Did you mean to say this> "The Gregorian reform was never purported to bring the calendar in line with the Julian calendar as it had existed at the time of its institution in 45 BC, but as it had existed in 325 AD, the time of the Council of Nicaea, which had established a method for determining the date of Easter Sunday by fixing the vernal equinox on March 21 in the Julian calendar. By 1582, the astronomical equinox was occurring on March 10 in the Julian calendar, but Easter was still being calculated from a nominal equinox on March 21. In 45 BC the astronomical vernal equinox took place around March 23. Illig's "three missing centuries" thus correspond to the 369 years between the institution of the Julian calendar in 45 BC, and the fixing of the Easter Date at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD." You didn't exactly say that, did you?... lol
It would be more like 800 according to Fomenko. where Rome, Greece and middle age are contemporaneous and much closer to us as they added almost a century give the illusion the Church existed for a 1000 years more.
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 The most easiest and clearest answer why all religions are false is: ALL RELIGIOUS SOULS LIVE IN BABYLON. CHRIST SAYS: Revelation 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. Muslims live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. Hindus live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. new agers live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. Atheists live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. Ignorats live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. Satanists live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. Catholics live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins. Christians = souls who are bible believers and obeyers, live being out from the Babylon and expose her wicked deeds. Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. James 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. James 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? 2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates? Without the needed works, how can soul EXAMINE themselves and to see that they to be in Faith? And if only FAITH is needed and not the doing of the WILL OF GOD (WORKS), then why there be only FEW who find the NARROW ROAD TO LIFE? Why many perish, if many say they have faith? Matthew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Matthew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
@@theharshtruthoutthere Yeah I don't do compilations since the 80ies, I do synthesis at my age. Jesus's aggregate of decisions and teachings gives you the bearing of a moral compass you ought to follow, if you don't, you fall. If you read the bible and have to warp the meaning of things to make it suit said bearing with rationalisation, you might want to remember you were warned about the wolf in sheep's clothes. So when the Jewish scholar tells you: you do not understand the Torah, what it means and what it represents in conjunction to the NT, they mean it. And you better believe it because it's their book, not yours.
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 GOD send a COMFORTER who through whom we shall have wisdom and UNDERSTADNING about heavenly thinks. Believe no man, be they Jews or gentiles. BELEIVE AND TRUST ONLY GOD. In our time, both the JEWS AND THE GENTLES CAN GET SAVED.
I have some. I took them while I was on my immortal journey to the west and happened to see some weird looking people dressed in armor build some shit. Idk why but apparently it's still here today so I had to go back and take a photo. Of course, I will not give my precious photos to anyone so dont bother asking. Also, I am the reason Lord Nobunaga died and why the Long Dinasty ceased to exist, I just wanted to take some pictures and they treated me like a lunatic
@Fabio Kun I took some selfies with the likes of Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, and even Adam and Eve which I kept in a photo album at the library of Alexandria. No you can’t see them as I was in my awkward teen phase in those pictures and I looked really bad at them, so I just decided to burn the whole library down to avoid further embarrassment
As an undying being cursed to perpetually live, robbed of the blessing of death, I can agree that it was quite a mindfuck when everyone said it was 912,one day after New Years on 613
As a german history student I'd like to raise an objection about Heribert Illig being referred to as a historian. Heribert Illig never acquired any credentials that would allow him to claim to be a historian. The only thing he ever studied are germanistics which is the study of german language and literature. He's about as qualified to be a historian as PETA is to run an animal shelter.
Thanks for this comment, I never found that info in my quick research on the subject. Then again since I don't speak German it made a lot of sources unusable for me. Makes the whole thing even funnier if ya think about it.
@@Huggbees Hey Hugbees, great video. Love when your videos are both informative and humorous at the same time. I remember you said in a podcast that you were planning to release more informative videos at one point.
I just took a class about the Middle Ages in uni, so I though he was going to talk about how our modern perception of the period we consider to be the middle ages is not real, and discuss the reality of what went on during that time. But no, its quite literally about some guy with no credentials theorizing about how those years literally just didn't happen, lmao.
Yeah, that's what I figured too but knowing Huggbees I knew there was gonna be some wild twist... still a bit surprised at quite how wild that twist was though
@@Rakkoonn with enough google scholars you can be a master at anything. But then again you think the moon landing happen? I don't even believe the moon is real. What I'm getting at, some people are just crazy or just to far out there.
You failing the translation then just forgetting about it is the best joke I’ve seen you do. Maybe it’s just my sense of humor, but I haven’t laughed this hard about something in a while. Thank you
@@deangulberry1876 Though, how is it you think that pointing out one person's lack of credibility means that they "blindly" accept whatever somebody else says anyway? You mean people can't just be wrong or ill-fit as an authority on a subject, and that not believing them isn't part of some bias or agenda?
I can personally say that those years did not happen, I was born in the year 68,230 BC, and I personally flipped my fancy new "Gregorian" calendar from December, 613 to January 912. Upon seeing this strange loss of 298 years, I proclaimed "1984". I held onto this until I met the prestigious author George Orwell, whom I told of my experience. George later thanked me for being the inspiration for his phenomenal novel "1984", a commentary on liberal wokeness that Orwell predicted would happen around the year 2020.
Does Huggbees exist when a video isn't playing? No. The answer is no. He goes to the same place your parents go when they cover their faces with their hands. It's so funny when they come back! It's magic!
honestly this has always been my favorite conspiracy theory because the theory is literally just saying that something happen. we have more proof that it did happen but this theory just goes “nu uh that isn’t real” to every answer.
@@cabobo1600 Not all of them, but most of them. Saying that the government is doing this spooky experiment or other is probably fine, but adding on Aliens is just too goofy. Same here, this is literally just One Piece "Void Century" but without the god-like beings who could actually pull it off.
Heribert Illig doesn't have any sort of higher education in history or any formation with a historian, you can't call him a historian. He just read some books and made up his revisionism.
@@RomanumChristum oh I know I just think he is giving more credit than its due by keeping calling him a historian, Huggbees could even had dug deeper in the wound by mentioning that Illig actually just called himself a "real historian" and doesn't have a degree, because that's what happened. Illig doesn't even pretend to be a historian all the time, but refering to himself as such a couple times because he discredits actual experts has caused the misinformation to spread.
