David Shatz - What is an Afterlife?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ค. 2024
  • Check us out on Instagram for announcements, giveaways, and more: shorturl.at/rwC16
    What does it mean to have an ‘afterlife’? Are there different kinds of afterlives? What would it feel like to be in an afterlife? If one samples the various afterlives on offer from the world’s multitudinous religions, one would be forgiven for being confused. Here’s the core question: If there is a an afterlife, do individual personalities persist?
    Get subscriber-only benefits with a free Closer To Truth account today: shorturl.at/ajRZ8
    Watch more videos on life after death: shorturl.at/qTdiv
    David Shatz is the Ronald P. Stanton University Professor of Philosophy, Ethics, and Religious Thought at Yeshiva University and editor of The Torah u-Madda Journal, a journal devoted to the interaction between Judaism and general culture.
    Subscribe to the Closer To Truth podcast for new episodes every Wednesday: shorturl.at/hwGP3
    Closer To Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

ความคิดเห็น • 145

  • @chrisdistant9040
    @chrisdistant9040 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I kind of hate the idea of selling people on something that they will never live to verify/falsify.
    Kind of scummy, actually.

  • @jmanj3917
    @jmanj3917 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I like the line at the very end, the one about preferring action over receiving an award.
    Go Bluejays!"
    🙂

  • @Jaggerbush
    @Jaggerbush หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like this idea

  • @ChildofGod98765
    @ChildofGod98765 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    There are so many different obstacles that I face as a single mom. Some days I want to give up. God give me strength. I’m struggling to make ends meet. Both of my sons are special needs and require much from me. I keep faith because I know that God will provide. So as I struggle to buy groceries for my children, and as I struggle to pay rent every month. I turn to you Lord Jesus help me. Amen ❤️

    • @dukeallen432
      @dukeallen432 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WNt to believe in magic yo feel better have at it. Just don’t expect rational people cut your slack.

    • @jalalsalehofficial
      @jalalsalehofficial หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am sorry that you are struggling. However if you actually read the bible you would know to suffer is gods supposed will. If you attend a church ask someone for help. Constantly asking for help from god to no answer is your wake up call to do something different. Gods supposed will kills 1000s of children a day from cancer starvation natural disasters and other worse things. No amount of prayer can make change only you can

    • @gauravghosh6047
      @gauravghosh6047 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no GOD

    • @jasongilder22
      @jasongilder22 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don’t listen to these fools. Praying for you.

    • @gauravghosh6047
      @gauravghosh6047 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jasongilder22 praying to whom?? Who is listening. Universe is a quantam wave sheet. We don't need to have a God to create waves.

  • @12marcusboy
    @12marcusboy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If anyone is interested read a few books. One called silver birch speaks. Many books on topics. Also white eagle speaks. And seth material. Not religious dogma. It will open your eyes

  • @jalalsalehofficial
    @jalalsalehofficial หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This may be disappointing but there is no afterlife. I’ve suffered cardiac arrest and resuscitated after 5 minutes with no heart beat. There is nothing to experience just sleep without a dream. Don’t go your life begging for gods help to only credit him when another human helps you. Live your life and be good for those around you

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      I concur but still think that it is an unknown quantity and will always be that way, I think I can postulate but should not cement the issue, Survival now is most fundamental to biosouls or bioconcious life, I think the afterlife can have issues with survival now for some individuals who hold Religious opinions about the afterlife, or they chose life after death rather than life now and it could be an error on there behalf.

    • @WillyyKW
      @WillyyKW หลายเดือนก่อน

      The truth is that you did not die definitively. Heart failure is not death. Death seriously has no reversal.

    • @jalalsalehofficial
      @jalalsalehofficial หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WillyyKW tell that to the mass amounts of people who claim to see “the light” angels/demons, Etc. 🤣 without the heart the mind has a limited time to function. Without a heart beat you are technically dead. After extended periods of no blood circulating to your brain cells break down. It is still death but before the point where too much decay has taken place.
      If you drop a cup and it is now in pieces it is broken. If it shatters it is still broken but beyond repair.

  • @chayanbosu3293
    @chayanbosu3293 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    God Sri Krishna explained in Bhagbat Gita very well.

  • @francesco5581
    @francesco5581 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    an afterlife can be just consciousness in a "no-time" environment

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      No there is no reason to believe such a postulation as a conscious agent is built for this world which we live in not an imaginary postulation of survival into the unknown sphere of death. Proof is in the pudding and we have seen because of this postulate of survival into the afterlife individuals have gone against survival or destroyed themselves in the process to meet this afterlife with no real substance or evidence of it except someone's opinion which is deadly in this respect. Not very clever or smart I might add.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You would have to postulate or explain first a dinosaur consciousness in the afterlife or simply unknown sphere which we name afterlife and all other creatures that have existed in the past and into the future you would need to include all conscious entities historically and into the future. Mere speculation and postulation for other reasons.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The conscious agent is the will to survive. Schopenhauer was almost correct but lacked the foresight to complete his postulation but was close it was just a definition issue.

    • @francesco5581
      @francesco5581 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MasterofOne-zl6ur Do you fear to not have enough room for you ? i think the best possible explanation was given by Huston Smith, after death the drop does not return to the ocean but the drop is ready to accept the ocean inside, so whatever if we are talking of a worm consciousness or yours both will receive the ocean (the universal consciousness) after death.

