does the Code only work for the UK or only for specific purchases? I tried it from Germany and it does not work: "The discount code BARKANDJACK could not be applied"
Tyrannimo89 the code should be global. It only works with the minimum spend of £5000, or equivalent. Let me know if you’re spending over £5,000 and it still doesn’t work and I’ll get them to check it.
A 16520 Zenith Daytona cost a brick jouse to service! Just sold mine unserviced since Rolex AD claimed that service parts are becoming scarce on the Zenith 16520 movement and the service price is 60 % more expensive than on the 116520/116500 which is already not cheap. Another reason for the steap service price on a Zenith movement is that it consists of a lot more (non Rolex) parts, in total more than 30 % additional components to service for Rolex i.e. takes longer time to disassemble/assemble/clean/exchange etc. ADVISE/WARNING: Only buy a Zenith Daytona if you plan NOT to wear it!!!
@@modernworldiscrap Should´nt cost more for a simple disassembly, ultrasonic clean, change of gasket and assembly, but wait until the day it needs Zenith spare parts!
All of these are stunning. When I decided to get one I looked at everything, went and held everyone of these in my hand. After weighing up all the differences I went with the 16520, it was between the two older models as I feel that in the long run they will hold their value best. I went with the 16520 ad not only did I like the small details better, the size of the subdials, that they are a little bit smaller and placed a tad lower on the dial, that they do not have the shiny silver surround. That the left subdial is the running seconds, something I feel is more in line with where I think this should be as Speedmasters and other have it there too.The thinner more elegant hands, the smaller time markers. Some say as tritium lose it's shine after a couple of decades the luminova version is better but I like that the tritium change colour and also change the way it works, makes it more vintage, more interesting. I will ALWAYS go for the tritium version of any watch given the choise. The last years fall of the prices specially for the ceramic model whilst the 16520 has lost much less value I think shows which model that will gain more in value as time goes by.
1:57 Although you're right, there's actually an easier-to-remember way to distinguish a Zenith from a non-Zenith model, one that can't be unseen: draw/imagine a line from the 9 to the 3 marker. The sub-registers' center is not aligned properly on the non-Zenith models to the diameter of the dial. Ugly AF imho...
There is no rule that says they must be crossing that horizontal line equidistantly. Making the subdials larger was one of the things they managed without increasing the case size, the tradeoff was making those subdials slightly higher.
My favourite is the Zenith-Daytona, I like the thinner hands (which you occasionally find in some 116520, but rarely), and the finer and longer "boat shape" hour markers, I feel it looks more refined. Also love the sub-dials location, they have a better placement, more symmetric and aligned with the 3 hands mov. The 16520 has so many variance, the 4 lines, floating dial, inverted 6, porcelain dial, and the various bezels marking... This is the oldest "modern day" Daytona as we know it today.
I have 4 daytonas. Both of these newer steel daytonas & a bi metal zenith. I cant get my head around why people prefer these zeniths. The watch feels so much flimsier. Favourite for me is the ceramic without a doubt.
I think I would go for the 116520. Looks incredible, wears really well, the movement is great and it's very slim for a Chronograph. It's a near if not perfect chronograph imo. 👌🏻 Great Video Adrian!
I own the white dial 116520 and the bezel plays the light in different ways. Sometimes it is sparkly white, sometimes black and sometimes it looks like the polished metal it is. The C-tona just has a black bezel that is less dynamic in regards to how it plays the light. The same argument can be made for the white dial vs the black dial. White is just bright and pops on the wrist whereas black is just dark in all light conditions.
As has always been the case with any Sub, regarding the current Daytona if you’re planning on wearing it with suits on a regular basis it’s best to select the black dial variant.
I've dropped over $100k at my AD and he asked me for a "trade" "my original 50th anniversary Sub or my Hulk)to get in line for a new 41mm something or other. LOL, I don't want to trade anything so I guess I'll be waiting to stumble across one in some AD in East Bum F.
I love that ceramic one... probably the only Rolex that does anything for me... that white face with the black rimmed subdials is just incredible... stunning imagery as usual Adrian!
