Hidden lore from the book: The compys are slightly venomous and the venom actually causes hallucinations, this would cause dieter to become weaker and weaker. The girl was saved by her parents.
It always bugged me when Sarah said in a really snooty way they are there to observe and not to interact after almost getting killed because she just had to touch a baby dinosaur
@@SabrinaLWilliamsShe is the single stupidest character I've ever seen in a blockbuster movie, if only because she's supposed to be an expert and always seems to conveniently forget all of her expertise and knowledge when she needs it the most. By all rights, she should've been eaten. She certainly deserved it.
James Haines LOL best comment ever. And i want to ask you, which T-rex do you think is the mother? I have a strong instinct saying the one on the right is the mother because it is more curvy...?
The scene with the compies on the beach attacking a young girl was actually a loose adaptation of something that happened in the original Jurassic Park novel. As a matter of fact, that young girl survived, too, just with some serious and somewhat-poisoned bites on her arm that the doctors managed to treat successfully. In the book it actually went somewhere, though, as the girl drew a picture of the "lizards" that attacked her and a doctor's assistant later recognized it as a dinosaur; the doctor scoffed at the notion, but the assistant took initiative behind his back and contacted Alan Grant about it. So weirdly, in the book, Grant and Sattler had a notion that dinosaurs were alive, in some capacity, before they found out what Isla Nublar was actually for. That wasn't the only thing the compies were doing in the beginning of the novel, though; they were also sneaking around mainland Costa Rica, biting helpless infants and old people where they could get at them. Also in the book, John Hammond (a much less likeable guy in the novel version of his portrayal) tripped, got hurt, and was subsequently eaten to death by the compies. Ironic justice, woo-hoo.
M.R. MISM I enjoyed the books, however especially in the first one they were even less scientifically accurate than the films. (Although I guess you have to forgive Michael Crichton for that since they are pretty old and it was decently accurate for that time). What bugged me about them was how tiring some of Ian‘s speeches were. In the films it‘s nice to hear him go on about chaos theory every so often but in the books it can get a little much, since it‘s all he seems to talk about and can actually go on for several paragraphs. Other than that a great read though.
LOL-- The San Diego scene was a Spielberg idea! The original ending was for Malcolm and the group to escape from pterodactyls. But Spielberg really, REALLY wanted to bring the T. Rex to the mainland. He knew this was the last Jurassic Park movie he would direct, and he wanted to film his own version of King Kong/Godzilla. That's why the entire 3rd act is so tonally different. It all come from Spielberg's doing.
Randal Graves the whole thing was supposed to be in the first movie, as it was in the book, but they didn’t have the time/budget to add it in till the second movie, but then as she commented Spielberg had the San Diego plan instead, so they put in in the 3rd movie, but apparently everyone hates the 3rd movie for reasons, so they did it again in Jurassic world, The pteranodons where always supposed to be a major dinosaur character
TheKsalad The big-game hunter wanted to take the T-Rex back with him as a prize, or was told not to kill it by the nephew. Ian's daughter was saving both her and Sarah's lives.
Well I don't think the big game Hunter could get to his extra ammo (assuming he actually brought more than 2 rounds.) but I guess the only thing he had that could bring down a Rex were tranquilizers. I don't think he had a choice since mr. Earth first guy took his bullets.
K Damon I honestly don't see the big deal about the raptor falling for "Hey, you!" All animals respond to sound, it didn't need to actually understand what she said.
SO glad you removed a sin for Sarah lying on the window that's about to break. Honestly the number one thing that stuck with me about this film -- such an awesome intense part.
Allegedly, an early script draft said it was Raptors who killed the ship's crew, then in turn were killed by the T Rex, or whatever reason to avert having Raptors in the city. It's still stupid, though.
Joseph Nunn Yeah. Honestly there are so many questions about that boat that it really just makes the whole San Diego portion of the movie just seem useless.
Joseph Nunn they could make a whole movie of raptors in a city. in the end though the raptors need to win by an extremely large margin. :) then 20 years later would be pt. 2 where Predators come and hunt there for the lolz. :)
That's still a massively stupid idea, to the point where it nullifies any of the tension your supposed to feel. Why not just dock the ship as normal, then maybe some guy didn't give the t-rex enough tranquillizer, so he breaks out then goes on rampage.
Sin 7: The Raptor being moved into the enclosure at the beginning of the first movie was being moved from Isla Sorna. The Embryos on Isla Nublar were basically insurance in case anything happened to the Embryos on Site B. The Eggs present on Isla Nublar during the first movie were only there because there was going to be visitors, and Hammond wanted to impress the investors via Gennaro. The entire lab on Isla Nublar was basically a movie set for visitors to look at.
@@borismuller86 well no, because the eggs in the lab weren't theirs. They didn't lay them, so they don't even know they exist. They were just trying to escape because they wanted out
King Vulturo It's how it managed to travel, oh let's say 100 miles unmanned, and still hit the dock smack bang, dead on, that has me baffled. Edit: Crap, just figured it out. GPS linked autopilot. Damn you Garmin!
King Vulturo I think I remember reading that there was supposed to be this chameleon-esque dinosaur that had got on to the boat and killed the crew, but they cut out the scenes for some reason.
Ed Hickey That's right. The Carnotaurus had super stealth powers in the second book. That's actually my favorite portion of the second book but there was no mass death ship scene in it.
The T-Rex didn't kill the people on the boat. There was part of the script that got cut (no idea why) where the raptors got onto the boat and killed everyone and got off before it took off. How it auto piloted all the way back to San Diego by itself I have no fucking idea.
***** Clearly, one of the raptors also had his large commercial transport license, and piloted the ship back just to bail off before making landfall. Yea... yea, that's what happened. =D
When Ian Malcom said "Follow the screams", you should have added an outtake (?) with Ron from Chamber of Secrets saying "Why couldn't it be follow the butterflies".
11:54 Another sin: In the first Jurassic Park, the T-Rex was fast enough to catch up with a Jeep driving at top speed, but here it has trouble keeping up with a small group of people who aren't even running that fast? What the hell's slowing it down?!
Awesomo You took that from Nostalgia Critic. And is actually wrong: if you see closely, you can tell that t rex takes it´s time to reach top speed. It didn´t cacthed up with Malcom in the first movie at the raining scene, why she should in this one?. Not to be anoying or anything, I´m just trying to answer your question ;)
For those who haven't read the book, Eddy (Who's completely different than he is in the movie) is the one who brings the trailer. He is told by Sarah (who is not stupid in the book) to shoot it because it won't survive. He ends up bringing it to the trailer without them knowing and she only helps because it's already there and to satisfy Eddy.
Lol mom fuckwit yanks.. And u call petrol gas and freeze in December while in Australia we have December in summer which means we can drink a ice cold beer on a hot Xmas morning while u gronks drink egg nog..i still don't know wtf egg nog is
Nearly everyone you want to see die in this movie doesn't and movie makes you want to see them survive for some reason even though they are causing all the problems that cause all the dying. Yeah, I love animals, dinosaurs especially and would likely kill for the chance to see a real live one, but if setting them free is going to basically fuck over not only my survival odds as well as those of the only people that could get me off that island in one piece, I am not going to stop the guys from catching them for their zoo.
TheBelieveit1 you realize that the zoo would be in a public place, and therefore if the Dino's escaped there, more people would be hurt than on the island?
13:12 If you were reaching for a piece of bacon when suddenly another piece of bacon yells at you while swinging from a light fixture, I'm pretty sure you'd forget about that first bacon strip for a minute.
Does anyone feel that some characters, like Eddie and Ajay, did not deserve to die. They were both brutally ripped apart by dinosaurs just to save some idiots.
ultilinium8 there is a TH-cam channel that goes into details about these things and you’ll feel so upset about how great the lost world could have been
The rifle roland had was what is known an elephant gun, and considering that those shells would be heavy he would've had Ajay carrying them, so due to Ajay running off with the other hunters roland had to resort to the tranq rifle since his hunting ammo would have been with his hunting partner
If I was sent to an island with dinosaurs I'd carry more then two rounds on me. Even if one cartridge weighs 100g. I'd at least carry five or ten. An elephant may charge you, a tyrannosaurus might eat you whole.
Our "heroes" let a bunch of dangerous animals out of their cages which then proceeded to rampage around a campsite, probably injuring and possibly killing several people.
10:56 dieter didn't get away because compys ( the dinos that killed him) have a poison that takes away your ability to move slowly, after they bite you, so dieter would've gotten away if not for this.
You've missed a core rule to CinemaCins. The Books Do Not Matter. There is never any referral or evidence to them having hallucinogenic venom within the film, and so they do not.
Funny how noone who wasn't wearing headphones didn't hear him calling while taking a piss right behind them in the trees. Also how did deter get lost that quick
I think those little dinosaurs ate a baby in the book. Don't worry, that wasn't a spoiler, it happens in the first few chapters before anyone gets to the island. But here's a *spoiler*: Those same little dinosaur also eat John Hammond, the park founder, and he was a major dick in the book. They cuddly grandpa'd him up for the movie.
***** Okay. I've only read the first one then. And I knew who wrote it. I've read Next and The Andromeda Strain and some of his short stories, too. Usually when someone mentions details a book, they've read it and have a faint idea who the author is, just saying.
JackieGoOutside This IS TH-cam, after all... there's plenty of people here who will talk at length about things they have no actual knowledge about. It pays to hedge bets.
JackieGoOutside You go fix that right now. Second book is almost as good as the first which is quite a feat. It's definitely one of the few worth paying extra for hardback.
@@jurassicworldmemefeaturesi993 He kept some of the embryos in the lab, again probably just to show how the process worked. They showed that the dinosaurs could breed in the wild, all of the stuff in the tour lab was probably kept there as a proof of concept.
@@Thiterest1 but they didn't know that the dinosaurs were able to breed in the wild. In fact, Hammond specifically said that they can't, because they're all the same sex. But I agree that it would make sense to keep some of the embryos locally. Remember, these are volcanic islands. Any disaster recovery plan would call for keeping any mission critical data and materials backed up in multiple locations, on different islands.
