow motion. Think about it, to be in a situation where a ball will come with a lot of speed, you can just see that ball one time and you have to decide. Of course it’s their job, but if you put the weight of decision on a human, faults are possible. On umpires side, but also on players side. :)
When he is in umpire position he is responsible for everything. Umpire made him so frustrated that he lost his cool, its easier to say he should be able to get through as a player but in reality it's really hard.
I would like to see this situation with Novak or Kyrgios, both wouldn't take any shit from this umpire, don't tell me that Karen's action was childish, this umpire calls "out" even for Evans shot, and was so clear that the ball was in, also the other shots, even commentary person noticed it, I know it's not easy for umpire but don't cry for this umpire guy that he has no condition to be a ATP umpire at all, 🤨
That first one was so outrageous that Evans should have offered to replay the point. It was 6 inches inside the line. The others were close and this just got carried away.
policy should change....supervisors should become more useful and not sleep on every match but watch it carefully and have capacity to overrule a decision from an umpire when necessary
Bad line calls happen, everyone makes mistakes. But when the chair umpire over rules a ball that’s almost a foot inside the line………………………………dude needs a coffee or glasses
All ATP tour tournaments should have hawk eye. 2021 people, let the technology work for us. The umpire's first call was an absolute joke, ball was 20cm inside the court.
imagine how well a real sportsman could have deescalated that first big mistake by just saying it was in. Found more often in tabletennis that gift. timo boll for example.
Can someone explain me what happened here 1:15? Why did Karen stop? Was it because the previous stroke of Evans was actually an out? It's just strange to me that Karen saw it and still stroke it back to Evans I'm a newbie in tennis)
I think the shot by evans was out (so Karen was expecting the call for ball to be out so just naturally returned the ball and then stopped as soon as he realised the call for the ball out wasn't coming)
I remember this match, I had a bet on Khachanov and was furious with those calls, I think that first one definitely set the tone and eventually cost him the match, even beyond those calls it ruined his mental state which is even worse.
Give all your money to organisators... It is not as cheap as get some random line judges. On the other side, every tournament on challenger tour... 250 +.. Needs the hawkeye. Maybe also 125's..
The umpire just does not give a shit. Just look at his body language. The first one is one of the worst calls I've seen. He just looks tired of his job. xD
This is a classic example of how one bad call can just completely unravel a player. That first overrule was awful...one of the worst I have seen. But the rest were very close, and the one where Karen freaked out on the one that led to set point, looked in to me. But because of that first bad overrule...Karen thinks EVERY close call after that is not only incorrectly called...but WAY in or out. This is the lack of mental toughness that the top players contrarily have.
I wish there was either Krygios, Benoitt or Fognini in there.. it would have been so much fun.. Krygios would have just walked out.. if umpire called him back.. 'f off' is my expectation.. it may be better.. Karen is a gentleman..
4:18 the ball is in and the line man is correct. Only the first one is well in but the umpire called it out, this happens to everyone if your hit the ball too hard.
The bigger problem here is Dan Evans who was happy to benefit from that first call, then tries to suck up to the umpire later on. That's some seriously weak stuff.
this is why hawkeye line call should be a standard. make it so that hawkeye makes every call. they have done this at a few tournies and it has worked like a charm. I don't understand why they refuse to change this.
The last ones were close, but that first overcall might be one of the biggest mistakes I’ve ever seen from an umpire
Check out the Williams Capriatti match at the US Open. Horrible calls.
I mean that first one is so far in…
And every other close call after just made K think of that one
If evans was a bit fair then he just would have said that the Ball was in. Definitely didnt deserve to win
@@svenhoevenaars8109 Why would he? He would have to be 100% sure the ball was in and also would have to let 2 Break Points go just because others didn't do their job.
I mean, you could argue he could call it in himself, but I wouldnt go as fair as calling him unfair or undeservedly winning.
In the end he earned the victory.
@@markmauk8231 bullshit , if he would have honor he would be honest and tell the empire that the ball was in... he saw it for sure no doubt the only crazy person was the umpire... he earned nothing just had luck , hops he get injured soon
Exactly.
There is no reason any tournament at a 250 level and above shouldn't have hawkeye.
especially in hard court
Tennis always baffles me. All sports are making sure that no wrong calls are made. But Tennis has other ideas :)
Tennis was the first game with hawkeye. Yet the football goal line technology and volleyball challenges are more advanced.
