2024 Honda City Hatchback 1.5L V-Sensing VS RS e:HEV in Malaysia, Worth The “Upgrade”? | WapCar
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
- The 2024 Honda City Hatchback 1.5L V-Sensing is a supremely brilliant choice for an everyday car with its practicality, fuel efficiency and even driving dynamics. However, what if there’s an even more efficient choice?
Only caveat is that it comes with a much higher price tag to start with but over the long run, does the City Hatchback RS e:HEV actually save you more money?
Join Adrian as he crunches some numbers to find out whether you can indeed save more money by spending more money.
_____________________________________________
Quick Specs:
2024 Honda City Hatchback RS e:HEV
Electric Motor Power: 109 PS
Electric Motor Torque: 253 Nm
Transmission: Single-ratio automatic transmission
Price: RM109,900
Read More: www.wapcar.my/cars/honda/city...
_____________________________________________
Intro: 00:00
Fuel Consumption & Related Cost: 00:46
Periodic Maintenance Cost: 01:08
Insurance & Secondhand Value: 01:30
RM14k Buys You What Exactly: 02:48
Driving Impressions: 04:06
Final Thoughts & Conclusion: 06:03
____________ Follow Us ____________
Website www.wapcar.my/
Facebook: / wapcar.my
Instagram: / wapcar.my
Shot & Edited by: Dylan ( / dylanpdl )
Hosted by: Adrian ( / adriannnchia ) - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
I drive a City Hatchback RS eHEV and I think its better power and refinement can justify its higher price tag. Not to mention some extra features like the electronic parking brake with auto brake hold.
at the end of the day both variants are very good but just the rs ehev is a much better value and equipment 👌😄
What about the sedan price
I believe the editor wrongly put the petrol price differences for both variant.
Unfortunately Honda jacked up the price for the 2024 facelift models. Hence, the price is higher than the previous year.
when la honda malaysia will facelift this one. its been almost 6 months since the sedan version was facelifted
Why no silver colour for the rs variant 😞
Neck-to-neck really. Is all depending on how much U drive weekly/ monthly. No harm to get the hybrid but beyond the warranty gotta keep an eye on battery and inverter (both would cost a bomb)
Certainly. If you are not a frequent user, I believe the V-Spec is a more cost-effective option.
you forgot to include interest rate for those 14000, which would be about 500. So you actually need longer time to recoup the value.
not having spare tyre really a dumb move, just had blown out tyre, not punctured tyre and luckily there was spare tyre in my old vios car.
besides, having torque figure of 250 ++ but can only managed to outpace 1.5 na only by a second in 0-100kmh race is just not worth it.
Yes agreed. The Hybrid is a better drive overall 👍
No spare tyre is a deal breaker for me
Hopefully, they didn't raise the price for the facelift release.
eHEV is way better but i do not like the gearbox that handles it
Thank goodness no more review about overhype Mazda cars. But that 7.3l/100km is a bit over. On average is like 5.6l/100km more or less.
After 10 years and 200k km the hybrid battery probably needs to be replaced, making the value near 0 (or scrap) for the hybrid car, whereas there will still be sensible retail value for the non-hybrid petrol variant; so all the minor fuel saving and maintenance differences for the hybrid are for nothing; and what about an earlier failure of the hybrid system after warranty runs out before the 10 years of age of the car? (There are many hybrid electric components that can fail)
buy a hybrid only if you drive alot and to fight high fuel prices, 200K 300K KM after 10 years dump it away cheaply and be done with it
If you drive 250,000 km with it and you compare it with 1 lt every 15km (no hybrid) with 1 lt every 20km (hybrid), with a petrol price of 2.05, you would spend around 8,500 ringgit less with the hybrid. If the fuel economy of the hybrid would be 1 lt every 25km and the price of petrol goes up by 50% (roughly the price of unsubsidized fuel probably) the difference becomes around 21,000 ringgit; and the non-hybrid car probably fetches 7.5k more at least compared to the battery depleted hybrid car… it makes no financial sense
@@jrkoster I can't do these calculations but owning a car the running cost is the thing and in the end resale value another matter. Tbh if really need a car buy what works for you now, be it petrol, hybrid or even ev. All of them in the end gonna cost us money some more some lesser.
Near zero value? Please fact check before you speak. Regardless of the value preposition, older Honda hybrids (previous gen Insight, Jazz hybrid, CRZ) are still kicking and battery replacement is available aftermarket around RM5000.
Fact check first la before commenting😂 the hybrid battery cost is 6k new from honda. U can get cheaper at halfcut. Its not an ev to be scrap because of the battery cost😂
City HB V-sensing specs & above or Yaris G specs???
ada pro ada cons la bang.. ssh nk ckp.. dua2 ada kelebihan kekurangan.. sbb aku pnh pkai city hb vsens sebelum ni.. skrg yaris g.
@@bathory1978 blh share comparison antara kedua² ni based on pengalaman tuan?
@@asyrafdanish3000 kalau dr segi rupa aku lg minat city hb.. dr segi keselesaan yaris lg selesa.. lg senyap.. jln tak rata lg selesa.. drive 140-150 still boleh dgr clear lg bila psg lagu.. city bila speed 120 xdgr apa dh.. city minyak lg jimat drive relax2 bole cecah 700km fulltank.. yaris 500km++ je.. kalau nk koner laju2 tajam city best lg.. yaris mcm turning radius dia luas sikit xbrp best.. byk lg.. masing2 ada kelebihan kekurangan..