Don't forget, Charlemagne was born, created his empire, died, and had his empire largely die because of stupid inheritance laws. The entire Carolingian Empire, aka why Europe is the way it is today and why Germany and France exist as countries, is because of the Carolingian Empire, the entirety of which had its duration during this period. Charlemagne is one of the single most important historical figures in all of Europe, and debatably the world. He was born after the start of the middle ages and the middle ages can largely be summed up as "things directly or indirectly the fault of Charlie the Magnificent". Hell, the HRE, Prussia, and Germany only exist because of Charlie, and basically any conflict between France and Germany in the past 1200 years is because of Charlie (and dumb inheritance laws). I just... The idea of saying the period Charlie existed in never happened is mind-bogglingly stupid. You'd have a vastly easier time arguing about, say, the dark ages, which at least lacks a wealth of historical data (in Europe. China and other parts of the world happily chronologued all that).
This "Historians" theory falls apart when you look at the middle east The muslims have been keeping their own dating system based off a lunar calendar since the hejira in 622 AD when the prophet Muhammad and his first followers the muhajiurun were forced to flee from mecca to medina then known as Yathrib. The muslim year is shorter than our year being that it is lunar and not solar it has 354- 355 days compared to our 365 day calendar, but it is currently 1442 AH anno hegirae if those 3 centuries did not exist the Muslim calendar would reflect this. The Muslim powers at the time of 700- 1000 AD also would have had no reason to jump their calendar 300 years considering their ongoing conquest of Christian Spain and their attempt to invade France in the 700's. They due to theological differences and current conflicts would not have agreed with the pope much less the HRE. This conspiracy theorist should have been laughed out of any publishing house worth its ink. On the plus side if this moron can publish garbage like this that means my history of North Africa will be a masterpiece in comparison when I finish my doctorate.
What you're missing in presenting all that is something to prove that calendar started in 622AD instead of 325AD. Not saying it isn't there, just pointing out that it is a necessary part if you're actually trying to counteract the idea. Plenty of histories with other calendars existed that covered the time span, but the key is you need to be able to peg the calendars together on both sides of the rift if you want to prove that they're both equally reliable between the pegs. And don't worry about your masterpiece: The reputation of the field as a whole will always overshadow any individual's difference in merit. Reputation for the field overall is forecast to remain as sweet as that gasoline with "every scientist with a job agrees its safe" triethyllead.
I think the biggest counter evidence to this conspiracy theory is just looking at the Middle East and especially the degradation of the Byzantine empire. By cutting 614 to 911, you loose most of the sassanid Byzantine war (it clearly is documented and changed the ERE), you cut the biggest visible change on the world stage: the rise of Islam. This means this conspiracy cuts of a highly documented part of history that has been written and physically built independently of the Pope, the HRE and the ERE’s will yet the events and states of the Islamic world are known to them. Second, the permanent territorial loses of the Byzantine empire by the caliphates cannot be forged and with the jump to the year 1000, how the hell did the ERE lost all of it’s middle eastern and North African lands? So in this theory how is Byzantium even going to justify it loosing thousands of kilometres? Not just the rise of Islam can be used as a strong argument, but the loss of Italy by the Lombards is the same argument: how can you even forge the loss of territory to an enemy if said enemy took it in those phantom years? So did Byzantium just magically shrink in this theory? Also how did the ERE collaborate with the pope and the HRE, the pope’s answer to Byzantine loss of power. If the time cutting started at 614, then the HRE wouldn’t exist yet. If the time cutting started at around 1000, there would be 0 cooperation. First of all, you would need the lombards taking over Italy, then Charlemagne taking the Lombard kingdoms and then the pope naming Charlemagne holy Roman emperor because he can actually protect the pope compared to the ERE that was currently led by a woman which made her legitimacy harder to justify. German historians are the whackiest I swear
I love how according to this Old English somehow got to the very different Middle English in no time at all, they just had to drop their grammar all in an instant.
I tried that approach with my high school history teacher. When asked about anything I would say it never happened. Sent to summer school for history and math. I would just leave the math test blank.
Tbh I'd blow up the moon so life can end faster, 5 bilion years Is too long IMO. Waiting that much is just boring so I say we hurry up. Of course, we cant blow up the sun, so let's blow up the moon.
0:21 - I resided in an estate in Manchester during 614-911, and I can confirm that the middle ages did not happen. It was mostly just plains and stuff during this time. We mostly just wandered about
I had a professor who would claim that one Russian grand prince (Alexander Nevsky) was the same person as Saladin. He had three main arguments for it. 1. Alexander's last mention in the historical chronicles happened at roughly the same time as the first mention of Saladin. 2. They both fought crusaders. 3. Their hats look kinda similar, must be a personal style sort of thing. This man also wanted to be my scientific supervisor. I had to politely refuse.
@@RadicalGarry Its a Marvel reference. Drax is told that all metaphors and jokes go over his head. He responds "Nothing goes over my head, my reflexes are too fast"
I remember this guy and his fanboys being incredibly active on German Usenet in the late 90s and early 2000s. Absolutely nuts, but got into long arguments with people. Never swayed by any counterarguments, very steadfast in his own ideology.
I really do appreciate how your videos aren't made in a vacuum. He references past topics he's researched and discussed, he builds on information he's provided in the past. It makes it feel a little more human and not like a robot designed to suck time out of my life, instead he's a human designed to suck time out of my life, as god intended.
I’m convinced that if huggbees removed his sunglasses there wouldn’t be eyes, his eyes are just sunglasses. Huugbees eyes never happened similar to the middle ages.
They're on display in a video where he does something involving his local PD I forget exactly what. Don't watch it he looks too normal like an average Joe instead of the content god he is
imagine someone a thousand years from now genuinely believing that everything from the 1800s to 2020s was just an elaborate fanfiction made by fucking big tech or something
A guy I know took a picture with you at the conn in Florida and didn’t know you were Huggbees. He just said “look it’s Critikals friend!” and I was pretty blown away that he had no idea what you do. Love your vids, man.
Education does not equate to intelligence. As someone who has spent a LOT of time around doctors, education equates to wealth far more than intelligence.
Bad take, considering that the only academic training Illig has is in German linguistics. He's not a historian, he has no training or experience in the field, he's an ignorant layman spouting a conspiracy theory founded on astonishing ignorance.