@@prashantkumarchoudhary6124 Tennis is pretty far ahead in these matters with cricket being the best. If you said football, then you would have a point.
There are other line calling technologies. And better ones than Hawkeye.
Umpire looks like he’s napping through the match
🤣
Khachanov probably wouldn't have complained so much if not for that first overrule. That was well inside the line, how can the umpire possibly call that out?
Everyone makes mistakes
He might have a bet on Evans ...
@@mikerzisu9508 Bro, he's a professional umpire at ATP level and he had line umpires to check it for him. That's no mistake, that's being completely dumb and blind...
@@g_webb21 oh it was a horrible call, don't get me wrong. One of the worst I have seen. But have seen many terrible calls over the years, it happens
@@mikerzisu9508 no...just no...as a tennis player myself....its totally stupid, this is not a mistake...like this far in, if you See that wrong you shouldnt be an umpire ...this is just stupidity
Kyrgious would have walked out of court right away when that first ball was called out
Yeah.. Cuz he's soft.
"Come on bro, seriously bro, that ball was far in bro. See you online bro, I'll crush you there, bro".
I mean, when there's obvious cheating-why participate. No one is that bad, it's cheating
I don't even want to imagine... 😂
The logical thing to do is walk out, Kyrgios or whomever else is being cheated on.
it's insane how much 'power' an umpire has. Calling the supervisor doesnt help either, they're just as useless. There needs to be some level of accountability
Easier said than done. Umpires make mistakes given the limitation, and on average everyone should be screwed equally if unbiased and ATP probably keeps a close eye on the umpires biases. Without technology, I'd say it's already the best system without it become a drama show.
There is accountability, just not during the match. I don't think you're going to see this umpire on atp tours soon
@@saptarshibhattacharya2505 This umpire made one clear mistake, all the others are too close to call and they did could be correct calls. If anything the Umpire handled it well given how upset Karen got. I doubt he's in any trouble whatsoever. All umpires have made similar mistakes during a match.
This all could have been avoided with hawk-eye. Not sure why it wasn’t there. Umpires are good for looking on player’s behaviors and reading the scores, that’s all. The game is played now on baselines and humans are not good for close calls.
@@preddy09 The one that gave 8 to 7 to Evans was 100% an absolutely correct (non) call by the umpire. It could have been out but it wasn't "clearly out". Even if it was out but not clearly out, the umpire shouldn't overrule. Whether the linesperson was correct is a separate question.
It's a joke that Evans actually accepted that first point of controversy. A joke. As a player, you know that ball is in by a mile. There is no way I could accept a point like that.
Evans is a typical Brit
@@sawgames8623I’m a Brit and would never do it so 😭
Evans had no right to get mad at the 2:26 call. The fact that he didn't give Kachanov that first point is appalling
Yeah was glad that he got destroyed at the US open
Evans is just piling on the umpire because he knows he's a terrible umpire.
But honestly, Evans must have noticed the first one. Should have given the point to Kachanov.
Evans is a typical unsportsmanlike Brit
Players HAVE to stick together when witnessing such egregious errors. Giving your opponent the deserved point and at the same time embarrassing the umpire is a must EVERY TIME….
@@sawgames8623 That’s very rude . The brits are not unsportsmanlike. Why would you concede a point unless you were certain ?
I mean the first overrule is an absolute travesty
In case of first call, Evans was right in front of the ball. He knew the ball was in. But he was silent.
And with that call Evans started douting Umpires calls.
I think Evans should have shown some sportsmanship here.
Not surprising he wasn’t being sportsmanlike. There is something about Evans which I dislike.
Evans is an asswipe for not giving that point to Kachanov.
He's a white privilege
@@Mike-jv9clhe is English, they all are the same
The first one was lingering the whole way through, the other calls were super close but the fact he called the first out just makes you doubt every call now hence the outburst.
It looks like only the 1st one was incorrect
What a disgusting cheater is Evans. The first one was so much in and he knew it, he should have given the point to Karen.
Umpire is wrong 100% on first call. - not just the call but for making the call. Their guideline is ONLY if you CLEARLY see the ball different from the lines person call. Now, at the far baseline area with whats called 'parrallax error'..meaning from the angle of viewing of the position of the umpire chair - there is distortion. That is why umpires are told to be very very careful if over ruling anything in the baseline area.