Had both a (white) 116520 and a (black) 16520 for a number of years. While superior technically (movement, bracelet), I just sold the 116520 to keep only the 16520. It is more refined, and that Zenith movement just make it a bit more special in my view, despite its limitations (non-hacking, smaller power reserve).
I have a 116520 black and regretted not getting the white too when the price wasn't as crazy... I remember seeing one for sale on a AD store but I just didn't have the money to afford another one back then...
Ceramic Daytona is the only watch anyone will ever need. Dressy, Casual, Sporty. You can wear it anywhere, anytime. Theres a reason why they are 2x list price. Demand demand demand. The people have spoken. As far as I am concerned all models will continue to increase with no end in sight. Great content as always
I had the Zenith version for a while and eventually let it go as I just didn’t connect with it on an emotional level... that said, it’s amazing on the wrist and I loved the feedback of the pushers and crown. A great watch to wear - even if for some models it’s challenging to tell the time :)
I like the first two steel bezel more, and i would choose the 116520 for : Super luminova (tritium is dead after 20 years or less) , 72h power reserve and (as i red on watch forums) simpler movement to service (so fewer work hours and so less expensive). Now i need 17.000€ or more to buy one on the grey market ! :)
The latest production 2014-2016 of the 116520 has chromalight too.. The 16520 is amazing with its story regarding the zenith movement and I really like the more symmetric look of the subdials. I opted for the pre ceramic version simply due to the more classic, elegant looks.
The 4130 movement is just so smooth it's unreal. You can run the 4130 all day long and it will only affect the 70 hour power reserve by a measly 2 hours!
Great video Adrian. Ideally , it would be nice to have them side by side and try them on. Rolex watches always look so much better in person and I suspect it would be much easier to decide between the 116520 and the 116500 simply by comparing black vs shiny silver bezel. Picture and video I prefer the 116520 but I suspect in real life it would be the 116500.
Its interesting you stated that daytona c has 0.5mm shorter lug than 116520. I thought the cases are 100% the same. Anyway I gave up 116520 black dial and move toward the ceramic white just because the dial is really hard to read. Way too shinny..
I love the Zenith purely because the centre of the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock subdials line up perfectly with the 3 and 9 on the dial where as the later versions don't , they are raised and it doesn't even get close for me.
I bought a Daytona 116520 a few years ago and love it, the weight is right and it wears well with a suit and jeans. I find the black dial is easier to read in the sun.
Great video. I prefer the horizontal alignment on the bezel of the 116520. And the more subdued silver sub-dial rings. I kinda wish the chronograph sub-dials aligned with the centre pinions. But it still looks great. Despite the Rolex specs, the case is more like 38.2mm. And there were different marks within each reference with the 116520 receiving Chromalight indices and hands. Keep up the great work!
Ever since I saw video pointing out the fact that the Daytona has asymmetrical lugs, I can't un-see it. Still love this watch ... simply the best proportioned and easy to wear chronograph out there.
3 of the heavyweights of the Rolex division for sure.....very iconic watches. I've had a Zenith bi metal, 116520 and would love the latest ceramic bezel one love the black touches on the sub dials has to be a white dial for me. Great watch comparisons Adrian!
Adrian, I'm biased - but I would also have to pick the 116520. I was fortunate enough to get a new one over ten years ago. I love its classic look and yes, the movement is fabulous. But for me it was simply the classic elegance of this watch that I like. It is by far the most comfortable watch to wear. I can safely predict that I will never part with it.
In my opinion the 16520 white dial is the most beautiful modern daytona, followed by the 116520 black dial. The ceramic gives its best with gold cases, f.e. the 116515ln is simply gorgeous!