The Unabomber was a mathematical prodigy that went to Harvard and then turned himself into a bomb-making caveman simp after eating too much LSD. My point is, smart people be dumb sometimes.
Something about the way he said "he was born in..... 1947?" killed me, like not only was he confused that he was born in '47 and still alive, but also that he was born in 1947 and not 247
@@bird-scout listen you fake, it was actually the planet Mars, remember when the battle field data pointed out that the battle started a month before the Pluto Civil War. Get your facts correct if you are going to be time traveling smh
@@Spanish_Skeleton778 thats mister fake to you, and also im sorry i misremembered. I hope we can agree when illinois got involved thats when the war was basically over
Sure love that this historian’s whole argument for this not existing is that some dudes that he never knew, and therefore doesn’t exist decided to make it up. Actually, maybe he doesn’t even exist because I heard about him from this video but have never actually seen him myself!
When I was in seventh grade I did my independent study project on the phantom time hypothesis, I thought it was really cool. Unfortunately, near the end of the period of time where I was preparing my presentation on it I realized that it was really stupid, but it was way too late to go back, so I still had to go to the open house and give my presentation on it to a lot of people. Not great!
I have been listening to the official podcast at work for years and been watching the how it’s made videos and never once thought you looked like that brothermanguy
I actually had a similar argument with an old neighbor in middle school concerning the bible vs actual history. Her argument was "well how do we know the pilgrims existed at the founding of the US?" Even my 10 year old self was like "There's physical evidence and many other sources to confirm the pilgrims and our countries founding. Not so much with the stuff written in the bible to my knowledge"
Its even better when people try to use the bible (any bible really) as a concrete source for history. Yes. The extremely biased story book that changes every few years with a entire mass new edition every so often. Great source for history.
@@John.McMillan sometimes real historians do use ancient versions of the bible as historical evidence on stuff like Ancient Egypt and the Roman Empire, which are described in the bible in a good level of detail, providing a written source about them, something not so common from the perspectives it can offer, like the ones of common people. But, like any other piece of evidence, it has to be paired with more evidence to state something.
@@fulana_de_tal It's actually a pretty neat source. It even mentions Jericho, the second oldest human city. Course, some stuff is embellished because of how historians worked at the time, but it really is cool seeing all the things it mentions.
But he was there! He says he was born in 1947, however, in his mind, it's still only the 1700s. He was trying to communicate that he's from over 200 years in the future, a time traveller that went back to meet Charlemagne (his favourite historical figure) only to find out Charlemagne never existed, instead finding a couple of Roman speaking Frenchmen who were still satly about how the Huns raided Chalons a decade or two ago)! His time machine only had enough juice for one more trip, so thinking his machine must be overshoot, set it to an earlier point a couple centuries so he gets back home, and that's how he got stuck here, writing books in rage of how a bunch of stupid medieval bigshots scammed him out of his hero and his way home.
While I understand why "How its actually made" is more popular than these videos: society likes short, easy to consume, content. But goddamn these thoroughly thought out, almost nonsensical but at the same time incredibly logical, rants are top tier content.
I didn't read the proposal of why we should blow up the moon and I don't care why, but I fully stand behind this. When can we get started? I love how many great videos you are churning out lately btw
I suppose, astronomy can give an answer: In most higher cultures, eclipses and star constellations have been documented and the pivot points of different timelines could be determined. This also applies to the constellation/"comet" in our 0AD, which is said to have been a constellation of 3 objects.
The more realistic scenario is that 1,000 years of false history were added by simply putting a 1 in front of all historic findings.. and there's a lot of evidence to back that up
When I clicked on this video, I figured this was going to be some 'last thursdayism' bit, and the guy didn't actually believe that stuff but was just going for the whole "some theories can be considered undebunkable, even if they're total nonsense" schtick. I give people too much benefit of the doubt of not being crazy sometimes.
Illig przedstawił bardzo ciekawą ideę, jakoby część historii Europy została zmyślona lub zafałszowana, która nawet jeśli nie jest zgodna z prawdą, to wskazuje na bardzo poważną ułomność nauk historycznych, polegającą na braku, braku wiarygodności, czy błędną interpretację źródeł do nauk historycznych, humanistycznych, w tym zwłaszcza pisanych. Nawet jeśli cała koncepcja nie jest zgodna z prawdą to wytykanie wykrytych fałszerstw przymusza do weryfikacji dotychczasowej bazy żródłowej. Nie wiem dlaczego Illig nie sięga w swojej publicystyce po, wg mnie jedne z najbardziej skandalicznych fałszerstw dokumentów ale i najlepiej rozpoznane i opisane, wg mnie w całej hist. Europy, w których obecne jest całe spektrum czynności fałszerskich opisywanywanych przez siebie, tj.: 1. antydatowanie tzw. "złotej bulli", na podst. których tzw. krzyżacy zbudowali swoje państwo na ter. Prus: "historycy kwestionują autentyczność roku zamieszczonego na dokumencie[2]. Najprawdopodobniej został on antydatowany, a w rzeczywistości wydano go dopiero około 1235, kiedy to Krzyżacy poczuli się zagrożeni utratą ziemi dobrzyńskiej na rzecz Konrada I mazowieckiego", 2. fałszerstwo tzw. przywileju kruszwickiego: "umowa zawarta jakoby 16 czerwca 1230 r. między księciem Konradem I mazowieckim a Zakonem Krzyżackim, w której to książę przekazać miał Krzyżakom Ziemię Chełmińską i wszystkie przyległe tereny, które w przyszłości miałyby zostać podbite przez Zakon poza granicami Polski. Oryginał dokumentu nie zachował się, stąd jego prawdziwość jest w historiografii, szczególnie polskiej, podważana[1]. Od XX wieku historycy polscy uważają go za falsyfikat sporządzony przez zakon krzyżacki, niemieccy natomiast za dokument autentyczny[2]." 3. tzw. "przywilej kaliski", jakoby na podst. którego tzw. żydzi osiedlili się na ter. Wielkopolski a szerzej Polski, który to dokument prawdopodobnie nigdy nie istniał, bo nikt go nigdy nie widział a znany jest z kopi- kopii, jakoby utraconej: "...historyk Romuald Hube stwierdził, że 36-punktowa wersja dokumentu została sfałszowana w czasach Kazimierza Jagiellończyka..."