The fact that first one was so wrong made the whole event interesting. Playing ATP tournament without Hawykee is a joke.
Now imagine a junior tournament where players have to make their own calls...
It’s rough 🤣🤣🤣
Junior? Try ITF or even Challenger. Umpires in ITF tournaments are either blind or match fixing half the time but have complete power. And Challenger umpires are also unreliable as hell and the line judges aren't great
@@punpun2773 Basically when playing those tournaments you have to imagine playing with your opponent having slightly smaller court and you have slightly bigger court. Your hits need to be more accurate and your court coverage need to be really good. Definitely not easy, it's tough. But hey, if you are not top players you can't be choosers and no one is forcing you to play it.
Lol it’s hard to believe I played so many years of competition making our own calls lol. But, there was only certain people that made really bad calls, and you could get a roving umpire to come stand at your court if you had big problems.
For an umpire to act out of his own way to call 'out' that line umpires weren't even calling must mean that they must be very sure that the ball is indeed 'out'. This is not a simple mistake anymore and surely there must be some form of accountability for blunders of this degree? If that sounds too subjective, maybe we could reform the rules so that umpires are not the final decisionmakers or popularize a video review feature (like the Kecmanovic ball touch drama against Davidovich Fokina) or, simply enough, provide hawkeyes in every venue for ATP250 tournaments and above?
just the first one was terrible. everything else was close to call but this empire behaves slow as hell lol
dude's drunk as phuq! Khach was right. lol
I’ve never seen Karen that angry before.
The first one was in and kachanov was right but after that I think kachanov made his mind that the umpire was against him so he questioned the umpire on every close call. And he lost at the end
He lost because he was fighting against two opponents, one sitting in a chair
It was a robbery
@@yannickdrmda5295 just on the firts overule
3 opponents. 3rd one being himself. First was a bad bad call, but should not let the call lead to his self capitulation.
Yup. This was a Kyrgios style meltdown where 1 mistake or any incident costs him the match because he can't get over it
This is absolute insanity. There shouldn't be any tournaments without Hawkeye..
Wow!!! It is incredible this umpire is still working at the ATP.
Why?
One incorrect call doesn't get you fired. Others looked fine. No human is gonna be 100% accurate. If that's your standard, I can't see how you play or watch any sport.
@@kaza2845 but he's one of the worst umpires in the world of professional tennis I mean he didn't make one mistake or two but dozens.
All the other calls were close, but the chair umpire overruling the first call when it was actually well in, definitely caused all of the aftermath
Man if this was nick the umpire would've lost an eye or something
I would have applauded that. This umpire is BOUGHT OUT by sports gambling web sites. It's clear he's corrupt
Karen needs to talk to the manager!
The first one didn't even hit the line it was so far in. The second one was in too though
Can we know if they went and watched the match the day after? :)
Strange that "cocain Evans" not saying that it was in.
Haha omg
0:14 watch at 0.25 speed. It's very clearly IN.
That ump looks half dead.
Khachanov was cheated out of that match
Just in first overrule
Yes this was his match. Sorry for Kachanov 😔
For what? For one mistake? The other balls were so close that u cant say if theyre in or out. Kachanov lost his mind and lost for what a am seeing.
@Mr Beast ✔ U mad? One mistake is one mistake, nothing more, and it wasnt even a crucial point. Tennis is a head game, in this case Kachanov lost his mind.
@Mr Beast ✔ I watch a lot of tennis, i mean..a lot...and in this clip there is ONE mistake, other calls were correct. The point wasnt crucial, it wasnt a break, if i remember correctly Kachanov was on advantage (clearly without the mistake he would have won the game, but any mistake cause a disadvantage) . The mistake was clear, but any human can make such mistakes. U hate that umpire, or is hated by players? That's not the point in judging the events in this video...here I see Kachanov loosing his mind for a (clear) mistake by a umpire, loosing focus and losing the match, and the only person to blame is himself.
I lold when the umire called Kachanov a Karen. Then I remembered that is his real name hah.
Yes, because that's a very popular Armenian name, stupid.
Terrible eyes on that umpire. Terrible. He should NOT be making calls.