Zenith is unique, ceramic is a manufactured collectible. In terms of wearability I’m definitely with you but for uniqueness and value definitely the zenith
Hi Adrian, if I had the choice and money, I‘d go for the ceramic one. I love the black and white contrast between the bezel and dial plus it is less prone to scratches. Great presentation of differences between models
3:12 This is something that almost none of Rolex's competitors understand. Yes, Rolex has the brand to bolster their image and sales, but a BIG reason why it's not easy to "just buy something else" is the fact that Rolex watches just FIT. 40mm or thereabouts, often times smaller than advertised, 11-13mm thick for most of their sports watches, and are designed with restraint. Nothing fancy, but nothing dull.
very hard choice! I think I would go with the double 116520 but the latest edition is super cool. I understand people can love and hate Rolex but these Daytonas are just so beautiful!! No disrespect to the rest of the watches out there (affordable watch collector here) but when you say chronograph... These guys jump right up to my mind! Thanks for the video. 9:40 minutes of day dreaming !
If I had to choose, would actually take none of the three but rather stick with my Zenith El Primero Rainbow. It has an easy to wear size and case dimension, solid bracelet and most of all the date function, which to me is imperative and missing on all of the Rolex Daytonas. Sure, it does not have the same reputation or monetary value like the Rolex, but it is a no nonsense watch you can wear on all occasions.
Interesting vid. It would have been worthwhile to include the two tone as well. Those are actually still available without paying absolutely insane over retail.
Years ago when they showed the new 116500 my heart sank. I thought the ceramic ruined it, I loved the steel bezel on the 116520. Ceramic looks cheap to me. The 116500 looks too much like a submariner and not enough like a Daytona.
Great video as usual. I noticed that the lug-to-lug dimensions for the 11650 is 46.5 mm compared to the two other models that are 47 mm. You didn’t highlight this detail so I am uncertain if it was just a typo? All the best!
A little bit off topic here, but I received a bark and jack Nato strap today black 22mm, folks I strongly recommend these top quality and very comfy 👍😊 will buy again
The three are pure gems. However, to me a Rolex must have a Rolex movement. And between the 116520 and the 116500 I will pick the 116520. Rolex hit the sweet spot there - its sporty, elegant, classy and beautiful... I appreciate the Ceramic bezel on Subs and GMTs but for Daytonas, to me they have to be steel.
Yeah, Zenith movement - that floored me that a Rolex was using NON Rolex parts / movements. Which, alright, they massively re-engineered it so I can get onboard. I MUCH prefer the black subdials on the 16520 over the 116520 silver ones, perhaps without even compromise. BUT, indeed that bracelet and tritium make it a pass (next one) from me... The 116500ln is just the best of damn well everything. Double MSRP? Sigh, so it is...
I bought a 16523 Zenith Daytona 2 years ago. It has been an amazing watch and wears nice. It has risen in value but I have no reason to sell it. Its always a good day when it’s on the wrist!
Chronext Promo Code: BARKANDJACK
Chronext: www.chronext.co.uk/rolex?
What watch are you wearing on that gray Nato Strap at the beginning of the video?
Rolex didn't modify it. The design was specifically done by zenith on rolex requests
@fredo: Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical 38mm White Dial
does the Code only work for the UK or only for specific purchases? I tried it from Germany and it does not work: "The discount code BARKANDJACK could not be applied"
Tyrannimo89 the code should be global. It only works with the minimum spend of £5000, or equivalent. Let me know if you’re spending over £5,000 and it still doesn’t work and I’ll get them to check it.
116520 - I absolutely love the steel bezel. That would be my choice
The best Daytona is the one you can buy
That’s a good point.
So a citizen?
AD put me on a waiting list just yesterday. It’ll be my first Rolex.
Should be any day now🤞
@Sleve McDichael
The platitude versions are even harder to come by.
Preceramic Black dial, ceramic White dial that's my choise 😉
A 16520 Zenith Daytona cost a brick jouse to service! Just sold mine unserviced since Rolex AD claimed that service parts are becoming scarce on the Zenith 16520 movement and the service price is 60 % more expensive than on the 116520/116500 which is already not cheap.
Another reason for the steap service price on a Zenith movement is that it consists of a lot more (non Rolex) parts, in total more than 30 % additional components to service for Rolex i.e. takes longer time to disassemble/assemble/clean/exchange etc.
ADVISE/WARNING: Only buy a Zenith Daytona if you plan NOT to wear it!!!
how much was it
My 16520 was serviced last year for ~700€ in Rolex Rabat Madrid
@@modernworldiscrap Should´nt cost more for a simple disassembly, ultrasonic clean, change of gasket and assembly, but wait until the day it needs Zenith spare parts!