We've had a grasp on annuality since pretty much the dawn of culture and civilization. Source? Being able to farm effectively generation to generation and being able to properly communicate how the seasons move is probably pretty vital to successfully surviving
I saw Monty Python and the Holy Grail, you're telling me all of that is based off nothing? They're funny guys but let's be honest, I don't think they could come up with all of that on their own!
You got the days difference between Julian and Gregorian backwards. The Gregorian Calendar shifted 10 days when it should've shifted 13. Illig thought it was because of the fake 300 years. The actual reason is because they adjusted the calendar not to match the year 1, but the year 325, when the Council of Nicea which established Christian Orthodoxy took place.
The years before 2003 did not occur because I did not exist yet and I've only been told that years existed before it. You all popped into existence because of me popping into existence.
![[Part 1] รักมาไม่ทันตั้งตัว❤ หนุ่มสาวโสดถูกจับมาแต่งงานกันกะทันหัน แถมเธอยังเป็นหัวหน้าของเขา?!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y2pOOMkuFI0/mqdefault.jpg)
For those curious, the English title of that book is “The Invented Middle Ages: The greatest time falsification in history”
@Don't Read My Profile Photo shut up bot
@Don't Read My Profile Photo Ok stranger.
@Don't Read My Profile Photo I didn’t
I WASNT CURIOUS I LOVED THAT BIT
@Don't Read My Profile Photo I won't read yours if you don't read mine...
Imagine looking at 300 years of history and saying. “Yeah that seems pretty fake”
Did you mean to say this>
"The Gregorian reform was never purported to bring the calendar in line with the Julian calendar as it had existed at the time of its institution in 45 BC, but as it had existed in 325 AD, the time of the Council of Nicaea, which had established a method for determining the date of Easter Sunday by fixing the vernal equinox on March 21 in the Julian calendar. By 1582, the astronomical equinox was occurring on March 10 in the Julian calendar, but Easter was still being calculated from a nominal equinox on March 21. In 45 BC the astronomical vernal equinox took place around March 23. Illig's "three missing centuries" thus correspond to the 369 years between the institution of the Julian calendar in 45 BC, and the fixing of the Easter Date at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD."
You didn't exactly say that, did you?... lol
It would be more like 800 according to Fomenko. where Rome, Greece and middle age are contemporaneous and much closer to us as they added almost a century give the illusion the Church existed for a 1000 years more.
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 The most easiest and clearest answer why all religions are false is: ALL RELIGIOUS SOULS LIVE IN BABYLON.
CHRIST SAYS:
Revelation 18:4
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
Muslims live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
Hindus live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
new agers live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
Atheists live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
Ignorats live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
Satanists live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
Catholics live in the babylon, being partakers of her sins.
Christians = souls who are bible believers and obeyers, live being out from the Babylon and expose her wicked deeds.
Matthew 7:21
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
James 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
James 2:14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
2 Corinthians 13:5
Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?
Without the needed works, how can soul EXAMINE themselves and to see that they to be in Faith?
And if only FAITH is needed and not the doing of the WILL OF GOD (WORKS), then why there be only FEW who find the NARROW ROAD TO LIFE?
Why many perish, if many say they have faith?
Matthew 7:13
Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
Matthew 7:14
Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
@@theharshtruthoutthere Yeah I don't do compilations since the 80ies, I do synthesis at my age.
Jesus's aggregate of decisions and teachings gives you the bearing of a moral compass you ought to follow, if you don't, you fall.
If you read the bible and have to warp the meaning of things to make it suit said bearing with rationalisation, you might want to remember you were warned about the wolf in sheep's clothes.
So when the Jewish scholar tells you: you do not understand the Torah, what it means and what it represents in conjunction to the NT, they mean it. And you better believe it because it's their book, not yours.
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 GOD send a COMFORTER who through whom we shall have wisdom and UNDERSTADNING about heavenly thinks.
Believe no man, be they Jews or gentiles. BELEIVE AND TRUST ONLY GOD.
In our time, both the JEWS AND THE GENTLES CAN GET SAVED.
“All you have are history books, photographs…”
Photographs from any date between 614 and 911 would be revolutionary to be honest
I have some. I took them while I was on my immortal journey to the west and happened to see some weird looking people dressed in armor build some shit. Idk why but apparently it's still here today so I had to go back and take a photo. Of course, I will not give my precious photos to anyone so dont bother asking. Also, I am the reason Lord Nobunaga died and why the Long Dinasty ceased to exist, I just wanted to take some pictures and they treated me like a lunatic
@@FabioKun did you see Pangu?
@Fabio Kun
I took some selfies with the likes of Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, and even Adam and Eve which I kept in a photo album at the library of Alexandria. No you can’t see them as I was in my awkward teen phase in those pictures and I looked really bad at them, so I just decided to burn the whole library down to avoid further embarrassment
Finally its here. YES
th-cam.com/video/cfRZBPgLmt4/w-d-xo.html
@@shapshapshapshap2829 understandable. To be honest these guys weren't that great anyways, besides Alexander fucking legend
As an undying being cursed to perpetually live, robbed of the blessing of death, I can agree that it was quite a mindfuck when everyone said it was 912,one day after New Years on 613
As a german history student I'd like to raise an objection about Heribert Illig being referred to as a historian. Heribert Illig never acquired any credentials that would allow him to claim to be a historian. The only thing he ever studied are germanistics which is the study of german language and literature.
He's about as qualified to be a historian as PETA is to run an animal shelter.
Thanks for this comment, I never found that info in my quick research on the subject. Then again since I don't speak German it made a lot of sources unusable for me.
Makes the whole thing even funnier if ya think about it.
@@Huggbees man, you didn't learn an entire language just to make a video? Kinda lame bro ngl
@@Huggbees Hey Hugbees, great video. Love when your videos are both informative and humorous at the same time. I remember you said in a podcast that you were planning to release more informative videos at one point.
PETA was qualified to run an animal shelter, the 3% of animals that survived them can vouch for them.
Sadly, he is still more qualified to be a historian than PETA is qualified to run an animal shelter.
"Numbers in their names because they're robots or some shit"
This is incredible insight and would make for top tier fanfiction
Henry 8.0 (English model) was a wild update back in the 16th century with it comes to robotic monarchs.