@@randallulrich remember that Hammond is a businessman, he ran a flea circus so I think it would be safe to assume that he could have said that to impress the visitors. But in actuality Hammond never IMPRINTED on them like with Owen and the raptors, or maybe even been there for the birth of every creature because he was about to miss during the tour
there's a deleted scene or some shit where velociraptors sneak onto the ship and eat the entire crew. that's apparently what happened, it wasn't the t rex. still stupid as hell and leaves a giant hole in what happened
+marlon clark I think it was storyboarded. It was a reference to the first book, where some raptors sneak onto a supply ship, and they need to radio it to tell them to not go to the main land.
Or maybe it's supposed to be one of those, "suspense", things that makes the audience wonder about what happened. Nothing wrong with that, and it's been done countless times either with a reveal, like in The Mummy Returns, or not, like in this.
At 5:24 the noose was already being put on the dino via the the pole just frames later... the rifle shot some sort of sedative or tranquilizer, that’s why it gave up and collapsed, it was pretty clear - bad sin
I think the reason the guy said "30 minutes! That's half an hour!" is so the person he was talking to wouldn't mistake what he said for thirteen minutes
+Carl Bryant As an ex Navy something or other I second that, communications can be a bitch that's why they made up the system to say things like "Tree" instead of "Three"
Things that show up in Jurassic park movies almost always: -Nice dinosaurs always shown first -1 or more idiot(s) that somehow live long. -that idiot that dies -that really unbelievably smart kid -someone who has an extensive knowledge and like of dinosaurs. -that idiot who doesn't know sh*t about dinosaurs -that idiot that yells when they shouldn't -RAPTORS! -slightly harmed children who never die!(which is good) -that idiot who wants to "use" dinosaurs for profit/war/other. -Things from the other films that bring an overdose of nostalgia! -complicated relationships -BIG DINO FIGHT! -TYRANNOSAURUS REX! -WATER! -MORE NOSTALGIA! -JUMP SCARES! -GUNS! - ISLANDS! -SCIENCE! - ESCAPING! -Only one/few guy(s) dies and everyone else is okay -sympathy for dinosaurs -hatred for dinosaurs -bad security -MUSIC NOSTALGIA! -birds -eggs -professional ladies with a sense of humor -hats -up-close dramatic face shots -REFERENCES THAT CAUSE DOWNPOURS OF NOSTALGIA -labs and tools from the first movie -rain -mud -boats/planes/helicopters/cars/jeeps -that idiot that is an idiot -dramatic exiting -raptors gang up on the humans -backpacks! -pterodactyls -horrible yet funny deaths. anything I missed?
@@ShotsofVictory okay so how did the TREX eat the guys body n leave the arm on thr wheel in the control deck where he would never fit in a million years? Raptors is the real explanation.
I like how cinemasins points out the Heisenberg uncertainty principle but not the fact that Sarah said that they were not going to interact with the animals after she literally touched one of them
4:04 Ian Malcom is a mathmatician who specifically does research in chaos theory so feeling the need to explain the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle to a paleontologist like Sarah who probably never studied quantum mechanics isn't totally unreasonable. Just because they both have PhDs doesn't mean they both know everything.
Except that it’s also completely irrelevant to the matter at hand. It isn’t some general principle of observation affecting animals, it’s a very specific result about particles at a quantum level. Definitely pop sci cringe moment.
The point of the sin isn't "she's a scientist so she'd know this", it's that there's absolutely no reason for Malcolm to mention it at all as has no relevance to their situation. It's purely there to allow the movie to use some jargon.
Interesting facts about Jurassic Park: The real life Velociraptors were the size of Turkeys. The Raptors in the movies are based on Achillobators. The makers of this movie believed that Velociraptor sounded more frightening, and they were right. The Tyrannosaurus Rex is well depicted in these movies but isn't accurate e.g the real one didn't have ridges above its eyes, was slightly smaller and certainly not the largest carnivorous Dinosaur. Apparently those people eaten on the boat were originally supposed to be attacked by the Raptors, but due to budgeting and the lack of a reason for the Raptors to not remain on the boat, caused this "plot hole fix" to be scrapped.
The Trex isnt well dpicted, reall trex had feathers(not as much as other theropods) and the raptors in the movie are based on utharaptor; the largest raptor and troodon; belived to be the most inteligent dinosaur
Jesus Ramirez Romo It was well depicted at the time though. We didn't know about the feathers until years later. As for Jurassic World....eh, its what people know. Also T-Rexes and Raptors were probably fatter and not nearly as scary looking.
Ali Syed The velociraptors were intended to refer to Deinonychus, which in addition to being the right size, was, at the time, known as Velociraptor antirrhopus. This is stated explicitly in the book.
That's actually where I got that piece of information from. Straight up Google "Raptors in Jurassic Park novel" and you'll see it's the Achillobator rather than the Deinonychus. It's an easy mistake that I've made in the past as well so it's fine man
It definitely wasn't horrible it just wasn't anywhere near as good as the original and, in my opinion, not as worthy a sequel as Jurassic World was. I think the Jurassic Park film series should release a new movie every 20 years or so when there's a big jump in technology because a ton of the greatness of the original and world comes from amazing visuals.
Especially when two mercenaries were killed in 8 minutes. No, actually screw that example; Especially when an entire army of InGen mercenaries were cut down in less than two days.
Sin number 31, that's not even the uncertainty principle. That's the observer effect. Uncertainty says we can't know both the location and momentum of an object perfectly. Observer says if you look at something it changes the outcome.
Hypok When I first saw JP II oh so many years ago and Malcolm said that I was all "WHAT IN THE F@#KY F@#K?!?!" Screenwriters fail at basic research - *DING DING*
Hypok And even worse, that's not even how the observer effect works. It Mostly with particle and quantum physics where we have very limited ways of measuring things and the "observer" is a photon interacting with an electron. Looking at a dinosaur from far away would in no way change its state. So double fail for more useless techno-babble.
Connor McLeod No, it was just a joke. It was obvious that the uncertainty principle had nothing to do with it. "Uncertainty says we can't know both the location and momentum of an object perfectly. " Not quite: it says that we can't *prepare* a quantum particle in a state whose positions and momenta are both known to arbitrary accuracy. If all you want to do is to _measure_ the particle's position and momenta and you don't care what happens afterwards, you can do it.
0:36 I was 4 I guess, when I first watched the movie. I thought the dinosaur bit the girl and she turned into Ian Malcom(because I also watched Spider-Man around the same time ) and that's why her mom screamed at Ian Malcolm. 😂😂😂
5:17 The guy on the driver's left-hand side has a pole with the wire lasso running through it. He is shown reaching out and snagging the _Pachycephalosaurus_ immediately before it cuts to the guy firing the gun (which is *obviously* a tranquilizer, since the animal then starts wobbling around and is easily captured). The wire then apparently unhooks from the pole so it can be reeled in by the winch that it was *always connected to.*
I got the 33th like. 33 is one number so add another 3 to the end. I put three other numbers, so times the actual number by 2! 666! HOLY SHT ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED
Sin 7 is actually explained in the book: The process to create 1 viable egg was to go through 80 bad eggs. It had literally 1000+ feet of conveyor belts that pumped out egg after egg. They also had to make sure that the dinosaurs didnt have any late forming developmental issues, causing issues on isla nubar (you dont want a t-rex falling over dead from a lysine defficiency during a tour)
The movie editing joke with malcolm standing there when the woman screams in the beginning was the best thing about this movie. And most of these 'sins' aren't really sins. Not even nitpicking
The thing with the pterodactyls bugged me a little, but I knew the answer only because I was a dino-nerd growing up. Basically, unlike birds who have the wings and muscles to allow "true" flight, pterodactyls are purely gliders. And there's no danger of them really getting off the island because the island is waaaaay to far away from the mainland for them to make it (the closest island is 120 miles from any mainland. Heck a lot of normal birds would have trouble with that). There's no way they could get that far just gliding. Its a simple physical limitation of the animals. Which makes me wonder why they bother with the cage in the next movie. I assume just so they don't eat the tourists?
But… this isn’t true. Pterosaurs were indeed capable of true flight. They, insects, birds and bats are the four groups to evolve it. Some may have flown global distances. And even the ones in the film are clearly not just gliding - where from? www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/101015-science-giant-pterosaurs-longest-nonstop-flight-distance-record#:~:text=Large%20pterosaurs%20may%20have%20been,explore%20a%20prehistoric%20time%20line).
@@madisonlink7141 True. This old comment was based on outdated info at the time, mostly the belief that Pteranodons were thermal gliders (like condors), and needed the thermal updrafts to gain flight, something you don't have over the open ocean. This was absolutely the belief/info when I was younger, and scientists didn't adjust it until more recent years. It is now believed that most Pteranodons were dynamic gliders (like the albatross), and could in fact travel over long expanses of ocean. That said, the things in the Jurassic Park movies are just like most of InGen's creations, they're movie monsters. Cause they seemed to be trying to combine aspects of Pterodactyls with Pteranodons. The most notable being that while I assume they were going for Pteranodons overall, with their size and head crest, real Pteranodons did not have teeth, and did not have grasping claws/feet. In fact, the name Pteranodon means "wing without tooth", to set them apart from Pterodactyls. Apparently, like many other things, the makers of the film went back and claimed it was a unique species in the movies, engineered by Ingen, so lord knows if they followed the same rules of flight as their real-world counterparts. But hey, I don't mind admitting my info back when I made the original comment was outdated, and based on the old way scientists viewed their flight abilities. (Not sure if I should change the original post though, I always thought that would be kind of weird, so I'm just noting it here I guess.)