You are dead WRONG
All of these are stunning. When I decided to get one I looked at everything, went and held everyone of these in my hand. After weighing up all the differences I went with the 16520, it was between the two older models as I feel that in the long run they will hold their value best. I went with the 16520 ad not only did I like the small details better, the size of the subdials, that they are a little bit smaller and placed a tad lower on the dial, that they do not have the shiny silver surround. That the left subdial is the running seconds, something I feel is more in line with where I think this should be as Speedmasters and other have it there too.The thinner more elegant hands, the smaller time markers. Some say as tritium lose it's shine after a couple of decades the luminova version is better but I like that the tritium change colour and also change the way it works, makes it more vintage, more interesting. I will ALWAYS go for the tritium version of any watch given the choise. The last years fall of the prices specially for the ceramic model whilst the 16520 has lost much less value I think shows which model that will gain more in value as time goes by.
1:57 Although you're right, there's actually an easier-to-remember way to distinguish a Zenith from a non-Zenith model, one that can't be unseen: draw/imagine a line from the 9 to the 3 marker. The sub-registers' center is not aligned properly on the non-Zenith models to the diameter of the dial. Ugly AF imho...
What the actual fck? There’s no going back from here haha
Oh boy
My OCD radar has just maxed out at 11 ! That is on par with being told about Santa Claus ! 😢
@@stuartniven1220 Believe me, I know how you feel
There is no rule that says they must be crossing that horizontal line equidistantly. Making the subdials larger was one of the things they managed without increasing the case size, the tradeoff was making those subdials slightly higher.
My favourite is the Zenith-Daytona, I like the thinner hands (which you occasionally find in some 116520, but rarely), and the finer and longer "boat shape" hour markers, I feel it looks more refined. Also love the sub-dials location, they have a better placement, more symmetric and aligned with the 3 hands mov. The 16520 has so many variance, the 4 lines, floating dial, inverted 6, porcelain dial, and the various bezels marking... This is the oldest "modern day" Daytona as we know it today.
As someone who had some wrist time with all 3 versions, i a gree with you 100%.
I have 4 daytonas. Both of these newer steel daytonas & a bi metal zenith. I cant get my head around why people prefer these zeniths. The watch feels so much flimsier. Favourite for me is the ceramic without a doubt.
I think I would go for the 116520. Looks incredible, wears really well, the movement is great and it's very slim for a Chronograph. It's a near if not perfect chronograph imo. 👌🏻 Great Video Adrian!
I own the white dial 116520 and the bezel plays the light in different ways. Sometimes it is sparkly white, sometimes black and sometimes it looks like the polished metal it is. The C-tona just has a black bezel that is less dynamic in regards to how it plays the light.
The same argument can be made for the white dial vs the black dial. White is just bright and pops on the wrist whereas black is just dark in all light conditions.
I love the black ceramic, but I think I'd end up with the 116520. The all around steel is just understated in a way that the ceramic isn't
As has always been the case with any Sub, regarding the current Daytona if you’re planning on wearing it with suits on a regular basis it’s best to select the black dial variant.
I just got the 116520 a week ago....and I absolutely LOVE it!!
Had a 2007 for 12 years now and love it. Would buy a ceramic, if only my AD would sell me one, alas I’m not a good enough customer!!
I've dropped over $100k at my AD and he asked me for a "trade" "my original 50th anniversary Sub or my Hulk)to get in line for a new 41mm something or other. LOL, I don't want to trade anything so I guess I'll be waiting to stumble across one in some AD in East Bum F.
@@chipmacgill your AD doesnt seem to appreciate his customers...
I love that ceramic one... probably the only Rolex that does anything for me... that white face with the black rimmed subdials is just incredible... stunning imagery as usual Adrian!
Yeah I needed up falling for the ceramic one. It’s just so cool.
Golden year for the Daytona is 1998: 16520 with tritium dial and SEL bracelet. 1 year production. Grail.
The later versions of the 16520 did have super luminova and solid endlink bracelets. I think they were both introduced in 1999.