I just took a class about the Middle Ages in uni, so I though he was going to talk about how our modern perception of the period we consider to be the middle ages is not real, and discuss the reality of what went on during that time. But no, its quite literally about some guy with no credentials theorizing about how those years literally just didn't happen, lmao.
i expected something similar. that would be a sick followup
Yeah, that's what I figured too but knowing Huggbees I knew there was gonna be some wild twist...
still a bit surprised at quite how wild that twist was though
I don't think his lack of credentials is really the problem with the theory
@@Rakkoonn Very true
@@Rakkoonn with enough google scholars you can be a master at anything. But then again you think the moon landing happen? I don't even believe the moon is real.
What I'm getting at, some people are just crazy or just to far out there.
You failing the translation then just forgetting about it is the best joke I’ve seen you do. Maybe it’s just my sense of humor, but I haven’t laughed this hard about something in a while. Thank you
I love how Herabert was like “We have concrete evidence like ruins and ancient texts, but fuck it, you weren’t there, so it doesn’t exist”
This is my conclusive proof that Canada doesn't exist.
And you are blindly trusting the historians for what reason? Just cuz?
I don't think you know what the word "evidence" means.
@@deangulberry1876 Blindly agreeing with any asshole who says something contrary to mainstream isn't much smarter son.
@@deangulberry1876 Though, how is it you think that pointing out one person's lack of credibility means that they "blindly" accept whatever somebody else says anyway? You mean people can't just be wrong or ill-fit as an authority on a subject, and that not believing them isn't part of some bias or agenda?
0:41 I want to know where the photographs from the 600s are.
I can personally say that those years did not happen, I was born in the year 68,230 BC, and I personally flipped my fancy new "Gregorian" calendar from December, 613 to January 912. Upon seeing this strange loss of 298 years, I proclaimed "1984". I held onto this until I met the prestigious author George Orwell, whom I told of my experience. George later thanked me for being the inspiration for his phenomenal novel "1984", a commentary on liberal wokeness that Orwell predicted would happen around the year 2020.
This comment is phenomenal
relatable
This is such a Rollercoaster...
I am saving that comment in my quotebook
One misrepresentation of your comment made me think you thought the Gregorian calendar happened in 613. Glad I re-read that bit a few times
You can't prove I wasn't there from the years of 614 to 911.
Does Huggbees exist when a video isn't playing?
No. The answer is no.
He goes to the same place your parents go when they cover their faces with their hands. It's so funny when they come back! It's magic!
No one can prove this wrong. After all, have YOU ever seen him when a video isn’t playing? I didn’t think so.
None of us were born with object perminence, its true
Have you ever seen the back of your eyes? That's where Huggbees resides.
Ah yes. Object Permanence.
When you can't see Huggbees, he stays in your nightmares. You just haven't seen him yet.
1:20 Translates to
" The Invented Middle Ages
The Greatest Time Falsification in History "
Those damn Middle Ages thought they could fool me
The loch ness monster never run outta tricks ta play on us!
@@keamu8580 I need about tree-fitty years to be removed from that calendar
@@SeanWinters Got dangit monster! Leave my dang calendar alone!
Everyone knows dark souls was during that time!
this mans entire channel is a gemstone of sarcasm, and i am here for every second of it
honestly this has always been my favorite conspiracy theory because the theory is literally just saying that something happen. we have more proof that it did happen but this theory just goes “nu uh that isn’t real” to every answer.
A bit like the flat earthers.
Welcome to all conspiracy theories.
@@MarvinHartmann452 And moon landing hoaxers.
@@cabobo1600 Not all of them, but most of them. Saying that the government is doing this spooky experiment or other is probably fine, but adding on Aliens is just too goofy. Same here, this is literally just One Piece "Void Century" but without the god-like beings who could actually pull it off.
0:11 wait the middle ages lasted till 2001
It's so funny taken out of context especially with him doubling down on it on his next sentence :v
Cut like that it sounds like he said “9/11 didn’t happen”
I see what you did there.😂.
Heribert Illig doesn't have any sort of higher education in history or any formation with a historian, you can't call him a historian. He just read some books and made up his revisionism.
Huggbees made the video to make fun of illig lol
Even so. What is your ... Nope never mind huggbees gave the various counter arguments.
Speaking of revisionism.... resident evil 4 vr and other games are censored and denied platforms. Remakes too.
@@RomanumChristum oh I know I just think he is giving more credit than its due by keeping calling him a historian, Huggbees could even had dug deeper in the wound by mentioning that Illig actually just called himself a "real historian" and doesn't have a degree, because that's what happened. Illig doesn't even pretend to be a historian all the time, but refering to himself as such a couple times because he discredits actual experts has caused the misinformation to spread.
Well in the US that counts as being a historian.
that goes both ways you cant prove it you weren't there
Don't forget, Charlemagne was born, created his empire, died, and had his empire largely die because of stupid inheritance laws. The entire Carolingian Empire, aka why Europe is the way it is today and why Germany and France exist as countries, is because of the Carolingian Empire, the entirety of which had its duration during this period.
Charlemagne is one of the single most important historical figures in all of Europe, and debatably the world. He was born after the start of the middle ages and the middle ages can largely be summed up as "things directly or indirectly the fault of Charlie the Magnificent". Hell, the HRE, Prussia, and Germany only exist because of Charlie, and basically any conflict between France and Germany in the past 1200 years is because of Charlie (and dumb inheritance laws). I just... The idea of saying the period Charlie existed in never happened is mind-bogglingly stupid. You'd have a vastly easier time arguing about, say, the dark ages, which at least lacks a wealth of historical data (in Europe. China and other parts of the world happily chronologued all that).
I learned something new today, thanks.
yeah but you werent there
All conspiracy theories manufactured by the Ruinous Pow-...Err...the powers that be!
Finally its here. YES
th-cam.com/video/cfRZBPgLmt4/w-d-xo.html
@@chaosundivided2525 HMMMMM?