    • @francesco5581
      @francesco5581 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MasterofOne-zl6ur we know for sure that the vast majority of consciences around would prefer to die rather than abandon certain values (the majority of which are not related to the their survival or the survival of the specie). And usually are atheists/materialists who abandoned moral values for the benefit of their race (Stailin, Hitler....)

  • @Austinite333
    @Austinite333 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    David is smart, well educated and a good story teller. Problem. He does not have a clue either 😅

  • @kevanhubbard9673
    @kevanhubbard9673 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I tend to favour a pantheistic or panentheistic view of merging with a Universal Soul.

  • @richdiana3663
    @richdiana3663 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is no afterlife without a brain, a body, and senses. Humans can't handle the truth.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An afterlife is a bit like an empty box but without the box.

  • @jonnanderson6489
    @jonnanderson6489 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    In an infinite universe, there is room for every theory.

  • @wthomas5697
    @wthomas5697 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have to question the motives of anyone selling the idea of an afterlife.

  • @BDizzleMySchnizzle
    @BDizzleMySchnizzle หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Then there is the original Hebrew belief that there was pretty much nothing after death. Just the grave.

    • @simonhibbs887
      @simonhibbs887 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A lot of Zoroastrianism was ported directly into Judaism during and after the Babylonian exile, including separate heaven and hell, and apocalyptic end times followed by resurrection of the body.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      A probable clever postulate or position. Not stupid enough to make wild assumptions about impossible realms.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    soul is maintained in natural way? develops with natural life, then continues on from natural life?

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes all the dinosouls and biosouls are together in the after life with God. Why else would you exist.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Soul is a bit outdated what the human is is survival in form or is a conscious agent, I myself just like survival agent which is available or conscious. I stipulate conscious agent or survival agent instead of soul to make considerations for the other dinosouls and biosouls which have existed in space time which could not go to the afterlife or heaven. I shouldn't have to tell you why.

  • @DamienMcKinnon
    @DamienMcKinnon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do we know for sure we're not in one right now?

    • @keithmarshall7715
      @keithmarshall7715 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are.

    • @DamienMcKinnon
      @DamienMcKinnon หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@keithmarshall7715 it was a rhetorical question

  • @scott-qk8sm
    @scott-qk8sm หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Endless consciousness would be a nightmare

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Consciousness is built for this world of survival or the attempt to continue or survive. Its an extension of complexity or abstract from the ability to stay alive or survive. All extensions or material evolution is built for survival including consciousness or they are survival evolved with the help of material complexity.

    • @hazaraudi7488
      @hazaraudi7488 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why though?

    • @sujok-acupuncture9246
      @sujok-acupuncture9246 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Physicists have become aware of this impossibility. Whatever you do, only the form changes.
      But nothing can be destroyed in the objective world.
      The same is true about the world of consciousness, of life. There is no death. Death is only a change from one form into another form, and ultimately from form to formlessness.
      Only Gautam Buddha has given the right word for this experience. In English it is difficult to translate it, because languages develop only after experience. It is just arbitrarily that I am calling it "enlightenment." But it is very arbitrary; it does not really give you the sense that Buddha's word gives. He calls it nirvana.Nirvana means ceasing to be. Strange... ceasing to be. Not to be is nirvana. That does not mean that you are no more; it simply means you are no longer an entity, embodied.
      Osho ..from the book..."From the false to the truth '.

    • @ProjectMoff
      @ProjectMoff หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@MasterofOne-zl6urthat doesn’t explain why behaviour needs an actual witness, why can’t it all just be blind physicals processes like a computer? The idea that consciousness is needed for life to evolve and stay alive is basically just saying “it’s needed because it is”, there’s no explanation there, why does a witness help? Reactions happen in nature without consciousness, plants, fungus etc, why does behaviour need consciousness?

  • @aporist
    @aporist หลายเดือนก่อน

    After life is the morning when you wake up with a heavy hangover.

  • @PhillipYewTree
    @PhillipYewTree หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    David is describing the opinion of others. He has no evidence. But one day he will experience the truth.

    • @hazaraudi7488
      @hazaraudi7488 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does anybody has evidence of afterlife?

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes this is so true, Survival is merely extended into the unknow realm but like consciousness extension of abstract survival realm now it is true. One just wants survival exists in death that's all it is because survival now is so strong of an exponent. This is because in actual reality survival itself is in every structure of our biological self in every instance including consciousness itself which is survival manifest of abstract kind.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Religion allows or has shown that they are willing to sacrifice survival now for a fake postulate of afterlife survival which has all sought of issues present like the ability to blow up oneself and others to reach afterlife survival while at the same time destroying survival now or self because of some poor idiots opinion about it. This is the proof that Religion is self defeating to put so much trust in the afterlife at the expense of now or survival in consciousness now.
      I don't and cant trust this sought of mentality or crazy gymnastics.

  • @TheUltimateSeeds
    @TheUltimateSeeds หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ask people like Joseph Merrick (aka, the "Elephant Man") and others with like him with severe physical deformities, how they feel about bodily resurrection. I suggest that the human body is nothing more than a sort of "cosmic placenta" that is left behind after the soul is born out of it via death. Think of cemeteries as being "gardens of afterbirth."

    • @chokispokis
      @chokispokis 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The resurrection proposed by tradition would be perfect. Since evil was eradicated, bodies would no longer have deformities.