My favourite part is how "don't touch anything" Paleontologist Sarah Harding pets a baby dinosaur then shoves a camera in said dino's face, thereby inciting the parents to attack then later basks in the blood of an infant T-Rex to mend its leg with a plaster cast (and gum) without any resistance to the idea whatsoever just so we can get a dino attacks later on at the camp site.
TheElijahTalk Up until the end, with the dino in the city, this was the book Michael Crichton wrote. That is why I loved it. Then they went to the city . . . and I died a little inside.
For those that didn't know how all the crew members on the ship actually died, it was a pack of velocirapters that invaded the ship as it was leaving and killed everyone and as the ship crashed into the harbour in the corner of the screen you was meant to see a few velocirapters jump of the ship, the scenes was cut out the movie as they feard it would create confusion as to what happend to the raptors after they jumped off. which created even more confusion because now it looks like the Rex did escape killed everyone with no damage to the ship and lock its self in the container hold again. in short they cut bits out of the movie and didn't explain properly as to what happend to the crew.
Maybe those velociraptors got captured and were trained eventually by Chris Pratt and the lost world raptors are the same as the Jurassic world Dino's ehh maybe
@@maxhydekyle2425 I know this is way past late but it is just a theory and that concept art with the raptor and the guy with the flashlight could have been for a different seen cause when Sarah Dr Malcom and hs daughter were being attacked by raptors the other guy (completely forgot his name) was supposed to be with them and at the time he had a flashlight also-ran we never see the other side of wheel house it could have been torn off by the t Rex something to support that is that the hand that was left was his or her right hand the side they entered the room on
I think screenwriter David Koepp wanted that scene in which he's eaten by the T-Rex, because he was against the San Diego finale. Therefore, it's a pretty cool joke.
Tool0GT92 Malcolm has no daughter in the book, the white girl and black boy are helping another scientist guy that goes to the island and gets lost, Malcolm happanes to know him and decide to go look for him, AND he and the kids know the guy that was making the treailers, AND that guy getting lost is actually the reason why they went to the island and how the kids got mixed in the plot. That was long -_- I really wish they followed the book more...
Tool0GT92 Yeah, pretty much. I'm 99% sure Ian Malcom pulled a Princess Bride and said that he was "mostly dead" or some shit like that. I'm not paraphrasing, I think he actually uses that phrase. Still a good read, though. I remember enjoying it more than the original book, but that's just me.
Tool0GT92 ryrysteam It is never said in the first book that he died. They have vague hints that he might have died, but nothing is officially announced. At the begining of the second book we learn that Malcolm spent almost a year in a hospital in Costa Rica and had multiple surgeries, *almost died*, and was left crippled. All the others involved were kept in the dark and went on with their lives, not knowing he was actually alive until he could finally go back home. He never tries to break the confidentiality contract. He never told anyone about what happened or about the dinos, in fact he denies all rumors about the incident, because InGen was paying all his medical bills for two years of treatments that he needed after what happened...
at 5:13, the wire around the pachy's neck didn't come from the gun, the guy sitting in the chair on the side of the vehicle put it around the pachy's neck using a long pole. The gun simply fired a tranq dart to make capture of the pachy easier. -1 sin for Lost World and +1 sin for CinemaSins
another sin, 10 seconds after the guy gets eaten, Malcolm shows up. Did that trex forget there were more ppl in there? and how did Malcolm manage to get inside the waterfall without the rex seeing him?
Like dogs, lots of dinosaurs are *Color Blind* and have a very *Bad Memory* . Think about it. Go up to you cat slash dog, and put on something there not used to. Like glasses. And they freak out when you touch them.
6:48 I was freakin' 6 when this movie came out, and even THEN, I knew what two grown-ass adults were doing was stupid/suicidal as hell. Dr. Harding is supposed to be an animal behaviorist who studies African predators, and Nick Van Owen is supposed to be an experienced documentarian, having covered wars in Rwanda and Bosnia. Both of these people should bloody well know better than to take an injured T-Rex youngling into their compound, Harding because of her background in animal -freaking-behavior and Owen because, let's be honest here, even if he hadn't had any experience dealing with rescue missions to retrieve POW's and helping injured soldiers off of the battlefield (even just freaking filming it is better than nothing), at the very least, his adult brain should take a look at the situation in front of them, remember that a Tyrannosaurs is 13 feet tall, 40 feet long, 7.5 tons, and his mind and body should collectively shit itself at the idea of taking said youngling into their FUCKING TRAILER. So thank you, CinemaSins. You've taken an argument that I've had since I was an elementary school kid and made it stand out in glorious 480p. Because HD makes my computer complain.
For all the faults in the movie, the suspense of the trailer scene always stayed with me. That might actually be my very favourite scene of the JP series.
I think the only reason they put that very unnecessary scene with the little girl getting attacked into this movie was because it was a crucial starting point for the plot in the first book. Thinking about it, Jurassic Park two and three consist of about 70% of ideas from the first book which weren't used in the first one. For example the waterfall scene, the whole driving around on a boat in the third one, the Pteranodon attack of the third one and many more.
What happened to Ian's other two kids? Remember people, in a jeep scene in the first movie when he was asked about having kids, he replied three, one is here, where are the others?
Compys have a venomous bite that impairs its victims. This is shown in-movie by first have Dieter fight off his attackers and chase after them with no problem. Later he is shown stumbling until he finally falls and starts drinking from the stream to soothe his swelling and aching throat(more evidence later in the scene) before looking confused when the first compy jumps on his back. As Dieter begins to climb over the log not only is he panting but he is also wheezing noticeably(aforementioned swollen and sore throat). There is a convenient branch that catches Dieter's gun when he falls and despite you showing that scene it doesn't get sinned. For both that and your inattentiveness to the Compy situation I give CinemaSins +2 Sins.
Jazaray the books do matter. A much more appropriate statement would be that just because it’s in the books is not an excuse to not mention it in the movies.
@@NCC1371 In relation to the Cinema Sins channel, the books do not matter. They do not mention it in the movie, therefore that didn't exist in the movie's universe.
What about the fact that the first established that the T-Rex vision was mainly focused on movement. So when Dr. Grant and what's her name sat still, the T-Rex couldn't see them. Yet now, the second movie establishes that the T-Rex can see perfectly and even spot the guy in the truck and that he is food, they can also smell perfectly, making you unable to hide from them. Or that when the T-Rex's had already eaten the guy from the truck, so they wouldn't come immediately back to feed again. Some time would pass. But in San Diego, all it does is go around to search out food.
The T-Rex vision was never established in the first book, it was theorised by Grant and then completely repudiated in the second book by Malcolm. The T-Rex can see fine, Grant was just lucky in the first book because the T-Rex had just fed and wasn't interested in eating Grant, which is why it left. In San Diego, the T-Rex was in a completely new world that it was not familiar in, you can make the argument that it 'freaked out' like anyone would if they were drugged and woke up somewhere completely alien to them.
"The T-Rex can see fine, Grant was just lucky in the first book because the T-Rex had just fed and wasn't interested in eating Grant, which is why it left." Had just fed on what?
While the movie could have done a better job explaining this, in the Lost World book they actually lampshade the whole "Its sight is based on movement thing" (which had been archaeologically refuted between the making of the first book and the second book), and then they actually make a character's death in the Lost World (book) due to him thinking he would be invisible to the T-Rex by standing still.
@@taoliu3949 Plus it had been drugged, it searched for water(the pool), then Sarah said it would search for food. They had basically overdosed the rex, so it was in overdrive. Only thing that distracted it, was the baby.
I’m surprised that around the 10 minute mark he didn’t mention how they feel the need to WALK to the facility and totally ignore the fact that the InGen people came to the island with an entire fleet of fast, all terrain/off road vehicles from motorbikes to hummers
Anyone else annoyed by the fact that Velociraptors depicted in this movie aren't actually Velociraptors, but instead bare a closer resemblance to Utahraptors, yet no one decides to address this?
+Kid_Scion velociraptors had feathers on their arms but not a lot so they were flightless, I think they also had feathers on their face and tails. I can't remember the other traits :/ you can google "accurate velociraptor" if you're curious :D
Nightcore Char No you're right, they did have feathers. In JP3 they kinda acknowledged this by having the little things on the top of their heads. I've always assumed they were feathers anyways.
+Frisbee These aren't accurate dinos, they keep reminding us that these are mutants, since they used other reptile DNA to complete their genome sequence and actually create them. So of course many dinos don't look accurate, chances are none could ever recreate a Dino 100%. All JP dinos are mutants
+Nightcore Char Velociraptors are actually about a meter tall (the specifics escape me and my laziness to not look up the exact height). The raptors in JP are called "Velociraptor" purely because it sounds cooler than "Utahraptor". I think they side step this in Jurassic World by not actually naming the kind of raptor.
He's personally responsible for every single death in this movie. He's the one who let all those dinosaurs loose which caused them to destroy that group to lose their radio and other equipment that could have gotten them out of there. He's the one who went after the baby t-rex, freed it and brought it back to their trailer, causing the parents to show up and destroy it as well as kill their totally innocent dude who tried to save them. Because Nick got that other group's shit destroyed they had to trek all the way to that facility which meant that they had to have that run in with the Compsignathus, the T-rexes and the raptors. He took out that guy's bullets preventing him from killing that T-rex who squished one guy and ate another. All those guys who went through that place with the raptors, again had to cause all their equipment was destroyed by Nick. And then they had to tranq the T-rex and bring it over to San Francisco instead of killing it like it was planned and that T-rex ate at least 2 people (the baby ate one) and caused who knows how ever many deaths from people panicing as well as all the damages. And he's one of the heroes remember?
Koepp says that when writing the movie he was partially inspired by his favourite song, "Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner" by Warren Zevon. The song is about a mercenary named Roland who is betrayed by man named Van Owen.