He’s not the first person to say 911 didn’t happen
This "Historians" theory falls apart when you look at the middle east The muslims have been keeping their own dating system based off a lunar calendar since the hejira in 622 AD when the prophet Muhammad and his first followers the muhajiurun were forced to flee from mecca to medina then known as Yathrib. The muslim year is shorter than our year being that it is lunar and not solar it has 354- 355 days compared to our 365 day calendar, but it is currently 1442 AH anno hegirae if those 3 centuries did not exist the Muslim calendar would reflect this. The Muslim powers at the time of 700- 1000 AD also would have had no reason to jump their calendar 300 years considering their ongoing conquest of Christian Spain and their attempt to invade France in the 700's. They due to theological differences and current conflicts would not have agreed with the pope much less the HRE. This conspiracy theorist should have been laughed out of any publishing house worth its ink.
On the plus side if this moron can publish garbage like this that means my history of North Africa will be a masterpiece in comparison when I finish my doctorate.
What you're missing in presenting all that is something to prove that calendar started in 622AD instead of 325AD. Not saying it isn't there, just pointing out that it is a necessary part if you're actually trying to counteract the idea. Plenty of histories with other calendars existed that covered the time span, but the key is you need to be able to peg the calendars together on both sides of the rift if you want to prove that they're both equally reliable between the pegs.
And don't worry about your masterpiece: The reputation of the field as a whole will always overshadow any individual's difference in merit. Reputation for the field overall is forecast to remain as sweet as that gasoline with "every scientist with a job agrees its safe" triethyllead.
Man ancient Muslim scholars were so cool.
My thoughts exactly.
I think the biggest counter evidence to this conspiracy theory is just looking at the Middle East and especially the degradation of the Byzantine empire. By cutting 614 to 911, you loose most of the sassanid Byzantine war (it clearly is documented and changed the ERE), you cut the biggest visible change on the world stage: the rise of Islam.
This means this conspiracy cuts of a highly documented part of history that has been written and physically built independently of the Pope, the HRE and the ERE’s will yet the events and states of the Islamic world are known to them. Second, the permanent territorial loses of the Byzantine empire by the caliphates cannot be forged and with the jump to the year 1000, how the hell did the ERE lost all of it’s middle eastern and North African lands? So in this theory how is Byzantium even going to justify it loosing thousands of kilometres?
Not just the rise of Islam can be used as a strong argument, but the loss of Italy by the Lombards is the same argument: how can you even forge the loss of territory to an enemy if said enemy took it in those phantom years? So did Byzantium just magically shrink in this theory?
Also how did the ERE collaborate with the pope and the HRE, the pope’s answer to Byzantine loss of power. If the time cutting started at 614, then the HRE wouldn’t exist yet. If the time cutting started at around 1000, there would be 0 cooperation. First of all, you would need the lombards taking over Italy, then Charlemagne taking the Lombard kingdoms and then the pope naming Charlemagne holy Roman emperor because he can actually protect the pope compared to the ERE that was currently led by a woman which made her legitimacy harder to justify.
German historians are the whackiest I swear
let me know how the indoctrination goes!
@5:24
"You weren't there man, i've seen some shxt, man!"
...Vector Bunny, 2017...
I was there. Can confirm those years happened
Same it was pretty fun we had space lizards
Liar
Oh yeah? Name 3
@@trippiechris1852 Everyone who was there knew Bob, Joe and Mike, great guys who also were lizards from space.
@@alphax4785 oh shit Bob and Joe were there?
Those two owe me a Michelin star dinner.
I love how according to this Old English somehow got to the very different Middle English in no time at all, they just had to drop their grammar all in an instant.
"Historian" is a very strong word for Heribert. "Idiot" and "Man in need of medication and therapy" are much more appropriate titles for him.
So your telling me that Historian in a straight jacket at the local Asylum wasn't saying factual statements?
"History in-the-same-room-as-ian" doesn't roll off the tongue as well, though...
Nice job debunking anything he wrote about.
So he needs slave pills and brainwashing, got it.
Sounds like a historian to me.
I tried that approach with my high school history teacher. When asked about anything I would say it never happened. Sent to summer school for history and math. I would just leave the math test blank.
We could solve virtually all problems on Earth by blowing up the Middle Ages
We could solve virtually all the problems on Earth by blowing up the explosions.
We could solve virtually all problems on Earth by blowing up
Tbh I'd blow up the moon so life can end faster, 5 bilion years Is too long IMO. Waiting that much is just boring so I say we hurry up. Of course, we cant blow up the sun, so let's blow up the moon.
And the reason is people like these.
@@FabioKun Too bad, I stole all your dynamite.
this might be the best youtube video that has ever been made
im personally a fan of the left and right ages they're honeslty underated.
The upper ages were weird tho
And the lower ages were strangely violent.
I'd say the lower middle ages were good enough, since during the upper middle ages, people seem to just have too much on their hands.
Yeah but it started to fall of in the front ages
The back ages got real weird real quick
2:52 it's sad how true this is. (no seriously, this is the loneliest generation ever)
0:21 - I resided in an estate in Manchester during 614-911, and I can confirm that the middle ages did not happen. It was mostly just plains and stuff during this time. We mostly just wandered about
I was there, and can confirm that from the Low Ages, we jumped straight to the High Ages, with nothing in between.
Your command of the German language is impressive
I had a professor who would claim that one Russian grand prince (Alexander Nevsky) was the same person as Saladin. He had three main arguments for it.
1. Alexander's last mention in the historical chronicles happened at roughly the same time as the first mention of Saladin.
2. They both fought crusaders.
3. Their hats look kinda similar, must be a personal style sort of thing.
This man also wanted to be my scientific supervisor. I had to politely refuse.
LMAO.
FUNNIEST SHIT I'VE HEARD IN QUITE A WHILE
It really bugs me whenever people with higher education believe in some crazy ass conspiracy theories or urban legends.
Bruh💀
Your original content is better than 99% of stuff on this platform. Thank you for making these.
Sure
I found out TH-cam automatically unsubscribed me to your channel after a whole year of watching and enjoying every video you made
Heribert Illig, the original 911 truther
911 un-truther
@@thirstycrow6393 arms like Drax on this one, nothing going above that head.
@@robonator2945 I don’t get this joke. Is it irony? Is it a reference? Is it both? Please help, I am stupid.
@@RadicalGarry
Its a Marvel reference. Drax is told that all metaphors and jokes go over his head. He responds "Nothing goes over my head, my reflexes are too fast"
@@genghisn7 thanks Peter
I remember this guy and his fanboys being incredibly active on German Usenet in the late 90s and early 2000s. Absolutely nuts, but got into long arguments with people. Never swayed by any counterarguments, very steadfast in his own ideology.