    • @chokispokis
      @chokispokis 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It is assumed that after the resurrection the bodies will be perfect

  • @codymarch164
    @codymarch164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Afterlife - after life, or the 'before life', i.e., place or source prior to or substratum of the existential. Embodiment implies subjection to, or vexation and unrest; an indigent state, requiring nutriment and sustenance, and maintenance due to the fragmented elements of the bodies compisition and the subtle bodies constituents, i.e., sense perception, sensation, mentation; therefore desires arises, notions of lack or lost, ultimately further immersing persons into the fragmented state, anithesis to union or wholeness. The ' after life' - state of peace: freedom from disturbence; tranquillity. State of rest. Simplicity. Oneness. There's 2 things in phenomena: either one thing is the shower head or the drain; what we perceive, feel, experience in phenomena is the shower head; where things go after the existential is dissipating to the drain, back to the abode the water(state of rest; intertia; actual energy) remained prior to the shower head, which represents the releasing of energy. There's an essence that remains, Atman, or the Self, so the wise men teach. The 'after life' is the ceasaation of agitation, change, evolution, desire, suffering, fragmentation, disparate, delusion, outwardness. The 'after life' is what's prior to the existential.
    There can be no other way. Yes, God is. The only thing we can argue are the theories of.

    • @anteodedi8937
      @anteodedi8937 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “…after life is what's prior to the existential..."
      That's incoherent crap. That's like saying there is "existence" prior to "existence".
      That cannot be the case because it entails a logical contradiction. There is nothing prior to existence/there is only existence.
      What happened to your other account btw? 😂

    • @anteodedi8937
      @anteodedi8937 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@codymarch164 It's just that you preach your nonsensical religion 24/7 in the comment section, and I cannot miss the chance to laugh at your comments. They are a good source of entertainment, after all. I can give you that much credit…nothing personal 😂

    • @codymarch164
      @codymarch164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@anteodedi8937 I heard soon they're going to be rolling out harsh penalties concering professional online trolling. You're part of a very criminal activity.

  • @xxxs8309
    @xxxs8309 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How will you resurrect a body if it was ashed? Resurrection of any is a spiritual one.

  • @Rosiedelaroux
    @Rosiedelaroux หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hilarious

  • @rochford59
    @rochford59 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is an Afterlife,well time will tell?...and that applies to all things,we're all part of whole on a Universal scale!...still l would love to see those who have passed again,or maybe its a pipe dream?🤔

  • @stevep5408
    @stevep5408 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I came from nothing, I find it hard to expect I will exist for half of eternity? Then again I believe in God not because I think I am going to heaven, I just met, seen and heard of so many SOBs I should see in hell?

  • @Misitheus
    @Misitheus 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I pray there is nothing....

  • @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu
    @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds like his aim is to slander opposition.

  • @NataliaCh93
    @NataliaCh93 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is na afterlife? Easy answer, it's just living further only after the death of the body, cause there's not a thing like a resurection clinic death yeah, resurection no, afterlife is just a thing where our conciousness/soul is living and not always going to heaven or hell or to the other side, afterlife means new possibilities like taking care of our close ones, it means that often our soul/conciousness loves with regrets, mistakes that we can't let go of, or blaming ourselfs for something, and afterlife is a thing where You know more that You knew before like what will happen that didn't happen yet. Shorter it's just living without body and living with more possibilities and learning new things that are on the other side after physical death

    • @abeahmed2581
      @abeahmed2581 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where's your proof that it exists? Why do you believe in it

    • @NataliaCh93
      @NataliaCh93 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@abeahmed2581 Cause I see souls/spirits/ghosts since I was 6 almost 7 year old girl, it's a genetic gift in my family

    • @mariokovac9572
      @mariokovac9572 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How did you make this conclusions 😅talking with ghost 👻

    • @NataliaCh93
      @NataliaCh93 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mariokovac9572 I live with ghosts/spirits/souls since my childhood to this day and they taught me many things and told me what I needed to know

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@abeahmed2581 There's no proof its just a postulation of survival or consciousness subject into the unknown realm of death. The real issue is does a dinosaur go to heaven or this place and all the other creatures that have existed if they have been good dinosaurs or is it bias. Humans have blown themselves up to reach this place and destroyed themselves in the process to reach it. But the problem is this, they don't exist now and turned on survival to reach a fake postulate of survival because of someone's silly opinion that its real. Thats the issue I think. We should avoid this outlook if the possibility is self destruction or if others have proven it with actions. I think it takes away the importance of survival now and creates importance of survival in an unknown sphere of existence which is how are we to know. If we do survive death then that is good but I don't it matters, what we can do now is survive on earth try and build ships or crafts to extend life elsewhere in case of an asteroid extinction event and avoid it now like our natural disposition is like survival. I dont trust these Religions that blow themselves up to survive in the afterlife if you know what I mean, it seems counter productive to life or my extinct. However I could be wrong.

  • @biorbfan
    @biorbfan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When we die is it possible to be reborn back in time ? not as if everything goes forwards ?