He does. His actions while well intentioned led to unfoseen events. "That's uh tha'ts chaos theory". They tried to call back in the 3rd film, but fumbled badly
That´s kinda the joke. Although most sins dont make sens and are easily explainable, its somehow fun to watch a dude that complains about everything haha
Franco Parnetti Ha, yes, this is accurate. I agree with this statement. You have a good point, good sir. I mean, even THEY don't really dislike most of the movies they sin. They've done a lot of movies they personally love, and/or that they acknowledge as beautifully done overall, like Wall-E, but most of their videos are of decent films like this one where it's not the best movie in the world but it doesn't suck too hard either. You know that a movie really does suck when you can hear the narrator actually getting mad. And somehow those are the most entertaining ones. Like the DBZ Evolution one? First sin, right out of the gate: "I can already tell I'm gonna hate this movie" LOL
A nitpick that actually reaches all the way back to the books: Velociraptor is only about the size of a chicken and probably more like the Compsognathus (i.e. the little green guys that ate that one bad guy), what they actually should be is Utahraptors which fit the size and is from the same family, but I guess Velociraptor sounded cooler :)
Carter: "Yeah, we're being hunted by giant carnivorous dinosaurs, but I'm going to jam out to my Walkman and be oblivious to everything around me."
Yeah Ludlow spared no expense on these highly skilled professional hunters
Just like a certain someone on a single IT guy
@@BadassHater1 is there any chance you‘re talking about a lovely old man who never spares any expenses??
@@smoothcriminal9354 imagine RAPTOR walking upto this guy and trying to listen touching the earpiece.
@@hamzaahmad1345 they could open doors who’d be surprised if they didn’t figure out how to use the Walkman too
Also product placement
Sarah Harding: We're here to observe and not interact.
Also Sarah: (takes in baby t-rex and fixes its leg)
it was nick who took it in but sarah did fix his leg
Don't forget she had just finished petting one
@@chris-tm8ok your not wrong
Also Sarah Harding: Touches baby stegosaurus and takes it's picture like a pedo, causing the parents to go into murder mode and nearly kill everyone.
But she did touch a baby stegosaurus when she is supposed to ‘not interact’
Hidden lore from the book: The compys are slightly venomous and the venom actually causes hallucinations, this would cause dieter to become weaker and weaker. The girl was saved by her parents.
The Bowman incident was in the first book
@@SHOOPY2021 Yes, and that scene was from the book
And Camp Cretaceous confirms this novel lore to be canon :D
Considering Hammond also dies from the Compies too
sure help her while there's dangerous dinosaurs near by 7:14
It always bugged me when Sarah said in a really snooty way they are there to observe and not to interact after almost getting killed because she just had to touch a baby dinosaur
Knows about predators but wears a bloody jacket ...
@@nata3467 exactly, that character was a contradiction
not to mention all that candy shit spread all around their tent camp
@@SabrinaLWilliamsShe is the single stupidest character I've ever seen in a blockbuster movie, if only because she's supposed to be an expert and always seems to conveniently forget all of her expertise and knowledge when she needs it the most. By all rights, she should've been eaten. She certainly deserved it.
That wasnt her
Sin for poor Eddie's last words he hears being a fast food order given sarcastically.
The last words he heard were "We're sliding Eddie!" You uncultured potato.
Spencer Bricklord47 take it easy mate, la vie est belle
When I was a child, about 5, I literally thought they wanted that order 😅🤣 so dumb.
@@javavita ?? i dont even know how to replay to that
@@dannyplayz3232 you don’t have to “rEPLaY” (it’s “reply”) to that 🥸
Aw, the mother and father T-Rex tearing the man in half were reenacting the Lady and the Tramp spaghetti scene....
James Haines LOL best comment ever. And i want to ask you, which T-rex do you think is the mother? I have a strong instinct saying the one on the right is the mother because it is more curvy...?
Idalecio Female T. rexes were generally larger.
***** ... and sexier with that scaly and brownish green skin.
Brad, please. #StopBradLayne2015
***** Hot ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) T Rex porn
I always felt sorry for Eddie in this movie. He didn't deserve to die like that.
He was the only likeable guy in the whole film.
@@ridensroom6957 Ian was kinda likable too
Idk, Nick and Sarah were likeable, too.@@ridensroom6957
At least he got a cool death
And he was helpful!!!!
The scene with the compies on the beach attacking a young girl was actually a loose adaptation of something that happened in the original Jurassic Park novel. As a matter of fact, that young girl survived, too, just with some serious and somewhat-poisoned bites on her arm that the doctors managed to treat successfully. In the book it actually went somewhere, though, as the girl drew a picture of the "lizards" that attacked her and a doctor's assistant later recognized it as a dinosaur; the doctor scoffed at the notion, but the assistant took initiative behind his back and contacted Alan Grant about it. So weirdly, in the book, Grant and Sattler had a notion that dinosaurs were alive, in some capacity, before they found out what Isla Nublar was actually for. That wasn't the only thing the compies were doing in the beginning of the novel, though; they were also sneaking around mainland Costa Rica, biting helpless infants and old people where they could get at them.
Also in the book, John Hammond (a much less likeable guy in the novel version of his portrayal) tripped, got hurt, and was subsequently eaten to death by the compies. Ironic justice, woo-hoo.
The One True Nobody! The books were pretty good weren’t they?
@@mrmism7451 That they were.
Same sin as aliens. +50sins for making me do homework.
Oh yeah! I remember that now. I thought that it sounded familiar. The book was awesome.
M.R. MISM I enjoyed the books, however especially in the first one they were even less scientifically accurate than the films. (Although I guess you have to forgive Michael Crichton for that since they are pretty old and it was decently accurate for that time).
What bugged me about them was how tiring some of Ian‘s speeches were. In the films it‘s nice to hear him go on about chaos theory every so often but in the books it can get a little much, since it‘s all he seems to talk about and can actually go on for several paragraphs. Other than that a great read though.
Best line is delivered from that Roland guy "This is a game trail, you want to set up a base camp or a buffét" LMAO
"this guy is screaming at nothing until in the next shot a raptor finally takes mercy on him and eats him so his scream wouldn't be in vain"
Best line in the whole video...
Jurassic park-Lost world
Jurassic world-Lost park
Jurassic Lost - World Park
Park Jurassic - World Lost
Jurassic Lost - Park World
World Jurassic- Park lost
Lost World - Jurassic Park
wait...
LOL-- The San Diego scene was a Spielberg idea! The original ending was for Malcolm and the group to escape from pterodactyls. But Spielberg really, REALLY wanted to bring the T. Rex to the mainland. He knew this was the last Jurassic Park movie he would direct, and he wanted to film his own version of King Kong/Godzilla.
That's why the entire 3rd act is so tonally different. It all come from Spielberg's doing.
So, they put the attacked by pterodactyls plot in JP 3 ? 🤔
Randal Graves the whole thing was supposed to be in the first movie, as it was in the book, but they didn’t have the time/budget to add it in till the second movie, but then as she commented Spielberg had the San Diego plan instead, so they put in in the 3rd movie, but apparently everyone hates the 3rd movie for reasons, so they did it again in Jurassic world, The pteranodons where always supposed to be a major dinosaur character
Right because that came out of nowhere lmao
@@oddballskull1941 I like jp3. Always just wish it was longer. Love how more modern it seemed to the first 2
@@yourbabytee what came outta nowhere was the death of every crew member on that boat/crew ship lol
So they were NOT okay with shooting a rampaging T-rex, but okay with gymnastic kicking a raptor into a pit of spikes?
TheKsalad The big-game hunter wanted to take the T-Rex back with him as a prize, or was told not to kill it by the nephew. Ian's daughter was saving both her and Sarah's lives.
TheKsalad that gymnastic thing was so dumb. I don't know what's worse, that she successfully kicked a raptor or the raptor fell for "Hey! You!"
Well I don't think the big game Hunter could get to his extra ammo (assuming he actually brought more than 2 rounds.) but I guess the only thing he had that could bring down a Rex were tranquilizers. I don't think he had a choice since mr. Earth first guy took his bullets.
TheKsalad I guess it's the difference between killing a human baby and a full grown adult. Which one is more okay?
K Damon I honestly don't see the big deal about the raptor falling for "Hey, you!" All animals respond to sound, it didn't need to actually understand what she said.
SO glad you removed a sin for Sarah lying on the window that's about to break. Honestly the number one thing that stuck with me about this film -- such an awesome intense part.
Allegedly, an early script draft said it was Raptors who killed the ship's crew, then in turn were killed by the T Rex, or whatever reason to avert having Raptors in the city. It's still stupid, though.
Joseph Nunn Yeah. Honestly there are so many questions about that boat that it really just makes the whole San Diego portion of the movie just seem useless.
Honestly I always guessed it were the pterodactyls but could never figure out how they got inside and killed the captain.
Joseph Nunn they could make a whole movie of raptors in a city. in the end though the raptors need to win by an extremely large margin. :) then 20 years later would be pt. 2 where Predators come and hunt there for the lolz. :)
Joseph NunnHonestly raptors lose in the city would have been way more watchable than the T-rex.
That's still a massively stupid idea, to the point where it nullifies any of the tension your supposed to feel. Why not just dock the ship as normal, then maybe some guy didn't give the t-rex enough tranquillizer, so he breaks out then goes on rampage.
Sin 7: The Raptor being moved into the enclosure at the beginning of the first movie was being moved from Isla Sorna. The Embryos on Isla Nublar were basically insurance in case anything happened to the Embryos on Site B. The Eggs present on Isla Nublar during the first movie were only there because there was going to be visitors, and Hammond wanted to impress the investors via Gennaro. The entire lab on Isla Nublar was basically a movie set for visitors to look at.
I’m going to assume the reason the raptors kept trying to escape on Isla Nublar is they were trying to get their eggs back. Just like in JP3.
@@borismuller86 well no, because the eggs in the lab weren't theirs. They didn't lay them, so they don't even know they exist.
They were just trying to escape because they wanted out
I always did wonder how they all died on that ship. It just seemed so weird even when seeing it as a kid.
King Vulturo It's how it managed to travel, oh let's say 100 miles unmanned, and still hit the dock smack bang, dead on, that has me baffled.
