Just to echo/emphasize a great point that Pete made in the video: if you find yourself saying "I'd rather have X to bluff," this is a mistake the same way it would be to say "I'd rather have the nuts to valuebet." Of course we'd all rather have a higher EV hand at all times. The key question is: which makes more money between 1) surrendering/taking your shred of equity and 2) trying to generate fold equity
This one was on another level compared to other videos of yours I've seen. Very much appreciated this kind of in-depth analysis, and the phone-calls bit was great 😂
10/10 content, even though I don't play cash, only tournaments :) I'm probably more aggressive than these nodes, but my opponents force me to not be, as I get called way easier than what the solver does. I'm struggling. You are talking about people having to call Aj and 33. I bet noone consider to fold those hands against me, they don't believe me for having a king.. I'm getting called 3 times by ace high , so I try to value bet with any pair on those boards.. hoping to get value. Anyway, people can just do whatever they want. i'm gonna try to mirror the solver as much as possible and try to understand important principles
Quality video ty Pete! Tbh though I prefer the videos with straight hand review no solver, then I pause the video and look at a solver myself whenever its a spot I don't know or I'm curious about
Yeah. The second hand is so easy to auto pilot and check with a marginal hand that in fact is junk . With 67s I am always bluffing turn because that one is clearer it has no show down value. Thanks for the nice video again!!
the reason we want to OB pocket 6 with a club is very very simple. our main high ev come from strong value hand getting call . we dont mind opponent folding if opponent call and we hit the river 6 is the best card for us. if we dont have the club 6 and river drop club 6 are we happy to get our stack in ? our ev clearly not as high compare to a clean 6
RE: 66 hand: If we bluff more often than the solver recommends then by definition we are bluffing more often than is balanced. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but in this case you pointed out that recs are over-defending this board. Do we really want to over-bluff on nodes where we suspect that villain over-defends?
If there is ever a spot where blockers matter more than usual it is when having a K basically halves the number of value combos your opponent has - it isn't like having 99 with a heart blocks 3 flush combos out of 47 or something.
Spot 1: Interesting that JJ-TT-99 are pure fold on the turn for villain but not x8s. Because he unblocks 88? And x8s have 5 outs instead of 2 against TP ?
Just to echo/emphasize a great point that Pete made in the video: if you find yourself saying "I'd rather have X to bluff," this is a mistake the same way it would be to say "I'd rather have the nuts to valuebet." Of course we'd all rather have a higher EV hand at all times. The key question is: which makes more money between 1) surrendering/taking your shred of equity and 2) trying to generate fold equity
Id rather have a Lambo but I have my old Honda
@@1312Mork2I would take the Honda any day.
If my income remained equal.
16:55 the happiest ive seen pete
This one was on another level compared to other videos of yours I've seen. Very much appreciated this kind of in-depth analysis, and the phone-calls bit was great 😂
thank you for showing the results i wouldnt have been able to make it through the video
10/10 content, even though I don't play cash, only tournaments :) I'm probably more aggressive than these nodes, but my opponents force me to not be, as I get called way easier than what the solver does. I'm struggling. You are talking about people having to call Aj and 33. I bet noone consider to fold those hands against me, they don't believe me for having a king.. I'm getting called 3 times by ace high , so I try to value bet with any pair on those boards.. hoping to get value.
Anyway, people can just do whatever they want. i'm gonna try to mirror the solver as much as possible and try to understand important principles
I love the phone interrupts by Pete's boss 😂😂 I rewatched those parts 10 times! I loved it so much!!
Love the format. I'd always like to know the base (GTO solution) and from there I'd like to know the deviations we make and why.
Quality video ty Pete! Tbh though I prefer the videos with straight hand review no solver, then I pause the video and look at a solver myself whenever its a spot I don't know or I'm curious about
love the format and i love this way up - at table analysis then solver
13:00 It's block 56s folds.
Yeah. The second hand is so easy to auto pilot and check with a marginal hand that in fact is junk . With 67s I am always bluffing turn because that one is clearer it has no show down value. Thanks for the nice video again!!
the reason we want to OB pocket 6 with a club is very very simple. our main high ev come from strong value hand getting call . we dont mind opponent folding if opponent call and we hit the river 6 is the best card for us. if we dont have the club 6 and river drop club 6 are we happy to get our stack in ? our ev clearly not as high compare to a clean 6
this vid has been a treasure trove of information. i will be a bluff master soon
Pete, when’s the razz course coming? I quit my job to play razz professionally so sooner is better
RE: 66 hand: If we bluff more often than the solver recommends then by definition we are bluffing more often than is balanced. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but in this case you pointed out that recs are over-defending this board. Do we really want to over-bluff on nodes where we suspect that villain over-defends?
Was gonna ask this too
They over defend flop, and overfold turn, because they overdefended flop. Check MDA data 🤫
great format, keep going
If there is ever a spot where blockers matter more than usual it is when having a K basically halves the number of value combos your opponent has - it isn't like having 99 with a heart blocks 3 flush combos out of 47 or something.
Spot 1: Interesting that JJ-TT-99 are pure fold on the turn for villain but not x8s. Because he unblocks 88? And x8s have 5 outs instead of 2 against TP ?
Excellent work Mr Carrotz
Can you explain why we have 'the nut advantage'?
hand review + solver = 👍
So....what was the result of the last hand? I don't want your producer to fire you...
The annoying phone lady was pure gold
BOOOOM (love your content Carrotman) 😊
And now that I watched the video I love it even more
66s without a club are a bad bluff because they block 65s which is the folding range of an OOP player.
Fishes want you to show the result to prove you're wrong, because they are result oriented 😂😂😂😂
Begrudgingly, "Ugh, I kinda have to call this" - Major leak
who's the lady on the phone? hahaha :D