2024 Lexus LBX Review | Small SUV is cheapest way into a Lexus, but worth it?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 43

  • @theusefulchannel
    @theusefulchannel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    For a quick review, I found it pretty informative.

  • @samartz
    @samartz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If it had a slightly bigger engine with the same price, id be more keen!

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The reviewer mentioned 3 Lbx models. I can find only 2 on the local Lexus website.

    • @aidin1362
      @aidin1362 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      2WD version comes in two classes. Luxury, and Sport Luxury.

    • @Barry-26
      @Barry-26 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aidin1362they do have AWD too.

  • @ruudvdberg8580
    @ruudvdberg8580 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Turbo engine? As far as I know they come without turb, which explains 136 bhp.

    • @golden_eye2349
      @golden_eye2349 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes its non-turbo engine

    • @Roy-pk4xd
      @Roy-pk4xd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1.5 N.A 136 BHP is pretty good , 90 from ICE extra power from 2x E.motors

  • @KJP-dv2uj
    @KJP-dv2uj 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When describing the engine, the graphic on the screen describes it as a turbo-petrol. I do not think it is. It is a naturally aspirated hybrid.

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m comparing the Luxury LBX to a similarly priced Toyota CHR and a Renault Megan e-tech. There are big differences in specs of the cars. Once I have test driven all three it will be easier tell which one is best.

    • @Brendo95
      @Brendo95 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So, how’d you go?

    • @DJAYPAZ
      @DJAYPAZ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Brendo95 I opted for the CHR. The LBX was very good but the rear sear legroom was very small. Wait time for delivery was around 6 months. The Megane E-tech was also very good but less safety tech than the CHR. The Toyota was available immediately.

    • @kevind6956
      @kevind6956 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DJAYPAZ Just taken out a CHR on a test drive. Great comfort but the Lexus (What Car car of the year) was superior in luxury and it didn't have that horrible Ipad type screen. Both great cars.

    • @DJAYPAZ
      @DJAYPAZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ Thanks for replying. Agreed they are both great cars. The paint finish of the Lexus is better than the CHR. One of the deciding factors for me was rear seat legroom. The CHR has more than the Lexus. Ultimately availability was the final factor that steered me to the CHR. At the time of purchase it was one week versus 6 months.

  • @论论
    @论论 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you want me spend 61k on hatch, 61k of money i can spend on toyota rav4 top range EDGE. Please advice me which one better ?

    • @DJAYPAZ
      @DJAYPAZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@论论 The RAV4 is a much larger vehicle than the CHR.

  • @davidkean5680
    @davidkean5680 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good work

  • @sheezy2526
    @sheezy2526 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When Lexus CT200H was sold back in 2016 it was actually a worthwhile purchase because the price was in 30K range. Now you can get a way better Kia or a Hyandai around the same price. They are as reliable as Toyotas/Lexus and are fun to drive. There is absolutely no way this is worth 54K - 64K.

    • @cristi724
      @cristi724 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A Corolla hatch sized Lexus would be awesome to have again. Shame they only make stupid SUVs and very large sedans now.

    • @sheezy2526
      @sheezy2526 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cristi724 Yeah True, even with other brands the hatch variant the suv is based on is usually better and cheaper. I have driven an i30 and a Kona and i30 is way better in almost every way.

    • @alecmally5433
      @alecmally5433 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Stop whining about the CT200H....it was decent for its time, but basically a Toyota Auris on steroids.

  • @cristi724
    @cristi724 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think they could've spared some efficiency for the sake of better performance. It is a premium car after all and would have made the price an easier pill to swallow for this class.

    • @DJAYPAZ
      @DJAYPAZ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed, the lack of power could be a problem.

    • @DJAYPAZ
      @DJAYPAZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      After driving the car for over 3000 kilometres I don't think there is a lack of power. When driven in sport mode the Koba CHR has good acceleration and throttle response. I guess it comes down to what a buyer wants.

    • @cristi724
      @cristi724 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DJAYPAZ As far as I know the CHR comes with 4 cylinder engines only, maybe your market is different, the LBX is a 3 cylinder. If you're talking about the 2.0 Hybrid that can come on the CHR, that is plenty fast, but this LBX has a much less powerful drivetrain.

    • @DJAYPAZ
      @DJAYPAZ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ The 4 cylinder CHR engine is definitely zippy.

  • @davidbae997
    @davidbae997 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I own a Lexus and I love Lexus,
    But this is not a Lexus,
    doesn't seem worth it.
    3 cylinder $56900?!
    Car cost = $36900
    $20000 = lexus badge cost😂

  • @sofiaalee
    @sofiaalee 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No sunroof? For that price, I wont be buying

  • @MD-dj8rm
    @MD-dj8rm 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Lexus should redesign the front grille of the car: The front grille of the car is so big out of proportion and ugly !?!

  • @ckrgkrptkfwk5250
    @ckrgkrptkfwk5250 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a name, Lexus. not worth it. 😂

  • @thendebele
    @thendebele 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is as much nonsense as having a Range Rover hatchback! Completely off brand

    • @cristi724
      @cristi724 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What are you talking about? Lexus has a full line of SUVs, this is just the right car for places like Europe with tight cities and busy traffic.

  • @GlowingTube
    @GlowingTube 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No, not worth it.

  • @TenzWang88
    @TenzWang88 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lexus can’t sell their overpriced cars here in Australia. So they bring this cheap luxury car to feed their dealers across the country 😂😂😂

    • @daweigo6851
      @daweigo6851 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Lexus sell very well in Australia 😮

  • @Allanhyde264
    @Allanhyde264 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nope. A Yaris with a different badge and some leather is still a glorified overpriced Yaris.
    How can they call it a Lexus product when it doesn’t even have rear aircon vents and a back arm rest.
    Just spend the extra $5k for a Euro. Toyota and Lexus are now run by accountants, not engineers.
    Crap product.

    • @cristi724
      @cristi724 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't get me wrong, I think it's a quirky car, a premium supermini SUV with a very not-premium engine, but rear armrest and vents in this class don't exist. They don't make sense anyway.

    • @Allanhyde264
      @Allanhyde264 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cristi724we live in QLD. It absolutely does make sense to have rear air vents. This is a

    • @cristi724
      @cristi724 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Allanhyde264 In this segment the rear passengers are not a priority in comfort or features for any brand. You don't buy this car for roadtrips or taxi, you buy it for 1-2 people, with at most one kid, so they can zip around to places on the cheap. They are very small in the back, really not comfortable for mid-long rides, and having the AC on in the front is enough to cool the whole car very fast.
      Look at this video, his knees are almost touching the center console.

    • @1andycraig
      @1andycraig 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The yaris cross costs as much if u go 4x4 but with cheaper interior so its a no brainer which to choose

    • @pitou115
      @pitou115 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A part for 2 little kids, there is no room at the rear anyhow 😂