High Stakes LEGEND BenaBadBeat Reviews 50NL HANDS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 เม.ย. 2024
  • Check out Ben's channel here: 👉 / @benabadbeatpoker
    🚀 Our Subscription Video Service is LIVE 👉 carrotcorner.com/
    🎓 Pick up The Carrot Poker School Full Scholarship and get three months subscription FREE: 👉 www.carrotcorner.com/school/
    📜 Video Description 📜
    Could this be the next Game of Gold? In this special one off poker gameshow, high stakes legend poker pro BenaBadBeat comes onto the channel to critique the game of one of our discord members who plays a stake similar to 50NL cash game poker. Ben's job simple, he must decide in this bunch of losing hands whether the poker student played badly or just ran bad and lost money due to variance.
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 52

  • @BenaBadBeatPoker
    @BenaBadBeatPoker หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    thanks for having me on pete! hyped to do this again in the future, but wtf did your editor do to my teeth in the animation :D

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We are glad to have a distinguished guest on Carrot Corner.

    • @kezman82a
      @kezman82a หลายเดือนก่อน

      19:08 what have you heard about that site? Im playing there so Im curious :)

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kezman82a games be good

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kezman82a haha yep that games are good and splashy

  • @yoniker83
    @yoniker83 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Pete, we would like an update on the NL100 challenge and current results. You didn't talk about that for a while, which is concerning.

    • @scottkay483
      @scottkay483 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      rake ate him alive it seems, does not deserve to play the game

  • @maxwelllittle5291
    @maxwelllittle5291 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    One thing people don't realize is how likely it is to see breakeven or losing stretches when you have a really big sample. If you only have a 5% chance of a losing 100k sample, but you play 2M hands, you are likely to have at least one stretch of 100k worth of losing hands.

  • @angrybeaver2204
    @angrybeaver2204 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    GOATed collab, more please!

  • @Lucas-fh5dl
    @Lucas-fh5dl หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Pete we talked about including the results in these videos

  • @1312Mork2
    @1312Mork2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I just found Bens channel yesterday and was so impressed. This is gonna be a banger episode

  • @SteveVgod
    @SteveVgod หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Need to update that link to bens channel in the description

    • @seslocrit9365
      @seslocrit9365 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just look up benabadbeat. It's not that hard.

    • @warrenbluffit2048
      @warrenbluffit2048 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seslocrit9365 these days people need all the help they can get

  • @ProWagerHub
    @ProWagerHub หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    While variance is a BEAST I truly think you’re underestimating how much your content can boost someone’s red line. Especially in a pool that overfolds so consistently and under-protects their checking range so frequently. I believe it’s not coincidence my redline evened out after digesting hours of carrot corner and taking notes

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      One of the best feelings of anyone’s poker career is to see that red line go from a couple of Ks in bbs south to slowly evening out, and then finally make a complete U-turn to +ks in bbs north!
      Gl and keep studying!

  • @videootje86
    @videootje86 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Such a treat to see these beasts reviewing hands together, and having fun as well.

  • @MikeD-rr2bj
    @MikeD-rr2bj หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. Hilarious censorship moment and outro. Enjoyed the guest and his approach to analysis. Great from both guys as usual. Was a brisk, dense conversation. I had to rewind at times. One of the best hand analysis I've seen in a while, imo.

  • @gsomethingsomething2658
    @gsomethingsomething2658 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Pete, your intriguing haircut: a bad beat or a bad play?
    PS. Fantastic content as always. Thanks!

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think we should have a poll to see what kind of haircut he gets next.
      I am in the Lloyd Christmas camp, but others may come up with something better.

    • @gsomethingsomething2658
      @gsomethingsomething2658 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jeffshackleford3152 A Lloyd Christmas cut gets my vote, too. 🤣

  • @mariocardoso291
    @mariocardoso291 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Playing against most micro stakes players you should fold the river with AQ of hearts IMO

  • @Michaelperry1985
    @Michaelperry1985 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent work gentlemen! Love the reviews

  • @shibasama4000
    @shibasama4000 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Really great episode 👍

  • @mathgrrrrl
    @mathgrrrrl หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🔥🔥🔥 Amazing video!

  • @imbapingu9162
    @imbapingu9162 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what a bangin outro LOL

  • @ekw555
    @ekw555 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @5:49 - did the editor spell ANGRY wrong just to make me ANGY?
    or was he mocking Pete?

  • @sinsmiletv2840
    @sinsmiletv2840 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ben IS AMAZING!

  • @tobibatt4731
    @tobibatt4731 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For the first hand I think that low stakes players way overfold to flop check raises so on the river the villian has on average a too strong hand range and is thus under folding and this is another reason why over bluffing is a bad move here.
    Would this be a good or bad reasoning to check back 69hh?