Edit: Crap, just figured it out. GPS linked autopilot. Damn you Garmin!
King Vulturo I think I remember reading that there was supposed to be this chameleon-esque dinosaur that had got on to the boat and killed the crew, but they cut out the scenes for some reason.
King Vulturo I think in the book it was implied that either Velociraptors or the baby T-Rex got loose on the ship.
Ed Hickey That's right. The Carnotaurus had super stealth powers in the second book. That's actually my favorite portion of the second book but there was no mass death ship scene in it.
King Vulturo Hey that's on the shooter game
The T-Rex didn't kill the people on the boat. There was part of the script that got cut (no idea why) where the raptors got onto the boat and killed everyone and got off before it took off. How it auto piloted all the way back to San Diego by itself I have no fucking idea.
I see why it got cut out of the movie, it's fucking ludicrous.
Gabriel Rangel they could just say the pterodactyls did it and flew off
kazzy razz they could do it King Kong style and say it escaped afterwards. I don't know, the sequence is cool though.
***** Clearly, one of the raptors also had his large commercial transport license, and piloted the ship back just to bail off before making landfall.
Yea... yea, that's what happened. =D
***** Raptors in their off-time also like to play pirates / speed 2 and cruise control ships into piers! :)
When Ian Malcom said "Follow the screams", you should have added an outtake (?) with Ron from Chamber of Secrets saying "Why couldn't it be follow the butterflies".
That would be awesome XD
Ajay screaming "Don't go in to the tall grass!", then proceeds to run in to the tall grass.
Yet another victim of peer pressure.
11:54
Another sin: In the first Jurassic Park, the T-Rex was fast enough to catch up with a Jeep driving at top speed, but here it has trouble keeping up with a small group of people who aren't even running that fast? What the hell's slowing it down?!
Awesomo did the T-rex from the first movie actually got out-run by the jeep or did it just give up? Anyway that is a very good point
Traffic lights of course.....even t-Rex won't run a red light. I thought everyone knew this.
nuckinfuts s
deamn, you should've seen them when there is police coming
They even put their lil arms up
I think it caught up with them but gave up. Been a while since I last watched it.
Awesomo You took that from Nostalgia Critic. And is actually wrong: if you see closely, you can tell that t rex takes it´s time to reach top speed. It didn´t cacthed up with Malcom in the first movie at the raining scene, why she should in this one?. Not to be anoying or anything, I´m just trying to answer your question ;)
The Japanese men in the city say "we left Japan to get away from this" it's a comment on the TOHO Godzilla movies, not the American Godzilla
For those who haven't read the book, Eddy (Who's completely different than he is in the movie) is the one who brings the trailer. He is told by Sarah (who is not stupid in the book) to shoot it because it won't survive. He ends up bringing it to the trailer without them knowing and she only helps because it's already there and to satisfy Eddy.
"OCD Raptor" forgot to tap his claw 4 times before attacking the human.....
+1 Sin.
lol
One of the Japanese guys running from the t Rex if you translate it said "I left Tokyo for this" shameless Godzilla reference 4 sins
As silly as the San Diego Incident is, I always loved that they included a clear Godzilla reference.
You should never go in the tall grass without Pokemon
*Goes into the tall grass*
*A wild raptor pack appeared*
Yo mummy appears
Lol mom fuckwit yanks.. And u call petrol gas and freeze in December while in Australia we have December in summer which means we can drink a ice cold beer on a hot Xmas morning while u gronks drink egg nog..i still don't know wtf egg nog is
Trex use bite its super affected
Chris is not funny and can eat suka
"We're not here to interact " said Sarah who 5 minutes before was touching a freaking dinosaur goddamit she was the most useless character i ever seen
tiagovalen It's Julianne Moore! So we can forgive her.
Nearly everyone you want to see die in this movie doesn't and movie makes you want to see them survive for some reason even though they are causing all the problems that cause all the dying. Yeah, I love animals, dinosaurs especially and would likely kill for the chance to see a real live one, but if setting them free is going to basically fuck over not only my survival odds as well as those of the only people that could get me off that island in one piece, I am not going to stop the guys from catching them for their zoo.
TheBelieveit1 you realize that the zoo would be in a public place, and therefore if the Dino's escaped there, more people would be hurt than on the island?
Drago Jr No different really than any other zoo then.
TheBelieveit1 did you see the place they were going to put the dinosaurs in at San Diego? Not a place suitable for animals.
Kelly: "HEY YOU!"
Raptor: !
Kelly: "Omae wa mou shinderu."
Raptor: "NANI!?"
Underrated comment
13:12 If you were reaching for a piece of bacon when suddenly another piece of bacon yells at you while swinging from a light fixture, I'm pretty sure you'd forget about that first bacon strip for a minute.
I would never eat bacon strips again if one started yelling at me no matter where it is 😂
love the profile pic, come on West Ham! X
@@Mmm2567 Damn, this is an 8 year old comment! My profile pic has nothing to do with any sports team.
Does anyone feel that some characters, like Eddie and Ajay, did not deserve to die. They were both brutally ripped apart by dinosaurs just to save some idiots.
True
To be fair, Ajay didn't have to go into the tall grass. He could have gone back for Roland.
True. But... in the book theres....
*eD rEGiS*
I agree
ultilinium8 there is a TH-cam channel that goes into details about these things and you’ll feel so upset about how great the lost world could have been
Is it bad that I laughed when Jeremy said, "Okay honey, make a wish!"?
No. No it is not.
I wonder if they wished for the chance to travel to exotic far away places? Like San Fransisco, for example?
You certainly wouldn’t be alone.
No, I did too.
Its funny but is kinda bad, thst was one death in which the guy didn't deserve
The rifle roland had was what is known an elephant gun, and considering that those shells would be heavy he would've had Ajay carrying them, so due to Ajay running off with the other hunters roland had to resort to the tranq rifle since his hunting ammo would have been with his hunting partner
If I was sent to an island with dinosaurs I'd carry more then two rounds on me. Even if one cartridge weighs 100g. I'd at least carry five or ten. An elephant may charge you, a tyrannosaurus might eat you whole.
"We're here to observe and document, not interact."
...which is why I walked up to an infant and shoved my camera in it's face.
I took up gymnastics after this, in the hopes that someday, I could save people by hitting a dinosaur from the uneven bars with my feet........
Why would there even BE uneven bars in a deserted laboratory/shack like that???
Have you hit a dinosaur yet?
@@TheFlock83 asking the important questions
I have revived this comment.
...as one does.
Our "heroes" let a bunch of dangerous animals out of their cages which then proceeded to rampage around a campsite, probably injuring and possibly killing several people.
They are herbavourus
K1ll_c Herbivore just means they don't eat meat. They're still perfectly able (and willing) to kill said meat.
K1ll_c So are hippos, but that doesn't stop them from killing three thousand people a year.
Hippos only kill you if you call them fat. (Says defiantly reliable source (sarcasm))
K1ll_c Yeah, triceratops would never kill anyone on purpose or anything!
10:56 dieter didn't get away because compys ( the dinos that killed him) have a poison that takes away your ability to move slowly, after they bite you, so dieter would've gotten away if not for this.
I think you meant takes his ability to move quickly, not trying to be an ass but this comment is to prevent reader's confusion
@@benjamincastro6063 What I meant is that it slowly drains your motor control, thank you for pointing that out
You've missed a core rule to CinemaCins. The Books Do Not Matter. There is never any referral or evidence to them having hallucinogenic venom within the film, and so they do not.
@@TheSoulGambit Although you've got me beat, I still think that's a stupid rule.
Funny how noone who wasn't wearing headphones didn't hear him calling while taking a piss right behind them in the trees. Also how did deter get lost that quick
I think those little dinosaurs ate a baby in the book.
Don't worry, that wasn't a spoiler, it happens in the first few chapters before anyone gets to the island.
But here's a *spoiler*:
Those same little dinosaur also eat John Hammond, the park founder, and he was a major dick in the book. They cuddly grandpa'd him up for the movie.
JackieGoOutside Both actually happened in the first book. In fact they basically stole the book's cold open for the movie sequel, except aged up.
***** There's more than one book?
***** Okay. I've only read the first one then.
And I knew who wrote it. I've read Next and The Andromeda Strain and some of his short stories, too. Usually when someone mentions details a book, they've read it and have a faint idea who the author is, just saying.
JackieGoOutside This IS TH-cam, after all... there's plenty of people here who will talk at length about things they have no actual knowledge about. It pays to hedge bets.
JackieGoOutside You go fix that right now. Second book is almost as good as the first which is quite a feat. It's definitely one of the few worth paying extra for hardback.
they quite clearly explained the dino egg lab was a front purely for the tour. Sin absolved.
Yes but also consider the fact that Hammond kept the ACTUAL embryos on Nublar
@@jurassicworldmemefeaturesi993 He kept some of the embryos in the lab, again probably just to show how the process worked.
They showed that the dinosaurs could breed in the wild, all of the stuff in the tour lab was probably kept there as a proof of concept.
@@Thiterest1 but they didn't know that the dinosaurs were able to breed in the wild. In fact, Hammond specifically said that they can't, because they're all the same sex. But I agree that it would make sense to keep some of the embryos locally. Remember, these are volcanic islands. Any disaster recovery plan would call for keeping any mission critical data and materials backed up in multiple locations, on different islands.
True. But, "I insist on being here when they're born."
Hammond says this in the lab in the first movie.
@@randallulrich remember that Hammond is a businessman, he ran a flea circus so I think it would be safe to assume that he could have said that to impress the visitors. But in actuality Hammond never IMPRINTED on them like with Owen and the raptors, or maybe even been there for the birth of every creature because he was about to miss during the tour
there's a deleted scene or some shit where velociraptors sneak onto the ship and eat the entire crew. that's apparently what happened, it wasn't the t rex. still stupid as hell and leaves a giant hole in what happened
+Michael S. actaully that scene was never filmed
+marlon clark I think it was storyboarded. It was a reference to the first book, where some raptors sneak onto a supply ship, and they need to radio it to tell them to not go to the main land.