You are absolutely right!!!! the ceramic is sporty while the none ceramic is possibly a bit more dressy. I agree I would own both 116520 & 116500.
Had both a (white) 116520 and a (black) 16520 for a number of years. While superior technically (movement, bracelet), I just sold the 116520 to keep only the 16520. It is more refined, and that Zenith movement just make it a bit more special in my view, despite its limitations (non-hacking, smaller power reserve).
I'd go for the 116520, the ceramic is too blingy for me.
Why are the watchmakers in the chronext pictures not wearing fingercots?
116520 - white dial. Prettiest watch ever made, period.
I have a 116520 black and regretted not getting the white too when the price wasn't as crazy... I remember seeing one for sale on a AD store but I just didn't have the money to afford another one back then...
116520 all steel is the best one for me... saying that, what you really want is all 3 !!
I actually own the 116520 white dial and steel bezel and it’s an absolute masterpiece, works very nicely alongside my ceramic Submariner
116520 - pure classy class
Ceramic Daytona is the only watch anyone will ever need. Dressy, Casual, Sporty. You can wear it anywhere, anytime. Theres a reason why they are 2x list price. Demand demand demand. The people have spoken. As far as I am concerned all models will continue to increase with no end in sight. Great content as always
I had the Zenith version for a while and eventually let it go as I just didn’t connect with it on an emotional level... that said, it’s amazing on the wrist and I loved the feedback of the pushers and crown. A great watch to wear - even if for some models it’s challenging to tell the time :)
116520 have the best value for the money! 👌👌
I like the first two steel bezel more, and i would choose the 116520 for : Super luminova (tritium is dead after 20 years or less) , 72h power reserve and (as i red on watch forums) simpler movement to service (so fewer work hours and so less expensive). Now i need 17.000€ or more to buy one on the grey market ! :)
The latest production 2014-2016 of the 116520 has chromalight too..
The 16520 is amazing with its story regarding the zenith movement and I really like the more symmetric look of the subdials.
I opted for the pre ceramic version simply due to the more classic, elegant looks.
A super userful video! Always wanted a comparison video on all three Daytona models! Thank you Adrian:)
The 4130 movement is just so smooth it's unreal. You can run the 4130 all day long and it will only affect the 70 hour power reserve by a measly 2 hours!
Great video Adrian. Ideally , it would be nice to have them side by side and try them on. Rolex watches always look so much better in person and I suspect it would be much easier to decide between the 116520 and the 116500 simply by comparing black vs shiny silver bezel. Picture and video I prefer the 116520 but I suspect in real life it would be the 116500.
Its interesting you stated that daytona c has 0.5mm shorter lug than 116520. I thought the cases are 100% the same. Anyway I gave up 116520 black dial and move toward the ceramic white just because the dial is really hard to read. Way too shinny..
Definitely go Black Dial Steel Bezel! It's just so shiny and nice in real life. I have a 116500 and I'd swap it for a steel bezel in a second!
Great video Adrian, the movement shots was so amazing. We love your videos related to amazing knowledge on differences on models numbers of Daytona.
I love the Zenith purely because the centre of the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock subdials line up perfectly with the 3 and 9 on the dial where as the later versions don't , they are raised and it doesn't even get close for me.
Love that all steel version.
I bought a Daytona 116520 a few years ago and love it, the weight is right and it wears well with a suit and jeans. I find the black dial is easier to read in the sun.
Great video. I prefer the horizontal alignment on the bezel of the 116520. And the more subdued silver sub-dial rings. I kinda wish the chronograph sub-dials aligned with the centre pinions. But it still looks great. Despite the Rolex specs, the case is more like 38.2mm. And there were different marks within each reference with the 116520 receiving Chromalight indices and hands. Keep up the great work!
Great topic Adrian! Any idea of indicative prices one can expect to pay for each?
High quality video, love it! The Daytona is such a beautiful and legendary watch!!
I'm confused y why the reduction of bpm is a credit in a chrono meant to run race time at 10th of a second intervals. Would like some info. :)
Ever since I saw video pointing out the fact that the Daytona has asymmetrical lugs, I can't un-see it. Still love this watch ... simply the best proportioned and easy to wear chronograph out there.