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      No one knows if your honest, most postulations have a motive or postulate in other arenas usually for power or basically just to seem clever or smart. Postulations of basic survival into the future and unknown realm because of human nature or the disposition of survival it is so strong in life that it wants to extend this survival everywhere.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should try it and if you don't see what happens.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Know one knows if someone tells you they do don't believe them or be very suspicious as there probably very superficial. Take this example. Does a dinosaur have a soul or a snake have a soul or is it just a conscious agent trying to survive in its habitat. If the snake behaves itself or if a dinosaur is a good dino will I see it in heaven or not if it consumes other dinos?
      When you actually grow up you realize that these fake postulates are nothing more than superficial knowledge or the appearance of wisdom or knowledge based on pure speculative ideas. What the real postulate is is a representation of survival itself into the unknown domain of death thus the creation of a place to go where the dinos soul is free and may roam. This is where they could be also.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      If I tell you that I know for sure that a dinosaur soul is real but I cant show you it is you just have to believe me what would you believe? Or if I make up any story I like would you believe that a dinosaur soul is in heaven with the Lion souls. Is this better?

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to realize that those historical peoples didn't know that much didn't realize about evolution and survival of the fittest were oblivious to dinosaur bones and history. You could say they were self centred individuals or ignorant really but it was not there fault you see. Some man or lady told someone a story around a chunk of meat cooking on a fire in history and they just believed them you see, but if they could only understand about dino souls and snake souls they could of known reality .
      Dino souls could be a thing.

  • @sherrybreslau1497
    @sherrybreslau1497 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "The body is a nudge" is one of the funniest comments I"ve heard in awhile :)

  • @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu
    @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also, stay out of my personal data, do not use my personal data and data analytics on my personal for anything related to your content.

    • @Jun_kid
      @Jun_kid หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      If you are so concerned, you shouldn't be posting anything on the internet, especially TH-cam.

    • @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu
      @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Jun_kid It's not the comment information I post on here. It's the information when I'm going about my everyday life. It's more intrusive than comment section stuff, they are going far beyond that.

  • @anxious-robot
    @anxious-robot หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A new Mario in the sim.

  • @sujok-acupuncture9246
    @sujok-acupuncture9246 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When opium toxicity fills the brain...ut takes one full night to come down. When theology toxicity fills the brain...it stays till the grave.

  • @cujimmy1366
    @cujimmy1366 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is life or consciousness Mortality immortal.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      We can only suggest that you try and use your consciousness to survive when you can and if you cant be conscious of survival be good at it.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Consciousness is this world not an imaginary world of survival or extended force to death, it combats death naturally. The reason you don't risk death or choose it is because of this will to continue or survive which is universal. Every piece of you or what you are made of is built for survival from your tits, to your eyes to your hair everything is an elaboration of this will to survive. The afterlife is a place where this survival urge or disposition can have a place after death but its just an opinion or after thought of the will to survive. Even your language and conscious states are dispositions or elaborations of survival itself. With out this will to live or survive or continue evolution would not happen.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Immortality is a postulate of survival into the unknown realm or future, nothing more. It is the beauty of survival itself but it is limited to this world as far as we know if your honest. We all want to believe in something greater something more to life after death this is normal but don't fool yourself thinking you know something that is unknowable.
      That postulate is harmful to others and it is realised and shown to be so.

  • @Lightbearer616
    @Lightbearer616 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    An afterlife is a period where you get eaten by bacteria and insects and eventually end up in a star.

  • @holgerjrgensen2166
    @holgerjrgensen2166 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is NO 'after-life', Only the Eternal Life,
    so, Day-Consciousness Never Sleep,
    it just goes in Circuits, Day/Night and Larger,
    pictured in the Rainbow.
    Orange is 'our color', physical Gravity-Beings,
    the other colors, is our Night-Bodies, Deep Sleep.
    Via our Coupling-Body, REM, We move the Day-Consciousness,
    from our Gravity-Body to the Feeling-Body, Yellow, at sleep.
    (> Intelligence/Green, > Intuition/Blue, > Memory/Indigo, >)
    And enter the Gravity-Body, from the Instinct-Body, Red, when wake.
    After leaving the Gravity-Body permanent, 'dead',
    We will 'stay' in the Night-Bodies, same time, as our physical age,
    so younger people comes soon back, but even very old,
    max. 100 years in the Night-Bodies.

  • @votingcitizen
    @votingcitizen หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Not much "truth" to be found in unmeasurable, unknowable discussions. Faith, belief, etc. are purely subjective concepts that can mean anything or nothing depending on whatever you want. Not "truth".

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Postulations of this world of survival or continuation postulated into the unknown domain or sphere with a reference to truth or knowledge of the impossible. It shows how powerful the will to survive really is as it wants to go into every domain even a conscious agent like dinosaur has it all life forms. Its called the disposition of consciousness .Its actually a postulation of ignorance with the appearance of knowledge or wisdom.

  • @sujok-acupuncture9246
    @sujok-acupuncture9246 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    After resurrection world population will be atleast 50000000000 billions. This is a type of religion. There are many many such religions in the world....