That was in the book
Or maybe it's supposed to be one of those, "suspense", things that makes the audience wonder about what happened. Nothing wrong with that, and it's been done countless times either with a reveal, like in The Mummy Returns, or not, like in this.
The concept art of the boat showed a cavity in the wall/roof where the Rex had torn through , but they didn't show it in the movie.
"They left their defenseless baby alone so they can Liam Neeson this poor bastard" 🤣
In the novel, they leave the baby in the safety of a tree before going back to attack the trailers.
At 5:24 the noose was already being put on the dino via the the pole just frames later... the rifle shot some sort of sedative or tranquilizer, that’s why it gave up and collapsed, it was pretty clear - bad sin
I think the reason the guy said "30 minutes! That's half an hour!" is so the person he was talking to wouldn't mistake what he said for thirteen minutes
which is totally understandable
Good point.
+Carl Bryant As an ex Navy something or other I second that, communications can be a bitch that's why they made up the system to say things like "Tree" instead of "Three"
+Carl Bryant Seeing as how radio communication back then was crap I can totally understand this
Things that show up in Jurassic park movies almost always:
-Nice dinosaurs always shown first
-1 or more idiot(s) that somehow live long.
-that idiot that dies
-that really unbelievably smart kid
-someone who has an extensive knowledge and like of dinosaurs.
-that idiot who doesn't know sh*t about dinosaurs
-that idiot that yells when they shouldn't
-RAPTORS!
-slightly harmed children who never die!(which is good)
-that idiot who wants to "use" dinosaurs for profit/war/other.
-Things from the other films that bring an overdose of nostalgia!
-complicated relationships
-BIG DINO FIGHT!
-TYRANNOSAURUS REX!
-WATER!
-MORE NOSTALGIA!
-JUMP SCARES!
-GUNS!
- ISLANDS!
-SCIENCE!
- ESCAPING!
-Only one/few guy(s) dies and everyone else is okay
-sympathy for dinosaurs
-hatred for dinosaurs
-bad security
-MUSIC NOSTALGIA!
-birds
-eggs
-professional ladies with a sense of humor
-hats
-up-close dramatic face shots
-REFERENCES THAT CAUSE DOWNPOURS OF NOSTALGIA
-labs and tools from the first movie
-rain
-mud
-boats/planes/helicopters/cars/jeeps
-that idiot that is an idiot
-dramatic exiting
-raptors gang up on the humans
-backpacks!
-pterodactyls
-horrible yet funny deaths.
anything I missed?
Nice point lol. Countless cliches for the whole series, Jurassic World included.
nope
Damn u should have your own yt channel
TheGamingGamer
lol.
They're PteroSAURS!
CinemaSins is exactly right: That whole ship thing was bothersome.
They were eaten by the t rex and a brave sole led the t rex back into his cage and a dieing person closed the cage
@@ShotsofVictory no in a scrapped script a pack of raptors came on board and killed everyone on the ship and jumped off before it left
@@JimmyDJDog who did it if there was no raptors on the ship on the real movie then? The T rex
@@ShotsofVictory okay so how did the TREX eat the guys body n leave the arm on thr wheel in the control deck where he would never fit in a million years? Raptors is the real explanation.
@@heartless604 were are the raptors then
I like how cinemasins points out the Heisenberg uncertainty principle but not the fact that Sarah said that they were not going to interact with the animals after she literally touched one of them
4:04 Ian Malcom is a mathmatician who specifically does research in chaos theory so feeling the need to explain the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle to a paleontologist like Sarah who probably never studied quantum mechanics isn't totally unreasonable. Just because they both have PhDs doesn't mean they both know everything.
Except that it’s also completely irrelevant to the matter at hand. It isn’t some general principle of observation affecting animals, it’s a very specific result about particles at a quantum level. Definitely pop sci cringe moment.
The point of the sin isn't "she's a scientist so she'd know this", it's that there's absolutely no reason for Malcolm to mention it at all as has no relevance to their situation. It's purely there to allow the movie to use some jargon.
… well … the heisenberg principle is basic stuff in natural science. 😅
@@finzenberger it's really not.
Interesting facts about Jurassic Park:
The real life Velociraptors were the size of Turkeys. The Raptors in the movies are based on Achillobators. The makers of this movie believed that Velociraptor sounded more frightening, and they were right.
The Tyrannosaurus Rex is well depicted in these movies but isn't accurate e.g the real one didn't have ridges above its eyes, was slightly smaller and certainly not the largest carnivorous Dinosaur.
Apparently those people eaten on the boat were originally supposed to be attacked by the Raptors, but due to budgeting and the lack of a reason for the Raptors to not remain on the boat, caused this "plot hole fix" to be scrapped.
The Trex isnt well dpicted, reall trex had feathers(not as much as other theropods) and the raptors in the movie are based on utharaptor; the largest raptor and troodon; belived to be the most inteligent dinosaur
Utahraptor is far too large and maybe troodon in the intelligence aspect but certainly not physically.
Jesus Ramirez Romo It was well depicted at the time though. We didn't know about the feathers until years later. As for Jurassic World....eh, its what people know. Also T-Rexes and Raptors were probably fatter and not nearly as scary looking.
Ali Syed The velociraptors were intended to refer to Deinonychus, which in addition to being the right size, was, at the time, known as Velociraptor antirrhopus. This is stated explicitly in the book.
That's actually where I got that piece of information from. Straight up Google "Raptors in Jurassic Park novel" and you'll see it's the Achillobator rather than the Deinonychus. It's an easy mistake that I've made in the past as well so it's fine man
"Do you want ants? Because that's how you get ants"
Archer reference
Wolf of Mercury not the song right?
Is this sour mix in a margarita, what is this meowchwitz
"... Because it has o. c. d." Hahahahahah.
Raptor o. c. d. That's so funny.
Yeah, debilitating diseases are hilarious.
for sure very debilitating serious illneses that affect people very negatively are hilarious hahaha cat cancer hahaha whale depression
+RwNZ1337 As someone with OCD: Yes, it was hilarious. It was pretty much the perfect OCD joke.
Even though it's not popular, I still like this movie.
It definitely wasn't horrible it just wasn't anywhere near as good as the original and, in my opinion, not as worthy a sequel as Jurassic World was. I think the Jurassic Park film series should release a new movie every 20 years or so when there's a big jump in technology because a ton of the greatness of the original and world comes from amazing visuals.
Don't worry, it's far more popular than Jurassic Park III, simply because JPIII is the worst.
well here's something, a lot of people have forgotten this movie existed
Exacly, I mean how did that kid survive 8 weeks!?
Especially when two mercenaries were killed in 8 minutes.
No, actually screw that example;
Especially when an entire army of InGen mercenaries were cut down in less than two days.
"I will choose...EVERYONE!", ded xD
The part that's always bothered me is dinosaurs being basically bulletproof.
well bears pretty much are
Sin number 31, that's not even the uncertainty principle. That's the observer effect. Uncertainty says we can't know both the location and momentum of an object perfectly. Observer says if you look at something it changes the outcome.
Lol, I just commented that too!
Hypok When I first saw JP II oh so many years ago and Malcolm said that I was all "WHAT IN THE F@#KY F@#K?!?!"
Screenwriters fail at basic research - *DING DING*
Hypok And even worse, that's not even how the observer effect works. It Mostly with particle and quantum physics where we have very limited ways of measuring things and the "observer" is a photon interacting with an electron. Looking at a dinosaur from far away would in no way change its state.
So double fail for more useless techno-babble.
Connor McLeod No, it was just a joke. It was obvious that the uncertainty principle had nothing to do with it.
"Uncertainty says we can't know both the location and momentum of an object perfectly. "
Not quite: it says that we can't *prepare* a quantum particle in a state whose positions and momenta are both known to arbitrary accuracy. If all you want to do is to _measure_ the particle's position and momenta and you don't care what happens afterwards, you can do it.
Survival quotient I'm not comfortable with - OMG, I love this guy's sense of humor
"9 inches of solid bone"
Your profile pic coupled with that comment.....
Plz gimme
Fucking Trevor Who tied it into a girl scout knot? I bet it was you. Moogle midgar x Fucking Trevor
Trust me, it's not nearly as great as it sounds.
0:36 I was 4 I guess, when I first watched the movie. I thought the dinosaur bit the girl and she turned into Ian Malcom(because I also watched Spider-Man around the same time ) and that's why her mom screamed at Ian Malcolm. 😂😂😂
Now that is amazing
I used to think she was screaming at Malcom XD
*that is fantastical*
Lol
😂😂😂
5:17 The guy on the driver's left-hand side has a pole with the wire lasso running through it. He is shown reaching out and snagging the _Pachycephalosaurus_ immediately before it cuts to the guy firing the gun (which is *obviously* a tranquilizer, since the animal then starts wobbling around and is easily captured). The wire then apparently unhooks from the pole so it can be reeled in by the winch that it was *always connected to.*
When I heard the little girl say "I don't like prawns." I really thought there was going to be a District 9 reference at the end of this video.
Jesse Sellman fookin prawns
Jesse Sellman _Afrikaans accent_ I Can't believe I get Payed to do this, I luv watching you Prawns Die!
I got the 33th like. 33 is one number so add another 3 to the end. I put three other numbers, so times the actual number by 2! 666! HOLY SHT ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED
...
Earlier when I was watching this today, and John Hammond said “this lost world” I yelled “ROLL CREDITS”
Despite the flaws in this movie(gymnastics scene) the tall grass is still one of my fav scenes in the franchise.