I really do appreciate how your videos aren't made in a vacuum. He references past topics he's researched and discussed, he builds on information he's provided in the past. It makes it feel a little more human and not like a robot designed to suck time out of my life, instead he's a human designed to suck time out of my life, as god intended.
As a person from a country whose national language is Swahili, it was great to see you speak it.
Imagine if that shady group of 3 decided to play a joke on the 4th person that it was really year 1000 and they've been playing ever since
3 days per year would be a loss of less than 1 year per century, meaning that it would take over 300 centuries to lose 300 years.
30,000 years
I’m convinced that if huggbees removed his sunglasses there wouldn’t be eyes, his eyes are just sunglasses. Huugbees eyes never happened similar to the middle ages.
If you look really closely, you can see one eye through one of the lenses.
No, wait, that's my reflection.
They're on display in a video where he does something involving his local PD I forget exactly what. Don't watch it he looks too normal like an average Joe instead of the content god he is
imagine someone a thousand years from now genuinely believing that everything from the 1800s to 2020s was just an elaborate fanfiction made by fucking big tech or something
We’re all AI
YOOO two uploads in the weekend? You're giving us the good stuff man
5:32 That deadpan stare right after supporting Heribert, before finally dropping the act and going on about why he's stupid was perfect.
Eight straight minutes of huggbees telling me “YOU WERENT THERE”. Beautiful.
A guy I know took a picture with you at the conn in Florida and didn’t know you were Huggbees. He just said “look it’s Critikals friend!” and I was pretty blown away that he had no idea what you do. Love your vids, man.
Education does not equate to intelligence.
As someone who has spent a LOT of time around doctors, education equates to wealth far more than intelligence.
There are so many professors at my school that just seem to lack all common sense and human intuition.
That's very eloquently put.
Bad take, considering that the only academic training Illig has is in German linguistics. He's not a historian, he has no training or experience in the field, he's an ignorant layman spouting a conspiracy theory founded on astonishing ignorance.
The Unabomber was a mathematical prodigy that went to Harvard and then turned himself into a bomb-making caveman simp after eating too much LSD. My point is, smart people be dumb sometimes.
Something about the way he said "he was born in..... 1947?" killed me, like not only was he confused that he was born in '47 and still alive, but also that he was born in 1947 and not 247
as someone who time traveled, i can confirm the middle ages didnt happen
Mr time traveler can I ask which western nation gets a civil war first after the year 2021?
@@CrazyDutchguys thats mister mr time traveler to you, and the answer is the dwarf planet pluto
shit gets wacky soon
@@bird-scout listen you fake, it was actually the planet Mars, remember when the battle field data pointed out that the battle started a month before the Pluto Civil War. Get your facts correct if you are going to be time traveling smh
@@Spanish_Skeleton778 thats mister fake to you, and also im sorry i misremembered. I hope we can agree when illinois got involved thats when the war was basically over
And that's why the invention of the lightbulb never happened because no one I knew was there then it allegedly happened
Sure love that this historian’s whole argument for this not existing is that some dudes that he never knew, and therefore doesn’t exist decided to make it up.
Actually, maybe he doesn’t even exist because I heard about him from this video but have never actually seen him myself!
Facts
I dont know you sooo
@plantainsame2049 No! Nononono I'm fading! How could you do t
dude this video is absolutely amazing. please do more history stuff!!!
When I was in seventh grade I did my independent study project on the phantom time hypothesis, I thought it was really cool. Unfortunately, near the end of the period of time where I was preparing my presentation on it I realized that it was really stupid, but it was way too late to go back, so I still had to go to the open house and give my presentation on it to a lot of people. Not great!
I have been listening to the official podcast at work for years and been watching the how it’s made videos and never once thought you looked like that brothermanguy
Top-tier educational content 👌💯
This sounds like something someone who finally was early would say if they didn't know what to say but didn't want to be the type to say "first"
And since you posted this around the exact time he posted the video you probably typed that then went to watch the video after
Coming here straight from a video called "Advice for Time Traveling to Medieval Europe"
I love your fresh take on this alternative theory. Would love to hear more on other moronic theories!
My favorite one is that mountains are actually the fossilized remains of giant tree stumps, and that Earth was once covered in mountain-sized trees.
@@thenew4559 wait what
Show this to someone in 2013 and they would believe it
2:09 that's not Constantine VII, this is Simeon the Great, a bulgarian tsar. Good vid though.
1:10 to 1:50 Is easly to single best fragment of content in the entire TH-cam and it will reamain so for centuries.
I actually had a similar argument with an old neighbor in middle school concerning the bible vs actual history. Her argument was "well how do we know the pilgrims existed at the founding of the US?" Even my 10 year old self was like "There's physical evidence and many other sources to confirm the pilgrims and our countries founding. Not so much with the stuff written in the bible to my knowledge"
Evidence is the shorthand term.
Its even better when people try to use the bible (any bible really) as a concrete source for history.
Yes. The extremely biased story book that changes every few years with a entire mass new edition every so often. Great source for history.
@@John.McMillan sometimes real historians do use ancient versions of the bible as historical evidence on stuff like Ancient Egypt and the Roman Empire, which are described in the bible in a good level of detail, providing a written source about them, something not so common from the perspectives it can offer, like the ones of common people. But, like any other piece of evidence, it has to be paired with more evidence to state something.
@@fulana_de_tal It's actually a pretty neat source. It even mentions Jericho, the second oldest human city. Course, some stuff is embellished because of how historians worked at the time, but it really is cool seeing all the things it mentions.
The Bible is an actual contemporaneous historical document
But he was there! He says he was born in 1947, however, in his mind, it's still only the 1700s. He was trying to communicate that he's from over 200 years in the future, a time traveller that went back to meet Charlemagne (his favourite historical figure) only to find out Charlemagne never existed, instead finding a couple of Roman speaking Frenchmen who were still satly about how the Huns raided Chalons a decade or two ago)! His time machine only had enough juice for one more trip, so thinking his machine must be overshoot, set it to an earlier point a couple centuries so he gets back home, and that's how he got stuck here, writing books in rage of how a bunch of stupid medieval bigshots scammed him out of his hero and his way home.