5:45 where do you think I'm going? To the crowd? 🤣😂
Why even have an umpire? Most of them are grandparents…. And yeah, why have lines people? That was just a joke. It angers me to my core. I feel sorry for the players robbed by these old people who can’t see 10 feet in front of them. If there is no hawk eye. I would not play. It’s clear he was drunk …. That umpire needs to retire he’s either crooked or his eyes are done.
Like a drivers license they should have to go every year to have their eyes checked.
The ones after the first call were very close, I can understand.
However, a chair umpire at the ATP tour simply cannot make a mistake like he made with the first call. Terrible call.
Umpires should be taken off all calls completely. Technology has the answer. The only thing an umpire needs to do is call players for behaviour. They can be paid less too.
Worst umpire ever.....
By far and beyond
At the end, Khachanov loses the game on its own in my opinion.
Of course, I think everyone agree after the slow-mo replay, that the ball was clearly in. At the other situations, well it was hard to make a clear call by watching the replay, because they are really close, but in the end, I would agree on the chair umpire to let the call stand.
What I really want to mention is not the action of the chair umpire, how definitely argued not that well, but in the end, Khachanovs attitude was the reason, why he loses the game.
In the first conversation, he said to the chair umpire, that he should trust the line umpires, because they are sitting in a better position . In the following discussions, he just scream, why the chair umpire aren’t overruling this decisions. To bring it on point, Khachanov has no clear opinion, he just wants the calls in his favor. Understandable for each tennis player, but at the end, there are (if you have no working hawk eye on the field) calls for and against you, probably at least two for and against you. But at the end you always have the chance to win with your strength on court. You play often over 100 points in a match, so you have a lot of chances to win it on your own.
And the set break discussion was hilarious. It’s clearly mentioned in the Code, that the player can’t leave the court without asking the umpire (because their is always one of the line umpires going with them.) So his action in the set break was just childish and probably this behavior was part of this lose.
Of course, you can criticize the chair umpire or the line umpires, even if you are spectator like we are, but to say especially in this case, the umpire loses the game of Khachanov, that’s just unfair. I mean, as I mentioned before, I am not sure at the calls after the first one, and I say this even after I watched the slow motion. Think about it, to be in a situation where a ball will come with a lot of speed, you can just see that ball one time and you have to decide. Of course it’s their job, but if you put the weight of decision on a human, faults are possible. On umpires side, but also on players side. :)
Finally an unbiased comments that say it all and understand how things work. Thank you
When he is in umpire position he is responsible for everything. Umpire made him so frustrated that he lost his cool, its easier to say he should be able to get through as a player but in reality it's really hard.
I would like to see this situation with Novak or Kyrgios, both wouldn't take any shit from this umpire, don't tell me that Karen's action was childish, this umpire calls "out" even for Evans shot, and was so clear that the ball was in, also the other shots, even commentary person noticed it, I know it's not easy for umpire but don't cry for this umpire guy that he has no condition to be a ATP umpire at all, 🤨
That first one was so outrageous that Evans should have offered to replay the point. It was 6 inches inside the line. The others were close and this just got carried away.
Umpire(s) needs to be investigated too. If they need sacking then so be it! The first call was way in btw.
No wonder they introduced the automatic call system. Abhorrent officiating all around. All involved should of been sacked on the spot.
policy should change....supervisors should become more useful and not sleep on every match but watch it carefully and have capacity to overrule a decision from an umpire when necessary
Bad line calls happen, everyone makes mistakes. But when the chair umpire over rules a ball that’s almost a foot inside the line………………………………dude needs a coffee or glasses
True!!!!
All ATP tour tournaments should have hawk eye. 2021 people, let the technology work for us. The umpire's first call was an absolute joke, ball was 20cm inside the court.
Ok, the ref was really bad that day, but Evans? He and sportsmanship are just two ships passing in the night.
That guy “Evans” is disgusting, he could’ve asked to replay the point, but he just took it, horrible sportsmanship.
Those line umpire and all the umpire is this match is corrupt
most definitely. Someone in his family must have put a gamble on Evans winning
Umpire haven't got a clue
imagine how well a real sportsman could have deescalated that first big mistake by just saying it was in. Found more often in tabletennis that gift. timo boll for example.
Can someone explain why they don’t have Hawkeye?
They're being cheapskates lol
Never got calls like that even when we made our own calls in itf and challengers lol. You can tell that ump is a plug from a mile away though.