Sin 7 is actually explained in the book: The process to create 1 viable egg was to go through 80 bad eggs. It had literally 1000+ feet of conveyor belts that pumped out egg after egg. They also had to make sure that the dinosaurs didnt have any late forming developmental issues, causing issues on isla nubar (you dont want a t-rex falling over dead from a lysine defficiency during a tour)
The movie editing joke with malcolm standing there when the woman screams in the beginning was the best thing about this movie. And most of these 'sins' aren't really sins. Not even nitpicking
He's moved on from true 'movie sins' to anything annoying/stupid/original/etc.
The thing with the pterodactyls bugged me a little, but I knew the answer only because I was a dino-nerd growing up. Basically, unlike birds who have the wings and muscles to allow "true" flight, pterodactyls are purely gliders. And there's no danger of them really getting off the island because the island is waaaaay to far away from the mainland for them to make it (the closest island is 120 miles from any mainland. Heck a lot of normal birds would have trouble with that). There's no way they could get that far just gliding. Its a simple physical limitation of the animals. Which makes me wonder why they bother with the cage in the next movie. I assume just so they don't eat the tourists?
Fun Fact: *I THOUGHT ABOUT THIS IN SCIENCE CLASS*
What gets me with the pteranodons is why were they completely different in jp3
But… this isn’t true. Pterosaurs were indeed capable of true flight. They, insects, birds and bats are the four groups to evolve it. Some may have flown global distances. And even the ones in the film are clearly not just gliding - where from?
www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/101015-science-giant-pterosaurs-longest-nonstop-flight-distance-record#:~:text=Large%20pterosaurs%20may%20have%20been,explore%20a%20prehistoric%20time%20line).
Sure they could travel that distance by gliding. Look at Albatrosses. Dedicated gliders have *more* range than powered fliers, not *less*.
@@madisonlink7141 True.
This old comment was based on outdated info at the time, mostly the belief that Pteranodons were thermal gliders (like condors), and needed the thermal updrafts to gain flight, something you don't have over the open ocean. This was absolutely the belief/info when I was younger, and scientists didn't adjust it until more recent years. It is now believed that most Pteranodons were dynamic gliders (like the albatross), and could in fact travel over long expanses of ocean.
That said, the things in the Jurassic Park movies are just like most of InGen's creations, they're movie monsters. Cause they seemed to be trying to combine aspects of Pterodactyls with Pteranodons. The most notable being that while I assume they were going for Pteranodons overall, with their size and head crest, real Pteranodons did not have teeth, and did not have grasping claws/feet. In fact, the name Pteranodon means "wing without tooth", to set them apart from Pterodactyls.
Apparently, like many other things, the makers of the film went back and claimed it was a unique species in the movies, engineered by Ingen, so lord knows if they followed the same rules of flight as their real-world counterparts.
But hey, I don't mind admitting my info back when I made the original comment was outdated, and based on the old way scientists viewed their flight abilities. (Not sure if I should change the original post though, I always thought that would be kind of weird, so I'm just noting it here I guess.)
My favourite part is how "don't touch anything" Paleontologist Sarah Harding pets a baby dinosaur then shoves a camera in said dino's face, thereby inciting the parents to attack then later basks in the blood of an infant T-Rex to mend its leg with a plaster cast (and gum) without any resistance to the idea whatsoever just so we can get a dino attacks later on at the camp site.
YES! It's so baffling! "We're only here to observe". Bullshit.
P.S. Still love this movie 4evs
"That's fucking team work!!!" Holy shit that caught me off guard lol.
It was a sequel thats whats wrong with this movie.
TheElijahTalk NOPE THIS MOVIE WAS GREAT IT HAS VINCE VAUGHN
boss man so did Psycho... So did Psycho.
Wilhelm Sceam OOO GOT HIM
TheElijahTalk Up until the end, with the dino in the city, this was the book Michael Crichton wrote. That is why I loved it. Then they went to the city . . . and I died a little inside.
Tomnickles Yes good sir, my exact thoughts.
13:10 should have added the "Goofy Holler" when the raptor got kicked out the window.
The Syncshadow You've seen the nostalgia critic review
TenguBE hell yeah XD i still can't stop laughing..
The Syncshadow Or played the chorus from "Wrecking Ball".
Thanks!
How exactly is Ian Malcolm being good at CinemaSins... a sin?
Euan Millar Because...reasons!
Hunter Parker *ding*
Euan Millar Job theft maybe?
Euan Millar Because John Hammond said "I'm not making the same mistakes again" but Ian realized the "sin" in his plan.
Euan Millar Just because a character realizes and points out a sin, doesn't mean it's not still a sin.
Jeff Goldbum is still daddy regardless.
Well, you must feel lucky to be his daughter.
For those that didn't know how all the crew members on the ship actually died,
it was a pack of velocirapters that invaded the ship as it was leaving and killed everyone and as the ship crashed into the harbour in the corner of the screen you was meant to see a few velocirapters jump of the ship, the scenes was cut out the movie as they feard it would create confusion as to what happend to the raptors after they jumped off. which created even more confusion because now it looks like the Rex did escape killed everyone with no damage to the ship and lock its self in the container hold again.
in short they cut bits out of the movie and didn't explain properly as to what happend to the crew.
That's a Spielberg movie for ya!
Maybe those velociraptors got captured and were trained eventually by Chris Pratt and the lost world raptors are the same as the Jurassic world Dino's ehh maybe
Ya but it was a deleted scene, they should've definitely left it in because I've seen three TH-cam channels talk about that
@@maxhydekyle2425 I know this is way past late but it is just a theory and that concept art with the raptor and the guy with the flashlight could have been for a different seen cause when Sarah Dr Malcom and hs daughter were being attacked by raptors the other guy (completely forgot his name) was supposed to be with them and at the time he had a flashlight also-ran we never see the other side of wheel house it could have been torn off by the t Rex something to support that is that the hand that was left was his or her right hand the side they entered the room on
Lol but then their movie would still be wrong as the ship sails by itself
To the correct place still
There's a scene when Ian puts his binoculars to his eyes the wrong way. You missed a sin
I think screenwriter David Koepp wanted that scene in which he's eaten by the T-Rex, because he was against the San Diego finale. Therefore, it's a pretty cool joke.
Pete Postelthwaite's character was the best part of this movie: it's a shame he didn't live to reprise the role in either of the other installments.
Who did Pete play as?
Jeremy Kegley he was the guy who wanted to hunt the male t-rex~👌
Devin Mcclanahan Is it wrong of me to believe that was Patrick Stewart XD
Ms. Marble Pie 'The Samurai' Wait that wasn't Patrick Stewart? My life is a lie!!
I think his character was killed by the T-Rex. His fate is never revealed either way, but I'm convinced Roland was killed. I could be wrong, though.
12:56 I don't know why that "mmm mmm good" gets me so bad everytime. But I legit cannot stop replaying it and laughing
Ian Malcom, mathematician, obvious choice to lead a dino expedition ;)
Once you know what a projection of a path in the tangential bundle onto the underlying manifold is, you are ready to do anything. ;)
Seems like John was just looking for a way to get rid of him at this point
In the book, Malcolm's daughter is white and brings a black boy with her to the island, I guess they decided to combine the characters...
Tool0GT92 Malcolm has no daughter in the book, the white girl and black boy are helping another scientist guy that goes to the island and gets lost, Malcolm happanes to know him and decide to go look for him, AND he and the kids know the guy that was making the treailers, AND that guy getting lost is actually the reason why they went to the island and how the kids got mixed in the plot. That was long -_-
I really wish they followed the book more...
Halit Erez I agree. The book was fantastic.
Halit Erez since your memory is better than mine, didn't Malcolm die at the end of Jurassic Park but was somehow alive in The Lost World?
Tool0GT92 Yeah, pretty much. I'm 99% sure Ian Malcom pulled a Princess Bride and said that he was "mostly dead" or some shit like that. I'm not paraphrasing, I think he actually uses that phrase.
Still a good read, though. I remember enjoying it more than the original book, but that's just me.
Tool0GT92 ryrysteam It is never said in the first book that he died. They have vague hints that he might have died, but nothing is officially announced.
At the begining of the second book we learn that Malcolm spent almost a year in a hospital in Costa Rica and had multiple surgeries, *almost died*, and was left crippled. All the others involved were kept in the dark and went on with their lives, not knowing he was actually alive until he could finally go back home.
He never tries to break the confidentiality contract. He never told anyone about what happened or about the dinos, in fact he denies all rumors about the incident, because InGen was paying all his medical bills for two years of treatments that he needed after what happened...
at 5:13, the wire around the pachy's neck didn't come from the gun, the guy sitting in the chair on the side of the vehicle put it around the pachy's neck using a long pole. The gun simply fired a tranq dart to make capture of the pachy easier. -1 sin for Lost World and +1 sin for CinemaSins
Ya they just add signs to scenes taken out of context
That gymnastics raptor kick should have been at least a 10 sins in of itself. Jesus that's stupid.
“We are here to observe and document, not interact.” Yeah Sarah after you just literally petted a baby dino
another sin, 10 seconds after the guy gets eaten, Malcolm shows up. Did that trex forget there were more ppl in there? and how did Malcolm manage to get inside the waterfall without the rex seeing him?
Maybe it was taking the body back to it's nest to feed the infant; if Malcolm saw it wandering off then he could've easily slipped into the waterfall.
Or it probably didn't care. It fed and was probably content and left. Dinosaurs aren't just mindless killing monsters you know.
@@taoliu3949 Except for the indominous rex. 😂😂😂
@@crazyowlgirlcncowner or the indoraptor
Like dogs, lots of dinosaurs are *Color Blind* and have a very *Bad Memory* . Think about it. Go up to you cat slash dog, and put on something there not used to. Like glasses. And they freak out when you touch them.
6:48
I was freakin' 6 when this movie came out, and even THEN, I knew what two grown-ass adults were doing was stupid/suicidal as hell. Dr. Harding is supposed to be an animal behaviorist who studies African predators, and Nick Van Owen is supposed to be an experienced documentarian, having covered wars in Rwanda and Bosnia.