  • @A.Muslim.girl.from.Yemen-
    @A.Muslim.girl.from.Yemen- หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am your sister from Yemen, and by Allah I only spoke out of hunger and distress. My mother, my brothers, and I lessons and tears. We are in a situation that only God knows about. God is sufficient for us, and He is the best disposer of affairs for those who brought us to this situation. By Allah Almighty, I did not write this appeal out of distress and distress. Poverty, O world, they have felt it So, I hope for you. By Allah Almighty, Lord of the Great Throne, he ate what I had in the house. By Allah, my brothers, he is my brothers by sitting in the house. Who has no food? By God, we are in a very difficult situation. We have 4 people entering the house, and my father has died, and there is no one who can depend on us and who lives in it.We live in a rented house because we cannot pay the rent we owe. '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''' My brother, my first words are: I swear to God that I will not lie to you or deceive you. I am a Yemeni girl displaced from the war. My family and I live in a rented house in Al-Shahrab 20,000 Yemenis among us, and now we owe 60,000 for 3 months. The owner of the house is one of the people who does not have mercy, by God, my brother. He comes every day, insulting us, talking about us, and moving from the house to the street because we were unable to pay him the rent. The neighbors saw us crying and came back.They came back to talk to the neighbors and we were given the weekend. So we made him swear by God. He will take us out into the street. Have mercy on him and us. Our country is due to this war and we do not find food for our day, and my brothers and I live in a difficult life. Our father died, may God have mercy on him, and we have no one in this world who was with us in these harsh circumstances. My younger brothers went out into the street and saw...The neighbors eat and stand at their door in order to give them bread even if they break it. By God, to whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth, they closed the door and expelled them and came back crying. They are dying of hunger. No one has mercy on them and a holiday is returned. I have made a living, and now if one of us helps us with a kilo of flour, I swear to God, I am dying of hunger. My brother, I am an alien to God. Then, I ask you to help me for the sake of God. I ask you, by God, to love goodness and to help me, even if you can, by messaging me on WhatsApp.On this number 00967716649494 and ask for the name of my card and send it and do not be late and may God reward you with all the best, my brothers Sagar, see how they are and help us and save us before they throw us out in the street, you will be lost or we will die of hunger. My family and I ask you, by God, if you are able to help us, do not be late and may God reward you well..`/--~«««~-♡~♡~♡~~•~•~♡~♡~♡~♡~♡~♡♡♡~~~: ~:~¡~¡~¡~;I.i.i.i.i.i. i.I.|-◖:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;::;:;:;:;:;

  • @evaadam3635
    @evaadam3635 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "What is Immortality or Afterlife?"
    It means your Awareness is eternal because Awareness is your immortal soul which is a free split of the Holy Spirit who has no beginning and no end.
    What dies and rots is your physical human vessel when its cells, tissues, organs, or DNA disorganizes. Your immortal soul has no DNA to disorganize to undergo physical death and, so, will survive when the physical body dies...
    The above is also the reason that science, until today, still is clueless as to the building blocks or elemental components of your Awareness or Consciousness and can not understand why Consciousness can freely choose TO BELIEVE anything that defies the properties of physical matter..
    Humans possess free immortal souls with the power of free will to choose what to believe that makes them accountable. This is why humans are unique...
    .. Animals have no free souls but are only driven by natural instincts beyond its control, not free and so not accountable. The word "SELF" that humans commonly used to define their being is your free immortal soul...
    ...Self is a recognition of independence from the physical world including independence from our physical bodies... A robot, or computer, driven by its programmed switches can not have a sense of independence, no different than animals that are driven by natural instincts as its program..
    ...but human beings can freely feel or sense this independence which shows clearly that we are NOT ALL PHYSICAL ! From understanding the light that I received, our selves are our free immortal souls sent here for a chance of salvation through regaining the faith that we lost..
    ... but you only have ONE SELF which is your free conscious immortal soul who never sleeps, always awake, who is the free entity who can independently observes dreams and can even freely choose to fly in your dreams while the brain is snoring..
    So, yes, of course, your TRUE BEING is not physical and can not die a physical death.... and whether your immortal soul ends up in Heaven or hell relies solely on what you believe or not believe before your temporary physical life ends...

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are confusing souls with a conscious agent. In survival terms conscious agent is correct because you only class a human as having a soul and so it lacks historical balance and consistency If you say that all living things have a soul and go to heaven then this is much more balanced but its probably false. You have to take in account if a dinosaur goes to heaven and if its behaviour was suitable for heaven or not and in fact you must use this method to all biological entities that were before human evolution. That means the behaviour aspect must be included with biological structure and all not just humans.

  • @Jun_kid
    @Jun_kid หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    After life = Before life.
    How can one talk about "After life" without speaking about "Before life"?
    It is like speaking about night without speaking about day. Impossible to be either intelligible or comprehensive.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      You cant honestly talk about it. You can postulate it but to speak of such things is pure superficiality or ignorance. Be mindful.

    • @Jun_kid
      @Jun_kid หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MasterofOne-zl6ur True.
      However . . . one can certainly talk honestly about it by understanding that both birth and death are only pause-points (and not begin or end points) in the journey.

  • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
    @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

    The afterlife is a postulation of the will to survive as Schopenhauer postulates which is correct. This will to survive thinks of the future the past to best help that subject or material entity to survive in its habitat and it is not that hard to understand that the will to survive is so engrained in material substance it even can contemplate this survival into the afterlife which is postulation of survival into the unknown sphere. The problem is we have no real understanding of death or the afterlife except the present force of the will to live or survive in this world which is a disposition of material entities to avoid death because of the unknown sphere of death which we have no real comprehension of except complete speculation or postulates of this world of survival into the future.
    One would have to postulate in this regard that in history of evolution of life every life form would be available to go to heaven or this afterlife including dinosaurs. giraffes. lions, zebras and alligators or that these particular entities have a soul. However its more likely that being a conscious agent is the correct disposition or definition not soul because of this situation or problem and that this conscious agent proceeds in this survival world best when it is conscious of it, and it also can best stay alive when it has a conscious mode or function because without it it would be most difficult to stay alive. This survival conscious postulate is best to be used because it has no bias as soul does like does the dinosaur go to heaven if it behaves good or does a zebra go to heaven if it behaves good. This is why a conscious agent built for survival is good because it explains why a dinosaur did and has consciousness and it explains what it is used for. Without consciousness the chance for survival or continuation of material entity is severely stifled and impossible or you cannot partake in the survival process itself and it is probable that it in fact is an expression or extension of survival if you chose to takeaway consciousness or being then survival is most difficult, if we want to try and define its merit or purpose or definition.
    Every human extension or bit of life form in its disposition and character or what it is made of is built for the soul purpose of survival or it is a function or is survival in form, including language and consciousness all are expressions of survival or continuation to avoid death. This is why you don't blow yourself up because of this disposition and character to avoid death. The postulation of an afterlife has proven to be quite silly in this regard because of this problem and shows the point rather well and is a signal to its maturity or lack of vision in survival itself because afterlife saves you. This is the problem with Religion it allows for destruction of self to reach death so that you may survive somewhere else but unfortunately for them the story ends at the expense of themselves with no real foundation for it as it lacks survival now which is important to survive in this world not an imaginary world or opinion of an old human method or thought. The extension of survival of consciousness or life in this aspect to an unknown realm creates real life issues for others now but also real issues for themselves as they no longer exist also. Not very clever. They have been manipulated and tricked to hurt themselves to reach another sphere of survival but at the expense of real life survival in this world which is bad for them as they take a risk with no real evidence of life after death. This has and is a major issues for these individuals and its quite a disappointment.
    Most if not all postulates into the afterlife must answer the question of dino conscious agents why it was conscious and what about the soul of dinosaurs or dinosouls, what happens to it after it disappears. Its nice to pretend that you know what happens but It will forever remain a mystery and what we can do while where here on earth is survive and continue and try to avoid death by being a conscious agent where possible like the dinosaurs. If you start extending a human conscious agent into the afterlife you have to extend this non bias to all life forms which becomes a bit problematic or confusing and it allows for destruction of self which is anti survival in its disposition.
    The left position allows for life to be destroyed or it destroys the future of life going against survival itself by abortion which is false or bad practice, or it destroys human consciousness or self, while the right lives in a world of fake postulates or has a hierarchy issue with knowledge or power but still understands the true postulate of survival in the story of Jesus Christ, but it still tries to deny evolution because it holds answers into the true nature of reality. This is why there are issues or problems because of this reason and its plain to see. Abortion has destroyed more human lives than all wars combined and is humans most disastrous political ploy in history.
    What I do believe is that they did not have the knowledge or information to understand evolution theories of life how it began the cosmos so postulated what they could from the little clear information that was present to best understand the world. But when the information does arrive then its time to revaluate those postulates with the truth to mature and evolve with that new technical data.
    One can only hope that individuals come to there senses on this issue. Schopenhauer. One must soon realize into the future that dinosaurs are not just conscious agents surviving on a rock flying through time and space but also that they have unique souls as conscious agents that do go to heaven where they speak to God through Dino Souls.
    This is a new method of interpretation and could hold clues into the true nature of reality.

  • @maxpower252
    @maxpower252 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A fairy tale.

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Every theory he discusses is just somebody’s wishful thinking. And each and every one of them are equal in that they all lack even a shred of evidence

  • @gsr4535
    @gsr4535 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Answer: there is none.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      It will be what it will be, what we should do though while we are here on earth is survive both as a single unit or entity and as a species. This is why we are here to survive and evolve into something greater. Hegel was right but it was back to front.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Id suggest that survival is so predominant in us that we wish to extend it into the unknow future including consciousness itself, into the sphere of death which is highly speculative and delusional. Religious zealots have even blown themselves up to reach afterlife but unfortunately for them they don't survive now which is an issue for them or not. Its hard to say for sure.

    • @MasterofOne-zl6ur
      @MasterofOne-zl6ur หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does a dinosaur have a soul or is it just conscious and surviving? What do you think.

    • @gsr4535
      @gsr4535 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MasterofOne-zl6ur Yes but too many nowadays want to hasten the "evolve" into trans-humanism. Human and machine (AI) network. I can only hope I'll be gone before that happens, which I'm afraid I won't.