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      we actually kinda what them to have an average to strong hand (which they always will do given action), but if we expect to see some more aggression from the average 50nl reg on flop or turn, then we naturally will see more folds otr i think!

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, definitely true and that’s a great reasoning to have more give ups than GTO. Based on my own database, they certainly under fold OTR once they call flop and turn. They basically fold everything OTT, so by the river they will land with hands that they already decided will call down.

  • @overEW
    @overEW หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man I think those top pair call downs for the full stack in those stakes are veeeeryyyy villain dependant. I've been playing that and a loot of villains just have it everyyy freaking time so I actually think some of those calls are possibly not great

  • @O.M.Comedy
    @O.M.Comedy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    19:07 please can someone tell me what site are they talking about?

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's a swedish site called Svenskaspel. pretty sure only swedes can play there though!

    • @peterjarvis8704
      @peterjarvis8704 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably Svenska Spel Poker. Swedish state run site. I play sometimes there at 50NL where they do have 5 handed tables and you play deep.

  • @MikeD-rr2bj
    @MikeD-rr2bj หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it a coincidence that the equity villain needs to have to call a bet is the same as the fold equity you need to make a bluff?
    I think the internet is full of people who can't answer this question and I'm spending a lot of time trying to figure it out for myself.

  • @whereismymind1
    @whereismymind1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it probably is at this channel somewhere, but can you maybe sometimes make a video about this variance meta delusions please? because thats exactly what happend to me on reg tables nl25. 20k hands and i felt like a god. one thing is facts from pros, other is the feeling of some actual money being won in a country where its much more than for some english or swedish grinder. if that makes sense. on live nl200 thats even bigger perception.

  • @losyart
    @losyart หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can only say that AQh hand vs micro pool on Stars you losing on river like 90 % of time or even more . And you will be lucky to chop it sometimes . But that is only my feelings. My estimations might be wrong

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I imagine that to be true at micros.
      People just don't like to fire rivers, especially regs.
      I have more respect for a lot of the fish at micros, because even though they might be picking the wrong spots to do it, at least they are trying.
      Most of the nit regs are not even interested in putting money in with less than TPTK, much less TPGK.

    • @vincevegas222
      @vincevegas222 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I totally agree. River bluff shoves are at the micro's pretty rare already. with this action sequence and board texture i would even say that against non-maniac players you see hands 99% of the time that are better than top pair top kicker. btw i wouldn't fold either

    • @jeffshackleford3152
      @jeffshackleford3152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@vincevegas222 I guess I am in the maniac camp according to you.
      The way I figure is if it is hard for me to have bluffs on a board, I should probably bluff it.

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker หลายเดือนก่อน

      could definitely be true! but also i think our time as poker players can be better/more efficiently directed to hands that yield greater and more frequent EV

  • @kevdawg55
    @kevdawg55 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, a question about variance. If even 100-200k hands is nothing in poker then is it possible some famous live player, say Daniel Negreanu for example, just ran really well for a decade and actually suck? You know what I mean?

    • @johngriller4997
      @johngriller4997 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh absolutely. Negreanu was a known fish for the majority of his career until Doug Polk beat him HU. That’s when he actually took it seriously and started studying solvers, and now he’s an actual decent poker player.

  • @Jacobson-dp7gg
    @Jacobson-dp7gg หลายเดือนก่อน

    23:50 you revealed you lost at -4bb/100 in a freudian slip

  • @criostasi4080
    @criostasi4080 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Playing only 2/5 and 5/10 live cash game 200bb+ deep (occasionally higher ) I have a couple of questions about arguments you touched in the video.
    1) I think when you play deep stack huge pot make the big difference in the results a lot more than in online 100bb deep games. Don't you agree?
    2)!About variance in these live games, how many hands make a "big" sample? Because you don't play 300k hands in one life of live poker, but I don't know a single winning player losing after a 6 moths period (15k hands)...

    • @BenaBadBeatPoker
      @BenaBadBeatPoker หลายเดือนก่อน

      1) good question. it's likely that over small samples and in splashy games, the big pots have a far greater impact on your winrate. but that's also because in live, the game will generally be a lot weaker (people won't be attacking small pots as much as online). that doesn't mean you can't also add extreme hourly by getting better at playing small pots, increasing your edge on pool
      2) this is totally dependent on your win rate, and sadly we just can't ever know what your true winrate is live. there are going to be so many players that run good their entire careers and others that quit because of their distribution. i guess all i'd say is you wanna be studying as much as possible and also pray to the gods you are in the top percentile :D

  • @jnapp1215
    @jnapp1215 หลายเดือนก่อน

    review ... review ... review.... oh another review ....

  • @scousesniper9265
    @scousesniper9265 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Q9c. Spewy. Easy fold pre