His golden badge should be revoked
Can someone explain me what happened here 1:15? Why did Karen stop? Was it because the previous stroke of Evans was actually an out? It's just strange to me that Karen saw it and still stroke it back to Evans
I'm a newbie in tennis)
I think the shot by evans was out (so Karen was expecting the call for ball to be out so just naturally returned the ball and then stopped as soon as he realised the call for the ball out wasn't coming)
@@connorm4274 tysm, that's exactly what I was thinking!
I remember this match, I had a bet on Khachanov and was furious with those calls, I think that first one definitely set the tone and eventually cost him the match, even beyond those calls it ruined his mental state which is even worse.
Umpire had a bet too though. Or an immediate member of his family.
Shame on these umpiring
If I was khachanov I think I would’ve walked off the court
Umpire :: hey dude hv gat some vodka under my nose mask...
Khachanov :: u gotta gimme some too
Umpire: I’m out
Khachanov: like THIS OUT???!!!!
I agree. After watching that, umpire should have been breathe tested at the end of that match
yeah i wuold walk off the court and never come back
0:46 haha lately have noticed tennis commentators have a good sense of humour
Man, I felt the despair from Khachanov. This umpire is a joke.
What the song name after second set?
The umpire surely was on drugs.
My question is, why doesn't Khachanov challenge any of these?
The really really bad thing about all of this especially the first ball is the EPIC class that Evans showed. He was in front of the first ball.
2021 and some tournaments still don't have hawk-eye technology :DD
It’s not a cheap technology
Give all your money to organisators... It is not as cheap as get some random line judges.
On the other side, every tournament on challenger tour... 250 +.. Needs the hawkeye. Maybe also 125's..
That umpire was complete garbage. Hope he never calls any other match.
do they not have vra in tennis?
Why wasnt hawkeye available ?
The umpire just does not give a shit. Just look at his body language. The first one is one of the worst calls I've seen. He just looks tired of his job. xD
bro that first overrule was literally in the blue
This is a classic example of how one bad call can just completely unravel a player. That first overrule was awful...one of the worst I have seen. But the rest were very close, and the one where Karen freaked out on the one that led to set point, looked in to me. But because of that first bad overrule...Karen thinks EVERY close call after that is not only incorrectly called...but WAY in or out. This is the lack of mental toughness that the top players contrarily have.
I wish there was either Krygios, Benoitt or Fognini in there.. it would have been so much fun.. Krygios would have just walked out.. if umpire called him back.. 'f off' is my expectation.. it may be better.. Karen is a gentleman..
The first call is fail of the year so far
Evans didn't have quite guts to say it was not "like this out", but very well inside
The empire was wrong and knew it!
Omg not even remotely close, 100% in. What a crook umpire. F that guy, fire him
UMPIRE RUINED THE MATCH
They should review the umpires decision after every match, and every egregious call like this, they should fine the umpires.
Evans Was the problem… zero gentleman….he had to call in
If this happened to me, I would piss the court and walk out 😂😂
ridiculous that umpire
and now hes in the uso semis, kings win
Empire is worst. Looks like he is so agitated.
Umpire wanted him to loose.
Most definitely. Beyond any doubt whatsoever!! It's quite repulsive
These umpires need to punished
You can speak to yourself 😂
Fuc...bad umpires. The frustation is too much.
4:18 the ball is in and the line man is correct. Only the first one is well in but the umpire called it out, this happens to everyone if your hit the ball too hard.
No, it never happened to others considering that the ball was 10cm in. No umpire ever made such a terrible mistake.
I saw that match. Umpire influenced the result, in that case. Definitely
what was the result of that match? who won??
Evans
The bigger problem here is Dan Evans who was happy to benefit from that first call, then tries to suck up to the umpire later on. That's some seriously weak stuff.
this is why hawkeye line call should be a standard. make it so that hawkeye makes every call. they have done this at a few tournies and it has worked like a charm. I don't understand why they refuse to change this.
Why dont they have hawk eye?
if i was a chair umpire, i would never overrule a call.
Now we all can see why top players skip all that low-tier events without hawk-eye.
nope, not because of that. Too few ATP points, too little money are the real reasons.
Where is a fcking replay?
So who won this match?
Dude I would’ve quit after the first mistake that was bullshit