Both of these people should bloody well know better than to take an injured T-Rex youngling into their compound, Harding because of her background in animal -freaking-behavior and Owen because, let's be honest here, even if he hadn't had any experience dealing with rescue missions to retrieve POW's and helping injured soldiers off of the battlefield (even just freaking filming it is better than nothing), at the very least, his adult brain should take a look at the situation in front of them, remember that a Tyrannosaurs is 13 feet tall, 40 feet long, 7.5 tons, and his mind and body should collectively shit itself at the idea of taking said youngling into their FUCKING TRAILER.
So thank you, CinemaSins. You've taken an argument that I've had since I was an elementary school kid and made it stand out in glorious 480p. Because HD makes my computer complain.
For all the faults in the movie, the suspense of the trailer scene always stayed with me. That might actually be my very favourite scene of the JP series.
and also the worst in the whole series because it does not make ANY sense
The real sin is that the heisenberg uncertainty principle has nothing to do with the observer effect or paleontology.
It does if you have dinosaurs the size of protons.
@@thesprawl2361 best comment ever LOL
@@thesprawl2361 I assume they were that size at one point…?
@@borismuller86 Erm...no.
I think the only reason they put that very unnecessary scene with the little girl getting attacked into this movie was because it was a crucial starting point for the plot in the first book. Thinking about it, Jurassic Park two and three consist of about 70% of ideas from the first book which weren't used in the first one.
For example the waterfall scene, the whole driving around on a boat in the third one, the Pteranodon attack of the third one and many more.
do everything wrong with JUMPER please
themrmystery47 They could just show the movie
That movie was a sin in itself
Yeah Jumper pls
themrmystery47 No lie i liked that movie. Wasnt bad to me.
I think they are going to do jumper 2
What happened to Ian's other two kids? Remember people, in a jeep scene in the first movie when he was asked about having kids, he replied three, one is here, where are the others?
Probably with their moms remember he said something about always onthe look out for an ex mrs malcom? In the first movie(:
Compys have a venomous bite that impairs its victims. This is shown in-movie by first have Dieter fight off his attackers and chase after them with no problem. Later he is shown stumbling until he finally falls and starts drinking from the stream to soothe his swelling and aching throat(more evidence later in the scene) before looking confused when the first compy jumps on his back. As Dieter begins to climb over the log not only is he panting but he is also wheezing noticeably(aforementioned swollen and sore throat).
There is a convenient branch that catches Dieter's gun when he falls and despite you showing that scene it doesn't get sinned. For both that and your inattentiveness to the Compy situation I give CinemaSins +2 Sins.
No where do they mention that in this series. Also how would you know they have venom?! They're extinct.
@@elykspuz6596 They said it in the jp book
@@daanwindt1633 The books do not matter.
Jazaray the books do matter. A much more appropriate statement would be that just because it’s in the books is not an excuse to not mention it in the movies.
@@NCC1371 In relation to the Cinema Sins channel, the books do not matter. They do not mention it in the movie, therefore that didn't exist in the movie's universe.
What about the fact that the first established that the T-Rex vision was mainly focused on movement. So when Dr. Grant and what's her name sat still, the T-Rex couldn't see them.
Yet now, the second movie establishes that the T-Rex can see perfectly and even spot the guy in the truck and that he is food, they can also smell perfectly, making you unable to hide from them.
Or that when the T-Rex's had already eaten the guy from the truck, so they wouldn't come immediately back to feed again. Some time would pass. But in San Diego, all it does is go around to search out food.
The T-Rex vision was never established in the first book, it was theorised by Grant and then completely repudiated in the second book by Malcolm. The T-Rex can see fine, Grant was just lucky in the first book because the T-Rex had just fed and wasn't interested in eating Grant, which is why it left.
In San Diego, the T-Rex was in a completely new world that it was not familiar in, you can make the argument that it 'freaked out' like anyone would if they were drugged and woke up somewhere completely alien to them.
"The T-Rex can see fine, Grant was just lucky in the first book because the T-Rex had just fed and wasn't interested in eating Grant, which is why it left." Had just fed on what?
While the movie could have done a better job explaining this, in the Lost World book they actually lampshade the whole "Its sight is based on movement thing" (which had been archaeologically refuted between the making of the first book and the second book), and then they actually make a character's death in the Lost World (book) due to him thinking he would be invisible to the T-Rex by standing still.
@@nathenhutchison6182 The lawyer who had abandoned the kids, to hide in the toilet.
@@taoliu3949 Plus it had been drugged, it searched for water(the pool), then Sarah said it would search for food. They had basically overdosed the rex, so it was in overdrive. Only thing that distracted it, was the baby.
I’m surprised that around the 10 minute mark he didn’t mention how they feel the need to WALK to the facility and totally ignore the fact that the InGen people came to the island with an entire fleet of fast, all terrain/off road vehicles from motorbikes to hummers
They probably got trashed by the dinosaurs’ escape
@@ctaco5112 I was thinking the same thing, they mustve got destroyed then... but come on, not one vehicle made it through?? LOL
Anyone else annoyed by the fact that Velociraptors depicted in this movie aren't actually Velociraptors, but instead bare a closer resemblance to Utahraptors, yet no one decides to address this?
I didn't know that.
+Kid_Scion velociraptors had feathers on their arms but not a lot so they were flightless, I think they also had feathers on their face and tails. I can't remember the other traits :/ you can google "accurate velociraptor" if you're curious :D
Nightcore Char No you're right, they did have feathers. In JP3 they kinda acknowledged this by having the little things on the top of their heads. I've always assumed they were feathers anyways.
+Frisbee These aren't accurate dinos, they keep reminding us that these are mutants, since they used other reptile DNA to complete their genome sequence and actually create them. So of course many dinos don't look accurate, chances are none could ever recreate a Dino 100%. All JP dinos are mutants
+Nightcore Char Velociraptors are actually about a meter tall (the specifics escape me and my laziness to not look up the exact height). The raptors in JP are called "Velociraptor" purely because it sounds cooler than "Utahraptor". I think they side step this in Jurassic World by not actually naming the kind of raptor.
When I watched this movie as a kid, the opening scene kinda traumatised me. I'm genuinely happy about that throwaway line about her being fine.
I feel like Nick Van Owen caused the most havoc in this movie.
He's personally responsible for every single death in this movie.
He's the one who let all those dinosaurs loose which caused them to destroy that group to lose their radio and other equipment that could have gotten them out of there.
He's the one who went after the baby t-rex, freed it and brought it back to their trailer, causing the parents to show up and destroy it as well as kill their totally innocent dude who tried to save them.
Because Nick got that other group's shit destroyed they had to trek all the way to that facility which meant that they had to have that run in with the Compsignathus, the T-rexes and the raptors.
He took out that guy's bullets preventing him from killing that T-rex who squished one guy and ate another.
All those guys who went through that place with the raptors, again had to cause all their equipment was destroyed by Nick.
And then they had to tranq the T-rex and bring it over to San Francisco instead of killing it like it was planned and that T-rex ate at least 2 people (the baby ate one) and caused who knows how ever many deaths from people panicing as well as all the damages.
And he's one of the heroes remember?
Koepp says that when writing the movie he was partially inspired by his favourite song, "Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner" by Warren Zevon. The song is about a mercenary named Roland who is betrayed by man named Van Owen.
He does. His actions while well intentioned led to unfoseen events. "That's uh tha'ts chaos theory". They tried to call back in the 3rd film, but fumbled badly
i think if allen grant was in this film he would of had a real nervous breakdown lol
Dead. That part with EVERYONE!!! had me rolling around. So funny.
LOL
Claude Thompson me too
Claude Thompson Moose!!!
Claude Thompson I really need to find out where that scene is from.
HOLY SHIT! Vince Vaughn was in this movie?!
Mario Habijanec ye, he was in the first movie as well..
Yeah he was Mexican
NCE MajorDerp where was he in the first movie?
ERAUPRCWA He was not in the first movie.
yeah before he got fat...Bahahahaha
1:19
Explained in the novel.
Everything was just for tourists, the eggs had basically 99.9% failiure rate meaning you need a factory.
Seems like a big risk, having eggs that would almost certainly fail set up to hatch for tourists, surely? Or do you mean fertilisation usually failed?
@@borismuller86 Both failed fertilization (nothing happens) and mortality rates (unknown animals, faults in the gene structure etc)
Everything Wrong With Sherlock Holmes and Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows.
Even though those movies are amazing. :D
That's perfect Yes do Sherlock Holmes. And as popular and money grossing as it was I'm surprised he hasn't yet
CheesyGranola these movies def in my top 10 of all time. i think its a great idea to sin them!
*****
He finished Deathly Hollows a while back, actually.
***** Just look at the "videos" tab of the channel, they are between Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome and Poltergeist.
***** There's a *'Search'* function you can use y'know?
One to search TH-cam in general and one to search individual channel lists.
It's sad because most of the sins could easily be fixable
A lot of these sins are stupid and don't exist
That´s kinda the joke. Although most sins dont make sens and are easily explainable, its somehow fun to watch a dude that complains about everything haha
Franco Parnetti Ha, yes, this is accurate. I agree with this statement. You have a good point, good sir. I mean, even THEY don't really dislike most of the movies they sin. They've done a lot of movies they personally love, and/or that they acknowledge as beautifully done overall, like Wall-E, but most of their videos are of decent films like this one where it's not the best movie in the world but it doesn't suck too hard either. You know that a movie really does suck when you can hear the narrator actually getting mad. And somehow those are the most entertaining ones. Like the DBZ Evolution one? First sin, right out of the gate: "I can already tell I'm gonna hate this movie" LOL
exactly!!! lol agreeing with pandawee
A nitpick that actually reaches all the way back to the books: Velociraptor is only about the size of a chicken and probably more like the Compsognathus (i.e. the little green guys that ate that one bad guy), what they actually should be is Utahraptors which fit the size and is from the same family, but I guess Velociraptor sounded cooler :)
3:42 "Dinosaur Island? What do they got there?" "Apes, but they're not so big"