  • @michelangelope830
    @michelangelope830 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Soy un psicólogo increíblemente importante y persona de muchos talentos y quiero ser respetado. No quiero ser el hazme reir de la gente. No quiero que se me vacile. No quiero que se me tome el pelo. No quiero que la gente se ría a mi costa. No quiero que la gente se ría de mi. No quiero que se tome por el pito de un sereno. No quiero hacer el trabajo de los demás. No quiero hacer favores a desagradecidos. Me siento humillado, me da vergüenza contar lo que me ha sucedido. Me siento usado. Me siento maltatado. Siento que me han hecho daño intencionadamente, sabiendo lo que se hace, a posta, y siendo ignorante de las consecuencias. ¿Cual son las consecuencias de hacer daño a Dios? ¿Cual son las consecuencias de hacer daño a la realidad? Quiero una disculpa pública. Quiero que el malhechor se disculte públicamente, delante de toda la humanidad. Soy vulnerable y debil, y evito la confrontación y se aprovechan de mi. Quiero cambiar y hacerme respetar. Hablando se entiende la gente. Quiero un encuentro cara a cara, quiero solucionar la situación de una vez por todas. ¿Tengo razón y no debería estar haciendo el trabajo de los demás para ayudar hasta el punto en el que los trabajadores se mofan de la situación? Vivo incrédulo, perplejo, anonadado, alienado, alucinado, sufriendo, porque soy yo el que ha descubierto la naturaleza de Dios, no tú, y te estoy diciendo que eres miembro de una secta de la que yo salí siendo honesto gracias a Dios. El ateísmo y religión son sectas que hacen daño a Dios. Has hecho daño a Dios, literalmente, me has hecho daño a mi, has hecho un daño increíble a la perfección, has hecho daño a la perfecta vida. Dios es literalmente todo lo que existe, pasado presente y futuro. ¿Por qué me ha pasado en el trabajo lo que me ha pasado? Para mí es un trauma lo que me ha pasado en el trabajo. Soy una persona intensa y profunda y se dan malentendidos cuando la gente no sabe realmente quien eres. Yo he descubierto que el ateismo es una falacia lógica que asume Dios es la idea religiosa del creador de la creación y concluye erróneamente que el creador no existe porque una idea particular de Dios no existe. ¿Por qué estoy trabajando en Londres en una fábrica en un turno de tarde-noche haciendo donuts en la sección de pastelería teniendo un conflicto serio con un compañero de trabajo? Estoy ya sobrecargado de estres con lo que tengo y además ahora tengo que quejarme. Me quejo de cómo funciona el mundo y de cómo a la gente no le importa. Cualquier descubrimiento de conocimiento debería ser primera página en todas las plataformas informativas inmediatamente. ¿Qué debo hacer para que la gente entienda quien soy yo? ¿Debo secuestrar a alguno con una espada samurai o llamar la atención de otra manera? Las cosas no funcionan como deberían funcionar porque la mala intención se disfraza de buena intención. El agresor es víctima de si mismo. ¿Ha quien impresionas necesitando siempre ayuda? ¿Puedes hacer el trabajo o no puedes hacerlo? Solo necesito tiempo para hacer cambios. Necesito cambiar mi vida. Quiero que la humanidad juzgue por si misma si tengo razón y merezco una disculpa pública o si no la tengo y nadie ha hecho nada malo. A mi se me ha pedido cordialmente de ayudar, ¿puedes por favor coger los "custards" del frigorífero?. Me da vergüenza contarlo, me siento como un tonto, ¡a estas alturas de mi recuperación de la adicción! De verdad que me dan ganas de llorar. Soy un adicto en recuperación y sé lo que vale un peine, más que oro inútil dentro de una caja fuerte. Tengo que hacerme respetar, tengo que mejorar, sé quien soy y lo que estoy haciendo y tengo que dar ejemplo. Tengo que hacer ver que el panteismo funciona para solucionar los conflictos. Siento que me han tratado como si fuese tonto. Y lo he sido, ¡qué vergüenza!. Me avergüenzo del pasado, pero es lo que es y no se puede cambiar. ¿Tú que harías si fueses yo? ¿Qué dirías, cómo lo dirías, cuando lo dirías, a quien se lo dirías? Si contestas a mi última pregunta sabré que estás vivo. ¿Estás preparado para ser famoso?. Tengo que decir a alguien para. Tengo que decir a alguien te estas aprovechando de mi buena voluntad. Tengo que decir a alguien que pienso quiere hacerme creer que quiere ser mi amigo y no lo es que me ha hecho daño su comportamiento inprocedente. Ha llamado la atención sobre si mismo haciéndome cómplice para ser un hazmereir, de lo que los otros hablan divertidos. ¿Digo la verdad?Los hechos no pueden ser negados porque hay testigos. Todos han visto lo que estaba sucediendo y ahora hay que juzgar si merezco una disculpa privada o pública, o si nadie ha hecho nada malo, o si soy yo el que ha aceptado voluntariamente como un favor hacer el trabajo de los demás hasta el punto de ser cotilleo y no tengo nada de lo que quejarme. Soy un poeta y artista buscando la belleza y tranquilidad en un mundo deshonesto y hostil. Para encontrar a Dios tienes que entender que la realidad es eterna porque de la nada no puede ser creado algo y leer Spinoza. Si piensas en lo que te he dicho te sentirás increíblemente mejor. Gracias.