My next Rolex will be a Daytona. However, it’s been impossible to get and grey market is crazy 😢
3 of the heavyweights of the Rolex division for sure.....very iconic watches. I've had a Zenith bi metal, 116520 and would love the latest ceramic bezel one love the black touches on the sub dials has to be a white dial for me. Great watch comparisons Adrian!
Adrian, I'm biased - but I would also have to pick the 116520. I was fortunate enough to get a new one over ten years ago. I love its classic look and yes, the movement is fabulous. But for me it was simply the classic elegance of this watch that I like. It is by far the most comfortable watch to wear. I can safely predict that I will never part with it.
Info's incorrect. The mk 7 & 8 had already SEL and Superluminova
How about the Daytona APH Error Dial? Is it more valuable?
If it’s a Zenith with a Patrizzi dial, then I’ll take one of those. Otherwise, I like a ceramic Daytona (any dial color).
20k on a Daytona... one thing stops me, A. Lange and Sohne 😶
Absolutely spot on sir! I’m always drawn to ALS👍
not really the same watches though. I am kind of done with Rolex as well and looking at Breguet and Lange, but aren't they really "dress" watches?
Lange’s chronograph costs double of Daytona
Totally agree!! I actually have the latest panda Daytona but selling it to fund a proper watch!! 😈
The Datograph isnt a steel sports chrono. When you buy a Daytona, youre buying heritage thats imo more interesting and cooler than a Lange Datograph.
I love the looks of the Zenith Daytona. Also, later Zenith Daytonas have solid endlinks and luminova dials.
In my opinion the 16520 white dial is the most beautiful modern daytona, followed by the 116520 black dial.
The ceramic gives its best with gold cases, f.e. the 116515ln is simply gorgeous!
I agree with you Adrian, the new versions look so much better!!
Thanks for watching buddy. 👍🏻
116520 all the way. Great vid as always mate!
Out of these 3 Daytonas, the award for the best looks goes to... your haircut! Then, the 116500 takes the crown for me. Cheers!
🤣
Ceramic for me, awesome video again thank you for sharing Adrian
Hi. I had brought 116500 two weeks ago.. It's a beautiful timepieces.
I personally own the black dial 116500. LOVE IT!!!
The brushed lugs on the zenith are the standout for me.
You cannot tell the time on the daytona...rather have an OP?
Definitely the ceramic dial...sportier and more unique
Zenith is unique, ceramic is a manufactured collectible. In terms of wearability I’m definitely with you but for uniqueness and value definitely the zenith
The daytona is definitely a grail watch for me. Also I'm a big fan of panda dials. So the 116500 checks off so many boxes for me.
Hi Adrian, if I had the choice and money, I‘d go for the ceramic one. I love the black and white contrast between the bezel and dial plus it is less prone to scratches. Great presentation of differences between models
That's the one I'd pick too.
3:12 This is something that almost none of Rolex's competitors understand. Yes, Rolex has the brand to bolster their image and sales, but a BIG reason why it's not easy to "just buy something else" is the fact that Rolex watches just FIT. 40mm or thereabouts, often times smaller than advertised, 11-13mm thick for most of their sports watches, and are designed with restraint. Nothing fancy, but nothing dull.
116520 black dial and a 16520 white dial on a leather strap would make a great pair.
Definitely 116500, everything is superb. Especially Loving the ceramic tachymeter that gives a nice contrast to the white dial. Just more elegant imo.
Love this video. Not only does it feature my grail watch but it’s such an informative video and expertly put together by Adrian 👍
Great Video! New Ceramic Bezel 116500 is the best.
Thanks for the nice comparison. For me the one in the middle. But too expensive currently.
I bought the Parnis version. It's a great design for sure.
very hard choice! I think I would go with the double 116520 but the latest edition is super cool.
I understand people can love and hate Rolex but these Daytonas are just so beautiful!! No disrespect to the rest of the watches out there (affordable watch collector here) but when you say chronograph... These guys jump right up to my mind!