Actually I can say that I was there… I wasn’t… but I can say I was
Consistently the best type of content
Hugbees: Were you there between the years 614 and 911 AD.
Me, secretly a vampire: .....no
As someone who is currently 4297 years, 3 months, 21 days, 5 hours, 53 minutes, and 34 seconds old, I can confirm these years never happened.
Clearly you were sleeping during those times, bcs they did happen, I was there and got the photos to prove it
Does your age count these years or no?
While I understand why "How its actually made" is more popular than these videos: society likes short, easy to consume, content. But goddamn these thoroughly thought out, almost nonsensical but at the same time incredibly logical, rants are top tier content.
I didn't read the proposal of why we should blow up the moon and I don't care why, but I fully stand behind this. When can we get started?
I love how many great videos you are churning out lately btw
“does a tree make a sound if it falls and no one is around” the theory
This is the only video that made me mad, then relieved, mad again, and laughing my ass off.
Good on ya mr. Hugbee, ya got me twice
I suppose, astronomy can give an answer: In most higher cultures, eclipses and star constellations have been documented and the pivot points of different timelines could be determined.
This also applies to the constellation/"comet" in our 0AD, which is said to have been a constellation of 3 objects.
Been reading Department of Truth and they covered that conspiracy.
Hypothesis, not theory.
Yes, I have been alive since -37 A.D.
Broke: blow up the moon
Woke: blow up the past
The more realistic scenario is that 1,000 years of false history were added by simply putting a 1 in front of all historic findings.. and there's a lot of evidence to back that up
When I clicked on this video, I figured this was going to be some 'last thursdayism' bit, and the guy didn't actually believe that stuff but was just going for the whole "some theories can be considered undebunkable, even if they're total nonsense" schtick. I give people too much benefit of the doubt of not being crazy sometimes.
lmfao you don't believe the universe was created last thursday? absolute scrub
I remembered reading an old book that spoke about a war between early recorded humans and giants that terrorized them around this time
I feel like when referring to Mr. Illig, historian should be in quotations.
Dude, I was exposed to this via Mr. Terry history. Great video! It earned you a follow from me!
Truly amazing character development.
Illig przedstawił bardzo ciekawą ideę, jakoby część historii Europy została zmyślona lub zafałszowana, która nawet jeśli nie jest zgodna z prawdą, to wskazuje na bardzo poważną ułomność nauk historycznych, polegającą na braku, braku wiarygodności, czy błędną interpretację źródeł do nauk historycznych, humanistycznych, w tym zwłaszcza pisanych. Nawet jeśli cała koncepcja nie jest zgodna z prawdą to wytykanie wykrytych fałszerstw przymusza do weryfikacji dotychczasowej bazy żródłowej.
Nie wiem dlaczego Illig nie sięga w swojej publicystyce po, wg mnie jedne z najbardziej skandalicznych fałszerstw dokumentów ale i najlepiej rozpoznane i opisane, wg mnie w całej hist. Europy, w których obecne jest całe spektrum czynności fałszerskich opisywanywanych przez siebie, tj.:
1. antydatowanie tzw. "złotej bulli", na podst. których tzw. krzyżacy zbudowali swoje państwo na ter. Prus: "historycy kwestionują autentyczność roku zamieszczonego na dokumencie[2]. Najprawdopodobniej został on antydatowany, a w rzeczywistości wydano go dopiero około 1235, kiedy to Krzyżacy poczuli się zagrożeni utratą ziemi dobrzyńskiej na rzecz Konrada I mazowieckiego",
2. fałszerstwo tzw. przywileju kruszwickiego: "umowa zawarta jakoby 16 czerwca 1230 r. między księciem Konradem I mazowieckim a Zakonem Krzyżackim, w której to książę przekazać miał Krzyżakom Ziemię Chełmińską i wszystkie przyległe tereny, które w przyszłości miałyby zostać podbite przez Zakon poza granicami Polski. Oryginał dokumentu nie zachował się, stąd jego prawdziwość jest w historiografii, szczególnie polskiej, podważana[1]. Od XX wieku historycy polscy uważają go za falsyfikat sporządzony przez zakon krzyżacki, niemieccy natomiast za dokument autentyczny[2]."
3. tzw. "przywilej kaliski", jakoby na podst. którego tzw. żydzi osiedlili się na ter. Wielkopolski a szerzej Polski, który to dokument prawdopodobnie nigdy nie istniał, bo nikt go nigdy nie widział a znany jest z kopi- kopii, jakoby utraconej: "...historyk Romuald Hube stwierdził, że 36-punktowa wersja dokumentu została sfałszowana w czasach Kazimierza Jagiellończyka..."
17s in, this is gonna be a banger
I wasn't there, but I know somebody who knew somebody that knew somebody that knew somebody that knew somebody....that was there
0:27 actually i was there and saw it all, it happend,
ive seen all of human history as i am 100,000 years old
@@CS88528same
OK BOMMER
We've had a grasp on annuality since pretty much the dawn of culture and civilization. Source? Being able to farm effectively generation to generation and being able to properly communicate how the seasons move is probably pretty vital to successfully surviving
If the Middle Ages happened, then where’s the found footage? Exactly.
"you honor, shut the fuck up. you wasn't even there"
3:02 didnt have to go there 💀
ah, that explains the existence, or rather, lack of, dragons
I saw Monty Python and the Holy Grail, you're telling me all of that is based off nothing? They're funny guys but let's be honest, I don't think they could come up with all of that on their own!
For all we can prove, we popped into existence with all of our memories and proof of a past just 2 seconds ago
That's just what they want you to think.
You got the days difference between Julian and Gregorian backwards. The Gregorian Calendar shifted 10 days when it should've shifted 13. Illig thought it was because of the fake 300 years. The actual reason is because they adjusted the calendar not to match the year 1, but the year 325, when the Council of Nicea which established Christian Orthodoxy took place.
"I find the verdict guilty of-"
"Your honor, shut the fuck up. You wasn't there, you didn't see shit."
The years before 2003 did not occur because I did not exist yet and I've only been told that years existed before it. You all popped into existence because of me popping into existence.
Absolutely rock solid arguement, according to Heribert Illig that is.
Haruhi Suzumiya moment
Oh man brother your video had me rolling it's priceless.
3:19
I’m sorry the WHAT