  • @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
    @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The single word *"Afterlife"* is a self-contained proposition. With no other words or information attached to it, the *default proposition* is that an afterlife "exists." So, the proposition, _"We will have new bodies in the afterlife!"_ already accepts that an afterlife "exists," and now we're merely deciding how it will be manifested.
    ... Logic says we have to determine whether an afterlife actually "exists" before we can determine how it is made manifest.
    So, if you define "Afterlife" as _"continued existence beyond physical death,"_ then the spectrum of possibilities is much broader. You could exist as anything between a shimmering, God-like entity to a decaying blob of biological matter that breaks down to form other representations of life.
    "Conceivability" determines what can or cannot exist. If something is *logically conceivable,* that doesn't mean it _must_ exist, but rather that the odds for its existence cannot be set to zero. There are no logical barriers to conceiving an existence after physical death, ... _so it is, at the very least, possible!_ However, how that existence is made manifest is up for grabs.
    My view is that all I've ever known is "Existence." At no point during my lifetime have I ever experienced "Nonexistence." Even under anesthesia, my only experience is counting down from one hundred to maybe 92, ... and then magically appearing in a different hospital room. The same goes for everyone else. "Existence" only deals with things that exist and it would be totally illogical for "Existence" to hand over anything to the nothing realm of "Nonexistence." ... After all, "Nonexistence" offers _nothing_ in return.
    ... It is a fact that nobody has ever subjectively experienced "Nonexistence!"
    That being said, I'm giving "Existence" the benefit of the doubt. If all I've ever experienced is "Existence" and "Nonexistence" is not something that can be experienced, then it is logical to consider that my existence will continue indefinitely.

    • @codymarch164
      @codymarch164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      'exist' means existential; to have come into being. Exist entails time and space - which a thing has come into, i.e., temporal and spatial, i.e., of mass and magnitude, bodies, and has a duration, i.e, inevitably an end. By you and your pretentiousness here, in denying the 'non existent', which simply means not subject to a physical body or time, you now have rendered your model most irrational. The model you now posit is most indigent of subsistence - there is something prior to the existential or phenomena affording this energy to all essences, beings, and bodies; too, you indirectly here posit that things existential, of their own selves do they bestow being, upon themselves, therefore they can come into being, and giving themselves life before they had ever had any existence.
      - this is absolutely insane and most degenerate of theorem. This occurs when one tries to fit the cosmos into their own mind instead of breaking out from a conditioned mind and into truth.

    • @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
      @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@codymarch164 *"exist' means existential; to have come into being."*
      ... Yes, correct.
      *"Exist entails time and space - which a thing has come into, i.e., temporal and spatial, i.e., of mass and magnitude, bodies, and has a duration, i.e, inevitably an end."*
      ... That's too narrow of a definition for "Existence." How much space does a concept require? What is the mass of a thought or a number? How much time is required to process 1 + 1 = 2?
      *"By you and your pretentiousness here, in denying the 'non existent', which simply means not subject to a physical body or time, you now have rendered your model most irrational."*
      ... (See above).
      *"there is something prior to the existential or phenomena affording this energy to all essences, beings, and bodies; too, you indirectly here posit that things existential, of their own selves do they bestow being, upon themselves, therefore they can come into being, and giving themselves life before they had ever had any existence."*
      ... I have no idea how you extrapolated all of that out of my opening comment.
      *"this is absolutely insane and most degenerate of theorem"*
      ... Well, that's fine because what you wrote is certainly not my theorem. However, I did enjoy reading your most eloquent Shakespearian prose.

    • @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
      @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC หลายเดือนก่อน

      @fartpooboxohyeah8611 *"But logic itself is but a human invention, concept or theory which may or may not have any relevancy beyond our current physical existence. In other word; we don't know what we don't know."*
      ... If the universe (that existed before humans) demonstrates mathematical orchestration, and only "logically conceivable" propositions can exist, then logic is not a human invention and is relevant to all things.
      After all, what data processing system did you use to reach your conclusion? ... Deductive reasoning?

    • @codymarch164
      @codymarch164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLCyou define Tesla, Poincare, Maxwell, Steinmetz, Heaviside and Pythagoras, Plato, Plotinus, Proclus as shakespearian. You think you're smarter than Poincare, Tesla and Pythagoes and plotinus, etc.
      You must be self centered, because you do think you call the shots and run the show.
      You have that little book you need to cator to.

    • @codymarch164
      @codymarch164 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC "that's to narrow of a definition for existence"
      Hey. You accused me of 'word salad' yesterday, now you're telling me I'm giving to narrow of a definition.... do you want to make this into something else?
      I'm calling you out. You're a sophist fraud. And a coward.

  • @michelangelope830
    @michelangelope830 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a psychologist and person of many talents and I want you to understand how i understand God's eternal hell and heaven. The true God is Spinoza's God and reality is the only that matters. Imagine you are a devoted muslim and you prayed 5 times a day during all your life from the moment your parents told you that if you don't obey Allah he will punish you. You trusted your parents and you believed them. Now imagine you die and you discover the truth, Allah doesn't exist and you prayed for nothing, you wasted your time, you talked to a non a existent God, you were deceived by the people you thought love you the most. We only have one life and it is forever. We only have one shot at life and it is forever. You did what you did and it is forever. How do you feel? Bear in mind eternity is an awful long time being oneself unhappy having been deceived with a lie that looks like a lie. God is perfect, like you would like reality to be. Reality matters, our decisions matter because God exists. If you accept God is necessary because logically it is impossible the existence of the creation without the creator would you accept humanity are deceived believing because too many people lie too much? The most important knowledge is to understand I exist. Was the Quran memorized? I want to know the truth. What would be the future of atheism and christianity if atheists and christians continue to refuse to ask for proof that the Quran was memorized? To not waste this loving poem i say atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. Thank you.

    • @thecarman3693
      @thecarman3693 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now imagine you die and everything stops. You no longer exist. No thoughts, no anything. You are no more than the billions of years before you were born.
      Simply put, you cannot realize the futility of religious beliefs.