Thanks for the video. 9:40 minutes of day dreaming !
If I had to choose, would actually take none of the three but rather stick with my Zenith El Primero Rainbow.
It has an easy to wear size and case dimension, solid bracelet and most of all the date function, which to me is imperative and missing on all of the Rolex Daytonas. Sure, it does not have the same reputation or monetary value like the Rolex, but it is a no nonsense watch you can wear on all occasions.
Interesting vid. It would have been worthwhile to include the two tone as well. Those are actually still available without paying absolutely insane over retail.
I have a Big Red 6263 I had a 2006 Daytona that was stolen I am looking to replace it. This video has been helpful. Thank you
I went with the Zenith because, tritium, black sub dials with steel bezel. I like the contrast. :-)
Ceramic,the best.I liked it so much that I've bought the black dial first and later the white dail 😅👍🏻good video
That's a really interesting dive into one of the coolest watches out there.
Years ago when they showed the new 116500 my heart sank. I thought the ceramic ruined it, I loved the steel bezel on the 116520. Ceramic looks cheap to me. The 116500 looks too much like a submariner and not enough like a Daytona.
Thanks Adrian, informative as ever, every day is a school day for me as I’m still learning about the differences 🚒👍
Its the Ceramic for me Adrian. i feel its an investment too that you can wear scratch enjoy and still not loose money. A winner all round.
Great video as usual. I noticed that the lug-to-lug dimensions for the 11650 is 46.5 mm compared to the two other models that are 47 mm. You didn’t highlight this detail so I am uncertain if it was just a typo? All the best!
A little bit off topic here, but I received a bark and jack Nato strap today black 22mm, folks I strongly recommend these top quality and very comfy 👍😊 will buy again
I would have to choose the white dial, with ceramic bezel. Absolutely stunning.
The three are pure gems. However, to me a Rolex must have a Rolex movement. And between the 116520 and the 116500 I will pick the 116520. Rolex hit the sweet spot there - its sporty, elegant, classy and beautiful... I appreciate the Ceramic bezel on Subs and GMTs but for Daytonas, to me they have to be steel.
1.5% discount that’s generous of them
Yet another great video. I would like to see a video of the Lange 1 🙏
Thanks Richard. I’d love to get hands on with a Lange 1. 👍🏻
116520 white dial all day long. Best looking of all time.
I’m a 116500 owner, might not be the zenith value but it’s the Best Daytona in Quality they’ve ever made
No mention of the black dial. I know everyone seem to prefer the white, but do you have any views on the black one, which I think I prefer?
Nice video. Next up...can you help me understand exactly what a Paul Newman Daytona is?
Did you ever find your Turn O Graph? I saw one with the Blue Dial on Chrono24.
BTW, I do like the newer Turn O Graph, Black Dial, Red seconds hand, Red Turn O Graph
The exact video I was looking for. Great info and awesome authentic reaction to which watch you'd prefer!
Yeah, Zenith movement - that floored me that a Rolex was using NON Rolex parts / movements. Which, alright, they massively re-engineered it so I can get onboard. I MUCH prefer the black subdials on the 16520 over the 116520 silver ones, perhaps without even compromise. BUT, indeed that bracelet and tritium make it a pass (next one) from me... The 116500ln is just the best of damn well everything. Double MSRP? Sigh, so it is...
The slimmer hour marker on the Zenith gets me, but the newest panda is the one I would buy.
I bought a 16523 Zenith Daytona 2 years ago. It has been an amazing watch and wears nice. It has risen in value but I have no reason to sell it. Its always a good day when it’s on the wrist!
Best Daytona comparison on TH-cam
Not to forget, also a change self-winding movement . To start with 16520
what's your opinion on the asymmetric lugs Adrian... how come no one talks about it?
Great video Adrian. 3 Stunners for sure, IMHO the ceramic looks absolutely beautiful. BTW a Daytona looks great on you brother!
Miguel
Thanks buddy. They are a little out of my price range haha.
Bark and Jack 😂 that makes 2 of us brother!
I know it's asymmetrical but I love to have the running seconds to one side. The zenith daytona for me everyday :)